Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine: An Alternative Schedule in Elderly and Patients PS2 With Local/Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC Not Oncogene-addicted

BACKGROUND

The MILES and ELVIS studies showed that vinorelbine is one of the best options for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer (NSCLC). Oral vinorelbine at standard schedule (60-80 mg/m²/weekly) has good activity in terms of response rates and progression-free survival. In recent years, a metronomic schedule of oral vinorelbine (40-50 mg/m² three times a week, continuously) has been studied in phase II trials, especially in unfit and elderly patients. In the MOVE trial metronomic oral vinorelbine had a clinical benefit [partial response (PR)+stable disease (SD) >12 weeks] in 58.1% of patients with mild toxicity. On this basis, in 2017 we started a phase II study with metronomic oral vinorelbine in elderly (over 70 years) or unfit [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 2] patients with locally/advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Primary aims were clinical benefit (PR+SD ≥6 months) and toxicity; secondary aims were progression-free survival and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 25 patients entered the study: 11 with local/advanced and 14 with metastatic NSCLC (five squamous and 20 adenocarcinoma). None of the patients had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation, or programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) expression; those with squamous carcinoma did not have PDL1 expression. The median age was 79 (range=44-90) years. The PS was 0 in 12 patients (48%), 1 in four patients (16%) and 2 in nine patients (36%). Oral vinorelbine was administered at 40 mg three times a week continuously.

RESULTS

Clinical benefit was achieved in eight patients (32%). Objective responses were partial response in two patients (8%), stable disease in seven (28%), progressive disease in nine (36%); seven patients were not evaluable for response (28%). Median progression-free survival was 2 months; median overall survival was 4 months but four out of eight patients with clinical benefit were still alive at 18 months. Overall survival at 1 year was 32%. Toxicity was mild: only one patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia, one grade 3 peripheral neuropathy, four grade 2 asthenia, one grade 2 mucositis, and one grade 2 diarrhoea. The dose needed to be reduced to 30 mg/m²/three times a week in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the activity and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine in patients with wild-type local/advanced and metastatic NSCLC unsuitable for treatment with standard i.v. chemotherapy, allowing patients a comfortable home-based therapy, thereby avoiding frequent hospital visits.

Long-term follow-up of a multicenter phase II study of chemo-immunotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC)

536

Background: The combination of low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) and 13-cis retinoic acid (RA) has been shown to decrease vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) of patients with MCC (Anticancer Res, 2005). Moreover, results of various studies have shown that the addition of IL-2 and RA to chemotherapy (CT) increased treatment efficacy, inducing a statistically significant decrease of VEGF, with a low cost.

Methods: Patients with MCC, deemed unresectable, were given the following treatment for two consecutive days (D1-D2): Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m2, Leucovorin (LV), 200 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2, Capecitabine (C) 2,000 mg/m2 (FOCFOX). After 2 weeks Camptothecin, 90 mg/m2 (D1-D2), was administered with the same doses of LV, 5-FU and C (FOCFIRI) as first-line treatment of MCC. Subcutaneous IL-2 1.8 x 106 I.U. and oral RA, 0.5 mg/kg were given 5 days/week. Induction CT was administered for 12 courses, alternating FOCFOX and FOCFIRI, followed by maintenance treatment with the same schedule of IL-2 + RA, for 3 weeks/month. The primary endpoint was the decrease ≥ 30% of VEGF of patients with MCC. Secondary endpoints were the cost of IL-2 and RA with respect to bevacizumab, toxicity, progression- free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: From 08/2000 to 08/2006, fifty-four patients with MCC were entered into the trial. After a median follow up of 64 months (95% CI 62-85%), a statistically significant > 30% (p<0.001) decrease of VEGF was observed. Costs of therapy were $ 304.00/month for IL-2/RA and $ 1,700.00/month for bevacizumab (82% cost reduction). The most common adverse events of CT were grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocythopenia, and anemia in 33%, 9%, 2%, and 2% of patients, respectively, peripheral neuropathy in 10% of patients. Mild cutaneous skin rash, fever and autoimmune reactions were observed in the patients who received the maintenance immunotherapy. PFS at 10 months was 76% (95% CI 62-86). Median PFS was 27.8 months, while median OS was 48.8 months.

