1
|
Lenardič A, Domenig SA, Zvick J, Bundschuh N, Tarnowska-Sengül M, Furrer R, Noé FJ, Trautmann CLL, Ghosh A, Bacchin G, Gjonlleshaj P, Qabrati X, Masschelein E, De Bock K, Handschin C, Bar-Nur O. Generation of allogenic and xenogeneic functional muscle stem cells for intramuscular transplantation. J Clin Invest 2024:e166998. [PMID: 38713532 DOI: 10.1172/jci166998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Satellite cells, the stem cells of skeletal muscle tissue, hold a remarkable regeneration capacity and therapeutic potential in regenerative medicine. However, low satellite cell yield from autologous or donor-derived muscles hinders the adoption of satellite cell transplantation for the treatment of muscle diseases, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). To address this limitation, here we investigated whether satellite cells can be derived in allogeneic or xenogeneic animal hosts. First, injection of CRISPR/Cas9-corrected mouse DMD-induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into mouse blastocysts carrying an ablation system of host satellite cells gave rise to intraspecies chimeras exclusively carrying iPSC-derived satellite cells. Furthermore, injection of genetically corrected DMD-iPSCs into rat blastocysts resulted in the formation of interspecies rat-mouse chimeras harboring mouse satellite cells. Remarkably, iPSC-derived satellite cells or derivative myoblasts produced in intraspecies or interspecies chimeras restored dystrophin expression in DMD mice following intramuscular transplantation, and contributed to the satellite cell pool. Collectively, this study demonstrates the feasibility of producing therapeutically competent stem cells across divergent animal species, raising the possibility of generating human muscle stem cells in large animals for regenerative medicine purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajda Lenardič
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Seraina A Domenig
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Joel Zvick
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bundschuh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Monika Tarnowska-Sengül
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | | | - Falko J Noé
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Christine Ling Li Trautmann
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Giada Bacchin
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Pjeter Gjonlleshaj
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Xhem Qabrati
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Evi Masschelein
- Laboratory of Exercise and Health, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Katrien De Bock
- Laboratory of Exercise and Health, ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich), Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | | | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qabrati X, Kim I, Ghosh A, Bundschuh N, Noé F, Palmer AS, Bar-Nur O. Transgene-free direct conversion of murine fibroblasts into functional muscle stem cells. NPJ Regen Med 2023; 8:43. [PMID: 37553383 PMCID: PMC10409758 DOI: 10.1038/s41536-023-00317-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcription factor-based cellular reprogramming provides an attractive approach to produce desired cell types for regenerative medicine purposes. Such cellular conversions are widely dependent on viral vectors to efficiently deliver and express defined factors in target cells. However, use of viral vectors is associated with unfavorable genomic integrations that can trigger deleterious molecular consequences, rendering this method a potential impediment to clinical applications. Here, we report on a highly efficient transgene-free approach to directly convert mouse fibroblasts into induced myogenic progenitor cells (iMPCs) by overexpression of synthetic MyoD-mRNA in concert with an enhanced small molecule cocktail. First, we performed a candidate compound screen and identified two molecules that enhance fibroblast reprogramming into iMPCs by suppression of the JNK and JAK/STAT pathways. Simultaneously, we developed an optimal transfection protocol to transiently overexpress synthetic MyoD-mRNA in fibroblasts. Combining these two techniques enabled robust and rapid reprogramming of fibroblasts into Pax7 positive iMPCs in as little as 10 days. Nascent transgene-free iMPCs proliferated extensively in vitro, expressed a suite of myogenic stem cell markers, and could differentiate into highly multinucleated and contractile myotubes. Furthermore, using global and single-cell transcriptome assays, we delineated gene expression changes associated with JNK and JAK/STAT pathway inhibition during reprogramming, and identified in iMPCs a Pax7+ stem cell subpopulation resembling satellite cells. Last, transgene-free iMPCs robustly engrafted skeletal muscles of a Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse model, restoring dystrophin expression in hundreds of myofibers. In summary, this study reports on an improved and clinically safer approach to convert fibroblasts into myogenic stem cells that can efficiently contribute to muscle regeneration in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xhem Qabrati
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Inseon Kim
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bundschuh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Falko Noé
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrew S Palmer
