Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

[Systemic sclerosis]

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a very heterogeneous, chronic, rare, but socioeconomically important disease with a severe disease course and severe impairment of the quality of life of affected patients.

OBJECTIVES

Overview of the current state of research on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of SSc.

METHODS

A literature search was performed.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis of SSc is not fully understood. ACR/EULAR criteria allow the diagnosis of early forms of SSc. Classification into limited cutaneous SSc and diffuse cutaneous SSc is of prognostic and therapeutic relevance. New organ-specific treatment options for SSc have led to improved quality of life and prognosis.

POS0318 CLINICAL PHENOTYPE IN SCLERODERMA PATIENTS WITH ANTI-TOPOISOMERASE I POSITIVITY AND LIMITED CUTANEOUS FORM: DATA FROM THE EUSTAR DATABASE

Background:

There is renewed interest in the role of autoantibodies to predict outcomes in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Among the newly identified subsets, patients with limited cutaneous form (lcSSc) but anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (Scl70) positivity draw particular attention, and namely, assessing the risk of developing interstitial lung disease (ILD) —the main cause of death in SSc—to improve the management of Scl70-lcSSc patients.

Objectives:

We aimed to characterize patients with Scl70-lcSSc in the large multicenter European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) cohort.

Methods:

The EUSTAR database was locked in July 2019. We included all patients fulfilling 1980 ACR and/or 2013 ACR/EULAR criteria for SSc, with disease duration at database entry ≤3 yrs and known and stable skin form during the first 3 yrs. Patients with lcSSc were compared: Scl70-lcSSc (target group) vs. ACA-lcSSc and ANA-lcSSc (Step 1); and Scl70-lcSSc vs. Scl70-dcSSc (Step 2). In the ANA subgroup we included ANA+ patients with negative SSc-specific antibodies (Scl70, ACA, RNA polymerase III). In each step, we performed 5 generalized mixed models (GMM) for the risk of the new onset of ILD (defined by imaging), primary myocardial involvement (PMI), pulmonary hypertension (PH), “any severe” (ILD+PMI+PH+scleroderma renal crisis) and all-cause-mortality. An additional GMM assessed the risk of forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥10% vs. FVC value at ILD onset. Each GMM was adjusted for age, sex and confounders.

Results:

Overall, 1285 SSc patients were included: 1068 (83%) females, 860 (67%) lcSSc and 425 (33%) dcSSc. Among patients with lcSSc, 537 (62%) had ACA+, 194 (23%) Scl70+ and 129 (15%) ANA+; 425 patients had dcSSc and Scl70+. Median follow-up was similar in all 4 groups: 7.2 to 8.1 yrs.

Step 1: At baseline, Scl70-lcSSc patients had significantly shorter time from Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) to SSc onset, higher mRSS (5.8±4.8 vs. 4.3±4, p=0.001), and higher rate of articular and muscular involvement vs. ACA-lcSSc patients (Figure 1). No differences were found between Scl70-lcSSc and ANA-lcSSc comparing the aforementioned variables. ILD was more frequent in Scl70-lcSSc (46%) than in ACA-lcSSc (10%) and ANA-lcSSc (25%), as well as restrictive lung disease. GMM showed that Scl70-lcSSc carries a higher risk of ILD than both ACA-lcSSc (HR 4.55, 95%CI 3.23-6.67) and ANA-lcSSc (HR 2.17, 95%CI 1.39-3.45), with a rate of FVC decline ≥10% over time similar to the other limited forms. In Scl70-lcSSc patients the risk of “any severe” organ involvement was similar to ANA-lcSSc and higher than ACA-lcSSc (HR 1.89, 95%CI 1.40-2.50). In particular, Scl70-lcSSc shows a risk of PMI similar to ANA-lcSSc and lower than ACA-lcSSc; no differences regarding PH risk. The mortality risk in patients with Scl70-lcSSc was similar to the other limited forms’.

Step 2: At baseline, time from RP to SSc onset was longer in patients with Scl70-lcSSc, with less frequent joint synovitis and tendon friction rubs vs. patients with Scl70-dcSSc. Conversely, the frequency of muscular, cardiac and pulmonary involvement was similar. The risk of ILD in Scl70-lcSSc patients was similar to Scl70-dcSSc, with a lower risk of FVC decline ≥10% over time. The risk of “any severe” involvement (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.49-0.83), PMI and PH was lower and the mortality risk tended to be lower (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.33-1.01, p=0.053) vs. Scl70-dcSSc.

Conclusion:

In our large multicenter EUSTAR cohort one quarter of lcSSc patients were Scl70+. We show a ranking for major organ involvement within lcSSc: Scl70 the most severe, ANA+ intermediate and ACA the milder form. Scl70-dcSSc patients present the most severe phenotype, and Scl70 positivity, more than the cutaneous subset, is strongly predictive of ILD, whereas other variables may influence progression. These results may provide new insight to improve the management of Scl70-lcSSc patients.

