Negative Prognostic Impact of Smoking on Long-term Survival in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Curative (Chemo)radiotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of curative (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and to identify prognostic factors influencing treatment outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 73 consecutive patients, treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy from 2002 to 2019 (median stage III/IV 78%). The median total dose of radiotherapy achieved was 70 Gy. Concomitant chemotherapy was given to 82% of patients.

RESULTS

The five- and ten-year locoregional controls were 73% and 72%, respectively; the five- and ten-year distant controls were 93% and 93%, respectively. The five- and ten-year overall survival rates were 46% and 34%, respectively. A multivariate analysis identified age, smoking, and the initial response to treatment as the strongest prognostic factors in predicting survival.

CONCLUSION

Smoking ≤5 years before starting curative (chemo)radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was shown to be an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival with a four-fold higher risk of death compared to non-smokers.

Long-term results of radio(chemo)therapy in metastatic carcinoma to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary. Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score as a predictor of survival

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity of curative (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoma to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 90 consecutive patients, treated with curative radiotherapy from 2003 to 2018 (median age 59 years; current/former smokers 76%) was conducted. The distribution of nodal staging was as follows: N1: 12%, N2a: 21%, N2b: 43%, N2c: 10%, N3: 13%. In 62% of patients, neck dissection was performed before radiotherapy. Concomitant chemotherapy was given to 64% of patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of surviving patients was 86 months. The median total radiotherapy dose achieved was 70 Gy. The 5‑ and 10-year locoregional control were 84% in both cases, while 5‑ and 10-year distant control were 90% and 89%, respectively. A primary tumor in the head and neck area was detected in only 2 patients. No patient had an initial failure in the pharyngeal axis or contralateral cervical nodes. The 5‑ and 10-year overall survival were 55% and 42%, respectively. Severe early toxicity occurred in 71%; severe late toxicity in 33% of patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated N‑status (hazard ratio [HR] 2.424; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121-5.241; p = 0.024) and comorbidity scores assessed by ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation; HR 3.058; 95% CI 1.489-6.281; p = 0.002) as two independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The results of our work study demonstrate the high effectiveness of curative (chemo)radiotherapy on the pharyngeal axis and bilateral cervical nodes with long-term locoregional and distant control in 3/4 of the treated patients. N‑status and comorbidity scores were shown as strong prognostic factors influencing overall survival.

Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-564): 30-month follow-up analysis of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-564 study showed improved disease-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo after surgery in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma at an increased risk of recurrence. The analysis reported here, with an additional 6 months of follow-up, was designed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab versus placebo, as well as additional secondary and exploratory endpoints.

METHODS

In the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial, adults aged 18 years or older with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence were enrolled at 213 hospitals and cancer centres in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Eligible participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had undergone nephrectomy 12 weeks or less before randomisation, and had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via central permuted block randomisation (block size of four) to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles. Randomisation was stratified by metastatic disease status (M0 vs M1), and the M0 group was further stratified by ECOG performance status and geographical region. All participants and investigators involved in study treatment administration were masked to the treatment group assignment. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population (all participants randomly assigned to a treatment). Safety was assessed in the safety population, comprising all participants who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or placebo. As the primary endpoint was met at the first interim analysis, updated data are reported without p values. This study is ongoing, but no longer recruiting, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03142334.

FINDINGS

Between June 30, 2017, and Sept 20, 2019, 994 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=496) or placebo (n=498). Median follow-up, defined as the time from randomisation to data cutoff (June 14, 2021), was 30·1 months (IQR 25·7-36·7). Disease-free survival was better with pembrolizumab compared with placebo (HR 0·63 [95% CI 0·50-0·80]). Median disease-free survival was not reached in either group. The most common all-cause grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (in 14 [3%] of 496 participants) and increased alanine aminotransferase (in 11 [2%]) in the pembrolizumab group, and hypertension (in 13 [3%] of 498 participants) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events attributed to study treatment occurred in 59 (12%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and one (<1%) participant in the placebo group. No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab.

INTERPRETATION

Updated results from KEYNOTE-564 support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab monotherapy as a standard of care for participants with renal cell carcinoma with an increased risk of recurrence after nephrectomy.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Molecular and IHC analysis of head and neck carcinomas associated with HPV infection

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are a highly heterogenous disease which can be induced by two main carcinogens - tobacco and/or alcohol, or by HR HPV infection. This work examined 60 paraffin-embedded biopsies of head and neck carcinomas after histological verification. HPV infection, including its specific types in various HNSCC areas, was studied using multiplex qPCR. Expression levels of p16INK4A and p53 were detected by subsequent IHC analysis as being potential diagnostic markers. Based on the assumption that patients with HNSCC could benefit from anti-EGFR therapy (cetuximab), but the predictors are not yet defined, analyses of point mutations of ras genes (Kras, Nras) were carried out using multiplex qPCR and sequence analysis of the Braf gene. All statistical data were processed by Chí-x2 test.HPV infection was detected in 23.34 % of cases with HNSCC, of which 100 % were HPV 16, which is the most frequently infection found in the oropharyngeal region. Using IHC analysis, a positive expression of P16INK4A was detected in 100 % of HPV-positive HNSCC while this expression was discovered to be highly correlated with HPV infection. Furthermore, a correlation between p53 and HPV-negative HNSCC was proved. The mutation incidence was the highest in the Kras gene (codon 12 and codon 146), Nras (codon 12) and Braf. A correlation between tumor location in the oropharyngeal region and Kras mutations was proved. The HPV infection correlated with Kras mutations in case of codon 146 but on the grounds of low amount of output data, these figures could be irrelevant. In one case, c.1808 G>A, protein 603 Arg>Gln mutation was found in the Braf gene but its correlation with head and neck carcinomas has not been described yet (Tab. 2, Fig. 2, Ref. 24). Keywords: head and neck carcinomas, biopsy, HPV types, PCR, p16INK4A, p53, molecular predictors, Kras, Nras, Braf.

