Mass Spectrometry-Based Assessment of M-protein in Peripheral Blood During Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma

Mass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma-derived monoclonal proteins in peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during post-transplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of post-transplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in PB in the post-transplant setting, despite unavailability of pre-treatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in PB and paired BM MRD results at the 10-5 threshold, assessed by either next generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which in landmark analysis reached statistical significance after 18 cycles post-transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared to MRD negativity by only one modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10-5 threshold. Overall, post-transplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293.

Health-related quality of life in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with melflufen and dexamethasone: analyses from the phase III OCEAN study

Not available.

Immunotherapy combinations for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: advantages and disadvantages

In the last few years, BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax have been approved for clinical use against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), both as single agents, and in combination. This article summarizes recent achievements in the treatment of patients with CLL, and pays special attention to novel targeted drugs and monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). A literature search was conducted of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Rituximab and obinutuzumab have been combined with chemotherapy, and more recently, with BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and venetoclax. These agents have demonstrated high activity in treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Immunochemotherapy regimens are currently considered in TN younger patients with IGHV-mutated disease and should not be given in patients without IGHV mutation. BTK inhibitors are more commonly used as monotherapy in TN and RR patients. PI3K inhibitors can be combined with CD20 Mabs, but their use in CLL is limited due to safety concerns. Venetoclax is typically combined with anti-CD20 Mabs in CLL. Generally, the optimal sequencing of therapies remains to be established, and the selection of upfront therapy needs to be tailored to the individual patient.

ATLAS: A phase 3 randomized trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone after stem-cell transplant for multiple myeloma

8001

Background: Treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) remains an area of active investigation. We have shown that extended post-ASCT treatment with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) after KRd induction improved the depth and duration of response (Jasielec et al, Blood 2020), suggesting a benefit of post-ASCT KRd therapy. Here we directly compare that strategy to standard lenalidomide (R) maintenance. Methods: This international open-label phase 3 randomized trial recruited newly-diagnosed MM patients (pts) who received any induction therapy for up to 12 months (mo) followed by single ASCT and achievement of at least stable disease within 100 days afterward. Pts were randomized to receive either KRd or R, stratified by post-transplant response (≥VGPR vs < VGPR) and cytogenetic risk [standard risk (SR) vs high [HR: presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)]. Pts randomized to KRd received carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 on days (D) 1,2,8,9,15,16 for 4 cycles (C) then D1,2,15,16 starting C5; R 25 mg D1-21, and dexamethasone 20 mg D1,8,15,22 in 28-day cycles. KRd pts with SR who reached IMWG-defined MRD-negativity after C6 de-escalated therapy to R alone after C8 (KRd- > R); the rest continued KRd through C36 followed by R alone until progression. Pts randomized to R received lenalidomide 10 mg C1-3 and then 15 mg daily. The primary objective was to compare progression free survival (PFS) rate between the two arms. Based on historical PFS rates, a sample size of 180 Pts was calculated to provide 85% power with 2-sided alpha 0.05. Results: 180 pts were enrolled (R n = 87; KRd n = 93) through 10/21/20; data cutoff was 12/31/21. Pt characteristics in the KRd and R arms were balanced for median age (58 vs 59 yrs), >VGPR (88% vs 92%), and HR (23% vs 21%). After 6 cycles, 47% pts in the KRd arm and 29% in the R arm achieved MRD-negativity (p = 0.017). 34 KRd pts eligible for de-escalation converted to R alone after C8 and were analyzed on the KRd arm per intention-to-treat. At median follow-up of 33.8 mo, 23 pts (25%) on the KRd arm and 38 pts (44%) on the R arm progressed; estimated median PFS was 59.0 mo for KRd vs 41.4 mo for R (Hazard Ratio 0.56, logrank p = 0.026). At cutoff, 90% of KRd and 87% of R pts were alive; no deaths were treatment-related. All-grade toxicities were generally comparable between arms. The most common grade 3+ AEs and those of special interest were neutropenia (KRd 47%; R 59%), thrombocytopenia (KRd 13%; R 7%), infections (KRd 15%; R 6%), cardiovascular toxicities (KRd 4%, R 5%), and secondary malignancies (KRd 2, R 2). Conclusions: This is the first randomized phase 3 trial demonstrating superior PFS with extended post-transplant KRd therapy compared to R maintenance. Therefore, MRD/risk-adapted post-ASCT extended KRd treatment may represent a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02659293.

Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone at first relapse in lenalidomide-pretreated myeloma: A subanalysis of OPTIMISMM by clinical characteristics

Objective

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) by age, renal function, and high‐risk cytogenetic abnormalities in lenalidomide‐pretreated patients with multiple myeloma at first relapse.

Methods

OPTIMISMM was a phase 3, multicenter, open‐label, randomized study (NCT01734928; N = 559). The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS).

Results

Overall, 226 patients had received one prior line of therapy. PVd significantly prolonged PFS vs Vd in patients aged ≤65 years (median, 22.0 vs 13.1 months; P = .0258) and >65 years (median, 17.6 vs 9.9 months; P = .0369). Median PFS in patients with renal impairment (RI; creatinine clearance <60 mL/min) was 15.1 months with PVd vs 9.5 months with Vd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.34‐1.34]). In patients without RI, median PFS was 22.0 vs 13.1 months (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27‐0.76]). In patients with high‐risk cytogenetics, median PFS was 14.7 vs 9.9 months (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.13‐1.17]). PVd significantly improved overall response rate vs Vd in all subgroups. The safety profile of PVd was consistent with previous reports.

Conclusions

These findings confirmed the benefits of PVd at first relapse, including in patients with poor prognostic factors.

Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Selinexor combined with dexamethasone has shown activity in patients with heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma. In a phase 1b/2 study, the combination of oral selinexor with bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor) and dexamethasone induced high response rates with low rates of peripheral neuropathy, the main dose-limiting toxicity of bortezomib. We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of weekly selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus standard bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with previously treated multiple myeloma.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomised, open-label trial was done at 123 sites in 21 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, who had multiple myeloma, and who had previously been treated with one to three lines of therapy, including proteasome inhibitors, were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive selinexor (100 mg once per week), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 once per week), and dexamethasone (20 mg twice per week), or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 twice per week for the first 24 weeks and once per week thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg four times per week for the first 24 weeks and twice per week thereafter). Randomisation was done using interactive response technology and stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, lines of treatment, and multiple myeloma stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03110562. The trial is ongoing, with 55 patients remaining on randomised therapy as of Feb 20, 2020.

FINDINGS

Of 457 patients screened for eligibility, 402 were randomly allocated-195 (49%) to the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 207 (51%) to the bortezomib and dexamethasone group-and the first dose of study medication was given between June 6, 2017, and Feb 5, 2019. Median follow-up durations were 13·2 months [IQR 6·2-19·8] for the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 16·5 months [9·4-19·8] for the bortezomib and dexamethasone group. Median progression-free survival was 13·93 months (95% CI 11·73-not evaluable) with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone and 9·46 months (8·11-10·78) with bortezomib and dexamethasone (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·53-0·93], p=0·0075). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (77 [39%] of 195 patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group vs 35 [17%] of 204 in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group), fatigue (26 [13%] vs two [1%]), anaemia (31 [16%] vs 20 [10%]), and pneumonia (22 [11%] vs 22 [11%]). Peripheral neuropathy of grade 2 or above was less frequent with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (41 [21%] patients) than with bortezomib and dexamethasone (70 [34%] patients; odds ratio 0·50 [95% CI 0·32-0·79], p=0·0013). 47 (24%) patients in the selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone group and 62 (30%) in the bortezomib and dexamethasone group died.

INTERPRETATION

A once-per-week regimen of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone is a novel, effective, and convenient treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma who have received one to three previous lines of therapy.

FUNDING

Karyopharm Therapeutics.

Bone lesions in hairy cell leukemia: Diagnosis and treatment

Skeletal involvement is a rare complication of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) with an incidence of approximately 3%. Bone lesions are commonly lytic, and the most common sites of involvement are the femoral head and neck. Skeletal involvement is typically associated with high tumor burden and bone marrow infiltration. However, isolated cases of skeletal disease without splenomegaly or bone marrow involvement are occasionally reported. This review focuses on skeletal lesions in HCL, particularly the pathogenesis, clinical symptoms, diagnostic methods, and treatment approach. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning hairy cell leukemia, skeletal symptoms, bone involvement was conducted via PubMed. Publications from January 1970 to May 2020 were scrutinized. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.

Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) in lenalidomide (LEN)-pretreated relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: Subanalysis of patients with renal impairment in OPTIMISMM

e20562

Background: Upfront LEN until disease progression is a standard treatment (Tx) in multiple myeloma (MM). Data are limited on optimal Tx after first-line LEN, especially in LEN-refractory patients (pts), a growing population. In OPTIMISMM (phase 3, NCT01734928), PVd significantly improved median PFS at first relapse in relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) pts, of whom 100% were LEN pretreated and 57% were LEN refractory (median, 20.7 vs 11.6 mos; HR = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.82]; P = .0027) vs Vd (Richardson, 2019). Pd has shown efficacy and safety in RRMM pts with moderate or severe renal impairment (RI), including those on dialysis (Dimopoulos, 2018). However, outcomes with second-line PVd in RRMM pts with RI have not been assessed. Here we report efficacy and safety of PVd vs Vd at first relapse by renal status (CrCl < 60 vs ≥ 60 mL/min). Methods: Pts received PVd or Vd (1:1) in 21-day (D) cycles (C); POM 4 mg/D on D1-14 (PVd arm only); BORT 1.3 mg/m2 on D1, 4, 8, 11 of C1-8 and on D1, 8 of C9+; and DEX 20 mg/D (10 mg/D for pts aged > 75 yrs) on days of and after BORT. Pts on dialysis were excluded. Results: Of 559 pts enrolled, 226 (40%) had 1 prior line of therapy; of whom 28% had CrCl < 60 mL/min and 4% had severe RI (CrCl < 30 mL/min). In pts with CrCl < 60 mL/min (PVd vs Vd), median age was 74 vs 73 yrs. In pts with CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min (PVd vs Vd), median age was 62 vs 64 yrs. A higher proportion of pts with baseline CrCl < 60 (23% vs 43%) than ≥ 60 mL/min (7% vs 8%) had ISS stage III at study entry. Data cutoff was Oct 26, 2017. Median PFS was improved with PVd in both renal groups (Table). ORR significantly improved regardless of renal status. Depth of response also improved with PVd vs Vd; ≥ VGPR occurred in 54% vs 21% in the CrCl < 60 mL/min group and 64% vs 23% in the CrCl ≥ 60 mL/min group. Myelosuppression was the most common grade 3/4 TEAE (Table). Conclusions: Second-line PVd led to improved vs Vd in pts with RRMM and RI; however, the PFS difference was not statistically significant. Safety was consistent for PVd with no new signals in pts with RI. These findings further support the earlier use of POM-based Tx in RRMM pts, including those with mild to moderate RI. Clinical trial information: NCT01734928. [Table: see text]

OCEAN: a randomized Phase III study of melflufen + dexamethasone to treat relapsed refractory multiple myeloma

Melflufen is a novel peptide-drug conjugate that rapidly delivers a cytotoxic payload into tumor cells. It has emerged as a potential new multiple myeloma treatment, particularly for late-stage forms of the disease. Here we describe the rationale and design of OCEAN (NCT03151811), a randomized, head-to-head, superiority, open-label, global, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of melflufen + dexamethasone versus pomalidomide + dexamethasone. Eligible patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma have received 2-4 previous treatments and are refractory to both lenalidomide and their last treatment. Patients are excluded if they have previously received pomalidomide. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, and key secondary endpoints include overall response rate, duration of response and overall survival.

The current proteomic landscape of the porcine liver

The main objective of the study was to create a reproducible protein map of the liver in healthy growing piglets. The analysis was performed on liver homogenates obtained from 8 castrated male piglets (PIC x Penerlan P76) at the 50 days. Two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry allowed to determine the proteomic profile of the liver. Liver proteins were separated at pH 4 - 7, followed by 12% SDS-PAGE. As a result, 470 ± 44 spots were present on the 2-D maps, of which 265 were successfully identified, representing products of 142 unique genes. Of these, 26 gene products have not been previously observed on the protein maps of porcine liver. Gene ontology analysis showed that the most of identified gene products belonged to the known metabolic pathways: protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, arginine and proline metabolism, microbial metabolism in diverse environments, carbon metabolism, Epstein-Barr virus infection, propionate metabolism, biosynthesis of amino acids, proteasome. These results can undoubtedly serve as a useful and prospective prerequisite for the future analysis of the liver proteome changes in different physiological and pathophysiological conditions.

