Cost-effectiveness analysis of genetic tools to predict treatment response in patients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies show variable efficacy for patients with CF. Patient-derived predictive tools may identify individuals likely to respond to CFTRs, but are not in routine use. We aimed to determine the cost-utility of predictive tool-guided treatment with CFTRs as add-on to standard of care (SoC) for individuals with CF.

METHODS

This economic evaluation compared two strategies using an individual level simulation: (i) Treat All, where all patients received CFTRs plus SoC and (ii) Test→Treat, where patients who tested positive on predictive tools received CFTRs plus SoC and those who tested negative received SoC only. We simulated 50,000 individuals over their lifetime, and estimated costs (2020 CAD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) from the healthcare payer's perspective, discounted at 1.5% annually. The model was populated using Canadian CF registry data and published literature. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity were conducted.

RESULTS

The Treat All and Test→Treat and strategies yielded 22.41 and 21.36 QALYs, and cost $4.21 M and $3.15 M respectively. Results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that Test→Treat was highly cost-effective compared to Treat All in 100% of simulations at cost-effectiveness thresholds as high as $500,000 per QALY. Test→Treat may save between $931 K to $1.1 M per QALY lost, depending on sensitivity and specificity of predictive tools.

CONCLUSION

The use of predictive tools could optimize the health benefits of CFTR modulators while reducing costs. Our findings support the use of pre-treatment predictive testing and may help inform coverage and reimbursement policies for individuals with CF.

Characterizing the cascade of care for hepatitis C virus infection among Status First Nations peoples in Ontario: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

As First Nations Peoples are a priority focus of Canada's commitment to eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a public health threat, understanding individuals' progression from diagnosis to cure can guide prioritization of elimination efforts. We sought to characterize and identify gaps in the HCV care cascade for Status First Nations peoples in Ontario.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, a partnership between the Ontario First Nations HIV/AIDS Education Circle and academic researchers, HCV testing records (1999-2018) for Status First Nations peoples in Ontario were linked to health administrative data. We defined the cascade of care as 6 stages, as follows: tested positive for HCV antibody, tested for HCV RNA, tested positive for HCV RNA, HCV genotyped, initiated treatment and achieved sustained viral response (SVR). We mapped the care cascade from 1999 to 2018, and estimated the number and proportion of people at each stage. We stratified analyses by sex, diagnosis date and location of residence. We used Cox regression to analyze the secondary outcomes, namely the associations between undergoing HCV RNA testing and initiating treatment, and demographic and clinical predictors.

RESULTS

By Dec. 31, 2018, 4962 people tested positive for HCV antibody. Of those testing positive, 4118 (83.0%) were tested for HCV RNA, with 2480 (60.2%) testing positive. Genotyping was completed in 2374 (95.7%) of those who tested positive for HCV RNA, with 1002 (42.2%) initiating treatment. Nearly 80% (n = 801, 79.9%) of treated people achieved SVR, with 34 (4.2%) experiencing reinfection or relapse. Undergoing testing for HCV RNA was more likely among people in older age categories (within 1 yr of antibody test; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.41, among people aged 41-60 yr; adjusted HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.81, among people aged > 60 yr), those living in rural areas (adjusted HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.30), those with an index date after Dec. 31, 2013 (era of treatment with direct-acting antiviral regimens) (adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.85-2.15) and those with a record of substance use or addictive disorders (> 1 yr after antibody test; adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.60). Treatment initiation was more likely among people in older age categories at index date (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.50, among people aged 41-60 yr; adjusted HR 2.62, 95% CI 1.80-3.82, among people aged > 60 yr) and those with a later diagnosis year (adjusted HR 2.71, 95% CI 2.29-3.22).

INTERPRETATION

In comparison with HCV testing and diagnosis, a substantial gap in treatment initiation remains among Status First Nations populations in Ontario. Elimination efforts that prioritize linkage to care and integration with harm reduction and substance use services are needed to close gaps in HCV care among First Nations populations in Ontario.

Cost-effectiveness of Fibrinogen Concentrate vs Cryoprecipitate for Treating Acquired Hypofibrinogenemia in Bleeding Adult Cardiac Surgical Patients

Importance

Excessive bleeding requiring fibrinogen replacement is a serious complication of cardiac surgery. However, the relative cost-effectiveness of the 2 available therapies-fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate-is unknown.

Objective

To determine cost-effectiveness of fibrinogen concentrate vs cryoprecipitate for managing active bleeding in adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A within-trial economic evaluation of the Fibrinogen Replenishment in Surgery (FIBERS) randomized clinical trial (February 2017 to November 2018) that took place at 4 hospitals based in Ontario, Canada, hospitals examined all in-hospital resource utilization costs and allogeneic blood product (ABP) transfusion costs incurred within 28 days of surgery. Participants included a subset of 495 adult patients from the FIBERS trial who underwent cardiac surgery and developed active bleeding and acquired hypofibrinogenemia requiring fibrinogen replacement.

Interventions

Fibrinogen concentrate (4 g per dose) or cryoprecipitate (10 units per dose) randomized (1:1) up to 24 hours postcardiopulmonary bypass.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Effectiveness outcomes included number of ABPs administered within 24 hours and 7 days of cardiopulmonary bypass. ABP transfusion (7-day) and in-hospital resource utilization (28-day) costs were evaluated and a multivariable net benefit regression model built for the full sample and predefined subgroups.

Results

Patient level costs for 495 patients were evaluated (mean [SD] age 59.2 [15.4] years and 69.3% male.) Consistent with FIBERS, ABP transfusions and adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. Median (IQR) total 7-day ABP cost was CAD $2280 (US dollars [USD] $1697) (CAD $930 [USD $692]-CAD $4970 [USD $3701]) in the fibrinogen concentrate group and CAD $2770 (USD $1690) (IQR, CAD $1140 [USD $849]-CAD $5000 [USD $3723]) in the cryoprecipitate group. Median (interquartile range) total 28-day cost was CAD $38 180 (USD $28 431) $(IQR, CAD $26 350 [USD $19 622]-CAD $65 080 [USD $48 463]) in the fibrinogen concentrate group and CAD $38 790 (USD $28 886) (IQR, CAD $26 180 [USD $19 495]-CAD $70 380 [USD $52 409]) in the cryoprecipitate group. After exclusion of patients who were critically ill before surgery (11%) due to substantial variability in costs, the incremental net benefit of fibrinogen concentrate vs cryoprecipitate was positive (probability of being cost-effective 86% and 97% at $0 and CAD $2000 (USD $1489) willingness-to-pay, respectively). Net benefit was highly uncertain for nonelective and patients with critical illness.

Conclusions and Relevance

Fibrinogen concentrate is cost-effective when compared with cryoprecipitate in most bleeding adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with acquired hypofibrinogenemia requiring fibrinogen replacement. The generalizability of these findings outside the Canadian health system needs to be verified.

A population-based study of the direct longitudinal health care costs of upper extremity trauma in patients aged 18-65 years

BACKGROUND

Upper extremity (UE) trauma represents a common reason for emergency department visits, but the longitudinal economic burden of this public health issue is unknown. This study assessed the 3-year attributable health care use and expenditure after UE trauma requiring acute surgical intervention, with specific focus on injuries that affect function of the hand and wrist.

METHODS

We conducted an incidence-based, propensity score-matched cohort study (2006-2014) in Ontario, Canada, using linked administrative health care data to identify case patients and matched control patients. We matched adults with hand, wrist and UE nerve trauma requiring surgery 1:4 to control patients. We compared total direct health care costs, including 1-year pre-index costs, between case and control patients using a differences-in-difference methodology. The primary outcome was attributable health care costs within 3 years of injury.

RESULTS

We matched patients with trauma (n = 26 123) to noninjured patients (n = 104 353). Mean direct health care costs attributable to UE trauma were $9210 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8880 to 9550) within 3 years. Patients with trauma had significantly more emergency department visits (≥ 3 visits: 25% v. 12%; p < 0.001), mental health visits (34% v. 28%; p < 0.05) and secondary surgeries (25% v. 5%; p < 0.001). Specific patient populations had significantly greater attributable costs: patients requiring post-traumatic mental health visits ($11 360 v. $7090; p < 0.001), inpatient surgery ($14 060 v. $5940, p < 0.001) and complex injuries ($13 790 v. $7930; p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Health care expenditure increased more than fivefold in the year after UE trauma surgery and remained greater than the matched cohort for the subsequent 2 years. Those with more serious injuries and post-injury visits for mental health were associated with higher costs, requiring further study for this public health issue. The mean 1-year pre-injury and 1-year post-injury total costs were $1710 and $9350, respectively.

