Defining a role for systemic chemotherapy in local and advanced appendix adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Appendix adenocarcinomas (AAs) are rare tumours that often present late, with a propensity for peritoneal metastases (PMs). This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of AA patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with curative intent and determine the role of systemic chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from a prospective database and classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification. Tumour clearance from CRS was described using a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score ranging from 0 [no residual disease (RD)] to 3 (>2.5 cm RD). Patients with CC0-2 CRS received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Systemic chemotherapy was categorised as 'prior' (>6 months before), 'neoadjuvant' (<6 months before), 'adjuvant' (<6 months after CC0-1 CRS) or 'palliative' (after CC2-3 CRS). Analyses used Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

Between January 2005 and August 2021, 216 AA patients were identified for inclusion. Median age was 59 years (21-81 years). CRS/HIPEC was carried out in 182 (84%) patients, of whom 164/182 (76%) had mitomycin C HIPEC. CC0-1 was achieved in 172 (80%) patients. Systemic chemotherapy was given to 97 (45%) patients from the whole cohort and to 37/46 (80%) patients with positive nodes. Median overall survival (OS) was 122 months (95% confidence interval 61-182 months). After multivariate analysis, patients with acellular and lower-grade PM had similar OS to those with localised (M0) disease (P = 0.59 and P = 0.19). For patients with positive nodes, systemic chemotherapy was associated with reduced risk of death compared to no chemotherapy (P < 0.0019).

CONCLUSION

This study identifies AA patients with positive lymph nodes derive the most benefit from systemic chemotherapy. We confirm the prognostic importance of stage and peritoneal grade, with excellent outcomes in patients with acellular mucin and lower-grade PM.

Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases

Background

The use of biomarkers to target anti-EGFR treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is well-established, requiring molecular analysis of primary or metastatic biopsies. We aim to review concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic sites.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies (1991–2018) reporting on biomarker concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic site(s) was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines using several medical databases. Studies without matched samples or using peripheral blood for biomarker analysis were excluded.

Findings

61 studies including 3565 patient samples were included. Median biomarker concordance for KRAS (n = 50) was 93.7% [[67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], NRAS (n = 11) was 100% [[90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], BRAF (n = 22) was 99.4% [[80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]], and PIK3CA (n = 17) was 93% [[42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [100]]. Meta-analytic pooled discordance was 8% for KRAS (95% CI = 5–10%), 8% for BRAF (95% CI = 5–10%), 7% for PIK3CA (95% CI = 2–13%), and 28% overall (95% CI = 14–44%). The liver was the most commonly biopsied metastatic site (n = 2276), followed by lung (n = 438), lymph nodes (n = 1123), and peritoneum (n = 132). Median absolute concordance in multiple biomarkers was 81% (5–95%).

Interpretation

Metastatic CRC demonstrates high concordance across multiple biomarkers, suggesting that molecular testing of either the primary or liver and lung metastasis is adequate. More research on colorectal peritoneal metastases is required.

Abstract P1-14-06: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres and FOLFOX/5FU chemotherapy in pre-treated breast cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective analysis of response rates, times to progression and survival of patients treated in Manchester UK between 2010 and 2016

Background:

SIRT is a globally licensed technique of Radio-Embolization (RE) of hepatic tumors via intra-arterial infusion of β-particle emitting Yttrium-90 (Y-90) radio-labelled microspheres. It increases response rates and hepatic time to progression in metastatic colorectal cancer when used in combination with 5FU/Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) chemotherapy with acceptable toxicity profile. FOLFOX gives a radio-sensitizing effect and also controls disease outside the liver. Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) patients often have extra-hepatic disease and respond to multiple lines of systemic therapy and SIRT is infrequently used.

Methods and patients

Between 2010 and 2016 we treated 25 BCLM patients with Y-90 SIRT.

Receptor status: 20 ER+ve/HER-2 -ve, 3 ER-ve/HER-2 +ve, 2 triple -ve.

