Usability of daily SF36 questionnaires to capture the QALD variation experienced after vaccination with AS03A-adjuvanted monovalent influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in a safety and tolerability study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to describe the short-term reactogenicity of the AS03-adjuvanted H5N1 vaccine expressed through adverse events (AEs) and quality-adjusted life-day (QALD) scores. The AEs are likely to be short-term and therefore the quality of life (QoL) questionnaire, SF-36v2, was administered daily to record changes over seven days. A more sensitive application of this instrument should allow for a better understanding of short-term tolerability of adjuvanted vaccines.

METHODS

Participants (N = 50) received a 2-dose vaccination schedule. Solicited (collected daily: days 0 to 7 [post dose 1] and 21 to 28 [post dose 2]) and unsolicited (collected weekly until day 21) AEs were collected via diary cards. The QoL questionnaires were completed daily (days 0-6) and weekly (days 0, 6, 21, 27) after dose one. Questionnaire data were transformed into SF-6D scores to report QALDs. It was hypothesized post-hoc that the QALD and daily AEs scores should correlate if discrete QoL-changes were captured.

RESULTS

Pain (92%) and muscle ache (66%) were the most commonly reported solicited local and general AEs respectively, neither increased in intensity nor in frequency after dose 2. No safety concerns were identified during the study. A correlation between the daily AEs and QALD scores existed (correlation coefficient, - 0.97 (p < 0.001)). The impact of the AEs scores on the QALD was marginal (- 0.02 max for one day).

CONCLUSION

Similarly with other H5N1 studies, no safety concern was identified throughout the study. Some time-limited variations in QALD-scores were reported. Our results imply that daily administration of the SF-36v2 captures changes in QALD-scores.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov . NCT01788228. Registered 11 February 2013.

Bupropion SR as an aid to smoking cessation in smokers treated previously with bupropion: a randomized placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Many persons who attempt to quit smoking have made previous unsuccessful attempts to quit with pharmacologic aids. An understanding of the impact of these previous attempts to quit is vital for selecting medications that may be more successful in a future attempt to quit. In particular, the effect of repeated use of bupropion SR (Zyban; INN, amfebutamone) on abstinence rates has not been studied previously.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 450 smokers who had previously used bupropion in a smoking cessation attempt. The study consisted of a screening phase, a 12-week treatment phase, and a follow-up at month 6. Participants made regular clinic visits throughout the treatment phase during which they received brief counseling sessions to encourage abstinence from smoking. The primary end point was continuous abstinence from smoking from weeks 4 through 7. Secondary efficacy end points were examined throughout the treatment phase and at follow-up after 6 months.

RESULTS

In participants receiving bupropion SR, 27% (61 of 226) remained abstinent throughout the period from weeks 4 through 7 compared with 5% (11 of 224) of participants receiving placebo (P <.001). Significantly (P <.001) more participants who received bupropion SR during the treatment phase remained continuously abstinent from the start of week 4 through month 6 (27 of 226; 12%) compared with participants who received placebo (5 of 224; 2%). Eleven participants receiving placebo (5%) and 19 participants receiving bupropion SR (8%) stopped taking the study medication because of an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Bupropion SR is an effective medication for retreatment of smokers who have used bupropion SR previously.

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists.

METHODS

This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable.

RESULTS

At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

A dose-ranging study of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex) 200 microg once daily for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and treatment of perennial rhinitis have been demonstrated in adults. However, the dose response of MFNS in pediatric patients has not yet been characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to determine the dose-response relationship of 3 different doses of MFNS in a pediatric population.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study of 679 children 6 to 11 years of age with histories of SAR and documented positive skin test responses. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups for 4 weeks: MFNS 25 microgram once daily, MFNS 100 microgram once daily, MFNS 200 microgram once daily, beclomethasone dipropionate 84 microgram twice daily (168 microgram/day), or placebo. Physician evaluations were performed at days 4, 8, 15, and 29, and patient evaluations were analyzed for days 1 to 15 and 16 to 29.