No Time to Waste: An Appraisal of Value at the End of Life

OBJECTIVES

The use of economic evaluations of end-of-life interventions may be limited by an incomplete appreciation of how patients and society perceive value at end of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate how patients, caregivers, and society value gains in quantity of life and quality of life (QOL) at the end of life. The validity of the assumptions underlying the use of the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) as a measure of preferences at end of life was also examined.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched from inception to February 22, 2021. Original research studies reporting empirical data on healthcare priority setting at end of life were included. There was no restriction on the use of either quantitative or qualitative methods. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data from studies. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all included studies. The primary outcomes were the value of gains in quantity of life and the value of gains in QOL at end of life.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies involving 53 981 participants reported that gains in QOL were generally preferred over quantity of life at the end of life across stakeholder groups. Several violations of the underlying assumptions of the QALY to measure preferences at the end of life were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients, caregivers, and members of the general public prioritize gains in QOL over marginal gains in life prolongation at the end of life. These findings suggest that policy evaluations of end-of-life interventions should favor those that improve QOL. QALYs may be an inadequate measure of preferences for end-of-life care thereby limiting their use in formal economic evaluations of end-of-life interventions.

Abstract P4-10-22: Patient reported symptoms and functional status in breast cancer

Background: To improve symptom management in cancer patients, the province of Ontario (Canada) implemented the collection of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Patient-Reported Functional Status (PRFS) tool at cancer centre outpatient visits. ESAS measures 9 symptoms on a scale from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst possible symptom); scores &gt; 4 (moderate to severe) require intervention. The PRFS tool is a version of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status tool designed to be completed by the patient; scores range from 0 (“normal with no limitation”) to 4 (“pretty much bedridden, rarely out of bed”). Our main objective was to describe the symptom burden and functional status of breast cancer (BC) patients.Methods: This cross-sectional study included women with stage I-IV BC who completed the ESAS and the PRFS tool during outpatient clinic visits at 2 Toronto academic centres. ESAS and PRFS scores were described for 3 participant groups: women diagnosed with early-stage BC (ESBC= stages I-III) in the year prior to enrolment; women with ESBC diagnosed &gt; 1 year prior to enrolment; and women with metastatic BC. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with ESAS scores &gt; 4 for each ESAS symptom. Covariates included age, comorbidity, BC subtype, disease group, previous surgery, and current systemic therapy. Results: Of 381 women, 107 (28%) were diagnosed with ESBC ≤ 1 year prior to enrolment; 171 (45%) were diagnosed with ESBC &gt; 1 year prior to enrolment; 103 (27%) had metastatic BC. Mean age was 57 (SD17) years. For ESBC, tiredness had the highest incidence of moderate to severe scores, followed by impaired well-being and anxiety (Table 1). For metastatic BC, impaired well-being had the highest incidence of moderate to severe symptoms, followed by tiredness and anxiety. More than 20% of metastatic BC patients had scores &gt; 4 for pain, drowsiness, shortness of breath and depression. Most reported PRFS scores of 0 (“Normal with no limitations”) or 1 (“Not my normal self, but able to be up and about with fairly normal activities”), but 17% of metastatic BC patients reported a PRFS of 2 (“Not feeling up to most things, but in bed or chair less than half the day”). A comorbidity score ≥1 was associated with moderate to severe depression (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.1-3.7), lack of appetite (OR 3.1; 95%CI 1.4-6.6), shortness of breath (OR 2.6; 95%CI 1.3-5.2), tiredness (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.2-3.3) and impaired well-being (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.2-3.4). Metastatic BC was associated with moderate to severe scores for anxiety (OR 2.3; 95%CI 1.2-4.5), pain (OR 3.0; 95%CI 1.4-6.4) and impaired well-being (OR 2.1; 95%CI 1.1-4.0). Conclusion: A high prevalence of symptom scores &gt; 4 was found both in ESBC and metastatic BC, highlighting the need of symptom screening for all BC patients. Particular attention should be paid to patients with comorbidity scores ≥ 1, who have increased odds of presenting higher symptom scores.

Table 1.- Prevalence of ESAS scores ≥ 4 and PRFS scores for each disease group.ESAS SymptomsPercent with ESAS scores ≥ 4 (moderate to severe)Early-Stage Breast Cancer – 1st year (N=107)Early-Stage Breast Cancer – &gt; 1st year (N=171)Metastatic Breast Cancer (N=103)Total (N=381)Pain12.1%14.7%30.1%18.2%Tiredness25.2%30.1%39.8%31.3%Drowsiness1.8%12.9%25.2%16.6%Nausea9.4%3.5%7.8%4.2%Lack of Appetite10.3%7.1%13.6%9.5%Shortness of Breath14%7.6%22.3%12.4%Depression17.7%14.6%22.6%16.5%Anxiety24.3%17.2%35.3%21.3%Well-being1.8%25.7%44.1%30.3%PRFS scoresPercent with PRFS ScoreNormal with no limitations (0)30.8%49.7%28.2%38.6%Not my normal self, but able to be up and about with fairly normal activities (1)52.3%42.1%50.5%47.2%Not feeling up to most things, but in bed or chair less than half the day (2)12.2%4.7%16.5%10%Able to do little activity and spend most of the day in bed or chair (3)3.7%2.3%4.9%3.4%Pretty much bedridden, rarely out of bed (4)----

Citation Format: Sofia Torres, Ahmed Bayoumi, Geoffrey Liu, Ana Beatriz Kinupe Abrahao, Nicholas Mitsakakis, Murray Krahn, Maureen Trudeau. Patient reported symptoms and functional status in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-22.

Abstract P4-12-11: Eq-5d-5l utility scores for patients with breast cancer

Background: The EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) is a generic patient-reported outcome measure widely used to capture meaningful change in health-related quality of life between treatments to inform drug and health technology reimbursement decision making. The EQ-5D-5L (5 level) consists of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a visual analogue scale (VAS). Each dimension has 5 levels, ranging from 1 “no problems” to 5 “extreme problems”, generating 3125 distinct health states (HS). The VAS score ranges from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable). We used Canadian Index values to calculate community-weighted utility scores for 5 pre-defined breast cancer (BC) disease states.Methods: This cross-sectional study included adult women diagnosed with stage I to IV BC, who completed EQ-5D-5L, during outpatient clinic visits at two academic cancer centres in Toronto. Participants were classified into 5 disease states, considered relevant both to clinical practice and economic modeling, ranging from primary breast cancer to metastatic disease. EQ-5D-5L scores were described for each disease state, and mean utility scores and VAS scores were calculated.Results: 549 women were included; the mean age was 57 (SD 12) years; 72% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0. A majority reported “Slight” to “Moderate” problems for the “Pain/Discomfort” (60%) and “Anxiety/Depression” (55%) dimensions of EQ-5D-5L; in all other dimensions, most patients reported “No problems”. As expected, patients with metastatic BC had the highest proportion of reported problems. The mean EQ-5D-5L index score was 0.83 (SD 0.13; range 0.36 to 0.95), with a distribution skewed towards full health and a ceiling effect of 20% (n=110; Table 1). Only 126 different self-reported health states were observed in our patient population. Mean VAS was 75 (SD 17.5; range 10 to 100). For early BC, mean index scores were: 0.87 (n=49; SD 0.07) for patients on chemotherapy (+/-targeted therapy); 0.85 (n=212; SD 0.12) for patients on endocrine treatment (+/-targeted therapy); 0.79 (n=16; SD 16) for patients on targeted therapy; and 0.84 (n=129; SD 0.14) for patients not receiving systemic therapy. For metastatic BC, mean index scores were: 0.79 (n=36, SD 14) for patients on chemotherapy (+/-targeted therapy); 0.80 (n=79, SD 0.14) for patients on endocrine treatment (+/-targeted therapy); 0.69 (n=8; SD 0.19) for patients on targeted therapy; and 0.77 (n=20; SD 0.14) for patients not receiving systemic therapy.Conclusions: BC had an impact mainly in the “Pain/Discomfort” and “Anxiety/Depression” dimensions of EQ-5D-5L. A high ceiling effect was observed in this patient population, despite using the 5L version of EQ-5D. EQ-5D-5L health utilities were significantly lower for metastatic BC, but no significant differences were found among various early-stage BC states.

