1
|
Zhao E, Hirase T, Kim AG, Du JY, Amen TB, Araghi K, Subramanian T, Kamil R, Shahi P, Fourman MS, Asada T, Simon CZ, Singh N, Korsun M, Tuma OC, Zhang J, Lu AZ, Mai E, Kim AYE, Allen MRJ, Kwas C, Dowdell JE, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. The Impact of Posterior Intervertebral Osteophytes on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:652-660. [PMID: 38193931 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE (1) To develop a reliable grading system to assess the severity of posterior intervertebral osteophytes and (2) to investigate the impact of posterior intervertebral osteophytes on clinical outcomes after L5-S1 decompression and fusion through anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and minimally-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). BACKGROUND There is limited evidence regarding the clinical implications of posterior lumbar vertebral body osteophytes for ALIF and MIS-TLIF surgeries and there are no established grading systems that define the severity of these posterior lumbar intervertebral osteophytes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing L5-S1 ALIF or MIS-TLIF was performed. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 2-week, 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month follow-up time points were assessed. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for ODI of 14.9 and VAS leg of 2.8 were utilized. Osteophyte grade was based on the ratio of osteophyte length to foraminal width. "High-grade" osteophytes were defined as a maximal osteophyte length >50% of the total foraminal width. RESULTS A total of 70 consecutive patients (32 ALIF and 38 MIS-TLIF) were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in patient-reported outcome measures or achievement of MCID for Leg VAS or ODI preoperatively or at any follow-ups. On multivariate analysis, neither the surgical approach nor the presence of high-grade foraminal osteophytes was associated with leg VAS or ODI scores at any follow-up time point. In addition, neither the surgical approach nor the presence of high-grade foraminal osteophytes was associated with the achievement of MCID for leg VAS or ODI at 6 months. CONCLUSION ALIF and MIS-TLIF are both valid options for treating degenerative spine conditions and lumbar radiculopathy, even in the presence of high-grade osteophytes that significantly occupy the intervertebral foramen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Zhao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Takashi Hirase
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Andrew G Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Jerry Y Du
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Troy B Amen
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Robert Kamil
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Maximilian Korsun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Olivia C Tuma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Joshua Zhang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Amy Z Lu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Eric Mai
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Ashley Yeo Eun Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Spine Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Myles R J Allen
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Cole Kwas
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Subramanian T, Kaidi A, Shahi P, Asada T, Hirase T, Vaishnav A, Maayan O, Amen TB, Araghi K, Simon CZ, Mai E, Tuma OC, Eun Kim AY, Singh N, Korsun MK, Zhang J, Allen M, Kwas CT, Kim ET, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Practical Answers to Frequently Asked Questions in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-00952. [PMID: 38709837 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical counseling enables shared decision making and optimal outcomes by improving patients' understanding about their pathologies, surgical options, and expected outcomes. Here, we aimed to provide practical answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) from patients undergoing an anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) for the treatment of degenerative conditions. METHODS Patients who underwent primary one-level or two-level ACDF or CDR for the treatment of degenerative conditions with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Data were used to answer 10 FAQs that were generated from author's experience of commonly asked questions in clinic before ACDF or CDR. RESULTS A total of 395 patients (181 ACDF, 214 CDR) were included. (1, 2, and 3) Will my neck/arm pain and physical function improve? Patients report notable improvement in all patient-reported outcome measures. (4) Is there a chance I will get worse? 13% (ACDF) and 5% (CDR) reported worsening. (5) Will I receive a significant amount of radiation? Patients on average received a 3.7 (ACDF) and 5.5 mGy (CDR) dose during. (6) How long will I stay in the hospital? Most patients get discharged on postoperative day one. (7) What is the likelihood that I will have a complication? 13% (8% minor and 5% major) experienced in-hospital complications (ACDF) and 5% (all minor) did (CDR). (8) Will I need another surgery? 2.2% (ACDF) and 2.3% (CDR) of patients required a revision surgery. (9 & 10) When will I be able to return to work/driving? Most patients return to working (median of 16 [ACDF] and 14 days [CDR]) and driving (median of 16 [ACDF] and 12 days [CDR]). CONCLUSIONS The answers to the FAQs can assist surgeons in evidence-based patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas Subramanian
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY (Subramanian, Kaidi, Shahi, Asada, Hirase, Vaishnav, Maayan, Amen, Araghi, Simon, Mai, Tuma, Eun Kim, Singh, Korsun, Zhang, Allen, Kim, Sheha, Dowdell, Qureshi, and Iyer), and the Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (Subramanian, Mai, Eun Kim, Qureshi, and Iyer)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mai E, Kim E, Kaidi A, Subramanian T, Simon CZ, Asada T, Kwas C, Zhang J, Araghi K, Singh N, Tuma O, Korsun M, Allen M, Heuer A, Sheha ED, Dowdell J, Huang RC, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00648. [PMID: 38679871 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000005020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of preoperative symptom duration on postoperative functional outcomes following cervical disc replacement (CDR) for radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA CDR has emerged as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathologies. The relationship between preoperative symptom duration and outcomes following CDR is not well established. METHODS Patients with radiculopathy without myelopathy who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDRs were included and divided into shorter (<6 mo) and prolonged (≥6 mo) cohorts based on preoperative symptom duration. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Neck and Arm. Change in PROM scores and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Analyses were conducted on the early (within 3 mo) and late (6 mo-2 y) postoperative periods. RESULTS A total of 201 patients (43.6±8.7 y, 33.3% female) were included. In both early and late postoperative periods, the shorter preoperative symptom duration cohort experienced significantly greater change from preoperative PROM scores compared to the prolonged symptom duration cohort for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm. The shorter symptom duration cohort achieved MCID in the early postoperative period at a significantly higher rate for NDI (78.9% vs. 54.9%, P=0.001), VAS-Neck (87.0% vs. 56.0%, P<0.001), and VAS-Arm (90.5% vs. 70.7%, P=0.002). Prolonged preoperative symptom duration (≥6 mo) was identified as an independent risk factor for failure to achieve MCID at the latest timepoint for NDI (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9, P=0.016), VAS-Neck (OR: 9.8, 95% CI: 3.7-26.0, P<0.001), and VAS-Arm (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 2.5-22.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates improved patient-reported outcomes for those with shorter preoperative symptom duration undergoing CDR for radiculopathy, suggesting delayed surgical intervention may result in poorer outcomes and greater postoperative disability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Mai
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Austin Kaidi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Cole Kwas
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Joshua Zhang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Olivia Tuma
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Maximilian Korsun
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Myles Allen
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Annika Heuer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Russel C Huang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Todd J Albert
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maayan O, Shahi P, Merrill RK, Pajak A, Lu AZ, Oquendo Y, Subramanian T, Araghi K, Tuma OC, Korsun MK, Asada T, Singh N, Singh S, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Ninety Percent of Patients Are Satisfied With Their Decision to Undergo Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:561-568. [PMID: 38533908 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey and retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To explore how patients perceive their decision to pursue spine surgery for degenerative conditions and evaluate factors correlated with decisional regret. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Prior research shows that one-in-five older adults regret their decision to undergo spinal deformity surgery. However, no studies have investigated decisional regret in patients with degenerative conditions. METHODS Patients who underwent cervical or lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions (decompression, fusion, or disk replacement) between April 2017 and December 2020 were included. The Ottawa Decisional Regret Questionnaire was implemented to assess prevalence of decisional regret. Questionnaire scores were used to categorize patients into low (<40) or medium/high (≥40) decisional regret cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back/Leg/Arm, and Neck Disability Index at preoperative, early postoperative (<6 mo), and late postoperative (≥6 mo) timepoints. Differences in demographics, operative variables, and PROMs between low and medium/high decisional regret groups were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 295 patients were included (mean follow-up: 18.2 mo). Overall, 92% of patients agreed that having surgery was the right decision, and 90% would make the same decision again. In contrast, 6% of patients regretted the decision to undergo surgery, and 7% noted that surgery caused them harm. In-hospital complications (P=0.02) and revision fusion (P=0.026) were significantly associated with higher regret. The medium/high decisional regret group also exhibited significantly worse PROMs at long-term follow-up for all metrics except VAS-Arm, and worse achievement of minimum clinically important difference for Oswestry Disability Index (P=0.007), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (P<0.0001), and VAS-Leg (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Higher decisional regret was encountered in the setting of need for revision fusion, increased in-hospital complications, and worse PROMs. However, 90% of patients overall were satisfied with their decision to undergo spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Current tools for assessing patient improvement postoperatively may not adequately capture the psychosocial values and patient expectations implicated in decisional regret.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | - Amy Z Lu
