Identifying homologous recombination deficiency in breast cancer: genomic instability score distributions differ among breast cancer subtypes

PURPOSE

A 3-biomarker homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score is a key component of a currently FDA-approved companion diagnostic assay to identify HRD in patients with ovarian cancer using a threshold score of ≥ 42, though recent studies have explored the utility of a lower threshold (GIS ≥ 33). The present study evaluated whether the ovarian cancer thresholds may also be appropriate for major breast cancer subtypes by comparing the genomic instability score (GIS) distributions of BRCA1/2-deficient estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER + BC) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Ovarian cancer and breast cancer (ER + BC and TNBC) tumors from ten study cohorts were sequenced to identify pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, and GIS was calculated using a previously described algorithm. Pathologic complete response (pCR) to platinum therapy was evaluated in a subset of TNBC samples. For TNBC, a threshold was set and threshold validity was assessed relative to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 560 ovarian cancer, 805 ER + BC, and 443 TNBC tumors were included. Compared to ovarian cancer, the GIS distribution of BRCA1/2-deficient samples was shifted lower for ER + BC (p = 0.015), but not TNBC (p = 0.35). In the subset of TNBC samples, univariable logistic regression models revealed that GIS status using thresholds of ≥ 42 and ≥ 33 were significant predictors of response to platinum therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the GIS thresholds used for ovarian cancer may also be appropriate for TNBC, but not ER + BC. GIS thresholds in TNBC were validated using clinical response data to platinum therapy.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency Landscape of Breast Cancers and Real-World Effectiveness of Poly ADP-Ribose Polymerase Inhibitors in Patients With Somatic BRCA1/2, Germline PALB2, or Homologous Recombination Deficiency Signature

PURPOSE

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant (hereafter mutation) in the BRCA1/2 genes (gBRCA); however, clinical benefit has also been demonstrated in mBC with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (sBRCA) or germline PALB2 mutations (gPALB2). This study aims to describe the genomic landscape of homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in mBC and assess PARPi treatment outcomes for patients with gBRCA compared with other HRR genes and by status of a novel homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig).

METHODS

A real-world (RW) clinico-genomic database (CGDB) of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) linked to deidentified, electronic health record-derived clinical data was used. CGP was analyzed for HRR genes and HRDsig. The CGDB enabled cohort characterization and outcomes analyses of 177 patients exposed to PARPi. RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) and RW overall survival (rwOS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 28,920 patients with mBC, gBRCA was detected in 3.4%, whereas the population with any BRCA alteration or gPALB2 increased to 9.5%. HRDsig+ represented 21% of patients with mBC. BRCA and gPALB2 had higher levels of biallelic loss and HRDsig+ than other HRR alterations. Outcomes on PARPi were assessed for 177 patients, and gBRCA and sBRCA/gPALB2 cohorts were similar: gBRCA versus sBRCA/gPALB2 rwPFS was 6.3 versus 5.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37 [0.77-2.43]); rwOS was 16.2 versus 21.2 months (HR, 1.45 [0.74-2.86]). Additionally, patients with HRDsig+ versus HRDsig- had longer rwPFS (6.3 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.62 [0.42-0.92]) and numerically longer rwOS (17.8 v 13.0 months; HR, 0.72 [0.46-1.14]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sBRCA and gPALB2 derive similar benefit from PARPi as those with gBRCA alterations. In combination, HRDsig+, sBRCA, and gPALB2 represent an additional 19% of mBC that can potentially benefit from PARPi. Randomized trials exploring a more inclusive biomarker such as HRDsig are warranted.

Association of HER2DX with pathological complete response and survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The HER2DX genomic test predicts pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Here, we evaluated the association of HER2DX scores with (i) pCR according to hormone receptor status and various treatment regimens, and (ii) survival outcome according to pCR status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven neoadjuvant cohorts with HER2DX and clinical individual patient data were evaluated (DAPHNe, GOM-HGUGM-2018-05, CALGB-40601, ISPY-2, BiOnHER, NEOHER and PAMELA). All patients were treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n = 765) in combination with pertuzumab (n = 328), lapatinib (n = 187) or without a second anti-HER2 drug (n = 250). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were available in a combined series of 268 patients (i.e. NEOHER and PAMELA) with a pCR (n = 118) and without a pCR (n = 150). Cox models were adjusted to evaluate whether HER2DX can identify patients with low or high risk beyond pCR status.

RESULTS

HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR in all patients [odds ratio (OR) per 10-unit increase = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.77; area under the ROC curve = 0.75], with or without dual HER2 blockade. A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to dual HER2 blockade over trastuzumab-only was observed in HER2DX pCR-high tumors treated with chemotherapy (OR = 2.36 (1.09-5.42). A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to multi-agent chemotherapy over a single taxane was observed in HER2DX pCR-medium tumors treated with dual HER2 blockade (OR = 3.11, 1.54-6.49). The pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-low tumors were ≤30.0% regardless of treatment administered. After adjusting by pCR status, patients identified as HER2DX low-risk had better EFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.006) compared with patients with HER2DX high-risk.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2DX pCR score and risk score might help identify ideal candidates to receive neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in combination with a single taxane in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer.

Retrospective Cohort Study on the Limitations of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Screening in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE

Among cancer predisposition genes, most direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests evaluate three Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) founder mutations in BRCA1/2, which represent a small proportion of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PLPV) in cancer predisposing genes. In this study, we investigate PLPV in BRCA1/2 and other cancer predisposition genes that are missed by testing only AJ founder BRCA1/2 mutations.

METHODS

Individuals were referred to genetic testing for personal diagnoses of breast and/or ovarian cancer (clinical cohort) or were self-referred (nonindication-based cohort). There were 348,692 participants in the clinical cohort and 7,636 participants in the nonindication-based cohort. Both cohorts were analyzed for BRCA1/2 AJ founder mutations. Full sequence analysis was done for PLPV in BRCA1/2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CHEK2 (truncating variants), EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2/6, NF1, PMS2, RAD51C/D, and 22 other genes.

RESULTS

BRCA1/2 AJ founder mutations accounted for 10.8% and 29.7% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in the clinical and nonindication-based cohorts, respectively. AJ founder mutations accounted for 89.9% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in those of full AJ descent, but only 69.6% of those of partial AJ descent. In total, 0.5% of all individuals had a BRCA1/2 AJ founder variant, while 7.7% had PLPV in a high-risk breast/ovarian cancer gene. For non-AJ individuals, limiting evaluation to the AJ founder BRCA1/2 mutations missed >90% of mutations in actionable cancer risk genes. Secondary analysis revealed a false-positive rate of 69% for PLPV outside of non-AJ BRCA 1/2 founder mutations.

CONCLUSION

DTC genetic testing misses >90% of BRCA1/2 PLPV in individuals of non-AJ ancestry and about 10% of BRCA1/2 PLPV among AJ individuals. There is a high false-positivity rate for non-AJ BRCA 1/2 PLPV with DTC genetic testing.

Assessment of the HER2DX Assay in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab

Importance

Patients with early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer (ERBB2+ BC) who experience a pathologic complete response (pCR) after receiving neoadjuvant therapy have favorable survival outcomes. Predicting the likelihood of pCR may help optimize neoadjuvant therapy.

Objective

To test the ability of the HER2DX assay to predict the likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC who are receiving deescalated neoadjuvant therapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this diagnostic/prognostic study, the HER2DX assay was administered on pretreatment tumor biopsy samples from patients enrolled in the single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase 2 DAPHNe clinical trial who had newly diagnosed stage II to III ERBB2+ BC that was treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Interventions and Exposures

The HER2DX assay is a classifier derived from gene expression and limited clinical features that provides 2 independent scores to predict prognosis and likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The assay was administered on baseline tumor samples from 80 of 97 patients (82.5%) in the DAPHNe trial.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary aim was to test the ability of the HER2DX pCR likelihood score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0).

Results

Of 80 participants, 79 (98.8%) were women and there were 4 African American (5.0%), 6 Asian (7.5%), 4 Hispanic (5.0%), and 66 White individuals (82.5%); the mean (range) age was 50.3 (26.0-78.0) years. The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P < .001). The pCR rates in the HER2DX high, medium, and low pCR score groups were 92.6%, 63.6%, and 29.0%, respectively (high vs low odds ratio, 30.6; P < .001). The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR independently of hormone receptor status, ERBB2 immunohistochemistry score, HER2DX ERBB2 expression score, and prediction analysis of microarray 50 ERBB2-enriched subtype. The correlation between the HER2DX pCR score and prognostic risk score was weak (Pearson coefficient, -0.12). Performance of the risk score could not be assessed due to lack of recurrence events.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this diagnostic/prognostic study suggest that the HER2DX pCR score assay could predict pCR following treatment with deescalated neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The HER2DX pCR score might guide therapeutic decisions by identifying patients who are candidates for deescalated or escalated approaches.

Adjuvant Olaparib for Germline BRCA Carriers With HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: Evidence and Controversies

In the OlympiA study, 1 year of adjuvant olaparib significantly extended invasive disease-free survival and overall survival. The benefit was consistent across subgroups, and this regimen is now recommended after chemotherapy for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCA1/2m) carriers with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer. However, the integration of olaparib in the landscape of agents currently available in the post(neo)adjuvant setting-ie, pembrolizumab, abemaciclib, and capecitabine-is challenging, as there are no data suggesting how to select, sequence, and/or combine these therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, it is unclear how to best identify additional patients who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib beyond the original OlympiA criteria. Since it is unlikely that new clinical trials will answer these questions, recommendations for clinical practice can be made through indirect evidence. In this article, we review available data that could help guide treatment decisions for gBRCA1/2m carriers with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab on Breast Tumor Downsizing for Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer: Single-Arm Prospective Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of abbreviated neoadjuvant regimens for HER2+ breast cancer on rates of breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear. We aimed to determine BCT rates in a single-arm prospective trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) in patients with stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

BCT eligibility was prospectively recorded before and after THP. Pre- and post-treatment mammogram and breast ultrasound were required; breast MRI was encouraged. Patients with a large tumor to breast size ratio were eligible for downsizing. Multifocal/multicentric tumors, extensive calcifications, and contraindications to radiation were considered BCT contraindications.

