Optimized Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Anti-PEG Antibody Detection in Healthy Donors and Patients Treated with PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin

There is considerable interest in quantifying anti-PEG antibodies, given their potential involvement in accelerated clearance, complement activation, neutralization, and acute reactions associated with drug delivery systems. Published and commercially available anti-PEG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) differ significantly in terms of reagents and conditions, which could be confusing to users who want to perform in-house measurements. Here, we optimize the ELISA protocol for specific detection of anti-PEG IgG and IgM in sera from healthy donors and in plasma from cancer patients administered with PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin. The criterion of specificity is the ability of free PEG or PEGylated liposomes to inhibit the ELISA signals. We found that coating high-binding plates with monoamine methoxy-PEG5000, as opposed to bovine serum albumin-PEG20000, and blocking with 1% milk, as opposed to albumin or lysozyme, significantly improve the specificity, with over 95% of the signal being blocked by competition. Despite inherent between-assay variability, setting the cutoff value of the optical density at the 80th percentile consistently identified the same subjects. Using the optimized assay, we longitudinally measured levels of anti-PEG IgG/IgM in cancer patients before and after the PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy cycle (1 month apart, three cycles total). Antibody titers did not show any increase but rather a decrease between treatment cycles, and up to 90% of antibodies was bound to the infused drug. This report is a step toward harmonizing anti-PEG assays in human subjects, emphasizing the cost-effectiveness and optimized specificity.

Exploring tisotumab vedotin in recurrent cervical cancer: A case series including an HPV-independent gastric type adenocarcinoma

Metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer is difficult to treat with limited options following platinum-based chemotherapy. Tisotumab vedotin (TV) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) targeted at a tissue factor (TF), which is a cell surface protein that is upregulated in the majority of cervical cancers. Prior clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of TV in metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer with an objective response rate of 24-26 % with an 8.3 month duration of response. In this case series, we present 3 patients with recurrent or progressive cervical cancer of three different histologies (squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, and human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent gastric type carcinomas). We demonstrate a 100 % complete response rate with average time of complete response of 4.33 months. The duration of response was not reached as none of our patients had a confirmed progression at the time of writing this manuscript, but the mean time since the initiation of treatment was 6.1 months. In concordance with the clinical trials, our patients tolerated TV well although the grade 3 ocular toxicities were higher in our patients compared to prior data. This case series presents data confirming the efficacy and tolerability of TV in patients with recurrent cervical cancer, including an HPV-independent gastric type cervical cancer.

Mixed clear cell/endometrioid and clear cell/serous carcinoma of the uterus are clinicopathologically similar to pure clear cell carcinoma: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-210) study of 311 women

OBJECTIVES

Clear cell carcinoma is a high-risk subtype of endometrial cancer. Some patients have a mixture of clear cell carcinoma with other histologic types (endometrioid or serous) or cannot be neatly assigned to one of these types. Protocol GOG-8032 within GOG-210 was designed to determine whether these tumors differ from pure clear cell carcinoma in stage at diagnosis, initial pattern of spread, or patient survival.

METHODS

The term "mixed" was applied to tumors with multiple identifiable components, and "indeterminate" was applied to tumors with features intermediate between different histologic types. Three hundred eleven women with pure, mixed, or indeterminate clear cell carcinoma were identified in a larger cohort of patients undergoing hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in GOG-210. Histologic slides were centrally reviewed by expert pathologists. Baseline and follow-up data were analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-six patients had pure clear cell carcinoma and 175 had a mixed or indeterminate clear cell pattern. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics were similar except for a small difference in age at presentation. Univariate survival analysis confirmed the significance of typical endometrial cancer prognostic factors. Patients in the mixed categories had disease-free and overall survival similar to pure clear cell carcinoma, but the indeterminate clear cell/endometrioid group had longer survival.

CONCLUSION

In clear cell endometrial cancer, the presence of a definite admixed endometrioid or serous component did not correlate with a significant difference in prognosis. Patients whose tumors had indeterminate clear cell features had better prognosis. Some of these tumors may be endometrioid tumors mimicking clear cell carcinoma.