RESULTS

The mean reduction from baseline in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom scores at day 8 (the primary efficacy variable) was significantly greater in the MFNS and beclomethasone dipropionate groups than in the placebo group (P </=.02). No significant differences were observed among the 3 MFNS groups. However, as treatment continued, symptoms in patients treated with MFNS 100 or 200 microgram once daily continued to improve, whereas those treated with MFNS 25 microgram once daily demonstrated little further improvement. By day 29, MFNS 100 and 200 microgram once daily both were significantly more effective than MFNS 25 microgram once daily in relieving symptoms of SAR, but MFNS 200 microgram provided no additional benefit over MFNS 100 microgram. All doses of MFNS were well tolerated, and cosyntropin stimulation tests performed before and after treatment found no evidence of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the most appropriate therapeutic dosage of MFNS in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years of age is 100 microgram once daily. In addition, MFNS at doses up to 200 microgram once daily for 4 weeks was well tolerated and had no detectable effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function.

A comparison of the actions of H1 and H2 antihistamines on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and cutaneous wheal response in asthmatic patients

The effect of an H1 antihistamine, an H2 antihistamine, and the combination of the two drugs on both histamine-induced bronchoconstriction and dermal whealing was examined in five patients with mild asthma. Chlorpheniramine 8 mg, cimetidine 300 mg, the combination of both, and placebo were administered orally to each patient for a single dose and for seven consecutive doses given every 6 hr after a double-blind, randomized protocol. The airway response to inhaled histamine and the wheal size induced by the intradermal injection of histamine were determined in every patient 2 hr after the final drug dose. The results indicate that a single dose of chlorpheniramine produces a significant increase in the threshold of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction as measured by the provocative histamine dose producing 20% decrease in 1-sec forced expiratory volume (PD20-FEV1), and this effect was significantly enhanced after seven doses. Cimetidine caused a significant decrease in the threshold of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction, but this was not augmented by seven doses. Only chlorpheniramine, when given for seven doses, improved the baseline FEV1 and forced expiratory flow during middle half of forced vital capacity (FEF25%-75%). Chlorpheniramine in both single and multiple doses and the combination of chlorpheniramine and cimetidine given for seven doses produced a significant inhibition of histamine-induced dermal wheals, whereas cimetidine alone had no effect. These results confirm our previous observation that both H1 and H2 receptors are present in the airways of asthmatic patients and that they mediate opposite effects. We also demonstrated a cumulative effect with the repeated administration of chlorpheniramine but not with cimetidine. Finally, the results suggest that the role of H1 and H2 receptors differs in the bronchi from that seen in the dermal vessels of asthmatic patients and are in contrast to those of normals. The H2 receptor effect on histamine-induced skin wheals appears deficient, further supporting earlier suggestions of the presence of an H2 receptor defect in asthmatic patients.

The effects of H1 and H2 antihistamines on histamine inhalation challenges in asthmatic patients

This study was designed to examine the effect of an H1 antihistamine, chlorpheniramine, an H2 antihistamine, cimetidine, and the combination of chlorpheniramine and cimetidine on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in a double-blind, randomized protocol on 11 patients with asthma. Each patient underwent a histamine inhalation challenge on 5 separate days. After a control day, histamine inhalation challenges were performed 2 h after the administration of a single oral dose of 8 mg of chlorpheniramine, 300 mg of cimetidine, the combination of chlorpheniramine and cimetidine, or placebo. Baseline pulmonary function measurements were not significantly altered by the 4 treatments. Body plethysmography data and measurements from the forced vital capacity maneuver were obtained before and after the histamine inhalation challenges. The provocation dose of histamine that produced a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second, a 35% decrease in mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity, and a 50% decrease in specific airway conductance was significantly increased after administration of chlorpheniramine (p less than 0.002) and decreased after administration of cimetidine (p less than 0.02), where as no significant effect was noted after the combination of chlorpheniramine and cimetidine. The results suggest the presence of both H1 and H2 receptors in the airways of asthmatic patients.