Table 1.- Mean EQ-5D-5L Index and VAS scoresEQ-5D-5LIndex ScoresVASDisease StateN (%)Mean (SD)Min-MaxMean (SD)Min-Max1st year after primary BC146 (27)0.85 (0.12)*0.23-0.9576.5(16.6)10-1001st year after recurrence or primary BC13 (2)0.78 (0.21)0.13-0.9568.9(23.3)20-1002nd-5th year after a primary BC or recurrence treated with curative intent185 (34)0.84 (0.11)*0.21-0.9578.3(14.7)36-1006th and following years after a primary BC or recurrence treated with curative intent62 (11)0.86 (0.14)*0.36-0.9581.0(15.6)20-100Metastatic BC143 (26)0.78 (0.14)0.29-0.9567.3(19.2)21-100Total549 (100)0.83 (0.13)0.13-0.9575.0(17.5)10-100*significant difference was found between these disease states and metastatic diseases (P &lt; 0.05).

Citation Format: Sofia Torres, Ahmed Bayoumi, Maureen Trudeau, Ana Beatriz Kinupe Abrahao, Nicholas Mitsakakis, Murray Krahn, Geoffrey Liu. Eq-5d-5l utility scores for patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-11.

Time Costs and Out-of-Pocket Costs in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C in a Publicly Funded Health System

OBJECTIVES

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection affects more than 70 million people worldwide and imposes considerable health and economic burdens on patients and society. This study estimated 2 understudied components of the economic burden, patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and time costs, in patients with CHC in a tertiary hospital clinic setting and a community clinic setting.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study with hospital-based (n = 174) and community-based (n = 101) cohorts. We used a standardized instrument to collect healthcare resource use, time, and OOP costs. OOP costs included patient-borne costs for medical services, nonprescription drugs, and nonmedical expenses related to healthcare visits. Patient and caregiver time costs were estimated using an hourly wage value derived from patient-reported employment income and, where missing, derived from the Canadian census. Sensitivity analysis explored alternative methods of valuing time. Costs were reported in 2020 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

The mean 3-month OOP cost was $55 (95% confidence interval [CI] $21-$89) and $299 (95% CI $170-$427) for the community and hospital cohorts, respectively. The mean 3-month patient time cost was $743 (95% CI $485-$1002) (community) and $465 (95% CI $248-$682) (hospital). The mean 3-month caregiver time cost was $31 (95% CI $0-$63) (community) and $277 (95% CI $174-$380) (hospital). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis bore the highest costs.

CONCLUSIONS

OOP costs and patient and caregiver time costs represent a considerable economic burden to patient with CHC, equivalent to 14% and 21% of the reported total 3-month income for the hospital-based and community-based cohorts, respectively.

Association of Neighborhood-Level Material Deprivation With Health Care Costs and Outcome After Stroke

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To determine the association between material deprivation and direct health care costs and clinical outcomes following stroke in the context of a publicly funded universal health care system.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study of patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke admitted to the hospital between 2008 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada, we used linked administrative data to identify the cohort, predictor variables, and outcomes. The exposure was a 5-level neighborhood material deprivation index. The primary outcome was direct health care costs incurred by the public payer in the first year. Secondary outcomes were death and admission to long-term care.

RESULTS

Among 90,289 patients with stroke, the mean (SD) per-person costs increased with increasing material deprivation, from $50,602 ($55,582) in the least deprived quintile to $56,292 ($59,721) in the most deprived quintile (unadjusted relative cost ratio and 95% confidence interval 1.11 [1.08, 1.13] and adjusted relative cost ratio 1.07 [1.05, 1.10] for least compared to most deprived quintile). People in the most deprived quintile had higher mortality within 1 year compared to the least deprived quintile (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.07 [1.03, 1.12]) as well as within 3 years (adjusted HR 1.09 [1.05, 1.13]). Admission to long-term care increased incrementally with material deprivation and those in the most deprived quintile had an adjusted HR of 1.33 (1.24, 1.43) compared to those in the least deprived quintile.

DISCUSSION

Material deprivation is a risk factor for increased costs and poor outcomes after stroke. Interventions targeting health inequities due to social determinants of health are needed.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that the neighborhood-level material deprivation predicts direct health care costs.

Economic evaluations and costing studies of lung transplantation: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of the joint clinical and economic impacts of lung transplant and associated technologies is crucial for evidence-informed decision-making and wise allocation of scarce healthcare resources. We performed a scoping review to summarize and categorize the available evidence of the costs and cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHS EED, and EconLit was performed to identify studies involving lung transplantation for adults that measured costs, cost-effectiveness, or which described themselves as economic evaluations. A scoping review was performed in adherence to the framework described by Arksey & O'Malley. Risk of bias was assessed in included studies using the ECOBIAS and CHEC-list tools.

RESULTS

In total, 324 studies were identified, of which 28 met inclusion criteria. Cost-utility estimates of lung transplant versus waitlist, from the healthcare payer perspective and a time-horizon of at least 10-years ranged between $42,459 and $154,051 per quality-adjusted life year. Common topics of study included lung transplant versus waitlist care, immunosuppression, organ retrieval and allocation, and mechanical life support.

CONCLUSIONS

Sources of variation in costs-assessments and economic evaluations included differences in the type of study performed, payer perspective adopted, study time horizon, and variation in clinical practice. The best available cost-utility estimates for lung transplant versus waitlist may represent cost-effectiveness under some circumstances, but high-quality evidence is lacking. Further cost-utility analyses, with sufficient methodologic rigour, are required to overcome the observed variation in results and confirm cost-effectiveness of the current standard of care in lung transplantation.

Towards Transparency in the Selection of Published Health Utility Inputs in Cost-Utility Analyses: The Health Utility Application Tool (HAT)

BACKGROUND

Evaluating the relevance of published health utilities to the context of a cost-utility analysis (CUA) remains an essential, yet often overlooked, task.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide guidance on this process through the development of the Health utility Application Tool (HAT).

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with Canadian stakeholders from reimbursement bodies, academia, and the pharmaceutical industry to identify current practices and perspectives of the application of the health utility literature to CUAs. An online survey with international members of the general health economics and outcomes research community was also conducted to gather opinions on key concepts.

RESULTS

Based on the themes emerging from the interviews and online questionnaire, the HAT includes questions prompting investigators to consider the following constructs: similarity of the clinical condition in the health utility study and the CUA; similarity of health utility study participant demographics and the demographics of the CUA's target population; similarity of the health state descriptions in the health utility study and the CUA; and the method of assigning utility weights. Considerations of transparency prompted additional items, including: means by which the health utility study was identified; type of respondents; study design; and measure used to collect health utility estimates.

CONCLUSION

The HAT is intended to guide the evaluation of the applicability of published health utilities for a CUA, thus promoting transparency and accountability in the selection of model inputs.

Hepatitis C virus infection in First Nations populations in Ontario from 2006 to 2014: a population-based retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality in Canada and is of concern among First Nations communities. In partnership with the Ontario First Nations HIV/AIDS Education Circle, we described trends in HCV testing and epidemiologic features among Status First Nations people in Ontario.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we used health administrative databases for 2006-2014 in Ontario with 3 cohorts of Status First Nations people: those tested for HCV for the first time, those who tested positive for HCV antibodies or RNA, and those with no HCV laboratory or testing records. We examined cohort characteristics, and the annual prevalence and incidence of testing and diagnosis of HCV infection. Outcomes were stratified by region, sex and residence within or outside of First Nations communities.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2423 Status First Nations people were diagnosed with HCV infection, 20 481 received their first test, and 135 185 had no test record. The point prevalence of ever having been tested increased from 6.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2-6.5) per 100 people in 2006 to 16.2 (95% CI 16.0-16.4) per 100 people in 2014. The point prevalence of diagnosed HCV infection increased from 0.9 (95% CI 0.9-1.0) to 2.0 (95% CI 1.9-2.0) per 100 people. The incidence of first test and of diagnosis increased from 12.1 (95% CI 11.5-12.6) to 21.3 (95% CI 20.5-22.1) per 1000 person-years and from 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) to 2.3 (95% CI 2.1-2.6) per 1000 person-years, respectively. Testing, diagnosis and prevalence of HCV infection were consistently higher among people living outside of versus within First Nations communities, but larger increases over time were observed among those living within First Nations communities.