A complete durable response of vaginal clear cell carcinoma with pembrolizumab: A case report

Primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina represents a rare form of cancer historically correlated with in-utero diethylstibestrol (DES) exposure. Mainstay treatment modalities include surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. There has been a growing interest in immunotherapy in the field of oncology. KEYNOTE 826 demonstrated that patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer including patients who had adenocarcinoma showed improved progression and overall survival by the addition Pembrolizumab to chemotherapy plus or minus bevacizumab. To date, there are no documented cases using pembrolizumab as adjuvant treatment for active or recurrent vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma. We present a case of a young patient with recurrent vaginal clear cell carcinoma who showed a complete and durable response to Pembrolizumab.

Lifestyle intervention in ovarian cancer enhanced survival (LIVES) study (NRG/GOG0225): Recruitment, retention and baseline characteristics of a randomized trial of diet and physical activity in ovarian cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

The Lifestyle Intervention for oVarian cancer Enhanced Survival (LIVES) is a national study of a combined diet and physical activity intervention for stage II-IV ovarian cancer survival, an under-represented cancer in lifestyle behavioral intervention research. Here, we present the data on recruitment, retention, and baseline demographic, clinical and lifestyle behavior characteristics of the LIVES study participants.

METHODS

The LIVES study (NRG Oncology/GOG 0225) is a Phase III diet plus physical activity intervention trial testing the hypothesis that ovarian cancer survivors in the lifestyle intervention will demonstrate better progression-free survival than those in the control condition. Study interventions were delivered via centralized telephone-based health coaching. Baseline descriptive statistics were computed for demographic, clinical, and lifestyle behavior characteristics.

RESULTS

The LIVES study exceeded its recruitment goals, enrolling 1205 ovarian cancer survivors from 195 NRG/NCORP-affiliated oncology practices across 49 states from 2012 to 2018. The mean age of enrollees was 59.6 years; the majority (69.4%) with stage III disease; 89% White, 5.5% Hispanic; 64% overweight/obese. Baseline self-reported diet showed a mean daily intake of 6.6 servings of fruit and vegetables, 62.7 fat grams, and 21.7 g of fiber. Physical activity averaged 13.0 MET-hours/week of moderate to vigorous physical activity; 50.9 h/week of sedentary time. Retention rates exceeded 88%.

CONCLUSION

The LIVES study demonstrates efficiency in recruiting and retaining ovarian cancer survivors in a 24-month study of diet and physical activity intervention with a primary endpoint of progression free survival that will be reported.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT00719303.

Phase III Randomized Trial of Maintenance Taxanes Versus Surveillance in Women With Advanced Ovarian/Tubal/Peritoneal Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group 0212:NRG Oncology Study

PURPOSE

To compare taxane maintenance chemotherapy, paclitaxel (P) and paclitaxel poliglumex (PP), with surveillance (S) in women with ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube (O/PC/FT) cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane therapy.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with O/PC/FT cancer who attained clinical complete response after first-line platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to S or maintenance, P 135 mg/m2 once every 28 days for 12 cycles, or PP at the same dose and schedule. Overall survival (OS) was the primary efficacy end point.

RESULTS

Between March 2005 and January 2014, 1,157 individuals were enrolled. Grade 2 or worse GI adverse events were more frequent among those treated with taxane (PP: 20%, P: 27% v S: 11%). Grade 2 or worse neurologic adverse events occurred more often with taxane treatment (PP: 46%, P: 36% v S: 14%). At the fourth scheduled interim analysis, both taxane regimens passed the OS futility boundary and the Data Monitoring Committee approved an early release of results. With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 653 deaths were reported; none were attributed to the study treatment. Median survival durations were 58.3, 56.8, and 60.0 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Relative to S, the hazard of death for P was 1.091 (95% CI, 0.911 to 1.31; P = .343) and for PP, it was 1.033 (95% CI, 0.862 to 1.24; P = .725). The median times to first progression or death (PFS) were 13.4, 18.9, and 16.3 months for S, P, and PP, respectively. Hazard ratio = 0.801; 95% CI, 0.684 to 0.938; P = .006 for P and hazard ratio = 0.854; 95% CI, 0.729 to 1.00; P = .055 for PP.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance therapy with P and PP did not improve OS among patients with newly diagnosed O/tubal/peritoneal cancer, but may modestly increase PFS. GI and neurologic toxicities were more frequent in the taxane treatment arms.

Endometrial cancer: molecular classification and future treatments

The treatment for endometrial cancer is rapidly evolving with the development of molecular analysis and novel strategies. Surgical resection, cytotoxic chemotherapy, endocrine or hormonal treatment, and radiation have been the staples of treatment for decades. However, precision based approaches for tumours are rapidly becoming a part of these strategies. Biomarker driven treatments are now a part of primary and recurrent treatment algorithms. This review aims to describe the current state of molecular analysis and treatment for endometrial cancer as well as to elucidate potential approaches for the near future.

