1
|
Youn I, Biswas D, Hippe DS, Winter AM, Kazerouni AS, Javid SH, Lee JM, Rahbar H, Partridge SC. Diagnostic Performance of Point-of-Care Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measures to Reduce Biopsy in Breast Lesions at MRI: Clinical Validation. Radiology 2024; 310:e232313. [PMID: 38349238 PMCID: PMC10902596 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
Background The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network Cancer Research Group multicenter A6702 trial identified an optimal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff to potentially reduce biopsies by 21% without affecting sensitivity. Whether this performance can be achieved in clinical settings has not yet been established. Purpose To validate the performance of point-of-care ADC measurements with the A6702 trial ADC cutoff for reducing unnecessary biopsies in lesions detected at breast MRI. Materials and Methods Consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from May 2015 to January 2019 at a single medical center and showing biopsy-confirmed Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 or 5 lesions, without ipsilateral cancer, were identified. Point-of-care lesion ADC measurements collected at clinical interpretation were retrospectively evaluated. MRI examinations included axial T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. Sensitivity and biopsy reduction rates were calculated by applying the A6702 optimal (ADC, 1.53 × 10-3 mm2/sec) and alternate conservative (1.68 × 10-3 mm2/sec) cutoffs. Lesion pathologic outcomes were the reference standard. To assess reproducibility, one radiologist repeated ADC measurements, and agreement was summarized using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results A total of 240 lesions in 201 women (mean age, 49 years ± 13 [SD]) with pathologic outcomes (63 malignant and 177 benign) were included. Applying the optimal ADC cutoff produced an overall biopsy reduction rate of 15.8% (38 of 240 lesions [95% CI: 11.2, 20.9]), with a sensitivity of 92.1% (58 of 63 lesions [95% CI: 82.4, 97.4]; sensitivity was 97.2% [35 of 36 lesions] [95% CI: 82.7, 99.6] for invasive cancers). Results were similar for screening versus diagnostic examinations (P = .92 and .40, respectively). Sensitivity was higher for masses than for nonmass enhancements (NMEs) (100% vs 85.3%; P = .009). Applying the conservative ADC cutoff achieved a sensitivity of 95.2% (60 of 63 lesions [95% CI: 86.7, 99.0]), with a biopsy reduction rate of 10.4% (25 of 240 lesions [95% CI: 6.7, 14.5]). Repeated single-reader measurements showed good agreement with clinical ADCs (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58, 0.81]). Conclusion This study validated the clinical use of ADC cutoffs to reduce MRI-prompted biopsies by up to 16%, with a suggested tradeoff of lowered sensitivity for in situ and microinvasive disease manifesting as NME. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02022579 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Honda and Iima in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debosmita Biswas
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Daniel S. Hippe
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Andrea M. Winter
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Anum S. Kazerouni
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Sara H. Javid
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Janie M. Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| | - Savannah C. Partridge
- From the Departments of Radiology (I.Y., D.B., A.M.W., A.S.K.,
J.M.L., H.R., S.C.P.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), University of Washington School of
Medicine, 1144 Eastlake Ave E, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109; and Clinical Research
Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (D.S.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chau B, Loggers ET, Cranmer LD, Mogal H, Sharib JM, Kim EY, Schaub SK, Paulson KG, Linden HM, Specht JM, Kim JN, Javid SH, Wagner MJ. Secondary Breast Angiosarcoma After a Primary Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:567-571. [PMID: 37725702 PMCID: PMC10841185 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Angiosarcoma is a rare complication of breast-conserving therapy. This study evaluated the change in incidence between 1992 and 2016 of secondary breast angiosarcoma (SBA) in patients with a history of breast cancer and the impact of management strategies for the original breast carcinoma on angiosarcoma treatment. METHODS Breast cancer and angiosarcoma cases were abstracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database. SBAs were defined as angiosarcomas located in the breast occurring after a prior breast cancer diagnosis. Primary breast angiosarcomas (PBAs) were defined as an angiosarcoma diagnosis listed as "one primary only." Incidence rates were estimated using a proportion of the US total population. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival. RESULTS Between 1992 and 2016, 193 cases of SBA were reported in the SEER dataset in patients with a prior history of breast cancer. The incidence of breast angiosarcoma in patients with a prior diagnosis of breast cancer increased 3-fold from about 10 cases per 100,000 person-years to about 30 cases per 100,000 person-years over this same period ( P =0.0037). For treatment of SBA (n=193), almost all (95%) had surgery. Nine percent received radiation (compared with 35% of patients with PBA, P <0.001) and 23% received chemotherapy (vs. 45% for PBA, P =0.11). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate an increasing incidence of SBA over the study period. These data can help inform shared decision-making for optimal management of locoregional breast cancer and raise awareness of secondary angiosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonny Chau
- Division of Medical Oncology
- Department of Surgery
| | | | | | - Harveshp Mogal
- Department of Surgery
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Jeremy M Sharib
- Department of Surgery
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Edward Y Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Stephanie K Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Kelly G Paulson
- Medical Oncology, Providence-Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Hannah M Linden
- Division of Medical Oncology
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Jennifer M Specht
- Division of Medical Oncology
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Janice N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| | - Michael J Wagner
- Division of Medical Oncology
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Abramson V, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch AM, Lyons J, Mortimer J, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rosenberger LH, Rugo HS, Schneider B, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Wei M, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Yeung K, Dwyer MA, Kumar R. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:594-608. [PMID: 37308117 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer address all aspects of management for breast cancer. The treatment landscape of metastatic breast cancer is evolving constantly. The therapeutic strategy takes into consideration tumor biology, biomarkers, and other clinical factors. Due to the growing number of treatment options, if one option fails, there is usually another line of therapy available, providing meaningful improvements in survival. This NCCN Guidelines Insights report focuses on recent updates specific to systemic therapy recommendations for patients with stage IV (M1) disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Rebecca Aft
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Bryan Schneider
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Mei Wei
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Breast MRI is the most sensitive imaging modality for the assessment of newly diagnosed breast cancer extent and can detect additional mammographically and clinically occult breast cancers in the ipsilateral and contralateral breasts. Nonetheless, appropriate use of breast MRI in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer remains debated. Though highly sensitive, MRI is less specific and may result in false positives and overestimation of disease when MRI findings are not biopsied prior to surgical excision. Furthermore, improved anatomic depiction of breast cancer on MRI has not consistently translated to improved clinical outcomes, such as lower rates of re-excision or breast cancer recurrence, though there is a paucity of well-designed studies examining these issues. In addition, current treatment paradigms have been developed in the absence of this more accurate depiction of disease span, which likely has limited the value of MRI. These issues have led to inconsistent and variable utilization of preoperative MRI across practice settings and providers. In this review, we discuss the history of breast MRI and its current use and recommendations with a focus on the preoperative setting. We review the evidence surrounding the use of preoperative MRI in the evaluation of breast malignancies and discuss the data on breast MRI in the setting of specific patient factors often used to determine breast MRI eligibility, such as age, index tumor phenotype, and breast density. Finally, we review the impact of breast MRI on surgical outcomes (re-excision and mastectomy rates) and long-term breast recurrence and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Christensen
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mariam N Shehata
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Diana L Lam
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abraham A, Barcenas CH, Bleicher RJ, Cohen AL, Javid SH, Levine EG, Lin NU, Moy B, Niland JC, Wolff AC, Hassett MJ, Asad S, Stover DG. Clinicopathologic and sociodemographic factors associated with late relapse triple negative breast cancer in a multivariable logistic model: A multi-institution cohort study. Breast 2023; 67:89-93. [PMID: 36681001 PMCID: PMC9982264 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most metastatic recurrences of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) occur within five years of diagnosis, yet late relapses of TNBC (lrTNBC) do occur. Our objective was to develop a risk prediction model of lrTNBC using readily available clinicopathologic and sociodemographic features. METHODS We included patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC between 1998 and 2012 at ten academic cancer centers. lrTNBC was defined as relapse or mortality greater than 5 years from diagnosis. Features associated with lrTNBC were included in a multivariable logistic model using backward elimination with a p < 0.10 criterion, with a final multivariable model applied to training (70%) and independent validation (30%) cohorts. RESULTS A total 2210 TNBC patients with at least five years follow-up and no relapse before 5 years were included. In final multivariable model, lrTNBC was significantly associated with higher stage at diagnosis (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] for stage III vs I, 10.9; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 7.5-15.9; p < 0.0001) and BMI (aOR for obese vs normal weight, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8; p = 0.03). Final model performance was consistent between training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts. CONCLUSIONS A risk prediction model incorporating stage, BMI, and age at diagnosis offers potential utility for identification of patients at risk of development of lrTNBC and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adith Abraham
