Limited patient adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection in an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency syndrome type 1 (HIV-1) infection is essential to sustain viral suppression and prevent drug resistance. We investigated adherence to HAART among patients in a clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Patients receiving HAART had their plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors or nevirapine measured and completed a questionnaire on adherence. We determined the percentage of patients who reported taking all antiretroviral medication on time and according to dietary instructions in the past week. Drug exposure was compared between patients reporting deviation from their regimen and fully adherent patients. Among patients who received HAART for at least 24 weeks, we assessed the association between adherence and virologic outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 224 of 261 eligible patients completed a questionnaire. Forty-seven percent reported taking all antiretroviral medication on time and according to dietary instructions. Patients who reported deviation from their regimen showed lower drug exposure compared with fully adherent patients (median concentration ratio, 0.81 vs 1.07; P =.001). Among those receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks, patients reporting deviation from their regimen were less likely to have plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 500 copies/mL (adjusted odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-11.6) compared with fully adherent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only half of the patients took all antiretroviral medication in accordance with time and dietary instructions in the preceding week. Deviation from the antiretroviral regimen was associated with decreased drug exposure and a decreased likelihood of having suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA loads. Patient adherence should remain a prime concern in the management of HIV-1 infection.

Analysis of variation in plasma concentrations of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 in HIV-positive patients

OBJECTIVE

To characterize sources of variation in plasma concentrations of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 and to evaluate the use of therapeutic drug monitoring for nelfinavir treatment.

METHODS

Plasma samples and patient's characteristics were obtained from outpatient clinic. Differences between groups of patients were studied by comparing the observed plasma concentrations with the corresponding concentration on a pharmacokinetic population curve based on median plasma levels.

RESULTS

Plasma samples (618) were available from 355 patients taking 1250 mg nelfinavir twice daily. The median ratio between M8 and nelfinavir concentrations was 0.29. This ratio appeared to be independent of the time after ingestion. Statistically significantly lower M8 concentrations were found in Black and Asian patients, or when comedication with CYP3A4 inducers was used. Coadministration of CYP2C19 inhibitors, such as omeprazole, decreased the median M8/nelfinavir ratio. Nevertheless, nelfinavir concentrations and summed concentrations of nelfinavir and M8 were only marginally affected in these patients. Diarrhoea was identified as a cause for lower nelfinavir concentrations, without changing the M8/nelfinavir ratio. In a number of patients with suspected therapy failure or intoxication, abnormal nelfinavir plasma concentrations were found. Dose adjustments based on nelfinavir plasma levels were helpful in a number of patients.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the total concentration of nelfinavir and M8 together is not significantly influenced when variation in M8 levels occurs. Consequently, measuring M8 concentrations in addition to nelfinavir concentrations is not required for the purpose of therapeutic drug monitoring for this drug.

Pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitor indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children as part of a prospective, open, uncontrolled, multicenter study in The Netherlands. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children were monitored over 6 months of treatment with zidovudine (120 mg/m(2) every 8 h [q8h]), lamivudine (4 mg/kg of body weight q12h), and indinavir (33mg/kg of metabolic weight [MW] q8h). Four weeks after the start of treatment, the steady-state pharmacokinetics of indinavir were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. If patients had an indinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of below 10 or above 30 mg/liter. h, a dose increase or a dose reduction was made and pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated 4 weeks later. Nineteen patients started with the dose of 33 mg/kg of MW q8h. The median AUC (range) was 10.5 (2.8 to 51.0) mg/liter. h. The median AUC (range) in 17 children treated with 50 mg/kg of MW q8h was 20.6 (4.1 to 38.7) mg/liter. h. Finally, five patients had a dose increase to 67 mg/kg of MW q8h, resulting in a median AUC (range) of 36.6 (27.2 to 80.0) mg/liter. h. After 6 months of treatment, there were 11 children with an AUC of below 20 mg/liter. h, of whom 5 (45%) had a detectable viral load, while this was the case in none of the 11 children with an AUC of higher than 20 mg/liter. h. We conclude that the optimal dose of indinavir in children to obtain drug exposure similar to that observed in adult patients is 50 mg/kg of MW q8h, which approximates 600 mg/m(2) q8h. It would even be better to adjust the indinavir dose based on an AUC of greater than 20 mg/liter. h.

A retrospective, cohort-based survey of patients using twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir combinations: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens

DESIGN

A cohort-based survey of HIV-infected patients who either used indinavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg twice daily or indinavir 400 mg + ritonavir 400 mg twice daily.