Conclusions: These data show that maintenance immunotherapy with low-dose IL-2 and oral RA in patients with MCC has a low toxicity profile, is cost effective, decrease VEGF and seems to improve expected PFS and OS.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pharmacogenetic profiling in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy

The primary end point of the study was the analysis of associations between polymorphisms with putative influence on 5-fluorouracil/irinotecan activity and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Peripheral blood samples from 146 prospectively enrolled patients were used for genotyping polymorphisms in thymidylate synthase (TS), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), excision repair cross-complementation group-1 (ERCC 1) xeroderma pigmentosum group-D (XPD), X-ray cross-complementing-1 (XRCC 1), X-ray cross-complementing-3 (XRCC 3) and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases-A1 (UGT1 A1). TS 3'-UTR 6+/6+ and XRCC3-241 C/C genotypes were associated with adverse PFS. Hazard ratio for PFS achieved 2.89 (95% confidence interval=1.56-5.80; P=0.002) in 30 patients (20%) with both risk genotypes. Risk for Grade III-IV neutropenia was significantly associated with UGT1A1*28 7/7 genotype. These promising findings deserve further investigations and their validation in independent prospective studies.

Urinary excretion of L-carnitine and its short-chain acetyl-L-carnitine in patients undergoing carboplatin treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the anti-cancer drug carboplatin on plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of L-carnitine (LC) and its main ester, acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC), in cancer patients.

METHODS

Plasma and urine concentrations of LC and ALC from 11 patients on carboplatin therapy (1 h intravenous infusion; AUC dose 4.8 +/- 1.1 mg/ml min) in combination with docetaxel, paclitaxel or vinorelbine, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection.

RESULTS

Before carboplatin therapy, the mean +/- SD plasma concentrations of LC and ALC were 47.8 +/- 10.9 and 7.04 +/- 1.04 nmoles/ml, respectively, and remained constant throughout the entire study period. In contrast, urinary excretion of LC and ALC, increased significantly during the chemotherapy from 115 +/- 105 to 480 +/- 348 micromoles/day (P < 0.01) and from 41 +/- 41 to 89 +/- 52 micromoles/day (P < 0.05) for LC and ALC, respectively, subsequently reverting to normal 6 days after the end of chemotherapy. Similarly, the renal clearance of LC and ALC increased substantially during chemotherapy from 1.67 +/- 1.43 to 9.05 +/- 9.52 ml/min (P < 0.05) and from 4.02 +/- 4.51 to 7.97 +/- 5.05 ml/min (P = not significant) for LC and ALC, respectively, reverting to normal 6 days after the end of chemotherapy. Plasma concentrations and urinary excretion of glucose, phosphate and urea nitrogen and creatinine clearance, however, were not affected by carboplatin therapy, indicating no impaired kidney function.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with carboplatin was associated with a marked urinary loss of LC and ALC, most likely due to inhibition of carnitine reabsorption in the kidney.

CEA as a prognostic factor in locally advanced breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

10705

Background: CEA and CA 15.3 are most commonly used to evaluate disease progression in metastatic and recurrent breast cancer. Only few significant studies showed a potential predictive role of CEA and CA 15.3 in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. We evaluated the correlation between tumour markers level at diagnosis and outcome in locally advanced breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer (T > 3.5 cm and T4) at diagnosis entered the study. All patients had to have initial negative staging (chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography, bone scintigraphy and CT scan), whereas all patients who developed metastatic disease in sites which were uncertain during initial staging were excluded. Tumour markers at diagnosis were considered negative if CEA was inferior to 5 ng/ml and CA 15.3 inferior to 35 U/ml. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4–6 cycles with regimens containing Anthracyclines and Taxanes or FEC). Most of patients underwent radical mastectomy followed by sequential radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy and/or hormonotherapy in hormonal responsive patients. Results: Fifty-three patients entered the study. At a median follow up of 73 months, 35 patients were disease free after adjuvant treatment (group A), whereas 18 patients developed metastatic disease during follow-up (group B). At diagnosis 14 patients had CA 15.3 greater than 34 U/ml (7 in group A and 7 in group B), 6 patients had CEA greater than 5 ng/ml (1 in group A and 5 in group B) and 18 patients had CEA or CA 15.3 greater than normal values (7 in group A and 11 in group B).We analyzed DFS and OS in patients with normal (CEA < 5 ng/ml, CA15.3 < 35 U/ml) and elevated (CEA ≥ 5 ng/ml, CA 15.3 ≥ 35 U/ml) tumour markers at diagnosis; DFS (p = 0.001) and OS (p = 0.03) were significantly reduced in patients with elevated CEA at diagnosis; differences were not statistically significant for CA 15.3 (p > 0.05). Conclusions: CEA levels before neoadjuvant treatment could represent an important prognostic factor and may influence the choice of treatment in locally advanced breast cancer patients .

