Prognosis and treatment outcomes for patients with stage IA triple-negative breast cancer

To evaluate the role of chemotherapy in stage IA triple-negative breast cancer, we conducted a retrospective population-based study including 8601 patients. The use of chemotherapy significantly increased from 2010 to 2019 in patients with T1b and T1c tumors (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.70; p = 0.006), particularly in patients with T1c tumors (5-year BCSS 94.5% vs. 91.2%).

Evolution of HER2 expression between pre-treatment biopsy and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We have previously found that HER2 expression is dynamic, and can change from the primary breast tumor to matched recurrences. With this work, we aimed to assess the dynamics of HER2 during neoadjuvant treatment.(NAT).

METHODS

We reviewed HER2 expression in pre- and post-treatment samples from consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer that received NAT and underwent surgery at Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center between 01/2016-08/2022. The primary outcome was evolution of HER2 expression from pre- to post-NAT specimens in patients with residual disease.

RESULTS

Among 1613 patients receiving NAT, 1080 had residual disease at surgery. A total of 319 patients (29.5%) experienced a change in HER2 expression (HER2 0 vs. HER2-low vs. HER2-positive) from the pre-treatment sample to residual disease, with roughly equal distribution between decreased (50.5%) and increased HER2 expression (49.5%). Similar rates of change in HER2 expression were observed with anthracycline-based (31.8%) or taxane/platinum-based regimens (32.4%). Patients with HER2-0 or HER2-low tumors at diagnosis were likelier to experience a change in HER2 expression post-NAT compared to HER2-positive (32.3% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were prognostic among patients with HER2-positive tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 71.6% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.006) but not among those with HER2-negative tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 79.3% vs. 81.1%, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer showed a change in HER2 expression after NAT. Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were only prognostic in the setting of HER2-positive tumors becoming HER2-negative at surgery.

Open questions, current challenges, and future perspectives in targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low breast cancer

Approximately 60% of traditionally defined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers express low levels of HER2 [HER2-low; defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or IHC 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH)-]. HER2-low breast cancers encompass a large percentage of both hormone receptor-positive (up to 85%) and triple-negative (up to 63%) breast cancers. The DESTINY-Breast04 trial established that HER2-low tumors are targetable, leading to the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as the first HER2-directed therapy for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in the United States and Europe. This change in the clinical landscape results in a number of questions and challenges-including those related to HER2 assessment and patient identification-and highlights the need for careful assessment of HER2 expression to identify patients eligible for T-DXd. This review provides context for understanding how to identify patients with HER2-low breast cancer with respect to sample types, scoring and reporting HER2 status, and testing methods and assays. It also discusses management of important T-DXd-related adverse events. Available evidence supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with any history of IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH- scores; however, future research may further refine the population who could benefit from T-DXd or other HER2-directed therapies and identify novel methods for patient identification. Because HER2 expression can change with disease progression or treatment, and variability exists in scoring and interpretation of HER2 status, careful re-evaluation in certain scenarios may help to identify more patients who may benefit from T-DXd.

Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study

Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have a role in the post-neoadjuvant setting in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the effects of nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, capecitabine, or the combination in changing peripheral immunoscore (PIS) remains unclear. This open-label randomized phase II OXEL study (NCT03487666) aimed to assess the immunologic effects of nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination in terms of the change in PIS (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included the presence of ctDNA, toxicity, clinical outcomes at 2-years and association of ctDNA and PIS with clinical outcomes. Forty-five women with TNBC and residual invasive disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination. Here we show that a combination of nivolumab plus capecitabine leads to a greater increase in PIS from baseline to week 6 (91%) compared with nivolumab (47%) or capecitabine (53%) alone (log-rank p = 0.08), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. In addition, the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is associated with disease recurrence, with no new safety signals in the combination arm. Our results provide efficacy and safety data on this combination in TNBC and support further development of PIS and ctDNA analyses to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

Prevalence and spectrum of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a cohort of ovarian cancer patients from the Salento peninsula (Southern Italy): a matter of preventive health

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this exploratory, descriptive study was to characterize the deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants evaluated by genetic testing in a group of Ovarian cancer patients living in the Salento peninsula (Southern Italy).

METHODS

From June 2014 to July 2023, patients with histologically confirmed high-grade serous carcinoma, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who were referred to Lecce Familial Cancer Clinic were considered. BRCA-mutation genetic testing was performed on these patients. Socio-demographic data and cancer epidemiology were assessed, and Next Generation Sequencing and Sanger DNA sequencing were performed.

RESULTS

The median age at the diagnosis of 332 ovarian cancer patients collected was 57 years. The pedigree analyses showed that 28.6% had familial cases and 39.7% had sporadic cases. Of the 319 patients submitted to genetic testing, 29.8% were carriers of BRCA1/2 mutation, 75.8% at BRCA1 and 24.2% at BRCA2 gene. Of the 21 BRCA1 mutations, the variant c.5266dupC was the most frequent alteration (28.4%). With respect to BRCA2, 13 mutations were found and the variant c.9676delT was the most frequently recorded (6.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that the prevalence of germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was higher than reported by other studies. A broader understanding of the prevalence and role of BRCA mutations in development, response to treatment, and prognosis represents an exciting and developing area of ovarian cancer treatment and prevention.

Evaluation of the Geographical Accessibility of Genome-Matched Clinical Trials on a National Experience

BACKGROUND

Molecular-driven oncology allows oncologists to identify treatments that match a cancer's genomic profile. Clinical trials are promoted as an effective modality to deliver a molecularly matched treatment. We explore the role of geographical accessibility in Italy, and its impact on patient access to clinical trials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed molecular data from a single-institutional case series of patients receiving next-generation sequencing testing between March 2019 and July 2020. Actionable alterations were defined as the ones with at least one matched treatment on Clinicaltrials.gov at the time of genomic report signature. We then calculated the hypothetical distance to travel to reach the nearest assigned clinical trial.

RESULTS

We identified 159 patients eligible for analysis. One hundred and one could be potentially assigned to a clinical trial in Italy, and the median distance that patients needed to travel to reach the closest location with a suitable clinical trial was 76 km (interquartile range = 127.46 km). Geographical distribution of clinical trials in Italy found to be heterogeneous, with Milan and Naples being the areas with a higher concentration. We then found that the probability of having a clinical trial close to a patient's hometown increased over time, according to registered studies between 2015 and 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

The median distance to be travelled to the nearest trial was generally acceptable for patients, and trials availability is increasing. Nevertheless, many areas are still lacking trials, so efforts are required to increase and homogenize the possibilities to be enrolled in clinical trials for Italian patients with cancer.

Baseline Tumor Size as Prognostic Index in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Experimental Targeted Agents

BACKGROUND

Baseline tumor size (BTS) has been associated with outcomes in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of BTS on patients receiving targeted therapies (TTs) remains undetermined.

METHODS

We reviewed data of patients with advanced solid tumors consecutively treated within early-phase clinical trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as immunotherapy-based or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST1.1 baseline target lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 444 patients were eligible; the median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). OS was significantly longer for patients with BTS lower versus higher than the median (16.6 vs. 8.2 months, P < .001), including among those receiving immunotherapy (12 vs. 7.5 months, P = .005). Among patients receiving TT, lower BTS was associated with longer PFS (4.7 vs. 3.1 months, P = .002) and OS (20.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < .001) as compared to high BTS. However, such association was only significant among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with longer PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months, P < .001) and OS (21.2 vs. 6.7 months, P < .001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs. 22%, P = .57). BTS was not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs. 4.4 months, P = .30), OS (19.3 vs. 11.8 months, P = .20), and ORR (33% vs. 28%, P = .78) in the 2 BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (P = .03) and OS (P < .001) but not with ORR (P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BTS is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients receiving biomarker-matched, but not biomarker-unmatched TT.

Immunotherapy for Early-Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Is Earlier Better?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this narrative review, we discuss the optimal timing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the landscape of predictive biomarkers for the use of immunotherapy, and the mounting literature suggesting a benefit for an early use of ICI.

