1
|
Schmidt CC, Rodriguez-Alejandro OE, Cooke SP, Dworkin JD, Cook AJ, Buce JG, Stefko JM, Cline NS, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. Relative contributions of the supraspinatus cord and strap tendons to shoulder abduction and translation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024; 33:172-180. [PMID: 37543280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The supraspinatus (SS) is formed by a larger anterior bipennate muscle with a cord-like tendon and a posterior unipennate muscle with a strap-like tendon. There is a tendinous connection between the 2 SS subunits. Yet, the relative mechanical contribution of the SS cord and SS strap musculotendinous units to load transmission and subsequent shoulder abduction force is unknown. We hypothesized that a simulated SS cord vs. an SS strap tear would generate less shoulder abduction force and, further, an intact SS cord would offset the expected abduction loss from an SS strap tear, but the inverse would not be true. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested in a shoulder simulator with physiological load vectors applied to the upper and lower subscapularis, SS cord, SS strap, infraspinatus, and teres minor. The roles of the SS cord and SS strap muscles were delineated by varying their loads, while keeping constant loads on other muscles. The randomized testing trials included a native condition and 4 test cases that simulated tears by dropping the load and force transfer via the SS cord-to-SS strap connection by adding the load. Testing was completed at both 0° and 30° of abduction. During each test, shoulder abduction force, rotator cuff strains, and humeral translation were measured. RESULTS Simulated isolated SS cord and SS strap tears led to a significantly lower shoulder abduction force (P < .001). A simulated cord tear at 0° and 30° reduced the abduction force by 53% and 38%, respectively. A simulated strap tear at 0° and 30° dropped the abduction force by 27% and 23%, respectively. The decline in the abduction force was larger for the SS cord tear vs. SS strap tear (P ≤ .001). An SS cord tear with full-load transfer to the strap was able to recover to native values at both 0° and 30° (P ≥ .288). Likewise, an SS strap tear with full-load transfer to the SS cord showed a similar recovery to native values at both 0° and 30° (P ≥ .155). During full-load transfer, the tendon strain followed the loading pattern. An SS cord tear or SS strap tear did not cause a change in humeral translation (P ≥ .303). DISCUSSION The mechanical findings support the efficacy of nonoperative treatment of small (<10 mm) SS tears,11 because an intact SS strap tendon can effectively offset the abduction loss of a torn SS cord tear and vice versa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Omar E Rodriguez-Alejandro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sean P Cooke
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joshua D Dworkin
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sky Lakes Medical Center, Klamath Falls, OR, USA
| | - Austin J Cook
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin G Buce
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph M Stefko
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Noah S Cline
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark C Miller
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dworkin JD, Schmidt CC, Cooke SP, Buce JG, Cook AJ, Miller MC, Smolinski PJ. The Pathoanatomy of Atraumatic Partial Distal Biceps Tears, A Cadaveric Study. JSES Int 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
3
|
Schmidt CC, Spicer CS, Papadopoulos DV, Delserro SM, Tomizuka Y, Zink TR, Blake RJ, Smolinski MP, Miller MC, Greenwell JM, Carrazana-Suarez LF, Smolinski PJ. The Rotator Cable Does Not Stress Shield the Crescent Area During Shoulder Abduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104:1292-1300. [PMID: 35856930 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.21.01142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is accepted by the orthopaedic community that the rotator cable (RCa) acts as a suspension bridge that stress shields the crescent area (CA). The goal of this study was to determine if the RCa does stress shield the CA during shoulder abduction. METHODS The principal strain magnitude and direction in the RCa and CA and shoulder abduction force were measured in 20 cadaveric specimens. Ten specimens underwent a release of the anterior cable insertion followed by a posterior release. In the other 10, a release of the posterior cable insertion was followed by an anterior release. Testing was performed for the native, single-release, and full-release conditions. The thicknesses of the RCa and CA were measured. RESULTS Neither the principal strain magnitude nor the strain direction in either the RCa or the CA changed with single or full RCa release (p ≥ 0.493). There were no changes in abduction force after single or full RCa release (p ≥ 0.180). The RCa and CA thicknesses did not differ from one another at any location (p ≥ 0.195). CONCLUSIONS The RCa does not act as a suspension bridge and does not stress shield the CA. The CA primarily transfers shoulder abduction force to the greater tuberosity. CLINICAL RELEVANCE The CA is important in force transmission during shoulder abduction, and efforts should be made to restore its continuity with a repair or reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher S Spicer
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dimitrios V Papadopoulos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sean M Delserro