INTERPRETATION

Testing and diagnosis of HCV infection increased from 2006 to 2014 among Status First Nations people in Ontario. Our findings indicate the need for population-level efforts to eliminate hepatitis C in First Nations communities.

Evaluating the conduct and application of health utility studies: a review of critical appraisal tools and reporting checklists

BACKGROUND

Published health utility studies are increasingly cited in cost-utility analyses to inform reimbursement decision-making. However, there is limited guidance for investigators looking to systematically evaluate the methodological quality of health utility studies or their applicability to decision contexts.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how health utility concepts are reflected in tools intended for use with the health economic literature, particularly with respect to the evaluation of methodological quality and context applicability.

METHODS

We reviewed the critical appraisal and reporting tools described in a 2012 report published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), supplemented with a keyword search of MEDLINE and EMBASE, to identify existing tools which include health utility constructs. From these tools, a list of relevant items was compiled and grouped into domain categories based on the methodological or applicability aspect they were directed toward.

RESULTS

Of the 24 tools we identified, 12 contained items relevant to the evaluation of health utilities. Sixty-five items were considered relevant to the evaluation of quality, while 44 were relevant to the evaluation of applicability. Items were arranged into four domains: health state descriptions; selection and description of respondents; elicitation and measurement methods; and other considerations.

CONCLUSION

As key inputs to cost-utility analyses, health utilities have the potential to significantly impact estimates of cost-effectiveness. Existing tools contain only general items related to the conduct or use of health utility studies. There is a need to develop tools that systematically evaluate the methodological quality and applicability of health utility studies.

Health care costs associated with hepatitis C virus infection in First Nations populations in Ontario: a retrospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Colonization and marginalization have affected the risk for and experience of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection for First Nations people in Canada. In partnership with the Ontario First Nations HIV/AIDS Education Circle, we estimated the publicly borne health care costs associated with HCV infection among Status First Nations people in Ontario.

METHODS

In this retrospective matched cohort study, we used linked health administrative databases to identify Status First Nations people in Ontario who tested positive for HCV antibodies or RNA between 2004 and 2014, and Status First Nations people who had no HCV testing records or only a negative test result (control group, matched 2:1 to case participants). We estimated total and net costs (difference between case and control participants) for 4 phases of care: prediagnosis (6 mo before HCV infection diagnosis), initial (after diagnosis), late (liver disease) and terminal (6 mo before death), until death or Dec. 31, 2017, whichever occurred first. We stratified costs by sex and residence within or outside of First Nations communities. All costs were measured in 2018 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, 2197 people were diagnosed with HCV infection. The mean net total costs per 30 days of HCV infection were $348 (95% confidence interval [CI] $277 to $427) for the prediagnosis phase, $377 (95% CI $288 to $470) for the initial phase, $1768 (95% CI $1153 to $2427) for the late phase and $893 (95% CI -$1114 to $3149) for the terminal phase. After diagnosis of HCV infection, net costs varied considerably among those who resided within compared to outside of First Nations communities. Net costs were higher for females than for males except in the terminal phase.

INTERPRETATION

The costs per 30 days of HCV infection among Status First Nations people in Ontario increased substantially with progression to advanced liver disease and finally to death. These estimates will allow for planning and evaluation of provincial and territorial population-specific hepatitis C control efforts.

Sex differences in direct healthcare costs following stroke: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The economic burden of stroke on the healthcare system has been previously described, but sex differences in healthcare costs have not been well characterized. We described the direct person-level healthcare cost in men and women as well as the various health settings in which costs were incurred following stroke.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with stroke between 2008 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada, we used linked administrative data to calculate direct person-level costs in Canadian dollars in the one-year following stroke. We used a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and a log link function to compare costs in women and men with and without adjustment for baseline clinical differences. We also assessed for an interaction between age and sex using restricted cubic splines to model the association of age with costs.

RESULTS

We identified 101,252 patients (49% were women, median age [Q1-Q3] was 76 years [65-84]). Unadjusted costs following stroke were higher in women compared to men (mean ± standard deviation cost was $54,012 ± 54,766 for women versus $52,829 ± 59,955 for men, and median cost was $36,703 [$16,496-$72,227] for women versus $32,903 [$15,485-$66,007] for men). However, after adjustment, women had 3% lower costs compared to men (relative cost ratio and 95% confidence interval 0.97 [0.96,0.98]). The lower cost in women compared to men was most prominent among people aged over 85 years (p for interaction = 0.03). Women incurred lower costs than men in outpatient care and rehabilitation, but higher costs in complex continuing care, long-term care, and home care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of resource utilization and direct medical costs were different between men and women after stroke. Our findings inform public payers of the drivers of costs following stroke and suggest the need for sex-based cost-effectiveness evaluation of stroke interventions with consideration of costs in all care settings.

Implementation, spread and impact of the Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) across Ontario hospitals: a mixed methods evaluation

Background

Traditional discharge processes lack a patient-centred focus. This project studied the implementation and effectiveness of an individualized discharge tool across Ontario hospitals. The Patient Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS) is an individualized discharge tool with guidelines that was co-designed with patients and families to enable a patient-centred process.

Methods

Twenty one acute-care and rehabilitation hospitals in Ontario, Canada engaged in a community of practice and worked over a period of 18 months to implement PODS. An effectiveness-implementation hybrid design using a triangulation approach was used with hospital-collected data, patient and provider surveys, and interviews of project teams. Key outcomes included: penetration and fidelity of the intervention, change in patient-centred processes, patient and provider satisfaction and experience, and healthcare utilization. Statistical methods included linear mixed effects models and generalized estimating equations.

Results

Of 65,221 discharges across hospitals, 41,884 patients (64%) received a PODS. There was variation in reach and implementation pattern between sites, though none of the between site covariates was significantly associated with implementation success. Both high participation in the community of practice and high fidelity were associated with higher penetration. PODS improved family involvement during discharge teaching (7% increase, p = 0.026), use of teach-back (11% increase, p < 0.001) and discussion of help needed (6% increase, p = 0.041). Although unscheduled healthcare utilization decreased with PODS implementation, it was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

This project highlighted the system-wide adaptability and ease of implementing PODS across multiple patient groups and hospital settings. PODS demonstrated an improvement in patient-centred discharge processes linked to quality standards and health outcomes. A community of practice and high quality content may be needed for successful implementation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06374-8.

High-Cost Patients and Preventable Spending: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Although high-cost (HC) patients make up a small proportion of patients, they account for most health system costs. However, little is known about HC patients with cancer or whether some of their care could potentially be prevented. This analysis sought to characterize HC patients with cancer and quantify the costs of preventable acute care (emergency department visits and inpatient hospitalizations).

METHODS

This analysis examined a population-based sample of all HC patients in Ontario in 2013. HC patients were defined as those above the 90th percentile of the cost distribution; all other patients were defined as non-high-cost (NHC). Patients with cancer were identified through the Ontario Cancer Registry. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were examined and the costs of preventable acute care for both groups by category of visit/condition were estimated using validated algorithms.

RESULTS

Compared with NHC patients with cancer (n=369,422), HC patients with cancer (n=187,770) were older (mean age 70 vs 65 years), more likely to live in low-income neighborhoods (19% vs 16%), sicker, and more likely to live in long-term care homes (8% vs 0%). Although most patients from both cohorts tended to be diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, those with multiple myeloma or pancreatic or liver cancers were overrepresented among the HC group. Moreover, HC patients were more likely to have advanced cancer at diagnosis and be in the initial or terminal phase of treatment compared with NHC patients. Among HC patients with cancer, 9% of spending stemmed from potentially preventable/avoidable acute care, whereas for NHC patients, this spending was approximately 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

HC patients with cancer are a unique subpopulation. Given the type of care they receive, there seems to be limited scope to prevent acute care spending among this patient group. To reduce costs, other strategies, such as making hospital care more efficient and generating less costly encounters involving chemotherapy, should be explored.