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Asad
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel G. Stover
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA,Corresponding author. Stefanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Biomedical Research Tower, Room 984 Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Crary IL, Parker EU, Lowry KP, Patwardhan PP, Soong TR, Javid SH, Calhoun KE, Flanagan MR. ASO Visual Abstract: Risk of Lobular Neoplasia Upgrade with Synchronous Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6360. [PMID: 35857198 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12213-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth U Parker
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn P Lowry
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pranav P Patwardhan
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thing Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Meghan R Flanagan
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Crary IL, Parker EU, Lowry KP, Patwardhan PP, Soong TR, Javid SH, Calhoun KE, Flanagan MR. Risk of Lobular Neoplasia Upgrade with Synchronous Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:6350-6358. [PMID: 35802213 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12129-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) and classic lobular carcinoma in situ encompass a spectrum of proliferative lesions known as lobular neoplasia (LN). When imaging-concordant and found in isolation on core needle biopsy (CNB), LN infrequently upgrades to carcinoma on surgical excision, and routine excision is not indicated. Upgrade rates in the setting of synchronous carcinoma are not well studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with radiology-pathology concordant synchronous LN and separately biopsied ipsilateral (n = 35) or contralateral (n = 15) carcinoma who underwent excision between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Frequency of upgrade, to either invasive or in situ carcinoma, was quantified, and factors associated with upgrade were assessed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS The median age was 55 (range 33-74) years. The upgrade rate of LN was 6% and not significantly different between ipsilateral (2.9%) and contralateral (13.3%) carcinoma (p = 0.15). All upgraded LN lesions were ALH on CNB and detected as non-mass enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). No additional disease was demonstrated after excision at the site of the original LN CNB in 22.9% (8 out of 35) of ipsilateral and 13.3% (2 out of 15) of contralateral patients. Upgrade was not associated with family history, menopausal status, imaging modality used to detect LN, or extent of LN on CNB (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate a low upgrade rate (6%) in our study cohort of LN with synchronous ipsilateral or contralateral carcinoma, which suggests that not all LN mandates excision with synchronous carcinoma. Larger, multi-institution studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth U Parker
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn P Lowry
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pranav P Patwardhan
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thing Rinda Soong
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Meghan R Flanagan
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. .,Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Anderson B, Burstein HJ, Chew H, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Isakoff SJ, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch M, Lyons J, Mortimer J, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rosenberger LH, Rugo HS, Sitapati A, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Ward JH, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Burns J, Kumar R. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:691-722. [PMID: 35714673 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 287] [Impact Index Per Article: 143.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Rebecca Aft
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington
| | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - John H Ward
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abraham AS, Barcenas CH, Bleicher RJ, Cohen AL, Javid SH, Levine EG, Lin NU, Moy B, Niland J, Wolff AC, Hassett MJ, Stover DG, Asad S. CLO22-033: Clinicopathologic and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Late Relapse Triple Negative Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Beverly Moy
- 8 Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sarah Asad
- 1 Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chou SHS, Romanoff J, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Carlos R, Badve SS, Xiao J, Corsetti RL, Javid SH, Spell DW, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen IF, Snyder BS, Gatsonis C, Wagner LI, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock CE, Rahbar H. Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial). Radiology 2021; 301:E381. [PMID: 34543146 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021219016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
11
|
Chou SHS, Romanoff J, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Carlos R, Badve SS, Xiao J, Corsetti RL, Javid SH, Spell DW, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen IF, Snyder BS, Gatsonis C, Wagner LI, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock CE, Rahbar H. Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial). Radiology 2021; 301:66-77. [PMID: 34342501 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background There are limited data from clinical trials describing preoperative MRI features and performance in the evaluation of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Purpose To report qualitative MRI features of DCIS, MRI performance in the identification of additional disease, and associations of imaging features with pathologic, genomic, and surgical outcomes from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) E4112 trial. Materials and Methods Secondary analyses of a multicenter prospective clinical trial from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group included women with DCIS diagnosed with conventional imaging techniques (mammography and US), confirmed via core-needle biopsy (CNB), and enrolled between March 2015 and April 2016 who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) based on conventional imaging and clinical examination results. DCIS MRI features and pathologic features from CNB and excision were recorded. Each woman without invasive upgrade of the index DCIS at WLE received a 12-gene DCIS score. MRI performance metrics were calculated. Associations of imaging features with invasive upgrade, dichotomized DCIS score (<39 vs ≥39), and single WLE success were estimated in uni- and multivariable analyses. Results Among 339 women (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 51-66 years), most DCIS cases showed nonmass enhancement (NME) (195 of 339 [58%]) on MRI scans with larger median size than on mammograms (19 mm vs 12 mm; P < .001). Positive predictive value of MRI-prompted CNBs was 32% (21 of 66) (95% CI: 22, 44), yielding an additional cancer detection rate of 6.2% (21 of 339) (95% CI: 4.1, 9.3). MRI false-positive rate was 14.2% (45 of 318) (95% CI: 10.7, 18.4). No imaging features were associated with invasive upgrade or DCIS score (P = .05 to P = .95). Smaller size and focal NME distribution at MRI were linked to single WLE success (P < .001). Conclusion Preoperative MRI depicted ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed with conventional imaging most commonly as nonmass enhancement, with larger median span than mammography, and additional cancer detection rate of 6.2%. MRI features of this subset of DCIS did not enable prediction of pathologic or genomic outcomes. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02352883 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinn-Huey S Chou
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Justin Romanoff
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Constance D Lehman
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Seema A Khan
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ruth Carlos
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Sunil S Badve
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Jennifer Xiao
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ralph L Corsetti
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Sara H Javid
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Derrick W Spell
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Linda K Han
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Jennifer L Sabol
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - John R Bumberry
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Constantine Gatsonis
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Kathy D Miller
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Christopher E Comstock
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gradishar WJ, Moran MS, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, Blair SL, Burstein HJ, Dang C, Elias AD, Giordano SH, Goetz MP, Goldstein LJ, Hurvitz SA, Isakoff SJ, Jankowitz RC, Javid SH, Krishnamurthy J, Leitch M, Lyons J, Matro J, Mayer IA, Mortimer J, O'Regan RM, Patel SA, Pierce LJ, Rugo HS, Sitapati A, Smith KL, Smith ML, Soliman H, Stringer-Reasor EM, Telli ML, Ward JH, Wisinski KB, Young JS, Burns JL, Kumar R. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:484-493. [PMID: 34030128 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer-focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jame Abraham
- 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Rebecca Aft
- 4Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Doreen Agnese
- 5The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | | | - Chau Dang
- 9Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- 17Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | - Janice Lyons
- 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Jennifer Matro
- 16Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hope S Rugo
- 24UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | - Karen Lisa Smith
- 25The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | - John H Ward