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Yoshiaki Tomizuka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thomas R Zink
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan J Blake
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark Carl Miller
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - James M Greenwell
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Luis F Carrazana-Suarez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zink TR, Schmidt CC, Papadopoulos DV, Blake RJ, Smolinski MP, Davidson AJ, Spicer CS, Miller MC, Smolinski PJ. Locating the rotator cable during subacromial arthroscopy: bursal- and articular-sided anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:S57-S65. [PMID: 33878486 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rotator cable (RCa) is an important articular-sided structure of the cuff capsular complex that helps prevent suture pull out during rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) and plays a role in force transmission. Yet, the RCa cannot be located during bursal-sided RCRs. The purpose of this study is to develop a method to locate the RCa in the subacromial space and compare its bursal- and articular-sided dimensions. METHODS In 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens, the RCa was found from the articular side, outlined with stitches, and then evaluated from the bursal side using an easily identifiable reference point, the intersection of a line bisecting the supraspinatus (SS) tendon and posterior SS myotendinous junction (MTJ). Four bursal-sided lengths were measured on the SS-bisecting line as well as the RCa's outside anteroposterior base. For the articular-sided measurements, the rotator cuff capsular complex was detached from bone and optically scanned creating 3D solid models. Using the 3D models, 4 articular-sided lengths were made, including the RCa's inside and outside anteroposterior base. RESULTS The RCa's medial arch was located 9.9 ± 5.6 mm from the reference point in 10 intact specimens and 4.1 ± 2.4 mm in 10 torn specimens (P = .007). The RCa's width was 10.9 ± 2.1 mm, and the distance from the lateral edge of the RCa to the lateral SS insertion was 13.9 ± 4.8 mm. The bursal- and articular-sided outside anteroposterior base measured 48.1 ± 6.4 mm and 49.6 ± 6.5 mm, respectively (P = .268). The average inside anteroposterior base measurement was 37.3 ± 5.9 mm. DISCUSSION The medial arch of the RCa can be reliably located during subacromial arthroscopy using the reference point, analogous to the posterior SS MTJ. The RCa is located 10 mm in intact and 4 mm in torn tendons (P = .007) from the posterior SS MTJ. If the above 6-mm shift in location of the RCa is not taken into consideration during rotator cuff suture placement, it could negatively affect time zero repair strength. The inside anteroposterior base of the RCa measures on average 37 mm; therefore, rotator cuff tears measuring >37 mm are at risk of rupturing part or all of the RCa's 2 humeral attachments, which if not recognized and addressed could impact postoperative function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Zink
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Dimitrios V Papadopoulos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ryan J Blake
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anthony J Davidson
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Christopher S Spicer
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark C Miller
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tomizuka Y, Schmidt CC, Davidson AJ, Spicer CS, Smolinski MP, Mauro RJ, Delserro SM, Szabo LH, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. Partial Distal Biceps Avulsion Results in a Significant Loss of Supination Force. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021; 103:812-819. [PMID: 33497074 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.00445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial avulsions of the short and/or long head of the distal biceps tendon cause pain and loss of strength. The goal of the present study was to quantify the loss of supination and flexion strength following a series of surgical releases designed to simulate partial and complete short and long head traumatic avulsions. METHODS Mechanical testing was performed to measure supination moment arms and flexion force efficiency on 18 adult fresh-frozen specimens in pronation, neutral, and supination. The distal biceps footprint length was divided into 4 equal segments. In 9 specimens (the distal-first group), the tendon was partially cut starting distally by releasing 25%, 50%, and 75% of the insertion site. In the other 9 specimens (the proximal-first group), the releases started proximally. Mechanical testing was performed before and after each release. RESULTS Significant decreases in the supination moment arm occurred after a 75% release in the distal-first release group; the decrease was 24% in pronation (p = 0.003) and 10% in neutral (p = 0.043). No significant differences in the supination moment arm (p ≥ 0.079) or in flexion force efficiency (p ≥ 0.058) occurred in the proximal-first group. CONCLUSIONS A simulated complete short head avulsion significantly decreased the supination moment arm and therefore supination strength. CLINICAL RELEVANCE A mechanical case can be made for repair of partial distal biceps tendon avulsions when the rupture involves ≥75% of the distal insertion site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Tomizuka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher C Schmidt