RECENT FINDINGS

TNBC is associated with a poor prognosis relative to other breast cancer subtypes, and until recently, the treatment of TNBC was limited to cytotoxic chemotherapy. In 2021, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, was approved in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early stage TNBC. This approval changed the treatment paradigm of early TNBC concomitantly raised several challenges in clinical practice, pertaining to patient selection, toxicity management, and post-neoadjuvant treatment, among others. The introduction of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for early TNBC. However, several challenges, including patient selection, toxicity management, and the identification of predictive biomarkers, need to be addressed. Future research should focus on refining the timing and duration of immunotherapy, optimizing the chemotherapy partner, and exploring novel predictive biomarkers of response or toxicity.

Adjuvant nivolumab, capecitabine or the combination in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer: the OXEL randomized phase II study

Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have a role in the post-neoadjuvant setting in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the effects of nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor, capecitabine, or the combination in changing peripheral immunoscore (PIS) remains unclear. This open-label randomized phase II OXEL study (NCT03487666) aimed to assess the immunologic effects of nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination in terms of the change in PIS (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints include the presence of ctDNA, toxicity, clinical outcomes at 2-years and association of ctDNA and PIS with clinical outcomes. Forty-five women with TNBC and residual invasive disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to nivolumab, capecitabine, or the combination. Here we show that a combination of nivolumab plus capecitabine leads to a greater increase in PIS from baseline to week 6 (91%) compared with nivolumab (47%) or capecitabine (53%) alone (log-rank p = 0.08), meeting the pre-specified primary endpoint. In addition, the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was associated with disease recurrence, with no new safety signals in the combination arm. Our results provide efficacy and safety data on this combination in TNBC and support further development of PIS and ctDNA analyses to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

Opportunities and Challenges for a Histology-Agnostic Utilization of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review delves into the prospects and challenges offered by a potential pan-histological utilization of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) T-DXd has shown broad activity across cancer types, with current indications for patients with biomarker-selected breast, gastric, and non-small-cell lung cancer and relevant activity observed in multiple histology-specific trials. Moreover, two recently reported phase 2 trials (DESTINY-Pantumor02 and HERALD) have supported the potential for a pan-cancer utilization of this ADC in patients with advanced cancers expressing HER2 or with HER2 amplifications. By improving the delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapy, ADCs have allowed for meaningful clinical advantages in broad populations of cancer patients, often leading to survival advantages over conventional chemotherapy. Notably, the broad spectrum of activity of certain ADCs has led to the hypothesis of a histology-agnostic utilization based on detecting specific biomarkers, similar to what is already established for certain targeted treatments and immunotherapy. To date, T-DXd has shown the broadest activity across cancer types, with current approvals in breast, gastric, and lung cancer, and relevant antitumor activity observed in a multiplicity of additional cancer types. The optimization of the drug dose, identification of predictive biomarkers, and clarification of mechanisms of resistance will be critical steps in view of a pan-histological expansion in the use of T-DXd.

Sequencing Antibody Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Exploring Future Roles

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as a highly effective treatment strategy across breast cancer (BC) subtypes, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+), hormone-receptor positive (ER/PR+), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Over the past twenty years, ADCs have undergone relevant evolutions, from target diversity to payload ratio, to linker design, allowing for a progressive increase in their efficacy. From the first-generation ADC, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), approved in 2013 for HER2+ breast cancer, to next generation ADCs such as sacituzumab govitecan and trastuzumab deruxtecan, to emerging ADCs on the horizon, we continue to see unparalleled efficacy compared to traditional chemotherapy. However, each ADC has brought a new cadre of adverse events for clinicians and patients to manage. Importantly, with the development and approval of several ADCs to treat metastatic breast cancer, there are unanswered clinical questions surrounding how to optimally sequence treatment for patients who may be candidates for more than one ADC and, in general, how to treat patients beyond progression on ADCs. From bench to bedside, in this review, we will discuss the pharmacology and current indications for the novel ADCs trastuzumab deruxtecan and sacituzumab govitecan. Highlighting emerging ADCs and ongoing clinical trials, we will anticipate the changes in the breast cancer treatment paradigm. Lastly, we will outline the available data and current approaches for adverse event management and sequencing strategies for ADCs in clinical practice, including proposed mechanisms of resistance.

Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancer

The molecular underpinnings of HER2-low and HER2-0 (IHC 0) breast tumors remain poorly defined. Using genomic findings from 1039 patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer undergoing next-generation sequencing from 7/2013-12/2020, we compare results between HER2-low (n = 487, 47%) and HER2-0 tumors (n = 552, 53%). A significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles (median copy count: 2.05) are observed among HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-0 (median copy count: 1.79; P = 2.36e-6), with HER2-0 tumors harboring a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions (31.1% vs. 14.5%). No other genomic alteration reaches significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing, and no significant differences in tumor mutational burden are observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors (median: 7.26 mutations/megabase vs. 7.60 mutations/megabase, p = 0.24). Here, we show that the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors does not differ significantly, apart from a higher ERBB2 copy count among HER2-low tumors, and a higher rate of ERBB2 hemideletions in HER2-0 tumors.

Next-generation antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer: Moving beyond HER2 and TROP2

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have reshaped the treatment of several malignancies, including breast cancer. Two ADCs are currently approved for the treatment of each breast cancer subtype, including the HER2 targeted ADCs trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and the TROP2-targeted ADC sacituzumab govitecan. Each of the ADC components (antibody, linker, and payload) plays a key role in determining the efficacy and toxicity profile of an individual ADC, and their modification can lead to major changes in the clinical profile of these agents. Leveraging the knowledge from three decades of development in the field, several novel ADCs are currently being investigated. Some approaches include targeting different antigens beyond the established HER2/TROP2, or evaluating innovative constructs, such as bispecific ADCs, ADCs with dual payload, immune-modulating ADCs, radionuclide drug conjugates, and masked ADCs, among others. In this review article we discuss the evolving landscape of novel ADCs, highlighting opportunities and challenges emerging in the field.

The efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, the available human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) targeted agents were ineffective for treating patients with HER2-low expressing breast cancer (defined as immunohistochemical expression of 1+ or 2+ without amplification). The development of novel and potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, affective at treating HER2-low expressing breast cancers, have changed the way we think about HER2-low expression and expanded the treatment options for many patients with advanced disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the current management of HER2-low breast cancer and commonly encountered challenges such as treatment sequencing and toxicity management.

EXPERT OPINION

trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a treatment option for patients with advanced, HER2-low breast cancer, irrespective of the hormone receptor status. The current optimal place in treatment algorithms is after the first line of chemotherapy, both in HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer; however, other agents are available in this setting and risks and benefits for each should be considered in shared decision making. Up to 10-15% of patients receiving T-DXd develop interstitial lung disease. Patient and clinician education are key to safely implement T-DXd in clinical practice.

Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure

The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.

ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.

Detecting and Managing T-DXd-Related Interstitial Lung Disease: The Five "S" Rules

[Media: see text].

Identifying Patterns and Barriers in OncotypeDX Recurrence Score Testing in Older Patients With Early-Stage, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Implications for Guidance and Reimbursement

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical patterns of utilization of OncotypeDX Recurrence Score (RS) in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (BC) at an academic center with previously established internal reflex testing guidelines.

METHODS

RS testing in accordance with preexisting reflex criteria and predictors of utilization outside of reflex criteria were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2019-2021 in a quality improvement evaluation. Patients were grouped according to OncotypeDX testing within (cohort A) or outside (cohort B) of predefined criteria which included a cap at age older than 65 years.

RESULTS

Of 1,687 patients whose tumors had RS testing, 1,087 were in cohort A and 600 in cohort B. In cohort B, nearly half of patients were older than 65 years (n = 279; IQR, 67-72 years). For patients older than 65 years, those with RS testing were younger (median age: 69 v 73 years), with higher grade cancers (G2-3: 84.9% v 54.7%) and were more likely to be treated with chemotherapy (15.4% v 4.1%). Issues for implementation of RS testing in older patients were identified, including potential structural barriers related to the current policy on the reimbursements of genomic tests.

