1
|
Hofmann T, Kohlhase N, Eftimova D, Eder MM, Staehler M, Ruge MI, Muacevic A, Fürweger C. Accuracy of robotic radiosurgery in renal cell carcinoma. Phys Med 2024; 122:103372. [PMID: 38759469 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although emerging clinical evidence supports robotic radiosurgery as a highly effective treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) less than 4 cm in diameter, delivery uncertainties and associated target volume margins have not been studied in detail. We assess intrafraction tumor motion patterns and accuracy of robotic radiosurgery in renal tumors with real-time respiratory tracking to optimize treatment margins. METHODS Delivery log files from 165 consecutive treatments of RCC were retrospectively analyzed. Five components were considered for planning target volume (PTV) margin estimation: (a) The model error from the correlation model between patient breath and tumor motion, (b) the prediction error from an algorithm predicting the patient breathing pattern, (c) the targeting error from the treatment robot, (d) the inherent total accuracy of the system for respiratory motion tracking, and (e) the margin required to cover potential target rotation, simulated with PTV rotations up to 10°. RESULTS The median tumor motion was 10.5 mm, 2.4 mm and 4.4 mm in the superior-inferior, left-right, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. The root of the sum of squares of all contributions to the system's inaccuracy results in a minimum PTV margin of 4.3 mm, 2.6 mm and 3.0 mm in the superior-inferior, left-right and anterior-posterior directions, respectively, assuming optimal fiducial position and neglecting target deformation. CONCLUSIONS We have assessed kidney motion and derived PTV margins for the treatment of RCC with robotic radiosurgery, which helps to deliver renal treatments in a more consistent manner and potentially further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Hofmann
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Nadja Kohlhase
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Dochka Eftimova
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Martin Eder
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- University Hospital of Munich, Department of Urology, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian I Ruge
- University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Albertus Magnus Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | - Alexander Muacevic
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 Munich, Germany; University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Albertus Magnus Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Corrao G, Andratschke N, Balagamwala EH, Bedke J, Blanck O, Capitanio U, Correa RJM, De Meerleer G, Franzese C, Gaeta A, Gandini S, Garibaldi C, Gerszten PC, Gillessen S, Grubb WR, Guckenberger M, Hannan R, Jhaveri PM, Josipovic M, Kerkmeijer LGW, Lehrer EJ, Lindskog M, Louie AV, Nguyen QN, Ost P, Palma DA, Procopio G, Rossi M, Staehler M, Tree AC, Tsang YM, Van As N, Zaorsky NG, Zilli T, Pasquier D, Siva S. Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e193-e204. [PMID: 38697165 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00023-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Abstract
The purpose of this European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) project, endorsed by the European Association of Urology, is to explore expert opinion on the management of patients with oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma by means of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on extracranial metastases, with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for patient selection, treatment doses, and concurrent systemic therapy. A questionnaire on SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma was prepared by a core group and reviewed by a panel of ten prominent experts in the field. The Delphi consensus methodology was applied, sending three rounds of questionnaires to clinicians identified as key opinion leaders in the field. At the end of the third round, participants were able to find consensus on eight of the 37 questions. Specifically, panellists agreed to apply no restrictions regarding age (25 [100%) of 25) and primary renal cell carcinoma histology (23 [92%] of 25) for SABR candidates, on the upper threshold of three lesions to offer ablative treatment in patients with oligoprogression, and on the concomitant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitor. SABR was indicated as the treatment modality of choice for renal cell carcinoma bone oligometatasis (20 [80%] of 25) and for adrenal oligometastases 22 (88%). No consensus or major agreement was reached regarding the appropriate schedule, but the majority of the poll (54%-58%) retained the every-other-day schedule as the optimal choice for all the investigated sites. The current ESTRO Delphi consensus might provide useful direction for the application of SABR in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma and highlight the key areas of ongoing debate, perhaps directing future research efforts to close knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ehsan H Balagamwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jens Bedke
- Department of Urology and Transplantation surgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Aurora Gaeta
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Garibaldi
- Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - William R Grubb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Pavan M Jhaveri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linda G W Kerkmeijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Eric J Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Magnus Lindskog
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Section of Genitourinary Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium and Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David A Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Dipartimento Di Oncologia Medica, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maddalena Rossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Staehler
- Interdisciplinary Centre on Renal Tumours, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - Yat Man Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicholas Van As
- Department of Urology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre O Lambret, Lille, France; University of Lille, Centrale Lille, CNRS, UMR 9189-CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Staehler M, Rodler S, Brinkmann I, Stief CG, Graser A, Götz M, Herlemann A. Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Renal Mass Biopsy: Seeding is not Anecdotal. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:189-192. [PMID: 37985332 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Renal biopsy is recommended if the outcome might alter therapeutic decisions for patients who present with renal masses of unclear etiology. However, little is known about long-term risks related to this procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of an institutional database maintained by a tertiary referral center that included patients who underwent renal biopsies between 2003 and 2005 with a follow-up of at least 15 years. Renal biopsies were taken percutaneously with a coaxial technique according to guideline recommendations and included off-line ultrasound guidance. RESULTS We identified 106 patients who underwent biopsies for a renal mass of unclear etiology. The median age was 58.7 years (43.7-66.2). A median of 4.2 (3-6) biopsies were collected from each patient. Tumor seeding leading to local growth was identified in 6 patients (5,7%) after a median follow-up of 8.2 years. Four of these lesions that were resected exhibited the same histology as the original biopsy result; these patients experienced no further recurrence. In 45 patients (42%), the biopsy results led to a therapy other than surgery (n = 28 lymphoma, n = 6 metastasis from other malignancies, n = 11 oncocytoma). The remaining 61 patients (58%) were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma treated either surgically or with ablation. None of the patients developed metastatic spread related to tumor seeding. CONCLUSION Tumor seeding after renal mass biopsy is a rare, but relevant risk associated with this procedure. As indications for renal mass biopsy increase, longer-term follow-up and improved biopsy techniques should be considered to address this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Brinkmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Annabel Graser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Götz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pyrgidis N, Schulz GB, Stief C, Blajan I, Ivanova T, Graser A, Staehler M. Surgical Trends and Complications in Partial and Radical Nephrectomy: Results from the GRAND Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:97. [PMID: 38201523 PMCID: PMC10778168 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the current trends in renal cancer surgery, as well as to compare the perioperative outcomes of partial versus radical nephrectomy. METHODS We used the GeRmAn Nationwide inpatient Data (GRAND), provided by the Research Data Center of the Federal Bureau of Statistics (2005-2021). We report the largest study in the field, with 317,843 patients and multiple patient-level analyses. RESULTS Overall, 123,924 (39%) patients underwent partial and 193,919 (61%) underwent radical nephrectomy in Germany from 2005 to 2021. Of them, 57,308 (18%) were operated on in low-, 142,702 (45%) in intermediate-, and 117,833 (37%) in high-volume centers. A total of 249,333 (78%) patients underwent open, 44,994 (14%) laparoscopic, and 23,516 (8%) robotic nephrectomy. The number of patients undergoing renal surgery remained relatively stable from 2005 to 2021. Over the study period, the utilization of partial nephrectomy increased threefold, while radical nephrectomy decreased by about 40%. After adjusting for major risk factors in the multivariate regression analysis, radical nephrectomy was associated with 3.2-fold higher odds (95% CI: 3.2 to 3.9, p < 0.001) of 30-day mortality, longer hospitalization by 1.9 days (95% CI: 1.9 to 2, p < 0.001), and higher inpatient costs by EUR 1778 (95% CI: 1694 to 1862, p < 0.001) compared to partial nephrectomy. Furthermore, radical nephrectomy had a higher risk of in-hospital transfusion (p < 0.001), sepsis (p < 0.001), acute respiratory failure (p < 0.001), acute kidney disease (p < 0.001), acute thromboembolism (p < 0.001), surgical wound infection (p < 0.001), ileus (p < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (p < 0.001), and pancreatitis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS More patients are offered partial nephrectomy in Germany. Patients undergoing radical nephrectomy present with a higher rate of concomitant risk factors and have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and increased in-hospital costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (N.P.); (G.B.S.); (C.S.); (I.B.); (T.I.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siva S, Staehler M. The Right Tool for the Job: The Knife, the SABR, or Fire and Ice? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1047. [PMID: 37980134 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bui VN, Unterrainer LM, Brendel M, Kunte SC, Holzgreve A, Allmendinger F, Bartenstein P, Klauschen F, Unterrainer M, Staehler M, Ledderose S. PSMA-Expression Is Highly Associated with Histological Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Potential Implications for Theranostic Approaches. Biomedicines 2023; 11:3095. [PMID: 38002095 PMCID: PMC10668989 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11113095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In renal cell carcinoma (RCC), accurate imaging methods are required for treatment planning and response assessment to therapy. In addition, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic options, especially in metastatic RCC. One way to combine diagnostics and therapy in a so-called theranostic approach is the use of radioligands directed against surface antigens. For instance, radioligands against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have already been successfully used for diagnosis and radionuclide therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that PSMA is expressed not only in prostate cancer but also in the neovasculature of several solid tumors, which has raised hopes to use PSMA-guided theranostic approaches in other tumor entities, too. However, data on PSMA expression in different histopathological subtypes of RCC are sparse. Because a better understanding of PSMA expression in RCC is critical to assess which patients would benefit most from theranostic approaches using PSMA-targeted ligands, we investigated the expression pattern of PSMA in different subtypes of RCC on protein level. Immunohistochemical staining for PSMA was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival material of major different histological subtypes of RCC (clear cell RCC (ccRCC)), papillary RCC (pRCC) and chromophobe RCC (cpRCC). The extent and intensity of PSMA staining were scored semi-quantitatively and correlated with the histological RCC subtypes. Group comparisons were calculated with the Kruskal-Wallis test. In all cases, immunoreactivity was detected only in the tumor-associated vessels and not in tumor cells. Staining intensity was the strongest in ccRCC, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. ccRCC showed the most diffuse staining pattern, followed by cpRCC and pRCC. Our results provide a rationale for PSMA-targeted theranostic approaches in ccRCC and cpRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinh Ngoc Bui
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Lena M. Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C. Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Fabian Allmendinger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.B.); (S.C.K.); (F.A.); (P.B.); (M.U.)
