HLA-B27 did not protect against COVID-19 in patients with axial spondyloarthritis - data from the ReumaCov-Brasil Registry

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested the HLA-B27 gene may protect against some infections, as well as it could play a benefit role on the viral clearance, including hepatitis C and HIV. However, there is lack of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic data in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of HLA-B27 gene positivity on the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 and disease activity in axial SpA patients.

METHODS

The ReumaCoV-Brasil is a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort designed to monitor immune-mediated rheumatic diseases patients during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Brazil. Axial SpA patients, according to the ASAS classification criteria (2009), and only those with known HLA-B27 status, were included in this ReumaCov-Brasil's subanalysis. After pairing them to sex and age, they were divided in two groups: with (cases) and without (control group) COVID-19 diagnosis. Other immunodeficiency diseases, past organ or bone marrow transplantation, neoplasms and current chemotherapy were excluded. Demographic data, managing of COVID-19 (diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes, including hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and death), comorbidities, clinical details (disease activity and concomitant medication) were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. Data are presented as descriptive analysis and multiple regression models, using SPSS program, version 20. P level was set as 5%.

RESULTS

From May 24th, 2020 to Jan 24th, 2021, a total of 153 axial SpA patients were included, of whom 85 (55.5%) with COVID-19 and 68 (44.4%) without COVID-19. Most of them were men (N = 92; 60.1%) with mean age of 44.0 ± 11.1 years and long-term disease (11.7 ± 9.9 years). Regarding the HLA-B27 status, 112 (73.2%) patients tested positive. There were no significant statistical differences concerning social distancing, smoking, BMI (body mass index), waist circumference and comorbidities. Regarding biological DMARDs, 110 (71.8%) were on TNF inhibitors and 14 (9.15%) on IL-17 antagonists. Comparing those patients with and without COVID-19, the HLA-B27 positivity was not different between groups (n = 64, 75.3% vs. n = 48, 48%, respectively; p = 0.514). In addition, disease activity was similar before and after the infection. Interestingly, no new episodes of arthritis, enthesitis or extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were reported after the COVID-19. The mean time from the first symptoms to hospitalization was 7.1 ± 3.4 days, and although the number of hospitalization days was numerically higher in the B27 positive group, no statistically significant difference was observed (5.7 ± 4.11 for B27 negative patients and 13.5 ± 14.8 for B27 positive patients; p = 0.594). Only one HLA-B27 negative patient died. No significant difference was found regarding concomitant medications, including conventional or biologic DMARDs between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference of COVID-19 frequency rate was observed in patients with axial SpA regarding the HLA-B27 positivity, suggesting a lack of protective effect with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, the disease activity was similar before and after the infection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved by the Brazilian Committee of Ethics in Human Research (CONEP), CAAE 30186820.2.1001.8807, and was registered at the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials - REBEC, RBR-33YTQC. All patients read and signed the informed consent form before inclusion.

AB1173 INCIDENT CASES OF COVID-19 AND VACCINATION ADHERENCE IN A MULTICENTRIC COHORT OF INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS IN BRAZIL

Background

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a worldwide health crisis. Patients with inflammatory arthritis are at higher risk of hospitalization and death by COVID-19 due to comorbidities or immunosuppressive treatments. Vaccination is one the most important strategies to control the pandemic.

Objectives

To evaluate the incident cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multicentric cohort of inflammatory arthritis in Brazil.

Methods

BiobadaBrasil is a multicentric registry-based cohort study of Brazilian patients with rheumatic diseases starting their first bDMARD or tsDMARD (1). The present analysis is a retrospective evaluation of adult patients with inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis – RA, spondylarthritis -SpA and psoriatic arthritis-PsA) that were alive since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemics in Brazil in February 2020. We evaluated the incidence and severity of COVID-19 infection and the adherence to anti- SARS-CoV-2 vaccines schedules, up to January 2022.

Results

A total of 300 patients were interviewed and 69 (23.0%) reported confirmed anti-SARS-CoV infection and 5 (1.7%) had a second infection. Among known infected patients, 18.8% need hospitalization and oxygen support, 7.2% were admitted at ICU, and 5.8% died. After COVID-19 infection, 31.8% reported worsening of disease activity but only 6.1% had modification in medication due to disease activity. Distribution of cases followed the pattern of waves observed in Brazil (Figure 1). Regarding vaccination, 285 (95%) reported to have received at least one dose of any anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: 43% received the first with the adenovirus ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) adenovirus vaccine, 32% received the Sinovac-CoronaVac inactivated vaccine, 22% received the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNtech) mRNA vaccine and 3% received the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNtech) adenovirus vaccine. Almost all (98.1%) of these patients had already received the second dose of vaccine and after the first and second vaccine doses, 6% and 4% of patients, respectively, reported worsening of articular disease activity, while, after the third dose, no patient reported disease activity worsening.