RESULTS

Overall, 92 patients who received neoadjuvant THP on trial were included. At presentation, 39 (42.4%) were considered eligible for BCT and 53 (57.6%) were not. BCT-eligible patients were older (median 54 years versus 47 years, respectively, p=0.006) and had smaller tumors by palpation (median 2.5 cm versus 3 cm, respectively, p=0.004). Of 53 BCT-ineligible patients, 28 were candidates for tumor downsizing, whereas 25 had contraindications to BCT. Overall, 51(55.4%) patients underwent BCT. Of the 28 patients who were candidates for downsizing, 22 (78.6%) became BCT-eligible after THP and 18/22 (81.8%) underwent BCT. In total, 44/92 (47.8%) patients experienced breast pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0), including 11/25 (44.0%) patients with BCT contraindications at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

De-escalated neoadjuvant systemic therapy led to high BCT rates in this cohort. The impact of de-escalated systemic therapy on local therapy and outcomes in early stage HER2+ breast cancer warrants further investigation.

The risks of cancer in older women with BRCA pathogenic variants: How far have we come?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative risks of all cancers in women from 50 to 75 years of age with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant.

METHODS

Participants were women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants from 85 centers in 16 countries. Women were eligible if they had no cancer before the age of 50 years. Participants completed a baseline questionnaire and follow-up questionnaires every 2 years. Women were followed from age 50 until a diagnosis of cancer, death, age 75, or last follow-up. The risk of all cancers combined from age 50 to 75 was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 2211 women included (1470 BRCA1 and 742 BRCA2). There were 379 cancers diagnosed in the cohort between 50 and 75 years. The actuarial risk of any cancer from age 50 to 75 was 49% for BRCA1 and 43% for BRCA2. Breast (n = 186) and ovarian (n = 45) were the most frequent cancers observed. For women who had both risk-reducing mastectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before age 50, the risk of developing any cancer between age 50 and 75 was 9%.

CONCLUSION

Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variant have a high risk of cancer between the ages of 50 and 75 years and should be counselled appropriately.

Mutational Signature 3 Detected from Clinical Panel Sequencing is Associated with Responses to Olaparib in Breast and Ovarian Cancers

PURPOSE

The identification of patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) beyond BRCA1/2 mutations is an urgent task, as they may benefit from PARP inhibitors. We have previously developed a method to detect mutational signature 3 (Sig3), termed SigMA, associated with HRD from clinical panel sequencing data, that is able to reliably detect HRD from the limited sequencing data derived from gene-focused panel sequencing.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We apply this method to patients from two independent datasets: (i) high-grade serous ovarian cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from a phase Ib trial of the PARP inhibitor olaparib in combination with the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120; NCT01623349), and (ii) TNBC patients who received neoadjuvant olaparib in the phase II PETREMAC trial (NCT02624973).

RESULTS

We find that Sig3 as detected by SigMA is positively associated with improved progression-free survival and objective responses. In addition, comparison of Sig3 detection in panel and exome-sequencing data from the same patient samples demonstrated highly concordant results and superior performance in comparison with the genomic instability score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses demonstrate that HRD can be detected reliably from panel-sequencing data that are obtained as part of routine clinical care, and that this approach can identify patients beyond those with germline BRCA1/2mut who might benefit from PARP inhibitors. Prospective clinical utility testing is warranted.

Uptake in genetic testing in patients with pancreatic cancer with oncologist-driven testing protocol

33

Background: The objective was to compare the uptake of genetic testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) seen at a single center (1) before the 2019 NCCN recommendation of universal screening for genetic mutations in all new PDAC diagnoses, (2) after this change in guideline, and (3) after transitioning to an oncologist-driven genetic testing protocol. Methods: A retrospective review of patient records seen for a new PDAC diagnosis at BIDMC between May 2018-May 2022 was performed. Patients were categorized into three groups by date of visit: pre-guideline change (5/2018-4/2019), post-guideline change (5/2019-12/ 2020), and after implementation of an oncologist-driven testing protocol (12/ 2020-5/2022). The primary outcome was the differences in rates of testing between each time period. Results: An increase in rates of genetic testing occurred between each successive time period. Pre-guideline change, 22% of patients had testing sent, and this increased to 32% post-guideline. With the oncologist-driven testing, this increased to 73%. There was an increase in referrals for genetic testing from the pre- to post-guideline change time periods (42% to 61%). However, in both groups, the number of patients who completed testing was approximately half of those who were referred (23% and 34%, respectively). Conclusions: Our cancer center moved to oncologist-driven testing to increase uptake in the wake of a guideline change recommending universal testing of all PDAC patients. By this protocol, germ-line testing is sent by the medical oncologist at the initial multidisciplinary clinic visit, rather than following a consultation with our genetic counseling team. With this change, there was a dramatic increase in genetic testing (32% to 73%), thereby capturing approximately 10 additional patients with actionable pathogenic variants. However, this change necessitated additional resources in the multidisciplinary clinic and time from the oncologist to consent for testing. In addition, the expertise of cancer genetics counselors was not provided to all patients. We attempted to address the latter via selective referral after positive results. Despite these trade-offs, oncologist-driven testing successfully met the goal of increasing our adherence with guideline-based genetic testing of all PDAC patients.[Table: see text]

Outcomes after treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy including taxanes and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use: findings from a multi-institutional retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Guidelines support comparable treatment for women diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) and nonpregnant women with limited case-specific modifications to ensure maternal-fetal safety. Experience during pregnancy with modern agents, such as taxanes or granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (GCSF), is limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified a multi-institutional cohort of PrBC between 1996 and 2020. Propensity score analyses with multiple imputation for missing variables were applied to determine the associations between chemotherapy exposures during pregnancy, with or without taxanes or GCSF, and a compound maternal-fetal outcome including spontaneous preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, chorioamnionitis, small for gestational age newborns, congenital malformation, or 5-min Apgar score < 7.

RESULTS

Among 139 PrBC pregnancies, 82 (59.0%) were exposed to chemotherapy, including 26 (31.7%) to taxane and 18 (22.0%) to GCSF. Chemotherapy use, in general, and inclusion of taxane and/or GCSF, specifically, increased over time. Pregnancies resulting in live singleton births (n = 123) and exposed to chemotherapy were as likely to reach term as those that were not (59.5% vs. 63.6%, respectively, p_unadjusted = 0.85). Among women treated with chemotherapy, propensity score-matched odds ratios (OR) for the composite maternal-fetal outcome were not significantly increased with taxane (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.27-5.72) or GCSF (OR 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-9.22) with similar effects in multiple imputation and sensitivity models.

CONCLUSION

The judicious increased use of taxane chemotherapy and/or growth factor support during pregnancy was not associated with unfavorable short-term maternal-fetal outcomes. While these findings are reassuring, case numbers remain limited and continued surveillance of these patients and progeny is warranted.

Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) whole-exome sequencing (WES) in the phase Ib/II trial of palbociclib and bazedoxifene reveals genomic dynamics and clonal evolution with the acquisition of treatment resistance in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+ HER2-), advanced breast cancer (ABC)

1058

Background: Patients (pts) with HR+ HER2- ABC ultimately develop endocrine resistance. To gain insights into the genetic mechanisms of resistance we performed WES on serial plasma samples from endocrine resistant pts treated on a clinical trial (NCT02448771). Methods: Plasma samples were collected at baseline (n=36), day 1 of cycle 2 (n=33), and at the end of treatment (EOT, n=33). Samples were subjected to ultra-low passage (ULP, 0.19-0.57X) WGS to determine ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) for the selection of samples (TF>0.03) for subsequent WES (193X). Somatic single nucleotide variations, somatic copy number alteration (SCNA), phylogeny, tumor mutational burden, mutational signatures, and germline analyses were performed. Results: All 102 samples underwent successful ULP and 68 WES. Overall, most frequent pathogenic mutations were in ESR1 and PIK3CA. At baseline, 32% of pts had ESR1 mutation and 21% PIK3CA mutation. There was no association between ESR1 mutations and PFS. In contrast, baseline PIK3CA mutations were detected only in pts who did not have a clinical benefit, and were associated with worse PFS compared to pts with wild-type PIK3CA (1.8 vs. 3.9 months, respectively, HR=0.2, 95% CI 0.06-0.6, P=0.0019, log-rank test). Additionally, pts with a baseline truncating mutation, mostly in tumor suppressor genes ( TP53, MEN1, RB1, CDKN1B, NF1, TP53BP1, TP63, SMAD2/4, ARID1A, KMT2C), also had a significantly worse PFS (1.7 vs 3.8 months, HR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7, P=0.006, log-rank test). At EOT, 20% (4/20) of pts with matched baseline samples had newly acquired mutations that are suggestive of mechanisms of acquired resistance and offer potential therapeutic targets (e.g. ERBB2, PIK3CA). SCNA analysis showed that in all pts there were at least 2 SCNAs in cancer-related driver genes, most common in CCND1 and ELF3. Moreover, in all samples we identified at least 1 SCNA related to a potential mechanism of resistance. To better understand tumor heterogeneity and sub-clonal architecture we performed an evolutionary analysis (sufficient TF≥0.15, available in n=7). Phylogenetic analysis revealed sub-clonal dynamics that could explain the acquisition of resistance in at least three pts (3/7), and identified novel genes which might have role in endocrine resistance (e.g. DCAF13, ZFHX3). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the feasibility and utility of serial WES in a clinical trial. Serial ctDNA WES and evolutionary studies enabled us to discover novel potential genomic mechanisms of tumor progression, and identified PIK3CA mutations as a candidate biomarker of resistance to the combination of palbociclib and bazedoxifene, which may apply to other next generation endocrine treatments. Clinical trial information: NCT02448771.

