Cardiovascular outcomes of sodium-glucose Co-transporter 2 inhibitors use after myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Patients who had acute myocardial infarction are at high risk of negative cardiac outcomes and previous SGLT2i landmark trials excluded these patients. It therefore remains unclear if SGLT2i is safe and confers beneficial cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials that evaluated the outcomes of adding SGLT2i to conventional post-myocardial infarction care. Random-effects model meta-analysis via RevMan 5.4 was done on data extracted from pooled 11,204 patients.

RESULTS

SGLT2i use after acute myocardial infarction was significantly associated with reduced heart failure hospitalization (OR: 0.77, 95%CI: 0.62-0.96, p=0.02), but was not associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (OR: 1.05, 95%CI: 0.77-1.43, p=0.75), cardiac-related death (OR: 1.04, 95%CI: 0.83-1.30, p=0.76), or major adverse cardiac events (OR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.77-1.05, p=0.18).

CONCLUSION

SGLT2 inhibitor therapy after acute myocardial infarction is safe and is associated with a reduced risk of heart failure hospitalization, but not with all-cause mortality.

Incidence of Atrioventricular Blocks and its Association with In-Hospital Mortality and Morbidity in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019

Background

Cardiovascular sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection have been explored by clinicians and researchers all over the world.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of atrioventricular block (AV) in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and its association between in-hospital morbidity and mortality.

Methods

In-hospital electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 438 patients were compared with their prior or baseline ECGs to ascertain the development of new onset AV block. Patients who developed new AV blocks were then followed at 30 and 90 days post-discharge to check for resolution of AV block. Demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, and complications during their hospital stay were evaluated. Major complications including respiratory failure requiring oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation, sepsis, deep vein thrombosis, elevated troponins, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, as well as death were compared between those who developed new onset AV blocks and those who did not.

Results

Based on our single center study, the incidence of new onset AV blocks among patients admitted for COVID-19 during the study period was 5.5 cases per 100 patients. New onset AV blocks were not associated with longer hospital and ICU length of stay, increased intubation rates, or increased mortality.

Conclusion

Although the development of a new onset AV block is most likely multifactorial and not solely due to COVID-19, it is still important for clinicians to be mindful about the possibility of developing symptomatic bradycardia and life-threatening arrhythmias in patients admitted for COVID-19. This can be achieved by appropriate rhythm monitoring in-patient but the need for a cardiac event monitor upon discharge is unlikely to be necessary. Careful history taking, including family and drug use history is also of great importance as emerging drug therapies for COVID-19 have potential arrhythmogenic effects.