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Asada T, Simon CZ, Singh N, Tuma O, Subramanian T, Araghi K, Lu AZ, Mai E, Kim YE, Allen MRJ, Korsun M, Zhang J, Kwas C, Singh S, Dowdell J, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Limited Improvement with Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression Alone for Degenerative Scoliosis with Cobb Angle over 20 Degrees: The Impact of Decompression Location. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00601. [PMID: 38375684 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multi-surgeon registry. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive (MI) decompression in patients with severe degenerative scoliosis (DS) and identify factors associated with poorer outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND CONTEXT MI decompression has gained widespread acceptance as a treatment option for patients with lumbar canal stenosis and DS. However, there is a lack of research regarding the clinical outcomes and the impact of MI decompression location in patients with severe DS exhibiting a Cobb angle exceeding 20 degrees. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent MI decompression alone were included and categorized into the DS or control groups based on Cobb angle (>20 degrees). Decompression location was labeled as "scoliosis-related" when the decompression levels were across or between end vertebrae, and "outside" when the operative levels did not include the end vertebrae. The outcomes including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were compared between the propensity score-matched groups for improvement and minimal clinical importance difference (MCID) achievement at ≥1 year postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify factors contributing to the non-achievement of MCID in ODI of the DS group at the ≥1 year timepoint. RESULTS A total of 253 patients (41 DS) were included in the study. Following matching for age, gender, osteoporosis status, psoas muscle area, and preoperative ODI, the DS groups exhibited a significantly lower rate of MCID achievement in ODI (DS: 45.5% vs. control 69.0%, P=0.047). The "scoliosis-related" decompression (Odds ratio: 9.9, P=0.028) was an independent factor of non-achievement of MCID in ODI within the DS group. CONCLUSION In patients with a Cobb angle>20 degrees, lumbar decompression surgery, even in the MI approach, may result in limited improvement of disability and physical function. Caution should be exercised when determining a surgical plan, especially when decompression involves the level between or across the end vertebrae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Asada
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
- University of Tsukuba, Institute of Medicine, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivia Tuma
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Z Lu
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yeo Eun Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Myles R J Allen
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Joshua Zhang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cole Kwas
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Subramanian T, Akosman I, Amen TB, Pajak A, Kumar N, Kaidi A, Araghi K, Shahi P, Asada T, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Comparison of the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Lumbar Fusion : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:269-277. [PMID: 37767789 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to synthesize the early data regarding and analyze the safety profile of outpatient lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Performing lumbar fusion in an outpatient or ambulatory setting is becoming an increasingly employed strategy to provide effective value-based care. As this is an emerging option for surgeons to employ in their practices, the data is still in its infancy. METHODS This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that described outcomes of inpatient and outpatient lumbar fusion cohorts were searched from PubMed, Medline, The Cochrane Library, and Embase. Rates of individual medical and surgical complications, readmission, and reoperation were collected when applicable. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were additionally collected if reported. Individual pooled comparative meta-analysis was performed for outcomes of medical complications, surgical complications, readmission, and reoperation. PROMs were reviewed and qualitatively reported. RESULTS The search yielded 14 publications that compared outpatient and inpatient cohorts with a total of 75,627 patients. Odds of readmission demonstrated no significant difference between outpatient and inpatient cohorts [OR=0.94 (0.81-1.11)]. Revision surgery similarly was no different between the cohorts [OR=0.81 (0.57-1.15)]. Pooled medical and surgical complications demonstrated significantly decreased odds for outpatient cohorts compared with inpatient cohorts [OR=0.58 (0.34-0.50), OR=0.41 (0.50-0.68), respectively]. PROM measures were largely the same between the cohorts when reported, with few studies showing better ODI and VAS Leg outcomes among outpatient cohorts compared with inpatient cohorts. CONCLUSION Preliminary data regarding the safety of outpatient lumbar fusion demonstrates a favorable safety profile in appropriately selected patients, with PROMs remaining comparable in this setting. There is no data in the form of prospective and randomized trials which is necessary to definitively change practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Izzet Akosman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Troy B Amen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Anthony Pajak
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Austin Kaidi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao E, Shinn DJ, Basilious M, Subramanian T, Shahi P, Amen TB, Maayan O, Dalal S, Araghi K, Song J, Sheha ED, E Dowdell J, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Early Postoperative Outcomes After Cervical Disk Replacement: A Propensity-matched Analysis. Clin Spine Surg 2024:01933606-990000000-00257. [PMID: 38321612 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To compare the demographics, perioperative variables, and complication rates following cervical disk replacement (CDR) among patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The prevalence of MetS-involving concurrent obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia-has increased in the United States over the last 2 decades. Little is known about the impact of MetS on early postoperative outcomes and complications following CDR. METHODS The 2005-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for patients who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDR. Patients with and without MetS were divided into 2 cohorts. MetS was defined, according to other National Surgical Quality Improvement Program studies, as concurrent diabetes mellitus, hypertension requiring medication, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. Rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, complications, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition were compared using χ2 and Fisher exact tests. One to 2 propensity-matching was performed, matching for demographics, comorbidities, and number of operative levels. RESULTS A total of 5395 patients were included for unmatched analysis. Two hundred thirty-six had MetS, and 5159 did not. The MetS cohort had greater rates of 30-day readmission (2.5% vs. 0.9%; P=0.023), morbidity (2.5% vs. 0.9%; P=0.032), nonhome discharges (3% vs. 0.6%; P=0.002), and longer hospital stays (1.35±4.04 vs. 1±1.48 days; P=0.029). After propensity-matching, 699 patients were included. All differences reported above lost significance (P>0.05) except for 30-day morbidity (superficial wound infections), which remained higher for the MetS cohort (2.5% vs. 0.4%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS We identified MetS as an independent predictor of 30-day morbidity in the form of superficial wound infections following single-level CDR. Although MetS patients experienced greater rates of 30-day readmission, nonhome discharge, and longer lengths of stay, MetS did not independently predict these outcomes after controlling for baseline differences in patient characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Zhao
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Daniel J Shinn
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bovonratwet P, Chen AZ, Song J, Morse KW, Shafi KA, Amen TB, Dowdell JE, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Telemedicine in Spine Patients: Utilization and Satisfaction Remain High Even After Easing of COVID-19 Lockdown Restrictions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:208-213. [PMID: 36856548 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objectives of the present study were to (1) define telemedicine utilization rates during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period and (2) determine patient satisfaction with telemedicine during and after the initial height of the COVID-19 lockdown period for spine patients at an orthopedic specialty hospital. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous studies have shown high patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the initial height of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there exists limited data about spine telemedicine utilization and patient satisfaction after the reopening of in-person office visits and the easing of restrictions on elective surgical care. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who had an in-person or telemedicine visit at an urban tertiary specialty hospital from April 1, 2020 to April 15, 2021 were identified. Rates of overall telemedicine utilization over time were delineated. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine, as assessed through a series of questionnaires, was also evaluated over time. RESULTS Overall, 60,368 patients were identified. Of these, 19,568 patients (32.4%) had telemedicine visit. During the peak initial coronavirus lockdown period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization, on average, was greater than 90%. After the peak period, the rate of overall telemedicine utilization on average was at ~29% of all visits per month. The percentage of patients who would have been definitely comfortable if the telemedicine visit had been in-person increased over the entire study period ( P <0.001). Despite this, patient satisfaction based on survey responses remained statistically similar throughout the study period ( P >0.05). CONCLUSION The rate of telemedicine utilization in spine patients remains high, at ~one-third of all visits, even after the initial peak coronavirus lockdown period. In addition, patient satisfaction with telemedicine remained consistent throughout the study period, regardless of pandemic restrictions on in-person visits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rucker S, Singh N, Mai E, Asada T, Shahi P, Mercado K, Leung D, Iyer S, Emerson R, Qureshi SA. Feasibility of Saphenous Nerve Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Intraoperative Monitoring during Lumbar Spine Surgery: Early Results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00572. [PMID: 38273786 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. OBJECTIVE Assess the feasibility of saphenous nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SN-SSEP) monitoring in lumbar spine surgeries. BACKGROUND CONTEXT SN-SSEPs have been proposed for detecting lumbar plexus and femoral nerve injury during lateral lumbar surgery where tibial nerve (TN)SSEPs alone are insufficient. SN-SSEPs may also be useful in other types of lumbar surgery, as stimulation of SN below the knee derives solely from the L4 root and provides a means of L4 monitoring, whereas TN-SSEPs often do not detect single nerve root injury. The feasibility of routine SN-SSEP monitoring has not been established. METHODS A total of 563 consecutive cases using both TN and SN-SSEP monitoring were included. Anesthesia was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist, using an inhalant in 97.7% of procedures. SN stimulation was performed using 13 mm needle electrodes placed below the knee using 200-400 μsec pulses at 15-100 mA. Adjustments to stimulation parameters were made by the neurophysiology technician while obtaining baselines. Data were graded retrospectively for monitorability and cortical response amplitudes were measured by two independent reviewers. RESULTS 98% of TN-SSEPs and 92.5% of SN-SSEPs were monitorable at baseline, with a mean response amplitude of 1.35 μV for TN-SSEPs and 0.71 μV for SN-SSEPs. A significant difference between the stimulation parameters used to obtain reproducible TN and SN-SSEPs at baseline was observed, with SN-SSEPs requiring greater stimulation intensities. Body mass index (BMI) is not associated with baseline monitorability. Out of 20 signal changes observed, 11 involved SN while TN-SSEPs were unaffected. CONCLUSION With adjustments to stimulation parameters, SN-SSEP monitoring is feasible within a large clinical cohort without modifications to the anesthetic plan. Incorporating SN into standard intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) protocols for lumbar spine procedures may expand the role of SSEP monitoring to include detecting injury to the lumbar plexus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney Rucker