CONCLUSION

Internal guidelines may facilitate standardized utilization of the RS in early-BC. Our data suggest that clinicians preferred broader utilization of RS across the age spectrum, with therapeutically important consequences. Modifying the current policy for reimbursement of RS testing and in internal reflexive testing criteria for those older than 65 years is warranted.

Metaplastic breast cancer: an all-round multidisciplinary consensus

Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype of breast cancer (BC) characterized by the presence of at least two cellular types, commonly epithelial and mesenchymal components. Despite growing evidence that MpBC is a unique entity, it has long been treated as a variant of nonspecial type (NST) BC. MpBC typically shows the phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), but compared to NST-TNBC, it is a relatively chemorefractory tumor associated with worse outcomes. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop management guidelines specifically for MpBC to improve the prognosis of patients with early MpBC. This expert consensus aims to guide diagnosis and standardize clinical management of early MpBC among treating physicians. We provide guidance on the challenging radiological and pathological diagnosis of MpBC. Evidence on the involvement of genetic predisposition in the development of MpBC is also explored. We emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for the treatment of patients with early MpBC. The optimal surgery and radiotherapy approach is presented, as well as the opportunity offered by novel therapeutic approaches to increase treatment response in this chemoresistant subtype. Appropriate management of patients with MpBC is critical to reduce the high risk of local and distant recurrence that characterizes this disease.

Managing adverse events of sacituzumab govitecan

INTRODUCTION

The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized treatment for breast cancer. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop2-targeted ADC, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize the evidence for SG use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, discuss the toxicity profile, and present strategies to manage adverse events.

EXPERT OPINION

Hematologic toxicities are frequently observed with SG therapy. Neutropenia, reported in up to 72% of cases, often requires dose reductions or delays. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor can be helpful in managing and preventing this toxicity. Anemia is another common toxicity and patients may require transfusions of packed red blood cells. Gastrointestinal toxicities are also common. A tailored regimen of prophylactic antiemetics (2-3 agents) should be initiated before SG infusion. For diarrhea, infectious workup should be considered on a case-by-case basis; patients should start loperamide and fluid/electrolyte replacement if necessary. Severe diarrhea associated with cholinergic syndrome should prompt the administration of atropine. Fatigue occurs in approximately half of the patients receiving SG, and <50% of patients experience complete alopecia during treatment. The approval of SG has significantly improved treatment outcomes; however, effective management of the toxicities is critical to optimize patient care and treatment adherence.

Optimizing the safety of antibody-drug conjugates for patients with solid tumours

Over the past 5 years, improvements in the design of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have enabled major advances that have reshaped the treatment of several advanced-stage solid tumours. Considering the intended rationale behind the design of ADCs, which is to achieve targeted delivery of cytotoxic molecules by linking them to antibodies targeting tumour-specific antigens, ADCs would be expected to be less toxic than conventional chemotherapy. However, most ADCs are still burdened by off-target toxicities that resemble those of the cytotoxic payload as well as on-target toxicities and other poorly understood and potentially life-threatening adverse effects. Given the rapid expansion in the clinical indications of ADCs, including use in curative settings and various combinations, extensive efforts are ongoing to improve their safety. Approaches currently being pursued include clinical trials optimizing the dose and treatment schedule, modifications of each ADC component, identification of predictive biomarkers for toxicities, and the development of innovative diagnostic tools. In this Review, we describe the determinants of the toxicities of ADCs in patients with solid tumours, highlighting key strategies that are expected to improve tolerability and enable improvements in the treatment outcomes of patients with advanced-stage and those with early stage cancers in the years to come.

Assessment of the HER2DX Assay in Patients With ERBB2-Positive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab

Importance

Patients with early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer (ERBB2+ BC) who experience a pathologic complete response (pCR) after receiving neoadjuvant therapy have favorable survival outcomes. Predicting the likelihood of pCR may help optimize neoadjuvant therapy.

Objective

To test the ability of the HER2DX assay to predict the likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC who are receiving deescalated neoadjuvant therapy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this diagnostic/prognostic study, the HER2DX assay was administered on pretreatment tumor biopsy samples from patients enrolled in the single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase 2 DAPHNe clinical trial who had newly diagnosed stage II to III ERBB2+ BC that was treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 3 weeks for 4 cycles.

Interventions and Exposures

The HER2DX assay is a classifier derived from gene expression and limited clinical features that provides 2 independent scores to predict prognosis and likelihood of pCR in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The assay was administered on baseline tumor samples from 80 of 97 patients (82.5%) in the DAPHNe trial.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary aim was to test the ability of the HER2DX pCR likelihood score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0).

Results

Of 80 participants, 79 (98.8%) were women and there were 4 African American (5.0%), 6 Asian (7.5%), 4 Hispanic (5.0%), and 66 White individuals (82.5%); the mean (range) age was 50.3 (26.0-78.0) years. The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.08; P < .001). The pCR rates in the HER2DX high, medium, and low pCR score groups were 92.6%, 63.6%, and 29.0%, respectively (high vs low odds ratio, 30.6; P < .001). The HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR independently of hormone receptor status, ERBB2 immunohistochemistry score, HER2DX ERBB2 expression score, and prediction analysis of microarray 50 ERBB2-enriched subtype. The correlation between the HER2DX pCR score and prognostic risk score was weak (Pearson coefficient, -0.12). Performance of the risk score could not be assessed due to lack of recurrence events.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this diagnostic/prognostic study suggest that the HER2DX pCR score assay could predict pCR following treatment with deescalated neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with early-stage ERBB2+ BC. The HER2DX pCR score might guide therapeutic decisions by identifying patients who are candidates for deescalated or escalated approaches.

Filling the Gap after CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Novel Endocrine and Biologic Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

The rise of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors has rapidly reshaped treatment algorithms for hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, with endocrine treatment (ET) plus a CDK4/6-inhibitor currently representing the standard of care in the first line setting. However, treatment selection for those patients experiencing progression while on ET + CDK4/6-inhibitors remains challenging due to the suboptimal activity or significant toxicities of the currently available options. There is also a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of older regimens, such as everolimus + exemestane, post-CDK4/6 inhibition. In this setting of high unmet need, several clinical trials of novel drugs have recently reported encouraging results: the addition of the AKT-inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS); the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) elacestrant prolonged PFS compared to traditional ET in a phase 3 trial, particularly among patients with detectable ESR1 mutations; finally, PARP inhibitors are available treatment options for patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Overall, a plethora of novel endocrine and biologic treatment options are finally filling the gap between first-line ET and later line chemotherapy. In this review article, we recapitulate the activity of these novel treatment options and their potential role in future treatment algorithms.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: a New Subtype?

OPINION STATEMENT

Breast cancer (BC) guidelines subdivide the disease into three main groups, namely hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple-negative BC (TNBC). The natural history of the HER2-positive subtype has changed since the introduction of HER-targeted therapies, which demonstrated benefit only in case of HER2 overexpression (IHC, score 3+) or gene amplification. Such observation may depend on direct drug inhibition of HER2 downstream signaling, which is needed for survival and proliferation in HER2-addicted BC. Clinically focused categories cannot comprehensively describe biology, as almost half of the currently defined HER2-negative BCs show some degree of IHC expression and have been recently renamed as HER2-low. Why? As technological breakthroughs enable the synthesis of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), target antigens may be viewed not only as a biological switch to be turned on-off by targeted drugs but also as an anchor for ADC docking and tethering. As trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has already proven in the clinical trial DESTINY-Breast04, even fewer HER2 available receptors on cancer cells may be sufficient for a clinical benefit. So, for HR-negative HER2-low subtype (~40% of TNBCs), though only 58 patients had been enrolled in DESTINY-Breast04, the observed benefit, together with the dismal prognosis of TNBC, warrants the use of T-DXd. Notably, another topoisomerase-based ADC, sacituzumab govitecan, has already been granted approval for pretreated TNBC (ASCENT). As no head-to-head comparison has been performed, the choice relies on regulatory approvals at the time of patient assessment, critical appraisal of available evidence, and careful evaluation of possible cross-resistance with sequential use of ADCs. As for HR-positive HER2-low disease (~60% of HR-positive tumors), DESTINY-Breast04 provides solid evidence for T-DXd prioritization in either second or third treatment lines. Although the remarkable activity observed in this setting favorably compares with outcomes observed in treatment-naive patients, the ongoing DESTINY-Breast06 will clarify the role of T-DXd in this population.

