Subcellular localization of the small GTPase Rab5a in resting and stimulated human neutrophils

The evidence that small GTPases of the Rab family are regulators of vesicle traffic which can influence various cell functions prompted us to investigate the potential role of one of these proteins, Rab5a, in human neutrophils. In this paper we show that a large amount of Rab5a is present in the cytosol of peripheral blood mature neutrophils. The remaining protein was found to be membrane and azurophilic granule associated. Upon neutrophil challenge with PMA for 10 min the amount of membrane-associated Rab5a was upregulated while the cytosolic content of the protein concomitantly decreased. These findings support the hypothesis that Rab5a could be involved in the mechanism of neutrophil activation by modulating the rate of endocytosis and/or vesicle fusion.

Identification of elastase in human eosinophils: immunolocalization, isolation, and partial characterization

Although an elastolytic activity in eosinophil-rich cell fractions from mice has been reported, this enzyme has not been purified and characterized as yet in any mammalian species. Eosinophilic elastase was isolated from human eosinophil fragments (cytosomes) obtained from normal and eosinophilic subjects. The enzyme was purified to apparent electrophoretic homogeneity by fast protein liquid chromatography. The enzyme shows the same physical properties of the major elastase isoenzyme of human neutrophils. In addition, like monocyte elastase, it reacts with a monoclonal antibody against human neutrophil elastase. The biochemical similarities observed between the above-mentioned enzymes and the immunolocalization findings strongly support the idea that human eosinophils and neutrophils contain the same enzyme activity. Eosinophils show immunoreactive material in both types of dense cytoplasmic granules. This observation supports the current hypothesis that the different types of eosinophilic granules represent successive morphological stages of maturation.

Protective and inactivating effects of neutrophil myeloperoxidase on C1q activity

This study investigated the interaction between neutrophil myeloperoxidase (MPO) and the C1q component of the complement system. Using a dot-spot assay, MPO was found to bind to C1q in a dose-dependent manner. The specificity of this reaction was proved by the inhibitory effect of F(ab')2 antibodies to C1q and by the inability of MPO to bind to C1r, C1s and IgG. The interaction between MPO and C1q did not influence the enzymatic activity of the peroxidase but resulted in a more stable C1q as assessed by hemolytic assay for C1q. The protective effect of MPO on C1q did not require the presence of H2O2 in the reaction mixture nor was it inhibited by sodium azide, whereas it was abolished by heating the peroxidase. Lactoferrin and lysozyme, unlike MPO, were ineffective in protecting C1q from functional decay. Addition of H2O2 and chloride to MPO and C1q led to a complete inactivation of C1q, which could not be induced by H2O2 alone. The hypochlorite, which is known to be generated during the reaction of MPO with H2O2 and chloride, exhibited a similar inactivating effect on C1q, which was prevented by an external source of methionine.

Uptake of human eosinophil peroxidase and myeloperoxidase by cells involved in the inflammatory process

We have recently shown that human neutrophils bind and internalize human eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) but not myeloperoxidase (MPO). In the present work, we studied the interactions of human EPO and MPO with other cells that may be involved in the inflammatory process, i.e., lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. The results indicate that EPO is bound by all the cell types considered, but is efficiently internalized only by lymphocytes, monocytes, and endothelial cells. Conversely, MPO binds appreciably only to fibroblasts and endothelial cells, although with a lower affinity than EPO, but its internalization by any of the cell types studied is hardly detectable. Furthermore, both peroxidases bind strongly to collagen fibers, whereas only EPO binds to elastin. The results suggest that EPO, owing to its high cytophilia, exerts its biological activity close to the site at which it is released from the eosinophil.