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zvick J, Tarnowska-Sengül M, Ghosh A, Bundschuh N, Gjonlleshaj P, Hinte LC, Trautmann CL, Noé F, Qabrati X, Domenig SA, Kim I, Hennek T, von Meyenn F, Bar-Nur O. Exclusive generation of rat spermatozoa in sterile mice utilizing blastocyst complementation with pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 2022; 17:1942-1958. [PMID: 35931077 PMCID: PMC9481912 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Blastocyst complementation denotes a technique that aims to generate organs, tissues, or cell types in animal chimeras via injection of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) into genetically compromised blastocyst-stage embryos. Here, we report on successful complementation of the male germline in adult chimeras following injection of mouse or rat PSCs into mouse blastocysts carrying a mutation in Tsc22d3, an essential gene for spermatozoa production. Injection of mouse PSCs into Tsc22d3-Knockout (KO) blastocysts gave rise to intraspecies chimeras exclusively embodying PSC-derived functional spermatozoa. In addition, injection of rat embryonic stem cells (rESCs) into Tsc22d3-KO embryos produced interspecies mouse-rat chimeras solely harboring rat spermatids and spermatozoa capable of fertilizing oocytes. Furthermore, using single-cell RNA sequencing, we deconstructed rat spermatogenesis occurring in a mouse-rat chimera testis. Collectively, this study details a method for exclusive xenogeneic germ cell production in vivo, with implications that may extend to rat transgenesis, or endangered animal species conservation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Zvick
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Monika Tarnowska-Sengül
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland; Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bundschuh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Pjeter Gjonlleshaj
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Laura C Hinte
- Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Christine L Trautmann
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Falko Noé
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland; Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, Switzerland
| | - Xhem Qabrati
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Seraina A Domenig
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Inseon Kim
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Hennek
- ETH Phenomics Center, ETH Zurich, Zurich 8049, Switzerland
| | - Ferdinand von Meyenn
- Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach 8603, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim I, Ghosh A, Bundschuh N, Hinte L, Petrosyan E, von Meyenn F, Bar-Nur O. Integrative molecular roadmap for direct conversion of fibroblasts into myocytes and myogenic progenitor cells. Sci Adv 2022; 8:eabj4928. [PMID: 35385316 PMCID: PMC8986113 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abj4928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Transient MyoD overexpression in concert with small molecule treatment reprograms mouse fibroblasts into induced myogenic progenitor cells (iMPCs). However, the molecular landscape and mechanisms orchestrating this cellular conversion remain unknown. Here, we undertook an integrative multiomics approach to delineate the process of iMPC reprogramming in comparison to myogenic transdifferentiation mediated solely by MyoD. Using transcriptomics, proteomics, and genome-wide chromatin accessibility assays, we unravel distinct molecular trajectories that govern the two processes. Notably, only iMPC reprogramming is characterized by gradual up-regulation of muscle stem cell markers, unique signaling pathways, and chromatin remodelers in conjunction with exclusive chromatin opening in core myogenic promoters. In addition, we determine that the Notch pathway is indispensable for iMPC formation and self-renewal and further use the Notch ligand Dll1 to homogeneously propagate iMPCs. Collectively, this study charts divergent molecular blueprints for myogenic transdifferentiation or reprogramming and underpins the heightened capacity of iMPCs for capturing myogenesis ex vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inseon Kim
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bundschuh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Laura Hinte
- Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Eduard Petrosyan
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Ferdinand von Meyenn
- Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Domenig SA, Bundschuh N, Lenardič A, Ghosh A, Kim I, Qabrati X, D'Hulst G, Bar-Nur O. CRISPR/Cas9 editing of directly reprogrammed myogenic progenitors restores dystrophin expression in a mouse model of muscular dystrophy. Stem Cell Reports 2021; 17:321-336. [PMID: 34995499 PMCID: PMC8828535 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic mutations in dystrophin manifest in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most commonly inherited muscle disease. Here, we report on reprogramming of fibroblasts from two DMD mouse models into induced myogenic progenitor cells (iMPCs) by MyoD overexpression in concert with small molecule treatment. DMD iMPCs proliferate extensively, while expressing myogenic stem cell markers including Pax7 and Myf5. Additionally, DMD iMPCs readily give rise to multinucleated myofibers that express mature skeletal muscle markers; however, they lack DYSTROPHIN expression. Utilizing an exon skipping-based approach with CRISPR/Cas9, we report on genetic correction of the dystrophin mutation in DMD iMPCs and restoration of protein expression in vitro. Furthermore, engraftment of corrected DMD iMPCs into the muscles of dystrophic mice restored DYSTROPHIN expression and contributed to the muscle stem cell reservoir. Collectively, our findings report on a novel in vitro cellular model for DMD and utilize it in conjunction with gene editing to restore DYSTROPHIN expression in vivo. iMPCs generated from DMD mouse models DMD iMPCs are expandable and express satellite cell and differentiation markers Correction of the dystrophin mutation in DMD iMPCs utilizing CRISPR/Cas9 Engraftment of corrected DMD iMPCs restores DYSTROPHIN expression in vivo