METHODS

Data were extracted from a database of samples sent to our laboratory for measurement of indinavir + ritonavir plasma concentrations. Patient characteristics, safety, and efficacy measurements were collected by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

100 Patients using 800-mg indinavir + 100-mg ritonavir twice daily and 32 patients using 400-mg indinavir + 400-mg ritonavir twice daily were eligible. Median peak and trough concentrations of indinavir were 6.8 and 0.77 mg/L in the 800/100 group and 2.6 and 0.45 mg/L in the 400/400 group. The most frequently found side effects were nausea and vomiting, which occurred in 22.1% and 34.9% of the patients in the 800/100 and the 400/400 groups, respectively. Viral load data were analyzed for patients who switched from 800-mg indinavir three times daily to one of the indinavir + ritonavir twice daily regimens. At the time of switch 63% (800/100 group) and 60% (400/400 group) had an undetectable viral load and this increased to 77% and 70%, respectively, during follow-up. Patients who switched to the 400/400 group discontinued treatment more frequently than patients who switched to the 800/100 group (70% vs. 26%, p =.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Indinavir + ritonavir regimens show improved pharmacokinetic properties, allowing twice-daily dosing with food. Clinical data suggest that safety and efficacy is at least as good as with indinavir three-times-daily regimens without ritonavir. Prospective, comparative trials are needed to properly assess the role in HIV therapy of these twice-daily indinavir + ritonavir regimens.

Dose-finding study of a once-daily indinavir/ritonavir regimen

In antiretroviral therapy, to improve compliance the need is increasing to develop regimens that combine potency and safety with convenient dosing. The objective of our study was to find a once-daily dosing regimen of a HIV-protease inhibitor, indinavir (IDV), by combining it with ritonavir (RTV). In the study, 12 healthy volunteers took a single IDV dose of 800 mg on day 1. Plasma and urine sampling was done for 12 hours. From day 2 to day 21, participants took RTV liquid 200 mg (group A) or 400 mg (group B) once daily. Repeated pharmacokinetic sampling was performed over the course of 24 hours, after single doses of indinavir 400 mg (day 15), 800 mg (day 18), and 1200 mg (day 21). The best dosage regimen in this pharmacokinetic study was selected based on efficacy and tolerability criteria. The study comprised 10 male and 2 female healthy volunteers, mean age, 25 years (range, 18-50 years), mean weight, 70 kg (range, 52-83 kg). One male participant discontinued on day 8 due to influenza. All other participants completed the study without the occurrence of serious adverse events. RTV inhibited indinavir plasma clearance by 51% to 70%, leading to increased and prolonged IDV exposure. Renal clearance was influenced by the addition of RTV and dosage increments of IDV. The efficacy criterion was best fulfilled by 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, whereas this combination performed most poorly on tolerability criteria. Based on the single dose data, a once-daily regimen of IDV with a low dose of RTV is possible. The best dosage regimen to start with among those studied here appears to be 1200 mg IDV/400 mg RTV, which could be decreased at steady state to 800 IDV/400 RTV or 1200 IDV/200 RTV if toxicity occurs. Steady-state pharmacokinetic data of once-daily IDV/RTV regimens in HIV-infected patients are warranted.

Saliva as a specimen for monitoring compliance but not for predicting plasma concentrations in patients with HIV treated with indinavir

The presence of the HIV-protease inhibitor indinavir in saliva was analyzed to investigate whether salivary indinavir concentrations are applicable to monitor compliance and/or predict plasma indinavir levels. Fourteen HIV-infected outpatients treated with indinavir and 24 healthy volunteers who ingested a single dose of indinavir were included. Paired plasma and citric-acid-stimulated saliva samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations showed a high correlation (r = 0.85, p < 0.01) with corresponding plasma levels. The median saliva/plasma ratio was 65% (P25 50%; P75 94%). The ratios were independent of the plasma concentration; however, a relation with time after ingestion was seen. The unbound fraction of indinavir in plasma was not significantly correlated with the saliva/plasma ratio after stimulated saliva collection, in contrast with a subset of nonstimulated saliva from healthy volunteers, where we did find a significant correlation. Although stimulated salivary indinavir concentrations are highly correlated with plasma concentrations, it is not possible to predict plasma indinavir levels by the salivary concentrations for purposes of therapeutic drug monitoring, due to large interindividual and intraindividual variation. Nevertheless, monitoring compliance by measuring the presence of indinavir in saliva is possible: ingestion of indinavir can be assessed with a sensitivity of 84.8% in the whole dosing interval or with 98.8% between 1 and 6 hours after the last dose, which is comparable with plasma.