Novel synthetic drugs currently in clinical development for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Over the last few years, several new synthetic drugs, particularly Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and BCL-2 inhibitors have been developed and investigated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Areas covered: This review highlights key aspects of BTK, PI3K and BCL-2 inhibitors that are currently at various stages of preclinical and clinical development in CLL. A literature review of the MEDLINE database for articles in English concerning CLL, B-cell receptor, BCL-2 antagonists, BTK inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, was conducted via PubMed. Publications from 2000 through July 2017 were scrutinized. The search terms used were acalabrutinib, ACP-196, BGB-3111, ONO-4059, GS-4059, duvelisib, IPI-145, TGR-1202, copanlisib, Bay 80-6946, buparlisib, BKM-120, BCL-2 inhibitors, venetoclax, ABT-263, navitoclax, CDK inhibitors, alvocidib, flavopiridol, dinaciclib, SCH 727,965, palbociclib, PD-0332991, in conjunction with CLL. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the ASH and EHA Annual Scientific Meetings were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. Expert opinion: The use of new synthetic drugs is a promising strategy for the treatment of CLL. Data from ongoing and future clinical trials will aid in better defining the status of new drugs in the treatment of CLL.

Emerging antibody-drug conjugates for treating lymphoid malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) are monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) attached to biologically active drugs through specialized chemical linkers. They deliver and release cytotoxic agents at the tumor site, reducing the likelihood of systemic exposure and therefore toxicity. These agents should improve the potency of chemotherapy by increasing the accumulation of cytotoxic the drug within or near the neoplastic cells with reduced systemic effects. Areas covered: A literature review was conducted of the MEDLINE database PubMed for articles in English examining Mabs, B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors and immunomodulating drugs. Publications from 2000 through April 2017 were scrutinized. Conference proceedings from the previous five years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meetings were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. Expert opinion: Newer ADCs show promise as treatment for several hematologic malignancies, especially lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and leukemia. However, definitive data from ongoing and future clinical trials will aid in better defining the status of these agents in the treatment of these diseases.

Emerging immunological drugs for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Over the last few years, several new immunological drugs, particularly monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), immunomodulatory drugs and B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway inhibitors have been developed and investigated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This article summarizes recent discoveries regarding their mechanism of action, pharmacological properties, clinical activity and toxicity, as well as the emerging role of these agents in CLL.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review of mAbs, BCR pathway inhibitors and immunomodulating drugs was conducted of the MEDLINE database via PubMed for articles in English. Publications from 2000 through February 2015 were scrutinized. The search terms used were alemtuzumab, BI 836826, duvelisib ibrutinib, idelalisib, lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, MEDI-551, MOR208, obinutuzumab, ocaratuzumab, ofatumumab, ONO-4059, otlertuzumab, spebrutinib, veltuzumab and XmAb5574 in conjunction with CLL. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meetings were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of mAbs, BCR inhibitors and immunomodulating drugs is a promising new strategy for chemotherapy-free treatment of CLL. However, definitive data from ongoing and future clinical trials will aid in better defining the status of immunological drugs in the treatment of this disease.

Pro-apoptotic effect of an anti-CD37 scFv-Fc fusion protein, in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody, ofatumumab, on tumour cells from B-cell malignancies

SMIP-016, a new anti-tumour agent, is a mouse/human chimeric fusion protein built on the ADAPTIR™ (modular protein therapeutic) platform targeting human CD37. In this study, for the first time, we examined pro-apoptotic activity of SMIP-016 in combination with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, ofatumumab (HuMax-CD20) in de novo chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cells and in different B-cell neoplasm-derived lines. In CLL cells SMIP-016 exerted significant cytotoxicity (versus control - p=0.01). In the in vitro models, SMIP-016 was also distinctly active against Raji line (Burkitt lymphoma; BL) (versus control - p=0.007), Riva-1 line (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DLBCL) (versus control - p=0.002) and RPMI 8226 line (multiple myeloma cells; MM) (versus control - p=0.03). In studies combining SMIP-016 and ofatumumab, the cytotoxicity against CLL cells was significantly higher than the agents used alone (p<0.03). Remarkably enhanced cytotoxic activity of SMIP-016 and ofatumumab in combination was also observed in Raji and Riva-1 cell lines (p<0.01 and p<0.003, respectively). Importantly, both agents induced cytotoxicity at very low concentrations which suggests that potential side-effects may be decreased in clinical practice. The mechanism responsible for cytotoxicity of SMIP-016 in all the examined models was connected with caspase-dependent apoptosis. In majority of cell types SMIP-016 induced overexpression of Bax protein, as well as downregulation of Bcl-2, cIAP1 (p<0.03) and Smac/DIABLO (p<0.003) apoptosis-regulating proteins. In conclusion, our study demonstrated high pro-apoptotic activity of SMIP-016, especially in combination with ofatumumab, against ex vivo CLL cells, and BL or DLBCL in vitro cell lines. Thus, further preclinical studies in in vivo models are warranted, as this combination may be a promising therapeutic concept for treatment of those malignancies.