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seraina A Domenig
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bundschuh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Ajda Lenardič
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Adhideb Ghosh
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland; Functional Genomics Center Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Inseon Kim
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Xhem Qabrati
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Gommaar D'Hulst
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yagi M, Ji F, Charlton J, Cristea S, Messemer K, Horwitz N, Di Stefano B, Tsopoulidis N, Hoetker MS, Huebner AJ, Bar-Nur O, Almada AE, Yamamoto M, Patelunas A, Goldhamer DJ, Wagers AJ, Michor F, Meissner A, Sadreyev RI, Hochedlinger K. Dissecting dual roles of MyoD during lineage conversion to mature myocytes and myogenic stem cells. Genes Dev 2021; 35:1209-1228. [PMID: 34413137 PMCID: PMC8415322 DOI: 10.1101/gad.348678.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The generation of myotubes from fibroblasts upon forced MyoD expression is a classic example of transcription factor-induced reprogramming. We recently discovered that additional modulation of signaling pathways with small molecules facilitates reprogramming to more primitive induced myogenic progenitor cells (iMPCs). Here, we dissected the transcriptional and epigenetic dynamics of mouse fibroblasts undergoing reprogramming to either myotubes or iMPCs using a MyoD-inducible transgenic model. Induction of MyoD in fibroblasts combined with small molecules generated Pax7+ iMPCs with high similarity to primary muscle stem cells. Analysis of intermediate stages of iMPC induction revealed that extinction of the fibroblast program preceded induction of the stem cell program. Moreover, key stem cell genes gained chromatin accessibility prior to their transcriptional activation, and these regions exhibited a marked loss of DNA methylation dependent on the Tet enzymes. In contrast, myotube generation was associated with few methylation changes, incomplete and unstable reprogramming, and an insensitivity to Tet depletion. Finally, we showed that MyoD's ability to bind to unique bHLH targets was crucial for generating iMPCs but dispensable for generating myotubes. Collectively, our analyses elucidate the role of MyoD in myogenic reprogramming and derive general principles by which transcription factors and signaling pathways cooperate to rewire cell identity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaki Yagi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Fei Ji
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Jocelyn Charlton
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Genome Regulation, Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simona Cristea
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA
| | - Kathleen Messemer
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
| | - Naftali Horwitz
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Bruno Di Stefano
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Nikolaos Tsopoulidis
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Michael S Hoetker
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Aaron J Huebner
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| | - Albert E Almada
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Masakazu Yamamoto
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - Anthony Patelunas
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - David J Goldhamer
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA
| | - Amy J Wagers
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,The Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,The Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Alexander Meissner
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.,Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Department of Genome Regulation, Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ruslan I Sadreyev
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.,Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.,Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Masschelein E, D'Hulst G, Zvick J, Hinte L, Soro-Arnaiz I, Gorski T, von Meyenn F, Bar-Nur O, De Bock K. Exercise promotes satellite cell contribution to myofibers in a load-dependent manner. Skelet Muscle 2020; 10:21. [PMID: 32646489 PMCID: PMC7346400 DOI: 10.1186/s13395-020-00237-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Satellite cells (SCs) are required for muscle repair following injury and are involved in muscle remodeling upon muscular contractions. Exercise stimulates SC accumulation and myonuclear accretion. To what extent exercise training at different mechanical loads drive SC contribution to myonuclei however is unknown. Results By performing SC fate tracing experiments, we show that 8 weeks of voluntary wheel running increased SC contribution to myofibers in mouse plantar flexor muscles in a load-dependent, but fiber type-independent manner. Increased SC fusion however was not exclusively linked to muscle hypertrophy as wheel running without external load substantially increased SC fusion in the absence of fiber hypertrophy. Due to nuclear propagation, nuclear fluorescent fate tracing mouse models were inadequate to quantify SC contribution to myonuclei. Ultimately, by performing fate tracing at the DNA level, we show that SC contribution mirrors myonuclear accretion during exercise. Conclusions Collectively, mechanical load during exercise independently promotes SC contribution to existing myofibers. Also, due to propagation of nuclear fluorescent reporter proteins, our data warrant caution for the use of existing reporter mouse models for the quantitative evaluation of satellite cell contribution to myonuclei.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evi Masschelein
