Two Days Versus Five Days of Postoperative Antibiotics for Complex Appendicitis: Cost Analysis of a Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare costs for 2 days versus 5 days of postoperative antibiotics within the antibiotics after an aPPendectomy In Complex appendicitis trial.Background:Recent studies suggest that restrictive antibiotic use leads to a significant reduction in hospital stays without compromising patient safety. Its potential effect on societal costs remains underexplored.

METHODS

This was a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter clinical trial powered for noninferiority. Patients with complex appendicitis (age ≥ 8 years) were randomly allocated to 2 days or 5 days of intravenous antibiotics after appendectomy. Patient inclusion lasted from June 2017 to June 2021 in 15 Dutch hospitals. The final follow-up was on September 1, 2021. The primary trial endpoint was a composite endpoint of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days. In the present study, the main outcome measures were overall societal costs (comprising direct health care costs and costs related to productivity loss) and cost-effectiveness. Direct health care costs were recorded based on data in the electronic patient files, complemented by a telephone follow-up at 90 days. In addition, data on loss of productivity were acquired through the validated Productivity Cost Questionnaire at 4 weeks after surgery. Cost estimates were based on prices for the year 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 1005 patients were evaluated in the "intention-to-treat" analysis: 502 patients were allocated to the 2-day group and 503 to the 5-day group. The mean difference in overall societal costs was - €625 (95% CI: -€ 958 to -€ 278) to the advantage of the 2-day group. This difference was largely explained by reduced hospital stay. Productivity losses were similar between the study groups. Restricting postoperative antibiotics to 2 days was cost-effective, with estimated cost savings of €31,117 per additional infectious complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Two days of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis results in a statistically significant and relevant cost reduction, as compared with 5 days. Findings apply to laparoscopic appendectomy in a well-resourced health care setting.

Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Formation of an End-colostomy: Long-term Randomized Controlled Trial on Effectiveness and Safety

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine if prophylactic mesh placement is an effective, safe, and cost-effective procedure to prevent parastomal hernia (PSH) formation in the long term.

BACKGROUND

A PSH is the most frequent complication after stoma formation. Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent PSH, but long-term evidence to support this approach is scarce.

METHODS

In this multicentre superiority trial patients undergoing the formation of a permanent colostomy were randomly assigned to either retromuscular polypropylene mesh reinforcement or conventional colostomy formation. Primary endpoint was the incidence of a PSH after 5 years. Secondary endpoints were morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to the mesh group (n = 72) or nonmesh group (n = 78). For the long-term follow-up, 113 patients were analyzed, and 37 patients were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 60 months (interquartile range: 48.6-64.4), 49 patients developed a PSH, 20 (27.8%) in the mesh group and 29 (37.2%) in the nonmesh group ( P = 0.22; RD: -9.4%; 95% CI: -24, 5.5). The cost related to the meshing strategy was € 2.239 lower than the nonmesh strategy (95% CI: 491.18, 3985.49), and quality-adjusted life years did not differ significantly between groups ( P = 0.959; 95% CI: -0.066, 0.070).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic mesh placement during the formation of an end-colostomy is a safe procedure but does not reduce the incidence of PSH after 5 years of follow-up. It does, however, delay the onset of PSH without a significant difference in morbidity, mortality, or quality of life, and seems to be cost-effective.

Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue

INTRODUCTION

Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences.

METHODS

TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment.

RESULTS

FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4).

CONCLUSION

Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.

2 days versus 5 days of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis: a pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis is unclear. The increasing global threat of antimicrobial resistance warrants restrictive antibiotic use, which could also reduce side-effects, length of hospital stay, and costs.

METHODS

In this pragmatic, open-label, non-inferiority trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands, patients with complex appendicitis (aged ≥8 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2 days or 5 days of intravenous antibiotics after appendicectomy. Randomisation was stratified by centre, and treating physicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days. The main outcome was the absolute risk difference (95% CI) in the primary endpoint, adjusted for age and severity of appendicitis, with a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. Outcome assessment was based on electronic patient records and a telephone consultation 90 days after appendicectomy. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Safety outcomes were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NL5946.

