1
|
Renton AI, Dao TT, Johnstone T, Civier O, Sullivan RP, White DJ, Lyons P, Slade BM, Abbott DF, Amos TJ, Bollmann S, Botting A, Campbell MEJ, Chang J, Close TG, Dörig M, Eckstein K, Egan GF, Evas S, Flandin G, Garner KG, Garrido MI, Ghosh SS, Grignard M, Halchenko YO, Hannan AJ, Heinsfeld AS, Huber L, Hughes ME, Kaczmarzyk JR, Kasper L, Kuhlmann L, Lou K, Mantilla-Ramos YJ, Mattingley JB, Meier ML, Morris J, Narayanan A, Pestilli F, Puce A, Ribeiro FL, Rogasch NC, Rorden C, Schira MM, Shaw TB, Sowman PF, Spitz G, Stewart AW, Ye X, Zhu JD, Narayanan A, Bollmann S. Neurodesk: an accessible, flexible and portable data analysis environment for reproducible neuroimaging. Nat Methods 2024; 21:804-808. [PMID: 38191935 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02145-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Neuroimaging research requires purpose-built analysis software, which is challenging to install and may produce different results across computing environments. The community-oriented, open-source Neurodesk platform ( https://www.neurodesk.org/ ) harnesses a comprehensive and growing suite of neuroimaging software containers. Neurodesk includes a browser-accessible virtual desktop, command-line interface and computational notebook compatibility, allowing for accessible, flexible, portable and fully reproducible neuroimaging analysis on personal workstations, high-performance computers and the cloud.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela I Renton
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Thuy T Dao
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tom Johnstone
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Oren Civier
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ryan P Sullivan
- The University of Sydney, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J White
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paris Lyons
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin M Slade
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - David F Abbott
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Toluwani J Amos
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu, China
| | - Saskia Bollmann
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andy Botting
- Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan E J Campbell
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute Imaging Centre, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeryn Chang
- The University of Queensland, School of Biomedical Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Thomas G Close
- The University of Sydney, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Monika Dörig
- Integrative Spinal Research, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Korbinian Eckstein
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gary F Egan
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanie Evas
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Human Health, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Guillaume Flandin
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kelly G Garner
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Psychology, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Marta I Garrido
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, he University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Graeme Clark Institute for Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Satrajit S Ghosh
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin Grignard
- GIGA CRC In-Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Yaroslav O Halchenko
- Center for Open Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Anthony J Hannan
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anibal S Heinsfeld
- Department of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, Center For Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Laurentius Huber
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew E Hughes
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jakub R Kaczmarzyk
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, New York, NY, USA
- Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lars Kasper
- BRAIN-TO Lab, Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Translational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Levin Kuhlmann
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kexin Lou
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yorguin-Jose Mantilla-Ramos
- Grupo Neuropsicología y Conducta (GRUNECO), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Jason B Mattingley
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Psychology, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael L Meier
- Integrative Spinal Research, Department of Chiropractic Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jo Morris
- Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Akshaiy Narayanan
- School of Computer Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Franco Pestilli
- Department of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Institute for Neuroscience, Center For Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Aina Puce
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Fernanda L Ribeiro
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Chris Rorden
- McCausland Center for Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Mark M Schira
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas B Shaw
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul F Sowman
- Macquarie University, School of Psychological Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashley W Stewart
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- ARC Training Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Xincheng Ye
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judy D Zhu
- Macquarie University, School of Psychological Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Aswin Narayanan
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Steffen Bollmann
- The University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- ARC Training Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-22. [PMID: 37828899 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aphasia is an acquired language impairment that commonly results from stroke. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) might accelerate aphasia recovery trajectories and has seen mounting popularity in recent aphasia rehabilitation research. The present review aimed to: (1) summarise all existing literature on NIBS as a post-stroke aphasia treatment; and (2) provide recommendations for future NIBS-aphasia research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Databases for published and grey literature were searched using scoping review methodology. 278 journal articles, conference abstracts/posters, and books, and 38 items of grey literature, were included for analysis. RESULTS Quantitative analysis revealed that ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and contralesional 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation were the most widely used forms of NIBS, while qualitative analysis identified four key themes including: the roles of the hemispheres in aphasia recovery and their relationship with NIBS; heterogeneity of individuals but homogeneity of subpopulations; individualisation of stimulation parameters; and much remains under-explored in the NIBS-aphasia literature. CONCLUSIONS Taken together, these results highlighted systemic challenges across the field such as small sample sizes, inter-individual variability, lack of protocol optimisation/standardisation, and inadequate focus on aphasiology. Four key recommendations are outlined herein to guide future research and refine NIBS methods for post-stroke aphasia treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen E R Williams
- School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sabrina Sghirripa
- School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
- Turner Institute of Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brenton Hordacre
- Innovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Stacie Attrill
- Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health Science and Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Renton AI, Dao TT, Johnstone T, Civier O, Sullivan RP, White DJ, Lyons P, Slade BM, Abbott DF, Amos TJ, Bollmann S, Botting A, Campbell MEJ, Chang J, Close TG, Eckstein K, Egan GF, Evas S, Flandin G, Garner KG, Garrido MI, Ghosh SS, Grignard M, Hannan AJ, Huber R, Kaczmarzyk JR, Kasper L, Kuhlmann L, Lou K, Mantilla-Ramos YJ, Mattingley JB, Morris J, Narayanan A, Pestilli F, Puce A, Ribeiro FL, Rogasch NC, Rorden C, Schira M, Shaw TB, Sowman PF, Spitz G, Stewart A, Ye X, Zhu JD, Hughes ME, Narayanan A, Bollmann S. Neurodesk: An accessible, flexible, and portable data analysis environment for reproducible neuroimaging. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-2649734. [PMID: 36993557 PMCID: PMC10055538 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2649734/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Neuroimaging data analysis often requires purpose-built software, which can be challenging to install and may produce different results across computing environments. Beyond being a roadblock to neuroscientists, these issues of accessibility and portability can hamper the reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis pipelines. Here, we introduce the Neurodesk platform, which harnesses software containers to support a comprehensive and growing suite of neuroimaging software (https://www.neurodesk.org/). Neurodesk includes a browser-accessible virtual desktop environment and a command line interface, mediating access to containerized neuroimaging software libraries on various computing platforms, including personal and high-performance computers, cloud computing and Jupyter Notebooks. This community-oriented, open-source platform enables a paradigm shift for neuroimaging data analysis, allowing for accessible, flexible, fully reproducible, and portable data analysis pipelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela I. Renton
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia 4072, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Thuy T. Dao
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Tom Johnstone
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - Oren Civier
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - Ryan P. Sullivan
- The University of Sydney, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sydney, Australia
| | - David J. White
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - Paris Lyons
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - Benjamin M. Slade
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - David F. Abbott
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Toluwani J. Amos
- School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology, China
| | - Saskia Bollmann
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Andy Botting
- Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Australia
| | - Megan E. J. Campbell
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute Imaging Centre, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Jeryn Chang
- The University of Queensland, School of Biomedical Sciences, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Thomas G. Close
- The University of Sydney, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sydney, Australia
| | - Korbinian Eckstein
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Gary F. Egan
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stefanie Evas
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
- Human Health, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, 5000, Australia
| | - Guillaume Flandin
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kelly G. Garner
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia 4072, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Psychology, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Marta I. Garrido
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne
- Graeme Clark Institute for Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne
| | - Satrajit S. Ghosh
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin Grignard
- GIGA CRC In-Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Anthony J. Hannan