The presence of an endometrioid component does not alter the clinicopathologic profile or survival of patients with uterine serous cancer: A gynecologic oncology group (GOG/NRG) study of 934 women

OBJECTIVE

While most cases of endometrial cancer can readily be classified as pure endometrioid, pure serous, or another type, others show an apparent mixture of serous and endometrioid components, or indeterminate serous versus endometrioid features. Since serous histology carries a worse prognosis than endometrioid, Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol GOG-8032 was established to examine whether the presence of a non-serous component is a favorable feature in an otherwise serous cancer.

METHODS

934 women with serous cancer were prospectively identified among a larger group enrolled in GOG-0210. Six expert gynecologic pathologists classified each case as pure serous (SER, n=663), mixed serous and endometrioid (SER-EM-M, n=138), or indeterminate serous v. endometrioid (SER-EM-I, n=133) by H&E morphology. Follow-up data from GOG-0210 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The subgroups did not differ on BMI, race, ethnicity, lymphovascular invasion, cervical invasion, ovary involvement, peritoneal involvement, omental involvement, FIGO stage, or planned adjuvant treatment. SER-EM-M patients were younger (p=0.0001) and less likely to have nodal involvement (p=0.0287). SER patients were less likely to have myoinvasion (p=0.0002), and more likely to have adnexal involvement (p=0.0108). On univariate analysis, age, serous subtype, race, and components of FIGO staging predicted both progression-free and overall survival. On multiple regression, however, serous subtype (SER, SER-EM-M, or SER-EM-I) did not significantly predict survival.

CONCLUSIONS

There were few clinicopathologic differences between cases classified as SER, SER-EM-M, and SER-EM-I. Cases with a mixture of serous and endometrioid morphology, as well as cases with morphology indeterminate for serous v. endometrioid type, had the same survival as pure serous cases. NCT#: NCT00340808.

Non-prescription cannabis use for symptom management amongst women with gynecologic malignancies

Objectives

To evaluate interest in and patterns of use of non-prescription cannabis products for symptom management amongst gynecologic cancer patients living in states with legal access to medical and recreational marijuana.

Methods

Cross-sectional study using a novel 35-question survey distributed to women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer within two academic centers in California and Colorado. The survey queries demographic and disease traits, and both objective and subjective issues surrounding use of cannabis products for symptom management. Surveys were distributed to patients actively receiving treatment or under surveillance.

Results

Enrollment began July 16, 2018 and was completed December 1, 2018. Survey return rate was 52.7%. A total of 225 participants met inclusion criteria.

Sixty-two percent reported that they have used or would be interested in using cannabis products for symptom management; 60 (26.7%) are using non-prescription cannabis for treatment of cancer related symptoms, and 80 (35.6%) are interested in using cannabis derivatives under direction of their oncologist. Reasons cited for use of cannabis included: pain control (n = 41, 68.3), insomnia (n = 33, 55.0%), anxiety (n = 29, 48.3%), nausea (n = 26, 43.3%), and appetite stimulation (n = 21, 35.0%). Of the women using cannabis products, almost half report decreased prescription narcotic use after initiation of cannabis products (n = 27, 45.0%).

Conclusions

Women with gynecologic cancer report a strong interest in the use of non-prescription cannabis products for management of cancer-related symptoms. Practitioners in the field of gynecologic oncology should be aware of the frequency of use of non-prescription cannabis amongst their patients as well as the growing desire for guidance about the use of cannabis derivatives. A substantial number of patients report decreased reliance on opioids when using cannabis derivatives for pain control.

•

Cannabis use is increasingly common in women with gynecologic cancer.

•

Most women using cannabis are doing so for pain control.

•

Many women report decreased opioid use after initiation of cannabis for analgesia.

•

Women are desirous of guidance from their oncologist regarding cannabis use for symptom management.

GOG 8020/210: Risk stratification of lymph node metastasis, disease progression and survival using single nucleotide polymorphisms in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVES

The ability to stratify a patient's risk of metastasis and survival permits more refined care. A proof of principle study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in literature based candidate cancer genes and the risk of nodal metastasis and clinical outcome in endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients.

