Added value of whole-exome and RNA sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel

INTRODUCTION

The objective was to determine the added value of comprehensive molecular profile by whole-exome and RNA sequencing (WES/RNA-Seq) in advanced and refractory cancer patients who had no molecular-based treatment recommendation (MBTR) based on a more limited targeted gene panel (TGP) plus array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we selected 50 patients previously included in the PROFILER trial (NCT01774409) for which no MBT could be recommended based on a targeted 90-gene panel and aCGH. For each patient, the frozen tumor sample mirroring the FFPE sample used for TGP/aCGH analysis were processed for WES and RNA-Seq. Data from TGP/aCGH were reanalyzed, and together with WES/RNA-Seq, findings were simultaneously discussed at a new molecular tumor board (MTB).

RESULTS

After exclusion of variants of unknown significance, a total of 167 somatic molecular alterations were identified in 50 patients (median: 3 [1-10]). Out of these 167 relevant molecular alterations, 51 (31%) were common to both TGP/aCGH and WES/RNA-Seq, 19 (11%) were identified by the TGP/aCGH only and 97 (58%) were identified by WES/RNA-Seq only, including two fusion transcripts in two patients. A MBTR was provided in 4/50 (8%) patients using the information from TGP/aCGH versus 9/50 (18%) patients using WES/RNA-Seq findings. Three patients had similar recommendations based on TGP/aCGH and WES/RNA-Seq.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced and refractory cancer patients in whom no MBTR was recommended from TGP/aCGH, WES/RNA-Seq allowed to identify more alterations which may in turn, in a limited fraction of patients, lead to new MBTR.

Healthcare worker protection against mpox contamination: position paper of the French Society for Hospital Hygiene

In the context of the recent re-emergence of mpox worldwide, the French Society for Hospital Hygiene (SF2H) performed a literature review of the transmission paths and proposed specific recommendations for healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for patients with suspected or confirmed MPXV. In developed countries, the risk of contamination among HCWs in healthcare facilities seemed to be very low, limited to contamination through needle stick injuries. Two additional contamination cases were reported and not fully explained. Beyond healthcare settings, the analysis of the literature highlighted (i) a main contamination route during sexual intercourse, mainly among men who have sex with men, and (ii) a very low secondary attack rate in other contexts, such as schools or jails. Numerous studies have reported molecular or virus identification on surfaces or in the air surrounding patients, without any association with the low secondary case incidence; moreover, the minimum infectious dose through air or mucosal exposure is still unknown. Owing to the lack of evidence of MPXV respiratory transmission in the healthcare setting, the SF2H recommends the implementation of standard and contact precautions combined with medical/surgical mask use. Owing to the lack of evidence of transcutaneous contamination, the SF2H recommends the use of gloves only if contact with cutaneous lesions or mucous membranes occurs. Regarding the risk of contamination from the environment in healthcare facilities, additional studies must be conducted to investigate this.

Heritable defects in telomere and mitotic function selectively predispose to sarcomas

Cancer genetics has to date focused on epithelial malignancies, identifying multiple histotype-specific pathways underlying cancer susceptibility. Sarcomas are rare malignancies predominantly derived from embryonic mesoderm. To identify pathways specific to mesenchymal cancers, we performed whole-genome germline sequencing on 1644 sporadic cases and 3205 matched healthy elderly controls. Using an extreme phenotype design, a combined rare-variant burden and ontologic analysis identified two sarcoma-specific pathways involved in mitotic and telomere functions. Variants in centrosome genes are linked to malignant peripheral nerve sheath and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, whereas heritable defects in the shelterin complex link susceptibility to sarcoma, melanoma, and thyroid cancers. These studies indicate a specific role for heritable defects in mitotic and telomere biology in risk of sarcomas.

Abstract A018: Mitazalimab (CD40 agonist) in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Safety data and recommended dose for phase 2 (RP2D) from OPTIMIZE-1, a phase 1b/2 study

Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic IgG1antibody being developed as cancer immunotherapy. Targeting CD40 kickstarts the cancer immunity cycle by licensing DCs leading to tumor-specific T cell priming and activation. Furthermore, in PDAC, CD40 agonism activates myeloid cells and promotes the degradation of the desmoplastic tumor stroma, improving the influx of T cells and chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor. Mitazalimab has shown to be safe and well tolerated (at doses up to 1200 μg/kg) with signs of clinical activity in solid tumors in a Phase I study (NCT02829099). Most drug related adverse events (AE) were grade 1 or 2. OPTIMIZE-1 (NCT04888312) is a phase 1b/2, open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in adults diagnosed with previously untreated mPDAC. The objective of the first (phase 1b) part of the study was to determine the RP2D of mitazalimab + mFOLFIRINOX. Mitazalimab was escalated from 450 µg/kg to 900 µg/kg following a Bayesian optimal interval design with at least 3 patients enrolled per dose level. In the first 21-day treatment cycle (Dose Limiting Toxicity assessment period), mitazalimab is administered intravenously on day 1 and 10 and mFOLFIRINOX starts on day 8. In the second and subsequent cycles, treatment follows a 14-day cycle schedule where mitazalimab is administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. In part 2 of the study (phase 2), mitazalimab at the RP2D will be administered in combination with mFOLFIRINOX. Primary endpoint is RECIST-defined overall response rate. Progression-free survival and overall survival will be assessed as secondary endpoints. We report data from phase 1b (dose escalation) part of this study. As of March 9, 2022, 11 patients were treated with mitazalimab: 5 at 450 µg/kg and 6 at 900 µg/kg mitazalimab doses. One patient in the 900 µg/kg dose cohort withdrew from the trial for administrative reasons after the first mitazalimab infusion, prior to receiving mFOLFIRINOX and was not included in RP2D determination. Key baseline characteristics included: 7 female, 4 male; median age 63 (range 57-70); ECOG 0-1; median time since mPDAC diagnosis, 25 days. Mitazalimab related AEs were reported in 9/11 patients. Treatment related AEs occurring in >1 patient were fever (60%), muscle pain (50%) and fatigue (20%). At the 450 µg/kg dose, all mitazalimab related AEs were grade 1-2. At the 900 µg/kg dose, 4 patients (67%) experienced grade 1-2 mitazalimab related AEs. One patient in the 900 µg/kg dose experienced mitazalimab related grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 headache that led to treatment discontinuation after the first cycle. There were no mitazalimab related grade 4 or 5 AEs. 1/10 patients required mFOLFIRINOX dose reduction and, at the cutoff date, the range of treatment length was 1-14 weeks. Mitazalimab combined with mFOLFIRINOX is safe and well tolerated. The 900 µg/kg dose of mitazalimab was selected as the RP2D. Phase 2 of the OPTIMIZE-1 trial is currently enrolling patients.