- 29Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Verdial FC, Bartek MA, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Genetic testing and surgical treatment after breast cancer diagnosis: Results from a national online cohort. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1504-1512. [PMID: 33735483 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer has implications for breast cancer decision-making. We examined genetic testing rates, factors associated with testing, and the relationship between genetic testing and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). METHODS Patients with breast cancer (2000-2015) from The Health of Women Study were identified and categorized as low, moderate, or high-likelihood of the genetic mutation using a previously published scale based on period-relevant national guidelines incorporating age and family history. Genetic testing and CPM rates were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Among 4170 patients (median age 56-years), 38% were categorized as high-likelihood of having a genetic mutation. Among high-likelihood women, 67% underwent genetic testing, the odds of which were increased among women of higher-education and White-race (p < .001). Among 2028 patients reporting surgical treatment, 385 (19%) chose CPM. CPM rate was highest among mutation-positive women (41%), but 26% of women with negative tests still underwent CPM. Independent of test result, genetic testing increased the odds of CPM on multivariate analysis (adjusted-OR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.29-2.22). CONCLUSIONS Genetic testing rates were higher among women at high-likelihood of mutation carriage, but one-third of these women were not tested. Racial disparities persisted, highlighting the need to improve testing in non-White populations. CPM rates were associated with mutation-carriage and genetic testing, but many women chose CPM despite negative testing, suggesting that well-educated women consider factors other than cancer mortality in selecting CPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francys C Verdial
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Matthew A Bartek
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Asad S, Barcenas CH, Bleicher RJ, Cohen AL, Javid SH, Levine EG, Lin NU, Moy B, Niland J, Wolff AC, Hassett MJ, Stover DG. Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Rapid Relapse in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institution Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:797-804. [PMID: 33691275 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for disproportionately poor outcomes in breast cancer, driven by a subset of rapid-relapse TNBC (rrTNBC) with marked chemoresistance, rapid metastatic spread, and poor survival. Our objective was to evaluate clinicopathologic and sociodemographic features associated with rrTNBC. METHODS We included patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC in 1996 through 2012 who received chemotherapy at 1 of 10 academic cancer centers. rrTNBC was defined as a distant metastatic recurrence event or death ≤24 months after diagnosis. Features associated with rrTNBC were included in a multivariable logistic model upon which backward elimination was performed with a P<.10 criterion, with a final multivariable model applied to training (70%) and independent validation (30%) cohorts. RESULTS Among all patients with breast cancer treated at these centers, 3,016 fit the inclusion criteria. Training cohort (n=2,112) bivariable analyses identified disease stage, insurance type, age, body mass index, race, and income as being associated with rrTNBC (P<.10). In the final multivariable model, rrTNBC was significantly associated with higher disease stage (adjusted odds ratio for stage III vs I, 16.0; 95% CI, 9.8-26.2; P<.0001), Medicaid/indigent insurance, lower income (by 2000 US Census tract), and younger age at diagnosis. Model performance was consistent between the training and validation cohorts. In sensitivity analyses, insurance type, low income, and young age were associated with rrTNBC among patients with stage I/II but not stage III disease. When comparing rrTNBC versus late relapse (>24 months), we found that insurance type and young age remained significant. CONCLUSIONS Timing of relapse in TNBC is associated with stage of disease and distinct sociodemographic features, including insurance type, income, and age at diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Asad
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ellis G Levine
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joyce Niland
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Austin EJ, Lee JR, Bergstedt B, Mitchell AI, Javid SH, Ko CW, Gore JL. "Help me figure this out": Qualitative explorations of patient experiences with cancer pathology reports. Patient Educ Couns 2021; 104:40-44. [PMID: 32800624 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE For patients with a new cancer diagnosis, the pathology report is a critical tool to support diagnosis and decision-making, yet they are designed for providers, not patients. We sought to qualitatively explore patients' experiences receiving and interpreting pathology reports for breast and colorectal cancers. METHODS We conducted four focus groups with patients (n = 23) who had received diagnostic or surgical pathology reports for breast cancer, colorectal cancer or polypectomy. Focus groups discussed patients' experiences with pathology reports and recommendations for improving the patient-centeredness of report design. Focus groups were transcribed and thematic analysis was used to explore patient perspectives. RESULTS Participants described experiences with pathology reports that were fraught with confusion and variability. Three central themes were identified related to how 1) the experience receiving the pathology report, 2) the pathology report language, and 3) the format of pathology reports all influence patient understanding and ability to engage in treatment decision-making. CONCLUSION Due to their complex medical language and challenging framing, traditional pathology reports can contribute to the confusion and uncertainty patients experience as they navigate a new cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J Austin
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jenney R Lee
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Brandelyn Bergstedt
- Office of Patient Experience, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Sara H Javid
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cynthia W Ko
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John L Gore
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang DD, Buscariollo DL, Cronin AM, Weng S, Hughes ME, Bleicher RJ, Cohen AL, Javid SH, Edge SB, Moy B, Niland JC, Wolff AC, Hassett MJ, Punglia RS. Association between the 21-gene recurrence score and isolated locoregional recurrence in stage I-II, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:198. [PMID: 32799886 PMCID: PMC7429461 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01640-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay is widely used to predict distant recurrence risk and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, the relationship between the RS and isolated locoregional recurrence (iLRR) remains poorly understood. Therefore, we examined the association between the RS and risk of iLRR for women with stage I-II, HR+ breast cancer. Methods We identified 1758 women captured in the national prospective Breast Cancer-Collaborative Outcomes Research Database who were diagnosed with stage I-II, HR+ breast cancer from 2006 to 2012, treated with mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery, and received RS testing. Women who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The association between the RS and risk of iLRR was examined using competing risks regression. Results Overall, 19% of the cohort (n = 329) had a RS ≥25. At median follow-up of 29 months, only 22 iLRR events were observed. Having a RS ≥25 was not associated with a significantly higher risk of iLRR compared to a RS < 25 (hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.39–3.36, P = 0.81). When limited to women who received adjuvant endocrine therapy without chemotherapy (n = 1199; 68% of the cohort), having a RS ≥25 (n = 74) was significantly associated with a higher risk of iLRR compared to a RS < 25 (hazard ratio 3.66, 95% confidence interval 1.07–12.5, P = 0.04). In this group, increasing RS was associated with greater risk of iLRR (compared to RS < 18, hazard ratio of 1.66, 3.59, and 7.06, respectively, for RS 18–24, 25–30, and ≥ 31; Ptrend = 0.02). Conclusions The RS was significantly associated with risk of iLRR in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The utility of the RS in identifying patients who have a low risk of iLRR should be further studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David D Yang
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Daniela L Buscariollo
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Angel M Cronin
- Division of Population Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Shicheng Weng
- Division of Population Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Richard J Bleicher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Adam L Cohen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, 1950 Circle of Hope Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356410, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Stephen B Edge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, 665 Elm St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joyce C Niland
- Department of Diabetes and Cancer Discovery Science, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, 401 N. Broadway, Weinberg, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Rinaa S Punglia
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lam DL, Smith J, Partridge SC, Kim A, Javid SH, Hippe DS, Lehman CD, Lee JM, Rahbar H. The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Management of Women with Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Acad Radiol 2020; 27:478-486. [PMID: 31281083 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Use of preoperative breast MRI (pMRI) to evaluate ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) extent is controversial due to limited data on its impact on surgical management. We sought to evaluate the effect of pMRI on surgical management of women with core needle biopsy (CNB)-diagnosed pure DCIS at a multidisciplinary academic institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included all women with CNB-diagnosed DCIS (1/2004-12/2013) without prior ipsilateral breast cancer and who underwent surgery within 180 days of diagnosis. Patient features, number of CNBs and surgeries, and single successful breast conserving surgery (BCS) rate were compared between pMRI and no-pMRI cohorts. Number of surgeries and single BCS success rates were also compared to published US (SEER) and Danish National Registry data. RESULTS Among the 373 women included, no clinical differences were identified between the pMRI (n = 332) and no-pMRI (n = 41) cohorts (p > 0.05). The pMRI group experienced a higher additional CNB rate (30% vs. 7%, p = 0.002) but fewer total surgeries (mean = 1.2 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001) than the no-pMRI group. Among the 245 women for whom BCS was attempted, the pMRI cohort underwent fewer mean surgeries (1.3 vs. 1.7, p < 0.001) with a greater single successful BCS rate (77% vs. 43%, p < 0.001). Compared to published data, women with pMRI who underwent BCS experienced fewer surgeries (difference (Δ) = -0.22 vs. -0.17, p < 0.001) with a higher single successful BCS rate (Δ = +20% vs. +14%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION pMRI may improve surgical management of DCIS at multidisciplinary centers with breast cancer specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana L Lam
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109.