Exploring homologous recombination deficiency thresholds for predicting response to platinum-based treatment in triple negative breast cancer

525

Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status can be used to identify patients who are eligible for treatment with DNA damaging agents. Using a 3-biomarker Genomic Instability Score (GIS) threshold of ≥42, studies have previously examined the association between HRD status and outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, evidence suggests that a GIS threshold of ≥33 may be more appropriate. Here, we conducted an exploratory analysis evaluating the ability of ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC. Methods: Patients across 5 cohorts (TBCRC0301, TBCRC0082, NCT013725793, PrECOG 01054, combined cisplatin cohort4) were included in this analysis if they had a primary TNBC diagnosis, received neoadjuvant platinum-based treatment, had a valid GIS, and had known pathologic complete response (pCR) status. GIS was determined by a combination of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric-allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions.4,5 BRCA mutation status was defined by loss of function resulting from a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were calculated by comparing binary threshold status and binary pCR status. Results: A total of 204 tumors (158 BRCAwt; 33 BRCAm; 13 unknown) were included; pCR to platinum-based treatment occurred in 55 cases (39 BRCAwt; 14 BRCAm; 2 unknown). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were comparable between the ≥33 and ≥42 GIS thresholds, with the ≥33 threshold producing higher sensitivity values. This was true when thresholds were applied to all samples and to BRCAwt samples only (Table). Among patients who achieved pCR in response to platinum-based treatment, 5.5% of patients in the full cohort and 7.7% of those in the BRCAwt cohort had a GIS between 33-41. Conclusions: To ensure that the majority of patients likely to benefit from treatment are identified, a GIS of ≥33 may be the most appropriate threshold to predict response to platinum-based treatment in patients with TNBC; however, a prospective trial will be needed to confirm these findings. Additional studies will be important to determine whether this threshold may be appropriate to determine eligibility for other DNA-damaging agents such as PARP inhibitors. 1. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1518-25 2. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(1):31-7. 3. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151(3):629-38. 4. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(15):3764-73. 5. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;16(6):1-9. [Table: see text]

Phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with localized triple-negative breast cancer: Results from the NeoSTAR trial

512

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate in which the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) is linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the tumor antigen Trop2, is currently approved for treatment of patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We conducted a phase 2 study evaluating neoadjuvant (NA) SG as upfront therapy for pts with localized TNBC (NCT04230109). The primary objective was to assess pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) with SG. Secondary objectives included assessment of radiological response rate, evaluation of the safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5.0) and event-free survival (EFS). Methods: Patients with localized TNBC (tumor size ≥1cm, or any size if node positive) with no prior treatment were eligible. SG was administered IV on Days 1, 8 of each 21-day cycle at a starting dose of 10 mg/kg for 4 cycles. After 4 cycles, patients with biopsy-proven residual disease, considered as no pCR for primary endpoint, had the option to receive additional NA therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Radiologic response (US or MRI) was defined by RECIST version 1.1 using a composite response of CR & PR. Standard descriptive statistics were utilized, including 95% binomial confidence intervals for all rates estimated. Results: From 7/14/20 – 8/31/21, 50 pts were enrolled (median age = 48.5; 11 stage I disease, 24 stage II, 11 stage III, 4 unknown; 62% node negative). The majority (98%; n = 49) of pts completed 4 cycles of SG. Overall, the radiological response rate with SG alone was 62% (n = 31, 95% CI 48%, 77%). 26 pts proceeded directly to surgery after SG. Overall, the pCR rate with SG alone was 30% (n = 15/50, 95% CI 18%, 45%). The other 11 pts had RCB-1 (n = 3), RCB-2 (n = 5), and RCB-3 (n = 3) disease, respectively. Of the 24 pts who received additional NA therapy, 6 had a pCR (3 received anthracycline-based regimen, 2 carboplatin/taxane, and 1 docetaxel/cyclophosphamide). Among pts with a germline BRCA mutation (n = 8), 7 proceeded directly to surgery after SG and 6 had a pCR (86%, 95% CI 42%, 99%). The most common AEs with SG were nausea (82%, n = 41), fatigue (78%, n = 39), alopecia (76%, n = 38), neutropenia (58%, n = 29), anemia (36%, n = 18), and rash (48%, n = 24). 6% of pts required dose-reduction. No pts discontinued SG therapy due to disease progression or AEs; 1 discontinued due to minimal response per investigator preference. At the time of data cut-off (1/18/22), no pts experienced disease recurrence. Updated biomarker and EFS results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the first neoadjuvant trial in TNBC with an ADC, SG demonstrated single agent efficacy in localized TNBC. Further research on optimal duration of SG as well as NA combination strategies, including immunotherapy, are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT04230109.

Abstract P2-14-17: A phase 1b study of PVX-410 vaccine in combination with pembrolizumab in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

Background: Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibition is active in mTNBC. Both pembrolizumab and atezolizumab are FDA approved for programmed cell death ligand 1 positive (PDL1+) mTNBC. Vaccines may further induce host immune response and enhance therapeutic activity of checkpoint inhibitors. PVX-410 (PVX) (OncoPep, Inc.) is a novel, HLA-A2 restricted, tetra-peptide vaccine, with 3 of its 4 antigens (XBP1[2 splice variants] and CD138) commonly overexpressed in TNBC. We present results from a phase 1b study evaluating the immune response, safety and tolerability, and clinical activity of PVX and pembrolizumab (PEM) in mTNBC. Methods: Eligibility for this phase 1b multi-center, single-arm study included HLA-A2+, PD-L1 unselected female patients (pts) ≥18 years with metastatic or inoperable locally advanced TNBC, measurable disease, and any number of prior therapies, including prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Pts received 6 doses of 800µg PVX emulsified in Montanide ISA 720 VG by subcutaneous injection co-administered with intramuscular Hiltonol weekly for 6 weeks (wks) followed by booster vaccine doses at wks 10 and 28, with concurrent intravenous 200 mg PEM every 3 wks starting with the second PVX dose. Therapy was given until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of 24 months. Blood samples were scheduled for immune response assessment at baseline and at weeks 2, 5, 10, 28, and 52 post-treatment initiation. The primary objective was PVX- specific immune response at week 10. Immune response was defined as a ≥2-fold change over baseline in the proportion of CD3+CD8+ T cells that expressed IFNγ and the proportion of CD3+CD8+ T cells positive for PVX tetramers following an in vitro stimulation of PBMC with PVX peptides using a flow cytometric assay. Secondary objectives were immune response at wk 28, safety and tolerability, and clinical endpoints (RR, CBR, DCR, DoR, PFS, and OS). Results: Between 3/2018 and 8/2020, 19 pts enrolled. Median age was 62 yrs (range 46-79), with median 2 (range 0-9) lines of prior therapy for metastatic disease. Median disease-free interval among 16 pts with prior early TNBC was 3.3 years. Among 19 enrolled patients, 16 were available for analysis at the time of abstract submission. Among the 16, 10 pts were evaluable at week 10 and 7(70%) demonstrated a PVX specific immune response. There were 6 patients who progressed before week 10, of whom 3 (50%) had a positive immune response at the EOT visit. Immune response persisted in all evaluable pts assessed at week 28 (n=4). Immune response data for all evaluable patients will be updated at the presentation. Among 19 patients evaluable for safety analysis, the most common adverse events (AEs) attributable to PVX (grade ≥2) included: fatigue (21%), arthralgia (11%) injection site reaction (5 %) pain (5%) lymphocyte count decreased (5%), maculopapular rash (5%) and skin infection (5%) . There were two grade 3 AEs attributed to PEM (AST elevation, hyponatremia) and one grade 4 AE (ALT elevation). There were no grade 5 AEs. The clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD for ≥16 weeks) was 31.6% with no confirmed partial or complete responses. Best overall response was SD in 9 (47%) patients. Analysis of additional clinical endpoints including PFS and OS is ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: PVX plus PEM is safe with manageable toxicity in pts with mTNBC. No new unexpected adverse events were identified. Immune response data show PVX induces antigen-specific T cell expansion as observed by increases in PVX tetramer and IFN positive T cells. Clinical disease control was observed with a CBR of 31.6%. Based on these promising immune response results in this pretreated population, a phase 2 study with PVX+PEM in combination with standard chemotherapy in treatment naïve, PD-L1+ mTNBC is underway (NCT04634747).

Citation Format: Steven J Isakoff, Nadine M. Tung, Jun Yin, Nabihah Tayob, Joanne Parker, Julie Rosenberg, Aditya Bardia, Laura Spring, Hannah Park, Maya Collins, William T. Barry, Mariano Severgnini, Doris Peterkin, Sara M. Tolaney. A phase 1b study of PVX-410 vaccine in combination with pembrolizumab in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-17.

Abstract P3-18-05: Impact of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) on breast tumor downsizing for patients with HER2+ breast cancer - results from a single-arm clinical trial

Background: As abbreviated neoadjuvant regimens emerge for treating HER2+ breast cancer, it is important to examine the effect this may have on breast tumor downsizing. The DAPHNe trial was a single-arm prospective trial enrolling stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer patients for treatment with neoadjuvant THP. The primary outcome, feasibility of de-escalating adjuvant chemotherapy following pCR, has been previously reported. The goals of this study were 1) to report how many patients who were not initial BCT candidates because of tumor size were deemed candidates after the completion of therapy; 2) to identify characteristics associated with conversion to BCT; and 3) to report how many patients with contraindications to BCT had a pathologic complete response to THP. Methods: Surgeon assessment for BCT candidacy was prospectively recorded before and after THP. Pre- and post-treatment mammogram and breast ultrasound were required; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was strongly encouraged. The following variables were compared between patients who did and did not convert to BCT candidacy: gender, estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, intensity of HER2+ staining, tumor size by baseline physical exam/imaging, and clinical nodal status. Results: 97 patients received neoadjuvant THP. By pre-treatment surgeon assessment, 51 (52.6%) were not BCT candidates. Tumor downsizing was possible for 34/51 (66.7%) but 17/51 (33.3%) had absolute contraindications to BCT (Table 1). Among the 34 with potential for BCT, 23 (67.6%) became eligible and BCT was the final surgical procedure performed in 19/23 (82.6%). Baseline tumor size by MRI was significantly different between patients who converted to BCT candidacy vs those who did not (median tumor size 2.4cm [range 1.5-4.5] vs 5.5cm [range 2.3-6.4] respectively, p=0.002). Patients with ER-negative disease were numerically more likely to convert to BCT (10/11 [90.9%]) than ER-positive (13/23 [56.5%], p=0.06). Of 9 who could never convert to BCT due to multifocal/multicentric disease, 7 (77.8%) had ypT0 and 2 (22.2%) had ypTis disease. Of 6 who could never convert due to extensive calcifications, 1 (16.7%) had ypT0, 3 (50.0%) had ypTis, 1 (16.7%) had ypT1, and 1 (16.7%) had ypT2 disease. Of 2 with contraindications to radiation, 1 (50%) had ypT1 and 1 (50.0%) had ypT2 disease. Conclusions: Of patients with potential for BCT, 67.6% who were not upfront BCT candidates converted to BCT candidacy after THP. Smaller baseline tumor size by MRI was the only characteristic significantly related to BCT conversion in this relatively small cohort. Patients with ER-negative disease were numerically more likely to convert to BCT. There remains opportunity to improve prediction of ypT staging - several patients who had a contraindication to BCT had ypT0 disease, including most patients with multifocal/multicentric disease.