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anthony J Davidson
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher S Spicer
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan J Mauro
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sean M Delserro
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Linsey H Szabo
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark Carl Miller
- Shoulder and Elbow Mechanical Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmidt CC, Brown BT, Schmidt DL, Smolinski MP, Kotsonis T, Faber KJ, Graham KS, Madonna TJ, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. RETRACTED: Clinical and functional impairment after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:420. [PMID: 31952562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brandon T Brown
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel L Schmidt
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Kotsonis
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Faber
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kraig S Graham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maryview Hospital, Suffolk, VA, USA
| | - Tyler J Madonna
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Carl Miller
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schmidt CC, Madonna TJ, Vaudreuil N, Brown BT, Liu SY, Delserro S, Smolinski MP, Styron J, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. The effect of tendon rotation on distal biceps repair. JSES Open Access 2019; 3:225-231. [PMID: 31709367 PMCID: PMC6835028 DOI: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background The distal biceps tendon externally rotates from proximal to distal before inserting onto the radius. Our hypothesis is that an externally rotated (anatomic) repair would re-create native supination moment arm and flexion force, whereas an internally rotated (nonanatomic) repair would result in reduced force transmission. Methods The mechanical tests performed in this study measured isometric moment arms and elbow flexion force using a validated elbow simulator as previously published. Mechanical testing was performed on 8 native cadaveric elbows (61 ± 15 years). The distal biceps tendons in all specimens were then incised from their footprint and repaired with anatomic and nonanatomic tendon rotations. After each repair, the specimens were retested. The repair sequence was randomly assigned. Results Gross observation showed repair site bunching with the nonanatomic repairs. There was no statistical difference in the moment arms between the native, anatomic, and nonanatomic rotations for the 3 forearm angles (P ≥ .352). Analysis showed no statistical difference in flexion force ratio for the elbow at 90° (P ≥ .283). Discussion The study showed that biceps tendon rotation does not play a role in supination moment arm or flexion force. Twisting the distal biceps tendon around the tendon axis does not change the direction of its applied force on the tuberosity. Tendon bunching in nonanatomic reattachments increases repair site width, which may lead to tendon-ulnar impingement during forearm rotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Tyler J Madonna
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nicholas Vaudreuil
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brandon T Brown
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Y Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sean Delserro
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Styron
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mark C Miller
- Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schmidt CC, Brown BT, Schmidt DL, Smolinski MP, Kotsonis T, Faber KJ, Graham KS, Madonna TJ, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. Clinical and functional impairment after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:757-764. [PMID: 30595503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical and functional impairment after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures is not well understood. The goal of this study was to measure patients' perceived disability, kinematic adjustment, and forearm supination power after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures. METHODS Fourteen individuals after nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures were matched to a control group of 18 uninjured volunteers. Both groups prospectively completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE), and Biceps Disability Questionnaire. Both performed a new timed isotonic supination test that was designed to simulate activities of daily life. The isotonic torque dynamometer measures the supination arc, center of supination arc, torque, angular velocity, and power. Motion analysis quantifies forearm and shoulder contributions to the arc of supination. RESULTS The nonoperative treated group's DASH (23.2 ± 10.3) and SANE (59.6 ± 16.2) scores demonstrated a clinical meaningful impairment. The control group showed no significant differences in kinematic values between dominant and nondominant arms (P = .854). The nonoperative biceps ruptured arms, compared with their uninjured arms, changed supination motion by decreasing the supination arc (P ≤ .036), shifting the center of supination arc to a more pronated position (P ≤ .030), and increasing the shoulder contribution to rotation (P ≤ .001); despite this adaptation, their average corrected power of supination decreased by 47% (P = .001). CONCLUSION Patients should understand that nonoperative treatment for distal biceps ruptures will result in varying degrees of functional loss as measured by the DASH, SANE, and Biceps Disability Questionnaire, change their supination kinematics during repetitive tasks, and that they will lose 47% of their supination power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Schmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Brandon T Brown