- Department of Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristin Mercado
- Department of Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dora Leung
- Department of Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald Emerson
- Department of Neurology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Asada T, Singh S, Maayan O, Shahi P, Singh N, Subramanian T, Araghi K, Korsun M, Tuma O, Pajak A, Lu A, Mai E, Kim YE, Dowdell J, Sheha ED, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Impact of Frailty and Cervical Radiographic Parameters on Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:81-89. [PMID: 37661809 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry. OBJECTIVE The purpose of the present study was to investigate the impact of frailty and radiographical parameters on postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is a growing body of literature indicating an association between frailty and increased postoperative complications following various surgeries. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between frailty and postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology were included. Frailty and dysphagia were assessed by the modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11) and Eat Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10), respectively. We also collected clinical demographics and cervical alignment parameters previously reported as risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the odds ratio (OR) of postoperative dysphagia at early (2-6 weeks) and late postoperative time points (1-2 years). RESULTS Ninety-five patients who underwent ACSS were included in the study. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 31 patients (32.6%) at the early postoperative time point. Multivariable logistic regression identified higher mFI-11 score (OR, 4.03; 95% CI: 1.24-13.16; P =0.021), overcorrection of TS-CL after surgery (TS-CL, T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis; OR, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95; P =0.003), and surgery at C3/C4 (OR, 12.38; 95% CI: 1.41-108.92; P =0.023) as factors associated with postoperative dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS Frailty, as assessed by the mFI-11, was significantly associated with postoperative dysphagia after ACSS. Additional factors associated with postoperative dysphagia were overcorrection of TS-CL and surgery at C3/C4. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing frailty and cervical alignment in the decision-making process preceding ACSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Maximilian Korsun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Olivia Tuma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Anthony Pajak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Amy Lu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Eric Mai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Yeo Eun Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wetmore DS, Dalal S, Shinn D, Shahi P, Vaishnav A, Chandra A, Melissaridou D, Beckman J, Albert TJ, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Erector Spinae Plane Block Reduces Immediate Postoperative Pain and Opioid Demand After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:7-14. [PMID: 36940258 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Matched cohort comparison. OBJECTIVE To determine perioperative outcomes of erector spinae plane (ESP) block for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is a paucity of data on the impact of lumbar ESP block on perioperative outcomes and its safety in MI-TLIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent 1-level MI-TLIF and received the ESP block (group E ) were included. An age and sex-matched control group was selected from a historical cohort that received the standard-of-care (group NE). The primary outcome of this study was 24-hour opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes were pain severity measured by a numeric rating scale, opioid-related side effects, and hospital length of stay. Outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Ninety-eight and 55 patients were included in the E and NE groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in patient demographics. Group E had lower 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption ( P = 0.117, not significant), reduced opioid consumption on a postoperative day (POD) 0 ( P = 0.016), and lower first pain scores postsurgery ( P < 0.001). Group E had lower intraoperative opioid requirements ( P < 0.001), and significantly lower average numeric rating scale pain scores on POD 0 ( P = 0.034). Group E reported fewer opioid-related side effects as compared with group NE, although this was not statistically significant. The average highest postoperative pain score within 3 hours postprocedurally was 6.9 and 7.7 in the E and NE cohorts, respectively ( P = 0.029). The median length of stay was comparable between groups with the majority of patients in both groups being discharged on POD 1. CONCLUSIONS In our retrospective matched cohort, ESP blocks resulted in reduced opioid consumption and decreased pain scores on POD 0 in patients undergoing MI-TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Shinn
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shahi P, Subramanian T, Singh S, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Perception of Robotics and Navigation by Spine Fellows and Early Attendings: The Impact of These Technologies on Their Training and Practice. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e330-e338. [PMID: 37839568 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is scant data on the role that robotics and navigation play in spine surgery training and practice of early attendings. This study aimed to assess the impact of navigation and robotics on spine surgery training and practice. METHODS A survey gathering information on utilization of navigation and robotics in training and practice was administered to trainees and early attendings. RESULTS A total of 51 surveys were returned completed: 71% were attendings (average practice years: 2), 29% were trainees. During training, 22% were exposed to only fluoroscopy, 75% were exposed to navigation, 51% were exposed to robotics, and 40% were exposed to both navigation and robotics. In our sample, 87% and 61% of respondents who had exposure to navigation and robotics, respectively, felt that it had a positive impact on their training. In practice, 28% utilized only fluoroscopy, 69% utilized navigation, 30% utilized robotics, and 28% utilized both navigation and robotics. The top 3 reasons behind positive impact on training and practice were: 1) increased screw accuracy, 2) exposure to upcoming technology, and 3) less radiation exposure. The top 3 reasons behind negative impact were: 1) compromises training to independently place screws, 2) time and personnel requirements, and 3) concerns about availing it in practice. In sum, 76% of attendings felt that they will be utilizing more navigation and robotics in 5 years' time. CONCLUSIONS Navigation and robotics have a perceivably positive impact on training and are increasingly being incorporated into practice. However, associated concerns demand spine surgeons to be thoughtful about how they integrate these technologies moving forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bovonratwet P, Vaishnav AS, Mok JK, Urakawa H, Dupont M, Melissaridou D, Shahi P, Song J, Shinn DJ, Dalal SS, Araghi K, Sheha ED, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function With Postoperative Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Global Spine J 2024; 14:225-234. [PMID: 35623628 PMCID: PMC10676173 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221103497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To determine association between preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores with postoperative pain, narcotics consumption, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following single-level lumbar microdiscectomy. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy were identified from May 2017-May 2020. Patients were grouped by their preoperative PROMIS-PF scores: mild disability (score≥40), moderate disability (score 30-39.9), and severe disability (score<30). Preoperative PROMIS-PF subgroups were tested for association with inpatient postoperative pain, total inpatient narcotics consumption, time to narcotic use cessation as well as improvements in postoperative PROMIS-PF, ODI, VAS-Leg Pain, VAS-Back Pain, SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) at 2-, 6-, 12-weeks, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year follow-up. RESULTS A total of 127 patients were included. Patients with greater disability reported higher inpatient maximum Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (P = .023) and total inpatient narcotics consumption (P = .008) but no difference in time to narcotic cessation after surgery (P = .373). However, patients with greater preoperative disability also demonstrated greater improvement from baseline in PROMIS-PF, ODI, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at 2-week follow-up (P < .05). These higher improvements from baseline for patients with greater preoperative disability were sustained for PROMIS-PF, ODI, and VAS-Leg Pain at 2-year follow-up (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with greater preoperative disability, as measured by PROMIS-PF, had increased inpatient postoperative pain and narcotics consumption, but also higher improvement from baseline in long-term PROMs. This data can be utilized for patient counseling and setting expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patawut Bovonratwet
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avani S. Vaishnav
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung K. Mok
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hikari Urakawa
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcel Dupont
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J. Shinn
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sidhant S. Dalal