Disclosure of Interests:

Elisabetta Zanatta: None declared, Dörte Huscher: None declared, Paolo Airò: None declared, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman: None declared, Elise Siegert: None declared, Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Marco Matucci-Cerinic: None declared, Franco Cozzi: None declared, Gabriela Riemekasten: None declared, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: Kymera Therapeutics, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Stefan Heitmann: None declared, Nicolas Hunzelmann: None declared, Carlomaurizio Montecucco: None declared, Jadranka Morovic-Vergles: None declared, Camillo Ribi: None declared, Andrea Doria: None declared, Yannick Allanore: None declared

POS0861 EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF TOCILIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS: A PROPENSITY SCORE CONTROL MATCHED OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF THE EUSTAR COHORT

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) showed trends for improving skin fibrosis and prevented progression of lung fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in placebo-controlled randomised clinical trials (RCTs). However, safety and effectiveness of TCZ beyond these selected and enriched clinical trial populations in SSc is still unknown.

Objectives:

To assess safety and effectiveness of TCZ treatment compared to standard of care in SSc patients from the large, multicentre, observational, real-life EUSTAR network/database using propensity score matching.

Methods:

SSc patients from the EUSTAR network/database, who fulfilled the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria, with a baseline and a follow-up visit at 12±3 months, receiving TCZ or standard of care (controls), were selected. The following variables were used for the propensity score matching (1:1): age at diagnosis, gender, disease subtype, baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), co-therapy with immunosuppressives, disease duration, and year of treatment. Primary endpoints were mRSS and FVC at 12±3 months follow-up compared between the groups, using paired t-tests. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of progressive/regressive patients for skin and lung at 12±3 months follow-up according to standard definitions (1,2). Sensitivity analyses assessed pre-processing decisions (selection of most recent vs. random observation for control patients with multiple suitable time intervals), as well as the matching method (optimal vs. exact matching). Missing values were addressed with 100-fold multiple imputation using chained equations. Safety data were analysed in all patients. The study including the statistical analysis plan was pre-registered at www.drks.de (DRKS-ID: DRKS00015537).

Results:

We identified 93 SSc patients treated with TCZ and 2370 SSc patients with standard of care who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Forty nine (57.7%) of the TCZ treated patients were diffuse, eight patients were not classified, disease duration was (mean±SD) 6.35±5.40 years, their baseline mRSS was 15.05±10.85, and 76 (81.7%) received immunosuppressive therapy in addition to TCZ.Through multiple imputation and propensity score matching, 100 imputed sets of 93 pairs of TCZ/controls were generated. Comparison between groups showed consistent effects of TCZ across all pre-defined primary and secondary endpoints: mRSS was lower in the TCZ group (mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) -1.8 (-4.79 to 1.19), p=0.24, Figure 1A). Similarly, FVC % predicted was higher in the TCZ group mean difference (2.25, 95% CI -4.57 to 9.06), p=0.51, Figure 1B). Considering secondary endpoints, the percentage of skin progressors as well as lung progressors at follow up was lower in the TCZ group (odds ratio OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.07 to 6.41), p=0.74 and OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.16 to 1.7); p=0.2, respectively. Consistently, the percentage of regressors for skin (OR 1.6 (95% CI 0.56 to 4.54), p=0.38) and for lung (OR 1.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 4.58), p=0.26) was higher in TCZ. These results were robust regarding the sensitivity analyses. Safety analysis confirmed previously reported adverse event profiles.

Conclusion:

In this large, observational, controlled, real-life EUSTAR study, effectiveness of TCZ did not reach statistical significance compared to standard of care treatment but showed consistent positive effects of TCZ on skin and lung fibrosis across all pre-defined primary and secondary endpoints confirming data from recent RCTs.

References:

[1]Prediction of improvement in skin fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2016:1743-8.

[2]Progressive interstitial lung disease in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in the EUSTAR database. Ann Rheum Dis 2021:219-227.

Disclosure of Interests:

Simon Kuster: None declared, Suzana Jordan: None declared, Muriel Daniele Elhai: None declared, Ulrike Held: None declared, Klaus Steigmiller: None declared, Cosimo Bruni: None declared, Florenzo Iannone: None declared, Serena Vettori: None declared, Elise Siegert: None declared, Simona Rednic: None declared, Veronica Codullo: None declared, Paolo Airò Consultant of: Dr. Airo’ reports personal fees (consultancies) from Bristol Myers Squibb, Bohringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from CSL Behring, SOBI, Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Pfizer, Yolanda Braun-Moscovici: None declared, Nicolas Hunzelmann: None declared, Maria Joao Salvador: None declared, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Ana Maria Gheorghiu: None declared, Juan Jose Alegre Sancho: None declared, Katarzyna Romanowska-Prochnicka: None declared, Ivan Castellví: None declared, Ina Koetter: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet Consultant of: Marie-Elise Truchetet has had consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech/Roche, and Sanofi in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications., Grant/research support from: Marie-Elise Truchetet has had consultancy relationships and/or has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech/Roche, and Sanofi in the area of potential treatments of scleroderma and its complications., Francisco J López-Longo: None declared, Pavel Novikov: None declared, Alessandro Giollo: None declared, Yuichiro Shirai: None declared, Laura Belloli: None declared, Elisabetta Zanatta: None declared, Eric Hachulla: None declared, Vanessa Smith: None declared, Christopher Denton: None declared, Ruxandra Ionescu: None declared, Tim Schmeiser: None declared, Jörg H.W. Distler: None declared, Armando Gabrielli: None declared, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Consultant of: AMHV has received research funding and/or consulting fees and/or other remuneration from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ARXX, Lilly and Medscape, Grant/research support from: AMHV has received research funding and/or consulting fees and/or other remuneration from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ARXX, Lilly and Medscape. Masataka Kuwana: None declared, Yannick Allanore: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Oliver Distler has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Oliver Distler has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: The study was partially supported by a grant from Roche. Roche was not involved in analysis or interpretation of the results.