METHODS

Surgically-staged EEC patients from the Gynecologic Oncology Group or Washington University School of Medicine with germline DNA available were eligible. Fifty-four genes represented by 384 SNPs, were evaluated by Illumina Custom GoldenGate array. Association with lymph node metastases was the primary outcome. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was also evaluated.

RESULTS

361 SNPs with high quality genotype data were evaluated in 337 patients with outcome data. Five SNPs in CXCR2 had an odds ratio (OR) between 0.68 and 0.70 (p-value ≤ 0.025). The A allele rs946486 in ABL had an OR of 1.5 (p-value = 0.01) for metastasis. The G allele in rs7795743 in EGFR had an OR for metastasis of 0.68 (p-value = 0.02) and hazard ratio (HR) for progression of 0.66 (p-value = 0.004). Importantly, no SNP met genome wide significance after adjusting for multiple test correcting and clinical covariates. The A allele in rs2159359 SNP in NME1 and the G allele in rs13222385 in EGFR were associated with worse OS. Both exhibited genome wide significance; rs13222385 remained significant after adjusting for prognostic clinical variables.

CONCLUSION

SNPs in cancer genes including rs2159359 SNP in NME1 and rs13222385 in EGFR may stratify risk in EEC and are prioritized for further investigation.

Abstract A85: Receipt of adjuvant endometrial carcinoma treatment according to race: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study

Background: Black women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) experience worse outcomes compared with white women. Differences in receipt of treatment are postulated to contribute to this disparity. While underuse of surgical treatment among black women is well documented, we know less about racial differences in adjuvant treatment. We therefore examined receipt of adjuvant treatment among black and white women in the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Study, a large prospective cohort of women with EC who received uniform surgical treatment but varying adjuvant therapy regimens.

Methods: Our analysis included 615 black and 4,283 white women with EC who underwent either an abdominal hysterectomy or laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymph node dissection. At study enrollment, women completed a questionnaire that assessed race as well as risk factors for EC. Tumor characteristics were available from surgical pathology reports and a centralized review by pathologists with expertise in gynecologic cancers. Adjuvant treatment was documented at the time of the postoperative clinical visits and was categorized as none (54.3%), radiotherapy only (16.5%), chemotherapy only (n=15.2%), and radiotherapy and chemotherapy (14.0%). We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between race and receipt of adjuvant therapy in the overall study population and stratified by tumor subtype (combination of histology and grade) adjusted for age, income, education, and stage.

Results: Black compared with white women had higher odds of receiving combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared to no adjuvant therapy (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.01-1.79) but no difference in receipt of radiotherapy only (OR=0.95, 95% CI=0.72-1.25) or chemotherapy only (OR=0.88 (0.64-1.20) was observed. In tumor-subtype stratified models, black women diagnosed with low-grade endometrioid (OR=2.04, 95% CI=1.06-3.93) or serous tumors (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.07-3.08) had higher odds of receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy than white women, but race was not associated with receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for women with high-grade endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, mixed-cell, or clear-cell tumors. Moreover, the tumor-subtype stratified analyses revealed no racial differences in receipt of radiotherapy-only or chemotherapy-only regimens.

Conclusions: In this study of women with EC who received uniform surgical treatment, we observed racial differences in receipt of some adjuvant treatment regimens but not others. Among women with indolent (i.e., low-grade endometrioid) or aggressive (i.e., serous) tumors, black women had higher odds of receiving radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared to white women. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment is potentially contraindicated for women with indolent tumors, which suggests a need to understand the reasons why clinicians might overprescribe these therapies for black women. Overall, our results suggest racial differences in receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but not for other regimens.

Citation Format: Ashley Felix, David Cohn, Theodore Brasky, David Mutch, William Creasman, Premal Thaker, Joan Walker, Richard Moore, Shashikant Lele, Saketh Guntupalli, Levi Downs, Christa Nagel, John Boggess, Michael Pearl, Olga Ioffe, Wei Deng, Marcus Randall, Louise Brinton. Receipt of adjuvant endometrial carcinoma treatment according to race: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr A85.

Abstract C44: Endometrial carcinoma recurrence in black and white women in the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial

BACKGROUND: Black women diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma have a higher risk of recurrence compared with white women. Higher recurrence risk among black women is due, in part, to a greater frequency of aggressive tumor characteristics including non-endometrioid histologies and advanced stage tumors. The risk of recurrence for black and white women within distinct tumor groupings has not been well-examined due to low numbers of black women and under-representation of aggressive histologic subtypes in single institution studies. Therefore, we examined the association between self-reported race and recurrence risk stratified by histologic subtype in the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG) 210, a prospective observational study that enrolled 6,124 newly diagnosed endometrial carcinoma patients between 2003 and 2011.