Eleven patients had liver only disease with 14 also having known extra-hepatic disease. Average number of previous lines of therapy in metastatic setting: chemotherapy = 2.4; endocrine = 1. Sixty-four % patients had prior Capecitabine (n=16); 12% platinum (n=3, all Carboplatin). Twenty patients received chemotherapy with SIRT: 17 had modified FOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin/bolus 5FU day1, infusional 5FU day 1-3 (46 hrs); 3 patients had Modified de Gramont style 5FU alone. Five patients had no chemotherapy.

Sir-spheres were inserted on day 2 of FOLFOX with the 5FU infusion pump continuing to day 3. Further 2-weekly FOLFOX chemo cycles were at clinician's discretion: average number delivered 3.8. Four patients had the liver treated in two halves, approximately 6 weeks apart. One patient received SIRT only to half the liver. Patients were imaged with PET-CT/CT before and 2-3 months after SIRT. Retrospective case note review was performed and data correlated to evaluate tumor response (RR); hepatic and extra hepatic progression free survival (HPFS and EHPFS) and overall survival (OS). Accurate toxicity data was not recorded.

Results

Hepatic CT response rates: PR 56% (n=14), SD 28% (n=7) and PD 16% (n=4). Hepatic PET response rates: CR 32% (n=8), PR 40% (n=10), SD 12% (n=3), PD 16%(n=4). (Overall PET liver disease control rate = 84%).

Eight patients (32%) had extra-hepatic PD at first assessment. Of them, 4 had PR, 2 SD and 2 PD in the liver at that assessment. Two HER-2 +ve patients had brain metastases as first sign of PD within 75 days, an area not previously screened. Of 16 pre-treated with Capecitabine, liver CT response rates: 62.5% PR, 18.75% SD (n=10,3). Post SIRT/FOLFOX, average number of therapy lines: 2 for chemo and 0.75 for endocrine, with 8 patients still alive at time of censoring.

Median OS: 766 HPFS: 210 days (CI 140-286). Median EHPFS in patients with extra-hepatic disease: 152 days (CI 96-636).

Conclusions

SIRT with FOLFOX in previously treated BCLM patients produces high response rates, excellent tumor control and time to progression in the liver with good overall survival. It does not seem to decrease the ability to give further lines of chemotherapy and can be considered as an option for breast cancer patients with liver metastases.

Citation Format: Wilson G, Mullamitha S, Bentley D, Bell J, Mullan D, Carter L, Chittalia A, Howell S, Laasch H-U, Westwood T, Jeans S, Tipping J, Ryder D, Farquharson F, Arumugam P, Sheen A, Rajashanker B, Armstrong A, Misra V, Manoharan P, Lawrance J. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres and FOLFOX/5FU chemotherapy in pre-treated breast cancer patients with liver metastases: A retrospective analysis of response rates, times to progression and survival of patients treated in Manchester UK between 2010 and 2016 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-06.

Phase I evaluation of CDP791, a PEGylated di-Fab' conjugate that binds vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2

PURPOSE

Specific blocking of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2) is a novel therapeutic approach. Here, we report the first phase I clinical trial evaluation of CDP791, a PEGylated di-Fab' conjugate that binds VEGFR-2.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Cohorts of patients received CDP791 at doses between 0.3 and 30 mg/kg every 3 weeks for the initial two doses.

RESULTS

The compound was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity. Dose-related hypertension was observed in patients receiving CDP791 10 mg/kg or more and several patients on the higher doses developed infusion-related cutaneous hemangiomata arising 28 to 106 days after the first drug administration and resolving 3 weeks after cessation. Biopsy and histologic evaluation showed that CDP791-bound VEGFR-2 is non-phosphorylated, suggesting that the drug is biologically active. Concentrations of CDP791 considered biologically relevant were sustained for 3 weeks when doses of 10 mg/kg or more were administered. Although no reductions in vascular permeability were recorded using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), there was a significant dose level-related reduction in tumor growth. While challenging the recent dogma that active VEGF inhibitors should modulate DCE-MRI measurements of vascular permeability, this highlights the potential of serial three-dimensional tumor measurements to detect tumor growth arrest. Twelve patients received drug for more than two treatments, although no partial or complete responses were seen.

CONCLUSION

The data show that CDP791 is biologically active and well tolerated, achieving appropriate plasma concentrations when administered at 10 mg/kg or more every 3 weeks.