Development of an indinavir oral liquid for children

An indinavir oral liquid was developed and studied. Several oral liquids containing indinavir were prepared and taste tested in eight healthy volunteers. Physical and chemical stability over two weeks were examined, and a randomized, two-way-crossover, single-dose bioequivalence trial was performed in 12 healthy male volunteers. Indinavir 800 mg was given as two 400-mg indinavir capsules (Crixivan) on day 1 and as 80 mL of the indinavir liquid on day 2, or vice versa. A standard breakfast and lunch were given at fixed times, and blood and urine samples were collected at various intervals up to eight hours. The log-transformed area under the concentration-versus-time curve from zero to eight hours (AUC0-8) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for the liquid versus the capsules were compared by using a 90% confidence interval (CI) test (limits, 80-125%), and the time to Cmax (tmax) was compared by using the nonparametric sign test. The liquid selected had an acceptable taste, contained indinavir 10 mg/mL, and was chemically stable for two weeks at 4 degrees C. The 90% CI for the AUC ratio (liquid versus capsules) was 92-99% (mean, 95%); for the Cmax ratio it was 95-106% (mean, 100%). There was no significant difference in tmax between the liquid and capsules. An oral liquid formulation of indinavir was developed that had an acceptable taste, was chemically stable, and was bioequivalent to the commercially available capsule.

Carbamazepine--indinavir interaction causes antiretroviral therapy failure

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of antiretroviral therapy failure caused by an interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir.

CASE SUMMARY

A 48-year-old HIV-positive white man was treated with antiretroviral triple therapy, consisting of indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. His HIV-RNA (viral load) became undetectable (<400 copies/mL) less than two months after this therapy was started; this was confirmed one month later. Shortly after the start of antiretroviral therapy, the patient developed herpes zoster, which was treated with famciclovir. Tramadol was initially prescribed for postherpetic neuralgia; however, this was substituted with carbamazepine due to insufficient analgesic effect. Indinavir plasma concentrations decreased substantially during carbamazepine therapy. Carbamazepine was stopped after 2.5 months and, two weeks later, the HIV-RNA was detectable (6 x 103 copies/mL). Resistance for lamivudine was observed in that blood sample; resistance for zidovudine might have been present, and resistance to indinavir was not detected. A few months later, a further increase of the HIV-RNA occurred (300 x 103 copies/mL), after which the therapy was switched to a new antiretroviral regimen containing nevirapine, didanosine, and stavudine.

DISCUSSION

Physicians may prescribe carbamazepine for HIV-infected patients to treat seizures or postherpetic neuralgia, which are complications of opportunistic infections such as herpes zoster or toxoplasmosis. Carbamazepine is a potent enzyme inducer, predominantly of the CYP3A enzyme system, while HIV-protease inhibitors such as indinavir are substrates for and inhibitors of CYP3A. Therefore, an interaction between these drugs could be expected. A low dose of carbamazepine (200 mg/d) and the usual dose of indinavir (800 mg q8h) in our patient resulted in carbamazepine concentrations within the therapeutic range for epilepsy treatment; indinavir concentrations dropped substantially. The virologic, resistance, and plasma drug concentration data, as well as the chronology of events, are highly indicative of antiretroviral treatment failure due to the interaction between carbamazepine and indinavir.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of carbamazepine and indinavir may cause failure of antiretroviral therapy due to insufficient indinavir plasma concentrations. Drugs other than carbamazepine should be considered to prevent this interaction. Amitriptyline or gabapentin are alternatives for postherpetic neuralgia; valproic acid or lamotrigine are alternatives for seizures. When alternate drug therapy is not possible, dosage adjustments, therapeutic drug monitoring, and careful clinical observation may help reduce adverse clinical consequences.

Low plasma concentrations of indinavir are related to virological treatment failure in HIV-1-infected patients on indinavir-containing triple therapy

All human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients who started to use indinavir (800 mg three times a day) as part of their triple drug regimen were included in a study to determine the importance of low plasma concentrations of indinavir as a cause of virological treatment failure. The indinavir concentration and a number of patient characteristics at baseline were tested as risk factors for virological treatment failure (defined as a viral load above 200 copies/ml after 24 weeks of treatment) in univariate and multivariate analyses; 65 patients were included. Virological treatment failure occurred in 36.9% of the patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a low plasma concentration of indinavir (odds ratio 0.1), a high viral load at baseline (odds ratio 2.6) and pretreatment with another protease inhibitor (odds ratio 10.0) were independent factors related to virological treatment failure. Monitoring of indinavir plasma concentrations may be an important tool for the optimization of triple drug combination therapy.

Simultaneous determination of the HIV-protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and ritonavir in human plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography

A sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of the four licensed HIV-protease inhibitors indinavir, nelfinavir, saquinavir and ritonavir. An aliquot of 500 microl plasma, spiked with internal standard, was extracted with 0.5 ml 0.1 M NH4OH and 5 ml methyl tert.-butyl ether. After evaporating, the residue was dissolved in eluent consisting of acetonitrile-50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.63 (40:60, v/v). Subsequently, the eluent was washed with hexane. Chromatography was performed using a C18 reversed-phase column and gradient elution with a linear increase of acetonitrile from 36 to 66%. Ultraviolet detection at 215 nm was used. Linearity of the method was obtained in the concentration range of 45-30 000 ng/ml for all four analytes. The method was validated extensively and stability tests under various conditions were performed. The assay is now in use to analyse plasma samples from patients treated with (combinations of) HIV-protease inhibitors.