- Die RADIOLOGIE, 80331 Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Stephan Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (F.K.); (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan VS, Correa RJM, Warner A, Ali M, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Kwon YS, Morgan SC, Cury F, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan ID, Chu W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Grubb W, Louie AV, Siva S. 5-Year Renal Function Outcomes after SABR for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Report from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium of the Kidney (IROCK). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S84. [PMID: 37784588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents uncommonly in patients with a congenital solitary kidney or prior contralateral nephrectomy. The objective of this study was to compare renal function outcomes of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with primary RCC with ≥2 years of follow-up at 12 participating International Radiosurgery Consortium for Kidney (IROCK) institutions were included. Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma or metastatic disease were excluded. Renal function was measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). For patients where eGFR was not recorded, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation was used to estimate eGFR based on known creatinine. Baseline characteristics and renal function outcomes were compared between solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of eGFR decline ≥ 15 mL/min and any eGFR increase evaluated at 1-year post-SABR. RESULTS One hundred and ninety patients with solitary (n = 56) or bilateral kidneys (n = 134) underwent SABR and were followed for a median of 5.0 years (IQR: 3.4-6.8). Pre-SABR eGFR (mean ± SD) was similar in patients with solitary (61.1 ± 23.2 mL/min) vs. bilateral kidneys (58.0 ± 22.3 mL/min, p = 0.324). Mean tumor size was 3.70 ± 1.40 cm in solitary and 4.35 ± 2.50 cm in bilateral kidneys (p = 0.026). After SABR, an initial compensatory increase in eGFR was observed in both cohorts (22.7% solitary and 17.7% bilateral at 1 year). This compensatory increase persisted in patients with bilateral but not a solitary kidney (10.3% vs. 0% at 3-years and 21.1% vs. 0% at 5-years, respectively). At 5-years post-SABR, eGFR decreased by -14.5 ± 7.6 in solitary and -13.3 ± 15.9 mL/min in bilateral kidneys (p = 0.665). At all timepoints assessed, there were no significant differences in eGFR decline between solitary vs. bilateral cohorts (all p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences in post-SABR end-stage renal disease (7.1% vs. 6.7%) or dialysis (3.6% vs. 3.7%) in solitary vs. bilateral, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing tumor size (OR per 1 cm: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.14-2.16, p = 0.006) and baseline eGFR (OR per 10 mL/min: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, p = 0.034) was more likely to be associated with eGFR decline ≥ 15 mL/min. There was no significant association between solitary vs. bilateral kidney and eGFR decline (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.45-3.34, p = 0.693). CONCLUSION There was no observed difference between renal function outcomes in patients with a solitary vs. bilateral kidneys. While larger tumor size may increase the risk of eGFR decline post-SABR, treatment of a solitary kidney does not appear to increase the risk of renal dysfunction long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V S Tan
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - R J M Correa
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - A Warner
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - M Ali
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Muacevic
- University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - L Ponsky
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - S S Lo
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - H Onishi
- University of Yamanashi, Chuo, Japan
| | - A Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Y S Kwon
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - S C Morgan
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - F Cury
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - B S Teh
- Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - A Mahadevan
- NYU Langone Health Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - I D Kaplan
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - W Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Hannan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - M Staehler
- University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - W Grubb
- Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - A V Louie
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Motzer RJ, Russo P, Grünwald V, Tomita Y, Zurawski B, Parikh O, Buti S, Barthélémy P, Goh JC, Ye D, Lingua A, Lattouf JB, Albigès L, George S, Shuch B, Sosman J, Staehler M, Vázquez Estévez S, Simsek B, Spiridigliozzi J, Chudnovsky A, Bex A. Summary of Research: Adjuvant Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Placebo for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy (CheckMate 914): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial. Target Oncol 2023; 18:639-641. [PMID: 37659025 PMCID: PMC10517884 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00987-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
This is a summary of a research article reporting Part A of the CheckMate 914 study (NCT03138512; EudraCT 2016-004502-34). Following surgery to remove renal cell carcinoma (RCC), people with a high risk of the cancer returning received nivolumab plus ipilimumab (adjuvant therapy) or placebo to see if this risk was reduced. The results of this study showed that the risk of RCC returning or death was not changed with adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment compared with placebo. In addition, people treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab had more side effects compared with people treated with placebo (89% versus 57%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Motzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Clinic for Urology, Clinic for Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Urology and Department of Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Bogdan Zurawski
- Department of Outpatient Chemotherapy, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Omi Parikh
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- ICON Research, South Brisbane, and Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Alejo Lingua
- Instituto Médico Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Argentina
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lattouf
- Department of Surgery-Urology, CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence Albigès
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Saby George
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Brian Shuch
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Interdisciplinary Centre on Renal Tumors, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sergio Vázquez Estévez
- Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti (HULA), EOXI de Lugo, Cervo e Monforte, Lugo, Spain
| | - Burcin Simsek
- Department of Global Biometrics and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Julia Spiridigliozzi
- Department of Oncology Late Clinical Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Aleksander Chudnovsky
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mikuteit M, Zschäbitz S, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Duensing S, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos F, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Erlmeier M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Erlmeier F, Steffens S. Evaluation of Gas 6 as a Prognostic Marker in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol Int 2023; 107:713-722. [PMID: 37348477 PMCID: PMC10413799 DOI: 10.1159/000529898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (Gas 6) is a ligand that plays a role in proliferation and migration of cells. For several tumor entities, high levels of Gas 6 are associated with poorer survival. We examined the prognostic role of Gas 6 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), especially in papillary RCC (pRCC), which is still unclear. METHODS The patients' sample collection is a joint collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n = 240 and n = 128 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of Gas 6 was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS In total, Gas 6 staining was evaluable in 180 of 240 type 1 and 110 of 128 type 2 pRCC cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed no significant difference in 5-year overall survival for all pRCC nor either subtype. Also, Gas+ and Gas- groups did not significantly differ in any tumor or patient characteristics. CONCLUSION Gas 6 was not found to be an independent prognostic marker in pRCC. Future studies are warranted to determine if Gas 6 plays a role as prognostic marker or therapeutic target in pRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Clinic for Obstretics and Woman's Health and Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - German Network of Kidney Cancer
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office, Curriculum Development, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
- Clinic for Obstretics and Woman's Health and Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Motzer RJ, Russo P, Grünwald V, Tomita Y, Zurawski B, Parikh O, Buti S, Barthélémy P, Goh JC, Ye D, Lingua A, Lattouf JB, Albigès L, George S, Shuch B, Sosman J, Staehler M, Vázquez Estévez S, Simsek B, Spiridigliozzi J, Chudnovsky A, Bex A. Adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo for localised renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy (CheckMate 914): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 401:821-832. [PMID: 36774933 PMCID: PMC10259621 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02574-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective adjuvant therapy for patients with resected localised renal cell carcinoma represents an unmet need, with surveillance being the standard of care. We report results from part A of a phase 3, randomised trial that aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. METHODS The double-blind, randomised, phase 3 CheckMate 914 trial enrolled patients with localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma who were at high risk of relapse after radical or partial nephrectomy between 4-12 weeks before random assignment. Part A, reported herein, was done in 145 hospitals and cancer centres across 20 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg) intravenously every 2 weeks for 12 doses plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) intravenously every 6 weeks for four doses, or matching placebo, via an interactive response technology system. The expected treatment period was 24 weeks, and treatment could be continued until week 36, allowing for treatment delays. Randomisation was stratified by TNM stage and nephrectomy (partial vs radical). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival according to masked independent central review; safety was a secondary endpoint. Disease-free survival was analysed in all randomly assigned patients (intention-to-treat population); exposure, safety, and tolerability were analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug (all-treated population). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03138512. FINDINGS Between Aug 28, 2017, and March 16, 2021, 816 patients were randomly assigned to receive either adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (405 patients) or placebo (411 patients). 580 (71%) of 816 patients were male and 236 (29%) patients were female. With a median follow-up of 37·0 months (IQR 31·3-43·7), median disease-free survival was not reached in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and was 50·7 months (95% CI 48·1 to not estimable) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·71-1·19; p=0·53). The number of events required for the planned overall survival interim analysis was not reached at the time of the data cutoff, and only 61 events occurred (33 in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group and 28 in the placebo group). 155 (38%) of 404 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 42 (10%) of 407 patients who received placebo had grade 3-5 adverse events. All-cause adverse events of any grade led to discontinuation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 129 (32%) of 404 treated patients and of placebo in nine (2%) of 407 treated patients. Four deaths were attributed to treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and no deaths were attributed to treatment with placebo. INTERPRETATION Adjuvant therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab did not improve disease-free survival versus placebo in patients with localised renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. Our study results do not support this regimen for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Motzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Paul Russo
- Department of Surgery, Urology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Clinic for Urology, Clinic for Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Urology and Department of Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Bogdan Zurawski
- Department of Outpatient Chemotherapy, Prof Franciszek Łukaszczyk Oncology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Omi Parikh
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Philippe Barthélémy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- ICON Research, South Brisbane, and Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Alejo Lingua
- Instituto Médico Río Cuarto, Rio Cuarto, Argentina
| | - Jean-Baptiste Lattouf
- Department of Surgery-Urology, CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Laurence Albigès
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Saby George
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Brian Shuch
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Interdisciplinary Centre on Renal Tumors, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Burcin Simsek
- Department of Global Biometrics and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Julia Spiridigliozzi
- Department of Oncology Late Clinical Global Drug Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Aleksander Chudnovsky