| | - Jacob Smith
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Savannah C Partridge
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Adrienne Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel S Hippe
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Constance D Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janie M Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 1144 Eastlake Avenue East, LG2-200, Seattle, WA 98109
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.,Department of Global Health-Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verdial FC, Bartek MA, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Abstract P2-14-04: Genetic testing and bilateral mastectomy for women with breast cancer: Does testing matter more than the test result? Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-14-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer may allow women with breast cancer to make informed and individualized decisions regarding breast cancer treatment and strategies to reduce the risk of contralateral breast cancer. While rates of bilateral mastectomy (therapeutic mastectomy + contralateral prophylactic mastectomy) among women with unilateral breast cancers are known to be increasing, the factors influencing this decision and the role of genetic testing are poorly understood. We examined bilateral mastectomy rates and factors associated with bilateral mastectomy among women with unilateral breast cancer.
Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer from 2000-2015 from The Health of Women Study, a cohort study led by the Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation. We calculated rates of bilateral mastectomy among women who underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate factors associated with bilateral mastectomy.
Results: Among 2,028 patients who underwent surgery for unilateral breast cancer, 19% underwent bilateral mastectomy. Forty-one percent (n= 84 of 205) of patients who underwent testing and tested positive for a deleterious mutation underwent bilateral mastectomy, compared to 26% (n= 439 of 1,689) of women who tested negative and 12.5% (n= 274 of 2,197) of those not tested. Among those with a negative genetic test, pre-test risk of harboring a genetic mutation (based on family history and age at diagnosis) was not associated with bilateral mastectomy (p=0.250). After adjusting for race, age, level of education, and pre-test mutation risk, the odds of bilateral mastectomy were 69% higher among patients who underwent genetic testing (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.29–2.22, p<0.001) versus those who did not undergo genetic testing. This finding was consistent regardless of genetic test result.
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with bilateral mastectomy Odds ratio95% Confidence Intervalp valueRisk Category Low riskReference--Moderate risk1.470.96 – 2.420.078High risk1.460.92 – 2.320.111 Genetic testing1.691.29 – 2.22<0.001 Genetic test result Not testedReference--Positive test2.711.66 – 4.46<0.001Negative test1.561.18 – 2.070.002*Adjusted for age, race, and level of education.
Conclusions: Genetic testing among breast cancer patients, regardless of test result or pre-test mutation risk, is significantly associated with bilateral mastectomy. Many women (˜1/4) with a negative genetic test and at low risk of hereditary breast cancer, by family history and age at diagnosis, currently undergo bilateral mastectomy with unclear benefits. Further qualitative research will aim to elucidate reasons driving choice of bilateral mastectomy among women with breast cancer.
Citation Format: Verdial FC, Bartek MA, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Genetic testing and bilateral mastectomy for women with breast cancer: Does testing matter more than the test result? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- FC Verdial
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - MA Bartek
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - BO Anderson
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - SH Javid
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dintzis SM, Hansen S, Harrington KM, Tan LC, Miller DM, Ishak L, Parrish-Novak J, Kittle D, Perry J, Gombotz C, Fortney T, Porenta S, Hales L, Calhoun KE, Anderson BO, Javid SH, Byrd DR. Real-time Visualization of Breast Carcinoma in Pathology Specimens From Patients Receiving Fluorescent Tumor-Marking Agent Tozuleristide. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 143:1076-1083. [DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0197-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Context.—
Resection of breast carcinoma with adequate margins reduces the risk of local recurrence and reoperation. Tozuleristide (BLZ-100) is an investigational peptide-fluorophore agent that may aid in intraoperative tumor detection and margin assessment. In this study, fluorescence imaging was conducted ex vivo on gross breast pathology specimens.
Objectives.—
To determine the potential of tozuleristide to detect breast carcinoma in fresh pathology specimens and the feasibility of fluorescence-guided intraoperative pathology assessment of surgical margins.
Design.—
Twenty-three patients received an intravenous bolus dose of 6 or 12 mg of tozuleristide at least 1 hour before surgery. Fifteen lumpectomy and 12 mastectomy specimens were evaluated for fluorescence by the site's clinical pathology staff using the SIRIS, an investigational near-infrared imaging device. The breast tissue was then processed per usual procedures. Fluorescent patterns were correlated with the corresponding hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections. Clinical pathology reports were used to correlate fluorescent signal to grade, histotype, prognostic marker status, and margin measurements.
Results.—
Tozuleristide fluorescence was readily observed in invasive and in situ breast carcinoma specimens. Most invasive carcinomas were bright and focal, whereas in situ lesions demonstrated a less intense, more diffuse pattern. Tozuleristide was detected in ductal and lobular carcinomas with a similar fluorescent pattern. Fluorescence was detected in high- and low-grade lesions, and molecular marker/hormone receptor status did not affect signal. Fluorescence could be used to identify the relationship of carcinoma to margins intraoperatively.