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan D. Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine H. Gang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Asada T, Simon CZ, Lu AZ, Adida S, Dupont M, Parel PM, Zhang J, Bhargava S, Morse KW, Dowdell JE, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching. Spine J 2024; 24:118-124. [PMID: 37704046 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Navigation and robotic technologies have emerged as an alternative option to conventional freehand techniques for pedicle screw insertion. However, the effectiveness of these technologies in reducing the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery remains limited due to the small cohort size in the existing literature. PURPOSE To investigate whether utilization of robotically navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce the perioperative complications of spinal fusion surgery-including reoperations-with a sizeable cohort. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion surgery between 2019 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES Perioperative complications including readmission, reoperation, its reasons, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. METHODS Patients' data were collected including age, sex, race, body mass index, upper-instrumented vertebra, lower-instrumented vertebra, number of screws inserted, and primary procedure name. Patients were classified into the following two groups: freehand group and robot group. The variable-ratio greedy matching was utilized to create the matched cohorts by propensity score and compared the outcomes between the two group. RESULTS A total of 1,633 patients who underwent primary instrumented spinal lumbar fusion surgery were initially identified (freehand 1,286; robot 347). After variable ratio matching was performed with age, sex, body mass index, fused levels, and upper instrumented vertebrae level, 694 patients in the freehand group and 347 patients in robot groups were selected. The robot group showed less estimated blood loss (418.9±398.9 vs 199.2±239.6 ml; p<.001), shorter LOS (4.1±3.1 vs 3.2±3.0 days; p<.001) and similar operative time (212.5 vs 222.0 minutes; p=.151). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in readmission rate (3.6% vs 2.6%; p=.498), reoperation rate (3.2% vs 2.6%; p=.498), and screw malposition requiring reoperation (five cases, 0.7% vs one case, 0.3%; p=1.000). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative complications requiring readmission and reoperation were similar between fluoroscopy guided freehand and robotic surgery. Robot-guided pedicle screw insertion can enhance surgical efficiency by reducing intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay without extending operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Asada
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Amy Z Lu
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Samuel Adida
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Marcel Dupont
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Philip M Parel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Joshua Zhang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Satyaj Bhargava
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Kyle W Morse
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James E Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Subramanian T, Shinn DJ, Korsun MK, Shahi P, Asada T, Amen TB, Maayan O, Singh S, Araghi K, Tuma OC, Singh N, Simon CZ, Zhang J, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Huang RC, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Recovery Kinetics After Cervical Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1709-1716. [PMID: 37728119 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry. OBJECTIVE To study recovery kinetics and associated factors after cervical spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Few studies have described return to activities cervical spine surgery. This is a big gap in the literature, as preoperative counseling and expectations before surgery are important. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) were included. Data collected included preoperative patient-reported outcome measures, return to driving, return to working, and discontinuation of opioids data. A multivariable regression was conducted to identify the factors associated with return to driving by 15 days, return to working by 15 days, and discontinuing opioids by 30 days. RESULTS Seventy ACDF patients and 70 CDR patients were included. Overall, 98.2% of ACDF patients and 98% of CDR patients returned to driving in 16 and 12 days, respectively; 85.7% of ACDF patients and 90.9% of CDR patients returned to work in 16 and 14 days; and 98.3% of ACDF patients and 98.3% of CDR patients discontinued opioids in a median of seven and six days. Though not significant, minimal (odds ratio (OR)=1.65) and moderate (OR=1.79) disability was associated with greater odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Sedentary work (OR=0.8) and preoperative narcotics (OR=0.86) were associated with decreased odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Medium (OR=0.81) and heavy (OR=0.78) intensity occupations were associated with decreased odds of returning to work by 15 days. High school education (OR=0.75), sedentary work (OR=0.79), and retired/not working (OR=0.69) were all associated with decreased odds of discontinuing opioids by 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Recovery kinetics for ACDF and CDR are comparable. Most patients return to all activities after ACDF and CDR within 16 days. These findings serve as an important compass for preoperative counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Daniel J Shinn
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Maximilian K Korsun
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Troy B Amen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Olivia C Tuma
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Chad Z Simon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Joshua Zhang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Russel C Huang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mai E, Shahi P, Lee R, Shinn DJ, Vaishnav A, Araghi K, Singh N, Maayan O, Tuma OC, Pajak A, Asada T, Korsun MK, Singh S, Kim YE, Louie PK, Huang RC, Albert TJ, Dowdell J, Sheha ED, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference following cervical disc replacement. Spine J 2023; 23:1808-1816. [PMID: 37660897 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT While cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been emerging as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathology, not all patients undergoing CDR will achieve minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) postoperatively-risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in PROMs following CDR have not been established. PURPOSE To identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in Neck Disability Index (NDI, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm following primary 1- or 2-level CDRs in the early and late postoperative periods. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who had undergone primary 1- or 2-level CDR for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks between 2017 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported outcomes: Neck disability index (NDI), Visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm, MCID. METHODS Minimal clinically important difference achievement rates for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm within early (within 3 months) and late (6 months to 2 years) postoperative periods were assessed based on previously established thresholds. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed for each PROM and evaluation period, with failure to achieve MCID assigned as the outcome variable, to establish models to identify risk factors for failure to achieve MCID and predictors for achievement of MCID. Predictor variables included in the analyses featured demographics, comorbidities, diagnoses/symptoms, and perioperative characteristics. RESULTS A total of 154 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients achieved MCID for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm for both early and late postoperative periods-79% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the early postoperative period, while 80% achieved MCID for at least one of the PROMs in the late postoperative period. Predominant neck pain was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for NDI in the early (OR: 3.13 [1.10-8.87], p-value: .032) and late (OR: 5.01 [1.31-19.12], p-value: .018) postoperative periods, and VAS-Arm for the late postoperative period (OR: 36.63 [3.78-354.56], p-value: .002). Myelopathy was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the early postoperative period (OR: 3.40 [1.08-10.66], p-value: .036). Anxiety was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID for VAS-Neck in the late postoperative period (OR: 6.51 [1.91-22.18], p-value: .003). CDR at levels C5C7 was identified as a risk factor for failure to achieve MCID in NDI for the late postoperative period (OR: 9.74 [1.43-66.34], p-value: .020). CONCLUSIONS Our study identified several risk factors for failure to achieve MCID in common PROMs following CDR including predominant neck pain, myelopathy, anxiety, and CDR at levels C5-C7. These findings may help inform the approach to counseling patients on outcomes of CDR as the evidence suggests that those with the risk factors above may not improve as reliably after CDR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Mai
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Ryan Lee
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Daniel J Shinn
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Avani Vaishnav
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Olivia C Tuma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Anthony Pajak
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Maximilian K Korsun
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Yeo Eun Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Philip K Louie
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Russel C Huang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Subramanian T, Merrill RK, Shahi P, Pathania S, Araghi K, Maayan O, Zhao E, Shinn D, Kim YE, Kamil R, Song J, Dalal SS, Vaishnav AS, Othman Y, Steinhaus ME, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Predictors of Subsidence and its Clinical Impact After Expandable Cage Insertion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1670-1678. [PMID: 36940252 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected multisurgeon data. OBJECTIVE Examine the rate, clinical impact, and predictors of subsidence after expandable minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) cage. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Expandable cage technology has been adopted in MI-TLIF to reduce the risks and optimize outcomes. Although subsidence is of particular concern when using expandable technology as the force required to expand the cage can weaken the endplates, its rates, predictors, and outcomes lack evidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent 1 or 2-level MI-TLIF using expandable cages for degenerative lumbar conditions and had a follow-up of >1 year were included. Preoperative and immediate, early, and late postoperative radiographs were reviewed. Subsidence was determined if the average anterior/posterior disc height decreased by >25% compared with the immediate postoperative value. Patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed for differences at the early (<6 mo) and late (>6 mo) time points. Fusion was assessed by 1-year postoperative computed tomography. RESULTS One hundred forty-eight patients were included (mean age, 61 yr, 86% 1-level, 14% 2-level). Twenty-two (14.9%) demonstrated subsidence. Although statistically not significant, patients with subsidence were older, had lower bone mineral density, and had higher body mass index and comorbidity burden. Operative time was significantly higher ( P = 0.02) and implant width was lower ( P < 0.01) for subsided patients. Visual analog scale-leg was significantly lower for subsided patients compared with nonsubsided patients at a >6 months time point. Long-term (>6 mo) patient-acceptable symptom state achievement rate was lower for subsided patients (53% vs . 77%), although statistically not significant ( P = 0.065). No differences existed in complication, reoperation, or fusion rates. CONCLUSIONS Of the patients, 14.9% experienced subsidence predicted by narrower implants. Although subsidence did not have a significant impact on most patient-reported outcome measures and complication, reoperation, or fusion rates, patients had lower visual analog scale-leg and patient-acceptable symptom state achievement rates at the >6-month time point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Shane Pathania