Nodal positivity and systemic therapy among patients with clinical T1-T2N0 human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive breast cancer: Results from two international cohorts

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for patients with small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumors is based on nodal status. The authors' objective was to evaluate pathologic nodal disease (pathologic lymph node-positive [pN-positive] and pathologic lymph node-positive after preoperative systemic therapy [ypN-positive]) rates in patients who had clinical T1-T2 (cT1-cT2)N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with upfront surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Two databases were queried for patients who had cT1-cT2N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer: (1) the Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (DF/BCC) from February 2015 to October 2020 and (2) the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona and the Hospital Clinico of Valencia (HCB/HCV) from January 2012 to September 2021. The pN-positive/ypN-positive and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) rates were compared between patients who underwent upfront surgery versus those who received NAC.

RESULTS

Among 579 patients from the DF/BCC database, 368 underwent upfront surgery, and 211 received NAC; the rates of nodal positivity were 19.8% and 12.8%, respectively (p = .021). The pN-positive rates increased by tumor size (p < .001), reaching 25% for those with cT1c tumors. The ypN-positive rates did not correlate with tumor size. NAC was associated with decreased nodal positivity (odds ratio, 0.411; 95% confidence interval, 0.202-0.838), but the ALND rates were similar (22 of 368 patients [6.0%] who underwent upfront surgery vs. 18 of 211 patients [8.5%] who received NAC; p = .173). Among 292 patients from the HCB/HCV database, 119 underwent upfront surgery, and 173 received NAC; the rates of nodal positivity were 21% and 10.4%, respectively (p = .012). The pN-positive rates increased with tumor size (p = .011). The ALND rates were equivalent by treatment strategy (23 of 119 patients [19.3%] who underwent upfront surgery vs. 24 of 173 patients [13.9%] who received NAC; p = .213).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had cT1-cT2N0M0, HER2-positive breast cancer, approximately 20% who underwent upfront surgery were pN-positive, and the rate reached 25% for those with cT1c tumors. Given the opportunity for tailored therapy among lymph node-positive, HER2-positive patients, these data provide rationale for future analyses investigating the utility of routine axillary imaging in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Abstract P1-04-05: Independent validation of the HER2DX genomic test in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP): a correlative analysis from the DAPHNe phase II clinical trial

Background: HER2DX is a 27-gene prognostic (risk-score) and predictive (pathological complete response [pCR]-score) assay in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer (BC) based on clinical data and the expression of 4 gene signatures (immune, proliferation, luminal differentiation, and HER2 amplicon). Here we aim to evaluate, for the first time, the ability of HER2DX to predict pCR following neoadjuvant THP in HER2+ BC.

Methods: Standardized HER2DX was evaluated centrally on baseline pre-treatment FFPE tumor biopsies from the DAPHNe phase II trial (Waks et al. NPJ Breast 2022; NCT03716180), in which patients (pts) with newly diagnosed stage II-III HER2+ BC were treated with neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel × 12 and HP every 3 weeks × 4. Primary aim was to test the ability of HER2DX pCR-score to predict pCR (ypT0/isN0). Secondary objectives were to test the ability of HER2DX pCR-score to predict pCR independent of clinical-pathological variables and PAM50 subtype (HER2-enriched vs not) and to evaluate the association of HER2DX pCR-score with HER2DX risk-score. Five patients who received additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy after THP were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression and receiver-operator curve (ROC) analysis were assessed. Statistical analyses were performed in R code 4.0.5.

Results: HER2DX was evaluated in 80 of 97 pts (82.5%) enrolled in the DAPHNe trial who received study treatment. Clinical T2-4 disease represented 81.3% of cases (n=65), clinical node-negative disease (cN0) represented 65.0% of cases (n=52), and 70.0% of tumors (n=56) were hormone receptor-positive. The overall pCR rate was 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49.3-70.7): 87.0% (95% CI 79.6-94.4) in hormone receptor-negative disease and 48.2% (95% CI 37.2-59.1) in hormone receptor-positive disease. The proportion of HER2DX low-, medium- and high-pCR groups was 38.8%, 27.5% and 33.7%, respectively. HER2DX pCR-score (as a continuous variable from 0 to 100) was significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio [OR]=1.05, p&lt; 0.0001). In the overall population, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, pCR-med and pCR-low groups were 92.6%, 63.6% and 29.0% (pCR-high vs pCR-low OR=30.6, p&lt; 0.0001), respectively. The AUC ROC of HER2DX pCR score (as a continuous variable) and pCR status was 0.835. In the ER-negative population, the pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-high, pCR-med and pCR-low groups were 94.7%, 66.7%, and 0%, respectively (Table 1). HER2DX pCR-score was significantly associated with pCR independent of hormone receptor status, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) score, clinical stage, and PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype. The correlation between HER2DX pCR-score and HER2DX risk-score was weak (Pearson coefficient=-0.12), as previously described (Prat et al. EBiomedicine 2022). 51.3% of patients were categorized as HER2DX low-risk.

Conclusion: The 27-gene HER2DX genomic test predicts pCR following neoadjuvant THP in newly diagnosed stage II-III HER2+ BC. Patients with HER2DX pCR-low score and HER2DX high-risk score, representing 22.5% of pts, warrant further attention in order to optimize therapeutic strategies in this subset. The combination of HER2DX pCR-score and risk-score might guide therapeutic decisions by identifying patients who are ideal candidates for de-escalated or escalated systemic and locoregional treatments.

Table 1

Citation Format: Adrienne Waks, Esther R. Ogayo, Laia Paré, Mercedes Marín-Aguilera, Fara Brasó-Maristany, Patricia Galván, Oleguer Castillo, Olga Martínez-Sáez, Ana Vivancos, Patricia Villagrasa, Paolo Tarantino, Neelam Desai, Jennifer Guerriero, Otto Metzger, Nadine Tung, Ian Krop, Joel S Parker, Charles M. Perou, Aleix Prat, Eric Winer, Sara Tolaney, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf. Independent validation of the HER2DX genomic test in HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant paclitaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP): a correlative analysis from the DAPHNe phase II clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-05.