Conclusions.—
Tumor targeting with tozuleristide allowed visual real-time distinction between pathologically confirmed breast carcinoma and normal tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M. Dintzis
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Stacey Hansen
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Kristi M. Harrington
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Lennart C. Tan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Dennis M. Miller
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Laura Ishak
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Julia Parrish-Novak
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - David Kittle
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Jeff Perry
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Carolyn Gombotz
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Tina Fortney
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Stephanie Porenta
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Lisa Hales
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Kristine E. Calhoun
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Benjamin O. Anderson
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - Sara H. Javid
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| | - David R. Byrd
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dr Dintzis) and Surgery (Ms Hales and Drs Calhoun, Javid, and Byrd), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Breast Surgery Clinic (Dr Harrington), Department of Pathology (Dr Tan), and Clinical Trials (Mses Fortney and Porenta), Overlake Hospital Medical Center, Bellevue, Washington; Development (Dr Miller), Clinical Operations (Mses Ishak and Gombotz
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Verdial FC, Javid SH, Tang MTC, Porter PL, Cook LS, Li CI. Body Mass Index and Risks of Recurrence and Mortality by Breast Cancer Subtype. J Am Coll Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
22
|
Hassett MJ, Jiang W, Hughes ME, Edge S, Javid SH, Niland JC, Theriault R, Wong YN, Schrag D, Punglia RS. Treating Second Breast Events After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16:387-394. [PMID: 29632058 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: Because of screening mammography, the number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) survivors has increased dramatically. DCIS survivors may face excess risk of second breast events (SBEs). However, little is known about SBE treatment or its relationship to initial DCIS care. Methods: Among a prospective cohort of women who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS from 1997 to 2008 at institutions participating in the NCCN Outcomes Database, we identified SBEs, described patterns of care for SBEs, and examined the association between DCIS treatment choice and SBE care. Using multivariable regression, we identified features associated with use of mastectomy, radiation therapy (RT), or antiestrogen therapy (AET) for SBEs. Results: Of 2,939 women who underwent BCS for DCIS, 83% received RT and 40% received AET. During the median follow-up of 4.2 years, 200 women (6.8%) developed an SBE (55% ipsilateral, 45% invasive). SBEs occurred in 6% of women who underwent RT for their initial DCIS versus 11% who did not. Local treatment for these events included BCS (10%), BCS/RT (30%), mastectomy (53%), or none (6%); only 28% of patients received AET. Independent predictors of RT or mastectomy for SBEs included younger age, shorter time to SBE diagnosis, and RT or AET for the initial DCIS. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of patients with SBEs were treated with mastectomy, most especially those who previously received RT for their initial DCIS and those who developed an ipsilateral SBE. Despite the occurrence of an SBE, relatively few patients received AET. Future studies should investigate optimal treatment approaches for SBEs, including the benefit of mastectomy versus lumpectomy for an ipsilateral SBE and the benefit of AET for a hormone-receptor-positive SBE contingent on AET use for the initial DCIS diagnosis.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenocarcinoma in Situ/etiology
- Adenocarcinoma in Situ/pathology
- Adenocarcinoma in Situ/therapy
- Adult
- Aged
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/etiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy
- Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects
- Combined Modality Therapy/methods
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mastectomy
- Mastectomy, Segmental
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology
- Neoplasms, Second Primary/therapy
- Risk Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- Tumor Burden
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang YW, Reder NP, Kang S, Glaser AK, Yang Q, Wall MA, Javid SH, Dintzis SM, Liu JTC. Raman-Encoded Molecular Imaging with Topically Applied SERS Nanoparticles for Intraoperative Guidance of Lumpectomy. Cancer Res 2017; 77:4506-4516. [PMID: 28615226 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2017] [Revised: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative identification of carcinoma at lumpectomy margins would enable reduced re-excision rates, which are currently as high as 20% to 50%. Although imaging of disease-associated biomarkers can identify malignancies with high specificity, multiplexed imaging of such biomarkers is necessary to detect molecularly heterogeneous carcinomas with high sensitivity. We have developed a Raman-encoded molecular imaging (REMI) technique in which targeted nanoparticles are topically applied on excised tissues to enable rapid visualization of a multiplexed panel of cell surface biomarkers at surgical margin surfaces. A first-ever clinical study was performed in which 57 fresh specimens were imaged with REMI to simultaneously quantify the expression of four biomarkers HER2, ER, EGFR, and CD44. Combined detection of these biomarkers enabled REMI to achieve 89.3% sensitivity and 92.1% specificity for the detection of breast carcinoma. These results highlight the sensitivity and specificity of REMI to detect biomarkers in freshly resected tissue, which has the potential to reduce the rate of re-excision procedures in cancer patients. Cancer Res; 77(16); 4506-16. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Winston Wang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Nicholas P Reder
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Soyoung Kang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Adam K Glaser
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Qian Yang
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pharmacy, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Matthew A Wall
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Suzanne M Dintzis
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jonathan T C Liu
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cheeney S, Rahbar H, Dontchos BN, Javid SH, Rendi MH, Partridge SC. Apparent diffusion coefficient values may help predict which MRI-detected high-risk breast lesions will upgrade at surgical excision. J Magn Reson Imaging 2017; 46:1028-1036. [PMID: 28181343 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) features could assist in determining which high-risk lesions identified on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) will upgrade to malignancy on surgical excision. MATERIALS AND METHODS This Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved prospective study included participants with MRI-detected Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions with high-risk pathology on CNB who underwent surgical excision. Twenty-three high-risk lesions detected on 3T breast MRI in 20 women (average age = 54 ± 9 years) were evaluated, of which six lesions (26%) upgraded to malignancy at surgery. DCE, DWI characteristics, and clinical factors were compared between high-risk lesions that upgraded to malignancy on surgical excision and those that did not. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify features that optimally predicted upgrade to malignancy, with performance described using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS High-risk lesions that upgraded on excision demonstrated lower apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) than those that did not (median, 1.08 × 10-3 mm2 /s vs.1.39 × 10-3 mm2 /s, P = 0.046), and a trend of greater maximum lesion size (median, 24 mm vs. 8 mm, P = 0.053). There were no significant differences in lesion type (mass vs. nonmass enhancement, P = 1.0) or kinetic features (P = 0.78 for peak initial enhancement; P = 1.0 for worst curve type) among the high-risk cohorts. A model incorporating maximum lesion size and ADC provided optimal performance to predict upgrade to malignancy (AUC = 0.89). CONCLUSION ADC and maximum lesion size on MRI show promise for predicting which MRI-detected high-risk lesions will upgrade to malignancy at surgical excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1028-1036.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia Cheeney
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Brian N Dontchos
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mara H Rendi
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Richards MK, Goldin AB, Beierle EA, Doski JJ, Goldfarb M, Langer M, Nuchtern JG, Vasudevan S, Gow KW, Javid SH. Breast Malignancies in Children: Presentation, Management, and Survival. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:1482-1491. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5747-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
26
|
|
27
|
Simianu VV, Morris AM, Varghese TK, Porter MP, Henderson JA, Buchwald DS, Flum DR, Javid SH. Evaluating disparities in inpatient surgical cancer care among American Indian/Alaska Native patients. Am J Surg 2016; 212:297-304. [PMID: 26846176 PMCID: PMC4939142 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Revised: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) patients with cancer have the lowest survival rates of all racial and ethnic groups, possibly because they are less likely to receive "best practice" surgical care than patients of other races. METHODS Prospective cohort study comparing adherence with generic and cancer-specific guidelines on processes of surgical care between AI/AN and non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients in Washington State (2010 to 2014) was conducted. RESULTS A total of 156 AI/AN and 6,030 NHW patients underwent operations for 10 different cancers, and had similar mean adherence to generic surgical guidelines (91.5% vs 91.9%, P = .57). AI/AN patients with breast cancer less frequently received preoperative diagnostic core needle biopsy (81% vs 94%, P = .004). AI/AN patients also less frequently received care adherent to prostate cancer-specific guidelines (74% vs 92%, P = .001). CONCLUSION Although AI/ANs undergoing cancer operations in Washington receive similar overall best practice surgical cancer care to NHW patients, there remain important, modifiable disparities that may contribute to their lower survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad V Simianu