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Eric Zhao
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Shinn
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yeo Eun Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - Junho Song
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Amen TB, Song J, Mai E, Rudisill SS, Bovonratwet P, Subramanian T, Kaidi AK, Maayan O, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Unplanned readmissions following ambulatory spine surgery: assessing common reasons and risk factors. Spine J 2023; 23:1848-1857. [PMID: 37716549 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although outpatient spine surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the United States, unplanned readmission following outpatient surgery remains a significant postoperative concern. PURPOSE This study aimed to (1) describe the incidence and timing of 30-day unplanned readmission after ambulatory lumbar and cervical spine surgery (2) evaluate the common reasons for readmission, and (3) identify factors associated with readmission in this population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES Hospital readmission within 30 postoperative days. METHODS Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Reasons for and timing of unplanned readmissions were recorded. Multivariable poisson regressions were employed to determine any independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS A total of 33,092 ambulatory cervical and 68,115 ambulatory lumbar spine surgery patients were identified. Incidences of 30-day readmission were 3.37% and 3.07% among cervical and lumbar patients, respectively. The most common surgical site-related reasons for readmission included uncontrolled pain, recurrence of disc herniation or major symptom, and postoperative hematoma/seroma. Common nonsurgical site-related reasons included gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular complications. Factors associated with readmission among cervical patients included age ≥55, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and steroid use, whereas factors associated with readmission following lumbar spine surgery included age ≥65, female sex, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, ASA ≥3, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and hypertension (p<.05 for all). CONCLUSION This study highlights the common reasons and factors associated with unplanned readmission following ambulatory spine surgery. Consideration of these factors may be critical to ensuring appropriate patient selection for ambulatory spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy B Amen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel S Rudisill
- Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Patawut Bovonratwet
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Austin K Kaidi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shahi P, Subramanian T, Maayan O, Araghi K, Singh N, Singh S, Asada T, Tuma O, Korsun M, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Preoperative Disability Influences Effectiveness of MCID and PASS in Predicting Patient Improvement Following Lumbar Spine Surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E506-E511. [PMID: 37651575 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Although minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) are utilized to interpret Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), it is unclear whether there is a clearly better metric between the two and if not, which metric should be utilized when. OBJECTIVE To compare the characteristics of MCID and PASS when interpreting ODI after lumbar spine surgery. METHODS Patients who underwent primary minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or decompression were included. The ODI and global rating change data at 1 year were analyzed. The global rating change was collapsed to a dichotomous outcome variable-(a) improved, (b) not improved The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of MCID and PASS were calculated for the overall cohort and separately for patients with minimal, moderate, and severe preoperative disability. Two groups with patients who achieved PASS but not MCID and patients who achieved MCID but not PASS were analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred twenty patients (mean age 62 y, 57% males) were included. PASS (86% vs. 69%) and MCID (88% vs. 63%) had significantly greater sensitivity in patients with moderate and severe preoperative disability, respectively. Nineteen percent of patients achieved PASS but not MCID and 10% of patients achieved MCID but not PASS, with the preoperative ODI being significantly greater in the latter. Most of these patients still reported improvement with no significant difference between the 2 groups (93% vs. 86%). CONCLUSION Significant postoperative clinical improvement is most effectively assessed by PASS in patients with minimal or moderate preoperative disability and by MCID in patients with severe preoperative disability. Adequate interpretation of ODI using the PASS and MCID metrics warrants individualized application as their utility is highly dependent on the degree of preoperative disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shahi P, Maayan O, Subramanian T, Singh N, Singh S, Araghi K, Tuma O, Asada T, Korsun M, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Preoperative Disability Influences Effectiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Predicting Patient Improvement Following Cervical Spine Surgery. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231215765. [PMID: 37984881 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231215765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To compare the characteristics of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) metrics when interpreting Neck Disability Index (NDI) following cervical spine surgery. METHODS Patients who underwent primary cervical fusion, discectomy, or laminectomy were included. NDI and global rating change (GRC) data at 6 months/1 year/2 years were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of MCID and PASS in predicting improvement on GRC were calculated for the overall cohort and separately for patients with minimal (NDI <30), moderate (NDI 30 - 49), and severe (NDI ≥ 50) preoperative disability. Two groups with patients who achieved PASS but not MCID and patients who achieved MCID but not PASS were analyzed. RESULTS 141 patients (206 responses) were included. PASS had significantly greater sensitivity for the overall cohort (85% vs 73% with MCID, P = .02) and patients with minimal disability (96% vs 53% with MCID, P < .001). MCID had greater sensitivity for patients with severe disability (78% vs 57% with PASS, P = .05). Sensitivity was not significantly different for PASS and MCID in patients with moderate preoperative disability (83% vs 92%, P = .1). 17% of patients achieved PASS but not MCID and 9% of patients achieved MCID but not PASS. Most of these patients still reported improvement with no significant difference between the 2 groups (89% vs 72%, P = .13). CONCLUSION PASS and MCID are better metrics for patients with minimal and severe preoperative disability, respectively. Both metrics are equally effective for patients with moderate preoperative disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Olivia Tuma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maximilian Korsun
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - James Dowdell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Song J, Shahsavarani S, Vatsia S, Katz AD, Ngan A, Fallon J, Strigenz A, Seitz M, Silber J, Essig D, Qureshi SA, Virk S. Association between history of lumbar spine surgery and paralumbar muscle health: a propensity score-matched analysis. Spine J 2023; 23:1659-1666. [PMID: 37437696 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Prior studies have suggested that muscle strength and quality may be associated with low back pain. Recently, a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lumbar muscle health grade was shown to correlate with health-related quality of life scores after spine surgery. However, the potential association between history of lumbar spine surgery and paralumbar muscle health requires further investigation. PURPOSE To compare MRI-based paralumbar muscle health parameters between patients with versus without a history of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal disease. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive series of patients who presented to the spine surgery clinic of a single surgeon. OUTCOME MEASURES MRI-based measurements of paralumbar cross-sectional area (PL-CSA), Goutallier grade, lumbar indentation value (LIV). METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of patients of a single surgeon, and patients were included based on availability of lumbar MRI. Axial T2-weighted lumbar MRIs were analyzed for PL-CSA, Goutallier classification, and LIV. Measurements were performed at the center of disc spaces from L1 to L5. Patients with and without history of spine surgery were matched based on age, sex, race, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) via propensity score matching. Normality of each muscle health variable was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Mann-Whitney U test or independent t-test performed to compare the matched cohorts, as appropriate. RESULTS A total of 615 patients were assessed. For final analysis, 89 patients with a history of previous spine surgery were matched with 89 patients without a history of spine surgery. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, race, ethnicity, or BMI between the matched cohorts. History of spine surgery was generally associated with worse lumbar muscle health. At all 4 intervertebral levels between L1-L5, PL-CSA was significantly smaller among patients with history of spine surgery. At L4-L5, patients with prior spine surgery had significantly smaller PL-CSA/BMI. Patients with prior spine surgery were found to have greater fatty infiltration of the muscles, with higher average Goutallier grades at levels L1-L2, L2-L3, and L4-L5. In addition, history of spine surgery was associated with smaller LIV at L1-L2, L3-L4, and L4-L5. CONCLUSIONS The current study demonstrates that history of lumbar spine surgery is associated with worse paralumbar muscle health based on quantitative and qualitative measurements on MRI. On average, patients with history of spine surgery were found to have smaller cross-sectional areas of the paralumbar muscles, greater amounts of fatty infiltration based on Goutallier classification, and smaller lumbar indentation values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junho Song
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | - Shaya Shahsavarani
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Sohrab Vatsia
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Austen D Katz
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Alex Ngan
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - John Fallon
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Adam Strigenz
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Mitchell Seitz
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Jeff Silber
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - David Essig
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sohrab Virk
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76(th) Avenue, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clohisy JCF, Maayan O, Asada T, Qureshi SA. Cervical Total Disc Replacement in Athletes: A Systematic Review. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:369-374. [PMID: 37735765 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes, and return to play after cervical total disc replacement (cTDR) in athletes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The role of cTDR in treating athletes with symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease is undefined. METHODS A systematic search using MEDLINE through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify all relevant literature. Data regarding study type, country in which the study was conducted, sample size, mean age, sex, type of sport, level of patient participation in sports, surgical indication, levels operated, type of implant, duration of follow-up, reoperations, surgical complications, extent of postoperative return to sports (RTSs), time to RTSs, and outcome notes were extracted from the included studies and analyzed. RESULTS Seven studies, including 4 case series and 3 case reports, and a total of 57 cTDR cases, were included. There was significant heterogeneity among the cTDR cases in terms of chosen sport and level of participation. Prestige LP was utilized in 51 out of 57 (89.5%) cases and 53 out of 57 (93%) cases were single-level. No reoperations were noted at a mean follow-up of 51.6 months. All patients returned to sports postoperatively. Return to training and competition occurred at a mean of 10.1 weeks and 30.7 weeks postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence regarding cTDR in athletes indicates that these patients RTSs at high rates, with return to training occurring around 10 weeks and return to competition occurring around 30 weeks. Clinical outcomes in these patients are like those reported for the general population. Low-level evidence, small numbers of cases, heterogeneity in chosen sport and participation level, and predominance of a single implant type limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the current literature on this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C F Clohisy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maayan O, Pajak A, Shahi P, Asada T, Subramanian T, Araghi K, Singh N, Korsun MK, Singh S, Tuma OC, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Learning Curve: A CuSum Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1508-1516. [PMID: 37235810 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To describe the learning curve for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and demonstrate its efficacy in treating lumbar disc herniation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The learning curve for PTED has not yet been standardized in the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent lumbar PTED by a single surgeon between December 2020 and 2022 were included. Cumulative sum analysis was applied to operative and fluoroscopy time to assess the learning curve. Inflection points were used to divide cases into early and late phases. The 2 phases were analyzed for differences in operative and fluoroscopy time, length of stay, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Patient characteristics and operative levels were also compared. PROMs entailed the Oswestry Disability Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg, and 12-item Short Form Survey at preoperative, early postoperative (<6 mo), and late postoperative (≥6 mo) time points. PROMs between PTED cases and a comparable cohort of tubular microdiscectomy cases, performed by the same surgeon, were compared. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were included. Cumulative sum analysis indicated that both operative and fluoroscopy time diminished rapidly after case 31, suggesting a learning curve of 31 cases (early phase: n = 31; late phase: n = 24). Late-phase cases exhibited significantly lower operative times (85.7 vs . 62.2 min, P = 0.001) and fluoroscopy times (131.0 vs . 97.2 s, P = 0.001) compared with the early-phase cases. Both early and late-phase cases showed significant improvement in all PROMs. There were no differences in PROMs between the patients who underwent PTED and tubular microdiscectomy. CONCLUSION The PTED learning curve was found to be 31 cases and did not impact PROMs or complication rates. Although this learning curve reflects the experiences of a single surgeon and may not be broadly applicable, PTED can serve as an effective modality for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omri Maayan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Anthony Pajak
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tomoyuki Asada
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Nishtha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Sumedha Singh
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Olivia C Tuma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Araghi K, Fourman MS, Merrill RK, Maayan O, Zhao E, Pajak A, Subramanian T, Kim DN, Kamil R, Shahi P, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Postoperative Radiculitis After L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1317-1325. [PMID: 37259185 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine postoperative radiculitis after isolated L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), determine which factors contribute to its development, and investigate the comparative outcomes of patients with versus without postoperative radiculitis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Both standalone and traditionalALIF are common and safe lumbar spine fusion techniques. Although optimal safety and effectiveness are achieved through appropriate patient selection, postoperative radiculitis after L5-S1 ALIF is a potential complication that seems to be the least predictable in the absence of iatrogenic injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS All adult patients (18-80 yr) with preoperative radiculopathies who underwent L5-S1 ALIF by 9 board-certified spine surgeons at a single academic institution from January 2016 to December 2021 with a minimum of 3 months follow-up were included. Patient records were assessed for data on clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome scores (patient-reported outcome measures). All patient records were evaluated to determine whether postoperative radiculitis developed. Radiographic measurements using x-rays were completed using all available pre and postoperative imaging. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed utilizing radiculitis as the dependent variable and various independent predictor variables. RESULTS One hundred forty patients were included, 48 (34%) patients developed postoperative radiculitis, with symptom onset and resolution occurring at 14.5 and 83 days, respectively. The two groups had no differences in preoperative or postoperative radiographic parameters. Multivariable regression showed 3 independent predictors of postoperative radiculitis: methylprednisolone use [OR: 6.032; (95% CI: 1.670-25.568)], increased implant height [OR: 1.509; (95% CI: 1.189-1.960)], and no posterior fixation [OR: 2.973; (95% CI: 1.353-0.806)]. CONCLUSIONS Of the 34% of patients who developed postoperative radiculitis after L5-S1 ALIF, it resolved on average within 3 months of surgery. These findings may help reduce the risk of undue short-term morbidity after isolated L5-S1 ALIF by informing preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Mitchell S Fourman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Spine Service, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Robert K Merrill
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Omri Maayan
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Eric Zhao
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Anthony Pajak
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - David N Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Robert Kamil
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Narrative review. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this review is to outline the role of sex hormones, particularly estrogen, in the pathogenesis of degenerative disc disease (DDD). METHODS A narrative review of studies discussing sex hormones and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration was conducted through a search of bibliographic databases to identify various mechanisms involved in effectuating DDD. RESULTS Estrogen-deficient states negatively impact various aspects of IVD function. These internal hormone environments reflect routine changes that commonly arise with physiologic aging and can compromise IVD structural integrity through a host of processes. Additionally, allosteric molecules such as micro-RNAs (mi-RNAs) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptors (GPER) antagonists can bind to estrogen receptors and inhibit protective downstream effects with estrogen receptor signaling. Furthermore, cursory studies have observed chondrogenic effects with testosterone supplementation, although the specific mechanism remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS Regulation of sex hormones, namely estrogen and testosterone, significantly impacts the structural integrity and function of IVDs. Uncovering underlying interactions driving these regulatory processes can facilitate development of novel, clinical therapies to treat DDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Shelby
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Emily S. Mills
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andy Ton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey C. Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Raymond J. Hah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ram K. Alluri
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Urakawa H, Sato K, Vaishnav AS, Lee R, Chaudhary C, Mok JK, Virk S, Sheha E, Katsuura Y, Kaito T, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Preoperative cross-sectional area of psoas muscle correlates with short-term functional outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery. Eur Spine J 2023; 32:2326-2335. [PMID: 37010611 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07533-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the optimal level for the measurement of psoas cross-sectional area and examine the correlation with short-term functional outcomes of posterior lumbar surgery. METHODS Patients who underwent minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery were included in this study. The cross-sectional area of psoas muscle was measured at each intervertebral level on T2-weighted axial images of preoperative MRI. Normalized total psoas area (NTPA) (mm2/m2) was calculated as total psoas area normalized to patient height. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated for the analysis of inter-rater reliability. Patient reported outcome measures including Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), short form health survey (SF-12) and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system were collected. A multivariate analysis was performed to elucidate independent predictors associated with failure to reach minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in each functional outcome at 6 months. RESULTS The total of 212 patients were included in this study. ICC was highest at L3/4 [0.992 (95% CI: 0.987-0.994)] compared to the other levels [L1/2 0.983 (0.973-0.989), L2/3 0.991 (0.986-0.994), L4/5 0.928 (0.893-0.952)]. Postoperative PROMs were significantly worse in patients with low NTPA. Low NTPA was an independent predictor of failure to reach MCID in ODI (OR = 2.68; 95% CI: 1.26-5.67; p = 0.010) and VAS leg (OR = 2.43; 95% CI: 1.13-5.20; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Decreased psoas cross-sectional area on preoperative MRI correlated with functional outcomes after posterior lumbar surgery. NTPA was highly reliable, especially at L3/4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hikari Urakawa