- Department of Oncology, Clinical Development, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Urology, The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choueiri TK, Eto M, Motzer R, De Giorgi U, Buchler T, Basappa NS, Méndez-Vidal MJ, Tjulandin S, Hoon Park S, Melichar B, Hutson T, Alemany C, McGregor B, Powles T, Grünwald V, Alekseev B, Rha SY, Kopyltsov E, Kapoor A, Alonso Gordoa T, Goh JC, Staehler M, Merchan JR, Xie R, Perini RF, Mody K, McKenzie J, Porta CG. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus sunitinib as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (CLEAR): extended follow-up from the phase 3, randomised, open-label study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:228-238. [PMID: 36858721 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00049-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the primary analysis of the CLEAR study, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (data cutoff Aug 28, 2020). We aimed to assess overall survival based on 7 months of additional follow-up. METHODS This is a protocol-prespecified updated overall survival analysis (data cutoff March 31, 2021) of the open-label, phase 3, randomised CLEAR trial. Patients with clear-cell advanced renal cell carcinoma who had not received any systemic anticancer therapy for renal cell carcinoma, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, or any systemic investigational anticancer drug, were eligible for inclusion from 200 sites (hospitals and cancer centres) across 20 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive lenvatinib (20 mg per day orally in 21-day cycles) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenously every 21 days; lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group), lenvatinib (18 mg per day orally) plus everolimus (5 mg per day orally; lenvatinib plus everolimus group [not reported in this updated analysis]) in 21-day cycles, or sunitinib (50 mg per day orally, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off; sunitinib group). Eligible patients were at least 18 years old with a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or higher. A computer-generated randomisation scheme was used, and stratification factors were geographical region and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center prognostic groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent imaging review according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). In this Article, extended follow-up analyses for progression-free survival and protocol-specified updated overall survival data are reported for the intention-to-treat population. No safety analyses were done at this follow-up. This study is closed to new participants and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02811861. FINDINGS Between Oct 13, 2016, and July 24, 2019, 1417 patients were screened for inclusion in the CLEAR trial, of whom 1069 (75%; 273 [26%] female, 796 [74%] male; median age 62 years [IQR 55-69]) were randomly assigned: 355 (33%) patients (255 [72%] male and 100 [28%] female) to the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group, 357 (33%) patients (275 [77%] male and 82 [23%] female) to the sunitinib group, and 357 (33%) patients to the lenvatinib plus everolimus group (not reported in this updated analysis). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·8 months (IQR 20·3-33·8) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 19·4 months (5·5-32·5) in the sunitinib group. Median progression-free survival was 23·3 months (95% CI 20·8-27·7) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 9·2 months (6·0-11·0) in the sunitinib group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·42 [95% CI 0·34-0·52]). Median overall survival follow-up was 33·7 months (IQR 27·4-36·9) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 33·4 months (26·7-36·8) in the sunitinib group. Overall survival was improved with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (median not reached [95% CI 41·5-not estimable]) versus sunitinib (median not reached [38·4-not estimable]; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·93]). INTERPRETATION Efficacy benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab over sunitinib were durable and clinically meaningful with extended follow-up. These results support the use of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. FUNDING Eisai and Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Robert Motzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - Tomas Buchler
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Naveen S Basappa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - María José Méndez-Vidal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Sergei Tjulandin
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N N Blokhin National Medical Research Center for Oncology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bohuslav Melichar
- Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Thomas Hutson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Carlos Alemany
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Bradley McGregor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England, UK; Department of Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary Institute of London, London, UK
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Clinic for Urology and Clinic for Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris Alekseev
- Department of Onco-urology, P A Hertsen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Evgeny Kopyltsov
- State Institution of Healthcare "Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary", Omsk, Russia
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Teresa Alonso Gordoa
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeffrey C Goh
- ICON Research, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Department of BioMedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jaime R Merchan
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ran Xie
- Biostatistics, Eisai, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | | | - Kalgi Mody
- Clinical Research, Eisai, Nutley, NJ, USA
| | | | - Camillo G Porta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari 'A Moro', Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krug D, Imhoff D, Haidenberger A, Heßler N, Schäfer J, Huttenlocher S, Chatzikonstantinou G, Fürweger C, Ramm U, König IR, Chun F, Staehler M, Rödel C, Muacevic A, Vonthein R, Dunst J, Blanck O. Robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: final analysis of the German HYPOSTAT trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:565-573. [PMID: 36757424 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02044-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report results of the first German prospective multicenter single-arm phase II trial (ARO 2013-06; NCT02635256) of hypofractionated robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer (HYPOSTAT). METHODS Patients eligible for the HYPOSTAT study had localized prostate cancer (cT1‑3 cN0 cM0), Gleason score ≤ 7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 15 ng/ml, prostate volume ≤ 80 cm3, and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤ 12. Initially, inclusion was limited to patients ≥ 75 years or patients 70-74 years with additional risk factors. The trial protocol was later amended to allow for enrolment of patients aged ≥ 60 years. The treatment consisted of 35 Gy delivered in 5 fractions to the prostate and for intermediate- or high-risk patients, also to the proximal seminal vesicles using the CyberKnife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary endpoint was the rate of treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity based on the RTOG scale 12-15 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints were acute toxicity, late toxicity, urinary function, quality of life, and PSA response. RESULTS From July 2016 through December 2018, 85 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment, of whom 83 could be evaluated regarding the primary endpoint. Patients mostly had intermediate-risk disease with a median PSA value of 7.97 ng/ml and Gleason score of 7a and 7b in 43.5% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. At the final follow-up 12-15 months after treatment, no patient suffered from treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥ 2 toxicity. Acute toxicity was mostly mild, with three grade 3 events, and the cumulative rate of grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicity was 8.4% (95% CI 4.1-16.4%). There were no major changes in urinary function or quality of life. The median PSA value dropped to 1.18 ng/ml 12-15 months after treatment. There was one patient who developed distant metastases. CONCLUSION Robotic SBRT with 35 Gy in 5 fractions was associated with a favorable short-term toxicity profile. Recruitment for the HYPOSTAT‑2 trial (ARO-2018‑4; NCT03795337), which further analyses the late toxicity of this regimen with a planned sample size of 500 patients, is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany. .,Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany.,Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Nicole Heßler
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jane Schäfer
- Zentrum für Klinische Studien, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Stefan Huttenlocher
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany.,Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany
| | - Georgios Chatzikonstantinou
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany.,Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Ulla Ramm
- Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany.,Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Inke R König
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Lübeck, Germany
| | - Felix Chun
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Reinhard Vonthein
- Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Oliver Blanck
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany.,Saphir Radiochirurgie Zentrum Frankfurt am Main und Norddeutschland, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rodler S, Goetz M, Graser A, Pal S, Vaishampayan U, Battle D, Staehler M. Patients experience with recurrence of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00523-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
|
14
|
Ehret F, Hofmann T, Fürweger C, Kufeld M, Staehler M, Muacevic A, Haidenberger A. Single-fraction prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer local recurrences. BJU Int 2023; 131:101-108. [PMID: 36114771 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the efficacy and safety of focal prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) local recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with PSMA-PET-positive PCa local recurrences treated with single-fraction SBRT between 2016 and 2020 were included. Identification for subsequent recurrences or metastatic spread based on increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated using PSMA-PET imaging. RESULTS A total of 64 patients were identified. Patients received various treatments before SBRT (31 patients with radical prostatectomy [RP], 18 external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] with RP, five EBRT, and the remaining 10 other combinations). The median follow-up was 21.6 months. The median PSA level before SBRT was 1.47 ng/mL. All patients received a single-fraction treatment with a median prescription dose and isodose line of 21 Gy and 65%, respectively. At the time of SBRT, six patients (9%) received an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PSA levels decreased after SBRT (P = 0.03) and three local recurrences were detected during the follow-up. The progression-free survival after 1-, 2-, and 3-years was 85.3%, 65.9%, and 51.2%, respectively. Six patients (9%) started ADT after SBRT due to disease progression. The rates of newly started ADT after 1-, 2-, and 3-years were 1.8%, 7.3%, and 22.7%, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities occurred in six patients (9%); no high-grade toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION While the available data for SBRT in the PCa local recurrence setting describe outcomes for fractionated irradiations, the findings of this first analysis of single-fraction, PSMA-PET- and mpMRI-guided focal SBRT are encouraging. Such treatment appears to be a safe, efficient, and time-saving therapy even in intensively pretreated patients. Recurrence-directed treatments can delay the use of ADT and could avoid prostate bed irradiation in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Ehret
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany.,European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Fürweger
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Kufeld
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Birnbacher L, Braunagel M, Willner M, Marschner M, De Marco F, Viermetz M, Auweter S, Notohamiprodjo S, Hellbach K, Notohamiprodjo M, Staehler M, Pfeiffer D, Reiser MF, Pfeiffer F, Herzen J. Quantitative differentiation of minimal-fat angiomyolipomas from renal cell carcinomas using grating-based x-ray phase-contrast computed tomography: An ex vivo study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0279323. [PMID: 37058505 PMCID: PMC10104346 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The differentiation of minimal-fat-or low-fat-angiomyolipomas from other renal lesions is clinically challenging in conventional computed tomography. In this work, we have assessed the potential of grating-based x-ray phase-contrast computed tomography (GBPC-CT) for visualization and quantitative differentiation of minimal-fat angiomyolipomas (mfAMLs) and oncocytomas from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) on ex vivo renal samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS Laboratory GBPC-CT was performed at 40 kVp on 28 ex vivo kidney specimens including five angiomyolipomas with three minimal-fat (mfAMLs) and two high-fat (hfAMLs) subtypes as well as three oncocytomas and 20 RCCs with eight clear cell (ccRCCs), seven papillary (pRCCs) and five chromophobe RCC (chrRCC) subtypes. Quantitative values of conventional Hounsfield units (HU) and phase-contrast Hounsfield units (HUp) were determined and histogram analysis was performed on GBPC-CT and grating-based attenuation-contrast computed tomography (GBAC-CT) slices for each specimen. For comparison, the same specimens were imaged at a 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. RESULTS We have successfully matched GBPC-CT images with clinical MRI and histology, as GBPC-CT presented with increased soft tissue contrast compared to absorption-based images. GBPC-CT images revealed a qualitative and quantitative difference between mfAML samples (58±4 HUp) and oncocytomas (44±10 HUp, p = 0.057) and RCCs (ccRCCs: 40±12 HUp, p = 0.012; pRCCs: 43±9 HUp, p = 0.017; chrRCCs: 40±7 HUp, p = 0.057) in contrast to corresponding laboratory attenuation-contrast CT and clinical MRI, although not all differences were statistically significant. Due to the heterogeneity and lower signal of oncocytomas, quantitative differentiation of the samples based on HUp or in combination with HUs was not possible. CONCLUSIONS GBPC-CT allows quantitative differentiation of minimal-fat angiomyolipomas from pRCCs and ccRCCs in contrast to absorption-based imaging and clinical MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Birnbacher
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Margarita Braunagel
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
| | - Marian Willner
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Mathias Marschner
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Fabio De Marco
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
- Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Trieste TS, Italy
| | - Manuel Viermetz
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Sigrid Auweter
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
| | - Susan Notohamiprodjo
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Katharina Hellbach
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, München, Germany
| | - Mike Notohamiprodjo
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Institute of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
| | - Daniela Pfeiffer
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
- Institute of Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Maximilian F Reiser
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, München, Germany
| | - Franz Pfeiffer
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