Table 1.Reasons for non-BCT candidacy at baselineCharacteristicN= 51Potential for tumor downsizing and BCTN=34Tumor to breast size ratio29 (56.9%)Nipple retraction2 (3.9%)Tumor location1 (2.0%)Unknown2 (3.9%)Contraindication to BCTN=17Multifocal/multicentric disease9 (17.6%)Extensive calcifications6 (11.8%)Contraindication to radiation2 (3.9%)

Citation Format: Anna Weiss, Tianyu Li, Neelam V. Desai, Nadine M. Tung, Nabihah Tayob, Tari A. King, Eric P. Winer, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Adrienne G. Waks. Impact of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) on breast tumor downsizing for patients with HER2+ breast cancer - results from a single-arm clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-05.

Abstract OT2-18-01: Harnessing olaparib, palbociclib, and endocrine therapy (HOPE): Phase I/II trial of olaparib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with BRCA1/2-associated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that occurs in the context of a germline or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutation has dual drivers: hormone receptor signaling and homologous recombination deficiency. The PALOMA-3 trial studied the selective estrogen receptor downregulator fulvestrant and the CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib in patients with HR+ MBC. Compared with fulvestrant and placebo, combination fulvestrant and palbociclib demonstrated significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. The OlympiAD trial examined patients with HER2-negative MBC and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation who were treated with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) olaparib or non-platinum chemotherapy. Olaparib resulted in improved PFS, double the response rate, and a lower risk of disease progression or death compared to chemotherapy. Despite these remarkable therapeutic advances, resistance to treatment inevitably develops and contributes to mortality in patients with MBC. Targeting dual therapeutic drivers concurrently may delay or circumvent resistance; however, olaparib and palbociclib have overlapping hematologic toxicity and the safety of combined olaparib, palbociclib and fulvestrant has not been determined. Methods: HOPE (NCT03685331) is a phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of olaparib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with HR+ MBC and a pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline or somatic variant in BRCA1/2. Eligible patients are biological males, postmenopausal females, or premenopausal females on ovarian suppression who have an ECOG performance status 0-1, measureable/evaluable breast cancer, any/no prior endocrine therapy, and 0-2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC. Prior platinum chemotherapy is allowed for curative intent treatment if completed at least 12 months prior to diagnosis of metastatic disease, or for MBC if there was no progression during therapy. Prior PARPi and prior CDK4/6i are permitted without restriction during phase I, and are permitted during phase II provided there was no progression on these therapies. Treatment (28-day cycles) consists of: olaparib 300mg by mouth twice daily continuously; fulvestrant 500mg intramuscularly on day 1 of each cycle and day 15 of the first cycle; and oral palbociclib once daily on days 1-21. For phase I, palbociclib dose is based on dosing cohort. Dose Levels (DL) are: DL 0 (starting level), 75mg; DL 1, 100mg; DL 2, 125mg. Phase I treatment begins with a 28-day safety run-in of fulvestrant and olaparib alone. For phase II, palbociclib will be dosed at MTD. Subjects will have archival tissue collection or fresh biopsy at baseline as well as research blood samples for cfDNA analysis at baseline, at progression, and at all scan timepoints (every 3 cycles). The phase I primary endpoint is determination of MTD. A 3+3 dose escalation design will be utilized with a 30% rate of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) deemed acceptable, and 6 patients treated at a dose for it to be declared MTD. This schema yields a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 18 patients on the phase I. For the phase II trial, the primary endpoint is PFS estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and secondary efficacy endpoints are objective response rate and 24-week clinical benefit rate. The phase II trial will evaluate 54 subjects to provide 80% power to detect an increase in PFS from 7 months with olaparib monotherapy to 10 months. Exploratory objectives include examination of baseline tissue for PARPi predictive biomarkers and measures of tumor immunogenicity as well as serial serum evaluation for reversion mutations. Enrollment has begun.

Citation Format: Alexandra Torres, Carey Kokkonen, Mary Oladeji, Kurt D'Andrea, Rosemarie Mick, Vivek Narayan, Michael Mallamaci, Gayle Ewing, Hayley Knollman, Nadine M. Tung, Mark Robson, Katherine L. Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Payal D. Shah. Harnessing olaparib, palbociclib, and endocrine therapy (HOPE): Phase I/II trial of olaparib, palbociclib and fulvestrant in patients with BRCA1/2-associated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-18-01.

Variation in Breast Cancer Risk Model Estimates Among Women in Their 40s Seen in Primary Care

Background: The Gail, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC), and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk prediction models are recommended for use in primary care. Calculating breast cancer risk is particularly important for women in their 40s when deciding on mammography, with some guidelines recommending screening for those with 5-year risk similar to women age 50 (≥1.1%). Yet, little is known about risk estimate agreement among models for these women. Materials and Methods: Four hundred nine Boston-area women 40-49 years of age completed a risk questionnaire before a primary care visit to compute their breast cancer risk. The kappa statistic was used to examine when (1) Gail and BCSC agreed on 5-year risk ≥1.1%; (2) Gail estimated 5-year risk ≥1.7% and Tyrer-Cuzick estimated 10-year risk ≥5% (guideline thresholds for recommending prevention medications); and when (3) Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick agreed on lifetime risk ≥20% (threshold for breast MRI using Tyrer-Cuzick). Results: Participant mean age was 44.1 years, 56.7% were non-Hispanic white, and 7.8% had a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Of 266 with breast density information to estimate both Gail and BCSC, the models agreed on 5-year risk being ≥1.1% for 36 women, kappa = 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.45). Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick estimates led to agreement about prevention medications for 8 women, kappa 0.41 (0.20-0.61), and models agreed on lifetime risk ≥20% for 3 women, kappa 0.08 (-0.01 to 0.16). Conclusions: There is weak agreement on breast cancer risk estimates generated by risk models recommended for primary care. Using different models may lead to different clinical recommendations for women in their 40s.

Alliance A011801 (compassHER2 RD): postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

This report describes the rationale, purpose and design of A011801 (CompassHER2 RD), an ongoing prospective, multicenter, Phase III randomized trial. Eligible patients in the United States (US) and Canada with high-risk (defined as ER-negative and/or node-positive) HER2-positive (HER2+) residual disease (RD) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 and placebo, versus T-DM1 and tucatinib. Patients have also received adjuvant radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, if indicated per standard of care guidelines. The primary objective of the trial is to determine if the invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1 plus tucatinib is superior to iDFS with T-DM1 plus placebo; other outcomes of interest include overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free survival (BCFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Correlative biomarker, quality of life (QoL) and pharmacokinetic (PK) end points are also evaluated.

Evaluation of TP53 Variants Detected on Peripheral Blood or Saliva Testing: Discerning Germline From Somatic TP53 Variants

PURPOSE

Multigene panel testing (MGPT) identifies TP53 pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in patients with diverse phenotypes, of which only one is classic Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Low variant allelic fraction (VAF) in TP53 found on germline testing may suggest aberrant clonal expansion or constitutional mosaicism. We evaluated TP53-positive probands seen in a cancer genetics program to determine germline versus somatic status.

METHODS

We reviewed TP53-positive probands from 2012 to 2019 identified by MGPT on blood or saliva (N = 84). Available VAFs were collected. Probands with a familial variant, who met Li-Fraumeni syndrome testing criteria or who carried a founder variant, were considered germline. For those with uncertain germline status, TP53 variants were further examined using ancillary data of family members and somatic tissue.

RESULTS

Of the 84 probands, 54.7% had germline variants with 33.3% meeting criteria for germline status and 21.4% confirmed through ancillary testing. Aberrant clonal expansion comprised 13.1% with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and 2.4% with a hematologic malignancy. Constitutional mosaicism was confirmed in 8.3% probands. Definitive status could not be determined in 3.6% despite ancillary assessment, and 17.9% did not have ancillary testing.

CONCLUSION

A TP53 P/LP variant found on peripheral blood or saliva MGPT does not always originate in the germline. In a clinical cancer genetics cohort, approximately half of the patients had TP53 P/LP germline variants; these patients plus those with constitutional mosaicism require intensified surveillance. A framework of multiple strategies enables discernment of germline from constitutional mosaic and acquired variants, which is essential for appropriate management.

Phase II trial of veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without BRCA1/2 mutations

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of poly-(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 inhibitor veliparib and temozolomide in metastatic breast cancer patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations.

METHODS

In this single-arm phase II trial, patients with metastatic breast cancer received veliparib 30 to 40 mg twice daily on days 1 to 7 with concurrent temozolomide 150 mg/m² on days 1 to 5 of a 28-day cycle. The primary cohort was unselected for BRCA mutation status, and an expansion cohort enrolled only BRCA1/2 carriers. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in each cohort. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and evaluation of safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

In the primary cohort of 41 unselected patients, which included 9 BRCA mutation carriers, the ORR was 10% and clinical benefit rate at 4 months (CBR) was 27%. In the expansion cohort of 21 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 14% and CBR was 43%. Among all 30 BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 23% versus 0% among non-carriers. In the subset of BRCA1/2 carriers, the ORR was 32% among platinum-naïve patients versus 9% among platinum-exposed patients. The median PFS was 3.3 months among BRCA1/2 carriers compared to 1.8 months among non-carriers (HR: 0.48, p = 0.006). A longer median PFS of 6.2 months was observed among BRCA1/2 carriers who had no prior platinum therapy. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (32%) and neutropenia (21%) that generally improved with dose modifications.