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1A1 promoter polymorphism predicts the risk of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue induced by irinotecan-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the association between genomic polymorphic variants in uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase (UGT1A1), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), and thymidylate synthase (TS) genes, and the incidence of the adverse effects of irinotecan and raltitrexed in previously heavily treated patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients received irinotecan (at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 5 wks), combined with raltitrexed (at a dose of 3 mg/m(2) every 3 wks). Genotyping for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism, the TATA box region in the UGT1A1 promoter, and tandem repeats in the TS promoter was performed on genomic DNA extracted from blood. Nineteen variables related to patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, together with genotypes, were analyzed using a binary logistic regression model with stepwise selection to evaluate their correlation with adverse reactions.

RESULTS

Toxicities (determined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were evaluated in 169 cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported to occur in 2% of cycles, Grade 2-4 nausea was reported to occur in 19% of cycles, Grade 2-4 emesis was reported to occur in 9% of cycles, Grade 2-4 diarrhea was reported to occur in 20% of cycles, Grade 2/3 fatigue was reported to occur in 11% of cycles, and Grade 3/4 hepatic toxicity was reported to occur in 7% of cycles. Homozygosis for six TA repeats in the promoter region of the UGT1A1 gene was found to be the main predictive factor for diarrhea (P < 0.00005), emesis (P = 0.0001), and fatigue (P = 0.007). Homozygosis for two tandem repeats in the TS promoter was found to be predictive of a reduced incidence of fatigue (P = 0.044). MTHFR C677T polymorphism was not found to be associated with any adverse reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study, UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism was found to be predictive of the risk of diarrhea, emesis, and fatigue caused by chemotherapy with irinotecan and raltitrexed. Screening for UGT1A1 promoter polymorphism may be clinically useful for identifying patients at a higher risk of developing a severe or potentially life-threatening toxicity after irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

High activity and reduced neurotoxicity of bi-fractionated oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The proportion of elderly within the general population is increasing and the incidence of colorectal cancer increases with age. Oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FU) combination is active in this disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter phase II study was designed to investigate feasibility, efficacy, activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated, as first-line chemotherapy, with a bi-fractionated oxaliplatin/5-FU based regimen. Treatment was oxaliplatin 45 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 and 22 h continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m2, all given intravenously on days 1 and 2, every 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were enrolled; median age was 75 years (range 70-85). Among 77 evaluable patients, we observed seven complete responses and 32 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 51% (95% confidence interval 40% to 62%). A stabilization of disease was observed in 25% of patients while 19 patients progressed. Canadian NCI grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia in 32% of patients (febrile in two), diarrhea in 10%, mucositis in 4%, and fatigue in 4%. Sensory neuropathy was mild and occurred as grade 3 in 6% of patients. ADL and IADL scores did not change significantly during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The bi-fractionated delivery of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/leucovorin demonstrated high antitumor activity in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Splitting oxaliplatin administration might reduce incidence of severe neuropathy, although this has to be confirmed by further studies.