Estimating chronic hepatitis C prevalence in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, using population-based cohort studies

Patients identified as having chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection can be effectively and rapidly treated using direct-acting antiviral agents. However, there remains a substantial burden of subclinical undetected infection. This study estimates the prevalence and undiagnosed proportion of CHC in British Columbia (BC) and Ontario, Canada, using a model-based approach, informed by provincial population-level health administrative data. A two-step approach was used: Step 1) Two population-based retrospective analyses of administrative health data for a cohort of British Columbians and a cohort of Ontarians with CHC were conducted to generate population-level statistics of CHC-related health events; Step 2) using a validated natural history model of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the historical prevalence of CHC was back-calculated from the data collected in Step 1. Our retrospective study found that, in BC and Ontario, the number of newly diagnosed CHC cases is declining yearly while the complications of the disease are increasing yearly. BC had a 2014 CHC prevalence of 1.04% (95% CI: 0.84%-1.44%), with 33.3% (95% CI: 25.5%-42.0%) of CHC cases undiagnosed. Ontario had a 2014 CHC prevalence of 0.91% (95% CI: 0.83%-1.02%) with 36.0% (95% CI: 31.2%-38.9%) of CHC cases undiagnosed. Our study offers robust estimates based on the integration of a validated natural history model with population-level health administrative data on HCV-related events, which can provide vital evidence for policymakers to develop appropriate policies to achieve elimination targets. Our approach can also be applied to produce robust region-specific estimates in other countries.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Exercise Maintenance Intervention in Men and Women After Cardiac Rehabilitation (ECO-PCR Trial)

BACKGROUND

Exercise maintenance interventions are needed for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) graduates to maintain moderate and vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA). We tested an exercise facilitator intervention (EFI) to promote exercise maintenance compared with usual care (UC) separately in men and women.

METHODS

This was a 3-site, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, superiority trial (ECO-PCR). CR graduates were stratified by site and sex and randomly allocated (concealed). EFI participants received a face-to-face introductory session, 5 small-group counseling teleconferences, and 3 personal calls from a trained facilitator over 50 weeks. In-person assessments were undertaken at baseline and 26 and 52 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was weekly minutes of MVPA, measured by accelerometer. Secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, risk factors, quality of life, and enrollment in community-based exercise programs. Effects were tested with the use of linear mixed models.

RESULTS

A total of 449 CR graduates (135 women, 314 men) were randomised (n = 226 EFI, n = 223 UC). In the intention-to-treat analysis for men and for women, there were no significant effects for treatment or time on MVPA. In a planned secondary analysis that considered only those adherent to EFI (completed ≥ 66% of sessions; per-protocol), bouted MVPA (ie, in sustained bouts of ≥ 10 min) was higher in women in the EFI group (mean = 132.6 ± 135.2 min/wk at 52 weeks) compared with UC (111.8 ± 113.1; P = 0.013). Regarding secondary outcomes, in women, a treatment group main effect was observed for blood pressure (P = 0.011) and exercise capacity (P = 0.019; both per-protocol) favouring EFI; no other differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial of CR completers, an EFI showed promise for women, but was ineffective in men.

Direct and indirect utilities of patients with mild to moderate versus severe carpal tunnel syndrome

Health utility is a quantitative global measure of patients' health status. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare health utilities of patients with mild to moderate versus severe carpal tunnel syndrome and determine inter-instrumental agreement. Health utilities of 29 patients with varying severity of carpal tunnel syndrome were measured indirectly by Short-Form Sixth Dimension and EuroQol 5D questionnaire and directly by Chained Standard Gamble and a visual analogue scale. Health utility was 0.69 for Short-Form Sixth Dimension, 0.78 for EuroQol 5D Questionnaire, 0.98 for Chained Standard Gamble, and 0.76 for the visual analogue scale. There was a significant inter-instrumental agreement between three of the instruments, but not the Chained Standard Gamble. The difference in health utilities between patients with mild or moderate versus severe carpal tunnel syndrome was significant only for the EuroQol 5D questionnaire. We conclude based on our results that there are no clear indications on how health utilities can be integrated into decision analysis models and economic evaluation regarding carpal tunnel syndrome of various severities.Level of evidence: IV.

Understanding resource utilization and mortality in COPD to support policy making: A microsimulation study

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a significant but heterogeneous burden to individuals and healthcare systems. Policymakers develop targeted policies to minimize this burden but need personalized tools to evaluate novel interventions and target them to subpopulations most likely to benefit. We developed a platform to identify subgroups that are at increased risk of emergency department visits, hospitalizations and mortality and to provide stratified patient input in economic evaluations of COPD interventions. We relied on administrative and survey data from Ontario, Canada and applied a combination of microsimulation and multi-state modeling methods. We illustrated the functionality of the platform by quantifying outcomes across smoking status (current, former, never smokers) and by estimating the effect of smoking cessation on resource use and survival, by comparing outcomes of hypothetical cohorts of smokers who quit at diagnosis and smokers that continued to smoke post diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 37.9% (95% CI: 34.9, 41.4) for never smokers, 34.7% (95% CI: 32.1, 36.9) for current smokers, and 46.4% (95% CI: 43.6, 49.0) for former smokers, at 14 years. Over 14 years, smokers who did not quit at diagnosis had 16.3% (95% CI: 9.6, 38.4%) more COPD-related emergency department visits than smokers who quit at diagnosis. In summary, we combined methods from clinical and economic modeling to create a novel tool that policymakers and health economists can use to inform future COPD policy decisions and quantify the effect of modifying COPD risk factors on resource utilization and morality.

Novel CAPN3 variant associated with an autosomal dominant calpainopathy

AIMS

The most common autosomal recessive limb girdle muscular dystrophy is associated with the CAPN3 gene. The exclusively recessive inheritance of this disorder has been recently challenged by the description of the recurrent variants, c.643_663del21 [p.(Ser215_Gly221del)] and c.598_612del15 [p.(Phe200_Leu204del)], associated with autosomal dominant inheritance. Our objective was to confirm the existence of autosomal dominant calpainopathies.

METHODS

Through our activity as one of the reference centres for genetic diagnosis of calpainopathies in France and the resulting collaborations through the French National Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases (FILNEMUS), we identified four families harbouring the same CAPN3 heterozygous variant with supposedly autosomal dominant inheritance.

RESULTS

We identified a novel dominantly inherited CAPN3 variant, c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)] in 14 affected patients from four unrelated families. The complementary phenotypic, functional and genetic findings correlate with an autosomal dominant inheritance in these families, emphasizing the existence of this novel transmission mode for calpainopathies. The mild phenotype associated with these autosomal dominant cases widens the phenotypic spectrum of calpainopathies and should therefore be considered in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm the existence of autosomal dominant calpainopathies as an entity beyond the cases related to the in-frame deletions c.643_663del21 and c.598_612del15, with the identification of a novel dominantly inherited and well-documented CAPN3 missense variant, c.1333G>A [p.(Gly445Arg)]. In addition to the consequences for genetic counselling, the confirmation of an autosomal dominant transmission mode for calpainopathies underlines the importance of re-assessing other myopathies for which the inheritance is considered as strictly autosomal recessive.

Strategies to achieve population control of HCV infection: results of a multidisciplinary focus group

BACKGROUND

To meet the World Health Organization's ambitious target to eradicate hepatitis C virus (HCV) by 2030, a comprehensive strategy is needed in Canada to ensure everyone infected with HCV is identified, diagnosed, and treated. The purpose of this study was to highlight the barriers to any strategy aimed at achieving this goal.

METHODS

A focus group was formed (N = 11) that consisted of clinicians, patients, drug program budget managers, industry representatives, and individuals from provincial public health and federal agencies in Canada. The group met in person for a half-day focus group session. Two discussions were held: one on future barriers related to HCV treatment and one related to HCV screening. A grounded theory approach was used to elicit key themes from the day's discussion.