FINDINGS

Between April 12, 2017, and June 3, 2021, 13 267 patients were screened and 1066 were randomly assigned, 533 to each group. 31 were excluded from intention-to-treat analysis of the 2-day group and 30 from the 5-day group owing to errors in recruitment or consent. Appendicectomy was done laparoscopically in 955 (95%) of 1005 patients. The telephone follow-up was completed in 664 (66%) of 1005 patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 51 (10%) of 502 patients analysed in the 2-day group and 41 (8%) of 503 patients analysed in the 5-day group (adjusted absolute risk difference 2·0%, 95% CI -1·6 to 5·6). Rates of complications and re-interventions were similar between trial groups. Fewer patients had adverse effects of antibiotics in the 2-day group (45 [9%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (112 [22%] of 503 patients; odds ratio [OR] 0·344, 95% CI 0·237 to 0·498). Re-admission to hospital was more frequent in the 2-day group (58 [12%] of 502 patients) than in the 5-day group (29 [6%] of 503 patients; OR 2·135, 1·342 to 3·396). There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

2 days of postoperative intravenous antibiotics for complex appendicitis is non-inferior to 5 days in terms of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days, based on a non-inferiority margin of 7·5%. These findings apply to laparoscopic appendicectomy conducted in a well resourced health-care setting. Adopting this strategy will reduce adverse effects of antibiotics and length of hospital stay.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

Background

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.

Methods

This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.

Results

Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.

Conclusion

The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.

O01 PROPHYLACTIC MESH PLACEMENT DURING FORMATION OF AN END-COLOSTOMY LONG TERM RCT ON EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY

Aim

To determine if prophylactic mesh placement is an effective, safe, and cost-effective procedure to prevent parastomal hernia (PSH) formation in the long term.

Material and Methods

In this multicenter superiority trial patients undergoing formation of a permanent colostomy were randomly assigned to either retromuscular mesh reinforcement or conventional colostomy formation. The primary endpoint was the incidence of a PSH after 5 years. Secondary endpoints were morbidity, mortality, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.

Results

A total of 150 patients were randomly assigned to the mesh group (n = 72) or non-mesh group (n = 78). For the long term follow up, we could analyse 113 patients since 37 patients were lost to follow-up. After a median follow-up of 60 months (IQR 48.6 – 64.4), 49 patients developed a PSH, 20 (27.8%) in the mesh group and 29 (37.2%) in the non-mesh group (p = 0.22; 95% CI -24 – 5.5). A total of 25 patients developed an incisional hernia, seven in the mesh group (10.4%) versus 18 in the non-mesh group (27.2%) (p = 0.013, 95% CI 3.5 – 30.0). No relevant differences were found in quality of life or cost-effectiveness between both study group.

Conclusions

Use of a prophylactic retromuscular mesh at the ostomy site delays but not reduces the incidence of PSH after 5 years of follow-up. It leads to less severe PSH according to the EHS and MM classification with fewer repairs needed. Furthermore it causes patients to have fewer stoma related complications necessitating change of appliances and it is safe without any adverse events or increase in morbidity.

Missed injuries in trauma patients: the value of a diagnostic thoracotomy or thoracoscopy during surgical stabilisation of rib fractures

PURPOSE

Over the last decade Surgical Stabilisation of Rib Fractures (SSFR) gained popularity in our hospital. With increased numbers, we noted that frequently injuries were missed during primary/secondary survey and radiological imaging that were found during the surgical procedure. With this observation, the research question was formulated: What is the value of diagnostics thoracotomy or thoracoscopy during surgical stabilisation of rib fractures?

METHODS

In a single-centre, retrospective study between February 2010 and December 2019, trauma patients who underwent Surgical Stabilisation of Rib Fractures (SSFR) and an inspection thoracotomy were included. All radiological injuries were compared with intraoperative findings. Missed injuries that were discovered during the surgical procedure that were not analysed during primary/secondary survey or on radiological imaging were recorded and retrospectively analysed by an independent radiologist.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were included. Eight patients had additional injuries; all had a diaphragmatic rupture, one patient had an additional stomach laceration, and another patient had a significant lung laceration in need of surgical repair. On a CT scan there are 7 signs of predictive value for a diaphragmatic rupture. Only 13 out of the total of 56 diaphragm rupture CT signs were confirmed on the primary CT scans of the eight patients with diaphragmatic injuries; therefore, still 77% of signs could not be confirmed by initial radiological findings.

CONCLUSION

With the recent shift towards surgical stabilisation of rib fractures, an inspection thoracoscopy or thoracotomy during SSFR should be considered to minimise the incidence of missed intrathoracic injuries requiring early or late surgical treatment.

A patient- and assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) in patients with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer patients is infamous for its accompanying morbidity. Selective preservation of upper extremity lymphatic drainage and accompanying lymph nodes crossing the axillary basin - currently resected during a standard ALND - has been proposed as a valuable surgical refinement.