CONCLUSION

Veliparib and temozolomide demonstrated clinical activity in platinum-naïve BRCA-associated metastatic breast cancer with manageable toxicity at doses of veliparib well below the single-agent active dose. Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint in unselected nor BRCA-associated breast cancer, this regimen was further evaluated in the BROCADE 2 study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01009788 (ClinicalTrials.gov), November 9, 2009.

Adjuvant PARP Inhibitors in Patients With High-Risk Early-Stage HER2-Negative Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Mutations: ASCO Hereditary Breast Cancer Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options.

A phase II study of efficacy, toxicity, and the potential impact of genomic alterations on response to eribulin mesylate in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)+ metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

There are limited data on trastuzumab-pertuzumab (HP)-based treatments beyond the first-line, HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) setting. We conducted a phase II study of eribulin mesylate, which extends survival in MBC, with HP in patients with previously treated HER2+ MBC to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and genomic alterations driving therapeutic response.

METHODS

After a run-in phase for eribulin dosing, two cohorts were enrolled (Cohort A-no prior pertuzumab; Cohort B-prior pertuzumab). All patients received eribulin 1.4 mg/m² on days 1, 8 with standard-dose HP on day 1 (21-day cycles). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Genomic characterization via whole exome sequencing (WES) was completed on tumor DNA and matched germline DNA from 19 patients.

RESULTS

The six-patient run-in established a dose of eribulin 1.4 mg/m² with HP. Cohorts A and B enrolled 17 and 7 patients, respectively. Accrual stopped early due to an evolving treatment landscape and slow enrollment. The ORR was 26.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 9.2-51.2%) in Cohort A and 0% in Cohort B (95% CI 0-41.0%). WES revealed more frequent alterations in TP53 (p < 0.05, q > 0.05) in patients without clinical benefit (disease control for < 24 weeks) which was not significant after multiple hypothesis correction.

CONCLUSION

Eribulin-HP had manageable toxicity and modest clinical activity in patients without prior pertuzumab exposure. This study provides a preliminary landscape of somatic alterations in this patient cohort. Our data add to the literature on how genomic alterations may predict for therapy response/resistance, as we work to individualize choices in a quickly evolving HER2+ MBC treatment landscape.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01912963. Registered 24 July 2013.

Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) after adjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) compared to paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab (TH) (TBCRC033: ATEMPT Trial)

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) is a surrogate for ovarian toxicity and associated risk of infertility and premature menopause. Here, we compare CRA rate with paclitaxel (T)-trastuzumab (H) to that with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).

METHODS

Patients with T1N0 HER2 + early-stage breast cancer (eBC) enrolled on the ATEMPT trial and were randomized 3:1 to T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every (q) 3 weeks (w) × 17 vs. T 80 mg/m² with H IV qw × 12 (4 mg/kg load → 2 mg/kg), followed by H (6 mg/kg IV q3w × 13). Enrollees who self-reported as premenopausal were asked to complete menstrual surveys at baseline and every 6-12 months for 60 months. 18-month CRA (no periods reported during prior 6 months on 18-month survey) was the primary endpoint of this analysis.

RESULTS

Of 512 ATEMPT enrollees, 123 who began protocol therapy and answered baseline and at least one follow-up menstrual survey were premenopausal at enrollment. 76 had menstrual data available at 18 months without having received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or undergone hysterectomy and/or oophorectomy. Median age was 45 (range 23-53) among 18 who had received TH and 46 (range 34-54) among 58 who had received T-DM1. The 18-month rate of CRA was 50% after TH and 24% after T-DM1 (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Amenorrhea at 18 months was less likely in recipients of adjuvant T-DM1 than TH. Future studies are needed to understand how T-DM1 impacts risk of infertility and permanent menopause, and to assess amenorrhea rates when T-DM1 is administered after standard HER2-directed chemotherapy regimens.

Analysis of real-world (RW) data for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts) with somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA) or other homologous recombination (HR)-pathway gene mutations (muts) treated with PARP inhibitors (PARPi)

10512

Background: PARPi are approved for treatment of pts w/ HER2-negative mBC and germline BRCA1/2 (g BRCA) pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (muts); however, clinical benefit has also been demonstrated in mBC pts w/ sBRCA or other HR-pathway gene muts. Using a RW Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB), we assessed outcomes for pts w/ gBRCA muts compared to pts w/ either s BRCA or other HR-pathway muts treated w/ PARPi. Methods: 6,329 mBC pts from ̃280 US cancer clinics were included in the Flatiron Health (FH) -Foundation Medicine (FM) CGDB, which includes comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) linked to de-identified, electronic health record (EHR)-derived clinical data. Eligible pts had mBC, received care in the FH network from 1/1/2011-9/1/2020, and had tissue CGP by FM. Pts classified as gBRCA: positive germline result in EHR and BRCA mut predicted germline per FM’s somatic, germline, zygosity algorithm (SGZ) (Sun et al PMID 29415044). Non-g BRCA: negative germline results in EHR and a somatic BRCA (s BRCA) mut per SGZ or BRCA wild-type w/ another HR mut per CGP result. Pts w/o a documented gBRCA result in EHR, unknown FM BRCA SGZ result, or conflicting results were excluded. RW overall survival (rwOS) and RW progression-free survival (rwPFS) from start of PARPi for pts w/ gBRCA and non- gBRCA mBC were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression adjusted for mBC line number, prior platinum, age at PARPi initiation, race, and receptor status. Results: Among pts who received PARPi in the mBC setting, 44 had gBRCA and 18 had non -gBRCA: 9 s BRCA (5 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2), 4 PALB2, 2 ATM, and 1 each of ATM+CDK12, BARD1+FANCF+RAD54L, and CHEK2. Of HR muts 76% were confirmed biallelic: 33/44 gBRCA (11 unknown), 8/9 sBRCA, 3/4 PALB2, and 3/5 other (1 unknown). Neither median rwPFS nor rwOS from start of PARPi were significantly different between the non-g BRCA and g BRCA cohorts (rwPFS: 7.0 [4.6-11.3] vs 5.5 [4.3-7.2] months (mos), aHR: 1.19 [0.57 – 2.43]; rwOS: 15.0 [7.95-16.3] vs 11.5 [9.46-NA] mos, aHR: 0.85 [0.36-1.98]). For 9 pts w/ sBRCA mut, median rwPFS was 7.1 mos (range 1.4-12.4) and all pts had progressed by data cut off. Conclusions: Despite small pt numbers and limitations from RW data, our results suggest that pts w/ biallelic non-g BRCA mBC may derive similar benefit from PARPi when tumor CGP detects a s BRCA mut or germline or somatic mut in other HR-pathway genes. These findings are consistent w/ the results from TBCRC-048 (Tung et al PMID 33119476) and support further randomized trials exploring the efficacy of PARPi in this population.[Table: see text]

A011801 (CompassHER2 RD): Postneoadjuvant T-DM1 + tucatinib/placebo in patients with residual HER2-positive invasive breast cancer

TPS595

Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than pts with a pathologic complete response (pCR). Post neoadjuvant T-DM1 has improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes and recurrences in the central nervous system are a problem. More effective treatment strategies are needed. The CompassHER2 trials, EA1181 and A011801, leverage pCR to tailor post neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ EBC. EA1181 is a NAT de-escalation trial of a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) in clinical stage II-III HER2+ EBC; pts with a pCR complete HP +/- adjuvant radiation (RT) +/- endocrine therapy (ET). A011801 is an escalation trial for pts with high risk HER2+ RD after NAT, examining addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Pts. with high-risk HER2+ RD (e.g. ER-,node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1+ placebo (pb), vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of T and H +/- P. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (̃15-30% enrollees); these pts must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801. Pts who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is higher with addition of T-DM1 to tucatinib in pts with HER2+ EBC with RD after NAT; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in pts with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints will also be evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-),and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 pts; activation and completion dates are 01/6/21 and ̃ 01/2028. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Clinical trial information: NCT04457596.

Limitations of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

10515

Background: With the advent of DTC genetic testing, individuals have access to genetic testing without input from a healthcare professional. DTC testing now exists for the 3 Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) BRCA1/2 founder variants. DTC testing may provide false reassurance to individuals that they do not carry a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (PLPV) in BRCA1/2 or other cancer-risk genes. Methods: Multi-panel genetic testing was performed in 348,692 individuals for a clinical indication of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (Clinical cohort) and 7,636 self-referred ostensibly healthy individuals (Healthy cohort) by a clinical testing laboratory. The primary analysis evaluated PLPVs for Group 1 genes: BRCA1/2 AJ founder variants and Group 2: full sequence BRCA1/2. Secondary analyses assessed PLPVs in Group 3: high-risk breast cancer genes ( BRCA1/2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53), Group 4: all breast or ovarian cancer-risk genes (Group 3 genes plus ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, truncating CHEK2, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2/6, NF1, PMS2, RAD51C/D) and Group 5: 41 cancer-risk genes; these analyses were limited to participants who tested for all 41 genes. Potentially mosaic variants were excluded. Results: Table illustrates PLPVs found in both cohorts. The BRCA1/2 AJ founder variants account for only ̃11% (1513/13,987) and ̃30% (19/64) of the BRCA PLPVs in the Clinical and Healthy cohorts, respectively. Even among AJ individuals, testing only for the 3 founder variants will miss ̃10% (52/513) of all BRCA1/2 PLPVs. Evaluating only the BRCA AJ founder variants missed a higher percentage of PLPVs in other cancer-risk genes. Conclusions: The 3 BRCA1/2 AJ founder variants analyzed by DTC testing account for a small fraction of PLPVs in cancer-risk genes in the general population, and miss 10% of BRCA PLPVs even among AJ individuals. Greater public education is needed to dispel the misconception that DTC tests are equivalent to clinical assessment and comprehensive genetic testing. PLPVs identified in Clinical and Healthy Cohorts.[Table: see text]