Figure 1.

Conclusion

During the pandemics, patients with inflammatory arthritis had a pattern of distribution of cases very similar to general population. Adherence to vaccination is high and well tolerated.

References

[1]Bredemeier et al. J Rheumatol 2021;48:1519-27

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0650 THE IMPACT OF OLD AGE ON THE PERSISTENCE AND SAFETY OF TREATMENT WITH BIOLOGIC AGENTS OR JAK INHIBITORS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

The effect of age on persistence and safety of treatment with biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis has been a subject to research interest. Two recently published studies did not observe significantly different survival of treatment with bDMARDs among older age (≥ 65 years) individuals (1,2); incidence of serious adverse events was higher in these patients (2).

Objectives

to evaluate association of the age with treatment survival and overall safety among patients receiving one or multiple courses of bDMARDs or targeted synthetic (ts-) DMARDs.

Methods

BiobadaBrasil is a multicentric registry-based cohort study of Brazilian patients with rheumatic diseases starting their first bDMARD or tsDMARD (3). The present analysis includes RA patients recruited from Jan 2009 to Oct 2019, followed-up over one or multiple (up to six) courses of treatment necessarily involving a bDMARD or tsDMARD (latest date, Nov 19, 2019). Treatment course is defined as a period during which the medication scheme does not change, except for dose adjustments. Primary outcome was the incidence treatment interruption for any reason (except for pregnancy or disease remission), while interruption due to adverse events (AEs; including death) and due to inefficacy served as secondary outcomes. Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) also served as a secondary outcome. Extended (frailty) multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and negative binomial regression with generalized estimating equations (to calculate incidence rate ratios [IRRs]) were used for statistical analyses (both types of analyses including time-varying covariates over multiple courses of treatment).

Results

In total, 1316 patients (2335 treatment courses, 6508 patient-years [PY]) were enrolled. Of these, 160 patients (643 PY; 237 treatment courses) were ≥ 65 years old, mean age at starting treatment = 71 ± 5 yrs (84% female). Old age was not significantly associated with treatment interruption for any reason, but presented higher risk of interruption due to adverse events (after multivariate adjustment) and lower risk of stopping because of inefficacy (see Table 1). Older patients presented higher incidence of SAEs than younger ones (16.0 vs 8.4/100 PY, respectively; multivariate IRR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.80, P<0.001). Among old patients, tocilizumab (HR: 2.73, 95% CI: 1.13 to 6.64, P=0.026), etanercept (2.13, 1.12 to 4.07, P=0.022), and infliximab (2.39, 1.19 to 4.79, P=0.014) presented higher risk of treatment termination as compared with adalimumab. In this subgroup (age ≥65 yrs), there was no significant difference in the risk of SAEs between different bDMARDs/tsDMARDs.

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) of interruption of treatment course comparing older (≥65 years) versus younger patients (reference category). Results are HRs, 95% CIs, and P values.

Cause of interruption (n of events)Crude analysisAdjusted covariates*Interruption - any reason (1321)0.96 (0.75 to 1.23), P=0.7601.09 (0.82 to 1.43), P=0.550Interruption - adverse events (368)1.33 (0.75 to 0.89), P=0.1601.59 (1.07 to 2.35), P=0.020Interruption - inefficacy (680)0.56 (0.39 to 0.80), P=0.0020.57 (0.38 to 0.87), P=0.009

* Age, baseline DAS28, disease duration, gender, smoking, RF or anti-CCP, previous malignancy, interstitial lung disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, renal failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy, COPD, heart failure, concomitant use of each cs-, b-, and tsDMARDs, corticosteroids, starting year, osteoporosis, hepatitis B,C, treatment sequence.

Conclusion

The overall risk of treatment interruption with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs is not higher in older patients. Higher risk of interruption due to AE was balanced by a lower risk of stopping treatment due to inefficacy. Older patients had a higher incidence of SAEs.

References

[1]Mathieu et al. Rheumatol Int 2021;41:879-85.

[2]Freitas et al. Drugs Aging 2020;37:899-907.