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Renzo Huber
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Core Facility (FMRIF), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), USA
| | - Jakub R. Kaczmarzyk
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America
- Simons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States of America
| | - Lars Kasper
- Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Levin Kuhlmann
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Kexin Lou
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | | | - Jason B. Mattingley
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia 4072, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Psychology, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Jo Morris
- Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Australia
| | | | - Franco Pestilli
- Department of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, Center for Theoretical and Computational Neuroscience, Center on Aging and Population Sciences, Center for Learning and Memory, The University of Texas at Austin, 108 E Dean Keeton St, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | - Aina Puce
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
| | - Fernanda L. Ribeiro
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Nigel C. Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris Rorden
- McCausland Center for Brain Imaging, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia SC, 29208, USA
| | - Mark Schira
- School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, 2522, Australia
| | - Thomas B. Shaw
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, St Lucia 4072, Australia
- Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul F. Sowman
- Macquarie University, School of Psychological Sciences, North Ryde 2112, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168, Australia
| | - Ashley Stewart
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Xincheng Ye
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Judy D. Zhu
- Macquarie University, School of Psychological Sciences, North Ryde 2112, Australia
| | - Matthew E. Hughes
- Centre for Mental Health & Brain Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
| | - Aswin Narayanan
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Advanced Imaging, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| | - Steffen Bollmann
- The University of Queensland, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, St Lucia 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hernandez-Pavon JC, Veniero D, Bergmann TO, Belardinelli P, Bortoletto M, Casarotto S, Casula EP, Farzan F, Fecchio M, Julkunen P, Kallioniemi E, Lioumis P, Metsomaa J, Miniussi C, Mutanen TP, Rocchi L, Rogasch NC, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Thut G, Zrenner C, Ziemann U, Ilmoniemi RJ. TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:567-593. [PMID: 36828303 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes neuronal activity in the targeted cortex and connected brain regions. The evoked brain response can be measured with electroencephalography (EEG). TMS combined with simultaneous EEG (TMS-EEG) is widely used for studying cortical reactivity and connectivity at high spatiotemporal resolution. Methodologically, the combination of TMS with EEG is challenging, and there are many open questions in the field. Different TMS-EEG equipment and approaches for data collection and analysis are used. The lack of standardization may affect reproducibility and limit the comparability of results produced in different research laboratories. In addition, there is controversy about the extent to which auditory and somatosensory inputs contribute to transcranially evoked EEG. This review provides a guide for researchers who wish to use TMS-EEG to study the reactivity of the human cortex. A worldwide panel of experts working on TMS-EEG covered all aspects that should be considered in TMS-EEG experiments, providing methodological recommendations (when possible) for effective TMS-EEG recordings and analysis. The panel identified and discussed the challenges of the technique, particularly regarding recording procedures, artifact correction, analysis, and interpretation of the transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs). Therefore, this work offers an extensive overview of TMS-EEG methodology and thus may promote standardization of experimental and computational procedures across groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio C Hernandez-Pavon
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Brain Stimulation, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Paolo Belardinelli
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy; Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marta Bortoletto
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Casarotto
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elias P Casula
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Faranak Farzan
- Simon Fraser University, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matteo Fecchio
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Petro Julkunen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Elisa Kallioniemi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Pantelis Lioumis
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Metsomaa
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy
| | - Tuomas P Mutanen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mouhsin M Shafi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gregor Thut
- School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Zrenner
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson MT, Goldsworthy MR, Vallence AM, Fornito A, Rogasch NC. Finding synaptic couplings from a biophysical model of motor evoked potentials after theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res 2023; 1801:148205. [PMID: 36563834 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to use measured input-output (IO) data to identify the best fitting model for motor evoked potentials. METHODS We analyzed existing IO data before and after intermittent and continuous theta-burst stimulation (iTBS & cTBS) from a small group of subjects (18 for each). We fitted individual synaptic couplings and sensitivity parameters using variations of a biophysical model. A best performing model was selected and analyzed. RESULTS cTBS gives a broad reduction in MEPs for amplitudes larger than resting motor threshold (RMT). Close to threshold, iTBS gives strong potentiation. The model captures individual IO curves. There is no change to the population average synaptic weights post TBS but the change in excitatory-to-excitatory synaptic coupling is strongly correlated with the experimental post-TBS response relative to baseline. CONCLUSIONS The model describes population-averaged and individual IO curves, and their post-TBS change. Variation among individuals is accounted for with variation in synaptic couplings, and variation in sensitivity of neural response to stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE The best fitting model could be applied more broadly and validation studies could elucidate underlying biophysical meaning of parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus T Wilson
- Te Aka Mātuatua-School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
| | - Mitchell R Goldsworthy
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology Group, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia; Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ann-Maree Vallence
- Discipline of Psychology, College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia; Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bailey NW, Hill AT, Biabani M, Murphy OW, Rogasch NC, McQueen B, Miljevic A, Fitzgerald PB. RELAX part 2: A fully automated EEG data cleaning algorithm that is applicable to Event-Related-Potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 149:202-222. [PMID: 36822996 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electroencephalography (EEG) is often used to examine neural activity time-locked to stimuli presentation, referred to as Event-Related Potentials (ERP). However, EEG is influenced by non-neural artifacts, which can confound ERP comparisons. Artifact cleaning reduces artifacts, but often requires time-consuming manual decisions. Most automated methods filter frequencies <1 Hz out of the data, so are not recommended for ERPs (which contain frequencies <1 Hz). Our aim was to test the RELAX (Reduction of Electroencephalographic Artifacts) pre-processing pipeline for use on ERP data. METHODS The cleaning performance of multiple versions of RELAX were compared to four commonly used EEG cleaning pipelines across both artifact cleaning metrics and the amount of variance in ERPs explained by different conditions in a Go-Nogo task. Results RELAX with Multi-channel Wiener Filtering (MWF) and wavelet-enhanced independent component analysis applied to artifacts identified with ICLabel (wICA_ICLabel) cleaned data most effectively and produced amongst the most dependable ERP estimates. RELAX with wICA_ICLabel only or MWF_only may detect effects better for some ERPs. CONCLUSIONS RELAX shows high artifact cleaning performance even when data is high-pass filtered at 0.25 Hz (applicable to ERP analyses). SIGNIFICANCE RELAX is easy to implement via EEGLAB in MATLAB and freely available on GitHub. Given its performance and objectivity we recommend RELAX to improve artifact cleaning and consistency across ERP research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N W Bailey
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Monarch Research Institute Monarch Mental Health Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - A T Hill
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - M Biabani
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - O W Murphy
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
| | - N C Rogasch
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia; Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - B McQueen
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - A Miljevic
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - P B Fitzgerald
- Central Clinical School Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, Camberwell, VIC, Australia; School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia; Monarch Research Institute Monarch Mental Health Group, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Todd G, Rae CD, Taylor JL, Rogasch NC, Butler JE, Hayes M, Wilcox RA, Gandevia SC, Aoun K, Esterman A, Lewis SJG, Hall JM, Matar E, Godau J, Berg D, Plewnia C, von Thaler A, Chiang C, Double KL. Motor cortical excitability and pre-supplementary motor area neurochemistry in healthy adults with substantia nigra hyperechogenicity. J Neurosci Res 2023; 101:263-277. [PMID: 36353842 PMCID: PMC10952673 DOI: 10.1002/jnr.25145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Substantia nigra (SN) hyperechogenicity, viewed with transcranial ultrasound, is a risk marker for Parkinson's disease. We hypothesized that SN hyperechogenicity in healthy adults aged 50-70 years is associated with reduced short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex, and that the reduced intracortical inhibition is associated with neurochemical markers of activity in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA). Short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in primary motor cortex was assessed with paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in 23 healthy adults with normal (n = 14; 61 ± 7 yrs) or abnormally enlarged (hyperechogenic; n = 9; 60 ± 6 yrs) area of SN echogenicity. Thirteen of these participants (7 SN- and 6 SN+) also underwent brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy to investigate pre-SMA neurochemistry. There was no relationship between area of SN echogenicity and short-interval intracortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex. There was a significant positive relationship, however, between area of echogenicity in the right SN and the magnitude of intracortical facilitation in the right (ipsilateral) primary motor cortex (p = .005; multivariate regression), evidenced by the amplitude of the conditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) at the 10-12 ms interstimulus interval. This relationship was not present on the left side. Pre-SMA glutamate did not predict primary motor cortex inhibition or facilitation. The results suggest that SN hyperechogenicity in healthy older adults may be associated with changes in excitability of motor cortical circuitry. The results advance understanding of brain changes in healthy older adults at risk of Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Todd