Abstract HER2-10: HER2-10 Dynamics of HER2-low expression in triple-negative breast cancer

Background: With the development of novel antibody drug conjugates (ADC), it is increasingly important to understand the changes that occur in cell-surface targets over time from early-stage to metastatic breast cancer. Discordance in HER2 expression per immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been reported between primary and metastatic tumors in patients (pts) with HER2-negative breast cancer defined per ASCO/CAP guidelines, with both gain and loss of expression described. Representation of HR-negative (TNBC) tumors has been limited in these studies, and HER2 status at multiple time points in TNBC has not been described. Here we report changes in HER2 IHC in patients diagnosed with TNBC, using a collection of matched tumor samples over time. Methods: Pts were identified from two sources: 1) an institutional database including all consecutive pts who underwent surgery for stage I-III breast cancer at Dana-Farber/Brigham Cancer Center between 2015-2018, and 2) a prospective research biopsy protocol for pts with known or suspected metastatic breast cancer. Pts were included in the present analysis if they received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for stage I-III TNBC (eTNBC), or if they were diagnosed with any stage TNBC and ultimately developed metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Clinical pathology records were reviewed for HER2 IHC results of samples collected at: initial diagnosis (DX); residual disease (RD) post-NAC, if applicable; and at recurrence (M). HER2 IHC was classified as HER2-0 if HER2 IHC 0, and HER2-low if 1+ or 2+ (and ISH non-amplified). For matched comparisons, if IHC was performed in more than one DX sample (e.g., breast, node), only the breast was considered; if more than one M sample, only the first M biopsy with available IHC was considered. Results: Among 110 pts in this cohort, 101 were initially diagnosed with eTNBC (79 received NAC; 22 underwent surgery as first intervention) and 9 with de novo mTNBC. Median age was 48.7 years (range 19.8-71.6). Among all pts, a total of 292 samples (136 DX, 53 RD, 103 M) had available HER2 IHC scores. When restricting to one sample per time point, HER2-low prevalence was 49/102 (48.0%) in DX breast tumors, 21/53 (39.6%) in RD, and 13/58 (22.4%) in first M samples (with all remaining samples HER2-0, except one HER2 3+ sample). In eTNBC pts, HER2 IHC scores were available for 50 paired DX and RD, and 48 paired DX and M samples. Among 50 pts with paired DX and RD, HER2 IHC was discordant in 56% (28/50) (Table 1). Of the 21 HER2-0 DX tumors, 23.8% (5/21) became HER2-low at RD. Of the 29 HER2-low DX tumors, 51.7% (15/29) became HER2-0 at RD. Among 48 eTNBC pts who recurred and had paired DX and M samples, HER2 IHC was discordant in 50% (24/48) (Table 1). Change from HER2-0 to low was 12.5% (3/24), and from HER2-low to HER2-0 was 66.7% (16/24). Among 9 de novo mTNBC pts, 5 had HER2 IHC available in paired DX breast and M prior to starting therapy; 3 were concordant (IHC 0, n=2; IHC 1+, n=1), one had IHC 0 in DX breast and IHC 2+ in M (liver), one had IHC 1+ in DX breast and IHC 0 in M (node). Conclusions: HER2 IHC classification was discordant in about half of the TNBC cases we examined, with more frequent rates of conversion from HER2-low to HER2-0 in both paired DX/RD post-NAC, and paired DX/M samples. Additional analyses will be presented exploring HER2 IHC changes among multiple metastases per patient. Genomic and molecular analysis, including whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and methylation profiling, are underway in these samples to further elucidate HER2 evolutionary dynamics.

Citation Format: Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Lan D. Ngo, Edward T. Richardson, Allison Frangieh, Ayesha Mohammed-Abreu, Melissa E. Hughes, Jorge Gomez Tejada Zanudo, John Navarro, Paolo Tarantino, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Sara Tolaney, Tari King, Eric Winer, Nancy U. Lin, Nikhil Wagle. HER2-10 Dynamics of HER2-low expression in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-10.

Abstract PD18-01: Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel plus Trastuzumab for Stage I HER2+ Breast Cancer: 5-year results and correlative analyses from ATEMPT (TBCRC033)

Background: The ATEMPT trial primary analysis found that one year of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) achieved a 3-year iDFS of 97.8% for patients with stage I HER2+ breast cancer, but was not associated with fewer clinically relevant toxicities (CRTs) compared with paclitaxel and trastuzumab (TH). In this end-of-study analysis, we report 5-year survival outcomes and correlative analyses from the trial. Methods: Patients with stage I centrally confirmed HER2+ breast cancer were randomly assigned 3:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 for one year or TH and received T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 17 cycles or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV with weekly trastuzumab IV followed by trastuzumab for 9 months. The co-primary objectives were to compare the incidence of CRTs between the 2 arms and to evaluate iDFS in patients receiving T-DM1. To investigate proteomic correlates of recurrence, spatial proteomic analyses were performed on samples from 13 patients experiencing iDFS events (cases) and 24 matched controls using the NanoString GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler. The impact of HER2 heterogeneity on outcomes was investigated among 17 cases and 51 matched controls by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). HER2 genetic heterogeneity was assessed by scrutinizing the whole tumor area and defined as the occurrence of HER2 gene amplification in &gt;5% but &lt; 50% invasive tumor cells. The risk of recurrence was evaluated centrally with the HER2DX genomic assay from 225 primary tumor samples. Germline whole genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted among 55 patients experiencing T-DM1-induced thrombocytopenia and/or bleeding and 55 matched controls to identify genomic correlates for this side effect. Results: A total of 497 patients who initiated protocol therapy were included in this analysis (383 T-DM1 and 114 TH). After a median follow up 5.8 years, among patients receiving T-DM1 there were a total of 11 iDFS events, with 3 distant recurrences. The 5-year iDFS for T-DM1 was 97.0% (95% CI, 95.3-98.8%), the 5-year recurrence-free interval (RFI) was 98.6% (95% CI: 97.4-99.8%) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) for T-DM1 was 97.8 % (95% CI, 96.3-99.3%). Although the study was not powered to evaluate the efficacy of TH, among the 114 patients receiving TH, a total of 9 iDFS events were observed, including 2 distant events; the 5-year iDFS with TH was 91.3% (95% CI: 86.0-96.9%), 5-year RFI was 93.3% (95% CI: 88.6-98.2%) and 5-year OS was 97.9% (95% CI: 95.2-100%). A total of 56 samples were evaluable for heterogeneity analyses, among which 14% (n=8) harbored HER2 genetic heterogeneity. Spatial proteomic analyses found that NF1 (adjusted p=0.72 × 10-6) and CTLA-4 (adjusted p=0.15 × 10-3) were significantly upregulated in primary samples from cases, while cleaved caspase 9, CD25, GITR, ICOS, p53 and PD-L2 were significantly upregulated in controls (all with adjusted p&lt; 0.05). Germline WGS found that the top gene associations with thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia or bleeding were ALMS1 (p=0,19 × 10-3) and APBA3 (p=0,23 × 10-3), respectively, although none reaching the threshold for genome wide significance. rs62143195 and rs114169776 were the top single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with thrombocytopenia and thrombocytopenia or bleeding, respectively. Data on the impact of HER2 heterogeneity and of HER2DX score on survival outcomes will be presented. Conclusion: With longer follow-up, adjuvant T-DM1 confirmed outstanding long-term outcomes among patients with stage I HER2+ breast cancer, demonstrating a 5-year RFI of 98.6%. Spatial proteomic analyses identified a potential association between NF1 and CTLA-4 expression with recurrence. Details on the impact of HER2 heterogeneity and HER2DX assay on prognosis will be presented.

Citation Format: Paolo Tarantino, Nabihah Tayob, Chau T Dang, Denise Yardley, Steven J. Isakoff, Vicente Valero, Meredith Faggen, Therese Mulvey, Ron Bose, Douglas Weckstein, Antonio C. Wolff, Katherine Reeder-Hayes, Hope Rugo, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Dan Zuckerman, Lowell Hart, Vijayakrishna K. Gadi, Michael Constantine, Kit Cheng, Audrey Merrill Garrett, Paul K. Marcom, Kathy S. Albain, Patricia DeFusco, Nadine Tung, Blair Ardman, Rita Nanda, Rachel C. Jankowitz, Mothaffar Rimawi, Vandana Abramson, Paula R. Pohlmann, Catherine Van Poznak, Andres Forero-Torres, Minetta C. Liu, Kathryn Ruddy, Yue Zheng, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Adrienne Waks, Michelle K. DeMeo, Molly K. DiLullo, Giuseppe Curigliano, Harold Burstein, Ann Partridge, Eric Winer, Giuseppe Viale, Winnie Hui, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Bryan P. Schneider, Aleix Prat, Ian Krop, Sara Tolaney. Adjuvant Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Paclitaxel plus Trastuzumab for Stage I HER2+ Breast Cancer: 5-year results and correlative analyses from ATEMPT (TBCRC033) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD18-01.