METHODS

Peroperative Axillary Reversed Mapping (ARM) was used for selective preservation of upper extremity lymphatic drainage. A multicentre patient- and assessor-blinded randomized study was performed in clinical node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer patients. Patients were randomized to undergo either standard-ALND or ARM-ALND. Primary outcome was the presence of surgery-related lymphedema at six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included patient reported and objective signs and symptoms of lymphedema, pain, paraesthesia, numbness, loss of shoulder mobility, quality of life and axillary recurrence risk.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between both groups using the water displacement method with respect to measured lymphedema. ARM-ALND resulted in less reported complaints of lymphedema at six, 12 and 24 months postoperatively (p < 0.05). No axillary recurrence was found in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to results of volumetric measurement, patient reported outcomes support selective sparing of the upper extremity lymphatic drainage using ARM as valuable surgical refinement in case of ALND in clinically node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer. If completion ALND in clinically node negative, sentinel node positive early breast cancer is considered, selective sparing of upper extremity axillary lymphatics by implementing ARM should be carried out in order to reduce morbidity.

Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

International guidelines advise laparoscopic cholecystectomy to treat symptomatic, uncomplicated gallstones. Usual care regarding cholecystectomy is associated with practice variation and persistent post-cholecystectomy pain in 10-41% of patients. We aimed to compare the non-inferiority of a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection with usual care to assess (in)efficient use of cholecystectomy.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority study in 24 academic and non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. We enrolled patients aged 18-95 years with abdominal pain and ultrasound-proven gallstones or sludge. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either usual care in which selection for cholecystectomy was left to the discretion of the surgeon, or a restrictive strategy with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy. For the restrictive strategy, cholecystectomy was advised for patients who fulfilled all five pre-specified criteria of the triage instrument: 1) severe pain attacks, 2) pain lasting 15-30 min or longer, 3) pain located in epigastrium or right upper quadrant, 4) pain radiating to the back, and 5) a positive pain response to simple analgesics. Randomisation was done with an online program, implemented into a web-based application using blocks of variable sizes, and stratified for centre (academic versus non-academic and a high vs low number of patients), sex, and body-mass index. Physicians and patients were masked for study-arm allocation until after completion of the triage instrument. The primary, non-inferiority, patient-reported endpoint was the proportion of patients who were pain-free at 12 months' follow-up, analysed by intention to treat and per protocol. A 5% non-inferiority margin was chosen, based on the estimated clinically relevant difference. Safety analyses were also done in the intention-to treat population. This trial is registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4022.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 5, 2014, and April 25, 2017, we included 1067 patients for analysis: 537 assigned to usual care and 530 to the restrictive strategy. At 12 months' follow-up 298 patients (56%; 95% CI, 52·0-60·4) were pain-free in the restrictive strategy group, compared with 321 patients (60%, 55·6-63·8) in usual care. Non-inferiority was not shown (difference 3·6%; one-sided 95% lower CI -8·6%; p_{non-inferiority}=0·316). According to a secondary endpoint analysis, the restrictive strategy resulted in significantly fewer cholecystectomies than usual care (358 [68%] of 529 vs 404 [75%] of 536; p=0·01). There were no between-group differences in trial-related gallstone complications (40 patients [8%] of 529 in usual care vs 38 [7%] of 536 in restrictive strategy; p=0·16) and surgical complications (74 [21%] of 358 vs 88 [22%] of 404, p=0·77), or in non-trial-related serious adverse events (27 [5%] of 529 vs 29 [5%] of 526).

INTERPRETATION

Suboptimal pain reduction in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain was noted with both usual care and following a restrictive strategy for selection for cholecystectomy. However, the restrictive strategy was associated with fewer cholecystectomies. The findings should encourage physicians involved in the care of patients with gallstones to rethink cholecystectomy, and to be more careful in advising a surgical approach in patients with gallstones and abdominal symptoms.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, and CZ healthcare insurance.

Treatment of Postparotidectomy Fistulae with Fibrin Glue

Although fistulae resulting from superficial parotidectomy represent a serious problem, there is still little consensus on the optimal treatment. Some suggest management by applying dressings, while others advise surgery. In recent years several other strategies have been proposed. In this manuscript, we present two cases of postparotidectomy fistulae treated by injection with fibrin tissue glue (Tissucol® Duo 500, Baxter AG, Vienna, Austria). Furthermore, a review of the literature is presented. In both patients the fistulae completely healed within months without complications. A literature search revealed that this is the first time postparotidectomy fistulae were treated this way. We conclude that postparotidectomy fistulae can be effectively treated with fibrin glue. Moreover, this treatment is simple, safe and has no side effects.