Long-survival in responding patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-docetaxel combination. A multicentre phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The doxorubicin-docetaxel combination is active in breast cancer; the aim of the present study was to evaluate the complete response rate and safety profile of the doxorubicin and docetaxel regimen as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients entered the study. Treatment plan was: doxorubicin (50 mg/m2, i.v. bolus) followed 1 hour later by docetaxel (75 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 1 hour), q 3 weeks, for up to six courses. The patients achieving a response or a stabilisation of disease after 6 courses were allowed to intensify the treatment with docetaxel (100 mg/m2, q 3 weeks) for up to 2 courses. G-CSF (or GM-CSF) was administered if clinically indicated.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 57years (range 32-75) and 72% of them had visceral disease. A total of 217 doxorubicin-docetaxel courses were delivered, with 70% of patients receiving all the 6 planned cycles. Among the 40 patients assessable for response (WHO criteria), 7 (16%) achieved a complete remission and 22 (51%) a partial remission, for an overall response rate (intent-to-treat) of 67% (95% C.I. =53% to 81%). In 19 patients, the treatment was intensified with two more single-agent docetaxel cycles, without ameliorating the response. Twenty-seven patients with oestrogen receptor-positive received hormonal therapy as 'maintenance' after completing chemotherapy treatment. NCIC G3-G4 neutropenia was recorded in 58% of patients, with G/GM-CSF used in 23 (53%) patients and 91 (38%) cycles. No patients experienced severe cardiac or neurological toxicity. No toxic death occurred. With a median follow-up of 41 months among alive patients, we observed in responder patients an overall median time to progression and survival of 18 and 33 months respectively, with ten long-survivors still alive.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the combination doxorubicin-docetaxel as a very active regimen for metastatic breast cancer. Remarkably long survival times were observed not only in complete responders, but also in those patients who responded partially. This might be equally attributed to first-line treatment and sequential maintenance hormonal therapy.

Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasing among the elderly. We studied the toxicity and efficacy of a weekly schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients aged 70 years or above with advanced NSCLC were treated in a phase II prospective trial with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 35 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with a median age of 74 years (range 70-78) participated in the study. We observed 14 cases with partial response, 14 with stable disease and 16 with progressive disease, whilst 4 patients were not evaluable. By intention-to-treat analysis, partial response rate was 31.8% whilst progressive disease was 33.3%. Median survival was 9 months; 1-year survival probability was 34.4% and median time to progression was 4 months. Grade III-IV leukopenia was observed in 5/48 patients (10.4%), 20/48 patients (41.7%) had grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and 7/48 patients (14.6%) had grade III-IV anemia. One patient experienced grade III emesis and 2 patients had grade III-IV fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

At this dose and schedule the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin appears to be an active and well-tolerated regimen for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Randomized, multicenter, phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase II randomized study to assess the efficacy, with response as the primary endpoint, and the toxicity of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GP) and gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients were randomized to GP (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) day 2) or GC (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2), days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC=5 day 2). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were randomized to GP and 58 to GC. A total of 533 cycles were delivered (264 GP, 269 GC), with a median of four cycles/patient. The objective response rate was 41.9% (95% C.I., 29.6-54.2%) for GP and 31.0% (95% C.I., 18.2-42.8%) for GC (P=0.29). No significant differences between arms were observed in median survival (10.4 months GP, 10.8 months GC) and median time to progression (5.4 months GP, 5.1 months GC). Both regimens were very well tolerated with no statistical differences between arms in grade 3/4 toxicities. When all toxicity grades were combined, emesis, neuropathy and renal toxicity occurred more frequently on the GP arm (P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

GC arm did not provide a significant difference in response rate compared with GP arm, with better overall tolerability. Carboplatin could be a valid alternative to cisplatin in the palliative setting.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumour: a description of two cases and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Desmoplastic small round cell tumour (DSRCT) is a recently described neoplasm, typically occurring in adolescent and young males. It usually shows an aggressive behaviour, presents in the abdomen, often with diffuse peritoneal implants. It has been demonstrated to be a chemosensitive tumour, generally with short-lasting response and poor survival gain from systemic chemotherapy. The authors report two additional cases of DSRCT and review the available medical literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two young males with intra-abdominal DSRCT were treated with a first-line chemotherapy including carboplatin, doxorubicin and etoposide.

RESULTS

Both of the patients obtained a partial response after first-line chemotherapy. The first patient started, subsequently, CD34+ stem cell mobilisation with high-dose cyclophosphamide (7 g/m(2)) in order to perform high-dose chemotherapy, but CD34+ cell count was insufficient to practice leukapheresis; he died 34 months after the diagnosis because of progression of the disease. The second patient underwent cytoreductive surgery, but progressed 2 months later despite second-line treatment; he died 16 months after the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This experience confirms that DSRCT may be considered a chemosensitive tumour, highly aggressive, with short-lasting response to chemotherapy. Anyway, the recent literature suggests that multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy, surgery and radiation might be the proper approach to this rare malignancy.