Citation Format: Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Ivan Borbath, Hans Prenen, Aurélien Lambert, Karen Geboes, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Yago Pico de Coaña, Karin Enell-Smith, Lena Schultz, Karin Nordbladh, Peter Ellmark, Sumeet Ambarkhane, Malin Carlsson, Philippe Cassier. Mitazalimab (CD40 agonist) in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Safety data and recommended dose for phase 2 (RP2D) from OPTIMIZE-1, a phase 1b/2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A018.

Expanding the molecular spectrum of tenosynovial giant cell tumors

Background

While great advances in clinical and pathological description of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) have been made, TGCT molecular heterogeneity represents an ongoing challenge. The canonical oncogenic fusion CSF1::COL6A3 is not systematically observed, suggesting that other oncogenic mechanisms are involved in tumorigenesis. This study aims to explore by RNA sequencing a retrospective series of tumors diagnosed as TGCT, in order to provide a better description of their molecular landscape and to correlate molecular features with clinical data.

Methods

We analyzed clinicopathological data and performed whole-exome RNA sequencing on 41 TGCT samples.

Results

RNAseq analysis showed significant higher CSF1 and CSF1-R expression than a control panel of 2642 solid tumors. RNA sequencing revealed fusion transcripts in 14 patients including 6 not involving CSF1 and some previously unreported fusions. Unsupervised clustering on the expression profiles issued from this series suggested two distinct subgroups: one composed of various molecular subtypes including CSF1 and FN1 rearranged samples and one composed of four tumors harboring an HMGA2::NCOR2 fusion, suggesting distinct tumor entities. Overall, 15 patients received at least one systemic anti-CSF1R treatment and clinical improvement was observed in 11 patients, including patients from both clusters.

Discussion

This study reported molecular heterogeneity in TGCT, contrasting with the clinical and pathological homogeneity and the ubiquitous high CSF1 and CSF1R expression levels. Whether molecular diversity may impact the efficacy of systemic treatments needs to be further investigated.

SMAD2/3 mediate oncogenic effects of TGF-β in the absence of SMAD4

TGF-β signaling is involved in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumorigenesis, representing one of the four major pathways genetically altered in 100% of PDAC cases. TGF-β exerts complex and pleiotropic effects in cancers, notably via the activation of SMAD pathways, predominantly SMAD2/3/4. Though SMAD2 and 3 are rarely mutated in cancers, SMAD4 is lost in about 50% of PDAC, and the role of SMAD2/3 in a SMAD4-null context remains understudied. We herein provide evidence of a SMAD2/3 oncogenic effect in response to TGF-β1 in SMAD4-null human PDAC cancer cells. We report that inactivation of SMAD2/3 in SMAD4-negative PDAC cells compromises TGF-β-driven collective migration mediated by FAK and Rho/Rac signaling. Moreover, RNA-sequencing analyses highlight a TGF-β gene signature related to aggressiveness mediated by SMAD2/3 in the absence of SMAD4. Using a PDAC patient cohort, we reveal that SMAD4-negative tumors with high levels of phospho-SMAD2 are more aggressive and have a poorer prognosis. Thus, loss of SMAD4 tumor suppressive activity in PDAC leads to an oncogenic gain-of-function of SMAD2/3, and to the onset of associated deleterious effects.

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and patient tissue, SMAD2/3 is shown to mediate oncogenic effects of TGF-β in the absence of SMAD4.

Abstract CT206: EVT801, a novel selective VEGFR-3 inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, started enrollment for its phase I first-in-human study

Introduction: EVT801 is a highly selective, orally available VEGFR3 inhibitor that strongly inhibits angiogenesis without inducing hypoxia, considered one of the main causes of cancer-associated immunosuppression. EVT801 has shown compelling single agent efficacy in multiple in vivo models. In addition, combination of EVT801 and Immune Checkpoint Therapy (ICT) agents shows additive effects, and thus holds promise for combination treatment without induction of hypoxia-induced-immunosuppression. A phase I clinical trial is underway.

Methods: The phase I trial will consist of two sequential stages. During the first stage, EVT801 will be administered to patients with advanced solid tumors in a multiple ascending dose study using an accelerated 3+3 design (1 patient per dose until grade 2 toxicities are observed) in up to 48 patients in 8 dose levels. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Stage 2 will focus on validation of this RP2D in two 6-patient cohorts diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma or renal cell carcinoma. These patients will participate in intensive analyses involving several biomarkers to better understand the pharmacological activity of the drug. A potential third stage, consisting of a multiple ascending dose evaluation of the combination of EVT801 with immuno-oncology drugs, may be added to the ongoing trial, pending further technical discussions with physicians and regulators. In addition to conventional measures of safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics, the phase I study will employ a rich suite of histological, immunological, and radiological biomarkers to provide early insights into the activity of EVT801.

Citation Format: Carlos Gomez roca, Philippe Cassier, Marie Mandron, Myriam Estrabaut, Nathalie Delesque-Touchard, Adam C. Smith, Amy Klawitter, Leesa Gentry, Pierre Fons, Michael R. Paillasse, Lise Davenne, Michael Fitzgerald, James Garner, Jean-Pierre Delord. EVT801, a novel selective VEGFR-3 inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, started enrollment for its phase I first-in-human study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT206.

Abstract 3203: Cutting edge biomarkers strategy to provide early insights into activity of EVT-801, a novel selective VEGFR-3 inhibitor that targets tumor angiogenesis during the FIH clinical trial

Introduction: EVT801 is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR3 and acts by inhibiting lymphangiogenesis and tumor angiogenesis in and around the tumor. It has shown compelling activity in a wide range of cancer models and is well-tolerated in preclinical toxicology studies. A phase I study is underway and will focus primarily on understanding the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of EVT801 across a range of doses.

Methods: The first stage of the study is designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) for EVT801, with a second stage aiming to confirm RP2D in selected cancer patient populations. Clinical samples from these patients will be used to explore preliminary signals of clinical efficacy and investigate the biological activity of the drug using several biomarkers. Efficacy biomarkers will include imaging approaches (DCE-MRI and CEUS) to characterize tumor vascularization, as well as analysis of protein and mRNA quantification in on-treatment biopsies vs pre-treatment biopsies. Moreover, the relationship between activity of EVT801 and expression of key markers at protein and mRNA level will be investigated to potentially establish biomarkers for patient stratification and selection. Lastly, target engagement and pharmacodynamics effects will be investigated by immuno-monitoring as well as assessment of a defined set of proteins as markers of inflammation and angiogenesis as identified in preclinical in vivo models. We expect that these analyses will help to better understand the effects of the drug in human subjects and may also help to select the most responsive patients and provide early signs of clinical efficacy.