Two versus five days of antibiotics after appendectomy for complex acute appendicitis (APPIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common indications for emergency surgery. In patients with a complex appendicitis, prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended after appendectomy. There is no consensus regarding the optimum duration of antibiotics. Guidelines propose 3 to 7 days of treatment, but shorter courses may be as effective in the prevention of infectious complications. At the same time, the global issue of increasing antimicrobial resistance urges for optimization of antibiotic strategies. The aim of this study is to determine whether a short course (48 h) of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to current standard practice of 5 days.

Methods

Patients of 8 years and older undergoing appendectomy for acute complex appendicitis – defined as a gangrenous and/or perforated appendicitis or appendicitis in presence of an abscess – are eligible for inclusion. Immunocompromised or pregnant patients are excluded, as well as patients with a contraindication to the study antibiotics. In total, 1066 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the experimental treatment arm (48 h of postoperative intravenously administered (IV) antibiotics) or the control arm (5 days of postoperative IV antibiotics). After discharge from the hospital, patients participate in a productivity-cost-questionnaire at 4 weeks and a standardized telephone follow-up at 90 days after appendectomy. The primary outcome is a composite endpoint of infectious complications, including intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and surgical site infection (SSI), and mortality within 90 days after appendectomy. Secondary outcomes include IAA, SSI, restart of antibiotics, length of hospital stay (LOS), reoperation, percutaneous drainage, readmission rate, and cost-effectiveness. The non-inferiority margin for the difference in the primary endpoint rate is set at 7.5% (one-sided test at ɑ 0.025). Both per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses will be performed.

Discussion

This trial will provide evidence on whether 48 h of postoperative antibiotics is non-inferior to a standard course of 5 days of antibiotics. If non-inferiority is established, longer intravenous administration following appendectomy for complex appendicitis can be abandoned, and guidelines need to be adjusted accordingly.

Trial registration

Dutch Trial Register, NTR6128. Registered on 20 December 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2629-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional recovery is shorter after MIDP compared with ODP even in an enhanced recovery setting.

METHODS

LEOPARD is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, patient-blinded, multicenter, superiority trial in all 17 centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. A total of 102 patients with symptomatic benign, premalignant or malignant disease will be randomly allocated to undergo MIDP or ODP in an enhanced recovery setting. The primary outcome is time (days) to functional recovery, defined as all of the following: independently mobile at the preoperative level, sufficient pain control with oral medication alone, ability to maintain sufficient (i.e. >50%) daily required caloric intake, no intravenous fluid administration and no signs of infection. Secondary outcomes are operative and postoperative outcomes, including clinically relevant complications, mortality, quality of life and costs.

DISCUSSION

The LEOPARD trial is designed to investigate whether MIDP reduces the time to functional recovery compared with ODP in an enhanced recovery setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Dutch Trial Register, NTR5188 . Registered on 9 April 2015.

Maggot Debridement Therapy in the Palliative Setting

Success rates of Maggot Debridement Therapy (MDT) differ, but range from 70% to 80%. In this article it is argued that wound closure is not always feasible and is not always the aim of the treatment. A patient is described in whom the intent of MDT was not wound closure, but infection removal, reduction of odor, and eventually prevention of a below knee amputation. This succeeded: the pain was diminished, the odor reduced, and the wound showed signs of healing. Still the patient died. In maggot literature, as with other wound treatments, outcome is recorded as closed or as failed. In our opinion, MDT has other indications besides wound closure.

Deep Infection After Ilioinguinal Node Dissection: Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy?

Wound infection rates after ilioinguinal node dissection are high; 9% to 16% have been reported. The authors report a patient who underwent an ilioinguinal node dissection for a regional metastasized melanoma. Unfortunately, a deep wound infection occurred with extensive skin necrosis and production of abundant wound fluid (750 cc daily). Despite 6-daily dressings, the wound deteriorated, necessitating further operative debridement. In theatre, the authors failed to identify the lymphatic fistula and therefore were unable to close it. In accordance with literature on treatment of groin infections after vascular prosthesis, vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy was started. After 11 days of VAC therapy, the lymphatic leakage completely stopped. Concurrent successful management of the wound with split skin graft therapy led to a complete closure of the wound. The treatment was not painful, changes of the sponge could be done in the ward, and there were no complications.

A phrygian cap

A Phrygian cap is a congenital anomaly of the gallbladder with an incidence of 4%. It can simulate a mass in the liver during hepatobiliary imaging and is sometimes mistaken for pathology. A Phrygian cap, however, has no pathological significance and normally causes no symptoms. A case will be presented where a Phrygian cap was found by coincidence during surgery. The patient was operated for colon cancer with liver metastasis in segment V. He underwent a simultaneous right hemicolectomy and wedge resection of the liver lesion. During perioperative inspection, a gallbladder with a folded fundus was seen. This deformity was, in retrospective, detected on the preoperative MRI scan. The patient underwent cholecystectomy to make the wedge resection easier to perform. Otherwise, cholecystectomy for a Phrygian cap is only indicated in case of symptoms. Radiographic imaging can be helpful in narrowing the differential diagnosis. To our knowledge, there is no recent literature about the Phrygian cap and its imaging aspects. Nowadays, multiphase MRI, or multiphase CT in case of MRI contraindication, are the first choices of hepatobiliary imaging.

A black perforated esophagus treated with surgery: Report of a case

A case of a perforated black esophagus treated with minimal invasive surgery is presented. A 68-year-old women underwent a right-sided hemihepatectomy and radio frequency ablation of two metastasis in the left liver lobe. Previous history revealed a hemicolectomy for an obstructive colon carcinoma with post-operative chemotherapy. Postoperatively she developed severe dyspnea due to a perforation of the esophagus with leakage to the pleural space. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to adequately drain the perforation was performed. Gastroscopy revealed a perforated black esophagus. The black esophagus, acute esophageal necrosis or Gurvits syndrome is a rare entity with an unknown aetiology which is likely to be multifactorial. The estimated mortality rate is high. To our knowledge, this is the first case published of early VATS used in a case of perforated black esophagus.

[Sternoclavicular joint tuberculosis]

A 24-year old woman presented with an abscess localized at the median side of the right clavicle. There were no clinical signs of tuberculosis and radiological evaluation was normal. PCR-assay on tuberculosis following aspiration of the pus collection was positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. She responded well on regular anti-tuberculosis treatment.

[A 40-year old male presented with a painful cord running over his chest]

This disease, Mondor's disease, is a self-limiting disease caused by a thrombophlebitis of the superficial epigastric and thoracic veins. In this case repetitive injury sustained from running was probably the cause.

[A measurable connection between preventative interventions and the incidence of postoperative wound infection]

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether there was a link between the preventative interventions executed and two groups of patients: those with and those without a postoperative wound infection (POWI).

DESIGN

Descriptive and comparative research.

METHOD

At Rijnland Hospital, a Dutch non-academic teaching hospital, 284 indicator operations were carried out between 1 April 2009 and 31 March 2010. We investigated whether preventative interventions were carried out during these operations. The types of surgery included mastectomy with and without axillary node dissection, resection of the colon and central vascular surgery (reconstruction of the aorta via an endovascular or open approach). Four types of intervention were studied: hygienic discipline (measurement of the number of times the operating theatre doors moved), the timely administration of preoperative antibiotic prophylactics, the avoidance of preoperative shaving and the attempts at perioperative normothermia. A 'postoperative wound infection' was registered as such if it had developed within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 22 POWIs (7.7%) were registered, arising from 284 operations: 5 POWIs (2.8%) after mammary surgery, 1 POWI (2.8%) after central vascular surgery, and 16 POWIs (21.6%) after colon surgery, respectively (see table 2). Meeting the criteria of all 4 types of intervention had no influence on the development of a POWI. A significant association to the development of a POWI was, however, determined to be the variables related to wound classification, duration of surgery and the average number of door movements per hour during surgery; specifically, 7 or more.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance by way of registration and feedback of interventions and their optimisation, particularly in terms of door movement, can possibly contribute to a reduction in the number of postoperative would infections.

Stomal mucocutaneous dehiscence as a complication of a dynamic wound closure system following laparostomy: a case report

Dynamic retention suture techniques that allow gradual reapproximation of abdominal midline muscles and fascia as well as sufficient freedom of movement for breathing and patient care commonly are used to prevent lateral retraction of the abdominal fascia in patients whose abdominal wound closure must be delayed. A 58-year-old otherwise healthy man was admitted with severe abdominal sepsis and following surgery, which included the creation of a stoma, a dynamic wound closure system was applied. Mucocutaneous stomal dehiscence was observed a few days after starting the treatment. The complication was believed to have occurred as a result of traction on the proximal end of the stoma (the bowel inside the abdomen) due to tension on the sutures of the small part of the bowel outside the abdomen. Definite, primary closure of the abdominal fascia was achieved after 16 days, at which point the stoma was reinserted with good results. Since using a modified procedure that involves cutting a groove in the protective drape and carefully placing two flaps around the stoma, this complication has not been observed with similar patients in the authors' facility. This complication is not unique to this wound closure system; it also has been reported with other treatment modalities such as negative pressure wound therapy. The relatively small number of patients requiring delayed closure of the abdomen, coupled with the uniqueness of each case due to a wide variety of indications and comorbidities, hampers the development of evidence-based guidelines of care for these patients. A worldwide data exchange that includes patient experiences and descriptions of successful and failed attempts to address problems and complications in these patients is necessary. In the meantime, experiences with these types of wounds need to be shared in the literature.

Use of Cadaveric Donor Skin to Predict Success of a Definitive Split-thickness Skin Graft in Complicated Wounds

Split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) are used for covering large wound beds. This procedure is sometimes postponed due to a positive culture swab. In those cases, prolonged antibiotic therapy is advised. The present study shows that if a temporary cadaveric donor skin has good take, antibiotic therapy is not necessary and a normal STSG can be performed directly with acceptable results.

METHODS

Cadaveric donor skin was applied in 35 consecutive patients. If the cadaveric donor skin had a good take (adherence) to the wound bed, the patient was scheduled for a STSG. In cases where the cadaveric donor skin failed to take, the definitive skin graft procedure was postponed. In six consecutive cases the cadaveric donor skin was evaluated for possible pathological changes.

RESULTS

In 25 out of 35 patients the cadaveric donor skin had full take. In 22 of these 25 patients a STSG was performed, which led to 91% complete graft take rate. These patients were not treated routinely with antibiotics and if they were treated, surgery was not postponed.

CONCLUSION

Delaying STSG while waiting for swab culture results is not necessary if the cadaveric donor skin has good take 3 days after application; in such cases, the take (attachment) of a STSG in a complicated set of patients is > 90%. The cadaveric donor skin, with positive take, showed more granulocytic influx in the epidermal layer and more vitality than those with no adherence to the wound bed. Vascular in-growth was not noted in any of the cases .

A Case of Intrathoracic Stomach and Spleen After Aortic Repair: An Unusual Complication

A patient is described who presented with an intrathoracic stomach and spleen two weeks after aortic repair for an aortoduodenal fistula. At an urgent laparotomy the stomach was repositioned and the spleen removed. The patient recovered fully. The possible mechanism of this severe complication is discussed and relevant literature reviewed.

Coping Strategies Used By Patients With Chronic and/or Complex Wounds 

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate coping strategies used by patients with chronic and/or complex wounds treated in an outpatient wound clinic.

METHODS

Coping strategies were assessed using the Utrecht Coping List (UCL). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was used to assess the patient's cognitive functioning. Fifty patients were selected for this study. The wound etiologies studied were: diabetic foot ulcers, lower extremity ulcers, surgical wounds, trauma wounds, and pressure ulcers.

RESULTS

Scores on the coping measure for men and women differed significantly from the control groups. It was also found that each wound etiology showed a preference toward different coping strategies. Furthermore, 28% of the studied group had a lowered score on the MMSE, indicating possible cognitive impairments.

CONCLUSION

There might be an association between wound etiology and the coping strategy that is preferred; this knowledge could be used to guide treatment strategies used by clinicians. Further research could focus on the effects of coping strategies on wound healing rates .

Stomal mucocutaneous dehiscence as a complication of topical negative pressure used to treat an open abdomen: a case series

Although mucocutaneous dehiscence in cases of laparostomies is rare, this complication occurred in three patients in The Netherlands (all men, 53 to 65 years old) who received topical negative pressure (TNP) therapy in the management of open abdomens. Two patients experienced anastomotic failure following colonic resection and one had iatrogenic suturing of the small bowel to the fascia. TNP therapy was initiated and stomal dehiscence occurred after 2 to 3 days, contaminating the area. All patients developed sepsis and one died. Two required numerous additional surgeries and antibiotic treatments for 6 and 8 months, respectively. The complication was believed to have occurred as a result of tension on the proximal bowel of the stoma (the bowel inside the abdomen) not due to tension on the sutures or the small part of the bowel outside the abdomen. A modified TNP procedure, consisting of careful placement of the primary dressing around the stoma using separate primary dressing flaps, has since been used without complications in one patient. With implementation of TNP increasing and because of concerns regarding its use, additional research and innovative, simple solutions to manage complex wounds such as the one presented here are needed.

Circumferential application of VAC on a large degloving injury on the lower extremity

Full healing was achieved following the circumferential application of VAC therapy to prepare a large lower-extremity wound involving both soft-tissue injury and femoral fractures for grafting. No complications were reported.

Isolated apophyseal avulsion of the coracoid process: case report and review of literature

Apophyseal fractures occur due to direct trauma or avulsion due to a sudden and violent contraction of muscles. In this case report an isolated apophyseal fracture of the coracoid process is described, which has not been described before in English literature, together with a review of current literature.