Twenty-one-gene recurrence score (RS) in germline (g)CHEK2 mutation-associated versus sporadic breast cancers (BC): A multi-site case-control study

10531

Background: Genomic assays, such as RS, are used to determine chemotherapy benefit in early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, HER2 negative BC patients (pts). Currently, guidelines to use pts’ germline genetic testing results to guide adjuvant therapy are lacking. Several reports have indicated worse outcomes for BC pts with g CHEK2 pathogenic variants (PV). We investigated whether PV in CHEK2 were associated with increased RS. Methods: Patient-level clinical data and RS were derived from electronic medical records of seven medical centers between years 2013-17. Confirmation of RS using the Genomic Health provider portal was performed. 38 pts with germline PV in CHEK2 (15 pts/39.5% with c.1100delC mutation) and RS score (cases) were matched with BC pts whose genetic testing did not identify PV (controls) using a 1:2 matching schema. Pts were matched based on age at diagnosis and lymph node (LN) status. LN negative pts were further matched based on T-stage. A multivariate random intercept linear mixed model of CHEK2 mutation status on RS was performed, adjusting for PR. A secondary ordinal univariate analysis was conducted that categorized RS into low, intermediate and high risk ( < 18, 18-30, and > 30, respectively). P-values were reported based on a null hypothesis of no effect against a two-sided alternative. Results: The median RS for cases was 19.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 15 to 25) and the median RS for controls was 18 (IQR: 12 to 22). A greater proportion of cases were categorized as high risk (10.5%) compared to controls (5.6%), and a smaller proportion of cases were categorized as low risk (36.8%) compared to controls (49.3%). Cases had higher grade and increased proportion of PR-negative BC as compared with controls (grade 1: 12.1% of cases versus 32.4% of controls; PR-negative: 7.9% of cases versus 5.6% of controls). The variables used to match cases and controls (age, lymph node status, and T-stage) had similar summary statistics. The RS was 1.97-point higher in pts with g CHEK2 PV compared to controls, after adjusting for PR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-point lower to 4.96-point higher; p = 0.194). The secondary analysis of CHEK2 mutation status on an ordinal RS risk group yielded comparable results; on average, the odds of being high risk compared to the combined intermediate/low risk groups was 1.72 times higher in cases compared to controls (95% CI: 0.77 to 3.80; p = 0.181), but these differences were not significant. Conclusions: Our case-control study did not show a statistically higher RS for BC that develops in pts with g CHEK2 PV. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the association between type of CHEK2 PV (frameshift versus missense) and other modifying genetic variables and RS.

Updated Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: STEEP Version 2.0

PURPOSE

The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007, provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial end points. Given the evolution of breast cancer clinical trials and improvements in outcomes, a panel of experts reviewed the STEEP criteria to determine whether modifications are needed.

METHODS

We conducted systematic searches of ClinicalTrials.gov for adjuvant systemic and local-regional therapy trials for breast cancer to investigate if the primary end points reported met STEEP criteria. On the basis of common STEEP deviations, we performed a series of simulations to evaluate the effect of excluding non-breast cancer deaths and new nonbreast primary cancers from the invasive disease-free survival end point.

RESULTS

Among 11 phase III breast cancer trials with primary efficacy end points, three had primary end points that followed STEEP criteria, four used STEEP definitions but not the corresponding end point names, and four used end points that were not included in the original STEEP manuscript. Simulation modeling demonstrated that inclusion of second nonbreast primary cancer can increase the probability of incorrect inferences, can decrease power to detect clinically relevant efficacy effects, and may mask differences in recurrence rates, especially when recurrence rates are low.

CONCLUSION

We recommend an additional end point, invasive breast cancer-free survival, which includes all invasive disease-free survival events except second nonbreast primary cancers. This end point should be considered for trials in which the toxicities of agents are well-known and where the risk of second primary cancer is small. Additionally, we provide end point recommendations for local therapy trials, low-risk populations, noninferiority trials, and trials incorporating patient-reported outcomes.

Germline genetic testing in breast cancer: Rationale for the testing of all women diagnosed by the age of 60 years and for risk-based testing of those older than 60 years

Approximately 5% to 10% of women diagnosed with breast cancer will have a pathogenic variant (PV) in a hereditary cancer susceptibility gene, and this has significant implications for the management of these patients and their relatives. Despite the benefits of genetic testing, many eligible patients with breast cancer never undergo testing because of various barriers, including complicated testing criteria such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). In 2019, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) proposed germline genetic testing for all patients with breast cancer to increase the identification of PV carriers. In 2020, a Mayo Clinic study highlighted the limitations of these 2 genetic testing guidelines (NCCN and ASBrS) and proposed a hybrid approach of testing all women diagnosed with breast cancer by the age of 65 years and using NCCN criteria for older patients. This commentary presents an updated analysis of the Mayo Clinic data and discusses the rationale for using the age of 60 years rather than 65 years as the cutoff for this hybrid approach. Using an age at diagnosis of ≤60 or ≤65 years for the universal testing of patients with breast cancer detected more PVs (11.9% [16 of 134] and 15.7% [21 of 134], respectively) in comparison with using the NCCN criteria. Lowering the age for universal testing from 65 to 60 years maintained the sensitivity of detecting a PV at >90% while sparing testing for an additional 10% of women. Compared with the testing of all patients, the hybrid approach would allow 31% of all women with breast cancer to forgo testing and result in fewer variants of uncertain significance identified and, therefore, would decrease the chance of harm from misinterpretation of these variants.

TBCRC 048: Phase II Study of Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Mutations in Homologous Recombination-Related Genes

PURPOSE

Olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi), is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in germline (g)BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Olaparib Expanded, an investigator-initiated, phase II study, assessed olaparib response in patients with MBC with somatic (s)BRCA1/2 mutations or g/s mutations in homologous recombination (HR)-related genes other than BRCA1/2.

METHODS

Eligible patients had MBC with measurable disease and germline mutations in non-BRCA1/2 HR-related genes (cohort 1) or somatic mutations in these genes or BRCA1/2 (cohort 2). Prior PARPi, platinum-refractory disease, or progression on more than two chemotherapy regimens (metastatic setting) was not allowed. Patients received olaparib 300 mg orally twice a day until progression. A single-arm, two-stage design was used. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); the null hypothesis (≤ 5% ORR) would be rejected within each cohort if there were four or more responses in 27 patients. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients enrolled. Seventy-six percent had estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative disease. Eighty-seven percent had mutations in PALB2, sBRCA1/2, ATM, or CHEK2. In cohort 1, ORR was 33% (90% CI, 19% to 51%) and in cohort 2, 31% (90% CI, 15% to 49%). Confirmed responses were seen only with gPALB2 (ORR, 82%) and sBRCA1/2 (ORR, 50%) mutations. Median PFS was 13.3 months (90% CI, 12 months to not available/computable [NA]) for gPALB2 and 6.3 months (90% CI, 4.4 months to NA) for sBRCA1/2 mutation carriers. No responses were observed with ATM or CHEK2 mutations alone.

CONCLUSION

PARP inhibition is an effective treatment for patients with MBC and gPALB2 or sBRCA1/2 mutations, significantly expanding the population of patients with breast cancer likely to benefit from PARPi beyond gBRCA1/2 mutation carriers. These results emphasize the value of molecular characterization for treatment decisions in MBC.

Medical Management of newly diagnosed breast cancer in a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier

Germline BRCA1/2 mutations may be infrequent in unselected breast cancer population but are concentrated in those with triple-negative breast cancer or high-risk family history. Insight into the biology of BRCA mutation is now allowing a targeted therapeutic approach to these carriers with breast cancer. Functional BRCA genes play a critical role in DNA damage repair. Agents such as platinum salts and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit this vulnerability of impaired DNA damage repair mechanism in BRCA mutant cancers to leverage therapeutic benefit. Research has demonstrated improved response rates to platinum salts in BRCA-mutated compared with non-BRCA-mutated breast cancer, particularly in the metastatic setting. Additionally, clinical trials of single-agent PARP inhibitors have shown encouraging response rates and progression-free survival in patients with BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. In this review, we summarize the medical management of BRCA-associated breast cancer.

Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for management of patients with breast cancer (BC) with germline mutations in BC susceptibility genes.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature and a formal consensus process.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles met eligibility criteria and formed the evidentiary basis for the local therapy recommendations; six randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy met eligibility criteria.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed BC and BRCA1/2 mutations may be considered for breast-conserving therapy (BCT), with local control of the index cancer similar to that of noncarriers. The significant risk of a contralateral BC (CBC), especially in young women, and the higher risk of new cancers in the ipsilateral breast warrant discussion of bilateral mastectomy. Patients with mutations in moderate-risk genes should be offered BCT. For women with mutations in BRCA1/2 or moderate-penetrance genes who are eligible for mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy is a reasonable approach. There is no evidence of increased toxicity or CBC events from radiation exposure in BRCA1/2 carriers. Radiation therapy should not be withheld in ATM carriers. For patients with germline TP53 mutations, mastectomy is advised; radiation therapy is contraindicated except in those with significant risk of locoregional recurrence. Platinum agents are recommended versus taxanes to treat advanced BC in BRCA carriers. In the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting, data do not support the routine addition of platinum to anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) are preferable to nonplatinum single-agent chemotherapy for treatment of advanced BC in BRCA1/2 carriers. Data are insufficient to recommend PARP inhibitor use in the early setting or in moderate-penetrance carriers. Additional information available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

TBCRC 048: A phase II study of olaparib monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathway genes (Olaparib Expanded)

