The Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Piezo Inhibits Axon Regeneration

Neurons exhibit a limited ability of repair. Given that mechanical forces affect neuronal outgrowth, it is important to investigate whether mechanosensitive ion channels may regulate axon regeneration. Here, we show that DmPiezo, a Ca²⁺-permeable non-selective cation channel, functions as an intrinsic inhibitor for axon regeneration in Drosophila. DmPiezo activation during axon regeneration induces local Ca²⁺ transients at the growth cone, leading to activation of nitric oxide synthase and the downstream cGMP kinase Foraging or PKG to restrict axon regrowth. Loss of DmPiezo enhances axon regeneration of sensory neurons in the peripheral and CNS. Conditional knockout of its mammalian homolog Piezo1 in vivo accelerates regeneration, while its pharmacological activation in vitro modestly reduces regeneration, suggesting the role of Piezo in inhibiting regeneration may be evolutionarily conserved. These findings provide a precedent for the involvement of mechanosensitive channels in axon regeneration and add a potential target for modulating nervous system repair.

The Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase Promotes Elimination of Paternal Mitochondrial Genomes

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is typically inherited from only one parent [1-3]. In animals, this is usually the mother. Maternal inheritance is often presented as the passive outcome of the difference in cytoplasmic content of egg and sperm; however, active programs enforce uniparental inheritance at two levels, eliminating paternal mitochondrial genomes or destroying mitochondria delivered to the zygote by the sperm [4-13]. Both levels operate in Drosophila [8, 12, 13]. As sperm formation begins, hundreds of doomed mitochondrial genomes are visualized within the two huge mitochondria of each spermatid. These genomes abruptly disappear during spermatogenesis. Genome elimination, which is not in the interests of the restricted genomes, is directed by nuclear genes. Mutation of EndoG, which encodes a mitochondria-targeted endonuclease, retarded elimination [8]. Here, we show that knockdown of the nuclear-encoded mtDNA polymerase (Pol γ-α), Tamas, produces a more complete block of mtDNA elimination. Tamas is found in large particles that localize to mtDNA during genome elimination. We discount a simple possible mechanism by showing that the 3'-exonuclease function of the polymerase is not needed. While DNA elimination is a surprising function for DNA polymerase, it could provide a robust nexus for nuclear control of mitochondrial genome copy number, since use of common interactions for elimination and replication might limit options for the mitochondrial genome to escape restriction. We suggest that the DNA polymerase may play this role more widely and that inappropriate activation of its elimination ability might underlie association of DNA loss syndromes with mutations of the human mtDNA polymerase [14-16].

The response to short-term intensive insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes

AIM

Although a short course of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) can improve beta-cell function and glycaemic control in most patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the impact of this intervention in diabetes of longer duration has not been carefully studied. Thus, we sought to evaluate the effect of short-term IIT in patients with established T2DM.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients, with diabetes of mean 5.9 +/- 6.6 years duration, underwent 4-8 weeks of IIT, with 4-h meal test administered at baseline and at 1 day post-IIT. A positive clinical response was defined as fasting glucose < 7.0 mmol/l off any antidiabetic therapy at the latter test.

RESULTS

A positive response was achieved in 68% (n = 23) of the subjects. At baseline meal test, the responders had lower glucose levels than the non-responders from 120 to 240 min (all timepoints p < or = 0.0008) and higher late incremental area-under-the-C-peptide-curve (AUC(Cpep)), particularly from 60 to 150 min (all p < 0.005). Beta-cell function (ratio of AUC(Cpep) to AUC(gluc) divided by HOMA-IR) was similar between the groups at baseline (median 54.1 vs. 51.3, p = 0.62) but after IIT was significantly higher in the responders (109.3 vs. 57.4, p = 0.009). At baseline, the strongest predictors of the change in beta-cell function were glucose levels between 180 and 240 min (all r = -0.5, p = 0.005) and incremental AUC(Cpep) from 120 to 180 min (all r > or = 0.66, p < or = 0.0001), both reflecting late-phase insulin secretion.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical response to short-term IIT is variable, consistent with the heterogeneity of T2DM. However, preserved late-phase insulin secretion may identify those patients who can benefit from this intervention with improved beta-cell function.

Three Cases of Cytomegalovirus Infection Following Pancreatic Islet Transplantation

Transmission of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is uncommon in patients transplanted with CMV-mismatched pancreatic islets, and CMV-seropositive recipients rarely experience reactivation of the virus or reinfection from a CMV-positive graft. This study describes three cases of CMV infection following islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes despite prophylaxis with valganciclovir. Further studies are needed to evaluate risk factors for CMV transmission and reactivation in this patient population.

