1
|
Hou J, Wang Y, Shi L, Chen Y, Xu C, Saeedi A, Pan K, Bohat R, Egan NA, McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Williams LJ, Yang Z, Sun M, Liang X, Ahnert JR, Varadarajan N, Yee C, Chen Y, Hwu P, Peng W. Abstract 1575: The landscape of tumor intrinsic immune regulators revealed by genome-wide CRISPR immune screen integrated with comprehensive clinical data analysis. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-1575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Despite approval of immunotherapy for a wide range of cancers, the majority of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy or relapse following initial response which may be attributed to immunosuppression co-opted by tumor cells. However, it is challenging to utilize conventional methods to systematically evaluate the potential of tumor intrinsic factors to act as immune regulators in cancer patients. In this study, we designed an unbiased integrative strategy to leverage the complementary strength of in vitro functional genomic screens and multi-omics clinical data to assess the role of individual tumor-intrinsic factors in regulating T cell tumor infiltration and T cell-mediated tumor killing, the two most important rate-limiting steps of cancer immunotherapy. Initially, a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screening system using paired murine tumors and tumor-reactive T cells was employed to globally screen tumor intrinsic factors modulating the tumor sensitivity to T cell-mediated killing. Then, findings from the screening were integrated with the bioinformatics analysis of clinical datasets to further evaluate the role of each tumor intrinsic factor in governing antitumor immunity. The integrative analysis not only successfully identified several novel tumor intrinsic factors as effectors of immune resistance, but also demonstrated the distinct roles of these factors in controlling immune cell trafficking and tumor sensitivity to T cell-mediated killing. Among these factors, candidates controlling both rate-limiting steps were termed as "Dual immune resistance regulators" and the remaining factors whose expression were not associated with tumor immune infiltration were termed as "Cytotoxicity resistance regulators". By selecting PRMT1 and RIPK1 as representatives of the two groups respectively, we confirmed that genetically depletion of PRMT1 and RIPK1 sensitized tumors to T-cell mediated killing via two independent experimental approaches. Furthermore, inhibiting Prmt1 or Ripk1 tumors sensitizes tumors to cancer immunotherapy, such as anti-PD-1/anti-OX40 treatments (Tumor size (mm2) on day 21 after tumor inoculation: for anti-PD-1 treatment, Ctrl 84.05±23.10, PRMT1 KO 7.30±7.81, RIPK1 KO 2.03±4.96; similar results were also observed from anti-OX40 treatment) and extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, by using a RIPK1-specific inhibitor, GSK2982772, we demonstrated that targeting cytotoxicity resistance regulators could also enhance the antitumor activity of T cell-based cancer immunotherapy, despite limited impact on T cell tumor infiltration. Collectively, our data not only demonstrate the distinct immunoregulatory roles and therapeutic potentials of PRMT1 and RIPK1 in T cell-mediated antitumor activity, but also provides a rich resource of novel targets for rational immuno-oncology combinations.
Citation Format: Jiakai Hou, Yunfei Wang, Leilei Shi, Yuan Chen, Chunyu Xu, Arash Saeedi, Ke Pan, Ritu Bohat, Nicholas A. Egan, Jodi A. McKenzie, Rina M. Mbofung, Leila J. Williams, Zhenghuang Yang, Ming Sun, Xiaofang Liang, Jordi Rodon Ahnert, Navin Varadarajan, Cassian Yee, Yiwen Chen, Patrick Hwu, Weiyi Peng. The landscape of tumor intrinsic immune regulators revealed by genome-wide CRISPR immune screen integrated with comprehensive clinical data analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1575.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yunfei Wang
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Leilei Shi
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yuan Chen
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Ke Pan
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Rina M. Mbofung
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Zhenghuang Yang
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ming Sun
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Cassian Yee
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yiwen Chen
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- 2The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hou J, Wang Y, Shi L, Chen Y, Xu C, Saeedi A, Pan K, Bohat R, Egan NA, McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Williams LJ, Yang Z, Sun M, Liang X, Rodon Ahnert J, Varadarajan N, Yee C, Chen Y, Hwu P, Peng W. Integrating genome-wide CRISPR immune screen with multi-omic clinical data reveals distinct classes of tumor intrinsic immune regulators. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e001819. [PMID: 33589527 PMCID: PMC7887353 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite approval of immunotherapy for a wide range of cancers, the majority of patients fail to respond to immunotherapy or relapse following initial response. These failures may be attributed to immunosuppressive mechanisms co-opted by tumor cells. However, it is challenging to use conventional methods to systematically evaluate the potential of tumor intrinsic factors to act as immune regulators in patients with cancer. METHODS To identify immunosuppressive mechanisms in non-responders to cancer immunotherapy in an unbiased manner, we performed genome-wide CRISPR immune screens and integrated our results with multi-omics clinical data to evaluate the role of tumor intrinsic factors in regulating two rate-limiting steps of cancer immunotherapy, namely, T cell tumor infiltration and T cell-mediated tumor killing. RESULTS Our studies revealed two distinct types of immune resistance regulators and demonstrated their potential as therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. Among them, PRMT1 and RIPK1 were identified as a dual immune resistance regulator and a cytotoxicity resistance regulator, respectively. Although the magnitude varied between different types of immunotherapy, genetically targeting PRMT1 and RIPK1 sensitized tumors to T-cell killing and anti-PD-1/OX40 treatment. Interestingly, a RIPK1-specific inhibitor enhanced the antitumor activity of T cell-based and anti-OX40 therapy, despite limited impact on T cell tumor infiltration. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, the data provide a rich resource of novel targets for rational immuno-oncology combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiakai Hou
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yunfei Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leilei Shi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arash Saeedi
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ke Pan
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ritu Bohat
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicholas A Egan
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jodi A McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rina M Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leila J Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zhenhuang Yang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ming Sun
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xiaofang Liang
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon Ahnert
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Navin Varadarajan
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cassian Yee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yiwen Chen