Citation Format: Michael R. Paillasse, James Garner, Michael Fitzgerald, Lise Davenne, Pierre-Benoit Ancey, celine Poussereau-Pomie, Michael Esquerre, Gaelle Badet, Joel Tuyaret, Marie Mandron, Philippe Rochaix, Maha Ayyoub, Clara Maria Scarlata, Christine Ménétrier-Caux, Chrsitophe CAUX, Philippe Cassier, Jean-Pierre Delord, Carlos Gomez Roca, Pierre Fons. Cutting edge biomarkers strategy to provide early insights into activity of EVT-801, a novel selective VEGFR-3 inhibitor that targets tumor angiogenesis during the FIH clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3203.

Anti-CSF-1R emactuzumab in combination with anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab in advanced solid tumor patients naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockade

BACKGROUND

This phase 1b study (NCT02323191) evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) emactuzumab in combination with the programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1)-blocking mAb atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs).

METHODS

Emactuzumab (500-1350 mg flat) and atezolizumab (1200 mg flat) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of emactuzumab was conducted using the 3+3 design up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose (OBD). Extension cohorts to evaluate pharmacodynamics and clinical activity were conducted in metastatic ICB-naive urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) and ICB-pretreated melanoma (MEL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and UBC patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 221 patients were treated. No MTD was reached and the OBD was determined at 1000 mg of emactuzumab in combination with 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 (11.3%) patients of which fatigue and rash were the most common (14 patients (6.3%) each). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 9.8% for ICB-naïve UBC, 12.5% for ICB-experienced NSCLC, 8.3% for ICB-experienced UBC and 5.6% for ICB-experienced MEL patients, respectively. Tumor biopsy analyses demonstrated increased activated CD8 +tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) associated with clinical benefit in ICB-naïve UBC patients and less tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) reduction in ICB-experienced compared with ICB-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

Emactuzumab in combination with atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile with increased fatigue and skin rash over usual atezolizumab monotherapy. A considerable ORR was particularly seen in ICB-experienced NSCLC patients. Increase ofCD8 +TILs under therapy appeared to be associated with persistence of a TAM subpopulation.

Reasons for acceptance and refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials in a regional comprehensive cancer centre in France: protocol for a qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

A few studies have highlighted the potential synergy between early palliative care and inclusion in an early-phase clinical trial that may improve quality of life, reduce symptoms of exhaustion related to the side effects of treatment and allow patients to complete their treatment protocol. The primary objective of this qualitative study is to evaluate the reasons for acceptance or refusal of early palliative care in patients included in early-phase clinical trials.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

All patients from the Centre Léon Bérard (Comprehensive Cancer Centre in Lyon, France) who consent to one of the early-phase clinical trials proposed at the centre will be invited to participate in this study. The cohort will consist of a subgroup (n=20) of patients who accept palliative care together with their clinical trial, and a second subgroup (n=20) of patients who decline it. Patients will be interviewed in exploratory interviews conducted by a psychology researcher before the start of their clinical trial. The interviews will be audio-recorded. Patients will also be asked to complete quality of life and anxiety/depression questionnaires both before the beginning of the treatment and at the end of their clinical trial. The content of the interviews will be analysed thematically. Descriptive and comparative statistical analysis of both cohorts will also be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Personal data will be collected and processed in accordance with the laws and regulations in force. All patients will give informed consent to participate. This study complies with reference methodology MR004 of the Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés. The protocol has received the validation of an ethics committee (Groupe de Réflexion Ethique du CLB, number: 2020-006). The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04717440.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Patients with KRAS-mutant cancers have limited treatment options. Here we present a phase I study of JNJ-74699157, an oral, selective, covalent inhibitor of the KRAS G12C isoform, in patients with advanced cancer harboring the KRAS G12C mutation.

Methods

Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received or were ineligible for standard treatment received JNJ-74699157 once daily on a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was guided by a modified continual reassessment method.

Results

Ten patients (100 mg: 9 and 200 mg: 1) were enrolled. Tumor types included non–small cell lung cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 4), and carcinoma of unknown primary site (n = 1). The median age was 65 (range: 36-74) years and median treatment duration was 2.91 (range: 0.5-7.5) months. Dose-limiting toxicities of grades 3–4 increased blood creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) were observed in 100 mg and 200 mg dose levels. The most common adverse event was increased blood CPK (6 patients). No significant clinical benefit was observed; the best response was stable disease in 4 patients (40%).

Conclusion

Based on dose-limiting skeletal muscle toxicities and the lack of efficacy at the 100 mg dose, further enrollment was stopped. The safety profile of JNJ-74699157 was not considered favorable for further clinical development.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier

NCT04006301

537 OPTIMIZE-1, an open-label phase 1b/2 study assessing the safety and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background

Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic antibody (IgG1) developed for cancer immunotherapy. Targeting CD40 provides an opportunity to kickstart the cancer-immunity cycle by priming and activating tumor-specific T cells.1 2 Furthermore, the effects of CD40 agonists on myeloid cells promote degradation of the tumor stroma, improving the influx of T cells and chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor.1 Targeting CD40 with mitazalimab in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is defined by a desmoplastic tumor stroma that hosts immune-suppressive macrophages, has the potential to augment responses to chemotherapy, initiating an effective anti-tumor immune response. Data from a phase 1 study (NCT02829099) demonstrated early signs of clinical activity in solid tumors with one partial response and SD in 37% of the patients.3 Mitazalimab was safe and tolerable at intravenous doses up to 1200 μg/kg and most drug-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2.3 Biomarker data from this study demonstrated proof of mechanism, validating mitazalimab’s ability to activate CD40 in cancer patients. In preclinical hCD40tg mouse models, repeated administration of mitazalimab in combination with FOLFIRINOX induced a long-term survival when compared to chemotherapy alone.4

Methods

OPTIMIZE-1 is a phase 1b/2, open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) in adults diagnosed with previously untreated metastatic PDAC. Mitazalimab and mFOLFIRINOX will be administered by intravenous infusions following a 14-day cycle schedule where mitazalimab will be administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX, except for the first cycle of 21 days where mitazalimab will be administered on Day 1 and 10 and infusion of mFOLFIRINOX will start Day 8. In Part 1 (Phase 1b) of the study, the dose of mitazalimab will be escalated from 450 µg/kg to 900 µg/kg (2 dose levels to be evaluated) to obtain the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Part 1 follows a Bayesian optimal interval design (BOIN) with at least 3 patients enrolled at each dose level. A minimum of 6 patients will be evaluated at the RP2D. In Part 2 of the study, the RP2D of mitazalimab will be administered in combination with mFOLFIRINOX to all patients. The study expansion will evaluate the clinical efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX assessing objective response rate (ORR) (primary endpoint), Progression-free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) (secondary endpoints). The study expansion includes a Simon’s two-stage design with an interim analysis to allow stopping for futility or efficacy based on ORR.