Afatinib vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is treated curatively; however, risk of recurrence remains high among some patients. The ERBB family blocker afatinib has shown efficacy in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC.

Objective

To assess whether afatinib therapy after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with HNSCC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, phase 3, double-blind randomized clinical trial (LUX-Head & Neck 2) studied 617 patients from November 2, 2011, to July 4, 2016. Patients who had complete response after CRT, comprising radiotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin, with or without resection of residual disease, for locoregionally advanced high- or intermediate-risk HNSCC of the oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, or oropharynx were included in the study. Data analysis was of the intention-to-treat population.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (2:1) to treatment with afatinib (40 mg/d) or placebo, stratified by nodal status (N0-2a or N2b-3) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 or 1). Treatment continued for 18 months or until disease recurrence, unacceptable adverse events, or patient withdrawal.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was DFS, defined as time from the date of randomization to the date of tumor recurrence or secondary primary tumor or death from any cause. Secondary end points were DFS at 2 years, overall survival (defined as time from the date of randomization to death), and health-related quality of life.

Results

A total of 617 patients were studied (mean [SD] age, 58 [8.4] years; 528 male [85.6%]). Recruitment was stopped after a preplanned interim futility analysis on July 4, 2016, on recommendation from an independent data monitoring committee. Treatment was discontinued. Median DFS was 43.4 months (95% CI, 37.4 months to not estimable) in the afatinib group and not estimable (95% CI, 40.1 months to not estimable) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.81-1.57; stratified log-rank test P = .48). The most common grade 3 and 4 drug-related adverse effects were acneiform rash (61 [14.8%] of 411 patients in the afatinib group vs 1 [0.5%] of 206 patients in the placebo group), stomatitis (55 [13.4%] in the afatinib group vs 1 [0.5%] in the placebo group), and diarrhea (32 [7.8%] in the afatinib group vs 1 [0.5%] in the placebo group).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study's findings indicate that treatment with afatinib after CRT did not improve DFS and was associated with more adverse events than placebo in patients with primary, unresected, clinically high- to intermediate-risk HNSCC. The use of adjuvant afatinib after CRT is not recommended.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01345669.

Postoperative Adjuvant Lapatinib and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Maintenance Lapatinib Monotherapy in High-Risk Patients With Resected Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE

This multicenter phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lapatinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB2 inhibitor, administered concomitantly with chemoradiotherapy and as maintenance monotherapy in patients with high-risk surgically treated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resected stage II to IVA SCCHN, with a surgical margin ≤ 5 mm and/or extracapsular extension, were randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy (66 Gy total radiation dose and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) per day administered on days 1, 22, and 43) plus placebo or lapatinib (1,500 mg per day) before and during chemoradiotherapy, followed by 12 months of maintenance monotherapy.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled (lapatinib, n = 346; placebo, n = 342). With a median follow-up time of 35.3 months, the study ended early because of the apparent plateauing of disease-free survival (DFS) events. Median DFS assessed by an independent review committee was 53.6 months and not reached for lapatinib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.43). Investigator-assessed results confirmed the independent review committee assessment. No significant differences in DFS by human papillomavirus status or overall survival were observed between treatment arms. Similar numbers of patients in both treatment arms experienced adverse events (AEs), with more patients in the lapatinib arm than the placebo arm experiencing serious AEs (48% v 40%, respectively). The most commonly observed treatment-related AEs were diarrhea and rash, both predominantly in the lapatinib arm.

CONCLUSION

Addition of lapatinib to chemoradiotherapy and its use as long-term maintenance therapy does not offer any efficacy benefits and had additional toxicity compared with placebo in patients with surgically treated high-risk SCCHN.

Definitive radiochemotherapy with weekly cisplatin in patients with head and neck cancer; single institution outcome analysis

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of definitive radiochemotherapy with weekly cisplatin in head and neck cancer in a single institutional setting.

METHODS

Previously untreated patients with stage II-IV head and neck cancer were included. Radiotherapy consisted of 70 Gy/7 weeks/35 fractions. All patients received concurrent cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) weekly.

RESULTS

Between 2/2002 and 8/2009, 148 consecutive patients (WHO ≤ 2, male to female ratio 6/1, median age 56 years) were treated. The mean follow-up was 40 months. Tumors of the oropharynx were the most frequent (46%) and stage IV predominated (80%). Eighty-nine percent of the patients had received the full radiation treatment as planned. Omission of weekly cisplatin occurred frequently, mainly because of hematological toxicity. Only 64% of the patients completed at least 5 cycles of chemotherapy. Grade 3/4 mucosal toxicity developed in 32% of the patients. The late toxicities were acceptable: 74% of the patients were able to eat solid food during the 1st post-treatment year, 4 patients were not able to swallow at all during the 1st post-treatment year, requiring thus permanent feeding tube. Five cases of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible were reported. Three-year overall survival, locoregional control, time to progression and disease free survival were 34, 60, 52 and 29%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Definitive radiochemotherapy with weekly cisplatin was toxic, with high rate of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Five weekly cycles of 40 mg/m(2) cisplatin seem to be the dose limit for most patients. Three-year survival was significantly reduced despite the promising high initial response and locoregional control.