Predictors of short-term survival and progression to chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based regimens

The aim of this study was to assess in patients with advanced colorectal cancer which factors were associated with short-term survival (6 months or less) and progression to first-line 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. Three hundred twenty-one consecutive nonselected patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with conventional 5-FU-based regimens as first-line treatment from 1988 to 1999. Factors related to patient, tumor, or treatment were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis by comparing short survivors (SS, those who survived <or=6 months) with those who survived longer than 6 months. The same statistical methods were used to analyze 200 patients, all treated with bolus 5-FU regimens, by comparing who progressed to treatment with those who did not. Sixty-two patients (19.3%) were SS, the remaining 259 patients survived more than 6 months. First-line chemotherapy included 5-FU in all patients; 112 (35%) and 27 (8.4%) patients were offered, after disease progression, second and third-line chemotherapy, respectively. The overall response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 12.9%. No SS patient achieved an objective response. To investigate factors associated with progression to first-line chemotherapy, we considered only those patients treated with bolus 5-FU regimens, to eliminate the variable of regimen used. Ninety-six of them progressed to treatment and 104 did not. At multivariate analysis, SS patients were characterized by the following: right and transverse colon primary (p = 0.006), younger age (p = 0.043), poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group >or= 2) (p = 0.015), elevated (>or=5 microg/l) serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p = 0.015), and more than one site of metastatic disease (p < 0.001). Progression to first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.001) was also a strong factor associated with short survival in multivariate analysis; factors predictive of progression were elevated CEA (p = 0.027) and diffuse metastatic disease (p = 0.029). Our data indicate the relevance of some clinical prognostic factors (younger age, poor performance status, elevated CEA, site of primary, number of metastatic sites, resistance to chemotherapy) as independent factors associated with poor survival and progression to first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with conventional 5-FU regimens. Patients identified by these factors as having a poor prognosis and low probability of response to treatment should be considered either for more aggressive regimens or supportive care only: conventional 5-FU treatments do not impact on response or survival.

Clinical benefit of gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy seems to improve the control of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-related symptoms, but assessment of symptomatic gain in these patients is often difficult. This study was designed to test a method for the assessment of clinical benefit in elderly advanced NSCLC patients, after weekly cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Evaluation of clinical benefit was the primary end-point. Clinical benefit derived from the evaluation of eight parameters: PS, cough, dyspnea, pain and hemoptysis were considered primary parameters. Weight loss, asthenia and anorexia were secondary parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients aged > 65 years, symptomatic at study entry, were enrolled. Responses were calculated according to the intent-to treat principle. Fifteen patients were considered as clinical benefit responders for an overall clinical benefit response rate of 52% (95% C.I. = 33.5% to 70%). The median duration of clinical benefit was 9 months (range 2-36). Tumour objective responses, according to WHO criteria, were 14, for an overall response rate of 48% (95% C.I. = 31% to 65%). Ten patients (34%) obtained both clinical benefit and tumour response. The median survival-time was 10 months (range 1-36). Chemotherapy was well-tolerated with low incidence of WHO grade III-IV toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of clinical benefit in advanced, symptomatic, elderly NSCLC patients is feasible and could be used together with tumor response and quality of life questionnaires to assess the efficacy of chemotherapy. It could reasonably be extended to non-elderly NSCLC patients. Our results suggest that weekly cisplatin-gemcitabine seems to be able to improve the principal NSCLC-related symptoms in elderly patients.

Advanced colorectal cancer in elderly patients: tolerance and efficacy of leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence increases sharply with age. In this study we assessed activity, toxicity and both the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) of the De Gramont schedule in a series of advanced CRC patients aged > or = 70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-two previously untreated advanced CRC patients entered the study. Median age was 75 (range 70-88).