- Institute of Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| | - Julia Herzen
- Chair of Biomedical Physics, School of Natural Sciences & Department of Physics, Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Siva S, Ali M, Correa RJM, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis RJ, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, McLaughlin M, Morgan SC, Cury FL, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan ID, Chu W, Grubb W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Warner A, Louie AV. 5-year outcomes after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis from IROCK (the International Radiosurgery Consortium of the Kidney). Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1508-1516. [PMID: 36400098 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00656-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma, for which long-term data are awaited. The primary aim of this study was to report on long-term efficacy and safety of SABR for localised renal cell carcinoma. METHODS This study was an individual patient data meta-analysis, for which patients undergoing SABR for primary renal cell carcinoma across 12 institutions in five countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, and the USA) were eligible. Eligible patients had at least 2 years of follow-up, were aged 18 years or older, had any performance status, and had no previous local therapy. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. SABR was delivered as a single or multiple fractions of greater than 5 Gy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed local failure per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and was evaluated using cumulative incidence functions. FINDINGS 190 patients received SABR between March 23, 2007, and Sept 20, 2018. Single-fraction SABR was delivered in 81 (43%) patients and multifraction SABR was delivered in 109 (57%) patients. Median follow-up was 5·0 years (IQR 3·4-6·8). 139 (73%) patients were men, and 51 (27%) were women. Median age was 73·6 years (IQR 66·2-82·0). Median tumour diameter was 4·0 cm (IQR 2·8-4·9). 96 (75%) of 128 patients with available operability details were deemed inoperable by the referring urologist. 56 (29%) of 190 patients had a solitary kidney. Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 42·0-76·0) and decreased by 14·2 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 5·4-22·5) by 5 years post-SABR. Seven (4%) patients required dialysis post-SABR. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 5 years was 5·5% (95% CI 2·8-9·5) overall, with single-fraction SABR yielding fewer local failures than multifraction (Gray's p=0·020). There were no grade 3 toxic effects or treatment-related deaths. One (1%) patient developed an acute grade 4 duodenal ulcer and late grade 4 gastritis. INTERPRETATION SABR is effective and safe in the long term for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Single-fraction SABR might yield less local failure than multifraction, but further evidence from randomised trials is needed to elucidate optimal treatment schedules. These mature data lend further support for renal SABR as a treatment option for patients unwilling or unfit to undergo surgery. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Muhammad Ali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander Muacevic
- European Radiosurgery Center Munich, University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - Lee Ponsky
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hiroshi Onishi
- Department of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mark McLaughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Scott C Morgan
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anand Mahadevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irving D Kaplan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Chu
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William Grubb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University of Munich Hospitals, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrew Warner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rodler S, Kopliku R, Tamalunas A, Goetz M, Berg E, Staehler M, Causcuelli J. Outcomes of patients with discontinuation of immunotherapy due to immune related adverse events (irAE). EUR UROL SUPPL 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(22)02549-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
18
|
Volz Y, Troost J, Eismann L, Jokisch F, Schulz GB, Schlenker B, Kretschmer A, Staehler M, Boeck S, Waidelich R, Buchner A, Stief CG, Rodler S. The Burden of Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Genitourinary Cancers: A Prospective Study (NCT04535921). Oncol Res Treat 2022; 45:744-751. [PMID: 36162380 DOI: 10.1159/000527161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a challenging and often unaddressed concern, and predictive factors for high FCR remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess predictive factors for high FCR in patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall, 525 patients were prospectively included. FCR was measured using the validated FCR7 questionnaire prior to surgery and after receipt of the histological result. Family support, religiousness, quality-of-life impairment due to FCR, and distress were determined. Patient and tumor-related factors were compared with FCR levels using Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon test. Multivariate analysis was performed by linear/binary regression. RESULTS FCR after receipt of the final histology was significantly lower (median 13, range 6-34) than before surgery (median 15, range 6-36, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, significant impact on preoperative FCR was observed for gender (p = 0.017), age (p = 0.002), working status (p = 0.038), and education (p = 0.002). High impairment of QoL was associated with higher FCR levels (p < 0.001). Comparing tumor-related factors with FCR, we observed significantly higher FCR scores in patients with nonorgan-confined disease (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION This study is the first to describe FCR in patients with genitourinary cancers. Surgical treatment improves FCR. Sociodemographic factors like age, female gender, employment, and education were observed to influence FCR levels. Strong correlations between FCR, QoL, and psychological distress indicate the importance of further clinical screening for FCR. Tumor-related factors however seem to play a less prominent role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannic Volz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna Troost
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Friedrich Jokisch
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Boris Schlenker
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Boeck
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphaela Waidelich
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zschäbitz S, Mikuteit M, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Duensing S, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Erlmeier F, Steffens S. Expression of nectin-4 in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Discov Oncol 2022; 13:90. [PMID: 36136143 PMCID: PMC9500133 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-022-00558-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nectin-4 contributes to tumor proliferation, lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in malignant tumors and is an emerging target in tumor therapy. In renal cell carcinoma (RCC) VEGF-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors are currently treatments of choice. Enfortumab vedotin-ejf (EV) is an antibody drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4. The aim of our study was to investigate the expression of Nectin-4 in a large cohort of papillary RCC specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Specimens were derived from the PANZAR consortium (Erlangen, Heidelberg, Herne, Homburg, Mainz, Mannheim, Marburg, Muenster, LMU Munich, TU Munich, and Regensburg). Clinical data and tissue samples from n = 190 and n = 107 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively, were available. Expression of Nectin-4 was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS In total, Nectin-4 staining was moderately or strongly positive in of 92 (48.4%) of type 1 and 39 (36.4%) type 2 of pRCC cases. No associations between Nectin-4 expression and age at diagnosis, gender, grading, and TNM stage was found. 5 year overall survival rate was not statistically different in patients with Nectin-4 negative versus Nectin-4 positive tumors for the overall cohort and the pRCC type 2 subgroup, but higher in patient with Nectin-4 positive pRCC type 1 tumors compared to Nectin-4 negative tumors (81.3% vs. 67.8%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION Nectin-4 could not be confirmed as a prognostic marker in pRCC in general. Due to its high abundance on pRCC specimens Nectin-4 is an interesting target for therapeutical approaches e.g. with EV. Clinical trials are warranted to elucidate its role in the pRCC treatment landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Zschäbitz
- Dept. of Medical Oncology, National Center of Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Urology, Prosper-Hospital GmbH, 45659 Recklinghausen, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
- Present Address: Urological Group and Clinic Derouet/Pönicke/Becker, Boxberg Centre, 66538 Neunkirchen, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Asklepios Clinics Altona, 22763 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
- Present Address: Institute of Pathology/Gerhard-Domagk Institute, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421 Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Duensing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany
| | - Walburgis Brenner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Gynecology, University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik C. Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Urology, Kreiskliniken Altötting-Burghausen, 84489 Burghausen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef and University, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andres Jan Schrader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical School Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Dean’s Office – Curriculum Development, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Present Address: Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Correa R, Siva S, Muhammad A, Muacevic A, Ponsky L, Ellis R, Lo SS, Onishi H, Swaminath A, Mclaughlin M, Morgan S, Cury F, Teh BS, Mahadevan A, Kaplan I, Chu W, Hannan R, Staehler M, Warner A, Louie AV. 44: Long-Term Outcomes of SABR to Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-Centre Analysis from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK). Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)04323-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
21
|
Mondorf Y, Mikuteit M, Ivanyi P, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief CG, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Steffens S, Erlmeier F. The Prognostic Impact of PD-L2 in Papillary Renal-Cell Carcinoma. Urol Int 2022; 106:1168-1176. [PMID: 35654002 DOI: 10.1159/000525016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1) has been often studied in different types of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). For example, in clear-cell renal carcinoma it is well established that programmed death-1 receptor and PD-L1 are important prognostic markers. In contrast, the role of programmed death-2 ligand (PD-L2) as prognostic marker remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate if PD-L2 expression could play a role as a prognostic marker for papillary RCC (pRCC). METHODS The patients' sample collection was a joint collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n = 240 and n = 128 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of PD-L2 was determined by immunohistochemistry. In total, PD-L2 staining was evaluable in 185 of 240 type 1 and 99 of 128 type 2 pRCC cases. RESULTS PD-L2 staining was positive in 67 (36.2%) of type 1 and in 31 (31.3%) of type 2 pRCC specimens. The prevalence of PD-L2+ cells was significantly higher in high-grade type 1 tumors (p = 0.019) and in type 2 patients with metastasis (p = 0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis disclosed significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with PD-L2- compared to PD-L2+ in pRCC type 1 of 88.4% compared to 73.6% (p = 0.039) and type 2 of 78.8% compared to 39.1% % (p < 0.001). However, multivariate analysis did not identify the presence of PD-L2+ cells neither in type 1 nor type 2 pRCC as an independent predictor of poor OS. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION PD-L2 expression did not qualify as an independent prognostic marker in pRCC. Future studies will have to determine whether anti-PD-L2-targeted treatment may play a role in pRCC and expression can potentially serve as a predictive marker for these therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Mondorf
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, BDH Hospital Hessisch Oldendorf, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Department for Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien-Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.,Department for Rheumatology and Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mikuteit M, Zschäbitz S, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Steffens S, Erlmeier F. The prognostic impact of Claudin 6 in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 2022; 231:153802. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Rodler S, Schott M, Casuscelli J, Graser A, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Stief C, Staehler M. Robotic radiosurgery for the treatment of lung metastases of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(22)00462-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
24
|
Erlmeier F, Bruecher B, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Mondorf Y, Ivanyi P, Mikuteit M, Steffens S. cMET - a prognostic marker in papillary renal cell carcinoma? Hum Pathol 2022; 121:1-10. [PMID: 34998840 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The tyrosine-protein kinase c-Met plays a decisive role in numerous cellular processes, as a proto-oncogene that supports aggressive tumor behavior. It is still unknown whether c-Met could be relevant for prognosis of papillary RCC (pRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Specimen collection were a collaboration of the PANZAR consortium. Patients' medical history and tumor specimens were collected from n=197 and n=110 patients with type 1 and 2 pRCC, respectively. Expression of cMET was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS In total, cMET staining was evaluable in of 97/197 type 1 and 63/110 type 2 of pRCC cases. Five-years overall survival reviled no significant difference in dependence of cMET positivity (cMET- vs. cMET+: pRCC type 1: 84.8 % vs. 80.3 %, respectively (p=0.303, log-rank); type 2: 71.4 % vs. 64.4 % respectively (p= 0.239, log-rank)). Interestingly, the subgroup analyses showed a significant difference for cMET expression in T stage and metastases of the pRCC type 2 (p=0.014, p=0.022, chi-square). The cMET positive type 2 collective developed more metastases compared to the cMET negative cohort (pRCC Typ 2 M+: cMET-: 2 (4.3%) vs. cMET+: 12 (19%)). CONCLUSION CMET expression did not qualify as a prognostic marker in pRCC for overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
.
