[Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy in the treatment of Meibomian gland dysfunction-related severe dry eye]

INTRODUCTION

Dry eye syndrome caused by Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a common disease in the general population and impairs quality of life. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) has mainly been used in dermatology for the treatment of skin disorders, and more recently for MGD-related dry eye. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of IPL with the E-Eye® device (E-Swin, Houdan, France) in severe MGD-related dry eye patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This non-comparative study included 20 patients with MGD-related dry eye with a Break-Up Time (BUT)<10seconds, dry eye symptoms >30mm on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and failure of lid hygiene and artificial tears. Treatment consisted of 3 sessions of IPL on D0, D15, and D45 (5 flashes of 13J/cm² per eye). The following parameters were assessed at each visit and at D75 : symptoms graded with a VAS and the Standard Patient Assessment of Eye Dryness questionnaire (SPEED), BUT, corneal fluorescein staining, Meibomian gland expression score, meibography, tear film lipid layer thickness by interferometry and the ocular scattering index by double-pass aberrometry (OQAS). Statistical analysis was performed on the eye most affected at baseline.

RESULTS

We included 40 eyes of 20 patients, 15 female and 5 male, mean age 47±15 years (24 to 74 years). The symptoms rated by VAS were severe, averaging 69±25mm. After treatment, there was a statistically significant decrease in symptoms, with a 14mm VAS decrease (55±29mm at D75 versus 69mm at D0, P=0.048) and SPEED score of 3.4 (19.0±6mm versus 22.4±4.6, P=0.03). The number of expressible Meibomian gland ducts increased significantly (from 5.9 to 8.1, P=0.04), lid redness decreased (from 1.4 to 0.6, P=NS) and BUT improved (from 4.2 to 5.9, P=NS). Other parameters remained unchanged. Three patients (15%) complained of transient ocular burning after each treatment.

CONCLUSION

IPL appears to be effective in improving signs and symptoms in patients with severe MGD-related dry eye, with a good safety profile. Its exact mechanism of action remains to be elucidated.

[Demodex and ocular surface disease]

Demodex is a saprophytic mite of the ocular adnexa, which can in certain circumstances proliferate on the skin of the face and on the eyelid margins. It is involved in facial rosacea (especially in the papulopustular form) and in the development or aggravation of anterior and/or posterior blepharitis or even keratoconjunctivitis, often in association with cutaneous lesions ; the pathophysiology is often multifactorial. Symptoms are non-specific, but the presence of cylindrical sleeves on the eyelashes is very suggestive of infestation, and certain techniques of biomicroscopic examination or imaging, such as confocal microscopy in vivo, allow direct visualization of the parasite. Parasitological examination of the eyelashes can confirm the diagnosis and can be improved by good sampling technique. Eyelid hygiene and oil-based ointments are the cornerstone of treatment. New specific treatments, in particular topical treatments based on tea tree oil, ivermectin, as well as pulsed light therapy and micro-exfoliation of the eyelid margin, can help to reduce the parasitic load and improve symptoms.

Diagnostic tools in ocular allergy

Ocular allergy (OA) includes a group of common and less frequent hypersensitivity disorders frequently misdiagnosed and not properly managed. The diagnosis of OA is usually based on clinical history and signs and symptoms, with the support of in vivo and in vitro tests when identification of the specific allergen is required. To date, no specific test is available for the diagnosis of the whole spectrum of the different forms of OA. The lack of recommendations on diagnosis of OA is considered a medical need not only for allergists but also for ophthalmologists. This position paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the currently available tools for diagnosing OA to promote a common nomenclature and procedures to be used by different specialists. Questionnaires, sign and symptom grading scales, tests, and potential biomarkers for OA are reviewed. We also identified several unmet needs in the diagnostic tools to generate interest, increase understanding, and inspire further investigations. Tools, recommendations, and algorithms for the diagnosis of OA are proposed for use by both allergists and ophthalmologists. Several unmet needs in the diagnostic tools should be further improved by specific clinical research in OA.

Conjunctival allergen provocation test : guidelines for daily practice

Conjunctival allergen provocation test (CAPT) reproduces the events occurring by instilling an allergen on the ocular surface. This paper is the compilation of a task force focussed on practical aspects of this technique based on the analysis of 131 papers. Main mechanisms involved are reviewed. Indications are diagnosing the allergen(s)-triggering symptoms in IgE-mediated ocular allergy in seasonal, acute or perennial forms of allergic conjunctivitis, especially when the relevance of the allergen is not obvious or in polysensitized patients. Contraindications are limited to ongoing systemic severe pathology, asthma and eye diseases. CAPT should be delayed if receiving systemic steroids or antihistamines. Local treatment should be interrupted according to the half-life of each drug. Prerequisites are as follows: obtaining informed consent; evidencing of an allergen by skin prick tests and/or serum-specific IgE dosages; being able to deal with an unlikely event such as acute asthma exacerbation, urticaria or anaphylaxis, or an exacerbation of allergic conjunctivitis. Allergen extracts should be diluted locally prior to administration. Positive criteria are based on itching or quoted according to a composite score. An alternative scoring is based on itching. CAPT remains underused in daily practice, although it is a safe and simple procedure which can provide valuable clinical information.