Abstract HER2-05: HER2-05 Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low breast cancer

Background: About half of all breast cancers exhibit low HER2 expression. Despite lack of ERBB2 amplification, HER2-low tumors respond to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), leading to the NCCN recommendation of T-DXd both for patients with HER2+ and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It remains however unclear if HER2-low represents a distinct molecular entity, as compared to HER2-0 MBC. Here, we compare the genomic landscape of HER2-low versus HER2-0 breast cancers in a large, single institution cohort. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with MBC seen at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 07/2013 and 12/2020. Patients were included if they had HER2-negative MBC per ASCO/CAP Guidelines and had undergone next generation sequencing (NGS) testing with a targeted, tumor-only platform (OncoPanel). Based on the HER2 status of the specimen tested by NGS, patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) HER2-low if immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ non-amplified, or (ii) HER2-0 if IHC 0. Mutations of interest detected on NGS were classified as oncogenic using the OncoKB tool and additional annotation. Genomic profiles of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors were compared using Chi-Square and Kruskal-Wallis tests. To determine genomic event enrichment between the two HER2 groups, logistic regression models were used, accounting for background rate and estrogen receptor (ER) expression. ERBB2 copy counts were calculated for tumors with recorded histology-estimated purities and copy-number segmentation using a simple model of allelic gain/loss. Results: Among 1847 patients with HER2-negative MBC, 1043 underwent NGS testing on a HER2-low (n=489, 47%) or HER2-0 sample (n=554, 53%). Most samples were metastatic (71%, n=743) while 29% (n=300) were from primary tumors. 73% had ductal histology, 13% were lobular and 14% had mixed or other histology. ER expression was enriched among HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors (76% vs. 60%; p&lt; 0.001). Focusing on the most commonly occurring genetic mutations, no major differences were observed in HER2-low vs. HER2-0 tumors, after correcting for ER status (Table 1). Among all mutational events, any mutation in MPL, CYLD, and MAP3K and oncogenic mutations in TP53 and NF1 were more common in HER2-0, while any mutation in MTOR, RAD21, DNMT3A, and PDGFRA were enriched in HER2-low patients, when controlling for ER status and background mutational rate (p&lt; 0.05). However, no mutation reached significance after accounting for multiple hypothesis testing. Similarly, no deep deletion or high amplification CNV events reached significance for either group. Analysis of tumor mutational burden in HER2-low vs. HER-0 tumors revealed no significant differences (median: 7.26 muts/Mb vs. 7.60 muts/Mb, p=1.00), including when accounting for ER status. Finally, among tumors with sufficient tumor purity for ERBB2 copy count analysis (n=374 and 419 for HER2-low and HER2-0, respectively), HER2-low tumors had a significantly higher number of ERBB2 alleles as compared to HER2-0 (&lt; 2 copies, 15.0% vs. 30.9%, 2 copies 67.4% vs. 60.5%, and &gt;2 copies, 17.6% vs. 8.6%; p&lt; 0.001 by Kruskal-Wallis). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest comprehensive genomic analysis of HER2-low MBC to date. In our cohort of patients with HER2-negative MBC, the genomic landscape of HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors did not differ significantly, apart from a higher number of ERBB2 alleles. These data further support the notion that HER2-low, as currently defined, is not a distinct molecular subtype of breast cancer.

Citation Format: Paolo Tarantino, Hersh V. Gupta, Melissa E. Hughes, Janet L. Files, Sarah Strauss, Gregory Kirkner, Anne-Marie Feeney, Yvonne Y. Li, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Brittany Bychkovsky, Laura MacConaill, Neal Lindeman, Bruce Johnson, Matthew Meyerson, Sheheryar Kabraji, Rinath Jeselsohn, Xintao Qiu, Rong Li, Henry W. Long, Eric Winer, Deborah A. Dillon, Giuseppe Curigliano, Andrew Cherniack, Sara Tolaney, Nancy U. Lin. HER2-05 Comprehensive genomic characterization of HER2-low breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-05.

Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer: final 10-year analysis of the open-label, single-arm, phase 2 APT trial

BACKGROUND

We aimed to report on long-term outcomes of patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and to establish potential biomarkers to predict prognosis.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged 18 years or older, with small (≤3 cm), node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, were recruited from 16 institutions in 13 cities in the USA. Eligible patients were given intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m²) with intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose of 4 mg/kg, subsequent doses 2 mg/kg) weekly for 12 weeks, followed by trastuzumab (weekly at 2 mg/kg or once every 3 weeks at 6 mg/kg) for 40 weeks to complete a full year of trastuzumab. The primary endpoint was 3-year invasive disease-free survival. Here, we report 10-year survival outcomes, assessed in all participants who received protocol-defined treatment, with exploratory analyses using the HER2DX genomic tool. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00542451, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 29, 2007, and Sept 3, 2010, 410 patients were enrolled and 406 were given adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab and included in the analysis. Mean age at enrolment was 55 years (SD 10·5), 405 (99·8%) of 406 patients were female and one (0·2%) was male, 350 (86·2%) were White, 28 (6·9%) were Black or African American, and 272 (67·0%) had hormone receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 10·8 years (IQR 7·1-11·4), among 406 patients included in the analysis population, we observed 31 invasive disease-free survival events, of which six (19·4%) were locoregional ipsilateral recurrences, nine (29·0%) were new contralateral breast cancers, six (19·4%) were distant recurrences, and ten (32·3%) were all-cause deaths. 10-year invasive disease-free survival was 91·3% (95% CI 88·3-94·4), 10-year recurrence-free interval was 96·3% (95% CI 94·3-98·3), 10-year overall survival was 94·3% (95% CI 91·8-96·8), and 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 98·8% (95% CI 97·6-100). HER2DX risk score as a continuous variable was significantly associated with invasive disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-unit increment 1·24 [95% CI 1·00-1·52]; p=0·047) and recurrence-free interval (1·45 [1·09-1·93]; p=0·011).

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab is a reasonable treatment standard for patients with small, node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. The HER2DX genomic tool might help to refine the prognosis for this population.

FUNDING

Genentech.

Evolution of biological features of invasive lobular breast cancer: comparison between primary tumor and metastases

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has unique clinical-biological features. Phenotypical differences between primary tumours (PTs) and metastases (M) have been described for invasive ductal carcinoma, but data on ILC are limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed patients with recurrent ILC from our institution from 2013 to 2020. We evaluated the discordance of the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 between PT and M, to understand prognostic and therapeutic implications.

RESULTS

Thirteen percent (n = 91) of all patients had ILC. We observed 15%, 44% and 5% of ER, PgR and HER2 status discordance between PT and M. ER/PgR discordance was related to receptor loss and HER2 mainly due to gain. PT presented a luminal-like phenotype (93%); 6% and 1% were triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive. In M, there was an increase in TNBC (16%) and HER2-positive (5%). Metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) were different according to clinical phenotype, with poorer prognosis for HER2+ and TNBC (p < 0.001); OS after metastatic progression did not differ across phenotypes (p = 0.079). In luminal-like ILC (n = 85) at diagnosis, we found that OS after relapse was poorer in patients experiencing a phenotype switch to TNBC but improved in patients with HER2 gain (p = 0.0028). Poorer survival was reported in patients with a PgR and/or ER expression loss of ≥25%. There was HER2-low enrichment in M1 (from 37% to 58%): this change was not associated with OS (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that phenotype switch after metastatic progression may be associated with patients' outcomes. Tumour biopsy in recurrent ILC could drive treatment decision-making, with prognostic implications.

Abstract PD18-02: Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial (APT) for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive (HER2+) Breast Cancer: final 10-year analysis

Background: The APT trial evaluated the activity of adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab (TH) among patients with small, node negative HER2+ breast cancer. This regimen showed a 7-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) of 93%, a recurrence-free interval (RFI) of 97.5% with only four (1.0%) distant recurrences, and a 7-year overall survival (OS) of 95%. In this end-of-study analysis, we report the survival outcomes at 10 years and assess the role of HER2DX testing in predicting long-term outcomes with adjuvant TH.