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences and Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA)University of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Caroline D. Rae
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Janet L. Taylor
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Medical and Health SciencesEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Nigel C. Rogasch
- Hopwood Centre for NeurobiologySouth Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Faculty of Health and Medical SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental HealthMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Jane E. Butler
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael Hayes
- Department of NeurologyConcord Repatriation General HospitalConcordNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Robert A. Wilcox
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences and Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA)University of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Department of NeurologyFlinders Medical CentreBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
- College of Medicine and Public HealthFlinders UniversityBedford ParkSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Simon C. Gandevia
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Karl Aoun
- Brain and Mind Centre and School of Medical Sciences (Neuroscience)The University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Adrian Esterman
- UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences and Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA)University of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Simon J. G. Lewis
- ForeFront Parkinson's Disease Research Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Julie M. Hall
- Department of Experimental PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
| | - Elie Matar
- ForeFront Parkinson's Disease Research Clinic, Brain and Mind Centre, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jana Godau
- Department of NeurologyKlinikum Kassel GmbHKasselGermany
| | - Daniela Berg
- Department of Neurology, UKSH, Campus KielChristian‐Albrechts‐UniversityKielGermany
| | - Christian Plewnia
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Neurophysiology & Interventional NeuropsychiatryUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
| | | | - Clarence Chiang
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kay L. Double
- Neuroscience Research AustraliaRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Brain and Mind Centre and School of Medical Sciences (Neuroscience)The University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cash RFH, Hendrikse J, Fernando KB, Thompson S, Suo C, Fornito A, Yücel M, Rogasch NC, Zalesky A, Coxon JP. Personalized brain stimulation of memory networks. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:1300-1304. [PMID: 36113762 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The finding that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can enhance memory performance via stimulation of parietal sites within the Cortical-Hippocampal Network counts as one of the most exciting findings in this field in the past decade. However, the first independent effort aiming to fully replicate this finding found no discernible influence of TMS on memory performance. OBJECTIVE We examined whether this might relate to interindividual spatial variation in brain connectivity architecture, and the capacity of personalisation methodologies to overcome the noise inherent across independent scanners and cohorts. METHODS We implemented recently detailed personalisation methodology to retrospectively compute individual-specific parietal targets and then examined relation to TMS outcomes. RESULTS Closer proximity between actual and novel fMRI-personalized targets associated with greater improvement in memory performance. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the potential importance of aligning brain stimulation targets according to individual-specific differences in brain connectivity, and extend upon recent findings in prefrontal cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin F H Cash
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
| | - Joshua Hendrikse
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kavisha B Fernando
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - Sarah Thompson
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chao Suo
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Murat Yücel
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Australia; Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
| | - James P Coxon
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Merkin A, Sghirripa S, Graetz L, Smith AE, Hordacre B, Harris R, Pitcher J, Semmler J, Rogasch NC, Goldsworthy M. Do age-related differences in aperiodic neural activity explain differences in resting EEG alpha? Neurobiol Aging 2022; 121:78-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
10
|
Sasaki R, Hand BJ, Liao WY, Rogasch NC, Fernandez L, Semmler JG, Opie GM. Utilising TMS-EEG to Assess the Response to Cerebellar-Brain Inhibition. Cerebellum 2022:10.1007/s12311-022-01419-y. [PMID: 35661100 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01419-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm indexing excitability of cerebellar projections to motor cortex (M1). Stimulation involved with CBI is often considered to be uncomfortable, and alternative ways to index connectivity between cerebellum and the cortex would be valuable. We therefore sought to assess the utility of electroencephalography in conjunction with TMS (combined TMS-EEG) to record the response to CBI. A total of 33 volunteers (25.7 ± 4.9 years, 20 females) participated across three experiments. These investigated EEG responses to CBI induced with a figure-of-eight (F8; experiment 1) or double cone (DC; experiment 2) conditioning coil over cerebellum, in addition to multisensory sham stimulation (experiment 3). Both F8 and DC coils suppressed early TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) produced by TMS to M1 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the TEP produced by CBI stimulation was related to the motor inhibitory response to CBI recorded in a hand muscle (P < 0.05), but only when using the DC coil. Multisensory sham stimulation failed to modify the M1 TEP. Cerebellar conditioning produced changes in the M1 TEP that were not apparent following sham stimulation, and that were related to the motor inhibitory effects of CBI. Our findings therefore suggest that it is possible to index the response to CBI using TMS-EEG. In addition, while both F8 and DC coils appear to recruit cerebellar projections, the nature of these may be different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Sasaki
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - B J Hand
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - W Y Liao
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - N C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - L Fernandez
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - J G Semmler
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - G M Opie
- Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sghirripa S, Graetz L, Rogasch NC, Semmler JG, Goldsworthy MR. Does predictive cueing of presentation time modulate alpha power and facilitate visual working memory performance in younger and older adults? Brain Cogn 2022; 159:105861. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
12
|
Rogasch NC, Biabani M, Mutanen TP. Designing and comparing cleaning pipelines for TMS-EEG data: a theoretical overview and practical example. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 371:109494. [PMID: 35143852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) is growing in popularity as a method for probing the reactivity and connectivity of neural circuits in basic and clinical research. However, using EEG to measure the neural responses to TMS is challenging due to the unique artifacts introduced by combining the two techniques. In this paper, we overview the artifacts present in TMS-EEG data and the offline cleaning methods used to suppress these unwanted signals. We then describe how open science practices, including the development of open-source toolboxes designed for TMS-EEG analysis (e.g., TESA - the TMS-EEG signal analyser), have improved the availability and reproducibility of TMS-EEG cleaning methods. We provide theoretical and practical considerations for designing TMS-EEG cleaning pipelines and then give an example of how to compare different pipelines using TESA. We show that changing even a single step in a pipeline designed to suppress decay artifacts results in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) with small differences in amplitude and spatial topography. The variability in TEPs resulting from the choice of cleaning pipeline has important implications for comparing TMS-EEG findings between research groups which use different online and offline approaches. Finally, we discuss the challenges of validating cleaning pipelines and recommend that researchers compare outcomes from TMS-EEG experiments using multiple pipelines to ensure findings are not related to the choice of cleaning methods. We conclude that the continued improvement, availability, and validation of cleaning pipelines is essential to ensure TMS-EEG reaches its full potential as a method for studying human neurophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University.
| | - Mana Biabani
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University
| | - Tuomas P Mutanen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Almaghrabi SA, Thewlis D, Thwaites S, Rogasch NC, Lau S, Clark SR, Baumert M. The reproducibility of bio-acoustic features is associated with sample duration, speech task and gender. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2022; 30:167-175. [PMID: 35038295 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2022.3143117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Bio-acoustic properties of speech show evolving value in analyzing psychiatric illnesses. Obtaining a sufficient speech sample length to quantify these properties is essential, but the impact of sample duration on the stability of bio-acoustic features has not been systematically explored. We aimed to evaluate bio-acoustic features' reproducibility against changes in speech durations and tasks. We extracted source, spectral, formant, and prosodic features in 185 English-speaking adults (98 w, 87 m) for reading-a-story and counting tasks. We compared features at 25% of the total sample duration of the reading task to those obtained from non-overlapping randomly selected sub-samples shortened to 75%, 50%, and 25% of total duration using intraclass correlation coefficients. We also compared the features extracted from entire recordings to those measured at 25% of the duration and features obtained from 50% of the duration. Further, we compared features extracted from reading-a-story to counting tasks. Our results show that the number of reproducible features (out of 125) decreased stepwise with duration reduction. Spectral shape, pitch, and formants reached excellent reproducibility. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), loudness, and zero-crossing rate achieved excellent reproducibility only at a longer duration. Reproducibility of source, MFCC derivatives, and voicing probability (VP) was poor. Significant gender differences existed in jitter, MFCC first-derivative, spectral skewness, pitch, VP, and formants. Around 97% of features in both genders were not reproducible across speech tasks, in part due to the short counting task duration. In conclusion, bio-acoustic features are less reproducible in shorter samples and are affected by gender.