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, UW Medical Center, Box 354808, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Arden M Morris
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Thomas K Varghese
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, UW Medical Center, Box 354808, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Michael P Porter
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Dedra S Buchwald
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David R Flum
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, UW Medical Center, Box 354808, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, UW Medical Center, Box 354808, 1107 NE 45th Street, Suite 502, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Johnston BS, Kitsch AE, Ramesh K, Korde LA, Javid SH, Lee JM, Peacock S, Lehman CD, Partridge SC, Rahbar H. Can preoperative breast MRI help predict DCIS recurrence? J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.11552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Averi E Kitsch
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Karthik Ramesh
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Sara H. Javid
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Janie M. Lee
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Susan Peacock
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Flanagan MR, Rendi MH, Calhoun KE, Anderson BO, Javid SH. Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ: Radiologic-Pathologic Features and Clinical Management. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:4263-9. [PMID: 25893410 PMCID: PMC4609251 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4552-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) is an unusual variant of LCIS for which optimal management remains unclear. METHODS We conducted a 15-year (2000-2014) retrospective chart review of the radiologic, pathologic, clinical management, and recurrence rates of patients with PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy. Fifty-one patients were found to have PLCIS either alone or with concomitant breast cancer. Of these, 23 were found to have pure PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy. Rates of upstaging after local excision, positive or close margins, mastectomy, and recurrence associated with pure pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ were examined. RESULTS Of the 21 patients who underwent surgical excision following diagnostic biopsy, 33.3 % (7/21) were found to have invasive carcinoma, and 19 % (4/23) were found to have ductal carcinoma in situ. Extensive or multifocal PLCIS was present in 47.6 % (10/21) of patients, corresponding to at least one PLCIS-positive or close margin in 71.4 % (15/21). In total, there were 11 local re-excisions in nine patients, and 12 mastectomies. No ipsilateral breast cancer events have occurred, including in those with positive or close surgical margins (mean follow-up 4.1 years). CONCLUSIONS Patients with isolated PLCIS on diagnostic biopsy are at high risk of upgrading to invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ at diagnostic excision. PLCIS often is extensive, with high rates of positive or close surgical resection margins. If negative PLCIS margins are pursued, rates of successful breast conservation are low. In light of this and low recurrence rates, caution should be exercised in aggressively treating PLCIS with excision to clear margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan R Flanagan
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mara H Rendi
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kristine E Calhoun
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Flanagan MR, Rendi MH, Gadi VK, Calhoun KE, Gow KW, Javid SH. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Retrospective Analysis from 2005 to 2012 in the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:3264-72. [PMID: 26202556 PMCID: PMC4552572 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4668-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) has been shown to reduce the risk of second breast cancer events in women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). There is no population-level evaluation of AET use in DCIS patients after standardized reporting of estrogen receptor (ER) status in cancer registries in 2004. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with DCIS in the National Cancer Data Base between 2005 and 2012. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as temporal trends associated with receipt of AET were evaluated by generalized linear regression. RESULTS Among 206,255 DCIS patients, 36.5% received AET. Fewer than half of ER-positive patients (n = 62,146, 46.4%) received AET, with a modest but significant increase over time (43.6% in 2005 to 47.5% in 2012; unadjusted p trend <0.001). AET decreased among ER-negative patients (8.9-6.5%, p trend <0.001) over the same time period. On multivariate analysis, younger (<40 years) and older (≥70 years) women were less likely to receive AET than 50- to 59-year-old women (<40 years: relative risk 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.82-0.89; ≥70 years: relative risk 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.81). ER-positive status conferred a 6.15-fold higher likelihood of receiving AET compared to ER-negative status (95% confidence interval 5.81-6.50). Women who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy were most likely to receive AET. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of AET is relatively low in the group of women most likely to benefit from its use, namely ER-positive patients who underwent BCS. Significant variation exists with respect to patient, tumor, site, and treatment factors. More tolerable drugs or clearer guideline recommendations may increase use.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/surgery
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mastectomy
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Grading
- Neoplasm Staging
- Prognosis
- Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism
- Retrospective Studies
- Time Factors
- United States/epidemiology
Collapse
|
31
|
Dietz JR, Partridge AH, Gemignani ML, Javid SH, Kuerer HM. Breast Cancer Management Updates: Young and Older, Pregnant, or Male. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22:3219-24. [PMID: 26265366 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4755-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Every year, more and more patients fall into rare or extreme categories of breast cancer-young, elderly, pregnant, or male. Contributing factors may be improved risk assessment and screening techniques (especially of dense breast tissue), delayed childbearing, and the aging population. These patients can challenge usual medical decision making because of their unique situation. There might be a concern for the fetus, worry about future fertility, a question of local control in a man, or concern for overdiagnosis or overtreatment in an older patient. Because these populations are seldom included in the large breast cancer trials from which standard treatment recommendations are made, an update on management for young, elderly, pregnant, and male breast cancer patients may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill R Dietz
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara L Kemp
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
McCormick B, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Javid SH, Khan SA, Mortimer J, Niland JC, Weeks JC, Edge SB. Impact of guideline changes on use or omission of radiation in the elderly with early breast cancer: practice patterns at National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 219:796-802. [PMID: 25127504 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 05/23/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast radiation therapy (RT) is a care standard after breast-conservation surgery that improves local control and survival in women. In 2004, a phase III trial demonstrated radiation after breast-conservation surgery provided no survival and limited local control benefit to women aged 70 years and older with stage I, estrogen receptor-positive cancers who receive endocrine therapy. This led to breast-conservation surgery and endocrine therapy alone being incorporated as a category I option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for older women in 2004. We examined factors associated with change in radiation use in elderly patients at 13 NCCN centers. STUDY DESIGN We identified women treated at NCCN centers meeting age and stage criteria during 2000 to 2009. Factors considered a priori potentially associated with RT use were evaluated in univariate and multivariable models, including year of diagnosis, tumor and patient characteristics, axillary surgery, and treating institution. Date of diagnosis was classified as 2000 to 2004 vs 2005 to 2009, reflecting when guidelines changed. RESULTS Among 1,292 eligible cases, 78% received RT. In multivariable analysis, diagnosis after 2004 (p = 0.0003), older age (p < 0.0001), higher comorbidity score (p = 0.0006), smaller tumors (p = 0.0146), and omission of axillary surgery (p < 0.0001) predicted RT omission. Ninety-four percent of women aged 70 to 74 years received RT in 2000, compared with 88% in 2009. For the same times and age 80 years and older, RT use was 80% vs 41%. Finally, RT use was associated with treating institution (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS After guideline changes for RT use in older women, NCCN centers demonstrated wide variation in implementing change. This suggests other factors are also influencing guideline uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sara H Javid