Methods: APT was a single-arm multicenter investigator-initiated phase II study in which patients with HER2+ breast cancer with tumors ≤3 cm and negative nodes (one single micrometastatic node allowed) received IV weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with IV weekly trastuzumab for 12 weeks, followed by IV trastuzumab for 9 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year iDFS. Here we report 10-year iDFS, RFI, breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and OS. In an exploratory analysis, the risk of recurrence was evaluated with the HER2DX genomic assay.

Results: A total of 410 patients were enrolled from October 2007 to September 2010, of which 406 started the study treatment and were included in the intent to treat analysis. Median age at enrollment was 55 years (range, 24 to 85 years), and most patients (67%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. Fifty percent of patients had tumors 1.0 cm or smaller and only 9% of patients had tumors between 2 cm to 3 cm. Mean tumor size was 1.1 cm. After a median follow-up of 10.2 years (122 months), 36 iDFS events were observed, consistent with a 10-year iDFS of 89.7% (95% CI, 86.3%-93.1%). Ten-year iDFS was 90.2% (95% CI, 86.3%-94.3%) and 88.5% (95% CI, 82.4%-95.1%) for patients with HR-positive and HR-negative tumors at baseline, respectively. 10-year RFI was 96.8% (95% CI, 95.0%-98.7%), 10-year OS was 94.2% (95% CI, 91.6%-96.8%) and 10-year BCSS was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.1%-100.0%). Of the iDFS events observed in the trial, 6 were non-breast cancer related deaths and 9 were contralateral tumors, all but one locally found to be HER2-negative upon biopsy (Table 1). Among patients experiencing an iDFS event, 7 patients (1.7%) had distant recurrences, including 1 with a T2 tumor, 3 with a T1c tumor and 3 with a T1b tumor. At baseline, 6 of them had HR-positive disease, 1 had HR-negative disease, and 6 had high-grade disease. Upon biopsy of metastatic lesions, 5 of the 7 distant recurrences were locally found to be HER2+, 1 was HER2-negative and 1 had unknown HER2 status. HER2DX testing was conducted on available baseline archival tumor tissue and analyses of patients’ survival outcomes based on the HER2DX score will be presented.

Conclusion: After 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant TH confirmed excellent long-term outcomes for small, node-negative HER2+ breast cancer, with a 10-year RFI of 96.8% and a 10-year BCSS of 99.1%.

Table 1: iDFS events with adjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab after 10.2 years of follow up

Citation Format: Sara Tolaney, Paolo Tarantino, Noah Graham, Nabihah Tayob, Chau T Dang, Denise Yardley, Beverly Moy, Paul K. Marcom, Kathy S. Albain, Hope Rugo, Matthew Ellis, Iuliana Shapira, Antonio C. Wolff, Lisa Carey, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Michelle K. DeMeo, Molly K. DiLullo, Ann Partridge, Adrienne Waks, Clifford Hudis, Ian Krop, Harold Burstein, Aleix Prat, Eric Winer. Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial (APT) for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive (HER2+) Breast Cancer: final 10-year analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD18-02.

HER2-low expression in breast oncology: treatment implications in the smart chemotherapy era

Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancers, defined as tumors exhibiting a HER2 IHC score of 1+ or 2+ nonamplified, represent an emerging targetable entity in the clinicopathologic landscape of breast cancer. Traditionally considered as not sensitive to HER2-targeting agents, these tumors have shown to be susceptible to a new class of drugs, namely antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Indeed, the DESTINY-Breast04 phase 3 trial demonstrated the remarkable activity of trastuzumab deruxtecan for treating both hormone-receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative metastatic breast cancers that show HER2-low expression, reshaping treatment algorithms for these diseases. Concomitantly, the TROPiCS-02 and the ASCENT phase 3 trials have established the role of the anti-Trop-2 ADC sacituzumab govitecan for HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. A careful evaluation of these trials, with their inclusion/exclusion criteria, efficacy and toxicity results, is required in order to understand how best to treat HER2-low metastatic breast cancer in the context of a rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape. The purpose of this narrative review is to recapitulate the available evidence on the use of ADCs in the treatment of HER2-low breast cancer, providing a perspective on their current role in clinical practice.

The HER2-low revolution in breast oncology: steps forward and emerging challenges

Approximately half of breast cancers (BCs), historically categorized as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, have low expression of HER2 defined as an immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization. Retrospective evidence suggest that HER2-low BC does not represent a distinct subtype from a biological and prognostic perspective. Nonetheless, it currently constitutes an essential biomarker to guide treatment selection and its introduction has led to reconsidering the binary classification of HER2 status according to which only patients with HER2-positive BC were thought to derive benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. Trastuzumab deruxtecan has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with HER2-low metastatic BC based on the results of the DESTINY-Breast04 phase III trial, and other antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting HER2 are showing promising results. Treatment paradigms for both triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive BCs exhibiting HER2-low expression are thus rapidly evolving. Given its therapeutic implications, it is essential to accurately recognize the level of HER2 expression, and the development of more sensitive and reliable methods for HER2 testing and scoring is warranted, especially since the minimum threshold of HER2 expression required for T-DXd efficacy is currently under investigation. Given the signs of activity of T-DXd even in patients with HER2-0 (IHC 0) disease, an evolution in the way we define HER2-low is anticipated. Considering the expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium for BC patients, with several ADCs approaching the clinic, research efforts are needed to clarify whether the expression level of targets can enrich for responders to a given ADC as well as to understand mechanisms of resistance with the goal of optimizing the sequencing of ADCs.

Targeting HER3 for cancer treatment: a new horizon for an old target

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) is a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptors family, having as its main ligands neuregulins 1 and 2. Although its poor tyrosine kinase activity entails a weak oncogenic power on its own, HER3 can heterodimerize with HER2 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), leading to a drastic enhancement of transphosphorylation and activation of downstream signaling pathways, ultimately promoting oncogenesis, metastatic dissemination, and drug resistance. Given its ubiquitous expression across solid tumors, multiple efforts have been done to therapeutically target HER3 by blocking either the ligand binding domain or its dimerization with other receptors. Treatment with anti-HER3 monoclonal antibodies or bispecific antibodies, both as single agents and in combination with other compounds, unfortunately led to unsatisfactory results across several tumor types. The HER3-directed delivery of cytotoxic payloads through antibody-drug conjugates has recently demonstrated encouraging activity in several tumor types, however, suggesting a potential role for the therapeutic targeting of HER3 in cancer treatment.

Biology and Treatment of HER2-Low Breast Cancer

Current guidelines recommend a dichotomous classification of HER2 as either positive or negative, to guide clinicians in treatment decisions. Until now, only patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) had been demonstrated to derive clinical benefit from anti-HER2 therapies. However, novel ADCs have recently emerged, with activity in the large population of patients with HER2-low-expressing BC. Although it remains unclear whether HER2-low BC represents a distinct entity, given the therapeutic implication its crucial to accurately distinguish HER2-low from HER2-0 BC. Efforts are needed to standardize HER2 testing in BC and to introduce more sensitive assays to better discriminate HER2 levels.

How I treat HER2-low advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Targeting low levels of human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression has reshaped the treatment paradigm for half of the patients with advanced breast cancer. HER2-low is currently defined as a HER2 immunohistochemical expression of 1+ or 2+ without amplification by in-situ hybridization. Until recently, HER2-targeted agents were ineffective in treating patients with HER2-low disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, we summarize the current management of HER2-low breast cancer. We highlight the findings of the DESTINY-Breast 04 phase 3 trial, which confirmed the efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) for the treatment of patients with advanced, pretreated HER2-low breast cancer. We also discuss how to implement this new treatment option in treatment algorithms of hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative tumors, as well as how to optimally manage selected toxicities of T-DXd.