Collapse
|
14
|
Hendrikse J, Chye Y, Thompson S, Rogasch NC, Suo C, Coxon JP, Yücel M. Regular aerobic exercise is positively associated with hippocampal structure and function in young and middle-aged adults. Hippocampus 2021; 32:137-152. [PMID: 34961996 DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Regular exercise has numerous benefits for brain health, including the structure and function of the hippocampus. The hippocampus plays a critical role in memory function, and is altered in a number of psychiatric disorders associated with memory impairments (e.g., depression and schizophrenia), as well as healthy aging. While many studies have focused on how regular exercise may improve hippocampal integrity in older individuals, less is known about these effects in young to middle-aged adults. Therefore, we assessed the associations of regular exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness with hippocampal structure and function in these age groups. We recruited 40 healthy young to middle-aged adults, comprised of two groups (n = 20) who self-reported either high or low levels of exercise, according to World Health Organization guidelines. We assessed cardiorespiratory fitness using a graded exercise test (VO2 max) and hippocampal structure via manual tracing of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. We also assessed hippocampal function using magnetic resonance spectroscopy to derive estimates of N-acetyl-aspartate concentration and hippocampal-dependent associative memory and pattern separation tasks. We observed evidence of increased N-acetyl-aspartate concentration and associative memory performance in individuals engaging in high levels of exercise. However, no differences in hippocampal volume or pattern separation capacity were observed between groups. Cardiorespiratory fitness was positively associated with left and right hippocampal volume and N-acetyl-aspartate concentration. However, no associations were observed between cardiorespiratory fitness and associative memory or pattern separation. Therefore, we provide evidence that higher levels of exercise and cardiorespiratory fitness are associated with improved hippocampal structure and function. Exercise may provide a low-risk, effective method of improving hippocampal integrity in an early-to-mid-life stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Hendrikse
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yann Chye
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Thompson
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Chao Suo
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James P Coxon
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Murat Yücel
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Enticott PG, Barlow K, Guastella AJ, Licari MK, Rogasch NC, Middeldorp CM, Clark SR, Vallence AM, Boulton KA, Hickie IB, Whitehouse AJO, Galletly C, Alvares GA, Fujiyama H, Heussler H, Craig JM, Kirkovski M, Mills NT, Rinehart NJ, Donaldson PH, Ford TC, Caeyenberghs K, Albein-Urios N, Bekkali S, Fitzgerald PB. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in autism spectrum disorder: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046830. [PMID: 34233985 PMCID: PMC8264904 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are no well-established biomedical treatments for the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A small number of studies suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, may improve clinical and cognitive outcomes in ASD. We describe here the protocol for a funded multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial to investigate whether a course of rTMS to the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ), which has demonstrated abnormal brain activation in ASD, can improve social communication in adolescents and young adults with ASD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a 4-week course of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS, a variant of rTMS) in ASD. Participants meeting criteria for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition ASD (n=150, aged 14-40 years) will receive 20 sessions of either active iTBS (600 pulses) or sham iTBS (in which a sham coil mimics the sensation of iTBS, but no active stimulation is delivered) to the rTPJ. Participants will undergo a range of clinical, cognitive, epi/genetic, and neurophysiological assessments before and at multiple time points up to 6 months after iTBS. Safety will be assessed via a structured questionnaire and adverse event reporting. The study will be conducted from November 2020 to October 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Monash Health (Melbourne, Australia) under Australia's National Mutual Acceptance scheme. The trial will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice, and findings will be written up for scholarly publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000890932).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Enticott
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Barlow
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Adam J Guastella
- Autism Clinic for Translational Research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa K Licari
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christel M Middeldorp
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Scott R Clark
- Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ann-Maree Vallence
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Psychology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kelsie A Boulton
- Autism Clinic for Translational Research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian B Hickie
- Brain and Mind Centre, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J O Whitehouse
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Cherrie Galletly
- Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gail A Alvares
- Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hakuei Fujiyama
- Discipline of Psychology, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Heussler
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jeffrey M Craig
- IMPACT - the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa Kirkovski
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Natalie T Mills
- Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicole J Rinehart
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Krongold Clinic, Monash Education, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter H Donaldson
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Talitha C Ford
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Heath, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Soukayna Bekkali
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Camperwell, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deco G, Kringelbach ML, Arnatkeviciute A, Oldham S, Sabaroedin K, Rogasch NC, Aquino KM, Fornito A. Dynamical consequences of regional heterogeneity in the brain's transcriptional landscape. Sci Adv 2021; 7:eabf4752. [PMID: 34261652 PMCID: PMC8279501 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Brain regions vary in their molecular and cellular composition, but how this heterogeneity shapes neuronal dynamics is unclear. Here, we investigate the dynamical consequences of regional heterogeneity using a biophysical model of whole-brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dynamics in humans. We show that models in which transcriptional variations in excitatory and inhibitory receptor (E:I) gene expression constrain regional heterogeneity more accurately reproduce the spatiotemporal structure of empirical functional connectivity estimates than do models constrained by global gene expression profiles or MRI-derived estimates of myeloarchitecture. We further show that regional transcriptional heterogeneity is essential for yielding both ignition-like dynamics, which are thought to support conscious processing, and a wide variance of regional-activity time scales, which supports a broad dynamical range. We thus identify a key role for E:I heterogeneity in generating complex neuronal dynamics and demonstrate the viability of using transcriptomic data to constrain models of large-scale brain function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Deco
- Center for Brain and Cognition, Computational Neuroscience Group, Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Roc Boronat 138, Barcelona 08018, Spain
- Institució Catalana de la Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain
- Department of Neuropsychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Morten L Kringelbach
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Center for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Aurina Arnatkeviciute
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stuart Oldham
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristina Sabaroedin
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, and Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Kevin M Aquino
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006 Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Voineskos D, Blumberger DM, Rogasch NC, Zomorrodi R, Farzan F, Foussias G, Rajji TK, Daskalakis ZJ. Neurophysiological effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment resistant depression. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:2306-2316. [PMID: 34167891 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective for treatment resistant depression (TRD), but little is known about rTMS' effects on neurophysiological markers. We previously identified neurophysiological markers in depression (N45 and N100) of GABA receptor mediated inhibition. Here, we indexed TMS-electroencephalographic (TMS-EEG) effects of rTMS. METHODS TMS-EEG data was analyzed from a double blind 2:1 randomized active (10 Hz left/bilateral):sham rTMS TRD trial. Participants underwent TMS-EEG over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) before and after 6 weeks of rTMS. 30 had useable datasets. TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) and components (N45, N100, P60) were examined with global mean field analysis (GMFA) and locally in DLPFC regions of interest. RESULTS The N45 amplitude differed between active and sham groups over time, N100 amplitude did not. N45 (t = 2.975, p = 0.007) and N100 amplitudes (t = 2.177, p = 0.042) decreased after active rTMS, demonstrating alterations in cortical inhibition. TEP amplitudes decreased after active rTMS in left (t = 4.887, p < 0.001) and right DLPFC (t = 4.403, p < 0.001) not sham rTMS, demonstrating alterations in cortical excitability. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide important new knowledge regarding rTMS effects on TMS-EEG measures in TRD, suggesting rTMS reduces neurophysiological markers of inhibition and excitability. SIGNIFICANCE These findings uncover potentially important neurophysiological mechanisms of rTMS action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Alfred and Monash University Central Clinical School, Victoria, Australia
| | - Reza Zomorrodi
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Faranak Farzan
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George Foussias
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tarek K Rajji
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fernandez L, Biabani M, Do M, Opie GM, Hill AT, Barham MP, Teo WP, Byrne LK, Rogasch NC, Enticott PG. Assessing cerebellar-cortical connectivity using concurrent TMS-EEG: a feasibility study. J Neurophysiol 2021; 125:1768-1787. [PMID: 33788622 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00617.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Combined single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to probe the features of local networks in the cerebral cortex. Here, we investigated whether we can use this approach to explore long-range connections between the cerebellum and cerebral cortex. Ten healthy adults received single-pulse suprathreshold TMS to the cerebellum and an occipital/parietal control site with double-cone and figure-of-eight coils while cerebral activity was recorded. A multisensory electrical control condition was used to simulate the sensation of the double-cone coil at the cerebellar site. Two cleaning pipelines were compared, and the spatiotemporal relationships of the EEG output between conditions were examined at sensor and source levels. Cerebellar stimulation with the double-cone coil resulted in large artifact in the EEG trace. The addition of SOUND filtering to the cleaning pipeline improved the signal such that further analyses could be undertaken. The cortical potentials evoked by the active TMS conditions showed strong relationships with the responses to the multisensory control condition after ∼50 ms. A distinct parietal component at ∼42 ms was found following cerebellar double-cone stimulation. Although evoked potentials differed across all conditions at early latencies, it is unclear as to whether these represented TMS-related network activation of the cerebellarthalamocortical tract, or whether components were dominated by sensory contamination and/or coil-driven artifact. This study highlights the need for caution when interpreting outcomes from cerebellar TMS-EEG studies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to systematically assess the feasibility of obtaining TMS-evoked potentials from cerebellar stimulation with concurrent EEG. An innovative control condition using electrical stimulation was modified to mimic the sensory aspects of cerebellar stimulation with a double-cone coil, and a state-of-the art cleaning pipeline was trialled. The extent of artifact contamination in signals from stimulation of a cerebellar and an occipital/parietal control site using two TMS coil types was highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Fernandez