| | - Benedict Bruecher
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421
Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), 66421
Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, 81337 Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich
Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany
| | | | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich
Alexander University (FAU), 91058 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andres Jan Schrader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuernberg, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yvonne Mondorf
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Marie Mikuteit
- Hannover Medical School: Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Staehler M, Schuler T, Spek A, Rodler S, Tamalunas A, Fürweger C, Muacevic A. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Single Fraction Robotic Radiosurgery Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Oncological Outcomes. Cureus 2022; 14:e21623. [PMID: 35233307 PMCID: PMC8881236 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction High-dose local stereotactic robotic radiosurgery (RRS) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery in renal masses and selected patients. We have, so far, limited its use to the elderly and patients at high risk from surgery. In this study, we matched patients with renal tumors who were treated with single fraction RRS to patients who underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN). Methods Between January 2009 and December 2017, we included 571 consecutive patients undergoing OPN and 99 patients who underwent RRS in this retrospective analysis. Patients had to have a follow-up of at least six months and we were able to match 35 with a propensity score. Matching criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, age, clinical tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM), and tumor diameter. Tumor response, renal function, survival, and adverse events were evaluated every three months until progression or death. Results Median age was 65 years for RRS (range 58-75) and 71 (range 56-76) for OPN (p=0.131). Median diameter of renal tumors was 2.8 cm (range 2.4-3.9) for RRS and 3.5 cm (2.8-4.5) for OPN, p=0.104. Median follow-up was 28.1 months (range 6.0-78.3 months). Local tumor control nine months after RRS and OPN was 98% (95% CI: 89-99%). Renal function remained stable with a median creatinine clearance (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)) at baseline of 76.8mlmin/1.73m2 (range 25.3-126.3) and 70.3ml/min/1.73m2 (range 18.6-127.3) at follow-up (p=0.89). Median overall survival was not reached. No difference in overall survival (OS) was seen in RRS compared to OPN (p=0.459). Conclusions Single fraction RRS is an alternative to OPN in patients unfit for surgery. Oncological and functional results are comparable to those of OPN. Further studies are needed to determine long-term results and limits of RRS in this setting and in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Tina Schuler
- Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Annabel Spek
- Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Severin Rodler
- Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Alexander Tamalunas
- Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, DEU
| | - Christoph Fürweger
- Medical Physics, European CyberKnife Center, Munich, DEU.,Stereotaxy and Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, DEU
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zschäbitz S, Erlmeier F, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Mondorf Y, Hartmann A, Ivanyi P, Steffens S. Expression of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma - Overview and Report on a Large Multicenter Cohort. J Cancer 2022; 13:1706-1712. [PMID: 35399715 PMCID: PMC8990413 DOI: 10.7150/jca.63509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an emerging diagnostic and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. 68Ga-PSMA-labeled hybrid imaging is used for the detection of prostate primary tumors and metastases. Therapeutic applications such as Lutetium-177 PSMA radionuclide therapy or bispecific antibodies that target PSMA are currently under investigation within clinical trials. The expression of PSMA, however, is not specific to prostate-tissue. It has been described in the neovascular endothelium of different types of cancer such as breast cancer, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The aim of this study was to analyze PSMA expression in papillary RCC (pRCC) type 1 and type 2, the most common non-ccRCC subtypes, and to evaluate the potential of PSMA-targeted imaging and treatment in pRCC. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of primary tumors were analyzed for PSMA expression by immunohistochemistry. Out of n=374 pRCC specimens from the multicenter PANZAR consortium, n=197 pRCC type 1 and n=110 type 2 specimens were eligible for analysis and correlated with clinical data. In pRCC type 1 PSMA staining was positive in 4 of 197 (2.0%) samples whereas none (0/110) of the pRCC type 2 samples were positive for PSMA in this large cohort of pRCC patients. No significant PSMA expression was detected in pRCC. Reflecting current clinical evaluation of PMSA expression in RCC do not encourage further analysis in papillary subtypes.
Collapse
|
27
|
Schmidinger M, Motzer RJ, Rolland F, Staehler M, Rink M, Retz M, Csoszi T, McCaffrey JA, De Giorgi U, Caserta C, Duran I, Benzaghou F, Clary DO, Albiges L, Choueiri TK, Tannir NM. Analysis by region of outcomes for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib or everolimus: a sub-analysis of the METEOR study. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:52-57. [PMID: 34736367 PMCID: PMC9357268 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1995041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: METEOR was a phase 3 trial (NCT01865747) of cabozantinib versus everolimus in adults with advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC previously treated with VEGF receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This post hoc analysis of METEOR compared outcomes for patients recruited from European and non-European countries. Material and methods: Adults with advanced/metastatic clear cell RCC who had received ≥ 1 prior VEGFR-TKI treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or everolimus. Patients were categorized by recruitment region: Europe or outside of Europe (rest of world [RoW]). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between regional subgroups. Results: In total, there were 320 eligible patients from Europe (cabozantinib, 167; everolimus, 153) and 338 from RoW (North America, 240 patients; Asia-Pacific, 86; Latin America, 12; randomized as cabozantinib, 163; everolimus, 175). PFS and OS were longer with cabozantinib than with everolimus and similar for the Europe and RoW subgroups. For PFS, the hazard ratio (HR) for cabozantinib versus everolimus was 0.54 for the Europe subgroup (p < .001) and 0.50 for the RoW subgroup (p < .001). For OS, the HR was 0.75 for the Europe subgroup (p = .034) and 0.69 for the RoW subgroup (p = .006). ORR in the Europe subgroup was 15% for cabozantinib and 3.9% for everolimus (p < .001). For the RoW subgroup, ORR was 20% for cabozantinib and 2.9% for everolimus (p < .001). Incidence of grade 3/4 AEs were similar for the Europe (cabozantinib, 74%; everolimus, 58%) and RoW subgroups (cabozantinib, 69%; everolimus, 64%). Conclusion: In the METEOR trial, efficacy outcomes for patients recruited from European and non-European countries favored cabozantinib over everolimus. The efficacy and safety results for the regional subgroups were consistent with those of the overall METEOR population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tibor Csoszi
- Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
| | | | - Ugo De Giorgi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical and Translational Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | | | | | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Nizar M. Tannir
- MD Anderson Cancer Center Hospital, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Siva S, Ost P, Zaorsky N, Staehler M. Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Oligoprogressive Disease: A New Frontier in Kidney Cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 80:701-702. [PMID: 34563413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Experimental Cancer Research, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Nicholas Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University of Munich, Comprehensive Cancer Center Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Spek A, Graser A, Casuscelli J, Szabados B, Rodler S, Marcon J, Stief C, Staehler M. Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT-derived blood flow measurements enable early prediction of long term outcome in metastatic renal cell cancer patients on antiangiogenic treatment. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:13.e1-13.e8. [PMID: 34535355 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) as an independent non-invasive biomarker in predicting long term outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on antiangiogenic treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty two mRCC patients were prospectively enrolled from 09/2011 to 04/2015, out of which 71 were included in the final data analysis; the population was observed until 12/2020 to obtain complete overall survival data. DCE-CT imaging was performed at baseline and 10 to 12 weeks after start of treatment with targeted therapy. DCE-CT included a dynamic acquisition after injection of 50 ml of nonionic contrast agent at 6 ml/s using a 4D spiral mode (10 cm z-axis coverage, acquisition time 43 sec, 100 kVp (abdomen), 80 kVp (chest), 80-100 mAs) on a dual source scanner (Definition FLASH, Siemens). Blood flow (BF) was calculated for target tumor volumes using a deconvolution model. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics (SPSS version 24). RESULTS Patients were treated with either sunitinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, tivozanib, axitinib, or cabozantinib. A cut-off value of 50% blood flow reduction at follow-up allowed for identification of patients with favorable long-term outcome: Median OS in n = 42 patients with an average blood flow reduction of >50% (mean, 79%) was 34 (range, 14-54) months, while n = 21 patients with an average reduction of less than 50% (mean, 28%) showed a median OS of 12 (range, 6-18) months, and n = 8 patients with an increase in blood flow survived for a median of 7 (range, 3-11) months. CONCLUSION Blood flow in metastases measured with DCE-CT at first follow-up is a strong predictor of overall survival in mRCC patients on antiangiogenic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel Spek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Marcon
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Staehler M, Rodler S, Schott M, Casuscelli J, Stief C, Spek A, Schlenker B. Polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch (hemopatch ®) in open partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2021; 40:127-132. [PMID: 34480235 PMCID: PMC8813698 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03827-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the results of a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Hemopatch® on blood loss, surgical time and renal function in partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS Out of a single surgeon cohort of n = 565 patients undergoing conventional open PN (CPN) between 01/2015 and 12/2017 at the University of Munich a consecutive subgroup (n = 42) was operated on using a polyethylene glycol-coated collagen-based sealant Hemopatch® (Baxter International Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) (HPN). RESULTS Median age was 65.2 years (range 12.7-95.2) with median follow-up of 9.43 months (0.03-49.15). Baseline renal function (CKD-EPI) was 78.56 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 20.38-143.09) with a non-significant decline to 74.78 ml/min/1.73 m2 (range 3.75-167.74) at follow-up. In CPN 46% had low complexity, 33% moderate complexity and 20% high complexity lesions with 33% low, 40% moderate and 27% high complexity masses in HPN. Median tumor size was 4.3 cm (range 1-38 cm) in CPN with 4.8 cm (range 3.8-18.3 cm) with HPN, p = 0.293. Median blood loss and duration of surgery was significantly lower in the HPN group vs. CPN (146 ml ± 195 vs. 114 ml ± 159 ml; p = 0.021; 43 min ± 27 for HPN vs. 53 min ± 49; p = 0.035) with no difference in clamping time (12.6 min ± 8.6 for HPN vs. 12.0 min ± 9.5; p = 0.701). CONCLUSIONS Hemopatch® supported renoraphy shows promising results compared to standard renoraphy in PN. No side effects were seen. Further studies should evaluate the prevention of arterio-venous or urinary fistulas. In complex partial nephrectomies Hemopatch® supported renoraphy should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany. .,Multidisciplinary Center On Renal Tumors, Department of Urology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - S Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - M Schott
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - J Casuscelli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - C Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - A Spek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - B Schlenker
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Procopio G, Hamberg P, Bigot P, Suarez Rodriguez C, Barthelemy P, Eymard JC, Masini C, Gajate Borau P, Dutailly P, Perrot V, Staehler M. 672P Real-world study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after VEGF-targeted therapy (CASSIOPE): Interim data for patients who had received prior nivolumab. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
Mumm JN, Eismann L, Rodler S, Vilsmaier T, Zehni AZ, Apfelbeck M, Pfitzinger PL, Volz Y, Chaloupka M, Bauer RM, Stief CG, Staehler M. Listening to Music during Outpatient Cystoscopy Reduces Pain and Anxiety and Increases Satisfaction: Results from a Prospective Randomized Study. Urol Int 2021; 105:792-798. [PMID: 34280934 DOI: 10.1159/000517275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates the effect of classical music, music of patients' own choice, or no music on pain reduction during elective cystoscopy. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to describe the effect of listening to classical music, music of patients' own choice, or no music on patient's pain and satisfaction rates when carrying out an elective cystoscopy and the effect on the assessment capability of the performing urologist. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized trial included 127 patients undergoing elective cystoscopy at the Urological Department of the University Clinic of Munich between June 2019 and March 2020. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Patients were assigned randomly to 3 groups: group I: listening to standardized classical music (n = 35), group II: listening to music according to the patients' choice (n = 34), and control group III: no music (n = 44). Prior to cystoscopy, anxiety levels were assessed by the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 1-100) was used for a self-assessment of pain, discomfort, and satisfaction. Statistical analysis was done with Spearman's rank correlation and t-tests. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median age was 63 (range 27-91) years. The duration of cystoscopy was 5.7 (1-30) min. Patients had undergone a median of 2.3 cystoscopies in the past. Between giving informed consent and cystoscopy, patients had to wait for a median of 64 (0-260) min. The median VAS pain score was significantly lower in group I at 1.7 and group II at 2.3 versus 5.2 in the control group III (p < 0.001). The control group III had significantly worse pain and patient satisfaction rates compared with groups I and II. Group I had a significant lower VAS pain score than groups II and III (p < 0.001). Classical music also increased the assessment capability of the preforming urologist. CONCLUSIONS Listening to music during elective cystoscopy significantly reduces pain and distress and leads to higher patient and surgeon satisfaction. We recommend listening to classical music or music chosen by the patients during outpatient flexible/rigid cystoscopy in daily clinical routine. Patient Summary: In this study, we found that patients who listened to classical music or music of their own choice while undergoing a cystoscopy showed significant reduction of pain and distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa Vilsmaier
