Trust matters: The Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe Study

This article presents the design of a seven-country study focusing on childhood vaccines, Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy in Europe (VAX-TRUST), developed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consists of (a) situation analysis of vaccine hesitancy (examination of individual, socio-demographic and macro-level factors of vaccine hesitancy and analysis of media coverage on vaccines and vaccination and (b) participant observation and in-depth interviews of healthcare professionals and vaccine-hesitant parents. These analyses were used to design interventions aimed at increasing awareness on the complexity of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals involved in discussing childhood vaccines with parents. We present the selection of countries and regions, the conceptual basis of the study, details of the data collection and the process of designing and evaluating the interventions, as well as the potential impact of the study. Laying out our research design serves as an example of how to translate complex public health issues into social scientific study and methods.

Countering vaccine hesitancy: a systematic review of interventions to strengthen healthcare professionals' action

BACKGROUND

Vaccine hesitancy is relevant for healthcare professionals (HCPs) who face challenges in building trusting relationships with patients. Accordingly, the VAX-TRUST project has been developed to improve experiences of HCPs and patients dealing with vaccinations. To support VAX-TRUST, this work aimed to identify latest interventions targeted at HCPs to address hesitancy and increase vaccine uptake.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA by searching PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. Articles were eligible if evaluated interventions directly targeted at HCPs/healthcare students. The search was run on 26 January 2022. Articles published in 2016 or after were included.

RESULTS

A total of 17 492 records were identified; 139 articles were selected. Most articles were set in USA (n = 110). Over half had a pre-post design without a control group (n = 78). A total of 41 articles focused on single-component interventions, 60 on multi-component interventions involving only HCPs and/or students and 38 on multi-component interventions involving also other professionals. Main components were in-person education (n = 76), synchronous (n = 10) and asynchronous (n = 23) online learning, educational materials (n = 26), performance assessment and feedback (n = 33), electronic record changes (n = 30), role play/simulation (n = 21) and online games/apps (n = 5). Educational sessions were mainly about scientific update or communication. Outcomes of interventions were grouped in: vaccination rates (n = 69), knowledge (n = 32), attitudes (n = 26), confidence in counselling (n = 30) and acceptability (n = 16).

CONCLUSIONS

Apps, gaming, role play/simulations could represent innovative interventions. This review highlighted the need of delving into communication strategies and using more robust evaluations, longer follow-up and standardized measurements.

Prevalence and in-hospital outcome of patients with sepsis in an internal medicine ward

OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is a "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection", which is identified by a >2 point increase from patient baseline in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFAs). The prevalence and outcome of patients with sepsis has been mainly assessed in ICU patients, while few data are available for patients admitted to internal medicine wards. Our purpose was to evaluate the prevalence and the clinical outcome of patients with sepsis in an internal medicine-ward.

DESIGN

This is a single-center retrospective observational study evaluating all patients admitted over a 2-month period (October and Novembre 2015) in the internal medicine ward of the San Giovanni di Dio Hospital in Florence. Patients with clinical and/or instrumental signs of bacterial infection were evaluated with SOFAs and divided into patients with and without sepsis.

RESULTS

635 patients were evaluated, and 279 of them (43.9%) were diagnosed with a bacterial infection. The diagnosis of sepsis was made in 93 patients (14.6%). In-hospital mortality and transfer to ICU were observed in 16% of patients with sepsis and in 2.5% of patients without sepsis (p<0.0001). A SOFAs value <2 had a negative predic-tive value of 97.5%, and increasing values of SOFAs were associated with a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that: a) a high proportion of patients hospitalized in an internal medicine ward are affected by sepsis; b) these patients are burdened with high in-hospital mortality or transfer to ICU; c) SOFA score has a high prognostic power.

In-vitro activity of nisin against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile

Nisin is a cationic peptide produced by Lactococcus lactis. Its activity against clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile was compared to that of vancomycin and metronidazole by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and time-kill studies. Nisin was more active than the other agents, with a MIC90 of 0.256 mg/L and strong bactericidal activity. Nisin may be a promising agent for the management of C. difficile associated diarrhea.