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gommaar D'Hulst
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joel Zvick
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Hinte
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Inés Soro-Arnaiz
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tatiane Gorski
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ferdinand von Meyenn
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Nutrition and Metabolic Epigenetics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katrien De Bock
- Department Health Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
D’Hulst G, Masschelein E, Palmer A, Bar-Nur O, De Bock K. Exercise promotes satellite cell contribution to myofibers in a load‐dependent manner. FASEB J 2020. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.09179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
9
|
D'Hulst G, Palmer AS, Masschelein E, Bar-Nur O, De Bock K. Voluntary Resistance Running as a Model to Induce mTOR Activation in Mouse Skeletal Muscle. Front Physiol 2019; 10:1271. [PMID: 31636571 PMCID: PMC6787551 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term voluntary resistance running has been shown to be a valid model to induce muscle growth in rodents. Moreover, the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a key signaling complex regulating exercise/nutrient-induced alterations in muscle protein synthesis. How acute resistance running affects mTORC1 signaling in muscle and if resistance applied to the wheel can modulate mTORC1 activation has not yet been fully elucidated. Here, we show that both acute resistance running and acute free running activated mTORC1 signaling in the m. gastrocnemius, m. soleus, and m. plantaris, but not in m. tibialis anterior of mice when compared to sedentary controls. Furthermore, only the low threshold oxidative part in the m. gastrocnemius showed increased mTORC1 signaling upon running and acute heavy-load resistance running evoked higher downstream mTORC1 signaling in both m. soleus and m. plantaris than free running without resistance, pointing toward mechanical load as an important independent regulator of mTORC1. Collectively, in this study, we show that voluntary resistance running is an easy-to-use, time-efficient and low stress model to study acute alterations in mTORC1 signaling upon high-load muscular contractions in mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gommaar D'Hulst
- Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrew S Palmer
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Evi Masschelein
- Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Laboratory of Regenerative and Movement Biology, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Katrien De Bock
- Laboratory of Exercise and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu LL, Brumbaugh J, Bar-Nur O, Smith Z, Stadtfeld M, Meissner A, Hochedlinger K, Michor F. Probabilistic Modeling of Reprogramming to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Rep 2016; 17:3395-3406. [PMID: 28009305 PMCID: PMC5467646 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Revised: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is typically an inefficient and asynchronous process. A variety of technological efforts have been made to accelerate and/or synchronize this process. To define a unified framework to study and compare the dynamics of reprogramming under different conditions, we developed an in silico analysis platform based on mathematical modeling. Our approach takes into account the variability in experimental results stemming from probabilistic growth and death of cells and potentially heterogeneous reprogramming rates. We suggest that reprogramming driven by the Yamanaka factors alone is a more heterogeneous process, possibly due to cell-specific reprogramming rates, which could be homogenized by the addition of additional factors. We validated our approach using publicly available reprogramming datasets, including data on early reprogramming dynamics as well as cell count data, and thus we demonstrated the general utility and predictive power of our methodology for investigating reprogramming and other cell fate change systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin L Liu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Justin Brumbaugh
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Zachary Smith
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Matthias Stadtfeld
- The Helen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Alexander Meissner