POS0834 LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF SSC ASSOCIATED ILD: IMPROVED SURVIVAL IN PPI TREATED PATIENTS

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs frequently in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). PPI use has to been shown to improve survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, whereas to date there are no data on the use of PPI in SSc-ILD.

Objectives:

This study was aimed to assess whether use of PPI is associated with progression of SSc-ILD and survival.

Methods:

We retrospectively analysed 1931 patients with SSc and SSc-ILD from the German Network for Systemic Sclerosis (DNSS) database (2003 onwards). Kaplan–Meier analysis compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with vs. without GERD (SSc and SSc-ILD), and PPI vs. no PPI use (SSc-ILD only). Progression was defined as a decrease in either % predicted forced vital capacity ≥10% or single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide ≥15%, or death.

Results:

GERD was not associated with decreased OS or PFS in patients with either SSc or SSc-ILD. In patients with SSc-ILD, PPI use was associated with improved OS vs. no PPI use after 1 year (98.4% [95% confidence interval: 97.6–99.3]; n=760 vs. 90.8% [87.9–93.8]; n=290) and after 5 years (91.4% [89.2–93.8]; n=357 vs. 70.9% [65.2–77.1]; n=106; p<0.0001). PPI use was also associated with improved PFS vs. no PPI use after 1 year (95.9% [94.6–97.3]; n=745 vs. 86.4% [82.9–90.1]; n=278) and after 5 years (66.8% [63.0–70.8]; n=286 vs. 45.9% [39.6–53.2]; n=69; p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

GERD had no effect on survival in SSc or SSc-ILD. PPIs improved survival in patients with SSc-ILD; however, controlled, prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding.

Disclosure of Interests:

Michael Kreuter Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Consultant of: Boehringer, Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Francesco Bonella Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, GSK, Consultant of: Boehringer, Roche, GSK, Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Kuhr Kathrin: None declared, Jörg Henes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Boehringer, Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: Boehringer, Celgene, Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Grant/research support from: Chugai, Roche, Janssen, Novartis, SOBI, Pfizer, Elise Siegert: None declared, Gabriela Riemekasten Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GSK, Boehringer, Consultant of: Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer, Norbert Blank Consultant of: Sobi, Novartis, Roche, UCB, MSD, Pfizer, Actelion, Abbvie, Boehringer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi, Christiane Pfeiffer: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner: None declared, Alexander Kreuter Speakers bureau: MSD, Boehringer, InfectoPharm, Paid instructor for: MSD, PETER KORSTEN Consultant of: Glaxo, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Chugai, Sanofi, Lilly, Boehringer, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Glaxo, Aaron Juche: None declared, Marc Schmalzing Speakers bureau: Chugai Roche, Boehringer, Celgene, Medac, UCB, Paid instructor for: Novartis, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Chugai Roche, Janssen, Consultant of: Chugai Roche, Hexal Sandoz, Gilead, Abbvie, Janssen, Boehringer, Margitta Worm Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Ilona Jandova Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Novartis, Abbvie, Laura Susok Speakers bureau: MSD, Novartis, BMS, Sunpharma, Consultant of: MSD, Tim Schmeiser Consultant of: Abbvie, Boehringer, Novartis, UCB, Claudia Guenther Paid instructor for: Advisory Board Boehringer January 2020, Employee of: Novartis 2002-2005, Gernot Keyszer Consultant of: Boehringer, Jan Ehrchen Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Janssen, Chugai, Sobi, Employee of: Pfizer, Actelion (now Janssen), Andreas Ramming Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: Boehringer, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Ina Kötter Speakers bureau: several companies, Consultant of: several companies, Grant/research support from: several companies, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Actelion, Alexion Amgen, Bayer Vital, Baxter, Biogen, Boehringer, BMS, Celgene, Fresenius, Genzyme, GSK, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mundipharm, Mylan, Novartis, Octapharm, Pfizer, Roche Chugai, Sandoz, Sanofi, Shire SOBI, Thermo Fischer, UCB, Grant/research support from: basic research studies: Pfizer, Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Roche Chugai, Pia Moinzadeh Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Actelion, Grant/research support from: Actelion, Nicolas Hunzelmann Speakers bureau: Boehringer Janssen, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Boehringer

POS0855 PATIENT PREFERENCES, TRADE-OFFS AND ACCEPTABLE RISKS IN THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-ASSOCIATED INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE: A STEP TOWARDS SHARED DECISION-MAKING

Background:

Current treatments for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) are characterised by different attributes such as mode of administration, adverse events (AE) and efficacy. Physicians and patients often have different perspectives on treatments, thus shared decision-making between patients and physicians is essential. An understanding of patients’ decision processes when weighing treatment attributes and the trade-offs they are willing to make is important for shared decision-making.

Objectives:

The study aimed to 1) identify relevant treatment attributes, 2) elicit patient preferences for these attributes and 3) quantify preference as relative attribute importance (RAI; a higher RAI indicates that more of the variability in patients’ responses may be explained by changes in the attribute); and maximum acceptable risk (MAR) of diarrhoea, nausea and/or vomiting (MAR is a trade-off measure that evaluates attributes in risk-equivalences as a unit of measurement).