Trial Registration

NCT04888312

References

Enell Smith K, Deronic A, Hägerbrand K, Norlén P & Ellmark P. Rationale and clinical development of CD40 agonistic antibodies for cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 2021 Jun 17, 1–12.

Ellmark P, Mangsbo SM, Furebring C, Totterman TH & Norlen P. Kick-starting the cancer-immunity cycle by targeting CD40. Oncoimmunology 2015;4:e1011484.

Calvo E, et al. A phase I study to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of JNJ-64457107, a CD40 agonistic monoclonal antibody, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019;37:2527–2527.

Adnan Deronic MT, Anneli Nilsson, Peter Ellmark, Anette Fält, Karin Enell Smith. Mitazalimab, a potent CD40 agonist with potential for combination with chemotherapy. AACR Annual meeting Abstract 2021;1593.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved 19 July 2021 by CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne Comité d’éthique Avenue Docteur G. Thérasse 1 5530 YVOIR, Belgium, approval number 32/2021and2 July 2021 by Comite de Protection des Personnes EST I, ‘France, approval number SI2G 21.00648.677157

Radioresistance and genomic alterations in head and neck squamous cell cancer: Sub-analysis of the ProfiLER protocol

BACKGROUND

Genome analysis could provide tools to assess predictive molecular biomarkers of radioresistance.

METHODS

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients included in ProfiLER study and who underwent a curative radiotherapy were screened. Univariate and Cox multivariate analyses were performed to explore the relationships between molecular abnormalities, infield relapse and complete tumor response after radiation.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-three patients were analyzed. PIK3CA mutation and genomic instability of MAP kinases pathway were found to be prognostic factors of loco-regional relapse in multivariate analysis with respectively HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.83, p = 0.005 and HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.96, p = 0.025. Instability of apoptosis pathway was found to be a prognostic factor of complete response after radiotherapy with HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.88, p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

This sub analysis suggests that PIK3CA mutation, variation of copy number of MAP kinases and apoptosis pathways play a significant role in the radioresistance phenomenon.

Abstract LB179: Oncolytic virus TG6002 locates to tumors after intravenous infusion and induces tumor-specific expression of a functional pro-drug activating enzyme in patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas

Objective: TG6002 is a vaccinia virus deleted for Thymidine Kinase/Ribonucleotide Reductase and encoding the FCU1 enzyme that converts 5-Fluorocytosine (5-FC) to 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). In a dose-escalation phase I study combining intravenous TG6002 and oral 5-FC in patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas, exploratory analyses were performed to document TG6002 pharmacokinetic (PK) and biodistribution, and FCU1 function.

Methodology: A total of 10 patients, median age 60 years (range 50-69), received TG6002 infusions on days 1, 8 and 15 at the dose of 3x108 pfu (n=3) (low dose, LD) or 1x109 pfu (high dose, HD) (n=7) combined with 5-FC (4 times 50 mg/kg/day) on days 5 to 7, 12 to 14, and 19 to 28 for colorectal (n=6), esophagus (n=1), gastric (n=1), pancreatic (n=1) and ampulla of Vater (n=1) carcinomas. Blood was sampled 30 min, 3h and 24h after TG6002 infusion on day 1 and 15 for plasma TG6002 PK and one hour after intake of 5-FC at screening (single dose of 50 mg/kg) and on days 5, 7, 14 and 28 for serum 5-FC and 5-FU measurements. A metastasis biopsy was performed on day 5 along with synchronous blood sampling. Virus presence was assessed by qPCR and plaque assay, and 5-FC and 5-FU quantified using HPLC-MS. Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) titers were assessed using a plaque inhibition assay at baseline, days 28 and 43.

Results: TG6002 was detected by qPCR in plasma and was rapidly cleared with no patients showing trace of the virus beyond 3 hours after administration. On day 5, despite very scarce availability of biomaterial, the virus was detected in tumoral tissue in 1/3 and 2/7 patients of the LD and HD cohorts, respectively. 5-FC to 5-FU conversion was detected in tumor of all patients and the highest tumor concentrations of 5-FU (65 and 227 pg/mg of tissue, respectively) were found in 2 of the 3 patients in which virus was detected in the tumor. The other patients had tumor 5-FU concentrations ranging from 0.8 to 8.7 pg/mg. Those patients with highest tumor 5-FU levels had the highest level of serum 5-FU on day 5 (352 and 417 ng/mL, respectively). All other patients had levels of 5-FU ranging from 2 to 42 ng/mL, reflecting FCU1 activity. No 5-FU was detected after the intake of 5-FC during the screening period, excluding endogenous 5-FC to 5-FU conversion. Overall, blood 5-FU concentrations were 89±144, 50±96, 7±9 and 1±0.6 ng/ml on days 5, 7, 14 and 28, respectively, with no apparent differences between LD and HD cohorts. NAbs were developed by all patients on day 28 and could explain the decrease in blood 5-FU over the study course.

In conclusion, despite the sensitivity challenges associated with direct detection of viral particles in patient tumor tissue, our data suggest that TG6002 locates to tumors after intravenous administration, remains active and effectively express an active recombinant payload selectively in tumor tissue. The study is continuing with escalating doses of virus.

Citation Format: Kaidre Bendjama, Philippe Cassier, Victor Moreno, Bernard Doger, Emiliano Calvo, Maria de Miguel, Christiane Jungels, Philippe Erbs, Damien Carpentier, Alain Sadoun. Oncolytic virus TG6002 locates to tumors after intravenous infusion and induces tumor-specific expression of a functional pro-drug activating enzyme in patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB179.