Maggot debridement therapy of infected ulcers: patient and wound factors influencing outcome - a study on 101 patients with 117 wounds

INTRODUCTION

It has been known for centuries that maggots are potent debriding agents capable of removing necrotic tissue and slough. In January 2004, the US Food and Drug Administration decided to regulate maggot debridement therapy (MDT). As it is still not clear which wounds are likely or unlikely to benefit from MDT, we performed a prospective study to gain more insight in patient and wound characteristics influencing outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the period between August 2002 and December 2005, patients with infected wounds with signs of gangrenous or necrotic tissue who seemed suited for MDT were enrolled in the present study. In total, 101 patients with 117 ulcers were treated. Most wounds were worst-case scenarios, in which maggot therapy was a treatment of last resort.

RESULTS

In total, 72 patients (71%) were classified as ASA III or IV. In total, 78 of 116 wounds (67%) had a successful outcome. These wounds healed completely (n = 60), healed almost completely (n = 12) or were clean at least (n = 6) at last follow-up. These results seem to be in line with those in the literature. All wounds with a traumatic origin (n = 24) healed completely. All wounds with septic arthritis (n = 13), however, failed to heal and led in half of these cases to a major amputation. According to a multivariate analysis, chronic limb ischaemia (odds ratio [OR], 7.5), the depth of the wound (OR, 14.0), and older age (>or= 60 years; OR, 7.3) negatively influenced outcome. Outcome was not influenced by gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, ASA-classification, location of the wound, wound size or wound duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patient characteristics (i. e. gender, obesity, smoking behaviour, presence of diabetes mellitus and ASA-classification at presentation) and some wound characteristics (i. e. location of the wound, wound duration and size) do not seem to contra-indicate eligibility for MDT. However, older patients and patients with chronic limb ischaemia or deep wounds are less likely to benefit from MDT. Septic arthritis does not seem to be a good indication for MDT.

Extracellular matrix prevents split-skin grafting in selected cases

Surgeons at a Dutch wound clinic close open wounds with split-skin grafts. Concerns about the risk of postoperative complications in some patients led them to find an alternative option. Use of an extracellular matrix dressing was effective.

Extracellular Wound Matrix (OASIS®): Exploring the Contraindications. Results of Its Use in 32 Consecutive Outpatient Clinic Cases

Background. In the authors' experience re-epithelialization after successful debridement and granulation can be the most difficult part of the wound closure process. Extracellular matrix products represent a possible solution. However, in studies discussing the effectiveness of extracellular wound matrix (porcine-derived small intestine submucosa [SIS], [OASIS® Wound Matrix, Healthpoint Ltd, Fort Worth, Tex]), a long list of exclusion criteria has been presented. The present study was designed to explore the contraindications of OASIS Wound Matrix.

METHODS

In this study, 32 patients in whom the wounds were fully debrided and granulated were treated with weekly applications of the wound matrix. The exclusion criteria formulated in the reported literature were followed. Seven different outcomes were defined. Various patient and wound characteristics that might influence outcome were recorded.

RESULTS

Beneficial outcomes were seen in 80.6 % (n = 25) of the patients. The two main complications seen were infection and hypergranulation tissue. Infection was seen in 7 patients (22.6%). Four patients (57.1%) had an unsuccessful outcome. Hypergranulation tissue occurred in another 7 patients (22.6%) after a couple of applications. They all had a beneficial outcome.

CONCLUSION

Much of the exclusion criteria used in previous reports are too strict. Infection should be the only absolute contraindication for starting treatment with OASIS, and it is a good reason to discontinue treatment with an ECM. Hypergranulation tissue (22.6%) is an easily treatable complication that has no negative influence on outcome. Some wounds (77.4%) had no complications, or had easily treatable complications that did not negatively influence the outcome.

A Non-healing Sinus of the Lower Leg 5 Years After Vacuum-assisted Closure Therapy Due To a Gossypiboma

Since its introduction, vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.® Therapy™, KCI, San Antonio,Tex) therapy has proven to be an adequate and noninvasive method in the treatment of complicated wounds. Vacuumassisted closure can be used in the treatment of many types of chronic wounds, such as venous stasis ulcers, pressure ulcers, dehisced surgical wounds, arterial and diabetic ulcers, and a wide variety of miscellaneous, long-existing wounds. Although complications related to its use are rare; localized superficial skin irritation is the most common complication reported in the literature. Further complications involve pain, infection, bleeding, and fluid depletion. Although rare, severe complications, such as toxic shock syndrome, anaerobic sepsis, or thrombosis have been reported. This case report presents an unusual complication of vacuum-assisted closure therapy, which to the authors' knowledge has only once been reported in the literature.

Maggot Debridement Therapy in Necrotizing Fasciitis Reduces the Number of Surgical Debridements

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rare but potentially lethal bacterial infection of the fascial and subcutaneous tissues. Mortality rates of this condition remain high, ranging from 6%-76%. Bacterial cultures may show a wide variety of organisms, but Group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) is the causative agent in up to 71% of all human cases. The treatment consists of urgent radical surgical debridement in combination with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) has been proven to be very effective in the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections. The present study reports on the results of 15 patients with necrotizing fasciitis treated with surgical debridement and antibiotic therapy in combination with MDT from November 2001 to November 2005. A detailed case report of 1 patient is presented.

Perforation of the esophagus caused by the insertion of an intragastric balloon for the treatment of obesity

Obesity is an enduring chronic disease, with multifactorial etiology. Many procedures and solutions have been proposed in the last 25 years. If patients do not meet the criteria for bariatric surgery, intragastric balloons may be used to achieve weight reduction. Contraindications to balloon therapy are a large hiatal hernia, severe esophagitis, peptic ulceration and previous gastric surgery. Although intragastric balloons are advocated as safe devices, major complications such as intestinal obstruction, gastric perforation and gastric ulceration have been described. We report a case of esophageal rupture due to insertion of an intragastric balloon for the treatment of morbid obesity, for which no contraindication existed. When abnormal pain or discomfort arises, or esophageal damage is noted after insertion of an intragastric balloon, patients must be closely monitored to diagnose a possible esophageal rupture early and thereby prevent severe complications.

[Diagnostic image (291). A man with a distended abdomen]

A 52-year-old mentally retarded man with abdominal distension had a volvulus of the sigmoid, with a 'bird beak' sign on a plain abdominal radiograph.

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection of the Thigh: Consider an Abdominal Cause

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) is a disastrous infection of the subcutaneous tissue and underlying fascial layers. Even if urgent treatment is started, mortality rates are high. Due to the paucity of specific cutaneous signs, early recognition is extremely difficult. This in turn causes a delay in diagnosis and worsens prognosis. Although NSTI can develop after a wide variety of causes, specific clues such as initial gram staining and a high index of suspicion should alert the clinician to an abdominal causative agent, which alters surgical treatment strategy. If detected early, prognosis for the patient is improved.

METHODS

Four patients with NSTI of the thigh due to an abdominal origin are detailed regarding their clinical presentation, gram stain or culture, abdominal focus, and treatment. Based on our clinical experience and a review of the relevant literature, we address clinical challenges and controversies of importance.

RESULTS

Current literature on NSTI recommends prompt surgical debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Our cases revealed that an abdominal focus is not uncommon; however, it can be easily missed, which delays treatment. All cases demonstrated polymicrobial gram stains and cultures, which can raise suspicion of and lead to determination of an abdominal focus.

CONCLUSIONS

High clinical suspicion or a polymicrobial gram stain or culture should quickly lead to determination of an abdominal source. Early surgical exploration and focus treatment, together with prompt surgical debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, could reduce mortality significantly.

Development of a clinical decision tool for suspected scaphoid fractures

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures; their overall incidence is however low. Missing a scaphoid fracture may lead to a non-union with a possible disastrous outcome for the patient; for this reason, treatment of a suspected scaphoid fracture, even without a proven fracture on the first radiograph, has been conservative with plaster treatment. There are many clinical tests developed to diagnose a scaphoid fracture. However not all tests are equally practical, and their sensitivity and specificity are not always known, or are very low. In this study 18 clinical tests were evaluated and a subset of 7 tests remained, which were found to be practical and/or had a high enough sensitivity. A clinical decision protocol was developed using a combination of these seven tests, in order to improve diagnostic accuracy and at the same time reduce unnecessary plaster cast treatment of patients with a suspected scaphoid, who turn out to only have a sprained wrist.

Pilot study evaluating a clinical decision tool on suspected scaphoid fractures

In an earlier study we have proposed a scaphoid decision-protocol in order to improve diagnostic accuracy in case of suspected scaphoid fractures. This pilot study evaluated this protocol. In this pilot study (n = 31) most cases with clinical suspicion of scaphoid fractures reached a positive test result on the combined 7 clinical tests (93.5%). Using this test combination, no scaphoid fractures were missed (no false-negatives; sensitivity 100%), but it also included many patients with no scaphoid fracture. Many of these, however, were found to have another fracture. In total, 48% had a scaphoid fracture, 19% another fracture and 32% no fracture. In the pilot study the proposed protocol seems to be a safe protocol, without missing scaphoid fractures. It leads to a reduction of unnecessary plaster casting of sprained wrists and produces a marked reduction in plain radiographic examinations.