Phase I and DCE-MRI evaluation of CDP791, a di-Fab PEG conjugate that inhibits VEGFR2

3523

Background: VEGF inhibitors are of proven clinical value. However, very few drugs specifically inhibit VEGFR2. CDP791 is a di-Fab PEG conjugate that binds VEGFR2 with a Kd of 49pM. Methods: We performed a single site, open label, dose-escalation study of CDP791. Cohorts of patients received between 0.3 and 30 mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression. DCE-MRI was performed at each dose level. Results: Thirty-one patients with colorectal, ovarian or renal cancer or other tumors were treated. There was no observed dose limiting toxicity or maximum tolerated dose. At doses of 10mg/kg or above, 7/16 patients developed cutaneous hemangiomata that regressed upon drug withdrawal. Biopsy of these confirmed that CDP791 was co-located with unphosphorylated VEGFR2. DCE-MRI revealed a dose- dependent inhibition of tumor growth over 20 days post-treatment, although there was no measurable change in Ktrans, an indicator of blood flow and capillary permeability. Fourteen patients received extended treatment and 5 (with renal (x2), colorectal, endometrial cancer and melanoma) had stable disease after 6 cycles. Plasma concentrations of CDP791 >10mcg/mL were sustained across the 21-day cycle for doses 10mg/kg and above. Conclusions: CDP791 is a pure VEGFR2 antagonist that is well tolerated up to doses of 30mg/kg. The drug is mechanistically active, associated with hemangiomata and dose-level dependent inhibition of tumor growth but not with reduction in vascular permeability or blood flow on DCE-MRI. These data imply that the drug is active in patients but challenge our understanding of the regulation of tumor vascular permeability. In addition, they suggest that serial 3-dimensional measurements of short-term tumor growth patterns are a sensitive method to detect biological therapy-related tumor growth inhibition.

[Table: see text]

The neoadjuvant approach in the treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

AIMS

Ovarian cancer has a very poor prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of 5-20% for advanced-stage disease. This work was designed to verify whether the neoadjuvant approach had an effect on survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III or IV disease who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (group 1) were compared with a group of conventionally treated patients (group 2).

RESULTS

Most of the patients in group 1 (76%) had partial tumoral responses after chemotherapy. Patients from group 1 (n = 42) had a median survival that was not different from that in patients from group 2 (n = 348). Patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy with taxanes had the same survival of patients who received no taxanes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed similar responses and survival rates for patients with stage III or IV ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, when compared with patients who underwent primary suboptimal cytoreductive surgery. Our data therefore support the ongoing trials to determine the optimum timing of surgery for ovarian cancer.

Randomized phase III study of carboplatin and paclitaxel versus vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in intermediate and poor prognosis small cell lung cancer: Preliminary results

7059

Background: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has been found to be effective in lung cancer and well tolerated. Method: This is a phase III randomized trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) versus vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (CAV) chemotherapy in limited or extensive stage disease patients but with a prognostic score in the intermediate or poor prognosis range.The aim of the study is to determine the one year survival rate, the objective response rate and toxicity. Patients were randomized to: four cycles of PC (paclitaxel 200mg/m2 by IV 3 hour infusion), followed by carboplatin (AUC of 6) by IV injection, 3-weekly or four cycles of CAV (cyclophosphamide 750mg/ m2, doxorubicin 40mg/ m2, vincristine 1.3mg/ m2 by IV injection) every 3-weeks. Thoracic radiotherapy was considered for appropriate patients. Results: 219 patients (110 for CAV and 109 for PC) patients were randomized. Pre-treatment characteristics were well balanced for stage, performance status, and age. There was significantly more grade 3/4 neutropenia in the CAV arm than the PC arm, 67% vs 38% (p < 0.005), whereas the PC arm, had more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (19% versus 8% p = 0.012). The PC arm had more grade 2 and 3 neuropathy. 56% grade 3 and 4 infections were observed on CAV arm and 35% on the PC arm (p < 0.005). Hospitalization required for severe neutropenia and infections was less with PC, compared to CAV (146 days for IV antibiotics compared to 308 days for CAV, p < 0.005). Response rates for CAV and PC were 59% and 61% respectively. One-year survival rates for the CAV arm was 6% and 13% for the PC arm. The intention to treat analysis concluded that there is statistical difference on the overall survival time in favor of PC (P = 0.014). Median survival was 94 days (CAV) and 154 (PC). Conclusions: CAV chemotherapy in SCLC patients is associated with higher risk of neutropenic sepsis than taxane based PC chemotherapy with no significant difference on the response rate. The overall survival was better for the PC arm. Final results will follow.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The interval from surgery to chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To study the effect of the interval between surgery and the start of chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We stratified patients according to the start of platinum-based chemotherapy in group 1 (within 4 weeks from surgery), group 2 (between 4 and 8 weeks) and group 3 (between 8 and 12 weeks).

