Maternal and neonatal group B streptococcus colonisation: A systematic review and the meta-analysis of matched-pair studies

AIM

To determine the prevalence of group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage among parturient women and neonates, and the relative risk of vertical transmission, the relative risk of early and late-onset GBS and the pooled incidence of early-late-onset GBS infection.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant cohort studies from three electronic databases to identify all relevant studies published up to 7 November 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 54 articles with 355 787 matched pairs of parturient women and neonates from 30 countries were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of GBS colonisation was 17.1% among the pregnant women and 1.0% among neonates. The pooled prevalence of vertical transmission of GBS was 4.5% and the pooled relative risk of GBS colonisation of neonates born to mothers with GBS was 9.9.

CONCLUSION

We support the implementation of targeted intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for all women who are positive for GBS as well as women with risks factors for early onset GBS in their infants regardless of their GBS colonisation status.

Immune response measured in human volunteers vaccinated with autoclaved Leishmania major vaccine mixed with low dose of BCG

The immune responses induced against Leishmania antigens in volunteers who were vaccinated in a double-blind, randomized field efficacy trial of a preparation of autoclaved Leishmania major (ALM) mixed with a low dose of Bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine (BCG) who developed either a cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) lesion due to exposure to infected sandfly bite(s) or did not develop a lesion during the course of the trial were studied and compared with those of non-vaccinated controls. Blood samples were also assayed from different groups including volunteers with history of CL and volunteers with previous positive or negative leishmanin skin test (LST) without a history of CL. The vaccinated volunteers had received a single dose of either ALM mixed with a low dose of BCG or the same dose of BCG alone. The LST and in vitro proliferative response (stimulation index, SI), interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) production and, in a few cases, interleukin (IL)-4 production of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to soluble Leishmania antigens were measured. The results indicated that volunteers who developed CL in the vaccine arm showed a slightly higher SI than cases who received BCG alone. Volunteers with history of CL and volunteers with positive LST demonstrated the strongest proliferation indices and IFN-gamma production. The data suggest that a single dose of ALM + BCG induces a weak Th1 response in vaccinated volunteers that is far lower than that in volunteers with prior subclinical infection or volunteers with history of CL, who are presumed to be immune.

A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial of a killed L. major vaccine plus BCG against zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran

Safety and efficacy of killed (autoclaved) L. major promastigotes, ALM, mixed with BCG against zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis was tested in healthy volunteers (n = 2453) in a randomized double blind trial vs. BCG as control. Side-effects were similar in both groups but tended to be slightly more frequent and prolonged in the ALM + BCG group. Leishmanin skin test conversion (induration > or =5 mm) was significantly greater in the ALM + BCG than in the BCG group (36.2% vs. 7.9% on day-80 and 33% vs. 19%, after 1 year, respectively). Cumulative incidence rates for 2 years, were similar in both groups (18.0% vs. 18.5%). However, LST responders on day 80 (> or =5 mm) had a significantly lower incidence (35%) of CL during the first year than non-responders. A single dose of ALM + BCG is not sufficiently immunogenic to provide a measurable response when compared to BCG alone. A single dose of this vaccine has been shown to be safe with no evidence of an exacerbating response following natural infection; hence, multiple doses or other adjuvants should be considered to increase its immunogenicity.

Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with itraconazole. Randomized double-blind study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of itraconazole with placebo in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major.

DESIGN

Double-blind placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Patients were selected from volunteers wit cutaneous leishmaniasis who lived in a hyperendemic area.

PATIENTS

One hundred forty patients were randomly selected for this double-blind study. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, gestation, age younger than 12 years, and duration of disease of more than 4 months.

INTERVENTION

Each patient received itraconazole (7 mg/kg per day) or placebo for a 3-week period. The patients were kept under observation for an additional 30-day period. OUTCOME. The study was completed as planned in 131 patients.

RESULTS

Complete healing occurred in 59% of the itraconazole group in comparison with 44.3% of the patients who were treated with placebo capsules. No difference was found between the 2 groups with respect to adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Although itraconazole has the advantage of being an oral agent that is used in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis, the low response rate in patients receiving itraconazole indicates that itraconazole cannot be used as the single agent in the treatment of patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. major.