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mana Biabani
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Do
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - George M Opie
- Discipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Aron T Hill
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael P Barham
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei-Peng Teo
- Physical Education and Sports Science Academic Group, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technical University, Singapore, 637616
| | - Linda K Byrne
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.,Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Peter G Enticott
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Biabani M, Fornito A, Coxon JP, Fulcher BD, Rogasch NC. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Physiol 2021; 599:2907-2932. [DOI: 10.1113/jp280966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mana Biabani
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health School of Psychological Sciences Monash University Victoria Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health School of Psychological Sciences Monash University Victoria Australia
| | - James P. Coxon
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health School of Psychological Sciences Monash University Victoria Australia
| | - Ben D. Fulcher
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health School of Psychological Sciences Monash University Victoria Australia
- School of Physics The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales 2006 Australia
| | - Nigel C. Rogasch
- The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health School of Psychological Sciences Monash University Victoria Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry Adelaide Medical School University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology Lifelong Health Theme South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI) Adelaide South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wilson MT, Moezzi B, Rogasch NC. Modeling motor-evoked potentials from neural field simulations of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 132:412-428. [PMID: 33450564 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a population-based biophysical model of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). METHODS We combined an existing MEP model with population-based cortical modeling. Layer 2/3 excitatory and inhibitory neural populations, modeled with neural-field theory, are stimulated with TMS and feed layer 5 corticospinal neurons, which also couple directly but weakly to the TMS pulse. The layer 5 output controls mean motoneuron responses, which generate a series of single motor-unit action potentials that are summed to estimate a MEP. RESULTS A MEP waveform was generated comparable to those observed experimentally. The model captured TMS phenomena including a sigmoidal input-output curve, common paired pulse effects (short interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation, long interval intracortical inhibition) including responses to pharmacological interventions, and a cortical silent period. Changes in MEP amplitude following theta burst paradigms were observed including variability in outcome direction. CONCLUSIONS The model reproduces effects seen in common TMS paradigms. SIGNIFICANCE The model allows population-based modeling of changes in cortical dynamics due to TMS protocols to be assessed in terms of changes in MEPs, thus allowing a clear comparison between population-based modeling predictions and typical experimental outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus T Wilson
- Te Aka Mātuatua-School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
| | - Bahar Moezzi
- Cognitive Ageing and Impairment Neurosciences Laboratory, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, The University of South Australia, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Australia; Brain, Mind and Society Research Hub, The School of Psychologcial Sciences, The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sghirripa S, Graetz L, Merkin A, Rogasch NC, Semmler JG, Goldsworthy MR. Load-dependent modulation of alpha oscillations during working memory encoding and retention in young and older adults. Psychophysiology 2020; 58:e13719. [PMID: 33141460 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Working memory (WM) is vulnerable to age-related decline, particularly under high loads. Visual alpha oscillations contribute to WM performance in younger adults, and although alpha decreases in power and frequency with age, it is unclear if alpha activity supports WM in older adults. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while 24 younger (aged 18-35 years) and 30 older (aged 50-86) adults performed a modified Sternberg task with varying load conditions. Older adults demonstrated slower reaction times at all loads, but there were no significant age differences in WM capacity. Regardless of age, alpha power decreased and alpha frequency increased with load during encoding, and the magnitude of alpha suppression during retention was larger at higher loads. While alpha power during retention was lower than fixation in older, but not younger adults, the relative change from fixation was not significantly different between age groups. Individual differences in alpha power did not predict performance for either age groups or at any WM loads. We demonstrate that alpha power and frequency are modulated in a similar task- and load-dependent manner during WM in both older and younger adults when WM performance is comparable across age groups. IMPACT STATEMENT: Aging is associated with a marked decrease in the power and frequency of alpha oscillations. Here, we demonstrate that when verbal working memory performance is matched across age groups, alpha power and frequency are modulated in a similar task- and load-dependent manner in both young and older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Sghirripa
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Discipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lynton Graetz
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ashley Merkin
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Brain, Mind and Society Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John G Semmler
- Discipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Mitchell R Goldsworthy
- Lifespan Human Neurophysiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Discipline of Physiology, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Lifelong Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mutanen TP, Biabani M, Sarvas J, Ilmoniemi RJ, Rogasch NC. Source-based artifact-rejection techniques available in TESA, an open-source TMS–EEG toolbox. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1349-1351. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
23
|
Goldsworthy MR, Rogasch NC, Ballinger S, Graetz L, Van Dam JM, Harris R, Yu S, Pitcher JB, Baune BT, Ridding MC. Age-related decline of neuroplasticity to intermittent theta burst stimulation of the lateral prefrontal cortex and its relationship with late-life memory performance. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131:2181-2191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
24
|
Corp DT, Bereznicki HGK, Clark GM, Youssef GJ, Fried PJ, Jannati A, Davies CB, Gomes-Osman J, Stamm J, Chung SW, Bowe SJ, Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB, Koch G, Di Lazzaro V, Pascual-Leone A, Enticott PG. Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'. Brain Stimul 2020; 13:1476-1488. [PMID: 32758665 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have attempted to identify the sources of interindividual variability in response to theta-burst stimulation (TBS). However, these studies have been limited by small sample sizes, leading to conflicting results. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS This study brought together over 60 TMS researchers to form the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration', and create the largest known sample of individual participant TBS data to date. The goal was to enable a more comprehensive evaluation of factors driving TBS response variability. METHODS 118 corresponding authors of TMS studies were emailed and asked to provide deidentified individual TMS data. Mixed-effects regression investigated a range of individual and study level variables for their contribution to iTBS and cTBS response variability. RESULTS 430 healthy participants' TBS data was pooled across 22 studies (mean age = 41.9; range = 17-82; females = 217). Baseline MEP amplitude, age, target muscle, and time of day significantly predicted iTBS-induced plasticity. Baseline MEP amplitude and timepoint after TBS significantly predicted cTBS-induced plasticity. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest known study of interindividual variability in TBS. Our findings indicate that a significant portion of variability can be attributed to the methods used to measure the modulatory effects of TBS. We provide specific methodological recommendations in order to control and mitigate these sources of variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel T Corp
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Hannah G K Bereznicki
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Gillian M Clark
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - George J Youssef
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia; Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
| | - Peter J Fried
- Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ali Jannati
- Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Neuromodulation Program and Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charlotte B Davies
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Joyce Gomes-Osman
- Berenson-Allen Center for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Julie Stamm
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sung Wook Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Steven J Bowe
- Deakin Biostatistics Unit Faculty of Health Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; The Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare and Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Giacomo Koch
- Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, Section of Human Physiology, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research. Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Guttmann Brain Health Institute, Institut Guttmann de Neurorehabilitació, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter G Enticott
- Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rogasch NC, Zipser C, Darmani G, Mutanen TP, Biabani M, Zrenner C, Desideri D, Belardinelli P, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Ziemann U. The effects of NMDA receptor blockade on TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex. Sci Rep 2020; 10:3168. [PMID: 32081901 PMCID: PMC7035341 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59911-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Measuring the brain’s response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) offers unique insights into the cortical circuits activated following stimulation, particularly in non-motor regions where less is known about TMS physiology. However, the mechanisms underlying TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) remain largely unknown. We assessed TEP sensitivity to changes in excitatory neurotransmission mediated by n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors following stimulation of non-motor regions. In fourteen male volunteers, resting EEG and TEPs from prefrontal (PFC) and parietal (PAR) cortex were measured before and after administration of either dextromethorphan (NMDA receptor antagonist) or placebo across two sessions in a double-blinded pseudo-randomised crossover design. At baseline, there were amplitude differences between PFC and PAR TEPs across a wide time range (15–250 ms), however the signals were correlated after ~80 ms, suggesting early peaks reflect site-specific activity, whereas late peaks reflect activity patterns less dependent on the stimulated sites. Early TEP peaks were not reliably altered following dextromethorphan compared to placebo, although findings were less clear for later peaks, and low frequency resting oscillations were reduced in power. Our findings suggest that early TEP peaks (<80 ms) from PFC and PAR reflect stimulation site specific activity that is largely insensitive to changes in NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain, Mind and Society Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. .,Hopwood Centre for Neurobiology, Lifelong Health Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia. .,Discipline of Psychiatry, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Carl Zipser