1002

Background: Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, is approved for HER2-negative MBC in g BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Olaparib Expanded, an investigator-initiated study, assessed the response to olaparib in MBC patients with sBRCA1/2 mutations or g/s mutations in DDR-pathway genes other than BRCA1/2. Methods: Eligibility included: MBC with measurable disease; progression on < 2 metastatic chemotherapy regimens. Prior PARP inhibitor or progression on platinum was not allowed. Cohort 1 included patients with germline mutations in non- BRCA1/2 DDR-pathway genes. In Cohort 2 were those with somatic mutations in these genes or BRCA1/2; germline testing was required only to exclude a gBRCA mutation if a s BRCA mutation was present. Patients received olaparib 300 mg bid until progression or unacceptable toxicity. For each cohort, a single-arm Simon two-stage design was used with 13 then 14 patients in the 1st and 2nd stages, respectively. The null hypothesis within each cohort [≤ 5% objective response rate (ORR)] would be rejected if > 4 responses were seen at the end of stage 2. Secondary endpoints include clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Results: 54 patients enrolled from March 2018 to Jan 2020; 1 ineligible s BRCA2 was excluded. Median age was 59 yrs (range: 30-87). 40 patients had ER+ HER2-, 3 HER2+, and 10 TNBC. 87% had a mutation in PALB2, s BRCA1/2, ATM or CHEK2. ORR was 29.6% (8/27, 90%-CI: 15.6%-47.1%) in Cohort 1 and 38.5% (10/26, 90%-CI: 22.5%-56.4%) in Cohort 2. Responses were gene specific (Table): g PALB2 and s BRCA mutations predicted response; no responses were seen with only a CHEK2 or ATM mutation. To date, responses as long as 16.4 months have been observed. Responses were seen in all subtypes: 5/10 TNBC, 1/3 HER2+, 12/40 ER+ HER2-. 11 responses occurred after prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. In June 2020, final data for confirmed ORR and secondary endpoints will be reported. Conclusion: In this proof-of-principle study, single-agent olaparib successfully met its primary endpoint in both cohorts. Activity was seen largely in patients with MBC and s BRCA1/2 or g PALB2 mutations but not with ATM or CHEK2 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03344965 . [Table: see text]

The BRCA founder outreach study: Initial results of a digital health model

2007

Background: NCCN now endorses BRCA founder mutation genetic testing (GT) via longitudinal studies in all Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) individuals. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study offers pre-GT online education with posttest engagement of primary care providers (PCPs). Methods: The study in 4 US cities enrolls those age > 25 with > 1 AJ grandparent. Participants enroll online with chatbot and video education, have GT at local centers, receive results from their PCP or BFOR staff, and are surveyed 12 weeks post disclosure and annually for 5 years. Univariate analyses and multivariable (MV) logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with not completing GT, selecting PCP to disclose GT, and positive GT. Results: As of January 2020, 4754 participants consented (77.5% female, median age 51); 37.7% never previously considered GT. Cancer family histories (FHx) were 56.4% low risk (LR), 36.4% high risk (HR), and 7.2% had a familial mutation (FM). To date, 3658 participants (76.9%) completed and 677 (14.2%) did not complete GT; the remainder are pending. Only 34.8% of participants selected PCP to disclose GT, and 42.6% of PCPs agreed. Of the 124 mutation carriers (3.4%) identified, 60.5% had a FM. At the 12-week survey, 65.4% of mutation carriers planned to proceed with recommended screening or scheduled risk reducing surgery; 3.5% of those with negative GT and HR FHx reported further GT. Satisfaction was high (mean 9.58/10, SD 1.12) and unrelated to result (p>.05). Conclusions: A digital model for founder mutation testing engaged those with LR FHx and no prior experience with GT. Older participants were more likely to complete the study. Males were less likely to enroll but more likely to carry mutations. The majority of those who tested positive had a FM. A minority of results were disclosed by PCPs. Continued follow up is needed to determine long term outcomes. [Table: see text]

Patterns of recurrence and metastasis in BRCA1/BRCA2-associated breast cancers

Background

Breast cancer subtypes are associated with distinct metastatic patterns. Whether germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status is independently associated with central nervous system (CNS) relapse, controlling for tumor subtype, is unknown.

Methods

Patients who were treated at Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute and diagnosed with a first locoregional recurrence (LRR) or metastasis between 1981 and 2014 were identified using 2 institutional registries: 1) patients treated for recurrent breast cancer and 2) patients who underwent BRCA testing. The frequencies of LRR, sites of metastasis, and breast cancer‐specific survival from LRR or metastasis were calculated, and the factors associated with CNS recurrence were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

The final study cohort included 30 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 32 BRCA2 mutation carriers, and 270 noncarriers. Most BRCA1 carriers (73%) had triple‐negative breast cancer; whereas most BRCA2 carriers (72%) had hormone receptor‐positive tumors. BRCA1 carriers frequently experienced lung and distant lymph node metastasis, whereas BRCA2 carriers and noncarriers most often experienced bone metastasis. Although CNS disease occurred frequently in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (53% BRCA1, 50% BRCA2, 25% noncarriers; P < .001), only BRCA2 mutation (P = .006) was significantly associated with CNS metastasis in multivariable analysis controlling for tumor subtype. BRCA2 mutation (P = .01), triple‐negative subtype (P < .001), and the involvement of CNS (P < .001) and other non‐CNS distant sites (relative to locoregional recurrence or contralateral disease; P < .001) at presentation of recurrent breast cancer were associated with risk for mortality.

Conclusions

CNS involvement is frequent in women with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations who have metastatic breast cancer. BRCA2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher frequency of CNS metastasis than noncarriers when controlling for breast cancer subtype.

Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations are associated with a high frequency (≥50%) of brain metastases in patients with locoregionally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. In multivariable analysis, only BRCA2 mutation (P = .006) was significantly associated with central nervous system metastasis when controlling for breast cancer subtype.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore-the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis

The introduction of next-generation sequencing has resulted in testing multiple genes simultaneously to identify inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer susceptibility genes. PVs with low minor allele frequencies (MAFs) (< 25-35%) are highlighted on germline genetic test reports. In this review, we focus on the challenges of interpreting PVs with low MAF in breast cancer patients undergoing germline testing and the implications for management.The clinical implications of a germline PV are substantial. For PV carriers in high-penetrance genes like BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, prophylactic mastectomy is often recommended and radiation therapy avoided when possible for those with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS). For germline PV carriers in more moderate-risk genes such as PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2, annual breast MRI is recommended and prophylactic mastectomies considered for those with significant family histories. Detection of PVs in cancer susceptibility genes can also lead to recommendations for other prophylactic surgeries (e.g., salpingo-oophorectomy) and increased surveillance for other cancers. Therefore, recognizing when a PV is somatic rather than germline and distinguishing somatic mosaicism from clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is essential. Mutational events that occur at a post-zygotic stage are somatic and will only be present in tissues derived from the mutated cell, characterizing classic mosaicism. Clonal hematopoiesis is a form of mosaicism restricted to the hematopoietic compartment.Among the genes in multi-gene panels used for germline testing of breast cancer patients, the detection of a PV with low MAF occurs most often in TP53, though has been reported in other breast cancer susceptibility genes. Distinguishing a germline TP53 PV (LFS) from a somatic PV (TP53 mosaicism or CH) has enormous implications for breast cancer patients and their relatives.We review how to evaluate a PV with low MAF. The identification of the PV in another tissue confirms mosaicism. Older age, exposure to chemotherapy, radiation, and tobacco are known risk factors for CH, as is the absence of a LFS-related cancer in the setting of a TP53 PV with low MAF. The ability to recognize and understand the implications of somatic PVs, including somatic mosaicism and CH, enables optimal personalized care of breast cancer patients.

Early results from the BRCA Founder Outreach (BFOR) Study: Population genetic screening using a medical model

1578

Background: Barriers to population screening for BRCA mutations include access, availability of counseling, and readiness of care providers to participate in this process. The BRCA Founder OutReach (BFOR) study evaluates a digital approach to genetic testing of a defined population using a medical model and risk-adapted follow-up. Methods: The BFOR study (Bforstudy.com) includes web-based enrollment open to individuals in four US cities who are age 25 or older and have at least one grandparent of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry. Participants receive web-based education, provide consent, complete questionnaires, and note their preference for receiving results either from their primary care provider (PCP) or BFOR staff. BRCA AJ founder mutation results are disclosed by (e)mail or phone, depending on need for additional counseling/genetic testing. Participants will be surveyed by email for up to 5 years; a subset of PCPs is also being surveyed. Results: From March 2018 to January 2019, 2562 participants enrolled: 78% female; < 30 years old, 8%; 30-50 years, 39%; > 50 years, 53%. At enrollment, 33% requested disclosure of results by PCP. Among 847 PCPs invited to disclose results, 45% accepted, 50% declined and 5% have yet to respond. 69 (3.2%) participants tested positive for a BRCA founder mutation, of whom 8 (12%) had no significant family history. 2087 participants tested negative, of whom 6% reported a known family mutation, 38% reported a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and 56% no such history. The most common reason for study participation was referral by a friend. One individual with a distant history of breast cancer tested positive for a BRCA2 mutation and underwent risk reducing surgery that identified an early stage fallopian tube carcinoma. Her daughter then tested positive and underwent prophylactic surgeries. Conclusions: Population screening of individuals at higher risk for cancer-predisposing mutations is feasible and identifies individuals who would not have been tested using clinical criteria. Preliminary findings reveal challenges for engaging PCPs and at-risk individuals, particularly men. Ongoing follow-up and a second phase of the study will address these barriers to testing. Clinical trial information: NCT03351803.