RESULTS

447 courses were delivered. All of the 62 patients were evaluable for toxicity, 55 for response and ADL-IADL indexes. We recorded 2 complete and 9 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 20%. ADL and IADL indexes improved in 33%, remained stable in 49% and worsened in 18% of evaluable patients. Treatment was very well-tolerated with no serious hematological or non-hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

The De Gramont schedule was very well tolerated in advanced CRC elderly patients, although our work could not confirm the original reported activity. ADL and IADL indexes improved or remained stable in 82% of evaluable patients.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly: effective and well tolerated weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen. A pilot study

BACKGROUND

The frequency of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) increases with age and more effective and less toxic chemotherapy schedules are needed in elderly patients. Cisplatin-based regimens are considered the best treatment for advanced NSCLC, although they produce only a modest advantage in overall survival with considerable toxicity.

METHODS

In the present study the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule was evaluated in a small group of advanced NSCLC patients aged 68 years or more. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1, 8, 15 followed by 1 week of rest.

RESULTS

Fifteen previously untreated patients entered the study; their median age was 72 years (range 68-76). One hundred and sixteen weekly administrations were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 614.5 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All the 15 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate was 40% [95% CI = 16-68%]. The main toxicity was WHO grade III-IV thrombocytopenia that was recorded in 6 patients (40%). Other major toxicities were very low and no treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This schedule appears to be active, to have a favourable toxicity profile and can be considered in advanced NSCLC elderly patients. Of interest, the patients enrolled received high dose intensities of both drugs.

Roadblocks to effective pain treatment

Managed care "backlash" rhetoric to the contrary, roadblocks to effective pain treatment occur both intrinsic and extrinsic to the healthcare system. Pain medicine, an emerging, formally recognized specialty, and the special population of patients which it serves, experience additional discreet barriers. Chief among these is a lack of clear identity and recognition of the specialty and the disenfranchisement of many of the patients it serves in the American healthcare system. Special problems within various healthcare financing environments is discussed.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on day 1,8, and 15, followed by one week of rest.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%-57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4-23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1-24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.

First line chemotherapy in patients with brain metastases from non-small and small cell lung cancer

In this study we evaluated the role of systemic chemotherapy in 23 previously untreated patients with brain metastases from both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In NSCLC group, 2 patients out of 14 had a brain response after treatment (1 complete and 1 partial response). In the group of 9 patients with SCLC, we observed 5 brain responses (3 complete and 2 partial responses). Brain responses were in accordance with extracranial responses although this appeared more clearly in SCLC than in NSCLC patients.

[Role of polychemoembolization in the treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the liver]

Unresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HC) and liver metastases (LM) of abdominal tumors (AT) in progression after systemic chemotherapy (CT) have a poor prognosis and few therapeutic options. From 12/91 to 10/93 we treated 20 patients (PTS) 11 men and 9 women, with HC (10) and AT (10) with the following PCE: percutaneous placement of intraarterial hepatic catheter, superselective embolization with lipiodol (5 cc), infusion, mixed with lipiodol, of epirubicine 40 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 700 mg/m2, mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 in 30'. After infusion, the arterial tree was embolized with Ivalon until an almost complete slowing of arterial blood-flow, every 5-6 weeks (W). After a median follow-up of 28 W a total of 35 courses had been administered to 20 PTS. Median (M) age was 69 years. M PS was 2. Okuda stage in HC PTS: 1 stage I, 9 stage II. in 10 HC PTS, positive for hepatitis B virus, CT and b-IFN had failed, while 10 AT PTS (5 colorectal, 2 gastric, 1 uterine, 1 larynx, 1 choledochus) had progressed, after, at least, 2 CT regimens, and had only LM. Median time from the diagnosis of LM in AT PTS was 32 W (12-68).

TOXICITY

liver enzyme elevation and LDH elevation were 3 times baseline values, 4 PTS had fever for 6 days, 3 PTS had ileus for 3 days. No myelosuppression was observed. M alpha-fetoprotein value decreased from 468 ng/ml, to 56 ng/ml after PCE.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of centrifuge in the treatment of an intraventricular metallic foreign body. Technical note

✓ A bullet fragment within the ventricular system was immobilized by use of centrifugation in a 5°-of-freedom-of-motion simulator at 4 to 6 G's. Transient cardiovascular changes occurred, but there were no ill effects clinically. The bullet fragment was immobilized within the ependyma of the left lateral ventricle and has remained in a fixed position during a 22-month follow-up period. A brief review of the treatment of intraventricular foreign bodies is included.