LEAP-005: A phase 2 multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the gastric cancer cohort

4030

Background: Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in the first- or second-line in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced gastric cancer. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is a phase 2, multicohort, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here, we present findings from the gastric cancer cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer, received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and provided a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the gastric cancer cohort; 87% were male, 58% were aged < 65 years, and 71% had PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 7.0 months (range, 1.9‒11.9); 19 patients (61%) had discontinued treatment. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26); 1 patient had CR (3%), and 2 had a PR (6%). 12 patients (39%) had SD. Median DOR was not reached (range, 2.1+ to 2.3+ months). DCR was 48% (95% CI, 30‒67). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8‒4.2). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.6‒8.7). 28 patients (90%) had treatment-related AEs, including 13 patients (42%) with grade 3‒5 AEs. 1 patient had a treatment-related AE that led to death (hemorrhage). 8 patients (26%) had immune-mediated AEs: hypothyroidism (n = 5), hyperthyroidism (n = 2), and pneumonitis (n = 1). There were no infusion-related reactions. Conclusions: In patients with advanced gastric cancer who received 2 prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Based on these data, enrollment in the gastric cancer cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of a first cancer is associated with a decreased incidence of second primary cancer

Background

Second primary cancers (SPCs) are diagnosed in over 5% of patients after a first primary cancer (FPC). We explore here the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) given for an FPC on the risk of SPC in different age groups, cancer types and treatments.

Patients and methods

The files of the 46 829 patients diagnosed with an FPC in the Centre Léon Bérard from 2013 to 2018 were analyzed. Structured data were extracted and electronic patient records were screened using a natural language processing tool, with validation using manual screening of 2818 files of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the incidence of SPC according to patient characteristics and treatment were conducted.

Results

Among the 46 829 patients, 1830 (3.9%) had a diagnosis of SPC with a median interval of 11.1 months (range 0-78 months); 18 128 (38.7%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) and 1163 (2.5%) received ICIs for the treatment of the FPC in this period. SPCs were observed in 7/1163 (0.6%) patients who had received ICIs for their FPC versus 437/16 997 (2.6%) patients receiving CC and no ICIs for the FPC versus 1386/28 669 (4.8%) for patients receiving neither CC nor ICIs for the FPC. This reduction was observed at all ages and for all histotypes analyzed. Treatment with ICIs and/or CC for the FPC are associated with a reduced risk of SPC in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy with ICIs alone and in combination with CC was found to be associated with a reduced incidence of SPC for all ages and cancer types.

•

From 2013 to 2018, 3.9% of the 46 829 patients diagnosed with a first cancer presented with an SPC.

•

Treatment of the first cancer with ICIs was associated with a major reduction of SPC.

•

CC given for an FPC was also associated with a lower magnitude of reduction of SPC.

•

There were no SPC in cancer patients treated with ICIs in the localized phase of their first cancer.

LEAP-005: A phase II multicohort study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated selected solid tumors—Results from the gastric cancer cohort

230

Background: Lenvatinib, an anti-angiogenic multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with the anti‒PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in the first- or second-line in a phase 2 trial of patients with advanced gastric cancer. LEAP-005 (NCT03797326) is a phase 2, multicohort, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors; here, we present findings from the gastric cancer cohort of LEAP-005. Methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or unresectable gastric cancer, received at least 2 prior lines of therapy, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ECOG PS of 0‒1, and provided a tissue sample evaluable for PD-L1 expression. Patients received lenvatinib 20 mg once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 35 cycles of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years) or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Treatment with lenvatinib could continue beyond 2 years in patients experiencing clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were ORR (per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review) and safety. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; comprising CR, PR, and SD), duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Tumor imaging was performed Q9W from treatment initiation for 54 weeks, then Q12W to week 102, and Q24W thereafter. Results: 31 patients were enrolled in the gastric cancer cohort; 87% were male, 58% were aged < 65 years, and 71% had PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median time from first dose to data cutoff (April 10, 2020) was 7.0 months (range, 1.9‒11.9); 19 patients (61%) had discontinued treatment. ORR was 10% (95% CI, 2‒26); 1 patient had CR (3%), and 2 had a PR (6%). 12 patients (39%) had SD. Median DOR was not reached (range, 2.1+ to 2.3+ months). DCR was 48% (95% CI, 30‒67). Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.8‒4.2). Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 2.6‒8.7). 28 patients (90%) had treatment-related AEs, including 13 patients (42%) with grade 3‒5 AEs. 1 patient had a treatment-related AE that led to death (hemorrhage). 8 patients (26%) had immune-mediated AEs: hypothyroidism (n = 5), hyperthyroidism (n = 2), and pneumonitis (n = 1). There were no infusion-related reactions. Conclusions: In patients with advanced gastric cancer who received 2 prior lines of therapy, lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile. Based on these data, enrollment in the gastric cancer cohort has been expanded to 100 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03797326.

Clinical activity of the RET inhibitor pralsetinib (BLU-667) in patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors

467

Background: Recent tumor-agnostic drug approvals have resulted in a paradigm shift in cancer treatment away from organ/histology specific indications to biomarker-guided tumor-agnostic approaches. Pralsetinib is a potent and selective RET inhibitor, which has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adults with metastatic RET fusion–positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is under New Drug Application review for RET mutant thyroid cancers by the FDA. RET fusions occur in up to approximately 7‒8% of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies, including pancreatic, liver, and colorectal cancers. There are currently no approved selective RET inhibitors for patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid cancer. Here, we present data on the clinical activity of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumor types other than NSCLC enrolled in the Phase I/II ARROW study (NCT03037385). Methods: ARROW consists of a phase I dose escalation (30–600 mg once [QD] or twice daily) followed by a phase II expansion (400 mg QD) in patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors. Primary objectives are overall response rate (ORR), per RECICT v1.1 and safety. Results: A total of 13 patients with RET fusion–positive thyroid cancer (12 papillary, 1 poorly differentiated; enrollment cutoff July 11, 2019) and 14 patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid (3 pancreatic, 3 colon, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, 6 other; enrollment cutoff November 19, 2019) were enrolled in ARROW and received pralsetinib. At the February 13, 2020, data cutoff, the ORR (blinded central review) in response-evaluable patients with RET fusion–positive thyroid cancer was 91% (10/11; 95% CI: 59‒100) and disease control rate was 100% (95% CI: 72‒100). Treatment was ongoing in 7 of 11 patients. In RET fusion–positive solid tumors other than NSCLC and thyroid, ORR (investigator’s assessment) was 50% (6/12; 95% CI: 21‒79) and responses were observed in all patients with pancreatic cancer (3/3) and cholangiocarcinoma (2/2). Treatment was ongoing in 6 of 12 patients, including 2 of 3 patients with pancreatic cancer and 1 of 2 patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Responses were observed across multiple fusion genotypes. In the 27 patients with RET fusion–positive tumors other than NSCLC, most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1–2, and included anemia (33%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (33%), decreased white blood cell count (33%), hypertension (30%), increased alanine aminotransferase (26%), hyperphosphatemia (19%), and neutropenia (19%). No patients discontinued due to TRAEs. Conclusions: Pralsetinib demonstrated broad and durable antitumor activity across multiple advanced solid tumor types, regardless of RET fusion genotype, and was well tolerated. The study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385.