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel L Schmidt
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Michael P Smolinski
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thomas Kotsonis
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Faber
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kraig S Graham
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maryview Hospital, Suffolk, VA, USA
| | - Tyler J Madonna
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick J Smolinski
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Carl Miller
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Center, St. Joseph's Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Muriuki MG, Mohagheh-Motlagh A, Smolinski PJ, Miller MC. Elbow helical axes of motion are not the same in physiologic and kinetic joint simulators. J Biomech 2012; 45:2289-92. [PMID: 22784652 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2011] [Revised: 06/15/2012] [Accepted: 06/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Physiologic and kinetic joint simulators have been widely used for investigations of joint mechanics. The two types of simulator differ in the way joint motion is achieved; through prescribed motions and/or forces in kinetic joint simulators and by tendon loads in physiologic joint simulators. These two testing modalities have produced important insights, as in elucidating the importance of soft tissue structures to joint stability. However, the equivalence of the modalities has not been tested. This study sequentially tested five cadaveric elbows using both a physiologic simulator and a robot/6DOF system. Using position data from markers on the humerus and ulna, we calculated and compared the helical axes of motion of the specimens as the elbows were flexed from full extension. Six step size increments were used in the helical axis calculation. Marker position data at each test's full extension and full flexion point were also used to calculate a datum (overall) helical axis. The angles between the datum axis and step-wise movements were computed and stored. Increasing step size monotonically decreased the variability and the average conical angle encompassing the helical axes; a repeated measures ANOVA using test type (robot or physiologic simulator) and step size found that both type and step caused statistically significant differences (p<0.001). The large changes in helical axis angle observed for small changes in elbow flexion angle, especially in the robot tests, are a caveat for investigators using similar control algorithms. Controllers may need to include increased joint compliance and/or C(1) continuity to reduce variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muturi G Muriuki
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Allegheny General Hospital, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Characterization of the constitutive behavior of normal and pathological blood vessel segments could provide the clinician with a means to predict the onset and assess the severity of certain vascular maladies. Many of the constitutive models that have been proposed to date either fail to properly consider certain features of the anatomic structure and function of vascular tissue or are so mathematically complex that their utilization is intractable. We have developed a material identification technique that first required the adaptation and validation of a constitutive law describing the nonlinear, three-dimensional behavior of orthotropic, compressible, hyperelastic vascular segments. By coupling a nonlinear finite element program and experimental data with a robust nonlinear least-squares regression algorithm, a set of elastic parameters (moduli) is obtained. Regressions on data for a canine carotid artery and rabbit infrarenal aorta yielded coefficients of variation of 0.21 and 0.08, respectively. The estimated moduli demonstrated certain trends found by other investigators: both the canine carotid artery and rabbit aorta were found to be stiffer radially than circumferentially, and the former was found to be stiffer circumferentially than longitudinally. Using these material constants and measured arterial pressures, the stress distribution was computed for each specimen. The predicted radial stress was consistent with a transmural variation of approximately--p (applied luminal pressure) to approximately zero in both specimens, while the circumferential stresses ranged from 2.2p to 0.7p for the canine carotid, and from 6.4p to 3.7p for the rabbit aorta. The stress distributions qualitatively agreed with those reported in previous investigations, as well as with certain physiologic observations. Based on the results of our two sample cases, we believe that our technique could be beneficial to the assessment of the three-dimensional, anisotropic behavior of vascular tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Vorp
- University of Pittsburgh, Department of Surgery, PA 15261, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|