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Punt S, Malu S, McKenzie JA, Manrique SZ, Doorduijn EM, Mbofung RM, Williams L, Silverman DA, Ashkin EL, Dominguez AL, Wang Z, Chen JQ, Maiti SN, Tieu TN, Liu C, Xu C, Forget MA, Haymaker C, Khalili JS, Satani N, Muller F, Cooper LJN, Overwijk WW, Amaria RN, Bernatchez C, Heffernan TP, Peng W, Roszik J, Hwu P. Aurora kinase inhibition sensitizes melanoma cells to T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 70:1101-1113. [PMID: 33123754 PMCID: PMC7979613 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although immunotherapy has achieved impressive durable clinical responses, many cancers respond only temporarily or not at all to immunotherapy. To find novel, targetable mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy, patient-derived melanoma cell lines were transduced with 576 open reading frames, or exposed to arrayed libraries of 850 bioactive compounds, prior to co-culture with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The synergy between the targets and TILs to induce apoptosis, and the mechanisms of inhibiting resistance to TILs were interrogated. Gene expression analyses were performed on tumor samples from patients undergoing immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Finally, the effect of inhibiting the top targets on the efficacy of immunotherapy was investigated in multiple preclinical models. Aurora kinase was identified as a mediator of melanoma cell resistance to T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in both complementary screens. Aurora kinase inhibitors were validated to synergize with T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. The Aurora kinase inhibition-mediated sensitivity to T-cell cytotoxicity was shown to be partially driven by p21-mediated induction of cellular senescence. The expression levels of Aurora kinase and related proteins were inversely correlated with immune infiltration, response to immunotherapy and survival in melanoma patients. Aurora kinase inhibition showed variable responses in combination with immunotherapy in vivo, suggesting its activity is modified by other factors in the tumor microenvironment. These data suggest that Aurora kinase inhibition enhances T-cell cytotoxicity in vitro and can potentiate antitumor immunity in vivo in some but not all settings. Further studies are required to determine the mechanism of primary resistance to this therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Punt
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shruti Malu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Immunitas Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jodi A McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA
| | - Soraya Zorro Manrique
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elien M Doorduijn
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rina M Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Merck Research Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Leila Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,KSQ Therapeutics Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Deborah A Silverman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emily L Ashkin
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ana Lucía Dominguez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Zhe Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Nature Cell Biology, Springer Nature, Shanghai City, China
| | - Jie Qing Chen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,EMD Serono, Rockland, MA, USA
| | - Sourindra N Maiti
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Trang N Tieu
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,C4 Therapeutics, Watertown, MA, USA
| | - Chengwen Liu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jahan S Khalili
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,SystImmune Inc., Redmond, WA, USA
| | - Nikunj Satani
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Florian Muller
- Department of Cancer Systems Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Laurence J N Cooper
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,ZIOPHARM Oncology Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | - Willem W Overwijk
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Nektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy P Heffernan
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peng W, Williams LJ, Xu C, Melendez B, McKenzie JA, Chen Y, Jackson HL, Voo KS, Mbofung RM, Leahey SE, Wang J, Lizee G, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Hoos A, Smothers J, Srinivasan R, Paul EM, Yanamandra N, Hwu P. Anti-OX40 Antibody Directly Enhances The Function of Tumor-Reactive CD8 + T Cells and Synergizes with PI3Kβ Inhibition in PTEN Loss Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:6406-6416. [PMID: 31371342 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OX40 agonist-based combinations are emerging as a novel avenue to improve the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy. To better guide its clinical development, we characterized the role of the OX40 pathway in tumor-reactive immune cells. We also evaluated combining OX40 agonists with targeted therapy to combat resistance to cancer immunotherapy.Experimental Design: We utilized patient-derived tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and multiple preclinical models to determine the direct effect of anti-OX40 agonistic antibodies on tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. We also evaluated the antitumor activity of an anti-OX40 antibody plus PI3Kβ inhibition in a transgenic murine melanoma model (Braf mutant, PTEN null), which spontaneously develops immunotherapy-resistant melanomas. RESULTS We observed elevated expression of OX40 in tumor-reactive CD8+ TILs upon encountering tumors; activation of OX40 signaling enhanced their cytotoxic function. OX40 agonist antibody improved the antitumor activity of CD8+ T cells and the generation of tumor-specific T-cell memory in vivo. Furthermore, combining anti-OX40 with GSK2636771, a PI3Kβ-selective inhibitor, delayed tumor growth and extended the survival of mice with PTEN-null melanomas. This combination treatment did not increase the number of TILs, but it instead significantly enhanced proliferation of CD8+ TILs and elevated the serum levels of CCL4, CXCL10, and IFNγ, which are mainly produced by memory and/or effector T cells. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight a critical role of OX40 activation in potentiating the effector function of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells and suggest further evaluation of OX40 agonist-based combinations in patients with immune-resistant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Leila J Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brenda Melendez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jodi A McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather L Jackson
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Kui S Voo
- Department of Oncology Research for Biologics and Immunotherapy Translation Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rina M Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sara Elizabeth Leahey
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gregory Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Axel Hoos
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - James Smothers
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Roopa Srinivasan
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Elaine M Paul
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania
| | - Niranjan Yanamandra
- Oncology R&D, Immuno-Oncology and Combinations RU, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Malu S, Zhang M, Ashkin E, Devi S, Williams L, Tieu T, Peng W, Pradeep S, Xu C, Zorro Manrique S, Liu C, Huang L, Chen Y, Forget MA, Haymaker C, Bernatchez C, Satani N, Muller F, Roszik J, Kalra A, Heffernan T, Sood A, Hu J, Amaria R, Davis RE, Hwu P. The Effect of Topoisomerase I Inhibitors on the Efficacy of T-Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 110:777-786. [PMID: 29267866 PMCID: PMC6037061 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy has increasingly become a staple in cancer treatment. However, substantial limitations in the durability of response highlight the need for more rational therapeutic combinations. The aim of this study is to investigate how to make tumor cells more sensitive to T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Methods Two pairs of melanoma patient-derived tumor cell lines and their autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were utilized in a high-throughput screen of 850 compounds to identify bioactive agents that could be used in combinatorial strategies to improve T-cell-mediated killing of tumor cells. RNAi, overexpression, and gene expression analyses were utilized to identify the mechanism underlying the effect of Topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors on T-cell-mediated killing. Using a syngeneic mouse model (n = 5 per group), the antitumor efficacy of the combination of a clinically relevant Top1 inhibitor, liposomal irinotecan (MM-398), with immune checkpoint inhibitors was also assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results We found that Top1 inhibitors increased the sensitivity of patient-derived melanoma cell lines (n = 7) to T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity (P < .001, Dunnett’s test). This enhancement is mediated by TP53INP1, whose overexpression increased the susceptibility of melanoma cell lines to T-cell cytotoxicity (2549 cell line: P = .009, unpaired t test), whereas its knockdown impeded T-cell killing of Top1 inhibitor–treated melanoma cells (2549 cell line: P < .001, unpaired t test). In vivo, greater tumor control was achieved with MM-398 in combination with α-PD-L1 or α-PD1 (P < .001, Tukey’s test). Prolonged survival was also observed in tumor-bearing mice treated with MM-398 in combination with α-PD-L1 (P = .002, log-rank test) or α-PD1 (P = .008, log-rank test). Conclusions We demonstrated that Top1 inhibitors can improve the antitumor efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, thus providing the basis for developing novel strategies using Top1 inhibitors to augment the efficacy of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sunila Pradeep
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology
| | | | | | - Lu Huang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ashish Kalra
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - Anil Sood
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine.,Center for RNA Interference and Non-coding RNA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang L, Malu S, McKenzie JA, Andrews MC, Talukder AH, Tieu T, Karpinets T, Haymaker C, Forget MA, Williams LJ, Wang Z, Mbofung RM, Wang ZQ, Davis RE, Lo RS, Wargo JA, Davies MA, Bernatchez C, Heffernan T, Amaria RN, Korkut A, Peng W, Roszik J, Lizée G, Woodman SE, Hwu P. The RNA-binding Protein MEX3B Mediates Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy by Downregulating HLA-A Expression. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:3366-3376. [PMID: 29496759 PMCID: PMC9872773 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-2483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer immunotherapy has shown promising clinical outcomes in many patients. However, some patients still fail to respond, and new strategies are needed to overcome resistance. The purpose of this study was to identify novel genes and understand the mechanisms that confer resistance to cancer immunotherapy.Experimental Design: To identify genes mediating resistance to T-cell killing, we performed an open reading frame (ORF) screen of a kinome library to study whether overexpression of a gene in patient-derived melanoma cells could inhibit their susceptibility to killing by autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL).Results: The RNA-binding protein MEX3B was identified as a top candidate that decreased the susceptibility of melanoma cells to killing by TILs. Further analyses of anti-PD-1-treated melanoma patient tumor samples suggested that higher MEX3B expression is associated with resistance to PD-1 blockade. In addition, significantly decreased levels of IFNγ were secreted from TILs incubated with MEX3B-overexpressing tumor cells. Interestingly, this phenotype was rescued upon overexpression of exogenous HLA-A2. Consistent with this, we observed decreased HLA-A expression in MEX3B-overexpressing tumor cells. Finally, luciferase reporter assays and RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation assays suggest that this is due to MEX3B binding to the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of HLA-A to destabilize the mRNA.Conclusions: MEX3B mediates resistance to cancer immunotherapy by binding to the 3' UTR of HLA-A to destabilize the HLA-A mRNA and thus downregulate HLA-A expression on the surface of tumor cells, thereby making the tumor cells unable to be recognized and killed by T cells. Clin Cancer Res; 24(14); 3366-76. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Kalbasi and Ribas, p. 3239.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Huang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shruti Malu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jodi A. McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Miles C. Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amjad H. Talukder
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Trang Tieu
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Leila J. Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhe Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rina M. Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Zhi-Qiang Wang
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Eric Davis
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roger S. Lo
- Department of Medicine, The University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Timothy Heffernan
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rodabe N. Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anil Korkut
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gregory Lizée
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E. Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peng W, Xu C, Melendez B, Jackson H, McKenzi JA, Williams LJ, Chen Y, Mbofung RM, Leahey SELE, Lizee G, Davies MA, Yanamandra N, Hwu P. Abstract 4938: OX40 agonist antibody-based combination therapy with PI3Kβ selective inhibitor enhances T cell immunity. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-4938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
OX40 (CD134), a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family member, plays a critical role in initiating signaling cascades required for full activation of tumor-reactive T cells. Due to its distinct mechanism of action, the use of OX40 agonist-based combinations is emerging as a novel avenue to improve the effectiveness of cancer treatments. Our recently published studies demonstrate that oncogenic activation of the PI3K pathway by loss of the expression of tumor suppressor PTEN, imposes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in favor of tumor immune evasion. These results highlight the therapeutic potential of combinational therapy using OX40 agonists and PI3K inhibitors in cancer patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the combination of an OX40 agonist antibody and a PI3Kβ selective inhibitor, GSK2636771, in tumors with PTEN loss. By using a genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model of melanoma, which can spontaneously develop tumors with PTEN loss, we observed that combination therapy using anti-OX40 and GSK2636771 significantly delayed tumor growth and improved survival time of mice bearing PTEN loss tumors. This combinational treatment was also well tolerated in experimental mice. Unlike the combination of GSK2636771 and immune checkpoint blockers, this combinational treatment did not result in an increase in the number of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells, but significantly enhanced the percentage of Ki67+ CD8+ T cells at the tumor site when compared to either treatment alone. These results suggest that GSK2636771 treatment can synergize with OX40 agonists to augment effector functions of tumor-reactive T cells. To further confirm this synergistic effect, we measured serum levels of 45 cytokines/chemokines in tumor-bearing mice receiving anti-OX40 alone or in combination with GSK2636771. Serum levels of CCL4, CXCL10 and IFN-γ, which are mainly produced by memory and/or effector T cells, were significantly increased in mice in the combination cohort in comparison to the monotherapy cohorts. More importantly, using a vaccine mouse model, we demonstrate that GSK2636771 in combination with anti-OX40 did not significantly impair the generation and maintenance of memory T cells. Taken together, our results suggest that the combinational approach of an OX40 agonist antibody and GSK2636771 may induce robust and durable antitumor T cell immunity. Our study also provides a rationale to explore the clinical activity of an OX40 agonist antibody in combination with GSK2636771 in cancer patients with PTEN loss tumors.