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Borkent M, Bennett BD, Lackford B, Bar-Nur O, Brumbaugh J, Wang L, Du Y, Fargo DC, Apostolou E, Cheloufi S, Maherali N, Elledge SJ, Hu G, Hochedlinger K. A Serial shRNA Screen for Roadblocks to Reprogramming Identifies the Protein Modifier SUMO2. Stem Cell Reports 2016; 6:704-716. [PMID: 26947976 PMCID: PMC4939549 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2015] [Revised: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from differentiated cells following forced expression of OCT4, KLF4, SOX2, and C-MYC (OKSM) is slow and inefficient, suggesting that transcription factors have to overcome somatic barriers that resist cell fate change. Here, we performed an unbiased serial shRNA enrichment screen to identify potent repressors of somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs. This effort uncovered the protein modifier SUMO2 as one of the strongest roadblocks to iPSC formation. Depletion of SUMO2 both enhances and accelerates reprogramming, yielding transgene-independent, chimera-competent iPSCs after as little as 38 hr of OKSM expression. We further show that the SUMO2 pathway acts independently of exogenous C-MYC expression and in parallel with small-molecule enhancers of reprogramming. Importantly, suppression of SUMO2 also promotes the generation of human iPSCs. Together, our results reveal sumoylation as a crucial post-transcriptional mechanism that resists the acquisition of pluripotency from fibroblasts using defined factors. Genome-wide serial shRNA screen identifies novel barriers to reprogramming Suppression of sumoylation factor SUMO2 enhances reprogramming in mouse and human SUMO2 suppression works in concert with small molecules and in the absence of c-Myc SUMO2 suppression enables iPSC generation after only 38 hr of OKSM expression
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marti Borkent
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Brian D Bennett
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Brad Lackford
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Justin Brumbaugh
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Li Wang
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Ying Du
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - David C Fargo
- Integrative Bioinformatics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Effie Apostolou
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Sihem Cheloufi
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Nimet Maherali
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Stephen J Elledge
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA; Department of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Guang Hu
- Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- Department of Molecular Biology, Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bar-Nur O, Verheul C, Sommer AG, Brumbaugh J, Schwarz BA, Lipchina I, Huebner AJ, Mostoslavsky G, Hochedlinger K. Lineage conversion induced by pluripotency factors involves transient passage through an iPSC stage. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33:761-8. [PMID: 26098450 PMCID: PMC4840929 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Brief expression of pluripotency-associated factors such as Oct4, Klf4, Sox2 and c-Myc (OKSM), in combination with differentiation-inducing signals, has been reported to trigger transdifferentiation of fibroblasts into other cell types. Here we show that OKSM expression in mouse fibroblasts gives rise to both induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and induced neural stem cells (iNSCs) under conditions previously shown to induce only iNSCs. Fibroblast-derived iNSC colonies silenced retroviral transgenes and reactivated silenced X chromosomes, both hallmarks of pluripotent stem cells. Moreover, lineage tracing with an Oct4-CreER labeling system demonstrated that virtually all iNSC colonies originated from cells transiently expressing Oct4, whereas ablation of Oct4(+) cells prevented iNSC formation. Lastly, an alternative transdifferentiation cocktail that lacks Oct4 and was reportedly unable to support induced pluripotency yielded iPSCs and iNSCs carrying the Oct4-CreER-derived lineage label. Together, these data suggest that iNSC generation from fibroblasts using OKSM and other pluripotency-related reprogramming factors requires passage through a transient iPSC state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Bar-Nur
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cassandra Verheul
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andreia G Sommer
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine (CReM), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Justin Brumbaugh
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin A Schwarz
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Inna Lipchina
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aaron J Huebner
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gustavo Mostoslavsky
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine (CReM), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- 1] Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [5] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bar-Nur O, Brumbaugh J, Verheul C, Apostolou E, Pruteanu-Malinici I, Walsh RM, Ramaswamy S, Hochedlinger K. Small molecules facilitate rapid and synchronous iPSC generation. Nat Methods 2014; 11:1170-6. [PMID: 25262205 PMCID: PMC4326224 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/11/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) upon overexpression of OCT4, KLF4, SOX2, and c-MYC (OKSM) provides a powerful system to interrogate basic mechanisms of cell fate change. However, iPSC formation with standard methods is protracted and inefficient, resulting in heterogeneous cell populations. Here we show that exposure of OKSM-expressing cells to both ascorbic acid and a GSK3-beta inhibitor (termed “AGi”) facilitates more synchronous and rapid iPSC formation from a variety of mouse cell types. AGi treatment restored the ability of refractory cell populations to yield iPSC colonies, and it attenuated the activation of developmental regulators commonly observed during the reprogramming process. Moreover, AGi supplementation gave rise to chimera-competent iPSCs after as little as 48 hours of OKSM expression. Our results offer a simple modification to the reprogramming protocol, facilitating iPSC induction at unparalleled efficiencies and enabling dissection of the underlying mechanisms in more homogeneous cell populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Bar-Nur