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Darmani
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tuomas P Mutanen
- Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mana Biabani
- Brain, Mind and Society Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christoph Zrenner
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Debora Desideri
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Paolo Belardinelli
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Müller-Dahlhaus
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Biabani M, Fornito A, Mutanen TP, Morrow J, Rogasch NC. Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1537-1552. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
27
|
Chung SW, Thomson CJ, Lee S, Worsley RN, Rogasch NC, Kulkarni J, Thomson RH, Fitzgerald PB, Segrave RA. The influence of endogenous estrogen on high-frequency prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul 2019; 12:1271-1279. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
|
28
|
Bailey NW, Freedman G, Raj K, Sullivan CM, Rogasch NC, Chung SW, Hoy KE, Chambers R, Hassed C, Van Dam NT, Koenig T, Fitzgerald PB. Mindfulness meditators show altered distributions of early and late neural activity markers of attention in a response inhibition task. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0203096. [PMID: 31386663 PMCID: PMC6684080 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Attention is vital for optimal behavioural performance in every-day life. Mindfulness meditation has been shown to enhance attention. However, the components of attention altered by meditation and the related neural activities are underexplored. In particular, the contributions of inhibitory processes and sustained attention are not well understood. To address these points, 34 meditators were compared to 28 age and gender matched controls during electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of neural activity during a Go/Nogo response inhibition task. This task generates a P3 event related potential, which is related to response inhibition processes in Nogo trials, and attention processes across both trial types. Compared with controls, meditators were more accurate at responding to Go and Nogo trials. Meditators showed a more frontally distributed P3 to both Go and Nogo trials, suggesting more frontal involvement in sustained attention rather than activity specific to response inhibition. Unexpectedly, meditators also showed increased positivity over the right parietal cortex prior to visual information reaching the occipital cortex (during the pre-C1 window). Both results were positively related to increased accuracy across both groups. The results suggest that meditators show altered engagement of neural regions related to attention, including both higher order processes generated by frontal regions, and sensory anticipation processes generated by poster regions. This activity may reflect an increased capacity to modulate a range of neural processes in order to meet task requirements. This increased capacity may underlie the improved attentional function observed in mindfulness meditators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil W Bailey
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare, The Epworth Clinic, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gabrielle Freedman
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kavya Raj
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Caley M Sullivan
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sung W Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard Chambers
- Campus Community Division, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig Hassed
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas T Van Dam
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Thomas Koenig
- Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare, The Epworth Clinic, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tremblay S, Rogasch NC, Premoli I, Blumberger DM, Casarotto S, Chen R, Di Lazzaro V, Farzan F, Ferrarelli F, Fitzgerald PB, Hui J, Ilmoniemi RJ, Kimiskidis VK, Kugiumtzis D, Lioumis P, Pascual-Leone A, Pellicciari MC, Rajji T, Thut G, Zomorrodi R, Ziemann U, Daskalakis ZJ. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:802-844. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
30
|
Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB, Hoy KE. Impact of concurrent task performance on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-Induced changes in cortical physiology and working memory. Cortex 2019; 113:37-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
31
|
Voineskos D, Blumberger DM, Zomorrodi R, Rogasch NC, Farzan F, Foussias G, Rajji TK, Daskalakis ZJ. Altered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalographic Markers of Inhibition and Excitation in the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Major Depressive Disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2019; 85:477-486. [PMID: 30503506 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The neurophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) has become a particular focus of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) investigational studies. TMS combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) affords a window to directly measure evoked activity from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), which is of considerable interest in MDD. Our study examined TMS-EEG responses from the DLPFC in persons with MDD compared with those in healthy participants. Specifically, we examined TMS-EEG markers linked to inhibitory and excitatory neurophysiological processes and their balance. METHODS In all, 30 participants with MDD and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy participants underwent single-pulse TMS-EEG to assess inhibition and excitation from DLPFC. TMS-EEG waveforms were analyzed through global mean field amplitude. RESULTS MDD participants demonstrated abnormalities in TMS-EEG markers in the DLPFC. Inhibitory measures-N45 and N100-were larger in the MDD group than in healthy participants (N45 [t = -4.894, p < .001] and N100 [t = -3.496, p = .001]). In a receiver operating characteristic analysis, N45 amplitude predicted depression illness state with 80% sensitivity, 73.3% specificity, and 76.6% accuracy (area under the curve = 0.829, p < .001). The global mean field amplitude area under the curve, a neurophysiological measure of cortical reactivity, was significantly larger in persons with MDD (t = -3.114, p = .003), as was P60 (t = -3.260, p = .002). In healthy participants, there was a positive correlation between inhibitory N45 and excitatory global mean field amplitude area under the curve (r = .711, p < .001) that was not present in persons with MDD (r = .149, p = .43), demonstrating a potential imbalance between inhibition and excitation in MDD. CONCLUSIONS As the TMS-EEG waveform and its components index inhibitory and excitatory activity from the cortex, our results suggest abnormalities in these neurophysiological processes of DLPFC in persons with MDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Voineskos
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reza Zomorrodi
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Faranak Farzan
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; School of Mechatronics Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - George Foussias
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tarek K Rajji
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Emonson MRL, Fitzgerald PB, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE. Neurobiological effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in younger adults, older adults and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 2019; 125:51-61. [PMID: 30625292 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2018] [Revised: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated as a way to improve motor and cognitive functioning, with largely variable results. Currently, relatively little is known about the neurobiological effects, and possible drivers of variability, in either healthy or clinical populations. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the neurobiological effects to tDCS in younger adults, older adults and adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and their relationship to cognitive performance. 20 healthy younger adults, 20 healthy older adults and 9 individuals with MCI participated in the study. All completed neuropsychological tasks and TMS-EEG, prior to and following delivery of 20 min of anodal tDCS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). EEG was also recorded during the 2-Back working memory task. Following tDCS, younger adults demonstrated alterations in early TMS-Evoked Potentials (TEPs), namely P30 and P60. Both younger and older adults exhibited a larger task-related N250 amplitude after stimulation, with contrasting relationships to cognitive performance. The MCI group showed no change in TEPs or ERPs over time. Comparisons between the groups revealed differences in the change in amplitude of early TEP (P60) and ERP (N100) peaks between younger and older adults. Our findings indicate that tDCS was able to modulate cortical activity in younger and older healthy adults, but in varying ways. These findings suggest that varied response to tDCS may be related to factors such as age and the presence/absence of cognitive impairment, and these factors should be considered when assessing the effectiveness of tDCS in healthy and pathological aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R L Emonson
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Australia; School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
| | - P B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Australia; Epworth Clinic, Epworth Healthcare, Camberwell, Australia
| | - N C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Australia
| | - K E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bailey NW, Hoy KE, Rogasch NC, Thomson RH, McQueen S, Elliot D, Sullivan CM, Fulcher BD, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Differentiating responders and non-responders to rTMS treatment for depression after one week using resting EEG connectivity measures. J Affect Disord 2019; 242:68-79. [PMID: 30172227 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Revised: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for depression is costly for both patients and clinics. Simple and cheap methods to predict response would reduce this burden. Resting EEG measures differentiate responders from non-responders, so may have utility for response prediction. METHODS Fifty patients with treatment resistant depression and 21 controls had resting electroencephalography (EEG) recorded at baseline (BL). Patients underwent 5-8 weeks of rTMS treatment, with EEG recordings repeated at week 1 (W1). Forty-two participants had valid BL and W1 EEG data, and 12 were responders. Responders and non-responders were compared at BL and W1 in measures of theta (4-8 Hz) and alpha (8-13 Hz) power and connectivity, frontal theta cordance and alpha peak frequency. Control group comparisons were made for measures that differed between responders and non-responders. A machine learning algorithm assessed the potential to differentiate responders from non-responders using EEG measures in combination with change in depression scores from BL to W1. RESULTS Responders showed elevated theta connectivity across BL and W1. No other EEG measures differed between groups. Responders could be distinguished from non-responders with a mean sensitivity of 0.84 (p = 0.001) and specificity of 0.89 (p = 0.002) using cross-validated machine learning classification on the combination of all EEG and mood measures. LIMITATIONS The low response rate limited our sample size to only 12 responders. CONCLUSION Resting theta connectivity at BL and W1 differ between responders and non-responders, and show potential for predicting response to rTMS treatment for depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N W Bailey
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..