Citation Format: Weiyi Peng, Chunyu Xu, Brenda Melendez, Heather Jackson, Jodi A. McKenzi, Leila J. Williams, Yuan Chen, Rina M. Mbofung, Sara E. Leahey E. Leahey, Greg Lizee, Michael A. Davies, Niranjan Yanamandra, Patrick Hwu. OX40 agonist antibody-based combination therapy with PI3Kβ selective inhibitor enhances T cell immunity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4938.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyi Peng
- 1UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | - Chunyu Xu
- 1UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Yuan Chen
- 1UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Greg Lizee
- 1UT MD Anderson Cancer Ctr., Houston, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cascone T, McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Punt S, Wang Z, Xu C, Williams LJ, Wang Z, Bristow CA, Carugo A, Peoples MD, Li L, Karpinets T, Huang L, Malu S, Creasy C, Leahey SE, Chen J, Chen Y, Pelicano H, Bernatchez C, Gopal YNV, Heffernan TP, Hu J, Wang J, Amaria RN, Garraway LA, Huang P, Yang P, Wistuba II, Woodman SE, Roszik J, Davis RE, Davies MA, Heymach JV, Hwu P, Peng W. Increased Tumor Glycolysis Characterizes Immune Resistance to Adoptive T Cell Therapy. Cell Metab 2018; 27:977-987.e4. [PMID: 29628419 PMCID: PMC5932208 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 353] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) produces durable responses in some cancer patients; however, most tumors are refractory to ACT and the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance are unclear. Using two independent approaches, we identified tumor glycolysis as a pathway associated with immune resistance in melanoma. Glycolysis-related genes were upregulated in melanoma and lung cancer patient samples poorly infiltrated by T cells. Overexpression of glycolysis-related molecules impaired T cell killing of tumor cells, whereas inhibition of glycolysis enhanced T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, glycolysis-related gene expression was higher in melanoma tissues from ACT-refractory patients, and tumor cells derived from these patients exhibited higher glycolytic activity. We identified reduced levels of IRF1 and CXCL10 immunostimulatory molecules in highly glycolytic melanoma cells. Our findings demonstrate that tumor glycolysis is associated with the efficacy of ACT and identify the glycolysis pathway as a candidate target for combinatorial therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Cascone
- Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jodi A McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rina M Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Simone Punt
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhe Wang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Leila J Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zhiqiang Wang
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Christopher A Bristow
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alessandro Carugo
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael D Peoples
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lerong Li
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Shruti Malu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Caitlin Creasy
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Sara E Leahey
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jiong Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yuan Chen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Helen Pelicano
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Y N Vashisht Gopal
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Timothy P Heffernan
- Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jianhua Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Levi A Garraway
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Peiying Yang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R Eric Davis
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mbofung RM, McKenzie JA, Malu S, Zhang M, Peng W, Liu C, Kuiatse I, Tieu T, Williams L, Devi S, Ashkin E, Xu C, Huang L, Zhang M, Talukder AH, Tripathi SC, Khong H, Satani N, Muller FL, Roszik J, Heffernan T, Allison JP, Lizee G, Hanash SM, Proia D, Amaria R, Davis RE, Hwu P. HSP90 inhibition enhances cancer immunotherapy by upregulating interferon response genes. Nat Commun 2017; 8:451. [PMID: 28878208 PMCID: PMC5587668 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00449-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
T-cell-based immunotherapies are promising treatments for cancer patients. Although durable responses can be achieved in some patients, many patients fail to respond to these therapies, underscoring the need for improvement with combination therapies. From a screen of 850 bioactive compounds, we identify HSP90 inhibitors as candidates for combination with immunotherapy. We show that inhibition of HSP90 with ganetespib enhances T-cell-mediated killing of patient-derived human melanoma cells by their autologous T cells in vitro and potentiates responses to anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 therapy in vivo. Mechanistic studies reveal that HSP90 inhibition results in upregulation of interferon response genes, which are essential for the enhanced killing of ganetespib treated melanoma cells by T cells. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that HSP90 inhibition can potentiate T-cell-mediated anti-tumor immune responses, and rationale to explore the combination of immunotherapy and HSP90 inhibitors. Many patients fail to respond to T cell based immunotherapies. Here, the authors, through a high-throughput screening, identify HSP90 inhibitors as a class of preferred drugs for treatment combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina M Mbofung
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jodi A McKenzie
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shruti Malu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Min Zhang
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma Unit 903, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Weiyi Peng