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Seema A Khan
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Stephen B Edge
- Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Javid SH, Fang LC, Korde L, Anderson BO. Renaming ductal carcinoma in situ: would removing "carcinoma" reduce overtreatment? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2014; 12:599-602. [PMID: 24717574 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
35
|
Javid SH, Varghese TK, Morris AM, Porter MP, He H, Buchwald D, Flum DR. Guideline-concordant cancer care and survival among American Indian/Alaskan Native patients. Cancer 2014; 120:2183-90. [PMID: 24711210 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 02/04/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/ANs) have the worst 5-year cancer survival of all racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Causes for this disparity are unknown. The authors of this report examined the receipt of cancer treatment among AI/AN patients compared with white patients. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 338,204 patients who were diagnosed at age ≥65 years with breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer between 1996 and 2005 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Nationally accepted guidelines for surgical and adjuvant therapy and surveillance were selected as metrics of optimal, guideline-concordant care. Treatment analyses compared AI/ANs with matched whites. RESULTS Across cancer types, AI/ANs were less likely to receive optimal cancer treatment and were less likely to undergo surgery (P ≤ .025 for all cancers). Adjuvant therapy rates were significantly lower for AI/AN patients with breast cancer (P < .001) and colon cancer (P = .001). Rates of post-treatment surveillance also were lower among AI/ANs and were statistically significantly lower for AI/AN patients with breast cancer (P = .002) and prostate cancer (P < .001). Nonreceipt of optimal cancer treatment was associated with significantly worse survival across cancer types. Disease-specific survival for those who did not undergo surgery was significantly lower for patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62), colon cancer (HR, 0.74), prostate cancer (HR, 0.52), and lung cancer (HR, 0.36). Survival rates also were significantly lower for those patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (HR, 0.56), colon cancer (HR, 0.59), or prostate cancer (HR, 0.81; all 95% confidence intervals were <1.0). CONCLUSIONS Fewer AI/AN patients than white patients received guideline-concordant cancer treatment across the 4 most common cancers. Efforts to explain these differences are critical to improving cancer care and survival for AI/AN patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Javid SH, He H, Korde LA, Flum DR, Anderson BO. Predictors and outcomes of completion axillary node dissection among older breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:2172-80. [PMID: 24585407 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3595-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for older women who had sentinel lymph node-positive (SLN+) invasive breast cancer is unclear. We examined factors predictive of ALND and the association between ALND, adjuvant chemotherapy administration, and survival. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we reviewed records of women age >65 diagnosed with stage I/II breast cancer from 1998-2005. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify patient and disease variables associated with ALND, and assess association between ALND and all-cause and breast cancer-specific survival. RESULTS Among SLN+ patients, 88 % underwent ALND. Earlier diagnosis year, greater nodal involvement, younger age, registry location, and larger tumor size were all associated with a significantly higher likelihood of ALND. The ALND in SLN+ patients was not significantly associated with 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.96). The SLN+ patients who underwent ALND were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95 % CI 1.45-2.24). However, younger age (OR 18.0, 95 % CI 14.4-23.9), estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) status (OR 4.2, 95 % CI 3.4-5.3), and fewer comorbidities (OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.7-4.0) were all more strongly linked to receipt of chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS ALND for older patients with SLN+ breast cancer is not associated with improved 5-year all-cause or breast cancer-specific survival. Younger age, fewer comorbidities, and estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) status were more strongly associated with receipt of chemotherapy than ALND. Consideration should be given to omitting ALND in older patients, particularly if findings of ALND will not influence adjuvant therapy decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Javid
- Departments of Surgery, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA, USA,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mead EL, Doorenbos AZ, Javid SH, Haozous EA, Alvord LA, Flum DR, Morris AM. Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:e15-29. [PMID: 24134353 PMCID: PMC3828995 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
To assess decision-making for cancer treatment among racial/ethnic minority patients, we systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence from studies of "shared decision-making," "cancer," and "minority groups," using PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We identified significant themes that we compared across studies, refined, and organized into a conceptual model. Five major themes emerged: treatment decision-making, patient factors, family and important others, community, and provider factors. Thematic data overlapped categories, indicating that individuals' preferences for medical decision-making cannot be authentically examined outside the context of family and community. The shared decision-making model should be expanded beyond the traditional patient-physician dyad to include other important stakeholders in the cancer treatment decision process, such as family or community leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Mead
- Erin L. Mead is with the Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Ardith Z. Doorenbos is with the Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle. Sara H. Javid and David R. Flum are with the Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Emily A. Haozous is with the University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Albuquerque. Lori Arviso Alvord is with the University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson. Arden M. Morris is with the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mead EL, Doorenbos AZ, Javid SH, Haozous EA, Alvord LA, Flum DR, Morris AM. Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. Am J Public Health 2013. [PMID: 24134353 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301631.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
To assess decision-making for cancer treatment among racial/ethnic minority patients, we systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence from studies of "shared decision-making," "cancer," and "minority groups," using PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and EMBASE. We identified significant themes that we compared across studies, refined, and organized into a conceptual model. Five major themes emerged: treatment decision-making, patient factors, family and important others, community, and provider factors. Thematic data overlapped categories, indicating that individuals' preferences for medical decision-making cannot be authentically examined outside the context of family and community. The shared decision-making model should be expanded beyond the traditional patient-physician dyad to include other important stakeholders in the cancer treatment decision process, such as family or community leaders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Mead
- Erin L. Mead is with the Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Ardith Z. Doorenbos is with the Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle. Sara H. Javid and David R. Flum are with the Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle. Emily A. Haozous is with the University of New Mexico College of Nursing, Albuquerque. Lori Arviso Alvord is with the University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson. Arden M. Morris is with the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hasson RM, Briggs A, Carothers AM, Davids JS, Wang J, Javid SH, Cho NL, Bertagnolli MM. Estrogen receptor α or β loss in the colon of Min/+ mice promotes crypt expansion and impairs TGFβ and HNF3β signaling. Carcinogenesis 2013; 35:96-102. [PMID: 24104551 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)-regulated Wnt and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) signaling cooperate in the intestine to maintain normal enterocyte functions. Human clinical trials showed that estrogen [17β-estradiol (E2)], the ligand of nuclear receptors estrogen receptor α (ERα) and ERβ, inhibited colorectal cancer (CRC) in women. Consistent with this finding, we reported that E2, ERα and ERβ suppressed intestinal tumorigenesis in the C57BL/6J-Min/+ (Min/+) mouse, a CRC model. Here, we extended our results with further comparisons of colon and small intestine from intact female Apc (+/+) (WT), Min/+ and ER-deficient Min/+ mice. In the colon of ER-deficient Min/+ mice, ER loss reduced TGFβ signaling in crypt base cells as evidenced by minimal expression of the effectors Smad 2, 3 and 4 in these strains. We also found reduced expression of Indian hedgehog (Ihh), bone morphogenetic protein 4 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 3β or FoxA2, factors needed for paracrine signaling between enterocytes and mesenchyme. In proximal colon, ER loss produced a >10-fold increased incidence of crypt fission, a marker for wound healing and tumor promotion. These data, combined with our previous work detailing the specific roles of E2, ERα and ERβ in the colon, suggest that ER activity helps to maintain the intestinal stem cell (ISC) microenvironment by modulating epithelial-stromal crosstalk in ways that regulate cytokine, Wnt and Ihh availability in the extracellular matrix (ECM).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rian M Hasson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