Methods:

A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was created, based on a literature review, a patient advisory board, qualitative patient interviews, and a workshop involving SSc-ILD expert physicians. Seven SSc-ILD treatment attributes were identified: 1) mode of administration; 2) shortness of breath; 3) skin tightness; 4) cough; 5) tiredness; 6) risk of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) AEs; and 7) risk of serious and non-serious infections. The levels of AE risk were informed by frequencies observed in clinical trials and patient input during the interviews. The DCE was integrated into an online survey, which asked patients to make repeated choices between two alternatives described by varying levels of included attributes. Patients with SSc-ILD were recruited by physician referral from Switzerland, Norway, France, Germany and the USA. DCE data were analysed using a logit model, and RAI and MAR measures were calculated.

Results:

A total of 231 patients with physician-confirmed SSc-ILD (mean age 52.6±13.2 years; 54% diagnosed for >5 years) completed the survey. Patients with SSc-ILD mostly preferred twice-daily oral treatments (p<0.001) and infusion every 6–12 months (p<0.001) over monthly infusions. Patients’ choices were mostly affected by the risk of GIT AEs (RAI=25%; 95% CI 22–28%) and risk of infections (RAI=20%; 95% CI 16–24%). Improvements in shortness of breath and type and severity of cough were jointly more important than improvement in skin tightness (p<0.001).

Patients accepted an additional 21% risk (95% CI 13–29%) of GIT AEs if they could reduce the frequency of infusions from monthly to 6–12 monthly, or accepted an extra 15% (95% CI 7–23%) increase in risk if changing to an oral treatment twice daily. Among symptoms, an additional 28% (95% CI 20–36%) risk of GIT AEs was considered acceptable if the severity of patients’ persistent cough was reduced to a level that was easier to tolerate, even if it remained persistent. Similarly, a 37% (95% CI 28–46%) increase in the risk of GIT AEs was acceptable if it resulted in breathlessness during routine activities rather than breathlessness at rest. Finally, patients were willing to accept an additional 36% risk (95% CI 27–45%) of GIT AEs if it reduced their risk of non-serious infections from 30% to 15% and of serious infections from 10% to 5%.

Conclusion:

This is the first study to quantitatively elicit patients’ preferences for attributes of SSc-ILD treatments. Preferences were driven by safety, efficacy and technical considerations. Patients showed willingness to make trade-offs, providing a firm basis for shared decision-making in routine clinical practice.

Disclosure of Interests:

Cosimo Bruni Speakers bureau: Actelion, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Gruppo Italiano Lotta alla Scleroderma (GILS), Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sull’Artrite (FIRA), New Horizon Fellowship, European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR), Foundation for Research in Rheumatology (FOREUM)., Sebastian Heidenreich Consultant of: Sebastian Heidenreich, PhD is employed by Evidera Inc, a business unit of PPD. Evidera is a CRO that offers paid research services to pharmaceutical companies., Ashley Duenas Consultant of: Yes. I am an employee of Evidera which received funding from Boehringer Ingelheim for work related to this study., Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lilly, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, ARXX, Lilly and Medscape, Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Armando Gabrielli Grant/research support from: Pfizer Bhering, Yannick Allanore Consultant of: Honorarium received from Boehringer, Medsenic,

Sanofi, Menarini, Grant/research support from: Grants received from Alpine, Ose Immunogenetics, Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Jörg H.W. Distler Shareholder of: JHWD is stock owner of 4D Science, Consultant of: JHWD has consultancy relationships with Actelion, Active Biotech, Anamar, ARXX, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, JB Therapeutics, Medac, Pfizer, RuiYi and UCB, Grant/research support from: JHWD has received research funding from Anamar, Active Biotech, Array Biopharma, ARXX, aTyr, BMS, Bayer Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, GSK, Inventiva, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, RedX, UCB, Eric Hachulla: None declared, Vivian Hsu Speakers bureau: I am a speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: with Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Grant/research support from: Principal Investigator for several clinical trials, currently with Genentech, Corbus Pharmaceutical, and EICOS, Nicolas Hunzelmann Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, Sanofi, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc (less than 5%), Consultant of: Paid Consultant for: Acceleron, Actelion, Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Corbus, Gilead, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Horizon, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and United Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: Research Grant support from: Immune Tolerance Network, Bayer, BMS, Horizon, Pfizer, Employee of: Leadership/Equity position – Chief Medical Officer, CiviBioPharma/Eicos Sciences, Inc – recieves a stipend for role as Chief Medical Officer, which would technically qualify as emplyoment., Marie-Elise Truchetet Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Sobi, Boehringer, Paid instructor for: Lilly, Consultant of: UCB, Sobi, Abbvie, Grant/research support from: UCB, Gilead, Ulrich Walker Shareholder of: Bayer, NASDAQ, MSCI-World ETF’s, Speakers bureau: All companies producing pharmaceuticals used in AIDS, Paid instructor for: Roche, Abbvie, Novartis, Consultant of: All companies producing pharmaceuticals used in AIDS, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Abbvie, (in the last two years). Other companies in previous years., Margarida Alves Employee of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Nils Schoof Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lesley Ann Saketkoo Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, United Therapeutics, Consultant of: Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Corbus, EICOS, Janssen, Horizon, United Therapeutics, Inc, Grant/research support from: Mallinckrodt, United Therapeutics, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, IQone, Roche, Consultant of: OD has/had consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years):

Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB. Patent issued “mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis” (US8247389, EP2331143)., Grant/research support from: Kymera Therapeutics, Mitsubishi Tanabe

Peanut-induced anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry

BACKGROUND

Peanut allergy has a rising prevalence in high-income countries, affecting 0.5%-1.4% of children. This study aimed to better understand peanut anaphylaxis in comparison to anaphylaxis to other food triggers in European children and adolescents.