Therapeutic relevance of molecular screening program in patients with metastatic sarcoma: Analysis from the ProfiLER 01 trial

BACKGROUND

Advanced sarcoma is a group of heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis and poor efficacy of medical treatment. They represent a promising group of tumors to assess molecular-based therapy (MBT) strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Genomic profiles of patients with advanced sarcoma included in the ProfiLER program were established by NGS using a 69 genes panel and CGH array. A weekly molecular board reviewed genomic reports to select relevant genomic alterations and propose recommendations for MBT.

RESULTS

A genomic profile was available for 158 of 164 patients. At least 1 relevant genomic alteration was reported for 106 patients (67%), with frequent multiple alterations (68%). In total, 289 relevant genomic alterations were identified in 143 different genes; 139 homozygous deletions, 86 gene amplifications and 64 somatic mutations. The most frequently impacted genes were TP53, Rb1, CDKN2A, CDK4, MDM2, and PTEN. MBT was recommended for 47 patients and initiated for 13 patients. One objective response was observed for an angiosarcoma treated with pazopanib for FLT4 amplification; 4 patients had a stable disease, including a long-lasting 33 months stabilization.

CONCLUSION

Genomic profiling for advanced sarcoma is feasible, even for bone sarcoma. A small proportion of patients are eventually treated with MBT, similar to other tumor types. We could not demonstrate this strategy to be beneficial to patients. Our data suggest that molecular profiling should not be used in routine practice but warrants further exploration in clinical trials, focusing on sarcoma with complex genomic, and adding transcriptomic analysis to the copy number and mutational analyses.

Tumor Molecular Profiling: Pediatric Results of the ProfiLER Study

PURPOSE

The Program to Establish the Genetic and Immunologic Profile of Patient's Tumor for All Types of Advanced Cancer study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01774409) analyzed the genome of refractory cancers to identify a potential molecular-based recommended therapy (MBRT). The objectives of the pediatric substudy were to describe the incidence of genomic mutations, the MBRT, and the treatments undertaken with a molecular-targeted agent in a pediatric cohort.

METHODS

The tumor genome was analyzed within a 69-gene next-generation sequencing panel and an array comparative genomic hybridization assay. The results were evaluated by a multidisciplinary molecular board, and the targeted therapies were provided in the setting of a clinical trial or through compassionate use programs, when indicated.

RESULTS

Between November 2013 and June 2017, 50 patients younger than 19 years who were treated for a high-risk or relapsing tumor were included. Sarcomas (n = 24; 47%), CNS tumors (n = 14; 29%), and neuroblastomas (n = 5; 10%) were the most frequent tumor subtypes. Seven patients (14%) were excluded because no DNA could be recovered. Among the 43 remaining patients, 10 exhibited at least one targetable genomic alteration. Ultimately, four patients (8%) were treated with the recommended targeted therapy.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study confirm treatment with a targeted therapy for pediatric patients with cancer is still limited at present, as also is reported for adults.

Phase Ib study of anti-CSF-1R antibody emactuzumab in combination with CD40 agonist selicrelumab in advanced solid tumor patients

Background

This phase Ib study evaluated the safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of emactuzumab (anti-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb)) in combination with selicrelumab (agonistic cluster of differentiation 40 mAb) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

Both emactuzumab and selicrelumab were administered intravenously every 3 weeks and doses were concomitantly escalated (emactuzumab: 500 to 1000 mg flat; selicrelumab: 2 to 16 mg flat). Dose escalation was conducted using the product of independent beta probabilities dose-escalation design. PD analyzes were performed on peripheral blood samples and tumor/skin biopsies at baseline and on treatment. Clinical activity was evaluated using investigator-based and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1-based tumor assessments.

Results

Three dose-limiting toxicities (all infusion-related reactions (IRRs)) were observed at 8, 12 and 16 mg of selicrelumab together with 1000 mg of emactuzumab. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached at the predefined top doses of emactuzumab (1000 mg) and selicrelumab (16 mg). The most common adverse events were IRRs (75.7%), fatigue (54.1%), facial edema (37.8%), and increase in aspartate aminotransferase and creatinine phosphokinase (35.1% both). PD analyzes demonstrated an increase of Ki67⁺-activated CD8⁺ T cells accompanied by a decrease of B cells and the reduction of CD14^Dim CD16^bright monocytes in peripheral blood. The best objective clinical response was stable disease in 40.5% of patients.

Conclusion

Emactuzumab in combination with selicrelumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and evidence of PD activity but did not translate into objective clinical responses.

Trialregistration number

NCT02760797.

Abstract CT302: Phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab as a single agent and in combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: The immunomodulatory receptor TIGIT (T-cell Immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains) is a novel inhibitory immune checkpoint present on activated T cells and NK cells in multiple cancers. In preclinical models, co-inhibition of the TIGIT and PD-L1/PD-1 pathways improved anti-tumor activity compared to either agent alone. Tiragolumab (tira or MTIG7192A) is a humanized IgG1/kappa monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds TIGIT to prevent its interaction with its ligand PVR (CD155). In this first-in-human dose-escalation study, we report the preliminary safety and anti-tumor activity of tira as a single agent and in combination with atezolizumab (atezo) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Enrolled patients, ECOG PS 0-1, had advanced tumors for whom standard therapy did not exist or was ineffective. Patients received escalating doses of tira alone IV Q3W alone (Phase Ia) or in combination with atezo 1200 mg IV Q3W (Phase Ib) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision. Study objectives included evaluation of safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and anti-tumor activity of tira alone or tira + atezo. Data cut-off date was April 2019. Results: 73 patients with multiple tumor types were treated in dose-escalation (24 in Phase Ia, 49 in Ib with tira + atezo). In Phase Ia and Phase Ib, median age was 60 and 54 years, ECOG 0 for 29% and 27% of patients, and those who received ≥ 3 prior therapies were 67% and 57%, respectively. No DLTs were observed. Across doses, treatment-related AEs occurred in 67% in Phase Ia and 59% in Phase Ib (Grade ≥ 3: 4% and 4%, respectively), and most common AEs were fatigue (38%) in Phase Ia and anemia (31%) in Phase Ib. Exposure of tira increased with increasing dose, and saturation of nonlinear PK occurred at tira doses ≥ 100 mg Q3W. Complete and sustained occupancy of peripheral TIGIT receptors was observed at tira doses ≥ 30 mg Q3W. In Phase Ia, there were no objective responses, but SD of &gt; 4 months duration was observed (n=4). In Phase Ib, there were 3 responses, which all occurred in PD-L1 positive tumors (2 non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]: 1 CR, 1 PR; and 1 head/neck squamous cell carcinoma: PR) with two patients not receiving prior immunotherapy (CIT-naïve). Therefore, expansion cohorts were initiated in PD-L1-positive CIT-naïve indications in Phase Ib. In the metastatic NSCLC expansion cohort (n=14) ORR was 50%, with 1 CR and 6 PRs; DCR was 79%, and the safety profile was similar. Conclusions: Tira monotherapy or combined with atezo was well-tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile across all dose levels. Preliminary anti-tumor activity was observed in Phase Ib with tira + atezo in CIT-naïve PD-L1-positive tumors, including NSCLC, and enrollment is ongoing in these expansion cohorts.