RESULTS

Nine themes were identified. Four themes related to HCV screening: public awareness and engagement, resource infrastructure and capacity, heterogeneity between provinces, and mechanisms of screening. Three themes related to HCV treatment: access to treatment and illicit drug use, linkage to care, and predicting post-treatment outcomes. Two overarching themes that contributed to most discussions were a focus on baby boomers versus persons who inject drugs and the need for further education and training.

CONCLUSION

The views and findings extracted from this qualitative research complement proposals of national strategies from organizations such as the Canadian Network on Hepatitis C. This work highlights the financial, logistical, and ethical constraints that need to be tackled to make HCV elimination proposals a reality.

The emergency department as a setting-specific opportunity for population-based hepatitis C screening: An economic evaluation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The World Health Organization's hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination strategy recognizes the need for interventions that identify populations most affected by infection. The emergency department (ED) has been suggested as a setting for HCV screening. The study objective was to explore the health and economic impact of HCV screening in the ED setting.

METHODS

We used a microsimulation model to conduct a cost-utility analysis evaluating two ED setting-specific strategies: no screening, and screening and subsequent treatment. Strategies were examined for two populations: (a) the general ED patient population; and (b) ED patients born between 1945 and 1975. The analysis was conducted from a healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime time horizon. A reference and high ED HCV seroprevalence measure were examined in the Canadian healthcare setting.US costs of chronic infection were used for a scenario analysis of screening in the US healthcare setting.

RESULTS

For birth cohort screening, in comparison to no screening, one liver-related death was averted for every 760 and 123 persons screened for the reference and high seroprevalence measures. For general population screening, one liver-related death was averted for every 831 and 147 persons screened for the reference and high seroprevalence measures. In comparison to no screening, birth cohort screening was cost-effective at CAN$25,584/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and US$42,615/QALY. General population screening was cost-effective at CAN$19,733/QALY and US$32,187/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

ED screening may represent a cost-effective component of population-based strategies to eliminate HCV. Further studies are warranted to explore the feasibility and acceptability of this approach.

Chlorhexidine-Related Mortality Rate in Critically Ill Subjects in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to explore the chlorhexidine-related mortality rate for subjects on mechanical ventilation and in an ICU when compared with subjects who received standard ICU care.

METHODS

We searched a number of medical literature databases and the first 100 results in an internet search. Two of us independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the identified articles. Then general and specific characteristics from eligible articles were extracted and the quality of included trials were appraised by using a risk of bias assessment tool. Risk ratios were calculated, together with the 95% CI. Random-effects models with the Mantel-Haenszel method were used to estimate pooled probabilities. Heterogeneity was identified and quantified via the chi square test and I² values, respectively.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 547 studies were suitable for this meta-analysis. The included participants were critically ill adults in ICU settings of high-income countries (n = 1157) and low/ middle-income countries (n = 612). They were assigned to either the chlorhexidine or control groups. Overall, moderate-quality evidence indicated reduced ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence (for high-income countries: RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.87; P = .008; I² = 39%; and for low- and middle-income countries: RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99; P = .05; I² = 10%), without a substantial effect on mortality rate (for high-income countries: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.57; P = .96; I² = 42%; and for low- and middle-income countries: RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.96-1.29; P = .17; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic administration of chlorhexidine among patients who were critically ill and in an ICU setting reduced the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia with no significant impact on associated mortality.

Exploring the Benefits of Transformations in Health Utility Mapping

Background. Quality-of-life research and cost-effectiveness analyses frequently require data on health utility, a global measure of health-related quality of life. When utilities are unavailable, researchers have "mapped" descriptive instruments to utility instruments, using samples of responses to both instruments. Health utilities have an idiosyncratic distribution, with upper bound and probability mass at 1, left skewness, and kurtosis. Estimation of mean utility values conditional on covariates is of interest, particularly in health utility mapping applications. Traditional linear regression may be unsuitable because fundamental assumptions are violated. Complex statistical methods come with deficiencies that may outweigh their benefits. Aim. To investigate the benefits of transforming the health utility response variable before fitting a linear regression model. Methods. We compared log, logit, arcsin, and Box-Cox transformations with an untransformed model, using several measures of model accuracy. We made our evaluation by designing and conducting a simulation study and reanalyzing data from 2 published studies, which "mapped" a psychometric descriptive instrument to a utility instrument. Results. In the simulation study, log transformation with smearing estimator had in most cases the lowest bias but one of the highest variances, especially for estimating low utility values under small sample size. The untransformed model was outperformed by the transformed models. Findings were inconclusive for the analysis of real data, where arcsin gave the lowest error for one of the data sets, while the untransformed model had the best performance for the other. Conclusions. We identified the benefits of transformations and offered suggestions for future modeling of health utilities. However, the benefits were moderate and no single transformation appeared to be universally optimal, suggesting that selection requires examination on a case-by-case basis.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Health Utilities in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is among the most burdensome infectious diseases in the world. Health utilities are a valuable tool for quantifying this burden and conducting cost-utility analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Our study summarizes the available data on utilities in CHC patients. This will facilitate analyses of CHC treatment and elimination strategies.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies measuring utilities in CHC patients. Utilities were pooled by health state and utility instrument using meta-analysis. A further analysis used meta-regression to adjust for the effects of clinical status and methodological variation.

RESULTS

Fifty-one clinical studies comprising 15 053 patients were included. Based on the meta-regression, patients' utilities were lower for more severe health states (predicted mean EuroQol-5D-3L utility for mild/moderate CHC: 0.751; compensated cirrhosis: 0.671; hepatocellular carcinoma: 0.662; decompensated cirrhosis: 0.602). Patients receiving interferon-based treatment had lower utilities than those on interferon-free treatment (0.647 vs 0.733). Patients who achieved sustained virologic response (0.786) had higher utilities than those with mild to moderate CHC. Utilities were substantially higher for patients in experimental studies compared to observational studies (coefficient: +0.074, P < .05). The time tradeoff instrument was associated with the highest utilities, and the Health Utilities Index 3 was associated with the lowest utilities.

CONCLUSION

Chronic hepatitis C is associated with a significant impairment in global health status, as measured by health utility instruments. Impairment is greater in advanced disease. Experimental study designs yield higher utilities-an effect not previously documented. Curative therapy can alleviate the burden of CHC, although further research is needed in certain areas, such as the long-term impacts of treatment on utilities.

Identification of novel pathogenic copy number variations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a hereditary sensory-motor neuropathy characterized by a strong clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Over the past few years, with the occurrence of whole-exome sequencing (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the molecular diagnosis rate has been improved by allowing the screening of more than 80 genes at one time. In CMT, except the recurrent PMP22 duplication accounting for about 60% of pathogenic variations, pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) are rarely reported and only a few studies screening specifically CNVs have been performed. The aim of the present study was to screen for CNVs in the most prevalent genes associated with CMT in a cohort of 200 patients negative for the PMP22 duplication. CNVs were screened using the Exome Depth software on next generation sequencing (NGS) data obtained by targeted capture and sequencing of a panel of 81 CMT associated genes. Deleterious CNVs were identified in four patients (2%), in four genes: GDAP1, LRSAM1, GAN, and FGD4. All CNVs were confirmed by high-resolution oligonucleotide array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) and/or quantitative PCR. By identifying four new CNVs in four different genes, we demonstrate that, although they are rare mutational events in CMT, CNVs might contribute significantly to mutational spectrum of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and should be searched in routine NGS diagnosis. This strategy increases the molecular diagnosis rate of patients with neuropathy.

A model-based framework for chronic hepatitis C prevalence estimation

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) continues to be a highly burdensome disease worldwide. The often-asymptomatic nature of early-stage CHC means that the disease often remains undiagnosed, leaving its prevalence highly uncertain. This generates significant uncertainty in the planning of hepatitis C eradication programs to meet WHO targets. The aim of this work is to establish a mathematical framework for the estimation of a geographic locale’s CHC prevalence and the proportion of its CHC population that remains undiagnosed. A Bayesian MCMC approach is taken to infer these populations from the observed occurrence of CHC-related events using a recently published natural history model of the disease. Using the Canadian context as a specific example, this study estimates that in 2013, the CHC prevalence rate in Canada was 0.63% (95% CI: 0.53% - 0.72%), with 27.1% (95% CI: 19.3% - 36.1%) of the infected population undiagnosed.

