Germline variants and phenotypic spectrum in a Canadian cohort of individuals with diffuse gastric cancer

Background

CDH1 pathogenic variants (pvs) cause most cases of inherited diffuse gastric cancer (dgc), but have low detection rates and vary geographically. In the present study, we examined hereditary causes of dgc in patients in Ontario.

Methods

CDH1 testing through single-site or multi-gene panels was conducted for patients with dgc meeting the 2015 International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (igclc) criteria, or with isolated dgc at less than 50 years of age, or with a strong family history of cancer identified at the Zane Cohen Centre (zcc). All CDH1-positive patients at zcc, regardless of cancer history, were summarized.

Results

In 15 of 85 patients with dgc (17.6%), a pv or likely pv was identified through CDH1 single-site (n = 43) or multi-gene panel (n = 42) testing. The detection rate was 9.4% overall (8 of 85) and 11% using igclc criteria (7 of 65). No CDH1 pvs were identified in patients with isolated dgc at less than 40 years of age, but 1 pv was identified in a patient with isolated dgc at less than 50 years of age. Multi-gene panels identified 9 pvs (21.4%), including CDH1, STK11, ATM, BRCA2, MLH1, and MSH2. Review of 81 CDH1 carriers identified 10% with dgc (median age: 48 years; range: 38-59 years); 41% were unaffected (median age: 53 years; range: 26-89 years). Observed malignancies other than dgc or lobular breast cancer (lbc) included colorectal, gynecologic, kidney or bladder, prostate, testicular, and ductal breast cancers. Lobular-breast cancer was seen only in 3 families.

Conclusions

In Ontario, the detection rate of CDH1 pvs in patients with dgc was low: no pvs were identified in patients with isolated dgc at less than 40 years of age, and 1 was identified in a patient with isolated dgc at less than 50 years of age. Isolated lbc with no dgc was observed in CDH1-positive families, as were pathology-confirmed nondgc or non-lbc malignancies, which had not previously been reported. Given a phenotype that overlaps with other hereditary conditions, multi-gene panels are recommended for all patients with dgc at less than 50 years of age and for those meeting igclc criteria.

Gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS): a new autosomal dominant syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was the clinical and pathological characterisation of a new autosomal dominant gastric polyposis syndrome, gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach (GAPPS).

METHODS

Case series were examined, documenting GAPPS in three families from Australia, the USA and Canada. The affected families were identified through referral to centralised clinical genetics centres.

RESULTS

The report identifies the clinical and pathological features of this syndrome, including the predominant dysplastic fundic gland polyp histology, the exclusive involvement of the gastric body and fundus, the apparent inverse association with current Helicobacter pylori infection and the autosomal dominant mode of inheritance.

CONCLUSIONS

GAPPS is a unique gastric polyposis syndrome with a significant risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. It is characterised by the autosomal dominant transmission of fundic gland polyposis, including areas of dysplasia or intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma, restricted to the proximal stomach, and with no evidence of colorectal or duodenal polyposis or other heritable gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.

Germline mutations in CDH1 are infrequent in women with early-onset or familial lobular breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Germline mutations in CDH1 are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer; lobular breast cancer also occurs excessively in families with such condition.

METHOD

To determine if CDH1 is a susceptibility gene for lobular breast cancer in women without a family history of diffuse gastric cancer, germline DNA was analysed for the presence of CDH1 mutations in 318 women with lobular breast cancer who were diagnosed before the age of 45 years or had a family history of breast cancer and were not known, or known not, to be carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Cases were ascertained through breast cancer registries and high-risk cancer genetic clinics (Breast Cancer Family Registry, the kConFab and a consortium of breast cancer genetics clinics in the United States and Spain). Additionally, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification was performed for 134 cases to detect large deletions.

RESULTS

No truncating mutations and no large deletions were detected. Six non-synonymous variants were found in seven families. Four (4/318 or 1.3%) are considered to be potentially pathogenic through in vitro and in silico analysis.

CONCLUSION

Potentially pathogenic germline CDH1 mutations in women with early-onset or familial lobular breast cancer are at most infrequent.

Prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC): the Newfoundland experience with 23 patients

BACKGROUND

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) results from truncating mutations of the CDH1 (E-cadherin) gene. It is an autosomal dominant cancer susceptibility syndrome with a lifetime risk of diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) of 60-80%, with a mean age of onset of 37 years. There exists no adequate screening test for DGC. Early intramucosal diffuse/signet-ring cell carcinomas have been found in prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG) specimens following normal preoperative endoscopy. Total gastrectomy has been advocated on a prophylactic basis. The aim of this study was to report our experience with PTG in 23 patients from the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador. This is the largest series worldwide.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing PTG for HDGC was performed. All patients were confirmed to have a truncating mutation of the CDH1 gene.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients underwent PTG between February 2006 and November 2008. Major complications were found in 4/23 patients (17%), with no mortality. Two of 23 patients (9%) had positive mucosal biopsies on preoperative EGD. Twenty-two of 23 patients (96%) had evidence of diffuse/signet-ring carcinoma on final standardized pathological evaluation. Therefore, 21/23 (91%) were not picked up by preoperative EGD screening.

CONCLUSIONS

PTG can be performed in patients with HDGC with a low rate of serious complications. Methods of reconstruction incorporating a pouch reservoir and preservation of the postgastric branches of the vagus nerves need to be explored. More refined penetrance estimates, effective screening protocols, and long-term psychological and functional outcomes following PTG require organized multicenter collaborative efforts.

THE ASSOCIATION OF LOBULAR BREAST CANCER WITH GERMLINE MUTATIONS OF CDH1

Background: CDH1 encodes the cell-cell adhesion molecule, E-cadherin, for which loss of expression facilitates the infiltrative and metastatic potential of cancers. Germline mutations in CDH1 are associated with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC), and in this setting female carriers have been estimated to have a 39-50% risk of lobular breast cancer (LBC) by age 80 years. Aim: To determine the frequency of CDH1 germline mutations inindividuals with early-onset LBC or those with LBC and a family history of multiple breast cancers but no gastric cancers. Methods: Germline DNA analysis of CDH1 in women with LBC, for whom germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been excluded, who have been (1) diagnosed before the age of 45 years or (2) diagnosed at any age and have a family history of breast cancer. Results: Analysis of 194 LBC cases has thus far revealed two novel missense mutations predicted to affect protein function. Functional assays to assess their pathogenicity along with germline analyses of the remaining 200 cases are currently underway. Several unreported silent changes have also been identified and will be measured in a case- control sample to assess whether they are associated with LBC risk. Conclusion: Germline CDH1 mutations may cause a small proportion of familial and early onset LBC.

Germline E-cadherin mutations in familial lobular breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The cell surface glycoprotein E-cadherin (CDH1) is a key regulator of adhesive properties in epithelial cells. Germline mutations in CDH1 are well established as the defects underlying hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome, and an increased risk of lobular breast cancer (LBC) has been described in HDGC kindreds. However, germline CDH1 mutations have not been described in patients with LBC in non-HDGC families. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of germline CDH1 mutations in patients with LBC with early onset disease or family histories of breast cancer without DGC.

METHODS

Germline DNA was analysed in 23 women with invasive lobular or mixed ductal and lobular breast cancers who had at least one close relative with breast cancer or had themselves been diagnosed before the age of 45 years, had tested negative for a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, and reported no personal or family history of diffuse gastric cancer. The full coding sequence of CDH1 including splice junctions was amplified using PCR and screened for mutations using DHPLC and sequencing.

RESULTS

A novel germline CDH1 truncating mutation in the extracellular portion of the protein (517insA) was identified in one woman who had LBC at the age of 42 years and a first degree relative with invasive LBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Germline CDH1 mutations can be associated with invasive LBC in the absence of diffuse gastric cancer. The finding, if confirmed, may have implications for management of individuals at risk for this breast cancer subtype. Clarification of the cancer risks in the syndrome is essential.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: Natural history, pathology, screening limitations, and prophylactic total gastrectomy in CDH1 mutation carriers

4500

Background: Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a potentially fatal disease that occurs due to mutations in the E- cadherin (CDH1) gene, as discovered in 1998. Its penetrance ranges between 70–80%. Its morbidity and mortality can be altered favorably through genetic counseling, germline mutation testing, and highly-targeted management that includes prophylactic total gastrectomy. Lobular breast cancer has been identified as an integral lesion in HDGC. Methods: This international collaborative group on HDGC is comprised of 56 mutation-positive families, which is the world’s largest resource of such families. Cancer diagnoses were verified with pathology slides/tissue block review when possible, or reports. Genetic counseling covering the pros and cons of mutation testing, screening and its limitations, and the option of prophylactic total gastrectomy was provided. Results: Findings on 56 HDGC mutation-positive families show carrier testing to have been performed on 267 individuals, of which 123 were CDH1 mutation positive. Prophylactic gastrectomies were performed on 14 families involving 50 individuals. Occult cancer was diagnosed in 31 (31/39=79.5%; results are pending on the remaining 11), based upon pathology and verbal reports. Five individuals underwent prophylactic gastrectomy prior to genetic counseling, 3 of whom later tested negative for mutations. In one of these remarkable HDGC families, 11 first cousins who tested positive for the CDH1 mutation underwent prophylactic total gastrectomy. On a post-surgery questionnaire, they each stated that the decision for the prophylactic procedure was the “right one” for them. In each case, a parent had died of HDGC sequelae, adding to the cousins’ acceptance of DNA testing and surgery. They considered their post-operative nutritional programs to have been acceptable. Conclusion: HDGC and its life-threatening sequelae were significantly ameliorated in CDH1 mutation carriers through total prophylactic gastrectomy in patients at enormous lifetime risk for HDGC. Decision for mutation testing and surgery may be more acceptable through intensive education in concert with a compassionate management team.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Germline E-cadherin mutations in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: assessment of 42 new families and review of genetic screening criteria

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the E-cadherin (CDH1) gene are a well documented cause of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). Development of evidence based guidelines for CDH1 screening for HDGC have been complicated by its rarity, variable penetrance, and lack of founder mutations.