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Justin Brumbaugh
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cassandra Verheul
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Effie Apostolou
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Iulian Pruteanu-Malinici
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryan M Walsh
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sridhar Ramaswamy
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [4] Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- 1] Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA. [4] Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [5] Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schwarz BA, Bar-Nur O, Silva JCR, Hochedlinger K. Nanog is dispensable for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr Biol 2014; 24:347-50. [PMID: 24461999 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Revised: 12/13/2013] [Accepted: 12/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Cellular reprogramming from somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be achieved through forced expression of the transcription factors Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and c-Myc (OKSM) [1-4]. These factors, in combination with environmental cues, induce a stable intrinsic pluripotency network that confers indefinite self-renewal capacity on iPSCs. In addition to Oct4 and Sox2, the homeodomain-containing transcription factor Nanog is an integral part of the pluripotency network [5-11]. Although Nanog expression is not required for the maintenance of pluripotent stem cells, it has been reported to be essential for the establishment of both embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from blastocysts and iPSCs from somatic cells [10, 12]. Here we revisit the role of Nanog in direct reprogramming. Surprisingly, we find that Nanog is dispensable for iPSC formation under optimized culture conditions. We further document that Nanog-deficient iPSCs are transcriptionally highly similar to wild-type iPSCs and support the generation of teratomas and chimeric mice. Lastly, we provide evidence that the presence of ascorbic acid in the culture media is critical for overcoming the previously observed reprogramming block of Nanog knockout cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Schwarz
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 1350 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 1350 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - José C R Silva
- Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK; Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK
| | - Konrad Hochedlinger
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, 1350 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, 7 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nissenbaum J, Bar-Nur O, Ben-David E, Benvenisty N. Global indiscriminate methylation in cell-specific gene promoters following reprogramming into human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports 2013; 1:509-17. [PMID: 24371806 PMCID: PMC3871396 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2013.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2013] [Revised: 10/31/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Molecular reprogramming of somatic cells into human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is accompanied by extensive changes in gene expression patterns and epigenetic marks. To better understand the link between gene expression and DNA methylation, we have profiled human somatic cells from different embryonic cell types (endoderm, mesoderm, and parthenogenetic germ cells) and the iPSCs generated from them. We show that reprogramming is accompanied by extensive DNA methylation in CpG-poor promoters, sparing CpG-rich promoters. Intriguingly, methylation in CpG-poor promoters occurred not only in downregulated genes, but also in genes that are not expressed in the parental somatic cells or their respective iPSCs. These genes are predominantly tissue-specific genes of other cell types from different lineages. Our results suggest a role of DNA methylation in the silencing of the somatic cell identity by global nonspecific methylation of tissue-specific genes from all lineages, regardless of their expression in the parental somatic cells. Gene expression and DNA methylation profiles were compared for various human iPSCs Reprogramming is accompanied by extensive DNA methylation in CpG-poor promoters Hypermethylation occurs in cell-specific genes regardless of expression status Methylation regulates silencing of CpG-poor promoters in a nonspecific manner
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Nissenbaum
- Stem Cell Unit, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel ; Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ori Bar-Nur
- Stem Cell Unit, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel ; Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel ; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Eyal Ben-David
- Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Nissim Benvenisty