New Insights into the Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer in Ontario

The epidemiology of prostate cancer (PC) continues to change. We evaluated the changes in incidence, in average age at diagnosis, and in survival from 1992 to 2015 in Ontario. We compared the cumulative incidence of PC-specific and non PC-specific mortality using two algorithms for cause of death: Method 1 assigned deaths from "other cancers" to non PC-specific causes, and Method 2 assigned these cases to PC-specific mortality. There were 188,714 cases diagnosed with PC between 1992 and 2015 in Ontario. The average age at diagnosis declined from 1992 to 2008 by 0.26 year (3.1 months) annually (p < 0.001) and increased by 0.15 year (1.8 months) thereafter (p > 0.05). Between 2010 and 2015, the proportion of patients diagnosed at stage IV increased, and the proportion diagnosed at stage I decreased (p-values for trends <0.001). Overall survival significantly improved over the years. The cumulative incidence of PC-specific mortality at 5 and 10 years was 6.8 and 9.8% using Method 1, and 10.2 and 16.8% using Method 2. We observed trends toward older age and more advanced stage at PC diagnosis in Ontario. Further studies are needed to validate algorithms for estimating PC-specific mortality from administrative databases.

Health Utility Book (HUB)-Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer

Background. Treatment options in oncology are rapidly advancing, and public payer systems are increasingly under pressure to adopt new but expensive cancer treatments. Cost-utility analyses (CUAs) are used to estimate the relative costs and effects of competing interventions, where health outcomes are measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Health state utility values (HSUVs) are used to reflect health-related quality of life or health status in the calculation of QALYs. To support reimbursement agencies in the appraisal of oncology drug submissions, which typically include a CUA component, we have proposed a systematic literature review of published HSUV estimates in the field of oncology. Methods. The following databases will be searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and CINAHL. A team of reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, will evaluate abstracts and full-text publications for eligibility against broad inclusion criteria. Studies using a direct, indirect, or combination approach to eliciting preferences related to cancer or cancer treatments are eligible. Data extraction will capture details of study methodology, participants, health states, and corresponding HSUVs. We will summarize our findings with descriptive analyses at this stage. A pilot review in thyroid cancer is presented to illustrate the proposed methods. Discussion. This systematic review will generate a comprehensive summary of the oncology HSUV literature. As a component of the Health Utility Book (HUB) project, we anticipate that this work will assist both health economic modelers as well as critical reviewers in the development and appraisal of CUAs in oncology.

SIESTA - Home sleep study with BresoDx for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate (1) the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) informed by the home sleep study with a Type 4 portable monitor BresoDx® versus Type 1 polysomnography (PSG); and (2) agreement of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) compared between BresoDx and PSG.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel, multicentre, single-blind, pragmatic controlled trial enrolling adults referred to three Ontario sleep clinics for suspected OSA. Participants were randomized to BresoDx followed by PSG (one-night apart) or PSG followed by BresoDx sleep testing sequence arms. The primary outcomes included the accuracy of clinical diagnosis and OSA severity measured by AHI between tests.

RESULTS

In sum, 233 participants completed both sleep studies and 206 completed physician consultation visits. The agreement between clinical diagnosis informed by PSG versus BresoDx was fair (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.28). The sensitivity of BresoDx-informed clinical diagnosis against PSG was between 0.86 and 0.89, and the specificity between 0.38 and 0.44. For AHI cut-off of ≥5 events/hour the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 0.85, 0.48, 0.81 and 0.54.

CONCLUSIONS

Home sleep apnea testing with BresoDx can be used in a referral population with a high pretest probability of OSA similar to other Type IV devices. This study complements the existing body of evidence suggesting that home testing with portable devices plays a valuable role for diagnosing of OSA in a variety of settings. SIESTA TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02003729).

Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the published academic literature on the cost of chronic ulcers.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, Econlit and CINAHL up to 12 May 2016 to identify potential studies for review. Cost search terms were based on validated algorithms. Clinical search terms were based on recent Cochrane reviews of interventions for chronic ulcers. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers to determine eligibility for full text review. Study characteristics were summarised. The quality of reporting was evaluated using a modified cost-of-illness checklist. Mean costs were adjusted and inflated to 2015 $US and presented for different durations and perspectives.

RESULTS

Of 2267 studies identified, 36 were eligible and included in the systematic review. Most studies presented results from the health-care public payer or hospital perspective. Many studies included hospital costs in the analysis and only reported total costs without presenting condition-specific attributable costs. The mean cost of chronic ulcers ranged from $1000 per year for patient out of pocket costs to $30,000 per episode from the health-care public payer perspective. Mean one year cost from a health-care public payer perspective was $44,200 for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), $15,400 for pressure ulcer (PU) and $11,000 for leg ulcer (LU).

CONCLUSIONS

There was large variability in study methods, perspectives, cost components and jurisdictions, making interpretation of costs difficult. Nevertheless, it appears that the cost for the treatment of chronic ulcers is substantial and greater attention needs to be made for preventive measures.

Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of a Comprehensive geriatric assessment and management for Canadian elders with Cancer-the 5C study: a study protocol for a randomised controlled phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric assessment and management is recommended for older adults with cancer referred for chemotherapy but no randomised controlled trial has been completed of this intervention in the oncology setting.

TRIAL DESIGN

A two-group parallel single blind multi-centre randomised trial with a companion trial-based economic evaluation from both payer and societal perspectives with process evaluation.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 350 participants aged 70+, diagnosed with a solid tumour, lymphoma or myeloma, referred for first/second line chemotherapy, who speak English/French, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-2 will be recruited. All participants will be followed for 12 months.

INTERVENTION

Geriatric assessment and management for 6 months. The control group will receive usual oncologic care. All participants will receive a monthly healthy ageing booklet for 6 months.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical and cost-effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in optimising outcomes compared with usual oncology care.

RANDOMISATION

Participants will be allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 ratio. The randomisation will be stratified by centre and treatment intent (palliative vs other).

OUTCOME

Quality of life.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

(1) Cost-effectiveness, (2) functional status, (3) number of geriatric issues successfully addressed, (4) grades3-5 treatment toxicity, (5) healthcare use, (6) satisfaction, (7) cancer treatment plan modification and (8) overall survival.

PLANNED ANALYSIS

For the primary outcome we will use a pattern mixture model using an intent-to-treat approach (at 3, 6 and12 months). We will conduct a cost-utility analysis alongside this clinical trial. For secondary outcomes 2-4, we will use a variety of methods.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Our study has been approved by all required REBs. We will disseminate our findings to stakeholders locally, nationally and internationally and by publishing the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03154671.

Toward a Centralized, Systematic Approach to the Identification, Appraisal, and Use of Health State Utility Values for Reimbursement Decision Making: Introducing the Health Utility Book (HUB)

Cost-utility analysis (CUA) is a widely recommended form of health economic evaluation worldwide. The outcome measure in CUA is quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), which are calculated using health state utility values (HSUVs) and corresponding life-years. Therefore, HSUVs play a significant role in determining cost-effectiveness. Formal adoption and endorsement of CUAs by reimbursement authorities motivates methodological advancement in HSUV measurement and application. A large body of evidence exploring various methods in measuring HSUVs has accumulated, imposing challenges for investigators in identifying and applying HSUVs to CUAs. First, large variations in HSUVs between studies are often reported, and these may lead to different cost-effectiveness conclusions. Second, issues concerning the quality of studies that generate HSUVs are increasingly highlighted in the literature. This issue is compounded by the limited published guidance and methodological standards for assessing the quality of these studies. Third, reimbursement decision making is a context-specific process. Therefore, while an HSUV study may be of high quality, it is not necessarily appropriate for use in all reimbursement jurisdictions. To address these issues, by promoting a systematic approach to study identification, critical appraisal, and appropriate use, we are developing the Health Utility Book (HUB). The HUB consists of an HSUV registry, a quality assessment tool for health utility studies, and a checklist for interpreting their use in CUAs. We anticipate that the HUB will make a timely and important contribution to the rigorous conduct and proper use of health utility studies for reimbursement decision making. In this way, health care resource allocation informed by HSUVs may reflect the preferences of the public, improve health outcomes of patients, and maintain the efficiency of health care systems.