- Department of Gynacology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Alaleh Zati Zehni
- Department of Gynacology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Apfelbeck
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Paulo L Pfitzinger
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Yannic Volz
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Chaloupka
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Ricarda M Bauer
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximlians-University Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mumm JN, Vilsmaier T, Schuetz JM, Rodler S, Zati Zehni A, Bauer RM, Staehler M, Stief CG, Batz F. How the COVID-19 Pandemic Affects Sexual Behavior of Hetero-, Homo-, and Bisexual Males in Germany. Sex Med 2021; 9:100380. [PMID: 34273787 PMCID: PMC8360921 DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic drastically altered the way of life around the world. Due to social distancing measures, contact restrictions and fears of infection, social life has changed significantly. These measures along with the stressors associated with the current worldwide situation, will inevitably have an effect on people's interpersonal and personal behaviors. Aim This study evaluates the effect the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide German lockdown had on the sexual behavior of cis men. Methods An anonymous nationwide web-based questionnaire was conducted among cis men in Germany during the first COVID-19 home isolation (April 20, 2020–July 20, 2020). The questionnaire was distributed via e-mail, online chats and social-media platforms. Main Outcome Measures Data was collected on general characteristics including demographics and socio-economic backgrounds. To evaluate sexual health, questions from the Sexual Behavior Questionnaire were included. Results 523 cis male participated. 414 met the inclusion criteria. Most were heterosexual (n = 248, 59.9%; vs homosexual n = 97, 23.4%; vs bisexual n = 69, 16.7%). 243 (59%) were employed, 153 (37.1%) were students and 16 (3.9%) were unemployed. Most of the participants reported an annual income lower than 75.000€. During the lockdown, average weekly frequency of sexual intercourse and masturbation was increased in all groups. Consistently, a significant rise of higher satisfaction with the frequency of sexual contacts during the quarantine was observed (P < .05). Furthermore, the level of sexual arousal increased significantly in all groups (P < .0005). Capability to enjoy sexual intercourse or masturbation increased significantly in heterosexual (P < .0005) and homosexual men (P < .005). Bisexual participants showed a significant increase in general satisfaction with sexual life (P < .05) and a significant decrease in satisfaction in relationship or single life (P < .05). Positive confounders in the changing of sexual behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic were: Being in a relationship or being single, parenthood and being employed. Conclusion Our study firstly describes how COVID-19 pandemic related restrictions and social distancing measurements altered sexual behavior amongst cis male in Germany. Further studies, including sexual minorities specifically, are needed to clarify if the behavior in the first German nationwide quarantine has persisted or transformed as the pandemic proceeded. Mumm J-N, Vilsmaier T, Schuetz JM, et al. How the COVID-19 Pandemic Affects Sexual Behavior of Hetero-, Homo-, and Bisexual Males in Germany. Sex Med 2021;9:100380.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Theresa Vilsmaier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julius M Schuetz
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alaleh Zati Zehni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ricarda M Bauer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Falk Batz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rodler S, Schütz JM, Styn A, Weinhold P, Casucelli J, Eismann L, Bauer RM, Staehler M, Stief C, Buchner A, Mumm JN. Mapping Telemedicine in German Private Practice Urological Care: Implications for Transitioning beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Urol Int 2021; 105:650-656. [PMID: 33951666 PMCID: PMC8247820 DOI: 10.1159/000515982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background There are limited data on the use and concern of telemedicine among German urologists, and thus, there are no established guidelines for telemedical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of urological indications. Methods An anonymized survey was conducted among German private practice urologists during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The χ<sup>2</sup> test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for statistical analysis. Results 257 urologists were included in the final analysis. Thirty-five (14.0%) of urologists had used telemedicine as part of their consultation, and 221 (86.0%) had not used telemedicine. There was no difference between telemedicine adoption rates between rural and urban settings. Telemedicine users were significantly more satisfied with the information they had received regarding telemedicine issues. Users saw the greatest barrier to telemedicine that patients do not take up the offer of telemedicine. Nonusers were most concerned with unclear indications for telemedicine followed by lesser reimbursements during telemedicine than in-person visitations. Users were significantly more likely to use telemedicine beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Urologists, who wanted to use the service in the future, wanted an active support by the German society of urology and guidelines for telemedicine. Last, users and nonusers preferred telemedicine for non-acute chronic diseases and follow-up visitations. Conclusion Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine remains a rarely used service among German private practice urologists. Ultimately, to overcome the current challenges, urologists require an active support for the service through the German Society of Urology and telemedical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Severin Rodler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Arbeitsgruppe für Anwendung von künstlicher Intelligenz und digitalen Gesundheits-anwendungen in der Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Julius M Schütz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Amelie Styn
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Weinhold
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jozefina Casucelli
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Lennert Eismann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Ricarda M Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Arbeitsgruppe für Anwendung von künstlicher Intelligenz und digitalen Gesundheits-anwendungen in der Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Arbeitsgruppe für Anwendung von künstlicher Intelligenz und digitalen Gesundheits-anwendungen in der Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mittlmeier LM, Ledderose ST, Schott M, Brendel M, Beyer L, Theurich S, Mayr D, Walz C, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Staehler M, Unterrainer M. Immature Plasma Cell Myeloma Mimics Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Due to Endothelial PSMA-Expression. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:423. [PMID: 33802288 PMCID: PMC8000301 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We present a 71-year-old female patient who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for suspected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as RCC also shows high PSMA-expression in tumor neovascularization. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed a high PSMA-avidity in the renal tumor, enlarged intra-abdominal and mediastinal lymph nodes. Moreover, PSMA-positive pleural, pulmonal and osseous lesions were found. However, histopathology revealed an immature plasma cell myeloma with an endothelial PSMA-expression of the neovasculature. This case illustrates the increased PSMA-avidity in multiple myeloma and highlights PSMA as a potential theragnostic target in multiple myeloma. For clinical routine, lymphatic diseases such as extramedullary myeloma should be considered as differential diagnosis in PSMA-avid renal masses on PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M. Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Stephan T. Ledderose
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Melanie Schott
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Sebastian Theurich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Doris Mayr
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Christoph Walz
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (S.T.L.); (D.M.); (C.W.)
| | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (L.M.M.); (M.B.); (L.B.); (P.B.); (H.I.)
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.S.); (M.S.)
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (W.G.K.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schnitzer ML, Sabel L, Schwarze V, Marschner C, Froelich MF, Nuhn P, Falck Y, Nuhn MM, Afat S, Staehler M, Rückel J, Clevert DA, Rübenthaler J, Geyer T. Structured Reporting in the Characterization of Renal Cysts by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) Using the Bosniak Classification System-Improvement of Report Quality and Interdisciplinary Communication. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020313. [PMID: 33671991 PMCID: PMC7919270 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of structured reporting (SR) compared to conventional free-text reporting (FTR) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic renal lesions, based on the Bosniak classification. METHODS Fifty patients with cystic renal lesions who underwent CEUS were included in this single-center study. FTR created in clinical routine were compared to SR retrospectively generated by using a structured reporting template. Two experienced urologists evaluated the reports regarding integrity, effort for information extraction, linguistic quality, and overall quality. RESULTS The required information could easily be extracted by the reviewers in 100% of SR vs. 82% of FTR (p < 0.001). The reviewers trusted the information given by SR significantly more with a mean of 5.99 vs. 5.52 for FTR (p < 0.001). SR significantly improved the linguistic quality (6.0 for SR vs. 5.68 for FTR (p < 0.001)) and the overall report quality (5.98 for SR vs. 5.58 for FTR (p < 0.001)). CONCLUSIONS SR significantly increases the quality of radiologic reports in CEUS examinations of cystic renal lesions compared to conventional FTR and represents a promising approach to facilitate interdisciplinary communication in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz L. Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Laura Sabel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Constantin Marschner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Yannick Falck
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Maria-Magdalena Nuhn
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Saif Afat
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Johannes Rückel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (M.L.S.); (L.S.); (V.S.); (C.M.); (Y.F.); (M.-M.N.); (J.R.); (D.-A.C.); (J.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89440073620
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Campi R, Stewart GD, Staehler M, Dabestani S, Kuczyk MA, Shuch BM, Finelli A, Bex A, Ljungberg B, Capitanio U. Novel Liquid Biomarkers and Innovative Imaging for Kidney Cancer Diagnosis: What Can Be Implemented in Our Practice Today? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:22-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
38
|
Apfelbeck M, Staehler M, Rodler S, Stredele R, Chaloupka M, Mumm JN, Buchner A, Stief C, Casuscelli J. Does Pandemic Anxiety Affect Urology Health Care Workers? Urol Int 2021; 105:192-198. [PMID: 33477161 PMCID: PMC7900483 DOI: 10.1159/000512911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess anxiety, stress level, and perception of safety during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in health care workers (HCWs) of one of Germany's largest urology university clinics. METHODS A cross-sectional study among urological HCWs was performed. HCWs were surveyed for anxiety about the pandemic, stress level and current workload, fear of coronavirus infection, current perception of safety at work, and attitude towards protective equipment and tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). RESULTS Sixty-three HCWs filled in the questionnaire. Overall anxiety of infection with CO-VID-19 is at a median of 4.7 with no statistically significant difference between nurses and physicians (p = 0.0749). Safety at work reaches a median of 6 out of 10. In fact, the highest fear in 56.7% (31/63) of the personnel is to get infected by a colleague tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 despite wearing surgical face masks. A proportion of 55.7 and 74.6% highly favor swabs for SARS-CoV-2 on a regular basis in HCWs and patients, respectively (p = 0.0001). Workload in the urology department is clearly reduced during the pandemic (physicians 39.3% vs. nurses 32.2%, p = 0.0001) and 57.4% do not feel distress at all; only 27.9% express mental distress. CONCLUSION During the pandemic, urology HCWs perceive lower burden by workload and deem themselves at low risk of infection. However, the greatest anxiety is related to infection by a SARS-CoV-2-positive colleague, despite reciprocal protection by surgical face masks. This highlights a relevant mental stress and uncertainty towards management of infected HCWs, calling for increased education and psychological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Apfelbeck
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Severin Rodler
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Regina Stredele
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Chaloupka
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan-Niclas Mumm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bentley S, Johnson C, Exall E, Brohan E, Lawrance R, Bennett B, Bargo D, Zanotti G, Staehler M, Stewart GD. Improving patient-clinician communication following nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma: Development, content validation and pilot testing of a conversation aid tool. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:99-108. [PMID: 32660743 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study developed, and established the content validity, of a conversation aid tool (CAT) for use in clinical practice with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who receive a curative nephrectomy and are at high-risk of recurrence. The CAT was pilot tested in a sample of RCC patients to establish whether the CAT increases knowledge of RCC, treatment options (such as adjuvant therapy), and care options. METHODS A cross-sectional, mixed methods design was used involving initial, exploratory interviews with RCC patients, RCC specialists and a steering group. Further content validation interviews were conducted with RCC patients and specialists. A web-based survey was conducted with RCC patients (N = 60), to compare the CAT versus a standard of care (SOC) consultation comparator tool on patient knowledge. RESULTS Findings from exploratory interviews were used to develop the CAT. Content validation interviews demonstrated that the CAT was well understood and relevant to RCC patients. The web-based survey demonstrated that viewing the CAT significantly improved participants knowledge of RCC, and care options, when compared to the SOC. CONCLUSION The findings highlight that the CAT is a relevant, comprehensive and well-understood tool for use in the post-nephrectomy consultation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Use of the CAT may increase patient knowledge of RCC and care options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bentley
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, UK.