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chengwen Liu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Isere Kuiatse
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma Unit 903, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Trang Tieu
- Institute for Applied Cancer Sciences Unit 1956, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Leila Williams
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Seram Devi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emily Ashkin
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Chunyu Xu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lu Huang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Minying Zhang
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Amjad H Talukder
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Satyendra C Tripathi
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention Unit 1013, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hiep Khong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Nikunj Satani
- Cancer Imaging Systems Unit 1907, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Florian L Muller
- Cancer Imaging Systems Unit 1907, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Timothy Heffernan
- Institute for Applied Cancer Sciences Unit 1956, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology Unit 901, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Gregory Lizee
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sam M Hanash
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention Unit 1013, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - David Proia
- Synta Pharmaceuticals Inc., 45 Hartwell Avenue, Lexington, MA, 02421, USA
| | - Rodabe Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - R Eric Davis
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma Unit 903, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology Unit 904, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Malu S, Amaria RN, Ashkin EL, Devi SN, Peng W, Williams LJ, Davis RE, Roszik J, Tieu TN, Heffernan T, Hwu P. Abstract B110: Topoisomerase I inhibitors enhance efficacy of immunotherapy through a p53 regulatory pathway. Cancer Immunol Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.imm2016-b110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for a number of cancer patients, with some achieving durable and long lasting clinical benefit. Cancer immunotherapy engages and intensifies the host immune response to attack and kill tumor cells. However, as evidenced by the heterogeneous response to immunotherapy, tumor cells have evolved a host of known and unknown mechanisms to evade, inhibit or supersede the immune response. Consequently, scientists and clinicians are unable to accurately predict which patients will respond, or how well they will respond to cancer immunotherapy.To address this shortfall, we have asked the question of how we can modulate tumor cells in order to make them more amenable to immunotherapy, thereby increasing its efficacy. We approached this question by conducting a high throughput drug screen of 850 compounds, to identify bioactive drugs that can increase T cell mediated killing of tumor cells. The goal here is to develop rational combination treatment strategies involving T cell based cancer immunotherapy that will increase the breadth and depth of the clinical response to cancer immunotherapy. One of three top hits from the screen was Topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors including irinotecan, topotecan, and camptothecin. We then utilized multiple patient-derived cell lines in an in vitro cytotoxicity assay to validate that treatment of melanoma tumor cells with a Top1 inhibitor, before incubation with their autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) results in a synergistic increase in T cell mediated killing of tumor cells.These findings were further corroborated in a pre-clinical mouse model, where we found that tumor-bearing mice treated with a combination of a clinically relevant Top1 inhibitor nal-IRI (nano-liposomal irinotecan) and an anti-PD-L1 antibody, showed enhanced tumor regression compared to mice treated with either single agent (mean tumor volume: combo vs nal-IRI vs α-PDL1 = 40.04 ± 5.66 vs 136.30 ± 28.96 vs 373.04 ± 23.96 mm3 respectively, on day 21 after tumor inoculation, p < 0.0001). Significantly longer survival was also achieved in tumor-bearing mice treated with the combination in comparison to cohorts treated with either single agent. To investigate the molecular changes being mediated by Top1 inhibitors in the tumor cells, we conducted gene expression analysis on Top1 inhibitor-treated tumor cells. One striking gene expression change in Top1 inhibitor-treated tumor cells was an upregulation of a number of genes known to be functionally important for p53 signaling including TP53INP1 (Teap). We then focused on the functional relevance of Teap to the increased T cell mediated killing of Top1 inhibitor-treated melanoma cells. Overexpression of Teap in melanoma cells resulted in increased T cell mediated killing, recapitulating the phenotype observed in Top1 inhibitor-treated melanoma cells. Complementary to this, silencing of Teap via shRNA in melanoma cells, inhibited T cell mediated killing of Top1 inhibitor-treated cells, indicating that the enhancement of T cell mediated killing observed in Top1 inhibitor-treated cells is dependent on the p53 regulatory gene Teap. These results support our goal of developing combinations involving T cell based cancer immunotherapy to improve therapeutic efficacy in cancer patients. We have demonstrated that Top1 inhibitors can be effectively combined with T cell based cancer immunotherapy. The results are also indicative of a role for p53 signaling in regulating response to T cell based immunotherapy. By understanding the molecular mechanisms in the tumor that can dictate response or resistance to immunotherapy, we can develop a more comprehensive picture of the cancer immunity response cycle and develop more effective strategies to combat not only melanoma, but also other tumor types where immunotherapy is not yet applicable.