Sister chromatids fail to separate during an induced endoreplication cycle in Drosophila embryos

When mitosis is bypassed, as in some cancer cells or in natural endocycles, sister chromosomes remain paired and produce four-stranded diplochromosomes or polytene chromosomes. Cyclin/Cdk1 inactivation blocks entry into mitosis and can reset G2 cells to G1, allowing another round of replication. Reciprocally, persistent expression of Cyclin A/Cdk1 or Cyclin E/Cdk2 blocks Drosophila endocycles. Inactivation of Cyclin A/Cdk1 by mutation or overexpression of the Cyclin/Cdk1 inhibitor, Roughex (Rux), converts the 16(th) embryonic mitotic cycle to an endocycle; however, we show that Rux expression fails to convert earlier cell cycles unless Cyclin E is also downregulated. Following induction of a Rux transgene in Cyclin E mutant embryos during G2 of cell cycle 14 (G2(14)), Cyclins A, B, and B3 disappeared and cells reentered S phase. This rereplication produced diplochromosomes that segregated abnormally at a subsequent mitosis. Thus, like the yeast CKIs Rum1 and Sic1, Drosophila Rux can reset G2 cells to G1. The observed cyclin destruction suggests that cell cycle resetting by Rux was associated with activation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), while the presence of diplochromosomes implies that this activation of APC outside of mitosis was not sufficient to trigger sister disjunction.

Lipopolysaccharide can activate BK channels of arterial smooth muscle in the absence of iNOS expression

The role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in the acute activation of large-conductance, Ca(2+)-dependent K(+) channels (BK channels) by Escherichia coli endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) was studied in murine vascular smooth muscle cells. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and patch clamp recordings were utilised. Within 2 h of donor rat sacrifice, iNOS-like immunoreactivity could be detected in cerebrovascular smooth muscle cells (CVSMCs) enzymatically dispersed from rat cerebral arteries. This staining was absent in cells fixed immediately after donor rat sacrifice. LPS was then applied to the cytoplasmic face of inside-out membrane patches excised from rat CVSMCs within 2-4 h of donor rat sacrifice. It was found that LPS (10-100 microg/ml) rapidly and reversibly increased the open probability of BK channels in these patches. This LPS response was not altered in the presence of the non-isoform specific NOS inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine. LPS responses were then compared in aortic smooth muscle (ASMC) BK channels derived from wild-type and iNOS-knockout (iNOS-KO) mice. LPS activated BK channels in inside-out patches of ASMC membrane derived from both wild-type and iNOS-knockout mice. These studies establish that LPS can activate BK channels by a mechanism quite independent of the well-established pathway mediated by iNOS in vascular smooth muscle cells.

S-phase function of Drosophila cyclin A and its downregulation in G1 phase

BACKGROUND

Cyclin E is the normal inducer of S phase in G1 cells of Drosophila embryos. Stable G1 quiescence requires the downregulation both of cyclin E and of other factors that can bypass the normal regulation of cell cycle progression.

RESULTS

High-level expression of cyclin A triggered the G1/S transition in wild-type embryos and in mutant embryos lacking cyclin E. Three types of control downregulated this activity of cyclin A. First, cyclin destruction limited the accumulation of cyclin A protein in G1. Second, inhibitory phosphorylation of cdc2, the kinase partner of cyclin A, reduced the S-phase promoting activity of cyclin A in G1. Third, rux, a protein with unknown biochemical function, limited cyclin A function in G1. Overexpression of rux blocked S phase induction by coexpressed cyclin A and promoted the degradation of cyclin A. Rux also prevented a stable cyclin A mutant from inducing S phase, indicating that inhibition does not require cyclin destruction, and drove the nuclear localization of cyclin A.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclin A can drive the G1/S transition, but this function is suppressed by three types of control: cyclin A destruction, inhibitory phosphorylation of cdc2, and inhibition by rux. The partly redundant contributions of these three inhibitory mechanisms safeguard the stability of G1 quiescence until the induction of cyclin E. The action of rux during G1 resembles the action of inhibitors of mitotic kinases present during G1 in yeast, although no obvious sequence similarity exists.

Cloning of Drosophila MCM homologs and analysis of their requirement during embryogenesis

MCM (minichromosome maintenance) gene family of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes essential DNA replication factors that participate in the initiation of DNA replication. In addition, their localization to the nucleus in a mitosis-dependent manner fueled the hypothesis that MCMs also act to couple DNA replication to mitosis. We report the identification of a Drosophila gene family with extensive sequence identity to the MCM genes. Results from antibody injection experiments suggest that MCMs play an essential role in DNA replication during embryogenesis. Evolutionary conservation of MCM sequences and function in Drosophila could potentially facilitate studies of how initiation of DNA replication is regulated and coupled to mitosis during metazoan development.