[3]Bredemeier et al. J Rheumatol 2021;48:1519-27.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0242 THE EFFECT OF ANTIMALARIALS ON THE OVERALL SAFETY AND PERSISTENCE OF TREATMENT WITH BIOLOGIC AGENTS OR JAK INHIBITORS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background

Antimalarials (AM) are frequently part of the initial scheme of conventional synthetic DMARDs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and have been associated with lower incidence of diabetes and better lipid profile in these patients (1). However, the role of AM in schemes involving biologic (b-) or targeted synthetic (ts-) DMARDs has been much less extensively studied. In addition, a recent large scale study (2) and a consensus article (1) casted doubt on the long-term cardiovascular safety of AM.

Objectives

To evaluate the association of concomitant use of AM with the overall safety and survival of

treatment course among patients receiving one or multiple courses of bDMARDs or tsDMARDs

Methods

BiobadaBrasil is a multicentric registry-based cohort study of Brazilian patients with rheumatic diseases starting their first bDMARD or tsDMARD (3). The present analysis includes RA patients recruited from Jan 2009 to Oct 2019, followed-up over one or multiple (up to six) courses of treatment (latest date, Nov 19, 2019). A treatment course is defined as a period during which the medication scheme does not change. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). Total and system-specific adverse events (AEs), treatment interruption for any reason, interruption due to AEs and due to inefficacy served as secondary outcomes. Negative binomial regression with generalized estimating equations (to calculate the incidence rate ratios [ÌRRs]) and extended (frailty) Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analyses (both types of analyses including time-varying covariates over multiple courses of treatment).

Results

In total, 1316 patients (2335 treatment courses, 6711 patient-years [PY]) were enrolled. The overall incidence of serious adverse events was 9.2/100 PY. AM were used over 354 courses (1254.5 PY) of therapy. The IRRs for the primary and secondary outcomes are presented in Table 1. AM were also associated with better treatment course survival (Figure 1), reducing the risk of interruption due to AEs (multivariate hazard ratio: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.81, P=0.002) and inefficacy (0.65, 0.48 to 0.87, P=0.003).

Figure 1.Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of adverse events comparing use versus non-use (reference category) of antimalarials. Results are IRRs, 95% CIs, and P values.

Type of adverse event (n of events)Crude analysisAdjusted covariates*Serious adverse events (617)0.60 (0.41 to 0.87), P=0.0070.51 (0.37 to 0.69), P<0.001Any adverse event (3494)0.65 (0.54 to 0.77), P<0.0010.68 (0.57 to 0.81), P<0.001Cardiovascular‡Serious (52)1.04 (0.49 to 2.20), P=0.9241.06 (0.45 to 2.50), P=0.891Total (163)0.90 (0.59 to 1.38), P=0.6420.93 (0.59 to 1.45), P=0.737InfectionsSerious (277)0.78 (0.44 to 1.39), P=0.4040.53 (0.34 to 0.83), P=0.006Total (1400)0.77 (0.61 to 0.98), P=0.0330.75 (0.60 to 0.94), P=0.014Hepatic‡Total (66)0.20 (0.07 to 0.64), P=0.0070.16 (0.04 to 0.57), P=0.005Glicemic control-relatedTotal (34)0.74 (0.29 to 1.92), P=0.5400.73 (0.26 to 2.00), P=0.535DyslipidemiaTotal (83)0.60 (0.31 to 1.13), P=0.1140.55 (0.28 to 1.06), P=0.074

*Age, baseline DAS28, disease duration, gender, smoking, seropositivity (RF or anti-CCP), previous malignancy, interstitial lung disease, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, renal failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy, COPD, heart failure, concomitant use of each cs-, b-, and tsDMARDs, corticosteroids, starting year, osteoporosis, hepatitis B and C, and treatment sequence. ‡ Excluding infections.

Conclusion

Among RA patients on treatment with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs, concomitant use of antimalarials reduced the incidence of serious and total AEs, including infections and hepatic AEs, and prolonged treatment course survival. No significant increase in the risk of cardiovascular AEs was observed.

References

[1]Desmarais et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2021;73:2151-60.

[2]Lane et al. Lancet Rheumatol 2020;2:e698–e711

[3]Bredemeier et al. J Rheumatol 2021;48:1519-27.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0676 SURVIVAL OF THE FIRST COURSE OF BIOLOGIC OR JAK INHIBITOR IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: ASSOCIATION WITH THE CHOICE OF AGENT AND CONCOMITANT CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DMARDS

Background:

After failure of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment may be escalated to biologic (bDMARDs) or JAK inhibitors (JAKi) (1). Analysis of drug survival can provide useful information on the effectiveness of these therapeutic schemes.

