Bovine pericardial bioprosthesis in mitral position. A ten-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The pericardial bovine prosthesis Pericarbon should offer some advantages in comparison with the former generations, because its development is focused on solving previous problems and resulted in the variation of the pericardial fixation method, of valve structure and of stent coating. This hypothesis was evaluated through a retrospective follow-up.

METHODS

Between 1985 and 1989, 78 Pericarbon prostheses O 29 were implanted in mitral position by the same surgeon. All patients received warfarin for the first three months to maintain an International Normalized Ratio between 2.5 and 3.5; after which they received antiaggregant therapy indefinitely. With an average follow-up period of 7.34 years for a total of 573 patient-years, we evaluated perioperative and late mortality, late morbidity (thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events, reoperations, primary tissue failures, endocarditic events) and patient clinical conditions.

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality was 1.28% (1/78), late mortality was 11.6% (9/77) with 5 valve-related deaths. 5-year survival was 93% and 10-year survival 97%. Fifteen patients required reoperation for prosthetic replacement, fourteen for primary tissue failure. There were ten minor thromboembolic events, one major event, one haemorrhage and one prosthetic endocarditis (the last two with patient exitus). After 10 years (75% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I-II.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides the known better haemodynamic performance, Pericarbon bioprosthesis seems to present a survival and redofreedom curve comparable to the best porcine prosthesis, with less incidence of endocarditis, thromboembolic events and prosthesis leakage.

Ex vivo culture of peripheral blood CD34+ cells: effects of hematopoietic growth factors on production of neutrophilic precursors

A major potential application for ex vivo culture of hematopoietic progenitor cells is the treatment of cytopenia following high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic transplantation. We have previously postulated that infusion of a sufficient number of neutrophil postprogenitor cells generated by ex vivo culture of CD34+ cells may be able to abrogate neutropenia. In this article, we describe further development of an efficient stromal-free, cytokine-dependent, static culture system for generation of these cells. Our previous studies indicated that maximal production of nucleated cells and myeloid progenitor cells from PB CD34+ cells occurred with multiple hematopoietic growth factor (HGF), notably the 6-HGF combination of interleukin (IL)-1, IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF), and stem cell factor (SCF). In the present study, we determine the contribution of each of these 6 HGF in generation of neutrophilic precursors. SCF, G-CSF, and IL-3 were found to be the most important HGF for production of neutrophilic cells. The 4-HGF combination of IL-3, IL-6, G-CSF, and SCF was optimized by performing dose-response experiments and shown to be as potent as 6 HGF for production of nascent CFU-GM and neutrophilic precursors.

Ex vivo hematopoietic progenitor cell expansion

The ability to culture and expand hematopoietic progenitor cells ex vivo has major implications for both bone marrow and stem cell support following marrow ablative or subablative high-dose therapy and for improving the efficiency of retroviral transfection in gene marking and gene therapy. This review focuses on methods for the generation of myeloid progenitor and post-progenitor cells from peripheral blood stem cell collections, with particular emphasis on the characterization of these cells and practical issues associated with their expansion.

A comparative study of the phenotype and proliferative capacity of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells mobilized by four different protocols and those of steady-phase PB and bone marrow CD34+ cells

Peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells from four commonly used mobilization protocols were studied to compare their phenotype and proliferative capacity with steady-state PB or bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells. Mobilized PB CD34+ cells were collected during hematopoietic recovery after myelosuppressive chemotherapy with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or during G-CSF administration alone. The expression of activation and lineage-associated markers and c-kit gene product were studied by flow cytometry. Proliferative capacity was measured by generation of nascent myeloid progenitor cells (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; CFU-GM) and nucleated cells in a stroma-free liquid culture stimulated by a combination of six hematopoietic growth factors (interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-3, IL-6, GM-CSF, G-CSF, and stem cell factor). G-CSF-mobilized CD34+ cells have the highest percentage of CD38- cells (P < .0081), but otherwise, CD34+ cells from different mobilization protocols were similar to one another in their phenotype and proliferative capacity. The spectrum of primitive and mature myeloid progenitors in mobilized PB CD34+ cells was similar to their steady-state counterparts, but the percentages of CD34+ cells expressing CD10 or CD19 were lower (P < .0028). Although steady-state PB and chemotherapy-mobilized CD34+ cells generated fewer CFU-GM at day 21 than G-CSF-mobilized and steady-state BM CD34+ cells (P < .0449), the generation of nucleated cells and CFU-GM were otherwise comparable. The presence of increased or comparable numbers of hematopoietic progenitors within PB collections with equivalent proliferative capacity to BM CD34+ cells is not unexpected given the rapid and complete hematopoietic reconstitution observed with mobilized PB. However, all four types of mobilized PB CD34+ cells are different from steady-state BM CD34+ cells in that they express less c-kit (P < .0002) and CD71 (P < .04) and retain less rhodamine 123 (P < .0001). These observations are novel and suggest that different mobilization protocols may act via similar pathways involving the down-regulation of c-kit and may be independent of cell-cycle status.

Collection efficiency on the Fenwal CS3000 when using filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) as a peripheral blood stem cell mobilization agent

The collection efficiency (CE) of the Fenwal CS3000 in collecting peripheral blood stem cells during post-chemotherapy recovery phase ranges from 58% to 73%. Recently filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) has also been shown to be effective as a mobilization agent although mobilization occurs during elevated and not low normal leukocyte counts. We compared the mononuclear cell (MNC) CE and the myeloid progenitor cell (CFU-GM) CE among 11 patients with G-CSF mobilization (33 procedures) and 19 patients during recovery following myelosuppression chemotherapy (93 procedures). Pre-apheresis leukocyte, neutrophil, MNC, and PB CFU-GM counts were significantly higher in the G-CSF group, while the granulocyte percentage in the apheresis products was similar in both groups. Both MNC CE (81.8 +/- 4.5% vs. 64 +/- 2.4%) and CFU-GM CE (79.5 +/- 10.5% vs. 55.8 +/- 3.5%) were higher in the G-CSF group. Only the pre-apheresis MNC count showed an independently significant correlation for both CE (P < .001). The higher CE in the G-CSF group can only be partly explained by a rise in MNC count during apheresis. These data suggest that the blood cell separator works better with leukocytosis, and especially with a higher MNC count. The improvement in CE is another benefit of G-CSF mobilization over chemotherapy mobilization.