Comparative effectiveness of the different components of care provided in heart failure clinics-protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a complex chronic condition, leading to frequent hospitalization, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Current guidelines recommend that multidisciplinary care be provided in specialized HF clinics. A number of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of these clinics; however, there is a wide range in the services provided across different clinics. This network meta-analysis will aim to identify the aspects of HF clinic care that are associated with the best outcomes: a reduction in mortality, hospitalization, and visits to emergency department (ED) and improvements to quality of life.

METHODS

Relevant electronic databases will be systematically searched to identify eligible studies. Controlled trials and observational cohort studies of adult (≥ 18 years of age) patients will be eligible for inclusion if they evaluate at least one component of guideline-based HF clinic care and report all-cause or HF-related mortality, hospitalizations, or ED visits or health-related quality of life assessed after a minimum follow-up of 30 days. Both controlled trials and observational studies will be included to allow us to compare the efficacy of the interventions in an ideal context versus their effectiveness in the real world. Two reviewers will independently perform both title and abstract full-text screenings and data abstraction. Study quality will be assessed through a modified Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or the ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. The strength of evidence will be assessed using a modified Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Network meta-analysis methods will be applied to synthesize the evidence across included studies. To contrast findings between study designs, data from RCTs will be analyzed separately from non-randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. We will estimate both the probability that a particular component of care is the most effective and treatment effects for specified combinations of care.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this will be the first study to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the different components of care offered in HF clinics. The findings from this systematic review will provide valuable insight about which components of HF clinic care are associated with improved outcomes, potentially informing clinical guidelines as well as the design of future care interventions in dedicated HF clinics.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017058003.

Estimating the clinical cost of drug development for orphan versus non-orphan drugs

Background

High orphan drug prices have gained the attention of payers and policy makers. These prices may reflect the need to recoup the cost of drug development from a small patient pool. However, estimates of the cost of orphan drug development are sparse.

Methods

Using publicly available data, we estimated the differences in trial characteristics and clinical development costs with 100 orphan and 100 non-orphan drugs.

Results

We found that the out-of-pocket clinical costs per approved orphan drug to be $166 million and $291 million (2013 USD) per non-orphan drug. The capitalized clinical costs per approved orphan drug and non-orphan drug were estimated to be $291 million and $412 million respectively. When focusing on new molecular entities only, we found that the capitalized clinical cost per approved orphan drug was half that of a non-orphan drug.

Conclusions

More discussion is needed to better align on which cost components should be included in research and development costs for pharmaceuticals.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13023-018-0990-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A phase II randomized controlled trial of three exercise delivery methods in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND

Existing evidence demonstrates that 1:1 personal training (PT) improves many adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether less resource-intensive exercise delivery models are as effective remains to be established. We determined the feasibility of conducting a multi-center non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing PT with supervised group (GROUP) and home-based (HOME) exercise programs, and obtained preliminary efficacy estimates for GROUP and HOME compared to PT on quality of life (QOL) and physical fitness.

METHODS

Men with prostate cancer on ADT were recruited from one of two experienced Canadian centres and randomized 1:1:1 to PT, GROUP, or HOME. Randomization was stratified by length of ADT use and site. Participants completed moderate intensity aerobic and resistance exercises 4-5 days per week for 6 months with a target 150 min per week of exercise. Exercise prescriptions were individualized and progressed throughout the trial. Feasibility endpoints included recruitment, retention, adherence, and participant satisfaction. The efficacy endpoints QOL, fatigue, and fitness (VO2 peak, grip strength, and timed chair stands) in GROUP and HOME were compared for non-inferiority to PT. Descriptive analyses were used for feasibility endpoints. Between-group differences for efficacy endpoints were examined using Bayesian linear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine participants (mean age 69.9 years) were enrolled. The recruitment rate was 25.4% and recruitment was slower than projected. Retention was 71.2%. Exercise adherence as measured through attendance was high for supervised sessions but under 50% by self-report and accelerometry. Satisfaction was high and there was no difference in this measure between all three groups. Between-group differences (comparing both GROUP and HOME to PT) were smaller than the minimum clinically important difference on most measures of QOL, fatigue, and fitness. However, two of six outcomes for GROUP and four of six outcomes for HOME had a > 20% probability of being inferior for GROUP.

CONCLUSIONS

Feasibility endpoints were generally met. Both GROUP and HOME interventions in men with PC on ADT appeared to be similar to PT for multiple efficacy outcomes, although conclusions are limited by a small sample size and cost considerations have not been incorporated. Efforts need to be targeted to improving recruitment and adherence. A larger trial is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02046837 . Date of registration: January 20, 2014.

Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the core components of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), nutritional counseling (NC), risk factor modification (RFM), psychosocial management (PM), patient education (PE), and exercise training (ET)) was undertaken. Published RCTs were identified from database inception dates to April 2017, and risk of bias assessed using Cochrane's tool. Endpoints included mortality (all-cause and cardiovascular (CV)) and morbidity (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and hospitalization (all-cause and CV)). Meta-regression models decomposed treatment effects into the main effects of core components, and two-way or all-way interactions between them. Ultimately, 148 RCTs (50,965 participants) were included. Main effects models were best fitting for mortality (e.g., for all-cause, specifically PM (hazard ratio HR = 0.68, 95% credible interval CrI = 0.54⁻0.85) and ET (HR = 0.75, 95% CrI = 0.60⁻0.92) components effective), MI (e.g., for all-cause, specifically PM (hazard ratio HR = 0.76, 95% credible interval CrI = 0.57⁻0.99), ET (HR = 0.75, 95% CrI = 0.56⁻0.99) and PE (HR = 0.68, 95% CrI = 0.47⁻0.99) components effective) and hospitalization (e.g., all-cause, PM (HR = 0.76, 95% CrI = 0.58⁻0.96) effective). For revascularization (including CABG and PCI individually), the full interaction model was best-fitting. Given that each component, individual or in combination, was associated with mortality and/or morbidity, recommendations for comprehensive CR are warranted.

Protocol for a phase III RCT and economic analysis of two exercise delivery methods in men with PC on ADT

BACKGROUND

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used to treat prostate cancer. However, side effects of ADT often lead to reduced quality of life and physical function. Existing evidence demonstrates that exercise can ameliorate multiple treatment-related side effects for men on ADT, yet adherence rates are often low. The method of exercise delivery (e.g., supervised group in-centre vs. individual home-based) may be important from clinical and economic perspectives; however, few studies have compared different delivery models. Additionally, long-term exercise adherence and an understanding of predictors of adherence are critical to achieving sustained benefits, but such data are lacking. The primary aim of this multi-centre phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial is to determine whether a home-based delivery model is non-inferior to a group-based delivery model in terms of benefits in fatigue and fitness in this population. Two other key aims include examining cost-effectiveness and long-term adherence.

METHODS

Men diagnosed with prostate cancer of any stage, starting or continuing on ADT for at least 6 months, fluent in English, and living close to a study centre are eligible. Participants complete five assessments over 12 months (baseline and every 3 months during the 6-month intervention and 6-month follow-up phases), including a fitness assessment and self-report questionnaires. Biological outcomes are collected at baseline, 6, and 12 months. A total of 200 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to supervised group training or home-based training supported by smartphones, health coaches, and Fitbit technology. Participants are asked to complete 4 to 5 exercise sessions per week, incorporating aerobic, resistance and flexibility training. Outcomes include fatigue, quality of life, fitness measures, body composition, biological outcomes, and program adherence. Cost information will be obtained using patient diary-based self-report and utilities via the EQ-5D.

DISCUSSION

To disseminate publicly funded exercise programs widely, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness have to be demonstrated. The goals of this trial are to provide these data along with an increased understanding of adherence to exercise among men with prostate cancer receiving ADT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (Registration # NCT02834416 ). Registration date was June 2, 2016.