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninty-four stage III ovarian cancer patients were analysed. In the multivariate analysis there were no differences in survival according to the interval between surgery and chemotherapy among the three groups. The independent prognostic variables were type of procedure (p = 0.014), performance status (p = 0.040) and post-chemotherapy CA-125 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The interval between surgery and chemotherapy does not affect outcome.

Phase II trial of tamoxifen and goserelin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Endocrine therapy is a recognised option in the treatment of chemo-resistant ovarian cancer. We conducted a nonrandomised phase II evaluation of combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer that had recurred following chemotherapy. In total, 26 patients entered the study, of which 17 had platinum-resistant disease. The median age was 63 years and enrolled patients had received a median of three chemotherapy regimens prior to trial entry. Patients were given oral tamoxifen 20 mg twice daily on a continuous basis and subcutaneous goserelin 3.6 mg once a month until disease progression. Using the definition of endocrine response that included patients with stable disease (SD) of 6 months or greater, the overall response rate (clinical benefit rate) was 50%. This included one complete response (CR) (3.8%), two partial responses (PR) (7.7%) and 10 patients with SD (38.5%). The median progression-free interval (PFI) was 4 months (95% CI 2.4–9.6) while the median overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 5.5–30.6). Four patients received treatment for more than 2 years (range 1–31) and one of them is still on treatment. In none of the four patients was there any evidence of recurrent or cumulative treatment related toxicity. Treatment-limiting toxicity was not seen in any of the study population. Endocrine data demonstrated a marked suppression of luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to less than 4% of baseline values. No consistent correlation could be established between LH/FSH suppression and tumour response. Likewise no relationship was observed between Inhibin A/B and pro-alpha C levels and tumour response. Inhibin is unlikely to be a useful surrogate marker for response in locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer. Combination endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin is an active regimen in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. Hormonal therapy is advantageous in its relative lack of toxicity, ease of administration and tolerability, thus making it suitable for patients with heavily pretreated disease, compromised bone marrow function and other comorbid conditions that contraindicate cytotoxic therapy as well as in patients with indolent disease.

Blockade of platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta by CDP860, a humanized, PEGylated di-Fab', leads to fluid accumulation and is associated with increased tumor vascularized volume

PURPOSE

CDP860 is an engineered Fab' fragment-polyethylene glycol conjugate, which binds to and blocks the activity of the beta-subunit of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR-beta). Studies in animals have suggested that PDGFR-beta inhibition reduces tumor interstitial fluid pressure, and thus increases the uptake of concomitantly administered drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether changes in tumor vascular parameters could be detected in humans, and to assess whether CDP860 would be likely to increase the uptake of a concurrently administered small molecule in future studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced ovarian or colorectal cancer and good performance status received intravenous infusions of CDP860 on days 0 and 28. Patients had serial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging studies to measure changes in tumor vascular parameters.

RESULTS

Three of eight patients developed significant ascites, and seven of eight showed evidence of fluid retention. In some patients, the ratio of vascular volume to total tumor volume increased significantly (P < .001) within 24 hours following CDP860 administration, an effect suggestive of recruitment of previously non-functioning vessels.

CONCLUSION

These observations suggest that inhibition of PDGFR-beta might improve delivery of a concurrently administered therapy. However, in cancer patients, further exploration of the dosing regimen of CDP860 is required to dissociate adverse effects from beneficial effects. The findings challenge the view that inhibition of PDGF alone is beneficial, and confirm that effects of PDGFR kinase inhibition mediate, to some extent, the fluid retention observed in patients treated with mixed tyrosine kinase inhibitors.