TBCRC 030: A randomized phase II study of preoperative cisplatin versus paclitaxel in TNBC—Evaluating the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) biomarker

507

Background: Cisplatin (C) and paclitaxel (T) have activity in TNBC, however predictive biomarkers are lacking. The HRD assay detects impaired dsDNA break repair and may identify BRCA1/2-proficient tumors for treatment with DNA targeting therapies. TBCRC 030 was designed to determine the association between HRD and response to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) in TNBC. Methods: This phase II study randomized patients (pts) with BRCA1/2-proficient/unknown stage I-III TNBC to 12 weeks (wks) of preoperative C or T, followed by surgery. HRD was performed on baseline tissue, with positive scores > 33. Non-responders at 12 wks could crossover to alternative CT. The co-primary objectives were to detect a positive association of HRD with pathologic response (RCB 0-1) vs not (RCB 2-3) to C and a negative association to T. Target accrual of 160 pts was planned to yield 140 evaluable specimens for HRD, providing 90% power for the primary objectives. Analyses used logistic models and likelihood ratio tests with one-sided Type I errors of alpha = 0.05. Results: 140 pts initiated treatment, (72 Arm C, 68 Arm T; 81% T1-2, 62% node negative); 138 were evaluable for response at 12 wks. Post-enrollment testing showed 8 pts (5.8%) with germline DNA-repair pathway mutations. HRD results were available for 95 pts (68.8%, 23 inadequate tissue, 22 pending); 68 (71.6%) were HRD positive: 38 in Arm C, 30 in Arm T. In response-evaluable pts, 87 (63.0%) had surgery at 12 wks, and 51 (37.0%) crossed over. Response outcomes are shown in the Table. No association was seen between HRD score and RCB response to either neoadjuvant C (OR 2.78, [CI 0.61, 17.74]) or T (OR 0.98, CI [0.20, 5.06]). There was no evidence of an interaction between HRD and CT arms. Similarly, no association was observed between HRD score and pCR to either C (OR 1.47, CI [0.40, 5.59]) or T (OR 0.61, CI [0.14, 2.52]). There were no new safety signals. Conclusions: In this mostly BRCA1/2 proficient TNBC cohort, 12 wks of preoperative C or T led to a similar response rate of about 40%; baseline HRD was not predictive of response to preoperative CT, defined either by RCB 0-1 or pCR. Further data will be presented. Correlative analyses of research tissues for markers predictive of response to specific CT in TNBC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01982448. [Table: see text]

International trends in the uptake of cancer risk reduction strategies in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

BACKGROUND

Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation face high risks of breast and ovarian cancer. In the current study, we report on uptake of cancer screening and risk-reduction options in a cohort of BRCA mutation carriers from ten countries over two time periods (1995 to 2008 and 2009 to 2017).

METHODS

Eligible subjects were identified from an international database of female BRCA mutation carriers and included women from 59 centres from ten countries. Subjects completed a questionnaire at the time of genetic testing, which included past use of cancer prevention options and screening tests. Biennial follow-up questionnaires were administered.

RESULTS

Six-thousand two-hundred and twenty-three women were followed for a mean of 7.5 years. The mean age at last follow-up was 52.1 years (27-96 years) and 42.3% of the women had a prior diagnosis of breast cancer. In all, 27.8% had a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy and  64.7% had a BSO. Screening with breast MRI increased from 70% before 2009 to 81% at or after 2009. There were significant differences in uptake of all options by country.

CONCLUSION

For women who received genetic testing more recently, uptake of prophylactic mastectomy and breast MRI is significantly higher than those who received genetic testing more than 10 years ago. However, uptake of both BSO and breast MRI is not optimal, and interventions to increase uptake are needed.

Abstract P1-17-02: Outcomes and safety of paclitaxel and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) in breast cancer in pregnancy (BCP) - A multi-institutional retrospective analysis

Background

BCP is uncommon; however, the frequency is increasing due to trends in delayed childbearing. Studies have suggested that some systemic therapies, including doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, can be delivered safely during pregnancy after the first trimester, whereas agents such as trastuzumab and endocrine therapy are contraindicated due to risk to the fetus. Data remain limited on the efficacy and safety of administering taxane chemotherapy or growth factor support during pregnancy. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of systemic therapies, including paclitaxel and GCSF, as well as clinical outcomes, in a multi-institutional cohort of patients (pts) with BCP.

Methods

Pts treated for BCP from 1996-2018 from 3 large academic institutions were included. Demographic, oncologic treatment, and obstetric/neonatal outcomes data were obtained from medical records. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier; Log-rank test were used to compare different groups/outcomes. Associations were calculated by Fisher's exact test.

Results

A total of 114 pts diagnosed with BCP were included. The median age was 35 years (range 25-44) and median gestational age at diagnosis was 18 weeks (range 2-38). BCP was predominantly early stage at diagnosis (stage I 28.0%, stage II 53.5%) and ER+/HER2- negative (48.2%). Sixty-three (55.2%) women received chemotherapy, 13 (11.4%) received paclitaxel and 11 (9.6%) GCSF (daily or depot injections) while pregnant. A total of 78% of pts with HER-2-positive BCP (28/36) received trastuzumab after delivery (11% were treated before 2005 and 5.5% were T1a). With median follow-up of 67.7 months, median DFS (stage I-III) was 212.8 months (CI 95% 108.4-317.1), and median OS (stage I-IV) was not reached. Subgroup analysis suggested a higher DFS for pts diagnosed in the 1sttrimester compared to the 3rdtrimester among women with stage II-III (HR 0.25 CI 95% 0.09-0.70, p= 0.03). Among women who received paclitaxel, there was no significant increase in adverse obstetrical/neonatal outcomes: preterm delivery (23.1% vs 13.1%, p 0.39), low weight newborn (7.7% vs 9.1 %, p 1.0), congenital malformations (0% vs 6.1%, p 1.0) or acute neonatal adverse outcomes (7.7% vs 4.0%, p 0.51), which include NICU need and Apgar 5'&lt;7, compared to pts who did not receive paclitaxel. Among pts who received GCSF during pregnancy, adverse outcomes were numerically but not statistically higher than women who did not receive growth factor: preterm delivery (36.3% vs 11.0%, p 0.051), low weight newborn (27.3% vs 6.9%, p 0.058), congenital malformations (9.1% vs 1.0%, p 0.18) or acute neonatal adverse outcomes (18.2% vs 3.0%, p 0.07).

Conclusion

In this multi-institution cohort of BCP pts, despite a small number of pts, exposure to contemporary therapies including paclitaxel was not associated with unfavorable obstetrical/neonatal outcomes and these results suggest it is safe to administer during pregnancy under the care of a multidisciplinary team. Although not statistically significant, GCSF presented numerical worse outcomes and combining data from several cohorts would be helpful to provide confirmation of these findings.

Citation Format: Exman P, Freret TS, Economy KE, Chen WY, Parsons HA, Lin NU, Moy B, Tung NM, Partridge AH, Mayer EL. Outcomes and safety of paclitaxel and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) in breast cancer in pregnancy (BCP) - A multi-institutional retrospective analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-02.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Lurbinectedin in BRCA-Mutated and Unselected Metastatic Advanced Breast Cancer and Biomarker Assessment Substudy

PURPOSE

This multicenter phase II trial evaluated lurbinectedin (PM01183), a selective inhibitor of active transcription of protein-coding genes, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A unicenter translational substudy assessed potential mechanisms of lurbinectedin resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two arms were evaluated according to germline BRCA1/2 status: BRCA1/2 mutated (arm A; n = 54) and unselected ( BRCA1/2 wild-type or unknown status; arm B; n = 35). Lurbinectedin starting dose was a 7-mg flat dose and later, 3.5 mg/m² in arm A. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The translational substudy of resistance mechanisms included exome sequencing (n = 13) and in vivo experiments with patient-derived xenografts (n = 11) from BRCA1/2-mutated tumors.

RESULTS

ORR was 41% (95% CI, 28% to 55%) in arm A and 9% (95% CI, 2% to 24%) in arm B. In arm A, median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 6.0 months), and median overall survival was 20.0 months (95% CI, 11.8 to 26.6 months). Patients with BRCA2 mutations showed an ORR of 61%, median progression-free survival of 5.9 months, and median overall survival of 26.6 months. The safety profile improved with lurbinectedin dose adjustment to body surface area. The most common nonhematologic adverse events seen at 3.5 mg/m² were nausea (74%; grade 3, 5%) and fatigue (74%; grade 3, 21%). Neutropenia was the most common severe hematologic adverse event (grade 3, 47%; grade 4, 10%). Exome sequencing showed mutations in genes related to the nucleotide excision repair pathway in four of seven tumors at primary or acquired resistance and in one patient with short-term stable disease. In vivo, sensitivity to cisplatin and lurbinectedin was evidenced in lurbinectedin-resistant (one of two) and cisplatin-resistant (two of three) patient-derived xenografts.

CONCLUSION

Lurbinectedin showed noteworthy activity in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. Response and survival was notable in those with BRCA2 mutations. Additional clinical development in this subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer is warranted.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Lurbinectedin in BRCA-Mutated and Unselected Metastatic Advanced Breast Cancer and Biomarker Assessment Substudy

Purpose

This multicenter phase II trial evaluated lurbinectedin (PM01183), a selective inhibitor of active transcription of protein-coding genes, in patients with metastatic breast cancer. A unicenter translational substudy assessed potential mechanisms of lurbinectedin resistance.

Patients and Methods

Two arms were evaluated according to germline BRCA1/2 status: BRCA1/2 mutated (arm A; n = 54) and unselected (BRCA1/2 wild-type or unknown status; arm B; n = 35). Lurbinectedin starting dose was a 7-mg flat dose and later, 3.5 mg/m² in arm A. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The translational substudy of resistance mechanisms included exome sequencing (n = 13) and in vivo experiments with patient-derived xenografts (n = 11) from BRCA1/2-mutated tumors.

Results

ORR was 41% (95% CI, 28% to 55%) in arm A and 9% (95% CI, 2% to 24%) in arm B. In arm A, median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.0 to 6.0 months), and median overall survival was 20.0 months (95% CI, 11.8 to 26.6 months). Patients with BRCA2 mutations showed an ORR of 61%, median progression-free survival of 5.9 months, and median overall survival of 26.6 months. The safety profile improved with lurbinectedin dose adjustment to body surface area. The most common nonhematologic adverse events seen at 3.5 mg/m² were nausea (74%; grade 3, 5%) and fatigue (74%; grade 3, 21%). Neutropenia was the most common severe hematologic adverse event (grade 3, 47%; grade 4, 10%). Exome sequencing showed mutations in genes related to the nucleotide excision repair pathway in four of seven tumors at primary or acquired resistance and in one patient with short-term stable disease. In vivo, sensitivity to cisplatin and lurbinectedin was evidenced in lurbinectedin-resistant (one of two) and cisplatin-resistant (two of three) patient-derived xenografts.

Conclusion

Lurbinectedin showed noteworthy activity in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations. Response and survival was notable in those with BRCA2 mutations. Additional clinical development in this subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer is warranted.