- Stem Cell Unit, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel ; Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Apostolou E, Ferrari F, Walsh RM, Bar-Nur O, Stadtfeld M, Cheloufi S, Stuart HT, Polo JM, Ohsumi TK, Borowsky ML, Kharchenko PV, Park PJ, Hochedlinger K. Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 2013; 12:699-712. [PMID: 23665121 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2012] [Revised: 03/27/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The chromatin state of pluripotency genes has been studied extensively in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and differentiated cells, but their potential interactions with other parts of the genome remain largely unexplored. Here, we identified a genome-wide, pluripotency-specific interaction network around the Nanog promoter by adapting circular chromosome conformation capture sequencing. This network was rearranged during differentiation and restored in induced pluripotent stem cells. A large fraction of Nanog-interacting loci were bound by Mediator or cohesin in pluripotent cells. Depletion of these proteins from ESCs resulted in a disruption of contacts and the acquisition of a differentiation-specific interaction pattern prior to obvious transcriptional and phenotypic changes. Similarly, the establishment of Nanog interactions during reprogramming often preceded transcriptional upregulation of associated genes, suggesting a causative link. Our results document a complex, pluripotency-specific chromatin "interactome" for Nanog and suggest a functional role for long-range genomic interactions in the maintenance and induction of pluripotency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effie Apostolou
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Polo JM, Anderssen E, Walsh RM, Schwarz BA, Nefzger CM, Lim SM, Borkent M, Apostolou E, Alaei S, Cloutier J, Bar-Nur O, Cheloufi S, Stadtfeld M, Figueroa ME, Robinton D, Natesan S, Melnick A, Zhu J, Ramaswamy S, Hochedlinger K. A molecular roadmap of reprogramming somatic cells into iPS cells. Cell 2013; 151:1617-32. [PMID: 23260147 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 642] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2012] [Revised: 10/09/2012] [Accepted: 11/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Factor-induced reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) is inefficient, complicating mechanistic studies. Here, we examined defined intermediate cell populations poised to becoming iPSCs by genome-wide analyses. We show that induced pluripotency elicits two transcriptional waves, which are driven by c-Myc/Klf4 (first wave) and Oct4/Sox2/Klf4 (second wave). Cells that become refractory to reprogramming activate the first but fail to initiate the second transcriptional wave and can be rescued by elevated expression of all four factors. The establishment of bivalent domains occurs gradually after the first wave, whereas changes in DNA methylation take place after the second wave when cells acquire stable pluripotency. This integrative analysis allowed us to identify genes that act as roadblocks during reprogramming and surface markers that further enrich for cells prone to forming iPSCs. Collectively, our data offer new mechanistic insights into the nature and sequence of molecular events inherent to cellular reprogramming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose M Polo
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Center for Regenerative Medicine, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bar-Nur O, Russ H, Efrat S, Benvenisty N. Epigenetic Memory and Preferential Lineage-Specific Differentiation in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Human Pancreatic Islet Beta Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
19
|
Bar-Nur O. Harnessing induced pluripotent stem cells for the modeling and treatment of neurological disorders. Future Neurology 2012. [DOI: 10.2217/fnl.12.57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Bar-Nur
- Stem Cell Unit, Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram 91904, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bar-Nur O, Caspi I, Benvenisty N. Molecular analysis of FMR1 reactivation in fragile-X induced pluripotent stem cells and their neuronal derivatives. J Mol Cell Biol 2012; 4:180-3. [PMID: 22430918 DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjs007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
21
|
Bar-Nur O, Russ HA, Efrat S, Benvenisty N. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet beta cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 9:17-23. [PMID: 21726830 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 438] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2011] [Revised: 05/05/2011] [Accepted: 06/10/2011] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSCs) appear to be highly similar to human embryonic stem cells (HESCs). Using two genetic lineage-tracing systems, we demonstrate the generation of iPSC lines from human pancreatic islet beta cells. These reprogrammed cells acquired markers of pluripotent cells and differentiated into the three embryonic germ layers. However, the beta cell-derived iPSCs (BiPSCs) maintained open chromatin structure at key beta-cell genes, together with a unique DNA methylation signature that distinguishes them from other PSCs. BiPSCs also demonstrated an increased ability to differentiate into insulin-producing cells both in vitro and in vivo, compared with ESCs and isogenic non-beta iPSCs. Our results suggest that the epigenetic memory may predispose BiPSCs to differentiate more readily into insulin producing cells. These findings demonstrate that HiPSC phenotype may be influenced by their cells of origin, and suggest that their skewed differentiation potential may be advantageous for cell replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Bar-Nur
