Thermodynamic model for the stabilization of trigonal thiolato mercury(II) in designed three-stranded coiled coils

A thermodynamic model is presented that describes the binding of Hg(II) to de novo designed peptides, Tri L9C and Baby L9C, which were derived from the Tri family. The Tri peptides are based on the parent sequence Ac-NH-G(LKALEEK)(x)()G-CONH(2) and are known to form two-stranded coiled coils at low pH (pH <4) and three-stranded coiled coils at high pH (pH >7). Tri L9C (x = 4) contains a four heptad repeat sequence with cysteine in position 9 and leucines in the other a and d positions; Baby L9C (x = 3), which also has a cysteine in position 9 but is one heptad shorter than Tri L9C, was designed to form less stable helical coiled coils in solution. The free energies of coiled coil formation for Tri, Tri L9C, Baby Tri, and Baby L9C at pH 2.5 and 8.5 were determined by guanidinium denaturation titrations; Tri L9C was observed to be highly helical in the absence of denaturant at pH 8.5 while Baby L9C contained <20% helical content at pH 8.5, indicating a weakly associated or unassociated coiled coil. Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) verified that Baby L9C was a monomer at pH 8.5. The helicity of Baby L9C was induced by addition of HgCl(2). The subsequent formation of a trigonal thiolato Hg(II) in the interior of a three-stranded coiled coil was verified by the presence of a characteristic HgS(3) UV band at 248 nm. Titrations of Tri L9C and Baby L9C into solutions of HgCl(2) at pH values between 7 and 9 were performed to extract binding constants. Global fits to the data employed a mechanism that involved initial binding of mercury to the peptides forming a two-stranded coiled coil with linear thiolato Hg(II) at [peptide]/[Hg] <2, followed by addition of a more weakly associated third helix to generate a three-stranded coiled coil. This mechanism would require the deprotonation of the third cysteine thiol to generate the trigonal thiolato Hg(II) at pH >7.5 [the pK(a) of the cysteine thiol in the presence of Hg(II)]. Support for this mechanism was given by the observation of a three-stranded coiled coil by SEC in a solution of Tri L9C at pH 7.0.

Duration and quality of the prone extension position in four-, six-, and eight-year-old normal children

This study was designed to determine whether developmental changes occur in the duration and quality of maintaining a prone extension position. Three groups of 26 to 30 normal children ages 4, 6, and 8 years were tested on the prone extension position. Results indicated a significant difference in both duration of maintenance and quality between the performance of the four-year-olds and the other two age groups. No significant differences were found between the six- and eight-year-olds. Smooth assumption of the position and distance of thighs off the mat were found to be the most important factors in discriminating a good prone extension position from an inadequate one. The variability of performance by the four-year-olds indicates that the ability to assume and maintain a prone extension position is not a valid measurement tool for discriminating between normal children and those "at risk" for learning disabilities at this age level. The inability of children six years or older to maintain a "good" prone extension position for 30 seconds suggests a vestibular processing inefficiency.