METHODS

Data was sourced from the European Anaphylaxis Registry via an online questionnaire, after in-depth review of food-induced anaphylaxis cases in a tertiary paediatric allergy centre.

RESULTS

3514 cases of food anaphylaxis were reported between July 2007 - March 2018, 56% in patients younger than 18 years. Peanut anaphylaxis was recorded in 459 children and adolescents (85% of all peanut anaphylaxis cases). Previous reactions (42% vs. 38%; p = .001), asthma comorbidity (47% vs. 35%; p < .001), relevant cofactors (29% vs. 22%; p = .004) and biphasic reactions (10% vs. 4%; p = .001) were more commonly reported in peanut anaphylaxis. Most cases were labelled as severe anaphylaxis (Ring&Messmer grade III 65% vs. 56% and grade IV 1.1% vs. 0.9%; p = .001). Self-administration of intramuscular adrenaline was low (17% vs. 15%), professional adrenaline administration was higher in non-peanut food anaphylaxis (34% vs. 26%; p = .003). Hospitalization was higher for peanut anaphylaxis (67% vs. 54%; p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The European Anaphylaxis Registry data confirmed peanut as one of the major causes of severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reactions in European children, with some characteristic features e.g., presence of asthma comorbidity and increased rate of biphasic reactions. Usage of intramuscular adrenaline as first-line treatment is low and needs to be improved. The Registry, designed as the largest database on anaphylaxis, allows continuous assessment of this condition.

[Reality of inpatient vasoactive treatment with prostacyclin derivatives in patients with acral circulation disorders due to systemic sclerosis in Germany]

Hintergrund

Das Raynaud-Phänomen und die damit häufig einhergehenden digitalen Ulzerationen stellen für Patienten mit systemischer Sklerose (Sklerodermie [SSc]) ein frühes und sehr belastendes Symptom mit bedeutenden Einschränkungen der Arbeitsfähigkeit und Lebensqualität dar. Der Einsatz vasoaktiver Medikamente (insbesondere intravenöser Prostazyklinderivate) soll helfen, das Risiko hypoxischer Gewebeschäden bis hin zum Verlust der Finger zu reduzieren.

Methoden

Um Aufschluss über die aktuelle Versorgung von Patienten mit Prostazyklinderivaten im klinischen Alltag in Deutschland zu erhalten, führten wir eine Umfrage unter den im Deutschen Netzwerk für systemische Sklerodermie (DNSS) zusammengeschlossenen Kliniken durch. Zusätzlich erfolgte eine separate Patientenbefragung über die Sklerodermie Selbsthilfe e. V., die sich nur auf die Symptome „Raynaud-Phänomen“ und „Digitale Ulzera“ und den Einsatz intravenöser Prostazyklinderivate bezog.

Ergebnisse

Von den befragten 433 Patienten gaben 56 % an, dass sie bereits aufgrund ihrer Erkrankung und Symptome mit Prostazyklinderivaten behandelt wurden. Insgesamt 61 % erhielten die Therapie aufgrund starker Raynaud-Symptomatik und 39 % aufgrund digitaler Ulzerationen. Die meisten Befragten erfuhren durch die Therapie nicht nur eine Verbesserung des Raynaud-Phänomens und der digitalen Ulzera, sondern auch eine wesentliche Verbesserung von Einschränkungen im Alltag. Sie gaben zudem an, wesentlich weniger fremde Hilfe in Anspruch genommen sowie wesentlich weniger Fehlzeiten bei der Arbeit gehabt zu haben.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Patienten empfanden durchweg einen positiven Effekt der Therapie mit Prostazyklinderivaten auf das Raynaud-Phänomen, ihre digitalen Ulzerationen, Schmerzen und Alltagseinschränkung und fühlten sich durch die stationäre Therapie gut und sicher betreut. Diese positiven Effekte in der Patientenwahrnehmung sind eine eindrückliche Stütze und bestätigen nachdrücklich die auf europäischer und internationaler Ebene erarbeiteten Therapieempfehlungen.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00393-019-00743-9) enthält die 2 Fragebögen, die für die Befragung verwendet wurden. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

OP0137 GENOME-WIDE WHOLE-BLOOD TRANSCRIPTOME PROFILING IN A LARGE EUROPEAN COHORT OF SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS PATIENTS

Background:

The analysis of annotated transcripts from genome-wide expression studies data is of paramount importance to understand the molecular phenomena underlying the occurrence of complex diseases, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Objectives:

To perform whole-blood transcriptome and pathway analysis on whole-blood (WB) RNA collected in two cohorts of European SSc patients. Via a discovery and validation strategy we aimed at characterizing the molecular pathways that differentiate SSc from controls and that are reproducible in geographically diverse populations.