| | - K E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - N C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - R H Thomson
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S McQueen
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Elliot
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - C M Sullivan
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - B D Fulcher
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia
| | - Z J Daskalakis
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - P B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Epworth Healthcare, The Epworth Clinic, Camberwell 3004, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chung SW, Sullivan CM, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Bailey NW, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB. The effects of individualised intermittent theta burst stimulation in the prefrontal cortex: A TMS-EEG study. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 40:608-627. [PMID: 30251765 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted variability in response to theta burst stimulation (TBS) in humans. TBS paradigm was originally developed in rodents to mimic gamma bursts coupled with theta rhythms, and was shown to elicit long-term potentiation. The protocol was subsequently adapted for humans using standardised frequencies of stimulation. However, each individual has different rhythmic firing pattern. The present study sought to explore whether individualised intermittent TBS (Ind iTBS) could outperform the effects of two other iTBS variants. Twenty healthy volunteers received iTBS over left prefrontal cortex using 30 Hz at 6 Hz, 50 Hz at 5 Hz, or individualised frequency in separate sessions. Ind iTBS was determined using theta-gamma coupling during the 3-back task. Concurrent use of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) was used to track changes in cortical plasticity. We also utilised mood ratings using a visual analogue scale and assessed working memory via the 3-back task before and after stimulation. No group-level effect was observed following either 30 or 50 Hz iTBS in TMS-EEG. Ind iTBS significantly increased the amplitude of the TMS-evoked P60, and decreased N100 and P200 amplitudes. A significant positive correlation between neurophysiological change and change in mood rating was also observed. Improved accuracy in the 3-back task was observed following both 50 Hz and Ind iTBS conditions. These findings highlight the critical importance of frequency in the parameter space of iTBS. Tailored stimulation parameters appear more efficacious than standard paradigms in neurophysiological and mood changes. This novel approach presents a promising option and benefits may extend to clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Wook Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Caley M Sullivan
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neil W Bailey
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robin F H Cash
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.,Epworth Clinic, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Habibollahi Saatlou F, Rogasch NC, McNair NA, Biabani M, Pillen SD, Marshall TR, Bergmann TO. MAGIC: An open-source MATLAB toolbox for external control of transcranial magnetic stimulation devices. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:1189-1191. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
36
|
Lee S, Chung SW, Rogasch NC, Thomson CJ, Worsley RN, Kulkarni J, Thomson RH, Fitzgerald PB, Segrave RA. The influence of endogenous estrogen on transcranial direct current stimulation: A preliminary study. Eur J Neurosci 2018; 48:2001-2012. [PMID: 30044024 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulatory technique. Responses to tDCS differ substantially between individuals. Sex hormones that modulate cortical excitability, such as estrogen, may contribute to this inter-individual variability. The influence of estrogen on tDCS after-effects has not yet been researched. This study aimed to investigate whether endogenous estrogen levels influence cortical response to tDCS. Data from 15 male and 14 female healthy adults were analyzed. Males completed one experimental session. Females completed two, one during the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle when estrogen was low, one during the mid-luteal phase when estrogen was high. Each session comprised 15-min of anodal tDCS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Response to stimulation was assessed using electroencephalography with DLPFC transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) administered before, immediately after, and 20-min after tDCS. Changes in amplitudes of N120 and P200 components of TMS-evoked potentials over time were compared between males, women with low estrogen and women with high estrogen. Blood assays verified estrogen levels. Women with high estrogen demonstrated a significant increase in P200 amplitude at both time points and change over time was greater for the high estrogen group compared with males. No significant differences were observed between males and women with low estrogen, or between women with low and high estrogen. These preliminary results indicate that greater neuroplastic response to DLPFC tDCS is seen in highest compared with lowest estrogen states, suggesting that endogenous estrogen levels contribute to inter-individual variability of tDCS outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Lee
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sung W Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Roisin N Worsley
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayashri Kulkarni
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Richard H Thomson
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca A Segrave
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tse NY, Goldsworthy MR, Ridding MC, Coxon JP, Fitzgerald PB, Fornito A, Rogasch NC. The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:8526. [PMID: 29867191 PMCID: PMC5986739 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study assessed the effect of interval duration on the direction and magnitude of changes in cortical excitability and inhibition when applying repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over motor cortex. 15 participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; repeated iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5-iTBS); and with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15-iTBS). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) before and up to 60 mins following stimulation. iTBS-15-iTBS increased MEP amplitude for up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5-iTBS decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the group level findings, only 53% of individuals showed facilitated MEPs following iTBS-15-iTBS, and only 40% inhibited MEPs following iTBS-5-iTBS. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions. These results suggest interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While repeated iTBS can increase the magnitude of MEP facilitation/inhibition in some individuals compared to single iTBS, the response to repeated iTBS appears variable between individuals in this small sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nga Yan Tse
- Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mitchell R Goldsworthy
- Neuromotor Plasticity and Development, Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michael C Ridding
- Neuromotor Plasticity and Development, Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - James P Coxon
- School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Epworth Healthcare, The Epworth Clinic and Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alex Fornito
- Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Farrell AM, Carter A, Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB. Regulating consumer use of transcranial direct current stimulation devices. Med J Aust 2018; 209:8-9. [PMID: 29954302 DOI: 10.5694/mja17.00778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adrian Carter
- Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wilson MT, Fulcher BD, Fung PK, Robinson P, Fornito A, Rogasch NC. Biophysical modeling of neural plasticity induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129:1230-1241. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
40
|
Opie GM, Sidhu SK, Rogasch NC, Ridding MC, Semmler JG. Cortical inhibition assessed using paired-pulse TMS-EEG is increased in older adults. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:545-557. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Revised: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
41
|
Chung SW, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Sullivan CM, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB. Cover Image. Hum Brain Mapp 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
42
|
Wu W, Keller CJ, Rogasch NC, Longwell P, Shpigel E, Rolle CE, Etkin A. ARTIST: A fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for single-pulse TMS-EEG data. Hum Brain Mapp 2018; 39:1607-1625. [PMID: 29331054 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 10/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Concurrent single-pulse TMS-EEG (spTMS-EEG) is an emerging noninvasive tool for probing causal brain dynamics in humans. However, in addition to the common artifacts in standard EEG data, spTMS-EEG data suffer from enormous stimulation-induced artifacts, posing significant challenges to the extraction of neural information. Typically, neural signals are analyzed after a manual time-intensive and often subjective process of artifact rejection. Here we describe a fully automated algorithm for spTMS-EEG artifact rejection. A key step of this algorithm is to decompose the spTMS-EEG data into statistically independent components (ICs), and then train a pattern classifier to automatically identify artifact components based on knowledge of the spatio-temporal profile of both neural and artefactual activities. The autocleaned and hand-cleaned data yield qualitatively similar group evoked potential waveforms. The algorithm achieves a 95% IC classification accuracy referenced to expert artifact rejection performance, and does so across a large number of spTMS-EEG data sets (n = 90 stimulation sites), retains high accuracy across stimulation sites/subjects/populations/montages, and outperforms current automated algorithms. Moreover, the algorithm was superior to the artifact rejection performance of relatively novice individuals, who would be the likely users of spTMS-EEG as the technique becomes more broadly disseminated. In summary, our algorithm provides an automated, fast, objective, and accurate method for cleaning spTMS-EEG data, which can increase the utility of TMS-EEG in both clinical and basic neuroscience settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304.,School of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510640, China
| | - Corey J Keller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Parker Longwell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| | - Emmanuel Shpigel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| | - Camarin E Rolle
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| | - Amit Etkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305.,Stanford Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305.,Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, 94304
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bailey NW, Hoy KE, Rogasch NC, Thomson RH, McQueen S, Elliot D, Sullivan CM, Fulcher BD, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Responders to rTMS for depression show increased fronto-midline theta and theta connectivity compared to non-responders. Brain Stimul 2018; 11:190-203. [PMID: 29128490 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N W Bailey
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - K E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - N C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168 VIC, Australia
| | - R H Thomson
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - S McQueen
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - D Elliot