- Stem Cell Unit, Department of Genetics, Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ron-Bigger S, Bar-Nur O, Isaac S, Bocker M, Lyko F, Eden A. Aberrant epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes is reversed by direct reprogramming. Stem Cells 2011; 28:1349-54. [PMID: 20572015 DOI: 10.1002/stem.468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Direct reprogramming procedures reset the epigenetic memory of cells and convert differentiated somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells. In addition to epigenetic memory of cell identity, which is established during development, somatic cells can accumulate abnormal epigenetic changes that can contribute to pathological conditions. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation and epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) are now recognized as an important mechanism in tumor initiation and progression. Here, we have studied the fate of the silenced TSGs p16(CDKN2A) during direct reprogramming. We find that following reprogramming, p16 expression is restored and is stably maintained even when cells are induced to differentiate. Large-scale methylation profiling of donor cells identified aberrant methylation at hundreds of additional sites. Methylation at many, but not all these sites was reversed following reprogramming. Our results suggest that reprogramming approaches may be applied to repair the epigenetic lesions associated with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shulamit Ron-Bigger
- Department of Cell, Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Urbach A, Bar-Nur O, Daley GQ, Benvenisty N. Differential modeling of fragile X syndrome by human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6:407-11. [PMID: 20452313 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 291] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2009] [Revised: 02/15/2010] [Accepted: 04/13/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Achia Urbach
- Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pick M, Stelzer Y, Bar-Nur O, Mayshar Y, Eden A, Benvenisty N. Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 2010; 27:2686-90. [PMID: 19711451 DOI: 10.1002/stem.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon whereby genes are expressed in a monoallelic manner, which is inherited either maternally or paternally. Expression of imprinted genes has been examined in human embryonic stem (ES) cells, and the cells show a substantial degree of genomic imprinting stability. Recently, human somatic cells were reprogrammed to a pluripotent state using various defined factors. These induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are thought to have a great potential for studying genetic diseases and to be a source of patient-specific stem cells. Thus, studying the expression of imprinted genes in these cells is important. We examined the allelic expression of various imprinted genes in several iPS cell lines and found polymorphisms in four genes. After analyzing parent-specific expression of these genes, we observed overall normal monoallelic expression in the iPS cell lines. However, we found biallelic expression of the H19 gene in one iPS cell line and biallelic expression of the KCNQ10T1 gene in another iPS cell line. We further analyzed the DNA methylation levels of the promoter region of the H19 gene and found that the cell line that showed biallelic expression had undergone extensive DNA demethylation. Additionally we studied the imprinting gene expression pattern of multiple human iPS cell lines via DNA microarray analyses and divided the pattern of expression into three groups: (a) genes that showed significantly stable levels of expression in iPS cells, (b) genes that showed a substantial degree of variability in expression in both human ES and iPS cells, and (c) genes that showed aberrant expression levels in some human iPS cell lines, as compared with human ES cells. In general, iPS cells have a rather stable expression of their imprinted genes. However, we found a significant number of cell lines with abnormal expression of imprinted genes, and thus we believe that imprinted genes should be examined for each cell line if it is to be used for studying genetic diseases or for the purpose of regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie Pick
- Stem Cell Unit, Department of Genetics, The Hebrew University, Edmund Safra Campus - Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Blum B, Bar-Nur O, Golan-Lev T, Benvenisty N. The anti-apoptotic gene survivin contributes to teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27:281-7. [PMID: 19252483 DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2008] [Accepted: 01/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Teratomas derived from human embryonic stem (hES) cells are unique among oncogenic phenomena as they are polyclonal and develop from apparently normal cells. A deeper understanding of this process should aid in the development of safer cell therapies and may help elucidate the basic principles of tumor initiation. We find that transplantation of diploid hES cells from four independent cell lines generates benign teratomas with no sign of malignancy or persisting embryonal carcinoma-like cells. In contrast, mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells from four cell lines consistently generate malignant teratocarcinomas. Global gene expression analysis shows that survivin (BIRC5), an anti-apoptotic oncofetal gene, is highly expressed in hES cells and teratomas but not in embryoid bodies. Genetic and pharmacological ablation of survivin induces apoptosis in hES cells and in teratomas both in vitro and in vivo. We suggest that continued expression of survivin upon differentiation in vivo may contribute to teratoma formation by hES cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barak Blum
- Stem Cell Unit, Department of Genetics, The Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|