Objectives:

to evaluate the association of the choice of therapeutic agent with the survival of treatment course in RA patients receiving their first bDMARD or JAKi.

Methods:

BiobadaBrasil is a multicentric registry-based cohort study of Brazilian patients starting their first bDMARD/JAKi (2). This analysis includes RA patients recruited from Jan 2009 to Oct 2019, followed-up over the first course of treatment with a bDMARD/JAKi until censoring (latest date, Nov 19, 2019) or occurrence of the outcome of interest. A treatment course is defined as a period during which the medication scheme does not change, except for dose adjustments. The primary outcome was the interruption of treatment course for any reason (except for pregnancy or disease remission); interruption of treatment due to adverse events (AEs) or death and due to inefficacy served as secondary outcomes. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for analyses.

Results:

In total, 1177 patients (3800 patient-years [PY]) were enrolled. The overall incidence of treatment interruption was 17.5/100 PY. Adalimumab was the most frequently prescribed agent, followed by infliximab (n= 267). The hazards ratios (HR) of the primary and secondary outcomes are presented in Table 1. Figure 1 compares the survival of treatment curves of different bDMARDs/JAKi.

Table 1.

Hazard ratios (HR) of interruption of therapy course of each therapeutic agent (the reference category for bDMARDs/ JAKi is infliximab). Results are HR, 95% CIs, and P values*.

Agent (number of patients)Interruption for any reason (665 events)Interruption due to adverse events or death (196 events)Interruption due to inefficacy (319 events)Adalimumab (354)0.83 (0.68 to 1.01), P= 0.0620.68 (0.48 to 0.96), P=0.0291.08 (0.80 to 1.44), P=0.621Etanercept (257)0.81 (0.66 to 1.01), P=0.0630.56 (0.37 to 0.83), P=0.0040.93 (0.68 to 1.29), P=0.674Certolizumab (80)0.74 (0.47 to 1.16), P=0.1850.33 (0.13 to 0.86), P=0.0241.32 (0.74 to 2.35), P=0.350Golimumab (53)0.86 (0.53 to 1.38), P=0.5300.46 (0.18 to 1.19), P=0.1111.07 (0.53 to 2.15), P=0.849JAKi (tofacitinib) (59)0.54 (0.30 to 0.99), P=0.0470.19 (0.04 to 0.82), P=0.0260.89 (0.41 to 1.96), P=0.779Rituximab (48)0.87 (0.55 to 1.37), P=0.5400.48 (0.20 to 1.18), P=0.1090.58 (0.26 to 1.34), P=0.205Abatacept (30)0.52 (0.25 to 1.07), P=0.0770.46 (0.14 to 1.56), P=0.2150.46 (0.14 to 1.52), P=0.203Tocilizumab (29)0.29 (0.14 to 0.63), P=0.0020.40 (0.12 to 1.30), P=0.1260.28 (0.09 to 0.90), P=0.033Methotrexate (792)0.95 (0.79 to 1.14), P=0.5610.86 (0.62 to 1.19), P=0.3620.98 (0.75 to 1.28), P=0.860Leflunomide (497)1.17 (0.99 to 1.39), P=0.0611.44 (1.06 to 1.96), P=0.0201.02 (0.80 to 1.30), P=0.856Sulfasalazine (48)1.18 (0.80 to 1.75), P=0.4011.94 (1.07 to 3.54), P=0.0300.85 (0.45 to 1.59), P=0.605Antimalarials (230)0.80 (0.65 to 0.98), P=0.0270.67 (0.45 to 0.99), P=0.0430.67 (0.50 to 0.92), P=0.011

* All tests adjusted for other variables presented in the table and for age, baseline DAS28, disease duration, gender, smoking, seropositivity (RF/anti-CCP), previous malignancy, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, renal failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy, COPD, heart failure, use of corticosteroids, starting year, hypercholesterolemia, osteoporosis, hepatitis B and C.

Conclusion:

In our study, infliximab was related to an overall higher hazard of treatment course interruption than tolicizumab and tofacitinib, and higher hazard of interruption due to AEs than most other anti-TNF agents and tofacitinib. Maintaining antimalarials in patients receiving advanced therapies for RA may reduce interruption of treatment due to inefficacy and AEs.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared