The threat of funding cuts for graduate medical education: survey of decision makers

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential actions of medical school deans, graduate medical education (GME) committee chairs, and hospital chief executive officers (CEOs) regarding future funding reductions for residency training. Specifically, institutions with emergency medicine (EM) residencies were surveyed to see whether EM training was disproportionally at risk for reductions.

METHODS

An anonymous 2-page survey was used. Ninety-eight EM residency programs were identified using the American Medical Association Graduate Medical Education Directory 1994-95. Seventy deans, 102 GME chairs, and 97 hospital CEOs were identified. The survey posed a hypothetical 25% forced reduction in residency positions and asked the decision makers for their responses. Options included: 1) proportional reductions of training positions from all residencies, 2) proportional reductions in either primary care or specialty residency positions, or 3) reduction or elimination of specific training programs. The survey asked for a first and second choice of residencies to be reduced or eliminated from an alphabetical list of 17. The survey elicited explanations for each program reduction.

RESULTS

200 (74%) of 269 surveys were returned. Eighty-four responders selected specific residencies to be reduced or eliminated. EM was selected 8 times, making EM the seventh most vulnerable residency to be targeted for reductions. The decision makers who selected proportional reductions chose to reduce across all residencies 32 times, among only the specialty residencies 129 times, and among only the primary care residencies 3 times.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of anticipated residency cuts, favored proportional reductions in specialty residencies would likely affect EM training. However, most GME decision makers with an existing EM residency program do not consider the EM residency a top choice to be reduced or eliminated.

Difficulties with portable suction equipment used for prehospital advanced airway procedures

INTRODUCTION

Airway management is the highest priority for prehospital personnel. While different modalities for airway management are under investigation, endotracheal intubation remains the standard for definitive airway protection. Currently, airway adjuncts such as portable suction remain relatively unstudied.

OBJECTIVE

To identify utilization and complications associated with portable suction equipment used by prehospital medical personnel.

METHODS

Fifty-one paramedics serving a Level I urban trauma center were anonymously surveyed to determine types of equipment used, maintenance and utilization patterns, difficulties encountered, and training received with that equipment.

RESULTS

The paramedics reported carrying suction equipment to the scene of medical aid calls less than 25% of the time. Once on scene, suction equipment is utilized during 50% of advanced airway procedures. Half of the paramedics reported complications affecting patient care at least once during their careers due to equipment malfunction. Ninety-eight percent of the paramedics reported having some type of training with the suction equipment for prehospital advanced airway procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that suction equipment is carried to the scene infrequently and, when employed, is often found to be functioning suboptimally. Suggestions for improvement and further investigation are provided.

Seizures and the long-QT syndrome

We describe a case of idiopathic long-QT syndrome in a 4-year-old Hispanic girl. She had been seen previously at an outside hospital for possible new-onset seizure disorder but was brought to our emergency department after sustaining an unwitnessed fall. Her ECG was significant for changes consistent with long-QT syndrome. Emergency physicians should understand the necessity of electrocardiography in all pediatric patients who present with multiple spontaneous falls, episodes of dizziness, new-onset seizure activity and syncopal episodes.

Hemoconcentration during cardiac arrest and CPR

The objective of this study was to determine if hemoconcentration occurs during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The design was an animal model of cardiac arrest and CPR performed at a research institute using six mongrel dogs. After the induction of cardiac arrest, animals were subjected to 4 minutes of ventricular fibrillation followed by 20 minutes of CPR. Resuscitation was then achieved using countershocks, drugs, and intravenous fluids. Hemoglobin concentrations were obtained before arrest and every 5 minutes during CPR. An average peak increase in hemoglobin concentration of 21% was observed during CPR. Hemoconcentration occurs during cardiac arrest and CPR, and this may be a result of a shift in volume from the intravascular to the extravascular space.