| | - Chloe Johnson
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, UK
| | | | - Elaine Brohan
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, UK
| | | | - Bryan Bennett
- Patient-Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, UK
| | - Danielle Bargo
- Pfizer Inc., 235E 42nd, New York, NY, 10017, United States
| | | | | | - Grant D Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mittlmeier LM, Unterrainer M, Rodler S, Todica A, Albert NL, Burgard C, Cyran CC, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Stief CG, Ilhan H, Staehler M. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for response assessment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma undergoing tyrosine kinase or checkpoint inhibitor therapy: preliminary results. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 48:2031-2037. [PMID: 33369689 PMCID: PMC8113284 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05165-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Tyrosine kinase (TKI) and checkpoint inhibitors (CI) prolonged overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Early prediction of treatment response is highly desirable for the individualization of patient management and improvement of therapeutic outcome; however, serum biochemistry is unable to predict therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, we compared 18F-PSMA-1007 PET imaging for response assessment in mRCC patients undergoing TKI or CI therapy compared to CT-based response assessment as the current imaging reference standard. Methods 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was performed in mRCC patients prior to initiation of systemic treatment and 8 weeks after therapy initiation. Treatment response was evaluated separately on 18F-PSMA-PET and CT. Changes on PSMA-PET (SUVmean) were assessed on a per patient basis using a modified PERCIST scoring system. Complete response (CRPET) was defined as absence of any uptake in all target lesions on posttreatment PET. Partial response (PRPET) was defined as decrease in summed SUVmean of > 30%. The appearance of new, PET-positive lesions or an increase in summed SUVmean of > 30% was defined as progressive disease (PDPET). A change in summed SUVmean of ± 30% defined stable disease (SDPET). RECIST 1.1 criteria were used for response assessment on CT. Results of radiographic response assessment on PSMA-PET and CT were compared. Results Overall, 11 mRCC patients undergoing systemic treatment were included. At baseline PSMA-PET1, all mRCC patients showed at least one PSMA-avid lesion. On follow-up PET2, 3 patients showed CRPET, 3 PRPET, 4 SDPET, and 1 PDPET. According to RECIST 1.1, 1 patient showed PRCT, 9 SDCT, and 1 PDCT. Overall, concordant classifications were found in only 2 cases (2 SDCT + PET). Patients with CRPET on PET were classified as 3 SDCT on CT using RECIST 1.1. By contrast, the patient classified as PRCT on CT showed PSMA uptake without major changes during therapy (SDPET). However, among 9 patients with SDCT on CT, 3 were classified as CRPET, 3 as PRPET, 1 as PDPET, and only 2 as SDPET on PSMA-PET. Conclusion On PSMA-PET, heterogeneous courses were observed during systemic treatment in mRCC patients with highly diverging results compared to RECIST 1.1. In the light of missing biomarkers for early response assessment, PSMA-PET might allow more precise response assessment to systemic treatment, especially in patients classified as SD on CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Mittlmeier
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Rodler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Burgard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C G Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Head Interdisciplinary Center on Renal Tumors, Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Schwarze V, Rübenthaler J, Čečatka S, Marschner C, Froelich MF, Sabel BO, Staehler M, Knösel T, Geyer T, Clevert DA. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the Evaluation of Bosniak III Complex Renal Cystic Lesions-A 10-Year Specialized European Single-Center Experience with Histopathological Validation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56120692. [PMID: 33322683 PMCID: PMC7763943 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56120692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing Bosniak III complex renal cystic lesions with histopathological validation. Materials and Methods: 49 patients with CEUS-categorized Bosniak III renal cystic lesions were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) between 2010-2020. Eight and five patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), respectively. Twenty-nine underwent (partial) nephrectomy allowing for histopathological analysis. The applied contrast agent for CEUS was a second-generation blood pool agent. Ultrasonography examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist with more than 15 years of experience (EFSUMB Level 3). Results: CEUS examinations were successfully performed in all included patients without registering any adverse effects. The malignancy rate of CEUS-categorized Bosniak III renal lesions accounted for 66%. Initially, cystic complexity was visualized in native B-mode. In none of the renal lesions hypervascularization was detected in Color Doppler. CEUS allowed for detection of contrast enhancement patterns in all included Bosniak III renal lesions. Delayed wash-out could be detected in 6/29 renal lesions. In two cases of histopathologically confirmed clear-cell RCC, appropriate up-grading from Bosniak IIF to III was achieved by CEUS. Conclusions: CEUS depicts a promising imaging modality for the precise diagnostic workup and stratification of renal cystic lesions according to the Bosniak classification system, thereby helping guidance of adequate clinical management in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Saša Čečatka
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Constantin Marschner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Matthias Frank Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Bastian Oliver Sabel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-73620
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (V.S.); (J.R.); (S.Č.); (C.M.); (B.O.S.); (D.-A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Staehler M, Stöckle M, Christoph DC, Stenzl A, Potthoff K, Grimm MO, Klein D, Harde J, Brüning F, Goebell PJ, Augustin M, Roos F, Benz-Rüd I, Marschner N, Grünwald V. Everolimus after failure of one prior VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final results of the MARC-2 trial. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:1685-1694. [PMID: 33070307 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
MARC-2, a prospective, multicenter phase IV trial, aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus after failure of one initial vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) therapy and to identify subgroups benefiting most, based on clinical characteristics and biomarkers. Patients with clear cell mRCC failing one initial VEGFR-TKI received everolimus until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival rate (6moPFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety. Between 2011 and 2015, 63 patients were enrolled. Median age was 65.4 years (range 43.3-81.1). 6moPFS was 39.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-51.3) overall, 54.4% (95% CI, 35.2-70.1) vs 23.7% (95% CI, 10.5-39.9) for patients aged ≥65 vs <65 years and 51.4% (95% CI, 34.7-65.7) vs 18.2% (95% CI, 5.7-36.3) for patients with body mass index (BMI) >25 vs ≤25 kg/m2 . A Cox proportional hazards model confirmed a longer PFS for patients aged ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.80) and a longer OS for patients with BMI >25 kg/m2 (HR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18-0.71). Median PFS and median OS were 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.2) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.3-24.3). ORR was 7.9% and disease control rate was 60.3%. No new safety signals emerged. Most common adverse events were stomatitis (31.7%), fatigue (31.7%), and anemia (30.2%). One patient died from treatment-related upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Everolimus remains a safe and effective treatment option for mRCC patients after one prior VEGFR-TKI therapy. Patients aged ≥65 years and patients with BMI >25 kg/m2 benefited most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Interdisciplinary Center of Renal Tumors, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg (Saar), Germany
| | - Daniel C Christoph
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karin Potthoff
- Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | | | - Dunja Klein
- Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Johanna Harde
- Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Fabian Brüning
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter J Goebell
- Department of Urology and Clinic for Haematology and Internistic Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Ambulatory Uro-Oncological Therapy Unit Erlangen (AURONTE), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marinela Augustin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Nuremberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - Frederik Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Iris Benz-Rüd
- Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Norbert Marschner
- Outpatient-Centre for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Haematology, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Clinic for Internal Medicine (Tumour Research) and Clinic for Urology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patel A, Ravaud A, Motzer RJ, Pantuck AJ, Staehler M, Escudier B, Martini JF, Lechuga M, Lin X, George DJ. Exploratory analysis of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio prognostic value in the adjuvant renal cell cancer setting. Future Oncol 2020; 17:403-409. [PMID: 33028084 PMCID: PMC8488532 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To examine the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the adjuvant renal cell carcinoma setting. Materials & methods: Patients received adjuvant sunitinib (50 mg/day; 4 weeks on/2 weeks off) or placebo. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Results: In 609 patients, DFS was similar for baseline PLR <140 versus ≥140 overall (median: 6.4 vs 5.9 years; hazard ratio: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7–1.2). A ≥25% decrease in PLR at week 4 overall was associated with longer DFS versus no change (hazard ratio: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6–1.0). Conclusion: Baseline PLR was not prognostic for DFS with adjuvant sunitinib treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00375674 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alain Ravaud
- Bordeaux University Hospital, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Robert J Motzer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Allan J Pantuck
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90094, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Xun Lin
- Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA 92121, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Schwarze V, Rübenthaler J, Marschner C, Fabritius MP, Rueckel J, Fink N, Puhr-Westerheide D, Gresser E, Froelich MF, Schnitzer ML, Große Hokamp N, Afat S, Staehler M, Geyer T, Clevert DA. Advanced Fusion Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Imaging (CT/MRI-CEUS) in Oncology. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12102821. [PMID: 33007933 PMCID: PMC7600560 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Fusion imaging depicts an innovative technique by which previously performed computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can be integrated and reconstructed with advanced contrast-enhanced ultrasound using modern ultrasound devices in a real-time manner. Fusion imaging allows for complementing strengths and reducing restrictions of the combined imaging modalities. The visualization of parenchymal and tumoral microperfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound can be dynamically fused and assessed with images from previous cross-sectional studies and may help to decipher underlying entities of indeterminate lesions or validate suspicious morphology. The findings from our study demonstrate the benefits of fusion imaging for evaluating focal hepatic and renal lesions. The excellent safety profile, accessibility, repeatability and cost-effectiveness are advantages of fusion imaging which make it a powerful diagnostic tool for the modern radiologist. Abstract Fusion imaging depicts an innovative technique that facilitates combining assets and reducing restrictions of advanced ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the role of fusion imaging for assessing hepatic and renal lesions. Between 02/2011–08/2020, 92 patients in total were included in the study, of which 32 patients had hepatic lesions, 60 patients had renal lesions. Fusion imaging was technically successful in all patients. No adverse side effects upon intravenous (i.v.) application of SonoVue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy) were registered. Fusion imaging could clarify all 11 (100%) initially as indeterminate described hepatic lesions by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Moreover, 5/14 (36%) initially suspicious hepatic lesions could be validated by fusion imaging, whereas in 8/14 (57%), malignant morphology was disproved. Moreover, fusion imaging allowed for the clarification of 29/30 (97%) renal lesions initially characterized as suspicious by CT/MRI, of which 19/30 (63%) underwent renal surgery, histopathology revealed malignancy in 16/19 (84%), and benignity in 3/19 (16%). Indeterminate findings could be elucidated by fusion imaging in 20/20 (100%) renal lesions. Its accessibility and repeatability, even during pregnancy and in childhood, its cost-effectiveness, and its excellent safety profile, make fusion imaging a promising instrument for the thorough evaluation of hepatic and renal lesions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Schwarze