BCR signaling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and related inhibitors currently in clinical studies

Normal B lymphocytes receive signals from B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) that are triggered by binding of the BCR to an external antigen. Tonic signaling through the BCR provides growth and signals to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, and plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease. Antigen engagement of BCR is followed by intracellular recruitment and activation of BCR-associated kinases including spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K). Inhibition of signaling pathways downstream of the BCR induces disruption of chemokine-mediated CLL cell migration and cell killing. BCR signal transduction inhibitors represent a promising new strategy for targeted CLL treatment. A number of therapeutic agents have recently been developed with significant activity in CLL. The compounds that are currently investigated in patients with CLL include ibrutinib -inhibitor of Btk, fostamatinib-inhibitor of Syk and idelalisib (GS-1101) -a specific isoform of the PI3K (PI3K) inhibitor. The clinical activity of ibrutinib, GS-1101 and fostamatinib in patients with CLL is associated with marked lymphocytosis due to release of tumor cells from the lymph nodes into the peripheral blood. Further studies are ongoing with single agents and their combinations with other targeted and conventional therapies. This article will review the preclinical rationale of BCR signaling inhibitors in the treatment of CLL, and the clinical evidence supporting the use of these agents in CLL patients.

Older and new purine nucleoside analogs for patients with acute leukemias

Purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) compose a class of cytotoxic drugs that have played an important role in the treatment of hematological neoplasms, especially lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. All PNA drugs have a chemical structure similar to adenosine or guanosine, and they have similar mechanisms of action. They have many intracellular targets: they act as antimetabolites, competing with natural nucleosides during DNA or RNA synthesis, and as inhibitors of key cell enzymes. In contrast to other antineoplastic drugs, PNAs act cytotoxically, both in the mitotic and quiescent cell cycle phases. In the last few years, three PNAs have been approved for the treatment of lymphoid malignancies and other hematological disorders: 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA), fludarabine and pentostatin. 2-CdA and fludarabine are also active in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). These drugs, in combination with cytarabine and other agents, are commonly used as salvage regimens in relapsed or refractory AML. Moreover, the addition of 2-CdA to the standard induction regimen is associated with an increased rate of complete remission and improved survival of adult patients with AML. More recently three novel PNAs have been synthesized and introduced into clinical trials: clofarabine, nelarabine and forodesine. Clofarabine is the most promising PNA in current clinical trials in pediatric and adult patients with acute leukemias. Nelarabine is more cytotoxic in T-lineage than in B-lineage leukemias. Clofarabine and nelarabine have been approved for the treatment of refractory patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma. Clofarabine is also an active drug in AML treatment when administered either alone or in combination regimens as front-line treatment and in relapsed or refractory patients. Unlike other PNA, forodesine is not incorporated into DNA but displays a highly selective purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitory action. Forodesine is undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of T-cell malignancies, including T-cell ALL. This article summarizes recent achievements in the mechanism of action, pharmacological properties and clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs, as well as their emerging role in lymphoid and myeloid acute leukemias.

Current and emerging treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukaemia in Europe and North America. The disease is characterized by proliferation and accumulation of small CD5+ B cells in blood, lymph nodes, spleen, liver and bone marrow. The natural clinical course of CLL is highly variable, and chemotherapy is usually not indicated in early and stable disease. However, patients with progressive and more advanced CLL require treatment. For many years, chlorambucil with or without corticosteroids was used in previously untreated patients with CLL. More recently, purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) [fludarabine, cladribine and pentostatin] have been included in treatment approaches for this disease, and chlorambucil is no longer the leading standard everywhere. Currently, this drug is rather recommended for the treatment of older, unfit patients with co-morbidities, especially in European countries. Significantly higher overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates in patients treated initially with PNAs than in those treated with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide-based combination regimens have been confirmed in randomized, prospective, multicentre trials. Moreover, PNAs administered in combination with cyclophosphamide produce higher response rates, including CR and molecular CR, compared with PNA as monotherapy. Recent reports suggest that the administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can significantly improve the course of CLL. At present, two mAbs have the most important clinical value in patients with CLL. The first is rituximab, a human mouse antibody that targets CD20 antigens, and the second is alemtuzumab, a humanized form of a rat antibody active against CD52. Several recent reports suggest that in patients with CLL, rituximab combined with a PNA can increase the OR and CR rates compared with PNA or rituximab alone, with acceptable toxicity. In randomized trials, the combination of rituximab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC-R regimen) demonstrated higher rates of OR, CR and progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated and relapsed or refractory CLL than fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC regimen). Several reports have confirmed significant activity with alemtuzumab in relapsed or refractory CLL, as well as in previously untreated patients. Recently, several new agents have been investigated and have shown promise in treating patients with CLL. These treatments include new mAbs, agents targeting the antiapoptotic bcl-2 family of proteins and receptors involved in mediating survival signals from the microenvironment, antisense oligonucleotides and other agents. The most promising are new mAbs directed against the CD20 molecule, lumiliximab and anti-CD40 mAbs. Oblimersen, alvocidib (flavopiridol) and lenalidomide are also being evaluated both in preclinical studies and in early clinical trials. In recent years, a significant improvement in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) procedures in patients with high-risk CLL has been observed. However, the exact role of HSCT, autologous or allogeneic, in the standard management of CLL patients is still undefined.