Ocular allergy: recognizing and diagnosing hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface

Ocular allergy includes several clinically different conditions that can be considered as hypersensitivity disorders of the ocular surface. The classification of these conditions is complex, and their epidemiology has not been adequately studied because of the lack of unequivocal nomenclature. Ocular allergy symptoms are often, but not always, associated with other allergic manifestations, mostly rhinitis. However, specific ocular allergic diseases need to be recognized and managed by a team that includes both an ophthalmologist and an allergist. The diagnosis of ocular allergy is usually based on clinical history and signs and symptoms, with the support of in vivo and in vitro tests when the identification of the specific allergic sensitization is required for patient management. The aims of this Task Force Report are (i) to unify the nomenclature and classification of ocular allergy, by combining the ophthalmology and allergy Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma criteria; (ii) to describe current methods of diagnosis; (iii) to summarize the therapeutic options for the management of ocular allergic inflammation.

Aseptic meningitis and ischaemic stroke in Fabry disease

BACKGROUND

Fabry disease (OMIM 301 500) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disease. Neurological symptoms in Fabry disease mainly include stroke, acroparesthesia, cranial nerve palsies and autonomic dysfunction. We report on aseptic meningitis in Fabry patients.

METHODS

Clinical analysis, brain magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, treatment and outcome data were analysed in three cases of meningitis associated with Fabry disease.

FINDINGS

Mean age at meningitis onset was 26.6 (24-28) years. Headache was present in all cases and fever in two cases. Meningitis was always diagnosed before Fabry disease. A familial history of Fabry disease was present in two cases. Non-neurological symptoms caused by Fabry disease were present in all cases. All patients also suffered stroke and sensorineural hearing loss. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed pleocytosis (mean, 36; range: 8-76 cells/mm(3)) and a high protein level (mean, 63; range, 47-70 mg/dl). C-reactive protein blood levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were raised. Diagnosis was assessed by low alpha-galactosidase A dosage and/or gene mutation analysis in all cases. All patients were treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). In two cases, lumbar puncture was repeatedly performed and there was no normalisation of CSF under ERT alone, at 9 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. One patient who suffered intracranial hypertension was treated efficiently with steroids, associated with azathioprine. The fact that Fabry disease could be an auto-inflammatory disorder is discussed.

INTERPRETATION

Fabry disease may cause aseptic meningitis.

Prevalence of vernal keratoconjunctivitis: a rare disease?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of vernal keratoconjuntivitis (VKC) in Europe.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 3003 ophthalmologists from six countries (Finland, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden) representing 151.9 million inhabitants. Results were analysed per country, and VKC prevalence for the 15 European member states in 2002 was extrapolated. Six hypotheses were used: disease duration (4 or 8 years) combined with three prevalence hypotheses for non-responding ophthalmologists.

RESULTS

The response rate to the survey was 29.5%. The estimates of VKC prevalence in Western Europe (per 10,000 inhabitants) ranged from 1.16 to 10.55. The prevalence of VKC with corneal complications ranged from 0.30 to 2.26. The VKC prevalences per country were in the following ranges: Italy 2.4-27.8, Finland, 0.7-8.4, Sweden 1.2-8.7, The Netherlands 0.6-4.6, France 0.7-3.3 and Norway 0.3-1.9. VKC with corneal complications were: Italy 0.4-4.8, Sweden 0.3-2.4, Finland 0.2-2.8, The Netherlands 0.2-1.6, France 0.3-1.4 and Norway 0.1-1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the most likely hypotheses concerning disease duration and non-responding ophthalmologists' VKC case rate, the best estimate of VKC prevalence in Western Europe is 3.2/10,000 inhabitants. The prevalence of VKC with corneal complications is 0.8/10,000 inhabitants.

[Efficacy of topical 2% cyclosporine A as a steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent vernal keratoconjunctivitis]

INTRODUCTION

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is responsible for severe conjunctival and corneal inflammation that often requires topical steroids. Steroid dependency is not rare and can lead to unacceptable complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of 2% cyclosporine eye drops (CsA) as a steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent VKC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this noncomparative interventional case series, 18 steroid-dependent VKC patients (17 males, 1 female; mean age, 13 years old) received 2% CsA qid. Topical steroids were associated at decreasing dosage for 1 week and stopped if possible. Efficacy was graded at 1 and 3 months on symptoms, signs and steroid use. Local and systemic tolerability (cyclosporinemia, creatininemia) was also assessed.

RESULTS

After 1 month, inflammation was controlled without steroids in 11 cases (61%). Low-dose steroids were still necessary to control the disease in four cases (22%). In three cases (17%), the disease was not controlled despite high-dose steroids. At 3 months, results were similar. All patients whose inflammation was partially controlled or not controlled by CsA had active extraocular atopic diseases. Local and systemic tolerability was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical 2% cyclosporine is inconstantly effective in steroid-dependent VKC. However, this treatment allows for a partial or total reduction of steroids in most cases.