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - C M Sullivan
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - B D Fulcher
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, 3168 VIC, Australia
| | - Z J Daskalakis
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Epworth Healthcare, The Epworth Clinic, Camberwell, 3004, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Coxon JP, Cash RFH, Hendrikse JJ, Rogasch NC, Stavrinos E, Suo C, Yücel M. GABA concentration in sensorimotor cortex following high-intensity exercise and relationship to lactate levels. J Physiol 2017; 596:691-702. [PMID: 29159914 DOI: 10.1113/jp274660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
KEY POINTS Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was conducted before and after high-intensity interval exercise. Sensorimotor cortex GABA concentration increased by 20%. The increase was positively correlated with the increase in blood lactate. There was no change in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. There were no changes in the glutamate-glutamine-glutathione peak. ABSTRACT High-intensity exercise increases the concentration of circulating lactate. Cortical uptake of blood borne lactate increases during and after exercise; however, the potential relationship with changes in the concentration of neurometabolites remains unclear. Although changes in neurometabolite concentration have previously been demonstrated in primary visual cortex after exercise, it remains unknown whether these changes extend to regions such as the sensorimotor cortex (SM) or executive regions such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). In the present study, we explored the acute after-effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the concentration of gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the combined glutamate-glutamine-glutathione (Glx) spectral peak in the SM and DLPFC, as well as the relationship with blood lactate levels. Following HIIT, there was a robust increase in GABA concentration in the SM, as evident across the majority of participants. This change was not observed in the DLPFC. Furthermore, the increase in SM GABA was positively correlated with an increase in blood lactate. There were no changes in Glx concentration in either region. The observed increase in SM GABA concentration implies functional relevance, whereas the correlation with lactate levels may relate to the metabolic fate of exercise-derived lactate that crosses the blood-brain barrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Coxon
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Robin F H Cash
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joshua J Hendrikse
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Ellen Stavrinos
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Chao Suo
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Murat Yücel
- School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences (MICCN), Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chung SW, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Sullivan CM, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB. Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 39:783-802. [PMID: 29124791 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique capable of increasing cortical excitability beyond the stimulation period. Due to the rapid induction of modulatory effects, prefrontal application of iTBS is gaining popularity as a therapeutic tool for psychiatric disorders such as depression. In an attempt to increase efficacy, higher than conventional intensities are currently being applied. The assumption that this increases neuromodulatory may be mechanistically false for iTBS. This study examined the influence of intensity on the neurophysiological and behavioural effects of iTBS in the prefrontal cortex. Sixteen healthy participants received iTBS over prefrontal cortex at either 50, 75 or 100% resting motor threshold in separate sessions. Single-pulse TMS and concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) was used to assess changes in cortical reactivity measured as TMS-evoked potentials and oscillations. The n-back task was used to assess changes in working memory performance. The data can be summarised as an inverse U-shape relationship between intensity and iTBS plastic effects, where 75% iTBS yielded the largest neurophysiological changes. Improvement in reaction time in the 3-back task was supported by the change in alpha power, however, comparison between conditions revealed no significant differences. The assumption that higher intensity results in greater neuromodulatory effects may be false, at least in healthy individuals, and should be carefully considered for clinical populations. Neurophysiological changes associated with working memory following iTBS suggest functional relevance. However, the effects of different intensities on behavioural performance remain elusive in the present healthy sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Wook Chung
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Caley M Sullivan
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robin F H Cash
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Central Clinical School and The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.,Epworth Clinic, Epworth Healthcare, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chung SW, Lewis BP, Rogasch NC, Saeki T, Thomson RH, Hoy KE, Bailey NW, Fitzgerald PB. Demonstration of short-term plasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with theta burst stimulation: A TMS-EEG study. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128:1117-1126. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
47
|
Hill AT, Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB, Hoy KE. Effects of prefrontal bipolar and high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory in healthy adults. Neuroimage 2017; 152:142-157. [PMID: 28274831 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Revised: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a well-recognised neuromodulatory technology which has been shown to induce short-lasting changes in motor-cortical excitability. The recent and rapid expansion of tDCS into the cognitive domain, however, necessitates deeper mechanistic understanding of its neurophysiological effects over non-motor brain regions. The present study utilised transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to probe the immediate and longer-term effects of both a bipolar (BP-tDCS) and more focal 4×1 High-Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montage applied over the left DLPFC on TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and oscillations in 19 healthy adult participants. 2-back working memory (WM) performance was also assessed as a marker of cognitive function. Region of interest (ROI) analyses taken from the F1 electrode directly adjacent to the stimulation site revealed increased P60 TEP amplitudes at this location 5min following BP-tDCS and 30min following HD-tDCS. Further global cluster based analyses of all scalp electrodes revealed widespread neuromodulatory changes following HD-tDCS, but not BP-tDCS, both five and 30min after stimulation, with reductions also detected in both beta and gamma oscillatory power over parieto-occipital channels 30min after stimulation. No significant changes in WM performance were observed following either HD-tDCS or BP-tDCS. This study highlights the capacity for single-session prefrontal anodal tDCS montages to modulate neurophysiological processes, as assessed with TMS-EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aron T Hill
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Central Clinical School, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Monash University, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Central Clinical School, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, The Alfred and Monash University, Central Clinical School, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hordacre B, Moezzi B, Goldsworthy MR, Rogasch NC, Graetz LJ, Ridding MC. Resting state functional connectivity measures correlate with the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2017; 45:837-845. [DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brenton Hordacre
- The Robinson Research Institute; School of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide 5005 SA Australia
| | - Bahar Moezzi
- Computational and Theoretical Neuroscience Laboratory; School of Information Technology and Mathematical Sciences; University of South Australia; Mawson Lakes SA Australia
| | - Mitchell R. Goldsworthy
- The Robinson Research Institute; School of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide 5005 SA Australia
- Discipline of Psychiatry; School of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide SA Australia
| | - Nigel C. Rogasch
- Brain and Mental Health Laboratory; School of Psychological Sciences and Monash Biomedical Imaging; Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience; Monash University; Melbourne Vic Australia
| | - Lynton J. Graetz
- The Robinson Research Institute; School of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide 5005 SA Australia
| | - Michael C. Ridding
- The Robinson Research Institute; School of Medicine; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide 5005 SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bailey NW, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Maller JJ, Segrave RA, Sullivan CM, Fitzgerald PB. Increased gamma connectivity during working memory retention following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2017; 31:379-389. [PMID: 28095052 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1239273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Alterations to functional connectivity following a traumatic brain injury (TBI) may lead to impaired cognitive performance and major depressive disorder (MDD). In particular, functional gamma band connectivity is thought to reflect information binding important for working memory. The objective of this study was to determine whether altered functional gamma connectivity may be a factor in MDD following TBI (TBI-MDD). RESEARCH DESIGN This study assessed individuals with TBI-MDD, as well as individuals with TBI alone and MDD alone using electroencephalographic recordings while participants performed a working memory task to assess differences in functional connectivity between these groups. METHODS AND PROCEDURES Functional connectivity was compared using the debiased weighted phase lag index (wPLI). wPLI was measured from a group of healthy controls (n = 31), participants with MDD (n = 17), participants with TBI (n = 20) and participants with TBI-MDD (n = 15). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS Contrary to the predictions, this study found both the groups with TBI and TBI-MDD showed higher gamma connectivity from posterior regions during WM retention. CONCLUSIONS This may reflect dysfunctional functional connectivity in these groups, as a result of maladaptive neuroplastic reorganization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil W Bailey
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- b Monash Clinical and Imaging Neuroscience, School of Psychological Science and Monash Biomedical Imaging , Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Kate E Hoy
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Jerome J Maller
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Rebecca A Segrave
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Caley M Sullivan
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- a Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre , Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University , Melbourne , VIC , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Opie GM, Rogasch NC, Goldsworthy MR, Ridding MC, Semmler JG. Investigating TMS–EEG Indices of Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition at Different Interstimulus Intervals. Brain Stimul 2017; 10:65-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Revised: 08/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|