TRU-016, a humanized anti-CD37 IgG fusion protein for the potential treatment of B-cell malignancies

TRU-016, under development by Trubion Pharmaceuticals Inc and Facet Biotech Corp, is an intravenously administered anti-CD37 IgG fusion protein for the potential treatment of B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), as well as for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. TRU-016 was created by humanizing SMIP-016, a mouse/human chimeric protein that demonstrated antitumor activity against lymphoid malignancies in preclinical studies, including in human B-cell tumor mouse xenograft models. In addition, TRU-016 demonstrated synergistic or additive activity in NHL cells in combination with rituximab, rapamycin, doxorubicin and bendamustine. In a phase I/II clinical trial in refractory or relapsed patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, TRU-016 was well tolerated, with clinical benefit and a reduced absolute lymphocyte count observed in all cohorts dosed at > 0.1 mg/kg. TRU-016 is a promising therapeutic agent for patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies, especially patients refractory to standard treatment.

Current status of older and new purine nucleoside analogues in the treatment of lymphoproliferative diseases

For the past few years more and more new cytotoxic agents active in the treatment of hematological malignancies have been synthesized and become available for either in vitro studies or clinical trials. Among them the class of antineoplastic drugs belonging to the purine nucleoside analogues group (PNAs) plays an important role. Three of them: pentostatin (DCF), cladribine (2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA) were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Recently three novel PNAs: clofarabine (CAFdA), nelarabine (ara-G) and forodesine (immucillin H, BCX-1777) have been synthesized and introduced into preclinical studies and clinical trials. These agents seem to be useful mainly for the treatment of human T-cell proliferative disorders and they are currently undergoing clinical trials in lymphoid malignancies. However, there are also several studies suggesting the role of these drugs in B-cell malignancies. This review will summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanism of action, pharmacologic properties, clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs accepted for use in clinical practice, as well as new agents available for clinical trials.

The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the risk of development and treatment of hematologic malignancies

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) comprise the group of structurally diverse but similarly acting compounds that are used for relieving signs and symptoms of inflammation, especially in treatment of rheumatic diseases. Recent reports suggested potential association between regular use of NSAIDs and the risk of development of hematological malignancies. However, the data distinctly differ depending on type of NSAID used, period of its administration and type of malignancy. Regular use of aspirin and other NSAIDs was shown to correlate with reduced risk of lymphoid malignancies. Frequent use of aspirin was found to be associated with decreased risk of acute leukemia (AL) development. In contrast, correlation between long-term acetaminophen usage and increased incidence of AL and multiple myeloma (MM) was indicated. On the other hand, NSAIDs were found to exert anti-cancer effects, inhibiting proliferation and invasive growth or inducing cell apoptosis in several tumors, including hematologic malignancies. One of those agents, non-cyclooxygenase 2-inhibiting R-enantiomer of etodolac (SDX-101), exerts cytotoxic effects against chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and MM cells, and is currently investigated in phase II clinical trial in CLL. The indole-pyran analogue of SDX-101, SDX-308 (CEP-18082), showed more potent cytotoxicity than SDX-101 against MM cells and inhibited osteoclast formation and activity of mature osteoclasts. Thus, SDX-308 may be an ideal agent for bone disease in MM and related diseases. Another analogue of SDX-101, SDX-309, showed also significant anti-tumor activity in first preclinical studies. The potential role of NSAIDs in prevention and treatment of hematologic malignancies is the subject of this review.