EXPERT OPINION

T-DXd is currently the standard of care for patients with advanced, pretreated, HER2-low breast cancer. Based on the design of the DESTINY-Breast04 trial, the current optimal place in treatment algorithms is after the first line of chemotherapy, both in HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer. Up to 10-15% of the patients receiving T-DXd are expected to develop interstitial lung disease, which in 1-2% of the cases can be fatal. Adequate monitoring and prompt management are required to minimize the impact of ILD and to safely implement T-DXd in clinical practice.

The Dawn of the Antibody-Drug Conjugates Era: How T-DM1 Reinvented the Future of Chemotherapy for Solid Tumors

Delivering targeted chemotherapy through antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) has emerged as an extremely effective therapeutic strategy for multiple types of cancer. The first agent of this class to be established for treating a solid tumor was trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), approved in 2013 for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Much of the knowledge that led to this approval came from the landmark Cancer Research publication by Lewis Phillips and colleagues in 2008, where they described the in vitro and in vivo efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity of T-DM1, demonstrating its relevant preclinical activity against HER2-positive breast cancer models. In this article, the authors also explored the use of different linkers to conjugate the cytotoxic payload to the trastuzumab vehicle, demonstrating improved stability, efficacy, and tolerability of the compound when adopting a specific thioether linker. The findings from this work not only set the stage for the clinical development of T-DM1, but also highlighted the modularity of ADCs, with small changes in their components able to dramatically impact their activity and toxicity. This finding would prove key for the development of novel ADCs, several of which are now reshaping the way we treat breast cancer and other cancer types. In this commentary, we discuss the key implications of the work by Phillips and colleagues, putting it in context of the current and anticipated expansion in the use of ADCs to treat cancer. See related article by Phillips et al., Cancer Res 2008;68:9280-90.

HER2-low inflammatory breast cancer: Clinicopathologic features and prognostic implications

BACKGROUND

HER2)-low expression is a predictive biomarker for novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. However, little is known about its clinical significance in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative IBC between December 1999 and December 2020 were identified from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute IBC registry. Patients were divided into HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-) and HER2-zero (IHC 0), comparing clinicopathologic features and disease outcomes between the two subgroups.

RESULTS

The study included 276 patients. Among patients with stage III (n = 209) and stage IV (n = 67) IBC, 54% and 39% had HER2-low tumours, respectively. Oestrogen receptor (ER)-expressing tumours were more common in patients with HER2-low versus HER2-zero stage III IBC (65% versus 38%, p < 0.01). Among stage III patients undergoing surgery (n = 182), pathologic complete response (pCR) rates were higher for HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (11% versus 6%, OR: 1.8, 95%CI:0.6-5.3), but minimal differences persisted when separately analysing pCR by ER status. Similar invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) outcomes were observed among ER-positive HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month iDFS: 63% versus 63%, HR: 1.10, 95%CI:0.57-2.13) and ER-negative HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month iDFS: 28% versus 25%, HR: 1.19, 95%CI:0.69-2.04). Differences in overall survival (OS) were small, both among ER-positive HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month OS: 80% versus 81%, HR: 0.82, 95%CI:0.39-1.73) and ER-negative HER2-zero versus HER2-low IBC (48-month OS: 34% versus 47%, HR: 1.34, 95%CI: 0.74-2.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Marginal differences in clinicopathologic features and outcomes were observed in HER2-low versus HER2-zero IBC when controlling for ER status, not supporting the definition of HER2-low as a distinct subtype of IBC.

Management of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer following pembrolizumab-based neoadjuvant therapy: What are the evidences?

New therapy options have changed the treatment landscape of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in recent years. Most patients are candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which helps to downstage the tumor and tailor adjuvant systemic therapy based on pathologic response. Capecitabine, pembrolizumab, and olaparib have been incorporated into the armamentarium of adjuvant treatment for selected patients. The KEYNOTE-522 trial, that demonstrated the benefit of pembrolizumab, given in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvantly after surgery, represented a paradigm shift for early-stage TNBC treatment. Pembrolizumab was continued in the adjuvant setting irrespective of response to neoadjuvant therapy, and other adjuvant therapies were not administered in the trial. Many questions were then raised on the selection of adjuvant therapy regimens for patients with residual disease (RD). Prior to the routine use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), the value of adjuvant capecitabine for patients with RD after neoadjuvant polychemotherapy was demonstrated. Given the poor prognosis of some patients with RD after neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy, while the survival advantage of adding capecitabine during the adjuvant phase of pembrolizumab is unknown, it does appear safe and can be considered. Regarding patients harboring germline BRCA mutations with RD after neoadjuvant ICI-containing regimens, the combination of olaparib with pembrolizumab can be an option based on existing safety data.

Prognostic and Biologic Significance of ERBB2-Low Expression in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Importance

It is unclear whether ERBB2-low breast cancer should be considered an individual biologic subtype distinct from ERBB2-0 breast cancer.

Objective

To investigate whether low ERBB2 expression is associated with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis among patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was conducted using data from a prospectively maintained institutional database on all consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing surgery between January 2016 and March 2021 at Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center. The study included 5235 patients with stage I through III, ERBB2-negative invasive breast cancer. Tumors were classified as ERBB2-low if they had an ERBB2 immunohistochemical (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization assay and ERBB2-0 if they had an ERBB2 IHC score of 0. Data were analyzed from September 2021 through January 2022.

Exposures

Standard treatment according to institutional guidelines.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics and disease outcomes (pathologic complete response rate [pCR], disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival) between patients with ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 breast cancer.

Results

Among 5235 patients with ERBB2-negative invasive breast cancer (5191 [99.2%] women; median [range] age at primary surgery, 59.0 [21.0-95.0] years), 2917 patients (55.7%) and 2318 patients (44.3%) had ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 tumors, respectively. Expression of HR was significantly more common among ERBB2-low compared with ERBB2-0 tumors (2643 patients [90.6%] vs 1895 patients [81.8%]; P < .001). The rate of ERBB2-low tumors increased progressively, from 296 of 739 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (40.1%) to 31 of 67 ER-low (ie, ER 1%-9%) tumors (46.3%), 37 of 67 ER-moderate (ie, ER, 10%-49%) tumors (55.2%), 2047 of 3542 ER-high (ie, ER, 50%-95%) tumors (57.8%), and 499 of 803 ER-very high (ie, ER > 95%) tumors (62.1%) (P < .001). Among 675 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, those with ERBB2-0 tumors experienced higher pCR rates (95 patients [26.8%] vs 53 patients [16.6%]; P = .002). However, there were no statistically significant differences in pCR rate between ERBB2-low and ERBB2-0 tumors when separately analyzing HR-positive, ER-low, HR-positive without ER-low, or TNBC tumors. In exploratory survival analysis, no differences by ERBB2-low expression in disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, or overall survival were observed among patients with HR-positive tumors or TNBC.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study did not support the interpretation of ERBB2-low breast cancer as a distinct biologic subtype. ERBB2-low expression was positively associated with level of ER expression, and ER-low tumors were enriched among ERBB2-0 tumors, suggesting that, given the worse prognosis of ER-low tumors, they may be associated with confounding of prognostic analyses of ERBB2-low expression.

Navigating the HER2-Low Paradigm in Breast Oncology: New Standards, Future Horizons

SUMMARY

The confirmation of the HER2-low paradigm is expected to have a major impact in breast oncology. About half of all breast cancers harbor HER2-low expression, which can be targeted with the anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), leading to a relevant survival benefit in the metastatic setting. Given this observation, treatment algorithms for both hormone receptor-positive and triple-negative breast cancer are expected to significantly evolve in the next future. Several challenges, however, remain in the interpretation of HER2-low expression related to its biological role, its pathologic diagnosis, and the definition itself of HER2-low. In this article, we recapitulate the current knowledge on HER2-low breast cancer, discussing whether it should be considered a distinct subtype, how it should be implemented in the clinic, and how its definition may evolve in the coming years with the evolution of our clinical and translational knowledge.