Normal bone mineral density after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosed between 1991 and 1998

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether previous reports of reduced bone mineral density after management for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (chALL) were confirmed in a more recently treated cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study 75 subjects who were given the diagnosis of chALL between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1997 (69% standard, 31% high risk), at Denver Children's Hospital and who were 11 to 82 months post-diagnosis with no history of relapse, secondary malignancy, or transplant underwent whole body areal bone mineral densitometry (BMD(A) expressed as age- and sex-standardized z scores), a food frequency questionnaire, and a weight-bearing activity survey.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean whole body BMD(A) z score was normal (+0.22 +/- 0.96). A significant positive association was found with whole body BMD(A) z score and years elapsed since the beginning of maintenance (linear regression coefficient = +0.2 Deltaz score/year; 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.3) after adjustment was done for risk status/age category, history of cranial radiation, and total days hospitalized. No association was found with high risk/older age at diagnosis, nutrient intake, chemotherapy dosage, or weight-bearing activity.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to previous reports in which cranial radiation and longer hospitalizations were prominent components of therapy, our study suggests that more recently treated patients with chALL do not have persistent abnormalities of bone mineral density after completion of therapy.

Brain and other central nervous system tumors: rates, trends, and epidemiology

Reports that central nervous system (CNS) cancer rates are increasing have prompted debate on whether secular trends reflect environmental changes related to etiology or artifacts of case ascertainment. We present the most recent data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program on incidence rates and trends of CNS malignancies, including primary CNS lymphomas, and on survival probability. We discuss the new 2000 standard for adjusting rates; underreporting of CNS tumor rates resulting from the exclusion of nonmalignancies in most cancer registries; and information on CNS tumor risk factors, including concerns related to nonionizing electromagnetic fields and wireless mobile telephones.