Citation Format: Johanna C. Bendell, Philippe Bedard, Yung-Jue Bang, Patricia LoRusso, Stephen Hodi, Michael Gordon, Sandra D'Angelo, Sandra D'Angelo, Jayesh Desai, Elena Garralda, Antoine Italiano, Myung-Ju Ahn, Andres Cervantes, Zev Wainberg, Emiliano Calvo, Marta Gil-Martin, Maria Martinez-Garcia, Rastilav Bahleda, Philippe Cassier, Jean-Pierre Delord, Amy Prawira, Ignacio Melero, Leisha Emens, Emanuela Romano, Karen Miller, Robert W. Hsieh, Cloris Xue, Kari Morrissey, Patrick Twomey, Kelly Gash, Namrata S. Patil, Jane Grogan, Raymond Meng, Byoung Cho, Tae Won Kim. Phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation study of the anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab as a single agent and in combination with atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT302.

High mortality rate in cancer patients with symptoms of COVID-19 with or without detectable SARS-COV-2 on RT-PCR

Background

Cancer patients presenting with COVID-19 have a high risk of death. In this work, predictive factors for survival in cancer patients with suspected SARS-COV-2 infection were investigated.

Methods

PRE-COVID-19 is a retrospective study of all 302 cancer patients presenting to this institute with a suspicion of COVID-19 from March 1st to April 25th 2020. Data were collected using a web-based tool within electronic patient record approved by the Institutional Review Board. Patient characteristics symptoms and survival were collected and compared in SARS-COV-2 real-time or reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)–positive and RT-PCR–negative patients.

Results

Fifty-five of the 302 (18.2%) patients with suspected COVID-19 had detectable SARS-COV-2 with RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal samples. RT-PCR–positive patients were older, had more frequently haematological malignancies, respiratory symptoms and suspected COVID-19 pneumonia of computed tomography (CT) scan. However, respectively, 38% and 20% of SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR–negative patients presented similar respiratory symptoms and CT scan images. Thirty of the 302 (9.9%) patients died during the observation period, including 24 (80%) with advanced disease. At the median follow-up of 25 days after the first symptoms, the death rate in RT-PCR–positive and RT-PCR–negative patients were 21% and 10%, respectively. In both groups, independent risk factors for death were male gender, Karnofsky performance status <60, cancer in relapse and respiratory symptoms. Detection of SARS-COV-2 on RT-PCR was not associated with an increased death rate (p = 0.10). None of the treatment given in the previous month (including cytotoxics, PD1 Ab, anti-CD20, VEGFR2…) correlated with survival. The survival of RT-PCR–positive and –negative patients with respiratory symptoms and/or COVID-19 type pneumonia on CT scan was similar with a 18.4% and 19.7% death rate at day 25. Most (22/30, 73%) cancer patients dying during this period were RT-PCR negative.

Conclusion

The 30-day death rate of cancer patients with or without documented SARS-COV-2 infection is poor, but the majority of deaths occur in RT-PCR–negative patients.

Long term term follow-up of tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatments in inoperable or relapsing diffuse type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (dTGCT)

RATIONALE

CSF1R tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and antibodies yield response rates and tumor control in patients with diffuse type tenosynovial giant cell tumors (dTGCT). The long term management of patients with dTGCT treated with TKI is however not known.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single center study on the 39 patients with advanced and/or inoperable dTGCT referred to the Centre Leon Berard for a medical treatment. The clinical characteristics and treatments of patients who had received at least one line of CSF1R TKI or Ab was collected from the electronic patient records and analyzed, after this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Centre Leon Berard. Statistics were conducted using SPSS 23.0.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients received at least one line of TKI among the 101 patients with histologically confirmed dTGCT refered to this center. Imatinib, nilotinib, pexidartinib, emactuzumab were the most frequently used agents. First line treatment was given for a median duration of 7 months. With a median follow-up from the initiation of TKI of 30 months, the progression-free rate at 30 months is 56% for the 39 patients. 15 patients had recurrent disease after first line CSF1R inhibitor: 12 (80%) received a 2nd line treatment for a median duration of 6 months and a median time to progression (TTP) of 12 months. Six patients had afterwards a recurrent disease and 5 (83%) received a 3rd line treatment for a median duration of 5 months and a median TTP of 9 months. Progression-free rate at 30 months was observed in 3 of 12 (25%) after line 2 and 1 of 5 (20%) after line 3. None of the patients refered died with a median follow-up of 67 months.

CONCLUSIONS

CSF1R TKI or Ab provide prolonged tumor control and symptom relief for a majority of patients with inoperable or relapsing dTGCT, in first and subsequent lines. Multiple lines are required for close to 50% of patients with relapsing dTGCT.

Generation of an Fsp1 (fibroblast-specific protein 1)-Flpo transgenic mouse strain

Recombination systems represent a major breakthrough in the field of genetic model engineering. The Flp recombinases (Flp, Flpe, and Flpo) bind and cleave DNA Frt sites. We created a transgenic mouse strain ([Fsp1‐Flpo]) expressing the Flpo recombinase in fibroblasts. This strain was obtained by random insertion inside mouse zygotes after pronuclear injection. Flpo expression was placed under the control of the promoter of Fsp1 (fibroblast‐specific protein 1) gene, whose expression starts after gastrulation at Day 8.5 in cells of mesenchymal origin. We verified the correct expression and function of the Flpo enzyme by several ex vivo and in vivo approaches. The [Fsp1‐Flpo] strain represents a genuine tool to further target the recombination of transgenes with Frt sites specifically in cells of mesenchymal origin or with a fibroblastic phenotype.

Phase I experience with rogaratinib in patients (pts) with urothelial carcinoma (UC) selected based on FGFR mRNA overexpression

527

Background: Aberrant activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway is implicated in many cancers, including UC. In a recent Phase I dose-escalation study, rogaratinib, an oral pan-FGFR1-4 inhibitor, demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in pts with solid cancers selected based on FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression. We report results from the Phase I expansion cohort with rogaratinib in pts with UC selected by FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression and/or FGFR3-activating mutations (NCT01976741). Methods: Pts with advanced/metastatic UC were screened for FGFR1-3 mRNA overexpression using RNA in situ hybridization (RNAscope) and NanoString assay in fresh or archival tumor samples. Pts received rogaratinib 800 mg po BID continuously. Tumor response and safety were assessed. Results: 74 pts with UC were treated with rogaratinib; 73.0% were male, median age was 66 years (range 45-85), and 93.2% had stage IV disease. Rogaratinib was well tolerated, with adverse events being mostly mild or moderate. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are shown in the Table. The most common drug-related TEAEs (any grade) were diarrhea (52.7%), increased blood phosphorus (41.9%), and decreased appetite and dry mouth (31.1% each). No ocular toxicities were reported. Increased blood creatinine and acute kidney injury (AKI), regardless of relatedness, were reported in 16.2% and 2.7% of pts, respectively; 1 case of AKI was confirmed as acute tubular necrosis. Of 72 evaluable pts, 15 (20.8%) achieved an objective response; complete and partial responses were observed in 1 (1.4%) and 14 (19.4%) pts, respectively. Stable disease was achieved by 34 pts (47.2%), with a disease control rate of 68.1%. Conclusions: Rogaratinib demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile in pts with tumor FGFR1-3 mRNA-positive UC. TEAEs observed in >25% of pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01976741. [Table: see text]

Clinical activity of avapritinib in ≥ fourth-line (4L+) and PDGFRA Exon 18 gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)

826

Background: Targeting oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations revolutionized treatment of patients (pts) with advanced GIST; however, nearly all pts succumb to resistant disease. Avapritinib is a potent and selective kinase inhibitor with broad activity against oncogenic KIT/PDGFRA mutants, including PDGFRA D842V and other primary or secondary resistance mutations. Results from the phase 1 NAVIGATOR (NCT02508532) study of avapritinib in pts with advanced GIST are presented. Methods: Adult pts with unresectable PDGFRA D842V or other mutant GIST who progressed on imatinib and ≥1 other tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) were treated with oral, daily, continuous avapritinib. Adverse events (AE) and response by mRECIST 1.1 per central radiology were assessed. Overall population safety (30-600 mg starting doses) and efficacy in the response-evaluable 4L+ and PDGFRA Exon 18 (Ex 18) populations treated at the MTD (400 mg)/RP2D (300 mg) were analyzed. Results: As of 16 Nov 2018, 237 pts [172 KIT, 62 PDGFRA Ex 18 [56 D842V, 6 non-D842V), 2 PDGFRA N659K, 1 missing] were enrolled including 111 in the 4L+ population (primarily KIT, median 4 prior TKI) and 43 in the Ex 18 population (median 1 prior TKI). The 4L+ ORR was 22% [1 CR, 23 PR (1 pending)], and 52 SD with mDOR of 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.2–NE). The Ex 18 ORR was 86% [3 CR, 34 PR (1 pending)] and 5 SD; mDOR was not reached (95% CI: 11.3–NE). Most AEs were grade 1–2, most commonly nausea (63%), fatigue (58%), anemia (49%), periorbital edema (42%), diarrhea (40%), vomiting (40%), decreased appetite (38%), increased lacrimation (33%), peripheral edema (33%) and memory impairment (most common cognitive AE, 29%). 10% of pts discontinued due to a related AE. Grade 3–4 related AE ≥ 2% were anemia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, hyperbilirubinemia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. Conclusions: Avapritinib has important clinical activity in pts with advanced GIST who have no effective therapies. The ORR and DOR of avapritinib in 4L+ exceeds that of approved 2nd and 3rd line therapies and shows impressive activity in D842V and other Ex 18 mutant PDGFRA GIST. Results suggest avapritinib has the potential to change the treatment paradigm of pts with advanced GIST. Clinical trial information: NCT02508532.

Abstract A076: Phase I dose escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AsiDNA, a first-in-class DNA Repair Inhibitor, administered intravenously (IV) in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: AsiDNA is a first-in-class oligonucleotide that mimics double-stranded DNA breaks and acts as a decoy to disrupt the DNA damage response at the “real” sites of DNA damage. It also activates the DNA-PK and PARP enzymes that induce the phosphorylation of H2AX and HSP90 and proteins parylation, respectively. As a result, repair enzymes are no longer recruited to the damage sites, ultimately leading to tumor cell death. Importantly, healthy cells, which display proficient cell cycle control, halt their cell division until AsiDNA is depleted. Patients and Methods: The primary objective was to establish dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IV AsiDNA. Other objectives included the safety profile, PK/PD and preliminary efficacy data. Six dose levels (DLs) were planned: 200, 400, 600, 900, 1300 and 1800 mg. All patients (pts) received a loading dose of AsiDNA for 3 consecutive days (D), followed by a 1 hour IV infusion once a week in 21 days cycles (C). In each subsequent cycle, AsiDNA was given weekly. AsiDNA was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient’s decision. Results: Twenty-two pts were treated in the first 5 DLs (153 infusions). Two DLTs were reported (hepatic enzyme increased Gr 3 and Gr 4 at DL 1300 and DL 900, respectively). One related SAE at D42 (Gr 3 orthostatic hypotension) and one related AE at D28 (Gr 3 hypophosphatemia) both at DL 900. AsiDNA PK increased proportionally and consistently with dose from DL1 to DL5. Baseline and on-treatment biopsies were available for 10 pts. There was a robust activation of DNA-PK evidenced by a significant post-treatment increase of γH2AX and pHSP90 from DL 400 with a maximum at DL 600. The quantification of Ki67 showed a clear decrease of the tumor proliferation rate in 7 out of 10 pts evaluated. Best overall response was disease stabilization in 2 pts (9%) with colorectal cancer at DL 600. Conclusions: AsiDNA IV-MTD was not reached. Biological activity was evidenced by the increase of γH2AX and pHSP90. The favorable safety profile was confirmed. DL 600 has been identified as the optimal biological dose for further development given the favorable safety and PK profiles, robust target engagement, and disease stabilization in 2 pts.

Citation Format: Christophe Le Tourneau, Jean-Pierre Delord, Philippe Cassier, Nuria Kotecki, Edith Borcoman, Ségolène Hescot, Christiane Jungels, Audrey Mole, Hélène Toussaint, Olga Adamiec, Olivier de Beaumont. Phase I dose escalation study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of AsiDNA, a first-in-class DNA Repair Inhibitor, administered intravenously (IV) in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A076. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A076