Methods:

WB samples from 252 controls and 162 SSc patients were collected in RNA stabilizers. Patients were divided into a discovery (n=79; Southern Europe) and validation cohort (n=83; Central-Western Europe). RNA sequencing was performed by an Illumina assay. Functional annotations of Reactome pathways were performed with the FAIME algorithm. In parallel, a immunophenotyping analysis on 28 circulating cell populations was assessed. We then tested: the presence of differentially expressed genes or pathways and the correlation between absolute cell counts and RNA transcripts/FAIME scores in regression models. Results significant in both populations were considered as replicated.

Results:

A total of 15224 genes and 1277 related functional pathways were available for analysis. Among these, 99 genes and 225 pathways were significant in both sets. The heatmap in figure shows the relative expression of replicated pathways and the distribution of cases and controls (red and green bars). Among the significant pathways we found a deregulation in: type-I IFN, TLR-cascade and signalling, function of the tumor suppressor p53 protein, platelet degranulation and activation. Correlation analysis showed that the count of several cell subtypes is jointly associated with RNA transcripts or FAIME scores with strong differences in relation to the geographical origin of samples; neutrophils emerged as the major determinant of gene expression in SSc-whole-blood samples.

Conclusion:

We discovered a set of differentially expressed genes and pathways that could be validated in two independent sets of SSc patients highlighting a number of deregulated molecular processes that have relevance for the pathogenesis of autoimmunity and SSc.

Acknowledgments:

This work was supported by EU/EFPIA/Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking PRECISESADS grant No. 115565.

Disclosure of Interests:

Lorenzo Beretta Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Guillermo Barturen: None declared, Barbara Vigone: None declared, Chiara Bellocchi: None declared, Nicolas Hunzelmann: None declared, Ellen Delanghe: None declared, László Kovács: None declared, Ricard Cervera: None declared, Maria Gerosa: None declared, Rafaela Ortega Castro: None declared, Isabel Almeida: None declared, Divi Cornec: None declared, Carlo Chizzolini Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Jacques-Olivier Pers: None declared, Zuzanna Makowska Employee of: Bayer AG, Anne buttgereit Employee of: Bayer AG, Ralf Lesche Employee of: Bayer, Martin Kerick: None declared, Marta Alarcon-Riquelme: None declared, Javier Martin Ibanez: None declared

AB0584 DOES ANTI-ACID TREATMENT INFLUENCE DISEASE PROGRESSION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (SSC-ILD)? DATA FROM THE GERMAN SSC-NETWORK

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common in SSc and thus treatment with anti-acid therapy (AAT) is frequent. An association between GER and the development / progression of SSc-ILD has been hypothesized. However, outcomes of AAT on disease progression in SSc-ILD has only sparsely been studied.

Objectives:

Methods:

The German Network for Systemic Scleroderma (DNSS), which includes SSc pts. prospectively, was analyzed for SSc-ILD. Those without progression at ILD 1stdiagnosis were categorized in AAT vs. no-AAT users and disease outcome was assessed.

Results:

SSc-ILD was reported in 1165 (28.2%) out of 4131 pts. 712 of SSc-ILD pts had no disease progression at ILD 1stdiagnosis. 567 used AAT while 145 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups with regards to age (mean 54.7 years), BMI, time since SSc diagnosis and immunosuppressant use. Significant differences in no-AAT vs. AAT were found for gender (male 18% vs. 25%, p=0.05), SSc subtype (p=0.002, diffuse more common in AAT), lung function (DLCO 66% vs. 58%, p=0.001; FVC 86% vs. 77%, p=0.001), mRSS (8 vs. 11.5, p<0.01), esophageal involvement (32% vs. 56%, p<0.01) and steroid use (30% vs. 43%, p=0.005). While mortality did not differ between groups (3.9%, p= 0.59), disease progression was more common in the AAT group than in no-AAT users (24.5% vs. 13%, p=0.03). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in decline of FVC≥10% with 30% in the AAT compared to 14% in no-AAT (p=0.018); a decline in DLCO≥15% was more common in the AAT group by trend (23% vs. 14%, p=0.087).

Conclusion:

While results may have partially been biased by differences in baseline characteristics, this current analysis disfavors the approach of AAT use for SSc-ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Michael Kreuter Grant/research support from: Roche, Boehringer, Consultant of: Roche, Boehringer, Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, Francesco Bonella Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Consultant of: Boehringer, Roche, Bristol MS, Galapagos, Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, Gabriela Riemekasten Consultant of: Cell Trend GmbH, Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Ulf Müller-Ladner Speakers bureau: Biogen, Jörg Henes Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim,, Elise Siegert Grant/research support from: Actelion, Consultant of: AEC, Speakers bureau: NA, Claudia Guenther: None declared, Ina Koetter Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Actelion, Celgene, MSD, UCB, Sanofi, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Chugai, Roche, Boehringer, Norbert Blank Speakers bureau: Actelion, Roche, Boehringer, Pfizer, Chugai, Christiane Pfeiffer: None declared, Marc Schmalzing: None declared, Gabriele Zeidler: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Grant/research support from: Novartis, Juarms GmbH, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, chugai, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi aventis, Laura Susok: None declared, Aaron Juche: None declared, Margitta Worm Consultant of: Mylan Gemany, Bencard Allergie, BBV Technologies S.A., Novartis, Biotest, Sanofi, Aimmune Therapies, Regeneron, Speakers bureau: ALK-Abello, Novartis, Sanofi, Biotest, Mylan, Actelion, HAL Allergie, Aimmune Bencard Allergie, Ilona Jandova: None declared, Jan Ehrchen: None declared, Cord Sunderkoetter: None declared, Gernot Keyszer: None declared, Andreas Ramming Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, Tim Schmeiser Speakers bureau: Actelion, UCB, Pfizer, Alexander Kreuter Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Abbvie, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Boehringer, Kathrin Kuhr: None declared, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Grant/research support from: Consultancy and/or speaker fees and/or travel reimbursements: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly. Scientific support and/or educational seminars and/or clinical studies: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, Thermo Fisher., Consultant of: see above, Pia Moinzadeh: None declared, Nicolas Hunzelmann Speakers bureau: Actelion, Boehringer

[Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease]

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a fibrosing autoimmune disease of the connective tissue. In addition to skin fibrosis, pulmonary involvement and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in particular are the most common and severe manifestations of SSc. The disease is associated with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in progressive ILD. In the last 5 years new treatment concepts for SSc-ILD have been investigated in numerous clinical studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review is based on a literature search in PubMed, focusing on the most relevant papers published up to the end of 2018 with the keywords "SSc" and "treatment".

RESULTS

The treatment of SSc-ILD has changed over the last few years due to the results of many clinical studies. The updated guidelines of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommend the use of cyclophosphamide or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Data for a positive influence on SSc-ILD are also available for mycophenolate, tocilizumab and anabasum. Because of the pathophysiological similarities to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the use of the antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone is currently being investigated in randomized, multicenter clinical trials and could be a novel and promising therapeutic strategy.

CONCLUSION

Current drug studies may provide innovative therapeutic perspectives for SSc-ILD and could significantly improve the prognosis of affected patients in the future.

Dose-response relationship of a new Timothy grass pollen allergoid in comparison with a 6-grass pollen allergoid

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy with grass pollen allergoids has been proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Based on the extensive cross-reactivity among Pooideae species, it has been suggested that grass pollen extracts could be prepared from a single species, rather than from a multiple species mixture.

OBJECTIVE

To find the optimal dose of a Phleum pratense (P. pratense) allergoid preparation and compare its efficacy and safety to a 6-grass pollen allergoid preparation.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study (EudraCT: 2011-000674-58), three doses of P. pratense allergoid (1800 therapeutic units (TU), standard-dose 6000 TU and 18 000 TU) were compared with placebo and the marketed 6-grass pollen allergoid (6000 TU). In a pre-seasonal dosing regimen, 102 patients were randomized to five treatment groups and received nine subcutaneous injections. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in weal size (late-phase reaction [LPR]) in response to the intracutaneous testing (ICT) before and after treatment, comparing the active allergoids to placebo. Secondary outcomes were the change in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) assessed in the allergen exposure chamber (AEC), the changes in P. pratense-serum-specific IgG₄ and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

All three doses of the P. pratense and the 6-grass pollen allergoid preparations were significantly superior to placebo for the primary outcome, whereas there were no significant differences in the change in TNSS. Compared to the standard-dose, the high-dose of P. pratense did not produce any additional significant benefit, but showed a slight increase in AEs. Yet this increase in AEs was lower than for the 6-grass pollen preparation.

CONCLUSIONS & CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The standard-dose of the new P. pratense allergoid was comparable to the marketed 6-grass pollen preparation at equal dose for the parameters measured.

European Dermatology Forum S1-guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present guideline focuses on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, current strategies in the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this guideline provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes of systemic sclerosis with diseases of the rheumatological spectrum.

European dermatology forum S1-guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 2: Scleromyxedema, scleredema and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present guideline focuses on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, current strategies in the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 2 of this guideline provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of scleromyxedema, scleredema (of Buschke) and nephrogenic systemic sclerosis (nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy).

[Systemic sclerosis. Current classification and diagnosis of organ involvement]

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease with unknown etiology, which leads to deposition of collagen and extracellular matrix proteins in the skin and affected internal organs. The diagnosis of SSc is based on clinical, serological, and paraclinical examinations. In 2013 new criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis, which also take early forms of SSc into consideration, were developed. A complete clinical and paraclinical examination is important for the oligosymptomatic early stages and the subsequent disease course of SSc in order to diagnose and timely treat a developing organ involvement.

[Digital ulcers in systemic scleroderma]

Digital ulcers (DU's) are one of the main symptoms of systemic scleroderma and occur in approximately 60% of all scleroderma patients. Due to possible complications such as infections, gangrene or amputation, they require regular medical attention and a good wound treatment by doctors and nursing staff. A definition of DU's has not yet been established. In 2009 the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published guidelines for the treatment of DU's. An improvement of the healing of active ulcers has been described with Iloprost. Bosentan significantly reduced the frequency of occurrence of new DU's. In some small studies PDE-5 inhibitors appear helpful. Further studies with other therapeutic approaches will follow in the next few years.