Citation Format: Jodi A. McKenzie, Rina M. Mbofung, Shruti Malu, Rodabe N. Amaria, Emily L. Ashkin, Seram N. Devi, Weiyi Peng, Leila J. Williams, Richard E. Davis, Jason Roszik, Trang N. Tieu, Timothy Heffernan, Patrick Hwu. Topoisomerase I inhibitors enhance efficacy of immunotherapy through a p53 regulatory pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Seram N. Devi
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Weiyi Peng
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Jason Roszik
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Trang N. Tieu
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Patrick Hwu
- 1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mbofung RM, McKenzie JA, Malu S, Liu C, Peng W, Kuiatse I, Williams L, Devi S, Wang Z, Tieu T, Heffernan T, Davis RE, Amaria R, Hwu P. Abstract B105: HSP90 inhibitor, ganetespib, enhances responses to cancer immunotherapy through increased expression of interferon response genes. Cancer Immunol Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.imm2016-b105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recently, T cell based immunotherapies have moved to the forefront of cancer immunotherapy with the success of Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) and Immune checkpoint blockade. ACT, where patients are treated with tumor infiltrating T cells (TILs), conferred a clinical response rate of ∼50%. Treatment with anti-CTLA4 therapy, Ipilimumab, conferred response rates of 10-20%, greatly improving the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma. Despite the encouraging outcomes, there are relatively low response rates coupled with the delay of weeks to months before tumor shrinkage can be appreciated. Thus, understanding mechanisms of resistance to immune therapies, to improve response rates, shorten time to treatment effect and developing predictive biomarkers of response are vital to the care of melanoma patients. In order to identify possible resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy, a high-throughput in vitro screen with 850 different bio-active compounds (Selleckchem), was designed to search for agents that could either increase or decrease the resistance of melanoma tumor cells to T cell mediated killing. Paired patient derived human melanoma tumor samples and TILs were used to assess which compounds when used to treat the melanoma cell lines can enhance the cytotoxic activity of the TILs against the paired melanoma sample, using a flow cytometry based assay in which active caspase 3 was used as a read out of apoptosis. We identified heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors amongst the top compounds that improved T cell mediated cytotoxicity of treated tumor cells. We show that treatment with the HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib (Synta) greatly improves T cell mediated cytotoxicity of human cancer cells lines in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo murine studies using the MC38/gp100 tumor model show that ganestespib in combination with anti-CTLA4, resulted in superior antitumor effect and survival compared to either treatment alone (Average tumor volume at day 21 of treatment: Vehicle 294.3mm3, α-CTLA4 193 mm3, Ganetespib 237.5 mm3 and Ganetespib + α-CTLA4 105.8 mm3, P < 0.0001). Microarray analysis of human cell lines treated with ganetespib in vitro revealed an increase in interferon response genes including IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3. We confirmed these findings with quantitative real time PCR and western blot analyses and found IFIT1, IFIT2 and IFIT3 to be consistently upregulated across multiple melanoma cell lines following treatment with ganetespib. We next sought to verify the importance of the IFIT genes in the synergy observed between ganetespib treatment and T cell killing. First, we overexpressed IFIT1, IFIT2 and IFIT3 in human melanoma cell lines to recapitulate the improved sensitivity of the human melanoma cell lines to T cell killing following treatment with ganetespib. We then co-cultured these cells with their autologous T cells and found that overexpressing IFIT1, IFIT2 and IFIT3 mimicked the effects of ganetespib by increasing the sensitivity to T cell killing over the GFP control. On the other hand, silencing IFIT1, IFIT2 and IFIT3 simultaneously, abrogated the synergy between ganetespib and T cell killing. We are further elucidating the role of these genes in lowering the apoptotic threshold of cancer cells and contributing to the synergy of ganetespib and immunotherapy. This will enable the emergence of a new combination therapy of HSP90 inhibitors and anti-CTLA4 for the treatment of melanoma patients that will increase the percentage of patients responding to immunotherapy and achieving long term responses.
Citation Format: Rina M. Mbofung, Jodi A. McKenzie, Shruti Malu, Chengwen Liu, Weiyi Peng, Isere Kuiatse, Leila Williams, Seram Devi, Zhe Wang, Trang Tieu, Tim Heffernan, Richard E. Davis, Rodabe Amaria, Patrick Hwu. HSP90 inhibitor, ganetespib, enhances responses to cancer immunotherapy through increased expression of interferon response genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Second CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; 2016 Sept 25-28; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B105.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhe Wang
- 1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mbofung RM, McKenzie JA, Malu S, Liu C, Williams L, Peng W, Wang Z, Tripathi S, Tieu T, Zhao S, Devi S, Kuiatse I, Ashkin E, Bailey L, Roszik J, Hanash S, Heffernan T, Davis RE, Amaria RN, Hwu P. Abstract 4360: Inhibition of HSP90 enhances T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses through expression of interferon-alpha response Genes. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-4360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Recently, T cell based immunotherapies have moved to the forefront of cancer immunotherapy with the success of Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) and Immune checkpoint blockade. ACT, where patients are treated with tumor infiltrating T cells (TILs), conferred a clinical response rate of ∼50%. Treatment with anti-CTLA4 therapy, Ipilimumab, conferred response rates of 10-20%, greatly improving the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma. Despite the encouraging outcomes, there are relatively low response rates coupled with the delay of weeks to months before tumor shrinkage can be appreciated. Thus, understanding mechanisms of resistance to immune therapies, to improve response rates, shorten time to treatment effect and developing predictive biomarkers of response are vital to the care of melanoma patients. In order to identify possible resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy, a high-throughput in vitro screen with 850 different bio-active compounds (Selleckchem), was designed to search for agents that could either increase or decrease the resistance of melanoma tumor cells to T cell mediated killing. Paired tumor samples and TILs from melanoma patients were used to assess which compounds when used to treat the melanoma cell lines can enhance the cytotoxic activity of the TILs against the paired melanoma sample, using a flow cytometry based assay in which active caspase 3 was used as a read out of apoptosis. We identified heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors amongst compounds that improved T cell mediated cytotoxicity. We show that treatment with the HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib (Synta) greatly improves T cell mediated cytotoxicity of both human and murine cancer cells lines in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo murine studies using the MC38/gp100 tumor model show that ganestespib in combination with anti-CTLA4, resulted in superior antitumor effect and survival compared to either treatment alone (Average tumor volume at day 21 of treatment: Vehicle 294.3mm3, α-CTLA4 193 mm3, Ganetespib 237.5 mm3 and Ganetespib + α-CTLA4 105.8 mm3, P < 0.0001). Microarray analysis of human cell lines treated with ganetespib in vitro revealed an increase in interferon alpha (IFN-α) response genes including IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3 and IFIH1. Silencing IFIT2 abrogated the synergy observed with ganetespib treatment and T cell mediated killing, suggesting that the IFN-α response pathway plays an important role in this combination therapy. We are further elucidating the role of these genes in the synergy observed. This will enable the emergence of a new combination therapy of HSP90 inhibitors and anti-CTLA4 for the treatment of melanoma patients that will increase the percentage of patients responding to immunotherapy and achieving long term responses.
Citation Format: Rina M. Mbofung, Jodi A. McKenzie, Shruti Malu, Chengwen Liu, Leila Williams, Weiyi Peng, Zhe Wang, Satyendra Tripathi, Trang Tieu, Shuping Zhao, Seram Devi, Isere Kuiatse, Emily Ashkin, Leah Bailey, Jason Roszik, Samir Hanash, Timothy Heffernan, Richard E. Davis, Rodabe N. Amaria, Patrick Hwu. Inhibition of HSP90 enhances T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses through expression of interferon-alpha response Genes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4360.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Zhe Wang
- 1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Malu S, Amaria RN, Davis RE, Zhang L, Tieu TN, Heffernan TP, Hwu P. Abstract 4002: Enhancing the antitumor efficacy of immunotherapy by using the topoisomerase I inhibitor MM398. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-4002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, whose rates of morbidity and mortality are increasing. The development of immunotherapies like anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies has resulted in fundamental advances in the treatment of some cancers. However, long lasting responses are only observed in a subset of immunotherapy-treated patients. This shortfall highlights the need for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern tumor response to immunotherapy.
To address this need, autologous patient-derived tumor cell lines and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were utilized in an in vitro high throughput screen, to identify compounds that increase the sensitivity of melanoma cells to T cell mediated cytotoxicity. The screen consisted of an 850 compound library. One group of compounds that was most able to enhance T cell killing of melanoma cells was topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan.
Our results indicate that treatment of melanoma cells with a Top1 inhibitor prior to exposure to autologous T cells produced a synergistic increase in tumor cell death, as measured by intracellular staining of activated caspase 3. We have also recapitulated this finding in an in vivo model, where a better anti-tumor effect was observed in tumor bearing mice treated with an antibody against the co-inhibitory molecule PDL1 in combination with MM398 (nanoliposomal irinotecan), than in cohorts treated with either α-PDL1 or Top1 inhibitor alone. These findings suggest synergism between Top1 inhibitors and immune-based therapies in the treatment of melanoma.
Molecular changes elicited by inhibition of Top1 are now being investigated to identify the factors that mediate the effect of Top1 inhibitors on T cell-mediated killing of melanoma. We have identified a p53-driven gene signature in Top1 inhibitor-treated melanoma cell lines and are investigating the functional relevance of Tumor Protein p53 Inducible Nuclear Protein 1 (TP53INP1) in mediating increased T cell killing of Top1 inhibitor-treated melanoma cells. Our results indicate that TP53INP1 is a critical component of this apoptotic response, as overexpression of TP53INP1 in melanoma cells increased their susceptibility to T cell mediated cytotoxicity. Complementary to this observation, we have also found that knockdown of TP53INP1 by shRNA, impedes the sensitivity of Top1 inhibitor-treated melanoma cells to T cell mediated killing.
Understanding how Top1 inhibitors enhance melanoma killing by immunotherapy will allow for the development of predictive biomarkers, and also augment immune-based therapeutic strategies to ensure durable responses in a larger population of melanoma patients. By using melanoma as a model disease system, we can gain valuable insights into the dynamics of cancer immune response that may be applied to other cancers where effective treatment strategies are also lacking.
Citation Format: Jodi A. McKenzie, Rina M. Mbofung, Shruti Malu, Rodabe N. Amaria, Richard E. Davis, Li Zhang, Trang N. Tieu, Tim P. Heffernan, Patrick Hwu. Enhancing the antitumor efficacy of immunotherapy by using the topoisomerase I inhibitor MM398. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rina M. Mbofung
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shruti Malu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Li Zhang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Trang N. Tieu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McKenzie JA, Mbofung RM, Malu S, Hwu P. Abstract B152: Increasing the antitumor efficacy of immunotherapy in melanoma by using topoisomerase I inhibitors. Cancer Immunol Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/2326-6074.cricimteatiaacr15-b152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, whose rates of morbidity and mortality are continuously increasing. The development of immunotherapeutic agents like anti-PDL1 and anti-CTLA4 antibodies has resulted in fundamental advances in the treatment of melanoma. However, long lasting responses are only observed in a small subset of immunotherapy-treated melanoma patients. This shortfall highlights the need for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern tumor sensitivity or resistance to immunotherapy. To address this need, autologous patient-derived tumor cell lines and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were utilized in an in vitro activated caspase 3-based high-throughput screen, to identify compounds that increase the sensitivity of melanoma cells to T-cell mediated cytotoxicity. The screen consisted of a library of 850 bioactive compounds. One group of compounds that was most able to enhance T-cell killing of melanoma cells was topoisomerase I (Top1) inhibitors including: topotecan, and irinotecan.
Topoisomerases are a family of DNA enzymes, which are involved in unwinding DNA and relieving torsional strain during replication and transcription. Our results indicate that treatment of melanoma tumor cells with a Top1 inhibitor prior to exposure to autologous T cells, produced a synergistic increase in tumor cell death, as measured by intracellular staining of activated caspase 3, and computed using CalcuSyn. We have also recapitulated this finding in an in vivo model, where a better anti-tumor effect was observed in tumor- bearing mice treated with an antibody against the co-inhibitory molecule Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PDL1) in combination with a nanoparticle liposomal formulation of irinotecan, than in cohorts treated with either antibody or drug alone. These findings suggest synergism between Top1 inhibitors and immune-based therapies in the treatment of melanoma.
Genomic and proteomic changes elicited by inhibition of Top1 are now being investigated to identify the molecular factors that mediate the effect of Top1 inhibitors on T cell-mediated killing of melanoma. Our goal is to identify molecular changes mediated by Top1 inhibition in melanoma tumor cells, and/or the tumor microenvironment, that relieves immunosuppression and potentiates the activity of cytotoxic T cell-based immunotherapy.
Understanding how Top1 inhibitors enhance melanoma killing by immunotherapy will allow for the development of predictive biomarkers, and also augment immune-based therapeutic strategies to ensure durable responses in a larger population of melanoma patients. By using melanoma as a model disease system, we can gain valuable insights into the dynamics of cancer immune response that may be applied to other cancers where effective treatment strategies are also lacking.
Citation Format: Jodi A. McKenzie, Rina M. Mbofung, Shruti Malu, Patrick Hwu. Increasing the antitumor efficacy of immunotherapy in melanoma by using topoisomerase I inhibitors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR Inaugural International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; September 16-19, 2015; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2016;4(1 Suppl):Abstract nr B152.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rina M. Mbofung
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shruti Malu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu C, Peng W, Xu C, Lou Y, Zhang M, Wargo JA, Chen JQ, Li HS, Watowich SS, Yang Y, Tompers Frederick D, Cooper ZA, Mbofung RM, Whittington M, Flaherty KT, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Radvanyi LG, Overwijk WW, Lizée G, Hwu P. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res 2013. [PMID: 23204132 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-1626.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of melanoma patients with selective BRAF inhibitors results in objective clinical responses in the majority of patients with BRAF-mutant tumors. However, resistance to these inhibitors develops within a few months. In this study, we test the hypothesis that BRAF inhibition in combination with adoptive T-cell transfer (ACT) will be more effective at inducing long-term clinical regressions of BRAF-mutant tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN BRAF-mutated human melanoma tumor cell lines transduced to express gp100 and H-2D(b) to allow recognition by gp100-specific pmel-1 T cells were used as xenograft models to assess melanocyte differentiation antigen-independent enhancement of immune responses by BRAF inhibitor PLX4720. Luciferase-expressing pmel-1 T cells were generated to monitor T-cell migration in vivo. The expression of VEGF was determined by ELISA, protein array, and immunohistochemistry. Importantly, VEGF expression after BRAF inhibition was tested in a set of patient samples. RESULTS We found that administration of PLX4720 significantly increased tumor infiltration of adoptively transferred T cells in vivo and enhanced the antitumor activity of ACT. This increased T-cell infiltration was primarily mediated by the ability of PLX4720 to inhibit melanoma tumor cell production of VEGF by reducing the binding of c-myc to the VEGF promoter. Furthermore, analysis of human melanoma patient tumor biopsies before and during BRAF inhibitor treatment showed downregulation of VEGF consistent with the preclinical murine model. CONCLUSION These findings provide a strong rationale to evaluate the potential clinical application of combining BRAF inhibition with T-cell-based immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengwen Liu
- Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology and Immunology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu C, Peng W, Xu C, Lou Y, Zhang M, Wargo JA, Chen JQ, Li HS, Watowich SS, Yang Y, Tompers Frederick D, Cooper ZA, Mbofung RM, Whittington M, Flaherty KT, Woodman SE, Davies MA, Radvanyi LG, Overwijk WW, Lizée G, Hwu P. BRAF inhibition increases tumor infiltration by T cells and enhances the antitumor activity of adoptive immunotherapy in mice. Clin Cancer Res 2012. [PMID: 23204132 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-1626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 305] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment of melanoma patients with selective BRAF inhibitors results in objective clinical responses in the majority of patients with BRAF-mutant tumors. However, resistance to these inhibitors develops within a few months. In this study, we test the hypothesis that BRAF inhibition in combination with adoptive T-cell transfer (ACT) will be more effective at inducing long-term clinical regressions of BRAF-mutant tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN BRAF-mutated human melanoma tumor cell lines transduced to express gp100 and H-2D(b) to allow recognition by gp100-specific pmel-1 T cells were used as xenograft models to assess melanocyte differentiation antigen-independent enhancement of immune responses by BRAF inhibitor PLX4720. Luciferase-expressing pmel-1 T cells were generated to monitor T-cell migration in vivo. The expression of VEGF was determined by ELISA, protein array, and immunohistochemistry. Importantly, VEGF expression after BRAF inhibition was tested in a set of patient samples. RESULTS We found that administration of PLX4720 significantly increased tumor infiltration of adoptively transferred T cells in vivo and enhanced the antitumor activity of ACT. This increased T-cell infiltration was primarily mediated by the ability of PLX4720 to inhibit melanoma tumor cell production of VEGF by reducing the binding of c-myc to the VEGF promoter. Furthermore, analysis of human melanoma patient tumor biopsies before and during BRAF inhibitor treatment showed downregulation of VEGF consistent with the preclinical murine model. CONCLUSION These findings provide a strong rationale to evaluate the potential clinical application of combining BRAF inhibition with T-cell-based immunotherapy for the treatment of patients with melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengwen Liu
- Departments of Melanoma Medical Oncology and Immunology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|