METHODS

Forty three new gastric cancer (GC) families were ascertained from multiple sources. In 42 of these families at least one gastric cancer was pathologically confirmed to be a diffuse gastric cancer (DGC); the other family had intestinal type gastric cancers. Screening of the entire coding region of the CDH1 gene and all intron/exon boundaries was performed by bi-directional sequencing.

RESULTS

Novel mutations were found in 13 of the 42 DGC families (31% overall). Twelve of these mutations occur among the 25 families with multiple cases of gastric cancer and with pathologic confirmation of diffuse gastric cancer phenotype in at least one individual under the age of 50 years. The mutations found include small insertions and deletions, splice site mutations, and three non-conservative amino acid substitutions (A298T, W409R, and R732Q). All three missense mutations conferred loss of E-cadherin function in in vitro assays. Multiple cases of breast cancers including pathologically confirmed lobular breast cancers were observed both in mutation positive and negative families.

CONCLUSION

Germline truncating CDH1 mutations are found in 48% of families with multiple cases of gastric cancer and at least one documented case of DGC in an individual under 50 years of age. We recommend that these criteria be used for selecting families for CDH1 mutational analysis.

Inherited predisposition to pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role of family history and germ-line p16, BRCA1, and BRCA2 mutations

Susceptibility to pancreatic adenocarcinoma appears to be linked to germ-line mutations in genes causing various familial cancer syndromes. The objectives of this study were to estimate the proportion of unselected pancreatic cancer patients belonging to hereditary cancer syndrome families and to determine the frequency ofp16, BRCA1, BRCA2, hMSH2, and hMLH1 germ-line mutations in patients with a personal or family history of cancer. The study population consisted of 102 patients with histologically verified pancreatic adenocarcinoma, unselected for age, sex, family history, or ethnic origin. Patients completed a family history questionnaire and provided blood for mutation analysis. Three-generation pedigrees were constructed and classified as high risk/familial, intermediate risk/ familial, intermediate risk/nonfamilial, or low risk according to defined criteria. High- and intermediate-risk cases were analyzed for germ-line mutations using a combination of methods. Thirty-eight of 102 (37%) patients were characterized as high or intermediate risk, and the remainder were classified as low risk. Germ-line mutations were identified in five (13%) of these cases [one in p16 (I49S); one in BRCA1 (5382 insC); and three in BRCA2 (6174delT)]. The BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified in Ashkenazi Jewish patients. Four of the mutation carriers had strong family histories of the syndromes associated with the mutated genes. No mutations were identified in patients in whom the sole risk factor was a family history of pancreatic cancer, and only one mutation was found among patients with early-onset disease. We conclude that known causes of genetic predisposition are an important risk factor in a small proportion of pancreatic cancer patients, especially if associated with a strong family history of syndromes associated with the disease. The lack of detectable germ-line mutations in most high- and intermediate-risk cases suggests that there are probably additional, as yet unidentified genes predisposing to this disease.

Total anonychia congenita and microcephaly with normal intelligence: a new autosomal-recessive syndrome?

We report on 3 sibs (2 boys and a girl) with a previously apparently unrecognized combination of anonychia congenita and microcephaly with normal intelligence. The shape of the head is normal. Other anomalies include clinodactyly of the fifth fingers and bilateral single transverse palmar creases. Skeletal survey was normal in the 2 older children. These children and their first-cousin Iranian parents have widely spaced teeth. The children's first cousin also has total anonychia congenita and apparently small head. We review anonychia congenita, and conclude that the presently reported family with a "new autosomal-recessive disorder" provides further evidence of the heterogeneity of this condition.

Adams Oliver syndrome: a family with extreme variability in clinical expression

We describe a mother and her 3 children with variable scalp defects and limb defects consistent with a diagnosis of Adams Oliver syndrome also presenting with additional anomalies including congenital heart disease, microcephaly, epilepsy, mental retardation, arrhinencephaly, hydrocephaly, anatomic bronchial anomalies, and renal anomalies. The clinical variation between the individuals is more pronounced than in previously reported families.

Lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome: evidence for lower limb involvement and severe congenital renal anomalies

We describe a 3-generation family with lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome (LADD). In addition to the well described abnormalities of ears, teeth, lacrimal apparatus and digits, the patients exhibit several previously undescribed anomalies, including minor facial anomalies (broad forehead, telecanthus, bulbous nasal tip, full jaw, ptosis and flared nostrils), involvement of the first and second toes, and congenital renal disease causing death in the neonatal period in 2 cases.