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4400-73620
| | - Johannes Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Constantin Marschner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Matthias Philipp Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Johannes Rueckel
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Nicola Fink
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Daniel Puhr-Westerheide
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Eva Gresser
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Matthias Frank Froelich
- Institute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany;
| | - Moritz Ludwig Schnitzer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Nils Große Hokamp
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Saif Afat
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany;
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | - Thomas Geyer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; (J.R.); (C.M.); (M.P.F.); (J.R.); (N.F.); (D.P.-W.); (E.G.); (M.L.S.); (T.G.); (D.-A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bergerot CD, Battle D, Philip EJ, Bergerot PG, Msaouel P, Smith A'B, Bamgboje AE, Shuch B, Derweesh IH, Jonasch E, Stern AP, Pal SK, Staehler M. Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Patients With Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:e1264-e1271. [PMID: 32955409 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with cancer commonly report distress and fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) impacting quality of life and clinical outcomes. This study aims to test the association between emotional well-being and clinical characteristics of survivors with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Survivors with localized RCC were invited to participate in this study through social media by the Kidney Cancer Research Alliance. Participants self-reported clinical characteristics, distress (Distress Thermometer), and FCR (Fear of Cancer Recurrence-7). Ordinal regression was used to test the association between emotional well-being and patient characteristics. RESULTS A total of 412 survivors were included in this analysis. Participants were mostly female (79.4%) and well educated (58.3%), with a median age of 54 years (range, 30-80 years) and median time since diagnosis of 17.5 months. More than one half were diagnosed with stage I disease (56.1%). Most patients (62.3%) had a clear understanding of their diagnosis. A high prevalence of moderate to severe distress (67.0%) and FCR (54.9%) was reported across all survivors of RCC. Higher FCR was associated with female gender, younger age, and lack of understanding of their diagnosis (P = .001), whereas more recent diagnosis was associated with higher distress levels (P = .01). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that FCR is a common problem that is persistent after therapy and that certain individuals, including female and younger patients, may be at particular risk of experiencing clinically relevant FCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiane Decat Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Dena Battle
- Kidney Cancer Research Alliance, Alexandria, VA
| | - Errol J Philip
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Paulo Gustavo Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Allan 'Ben' Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adeola Esther Bamgboje
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brian Shuch
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Eric Jonasch
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Staehler M, Battle D, Pal SK, Bergerot CD. Counterbalancing COVID-19 with Cancer Surveillance and Therapy: A Survey of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:1355-1362. [PMID: 32943372 PMCID: PMC7486070 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background While providers are challenged with treatment decisions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, decision making ultimately falls in the hands of patients—at present, their perspective is poorly understood. Objective To ascertain renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients’ perspectives on COVID-19 and understand the associated implications for treatment. Design, setting, and participants An online survey of RCC patients was conducted from March 22 to March 25, 2020, disseminated through social media and patient networking platforms. The survey comprised 45 items, including baseline demographic, clinicopathologic, and treatment-related information. Patients were additionally queried regarding their anxiety level related to COVID-19 and associated implications for their cancer diagnosis. Intervention An online survey study. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Descriptive statistics with graphical outputs were used to characterize survey results. Results and limitations A total of 539 patients (male:female 39%:58%) from 14 countries responded. Of them, 71% felt that their risk of COVID-19 infection was higher than the general population, and 27% contacted their physician to establish this. Among patients with localized disease (40%), most (42%) had scheduled surveillance scans within 6 wk–65% were unwilling to delay scans. Among patients with metastatic disease, 76% were receiving active therapy. While most patients preferred not to defer therapy (51%), patients receiving immune therapy regimens were less amenable to deferring therapy than those receiving targeted treatment (20% vs 47%). Conclusions Despite high levels of anxiety surrounding COVID-19, many patients with RCC were inclined to adhere to existing schedules of surveillance (localized disease) and systemic treatment (metastatic disease). Patient summary The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has prompted many doctors to develop different treatment strategies for cancer and other chronic conditions. Given the importance of the patient voice in these strategies, we conducted a survey of patients with kidney cancer to determine their treatment preferences. Our survey highlighted that most patients prefer to continue their current strategies of kidney cancer treatment and monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Dena Battle
- Kidney Cancer Research Alliance (KCCure), Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Sumanta Kumar Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Cristiane Decat Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Procopio G, Hamberg P, Bigot P, Suarez C, Barthélémy P, Eymard JC, Masini C, Gajate Borau P, Dutailly P, Perrot V, Staehler M. 730P Interim analysis of CASSIOPE: A real-world study of cabozantinib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) after VEGF-targeted therapy in Europe. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
48
|
Staehler M, Panic A, Goebell PJ, Merling M, Potthoff K, Herrmann E, de Geeter P, Vannier C, Hogrefe C, Marschner N, Grünwald V. First-line pazopanib in intermediate- and poor-risk patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Final results of the FLIPPER trial. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:950-960. [PMID: 32738823 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Temsirolimus has long been the only approved first-line standard of care (SOC) with overall survival (OS) benefit in poor-risk patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). However, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also commonly used in clinical practice. Pazopanib is an SOC for first-line mRCC treatment, but for poor-risk patients data are scarce. The FLIPPER (First-Line Pazopanib in Poor-Risk Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma) study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of first-line pazopanib in poor-risk mRCC patients. FLIPPER was a single-arm, multicenter, Phase IV trial. Key inclusion criteria were treatment-naive clear cell, inoperable advanced or mRCC, poor-risk according to MSKCC with slight modification, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥60% and adequate organ function. Oral pazopanib 800 mg was given daily. Primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFS6). Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. For analysis, descriptive statistics were used. Between 2012 and 2016, 60 patients had been included. Forty-three patients qualified for safety analyses, 34 for efficacy. Median age was 66 years, 64.7% of patients were poor-risk, 82.4% had a KPS ≤70%. PFS6 was 35.3% (95% CI, 19.7-53.5). Median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.6-7.8) and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.6-22.2), respectively. ORR was 32.4% (95% CI, 17.4-50.5), median DOR 9.7 months (95% CI, 1.8-12.4). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse event reported in 4.7% of patients was hypertension. No treatment-related death occurred. Since pazopanib is active and well tolerated in poor-risk patients with clear cell mRCC, our results support its use as first-line treatment in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, Interdisciplinary Center of Renal Tumors, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrej Panic
- Department of Urology, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Peter J Goebell
- Ambulatory Uro-Oncological Therapy Unit Erlangen (AURONTE), Department of Urology and Clinic for Haematology and Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marie Merling
- Department of Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Karin Potthoff
- Medical Department, iOMEDICO, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.,Outpatient-Centre for Urology "Die Urologen am Ring", Muenster, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Norbert Marschner
- Outpatient-Centre for Interdisciplinary Oncology and Haematology, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Viktor Grünwald
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Internal Medicine (Tumour Research) and Clinic for Urology, West German Cancer Center, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Erlmeier F, Steffens S, Stöhr C, Herrmann E, Polifka I, Agaimy A, Trojan L, Ströbel P, Becker F, Wülfing C, Barth P, Stöckle M, Staehler M, Stief C, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Macher-Göppinger S, Wullich B, Noldus J, Brenner W, Roos FC, Walter B, Otto W, Burger M, Schrader AJ, Hartmann A, Ivanyi P. Characterization of PD-1 and PD-L1 Expression in Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Large Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:53-59.e1. [PMID: 32778505 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) play a decisive role as prognostic markers in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). To date, the role of PD-1/PD-L1 as a prognostic marker in papillary RCC (pRCC) remains scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients' sample collection was a joint collaboration of the nationwide PANZAR consortium - a multicenter study. Medical history and tumor specimens were collected from 245 and 129 patients with pRCC types 1 and 2, respectively. Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 was determined by immunohistochemistry in pRCC and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells. RESULTS Of 374 pRCC specimens, 204 type 1 and 97 type 2 were evaluable for PD-1 and PD-L1 expression analysis. In total, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were found in 8 (4.9%) of 162 and 12 (7.2%) of 166 evaluable pRCC type 1 specimens. Comparably, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were found in 2 (2.4%) of 83 and 5 (6.2%) of 81 evaluable pRCC type 2 specimens. Hardly any clinically relevant associations between PD-1 and PD-L1 positivity and clinicopathologic or clinical courses were observed, neither in pRCC type 1 nor type 2. CONCLUSION The analysis of a large pRCC cohort from a multicenter consortium revealed no impact of PD-1/PD-L1 expression on prognosis in patients with pRCC with predominantly limited disease status, neither for type 1 nor type 2. However, the impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 in more advanced pRCC disease needs further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Erlmeier
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Steffens
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany; Immune Cooperativ Oncology Group (ICOG) of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Lower-Saxoney (CCC-N), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Christine Stöhr
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Edwin Herrmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Iris Polifka
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Abbas Agaimy
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lutz Trojan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ströbel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Frank Becker
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Christian Wülfing
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Barth
- Department of Urology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland (UKS), Homburg, Germany
| | - Michael Staehler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Haferkamp
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Bernd Wullich
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Bernhard Walter
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Otto
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich Alexander University (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Philipp Ivanyi
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Immune Cooperativ Oncology Group (ICOG) of the Comprehensive Cancer Center Lower-Saxoney (CCC-N), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rodler S, Schott M, Tamalunas A, Marcon J, Graser A, Casuscelli J, Stief C, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Staehler M. Safety and efficacy of Cyberknife radiosurgery for visceral and lymph node metastases of renal cell carcinoma – a retrospective, single center analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33445-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|