|
41
|
Luis IMVD, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Mamet R, Burstein HJ, Edge SB, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Javid SH, Moy B, Rugo HS, Theriault RL, Weeks JC, Lin NU. Time trends in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) and outcomes in women with T1N0 breast cancer (BC) in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1006 Background: The role of adjuvant CTX in women with small BC is controversial. Here we analyze time trends of CTX use and outcomes in women with T1N0 BC treated at NCCN cancer centers. Methods: 8917 women were identified who received surgery or systemic therapy at an NCCN center with T1a, T1b or T1c N0 M0 BC between 2000-09. Tumors were grouped by biologic subgroups by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and T subgroups (T1a, T1b, T1c). Primary endpoints were receipt of adjuvant CTX (± trastuzumab) and BC specific survival (BCSS). Chi-square, Cochran Armitage trend, Kaplan Meier estimates, log-rank test and Cox hazard proportional regression were used for analysis. In this report we focus on T1a/b results (N=4113). Results: Median follow up time was 5.5 years (range, 0.7-12.7). CTX use differed according to biologic and T subgroups, with significant changes over time (Table). In 2009, more than 50% of patients (pts) with HER2+ and HR-2- T1a/b breast cancers received CTX (± trastuzumab). The table lists use of CTX by year and subset and the 5 year BCSS for pts treated and not treated with CTX. Conclusions: A high proportion of pts with HER2+ and HR-HER2- T1N0 breast cancers received adjuvant CTX, with a sharp increase in use of CTX among HER2+ over the past decade. Use of CTX is higher in T1b compared to T1a tumors. In this study, women with T1a and T1b tumors have an excellent prognosis without CTX at 5 Yr. Careful examination of cutoffs for absolute benefit sufficient to recommend CTX is warranted. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yadav BS, Bansal A, Sharma SC, Javid SH, Anderson BO, Vaklavas C, Forero A, Ravi V, Patel S, Boudadi K, Chugh R, Morris GJ. A 62-year-old woman with osteogenic sarcoma in the contralateral breast 15 years after treatment for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2013; 40:135-44. [PMID: 23540738 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Budhi S Yadav
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Vandergrift JL, Niland JC, Theriault RL, Edge SB, Wong YN, Loftus LS, Breslin TM, Hudis CA, Javid SH, Rugo HS, Silver SM, Lepisto EM, Weeks JC. Time to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in National Comprehensive Cancer Network institutions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 105:104-12. [PMID: 23264681 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-quality care must be not only appropriate but also timely. We assessed time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer as well as factors associated with delay to help identify targets for future efforts to reduce unnecessary delays. METHODS Using data from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Outcomes Database, we assessed the time from pathological diagnosis to initiation of chemotherapy (TTC) among 6622 women with stage I to stage III breast cancer diagnosed from 2003 through 2009 and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in nine NCCN centers. Multivariable models were constructed to examine factors associated with TTC. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Mean TTC was 12.0 weeks overall and increased over the study period. A number of factors were associated with a longer TTC. The largest effects were associated with therapeutic factors, including immediate postmastectomy reconstruction (2.7 weeks; P < .001), re-excision (2.1 weeks; P < .001), and use of the 21-gene reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay (2.2 weeks; P < .001). In comparison with white women, a longer TTC was observed among black (1.5 weeks; P < .001) and Hispanic (0.8 weeks; P < .001) women. For black women, the observed disparity was greater among women who transferred their care to the NCCN center after diagnosis (P (interaction) = .008) and among women with Medicare vs commercial insurance (P (interaction) < .001). CONCLUSIONS Most observed variation in TTC was related to use of appropriate therapeutic interventions. This suggests the importance of targeted efforts to minimize potentially preventable causes of delay, including inefficient transfers in care or prolonged appointment wait times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan L Vandergrift
- Outcomes Research Group, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Javid SH, Lehman CD. Imaging Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2012; 41:149-58. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2011.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
45
|
Javid SH, Unger JM, Gralow JR, Moinpour CM, Wozniak AJ, Goodwin JW, Lara PN, Williams PA, Hutchins LF, Gotay CC, Albain KS. A prospective analysis of the influence of older age on physician and patient decision-making when considering enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials (SWOG S0316). Oncologist 2012; 17:1180-90. [PMID: 22723506 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients older than 65 years are underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a prospective study (SWOG S0316) to determine physician- and patient-perceived barriers to breast cancer clinical trial enrollment for older patients. METHODS Eight geographically diverse SWOG institutions participated. The study assessed patients' and physicians' decisions to enroll in or decline clinical treatment trials, including demographics, trial availability, and eligibility. Patient and physician questionnaires elicited concerns related to treatment, medical status, age, family, and financial or transportation concerns. RESULTS A total of 1,079 patients were registered and eligible and 909 (84%) returned for follow-up. The major reason for nonaccrual was either trial unavailability or ineligibility (60%). Older patients were less likely to be eligible for trials (65% for age ≥65 years vs. 78% for age <65 years). If eligible, trial participation rates did not differ significantly by age (34% for age ≥65 years vs. 40% for age <65 years). Patients ≥65 years more often were concerned about side effects, had friends opposed to participation, or believed that participation would not benefit other generations. When trials were available and patients were eligible, physicians discussed trial participation with 76% of patients <65 years versus 58% of patients ≥65 years of age. For patients ≥65 years, 11% of physicians indicated age as a reason they did not enroll a patient in a clinical trial. CONCLUSION Trial unavailability or patient ineligibility were the major reasons for lack of enrollment in breast cancer clinical trials for patients of all ages in this prospective study. Older patients were less likely to be eligible for trials, but if eligible they participated at similar rates to younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Javid
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA 98195-6410, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Arvold ND, Punglia RS, Hughes ME, Jiang W, Edge SB, Javid SH, Laronga C, Niland JC, Theriault RL, Weeks JC, Wong YN, Lee SJ, Hassett MJ. Pathologic characteristics of second breast cancers after breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer 2012; 118:6022-30. [PMID: 22674478 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2011] [Revised: 04/12/2012] [Accepted: 05/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increasing. Although many eventually develop a second breast cancer (SBC), little is known about the characteristics of SBCs. The authors described the characteristics of SBC and examined associations between the pathologic features of SBC and index DCIS cases. METHODS Women were identified in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Outcomes Database who were diagnosed with DCIS from 1997 to 2008 and underwent lumpectomy and who subsequently developed SBC (including DCIS or invasive disease that occurred in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast). The Fisher exact test and the Spearman test were used to examine associations between the pathologic characteristics of SBC and index DCIS cases. RESULTS Among 2636 women who underwent lumpectomy for DCIS, 150 (5.7%) experienced an SBC after a median of 55.5 months of follow-up. Of these 150 women, 105 (70%) received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 50 (33.3%) received tamoxifen for their index DCIS. SBCs were ipsilateral in 54.7% of women and invasive in 50.7% of women. Among the index DCIS cases, 60.6% were estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and 54% were high grade, whereas 77.5% of SBCs were ER-positive, and 48.2% were high grade. Tumor grade (P = .003) and ER status (P = .02) were associated significantly between index DCIS and SBC, whereas tumor size was not (P = .87). CONCLUSIONS After breast conservation for DCIS, SBC in either breast exhibited pathologic characteristics similar to the index DCIS, suggesting that women with DCIS may be at risk for developing subsequent breast cancers of a similar phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils D Arvold
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Javid SH, Anderson BO. Tailored strategies for DCIS management. Oncology (Williston Park) 2011; 25:861-863. [PMID: 21936453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sara H Javid
- 'University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Javid SH, Kirstein LJ, Rafferty E, Lipsitz S, Moore R, Rusby JE, Murphy CD, Hughes KS, Specht MC, Taghian AG, Smith BL. Outcome of multiple-wire localization for larger breast cancers: do multiple wires translate into additional imaging, biopsies, and recurrences? Am J Surg 2009; 198:368-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2008] [Revised: 01/17/2009] [Accepted: 01/17/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
50
|
Javid SH, Smith BL, Mayer E, Bellon J, Murphy CD, Lipsitz S, Golshan M. Tubular carcinoma of the breast: results of a large contemporary series. Am J Surg 2009; 197:674-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2008] [Revised: 05/29/2008] [Accepted: 05/29/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|