[Differential diagnoses of Raynaud's phenomenon]

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) is characterized by repeated vasospastic attacks of the distal extremities induced by cold, humidity, vibrations or emotional stress. It typically presents a triphasic colour change from white (palor; vasoconstriction) to blue (cyanosis) and red (reactive hyperaemia). The symptoms are based on a primary RP in 90 %. Secondary RP is a symptom of an underlying disease. RP has to be distinguished from other colour changes of the distal extremities like acrocyanosis, erythromelalgia, perniosis and Chilblain-Lupus. Patients history, clinical examination, ANA, ESR/CRP and nailfold capillaroscopy are essential for the early diagnosis of an underlying disease. The initiation of angiologic tests is important in patients with digital ulcers, necrosis or gangrene. Important differential diagnoses in secondary RP are autoimmune rheumatic diseases like systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematodes as well as vascular diseases like arterial occlusions and compression syndromes or concomitant medication (i. e. beta-blocker).

[The German network for systemic sclerosis (DNSS): current data on diagnostics and therapy]

An essential prerequisite for progress in understanding the pathophysiology and the clinical treatment of rare diseases is the national cooperation of specialized centers. The German network for systemic sclerosis (DNSS) is such an interdisciplinary union of hospitals and research centers with a special interest in systemic sclerosis (SSc). A core activity is the patient register of the DNSS which includes over 3,100 patients. It is one of largest national registers of SSc patients worldwide and comprises prospective data on diagnostics as well as primarily therapy of the patients. The register has now proven to be an extremely successful basis for clinical research and basic studies within the framework of international cooperation. The most important results of the cooperation and the register will be presented in this article.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of safety and efficacy of miltefosine in antihistamine-resistant chronic spontaneous urticaria

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), a mast cell-driven condition, is debilitating, common, and hard to treat. Miltefosine, a lipid raft modulator, can inhibit mast cell responses in vivo.

OBJECTIVE

To study the safety and efficacy of systemic miltefosine treatment in CSU patients resistant to standard-dosed antihistamines.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, CSU patients were treated for 4 weeks with daily doses of up to 150-mg miltefosine (n = 47) or placebo (n = 26). Disease activity was assessed using the urticaria activity score. Safety and tolerability of miltefosine were also assessed.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of treatment, Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) levels were substantially more reduced in miltefosine-treated patients (-6.3 vs. -3.5 in placebo-treated patients; P = 0.05). Also, the number of weals, but not the intensity of pruritus, was significantly reduced in miltefosine-treated patients vs. placebo-treated patients (P = 0.02). In general, adverse events were frequent in both groups (miltefosine: 88%, placebo: 65% of patients) but mostly mild to moderate in severity. We did not observe any serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that miltefosine is an effective and safe treatment option for CSU patients who do not respond to standard-dosed antihistamines.

Evidence that deletion at FCGR3B is a risk factor for systemic sclerosis

There is increasing evidence that gene copy number (CN) variation influences clinical phenotype. The low-affinity Fc receptor 3B (FCGR3B) located in the FCGR gene cluster is a CN polymorphic gene involved in the recruitment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils to sites of inflammation and their activation. Given the genetic overlap between systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the strong evidence for FCGR3B CN in the pathology of SLE, we hypothesised that FCGR3B gene dosage influences susceptibility to SSc. We obtained FCGR3B deletion status in 777 European Caucasian cases and 1000 controls. There was an inverse relationship between FCGR3B CN and disease susceptibility. CN of ≤ 1 was a significant risk factor for SSc (OR=1.55 (1.13-2.14), P=0.007) relative to CN ≥ 2. Although requiring replication, these results suggest that impaired immune complex clearance arising from FCGR3B deficiency contributes to the pathology of SSc, and FCGR3B CN variation is a common risk factor for systemic autoimmunity.

Evidence of the contribution of the X chromosome to systemic sclerosis susceptibility: association with the functional IRAK1 196Phe/532Ser haplotype

OBJECTIVE

Several autoimmune disorders, including systemic sclerosis (SSc), are characterized by a strong sex bias. To date, it is not known whether genes on the sex chromosomes influence SSc susceptibility. Recently, an IRAK1 haplotype that contains the 196Phe functional variant (rs1059702), located on Xq28, was found to confer susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study was undertaken to test for an association between SSc and the IRAK1 SLE risk haplotype.

METHODS

We tested for an association with the IRAK1 SLE risk haplotype in a discovery set of 849 SSc patients and 625 controls. IRAK1 rs1059702 was further genotyped in a replication set, which included Caucasian women from Italy (493 SSc patients and 509 controls) and Germany (466 SSc patients and 1,083 controls).

RESULTS

An association between the IRAK1 haplotype and SSc was detected in the discovery set. In both the discovery and replication sets, the rs1059702 TT genotype was found to be associated with specific SSc subsets, highlighting a potential contribution to disease severity. A meta-analysis provided evidence of an association of both the T allele and TT genotype with the overall disease, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.20 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 1.06-1.35 for the T allele (P = 0.003) and an OR of 1.49 and 95% CI of 1.06-2.10 for the TT genotype (P = 0.023). However, the most notable associations were observed with the diffuse cutaneous, anti-topoisomerase I antibody positive, and SSc-related fibrosing alveolitis subsets (OR 2.35 [95% CI 1.51-3.66], P = 1.56 × 10(-4), OR 2.84 [95% CI 1.87-4.32], P = 1.07 × 10(-6), and OR 2.09 [95% CI 1.35-3.24], P = 9.05 × 10(-4), respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides the first evidence of an association between IRAK1 and SSc, demonstrating that a sex chromosome gene directly influences SSc susceptibility and its phenotypic heterogeneity.