METHODS: We restricted this analysis to 618 black and 4,316 white women with endometrial carcinoma. At study enrollment, women completed a questionnaire that assessed risk factors for gynecologic cancers. Recurrence, defined as evidence of disease following complete response to primary therapy, was abstracted from medical records. Tumor characteristics were available from surgical pathology reports and a centralized review by pathologists with expertise in gynecologic cancers. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between race (black vs. white) and recurrence risk in models stratified by histologic subtype (low-grade endometrioid, high-grade endometrioid, serous, mixed epithelial, carcinosarcoma, clear cell) and adjusted for stage (I, II, III, IV), age at diagnosis (continuous), and adjuvant therapy (none, chemotherapy, radiation, chemotherapy and radiation, unknown). We also examined income ($20,000-$39,999, $40,000-$69,999, ≥$70,000) and education (high school/GED, some college/technical school, college graduate/beyond) as potential mediators of the association between race and endometrial carcinoma recurrence risk using the Baron-Kenny method. Median follow-up time was 5 years.

RESULTS: Black women were more frequently diagnosed with non-endometrioid (52.9% vs. 31.8%) and advanced stage (Stage III or IV: 29.0% vs. 21.1%) tumors compared with white women. Recurrence was documented in 26% of black and 17% of white endometrial carcinoma patients. In histologic subtype-stratified models adjusted for stage, age, and adjuvant therapy, a higher risk of recurrence was noted in black women with low-grade endometrioid (HR=1.65, 95% CI=1.07-2.54), mixed epithelial (HR=1.75, 95% CI=1.13-2.71), or carcinosarcomas (HR=1.55, 95% CI=1.03-2.31) compared with white women. No significant race-recurrence relationships were observed among women diagnosed with high-grade endometrioid, serous, or clear cell tumors. After adjustment for income and education, the association of black race and recurrence risk remained elevated, but was not statistically significant: low-grade endometrioid (HR=1.52, 95% CI=0.97-2.38), mixed epithelial (HR=1.56, 95% CI=0.98-2.50), and carcinosarcoma (HR=1.48, 95% CI=0.98-2.25). Further, neither income nor education were significantly associated with recurrence risk in the multivariable models.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence that racial disparities in endometrial carcinoma recurrence risk vary by histologic subtype. Socioeconomic factors do not explain black-white differences in endometrial carcinoma recurrence risk. Future studies exploring the role of biological factors and post-diagnosis surveillance contributing to racial differences in endometrial carcinoma recurrence are warranted.

Citation Format: Ashley S. Felix, Theodore Brasky, David Cohn, Scott McMeekin, David Mutch, Creasman William, Premal Thaker, Joan Walker, Richard Moore, Shashikant Lele, Saketh Guntupalli, Levi Downs, Christa Nagel, John Boggess, Michael Pearl, Olga Ioffe, Kay Park, Shamshad Ali, Louise Brinton. Endometrial carcinoma recurrence in black and white women in the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2016 Sep 25-28; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(2 Suppl):Abstract nr C44.

Cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyoma with adipocytic differentiation: A case report

•The second case of cotyledonoid dissecting lipoleiomyoma documented in the literature is reported.•Cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyoma presents in a similar manner as aggressive malignancies; however, it is a benign lesion.•Recurrence of cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyoma is exceedingly rare with only one documented recurrence following conservative treatment.

Lower uterine segment involvement is associated with poor outcomes in early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic significance of lower uterine segment involvement (LUSI) in endometrial cancer patients remains unclear. Although LUSI has been reported to be a prognostic indicator, literature is limited.

METHODS

We studied 481 surgically staged endometrioid endometrial cancers with disease confined to the uterus (FIGO 1988 stage I or II). Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The relationships between LUSI and OS and DFS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. The t test or Fisher exact test was used for evaluating relationships between variables of interest.

RESULTS

LUSI was present in 223 cases (46.4%), and was associated with both decreased disease free survival (P = 0.02) and overall survival (P = 0.01) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between LUSI and increased risk for recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) 2.27; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09-4.7; P = 0.03] and increased mortality (HR 1.76; 95% CI 1.12-2.78; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LUSI in patients with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer is associated with decreased survival.