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Kosuke Sato
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Ryan Lee
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Chirag Chaudhary
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Jung Kee Mok
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Sohrab Virk
- North Shore University Hospital, 300 Community Dr, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 825 Northern Blvd, Great Neck, NY, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Takashi Kaito
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
- Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Araghi K, Subramanian T, Haque N, Merrill R, Amen TB, Shahi P, Singh S, Maayan O, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Provider Referral Patterns and Surgical Utilization Among New Patients Seen in Spine Clinic. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:885-891. [PMID: 37026719 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to elucidate the demographics of patient referrals from different sources and identify factors that affect a patient's likelihood of undergoing surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Despite baseline factors for surgical consideration, such as attempting conservative management, surgeons encounter many patients who are not surgically indicated. Overreferrals, that is, a patient referred to a surgeon that does not need surgery, can result in long wait times, delayed care, worse outcomes, and resource waste. MATERIALS AND METHODS All new patients at a single academic institution seen in the clinic by eight spine surgeons between January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2022, were analyzed. Referral types included self-referral, musculoskeletal (MSK), and non-MSK provider referral. Patient demographics included age, body mass index (BMI), zip code as a proxy for socioeconomic status, sex, insurance type, and surgical procedures undergone within 1.5 years postclinic visit. Analysis of variance and a Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare means among normally and non-normally disturbed referral groups, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions were run to assess demographic variables associated with undergoing surgery. RESULTS From 9356 patients, 84% (7834) were self-referred, 3% (319) were non-MSK, and 13% (1203) were MSK. A statistically significant association with ultimately undergoing surgery was observed with MSK referral type compared with non-MSK referral [odds ratio (OR)=1.37, CI: 1.04-1.82, P =0.0246]. Additional independent variables observed to be associated with patients undergoing surgery included older age (OR=1.004, CI: 1.002-1.007, P =0.0018), higher BMI (OR=1.02, CI: 1.011-1.029, P <0.0001), high-income quartile (OR=1.343, CI: 1.177-1.533, P <0.0001), and male sex (OR=1.189, CI: 1.085-1.302, P =0.0002). CONCLUSIONS A statistically significant association with undergoing surgery was observed with a referral by an MSK provider, older age, male sex, high BMI, and a high-income quartile home zip code. Understanding these factors and patterns is critical for optimizing practice efficiency and reducing the burdens of inappropriate referrals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tejas Subramanian
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shahi P, Maayan O, Shinn D, Dalal S, Song J, Araghi K, Melissaridou D, Vaishnav A, Shafi K, Pompeu Y, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws. Neurospine 2023; 20:577-586. [PMID: 37401076 PMCID: PMC10323346 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346070.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the usage of floor-mounted robot in minimally invasive lumbar fusion. METHODS Patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology using floor-mounted robot (ExcelsiusGPS) were included. Pedicle screw accuracy, proximal level violation rate, pedicle screw size, screw-related complications, and robot abandonment rate were analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included. Most surgeries were primary single-level fusion. Sixty-five percent of surgeries had intraoperative computed tomography (CT) workflow, 35% had preoperative CT workflow. Sixty-six percent were transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, 16% were lateral, 8% were anterior, and 10% were a combined approach. A total of 1,050 screws were placed with robotic assistance (85% in prone position, 15% in lateral position). Postoperative CT scan was available for 80 patients (419 screws). Overall pedicle screw accuracy rate was 96.4% (prone, 96.7%; lateral, 94.2%; primary, 96.7%; revision, 95.3%). Overall poor screw placement rate was 2.8% (prone, 2.7%; lateral, 3.8%; primary, 2.7%; revision, 3.5%). Overall proximal facet and endplate violation rates were 0.4% and 0.9%. Average diameter and length of pedicle screws were 7.1 mm and 47.7 mm. Screw revision had to be done for 1 screw (0.1%). Use of the robot had to be aborted in 2 cases (0.8%). CONCLUSION Usage of floor-mounted robotics for the placement of lumbar pedicle screws leads to excellent accuracy, large screw size, and negligible screw-related complications. It does so for screw placement in prone/lateral position and primary/revision surgery alike with negligible robot abandonment rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omri Maayan
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Junho Song
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Karim Shafi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuri Pompeu
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Manzur MK, Samuel AM, Vaishnav A, Gang CH, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA. Cervical Steroid Injections Are Not Effective for Prevention of Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1237-1242. [PMID: 34219493 PMCID: PMC10416602 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211024573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to determine how often patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and initially treated with cervical steroid injections (CSI) and to determine whether these injections provide any benefit in delaying ultimate surgical treatment. METHODS All patients with a new diagnosis of DCM, without previous cervical spine surgery or steroid injections, were identified in PearlDiver, a large insurance database. Steroid injection and surgery timing was identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Multivariate logistic regression identified associations with surgical treatment. RESULTS A total of 686 patients with DCM were identified. Pre-surgical cervical spine steroid injections were utilized in 244 patients (35.6%). All patients underwent eventual surgical treatment. Median time from initial DCM diagnosis to surgery was 75.5 days (mean 351.6 days; standard deviation 544.9 days). Cervical steroid injections were associated with higher odds of surgery within 1 year (compared to patients without injections, OR = 1.44, P < .001) and at each examined time point through 5 years (OR = 2.01, P < .001). In multivariate analysis comparing injection types, none of the 3 injection types were associated with decreased odds of surgery within 1 month of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS While cervical steroid injections continue to be commonly performed in patients with DCM, there is an overall increased odds of surgery after any type of cervical injection. Therefore injections should not be used to prevent surgical management of DCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustfa K. Manzur
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Evan D. Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dupont MM, Fourman MS, Iyer S, Qureshi SA, Sheha ED, Rhie-Lee J, Dowdell J. Impact of Lumbar Disk Herniation on Performance Outcomes and New Contracts in the National Football League. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E139-E144. [PMID: 36127776 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To determine performance outcomes and the contract-signing ability for the most recent cohort of professional football players treated for lumbar disk herniation (LDH). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA LDH can have a significant impact on the career of a National Football League (NFL) player. Previous studies have found favorable return to play (RTP) and performance outcomes for players with LDH, but the impact on the ability to sign new contracts (an important surrogate to assess continued success) has not previously been studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS NFL players treated for LDH from 2000 to 2020 were identified from a public records search. Age, position, type of treatment, and RTP measures were collected. Pro Football Focus (PFF) performance grade and contract values were compared before the injury and after treatment. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors associated with the ability to RTP and sign high-value contracts. RESULTS One hundred one players were treated for an LDH, of which 75 returned to play. Posttreatment performance as measured by PFF was similar to preinjury levels ( P =0.2). However, both total and guaranteed contract values were significantly reduced ( P <0.01). In multivariable analysis, both lower age and higher preinjury PFF grade were independent predictors of RTP and ability to sign a new contract. A preinjury contract that contained a high proportion of guaranteed money was found to be an independent predictor of the ability to sign a contract that was >20% guaranteed. CONCLUSION Although the majority of players were able to RTP at preserved performance levels following LDH treatment, their contract values were significantly reduced. RTP and contract-signing ability were not associated with the type of treatment, but rather baseline factors such as the player's age, performance, and preinjury compensation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | - James Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Silvestre J, Qureshi SA, Fossett D, Kang JD. Impact of Specialty on Cases Performed during Spine Surgery Training in the United States. World Neurosurg 2023:S1878-8750(23)00545-4. [PMID: 37087030 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Two general pathways exist for Spine Surgery training in the United States: Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery. Previous studies have not quantified the impact of fellowship training when comparing case volumes between these two training pathways. This study compares reported Spine Surgery case volume upon graduation from Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery training. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of recent graduates from Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery training programs in the United States (2018 to 2021). The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided case logs for residents in Neurological Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery as well as fellows in Orthopaedic Spine Surgery. Case volumes were compared for Adult and Pediatric Spine Surgery cases using parametric tests. RESULTS Case logs from 3,146 Orthopaedic Surgery residents, 107 Orthopaedic Spine Surgery fellows, and 766 Neurological Surgery residents were included in this study. Across each cohort, Neurological Surgery trainees reported more total Adult Spine Surgery cases than Orthopaedic Surgery trainees (514 ± 206 vs 383 ± 171, P<0.001). Orthopaedic Surgery trainees reported more total Pediatric Spine Surgery cases (21 ± 14 vs 17 ± 12, P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS Neurological Surgery training affords a greater volume of Adult Spine Surgery cases, but Orthopaedic Surgery affords more Pediatric Spine Surgery cases. Identification of relative strengths and weaknesses can help facilitate multi-disciplinary training experiences in Spine Surgery.
Collapse
|
32
|
Urakawa H, Sivaganesan A, Vaishnav AS, Sheha E, Qureshi SA. The Feasibility of 3D Intraoperative Navigation in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Perioperative Outcomes, Accuracy of Cage Placement and Radiation Exposure. Global Spine J 2023; 13:737-744. [PMID: 33906453 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211006700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To evaluate perioperative outcomes, accuracy of cage placement and radiation exposure in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) using 3D intraoperative navigation (ION), compared to conventional 2D fluoroscopy only. METHODS The perioperative outcomes and accuracy of cage placement were examined in all patients who underwent LLIF using ION (ION group) or fluoroscopy only (non-ION group) by a single surgeon. The radiation exposure was examined in patients who underwent stand-alone LLIF. RESULTS A total of 87 patients with 154 levels (ION 49 patients with 79 levels/ non-ION 38 patients with 75 levels) were included. There were no significant differences in operative time (ION 143.5 min vs. non-ION 126.0 min, P = .406), time from induction end to surgery start (ION 31.0 min vs. non-ION 31.0 min, P = .761), estimated blood loss (ION 37.5 ml vs. non-ION 50.0 ml, P = .351), perioperative complications (ION 16.3% vs. non-ION 7.9%, P = .335) and length of stay (ION 50.6 hours vs. non-ION 41.7 hours, P = .841). No significant difference was found in the accuracy of cage placement (P = .279). ION did not significantly increase total radiation dose (ION 51.0 mGy vs. non-ION 47.4 mGy, P = .237) and tended to reduce radiation dose during the procedure (ION 32.2 mGy vs. non-ION 47.4 mGy, P = .932). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative outcomes, accuracy of cage placement and radiation exposure in LLIF using ION were comparable to those using fluoroscopy only. The use of ION in LLIF was feasible, safe and accurate and may reduce radiation dose to the surgeon and surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Evan Sheha
- 25062Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- 25062Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Merrill RK, Clohisy JC, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA. Concepts and Techniques to Prevent Cervical Spine Deformity After Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Neurospine 2023; 20:221-230. [PMID: 37016868 PMCID: PMC10080418 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2244780.390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Adult cervical spine deformity is associated with decreased health-related quality of life, disability, and myelopathy. A number of radiographic parameters help to characterize cervical deformity and aid in the diagnosis and treatment. There are several etiologies for cervical spine deformity, the most common being iatrogenic. Additionally, spine surgery can accelerate adjacent segment degeneration which may lead to deformity. It is therefore important for all spine surgeons to be aware of the potential to cause iatrogenic cervical deformity. The aim of this review is to highlight concepts and techniques to prevent cervical deformity after spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K. Merrill
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - John C. Clohisy
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Todd J. Albert
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding Author Sheeraz A. Qureshi Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bovonratwet P, Vaishnav AS, Mok JK, Abdullah Z, Abdullah M, Sheha ED, McAnany SJ, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Patient-Reported Allergies Do Not Affect Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Spine Surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2023; 17:190-197. [PMID: 36963809 PMCID: PMC10165637 DOI: 10.14444/8420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A gap in the literature exists regarding the association between number of allergies and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing spine surgery. METHODS Consecutive cervical or lumbar spine surgery patients were identified from a prospective registry from April 2017 to July 2020. Patients were grouped into those with 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 allergies. Demographics were compared between the groups. PROMs included Neck Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS) neck pain, VAS arm pain, VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, short form 12 (SF-12) physical component score, SF-12 mental component score, and patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function (PROMIS-PF), and outcomes were compared between the groups through multivariable analysis at up to 1-year follow-up. Associations between number of allergies and achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the 9 aforementioned PROMs at 1-year follow-up were assessed. RESULTS This study included 148 cervical and 517 lumbar patients. After controlling for demographic differences, a higher number of allergies was associated with less improvement in VAS neck pain, SF-12 physical component score, and PROMIS-PF at 12 weeks following cervical surgery and less improvement in PROMIS-PF at 2 weeks following lumbar surgery (P < 0.05). However, these associations failed to persist after 6 months and 12 weeks following surgery in cervical and lumbar patients, respectively (P > 0.05). No association was identified between number of allergies and achievement of MCID in any of the 9 studied PROMs at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The higher number of allergies was associated with less improvement in PROMs in the early postoperative period but not at longer-term follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These findings provide data that can be utilized while counseling patients and setting postoperative expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patawut Bovonratwet
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jung Kee Mok
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zamie Abdullah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahie Abdullah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven J McAnany
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine H Gang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bovonratwet P, Kulm S, Kolin DA, Song J, Morse KW, Cunningham ME, Albert TJ, Sandhu HS, Kim HJ, Iyer S, Elemento O, Qureshi SA. Identification of Novel Genetic Markers for the Risk of Spinal Pathologies: A Genome-Wide Association Study of 2 Biobanks. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023:00004623-990000000-00758. [PMID: 36927824 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.22.00872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identifying genetic risk factors for spinal disorders may lead to knowledge regarding underlying molecular mechanisms and the development of new treatments. METHODS Cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, degenerative disc disease, and pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion were identified from the UK Biobank. Controls were patients without the diagnosis. Whole-genome regressions were used to test for genetic variants potentially implicated in the occurrence of each phenotype. External validation was performed in FinnGen. RESULTS A total of 389,413 participants were identified from the UK Biobank. A locus on chromosome 2 spanning GFPT1, NFU1, AAK1, and LOC124906020 was implicated in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Two loci on chromosomes 2 and 12 spanning genes GFPT1, NFU1, and PDE3A were implicated in spinal stenosis. Three loci on chromosomes 6, 10, and 15 spanning genes CHST3, LOC102723493, and SMAD3 were implicated in degenerative disc disease. Finally, 2 novel loci on chromosomes 5 and 9, with the latter corresponding to the LOC105376270 gene, were implicated in pseudarthrosis. Some of these variants associated with spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease were also replicated in FinnGen. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed nucleotide variations in select genetic loci that were potentially implicated in 4 different spinal pathologies, providing potential insights into the pathological mechanisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Scott Kulm
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute of Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David A Kolin
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kyle W Morse
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute of Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bovonratwet P, Kapadia M, Chen AZ, Vaishnav AS, Song J, Sheha ED, Albert TJ, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. Opioid prescription trends after ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 2023; 23:448-456. [PMID: 36427653 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Opioid utilization has been well studied for inpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the amount and type of opioids prescribed following ambulatory ACDF and the associated risk of persistent use are largely unknown. PURPOSE To characterize opioid prescription filling following single-level ambulatory ACDF compared with inpatient procedures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Opioid-naive patients who underwent ambulatory (no overnight stay) or inpatient single-level ACDF from 2011 to 2019 were identified from a national insurance database. OUTCOME MEASURES Rate, amount, and type of perioperative opioid prescription. METHODS Opioid-naive patients who underwent ambulatory (no overnight stay) or inpatient single-level ACDF from 2011 to 2019 were identified from a national insurance database. Perioperative opioids were defined as opioid prescriptions 30 days before and 14 days after the procedure. Rate, amount, and type of opioid prescription were characterized. Multivariable analyses controlling for any differences in demographics and comorbidities between the two treatment groups were utilized to determine any association between surgical setting and persistent opioid use (defined as the patient still filling new opioid prescriptions >90 days postoperatively). RESULTS A total of 42,521 opioid-naive patients were identified, of which 2,850 were ambulatory and 39,671 were inpatient. Ambulatory ACDF was associated with slightly increased perioperative opioid prescription filling (52.7% vs 47.3% for inpatient procedures; p<.001). Among the 20,280 patients (47.7%) who filled perioperative opioid prescriptions, the average amount of opioids prescribed (in morphine milligram equivalents) was similar between ambulatory and inpatient procedures (550 vs 540, p=.413). There was no association between surgical setting and persistent opioid use in patients who filled a perioperative opioid prescription, even after controlling for comorbidities, (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15, p=.066). CONCLUSIONS Ambulatory ACDF patients who filled perioperative opioid prescriptions were prescribed a similar amount of opioids as those undergoing inpatient procedures. Further, ambulatory ACDF does not appear to be a risk factor for persistent opioid use. These findings are important for patient counseling as well as support the safety profile of this new surgical pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patawut Bovonratwet
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Milan Kapadia
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Aaron Z Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Todd J Albert
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Catherine H Gang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alluri RK, Vaishnav AS, Sivaganesan A, Ricci L, Sheha E, Qureshi SA. Multimodality Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of Alerts in 628 Patients. Global Spine J 2023; 13:466-471. [PMID: 33733881 PMCID: PMC9972257 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211000321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of private neuromonitoring databases. OBJECTIVES To review neuromonitoring alerts in a large series of patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and determine whether alerts occurred more frequently when more lumbar levels were accessed or more frequently at particular lumbar levels. METHODS Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) databases were reviewed and patients were identified undergoing LLIF between L1 and L5. All cases in which at least one IONM modality was used (motor evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), evoked electromyography (EMG)) were included in this study. The type of IONM used and incidence of alerts were collected from each IONM report and analyzed. The incidence of alerts for each IONM modality based on number of levels at which at LLIF was performed and the specific level an LLIF was performed were compared. RESULTS A total of 628 patients undergoing LLIF across 934 levels were reviewed. EMG was used in 611 (97%) cases, SSEP in 561 (89%), MEP in 144 (23%). The frequency of IONM alerts for EMG, SSEP and MEPs did not significantly increase as the number of LLIF levels accessed increased. No EMG, SSEP, or MEP alerts occurred at L1-L2. EMG alerts occurred in 2-5% of patients at L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 and did not significantly vary by level (P = .34). SSEP and MEP alerts occurred more frequently at L4-L5 versus L2-L3 and L3-L4 (P < .03). CONCLUSIONS IONM may provide the greatest utility at L4-L5, particularly MEPs, and may not be necessary for more cephalad LLIF procedures such as at L1-L2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Luke Ricci
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY,
USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY,
USA,Sheeraz A Qureshi, Hospital for Special Surgery,
535 E. 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sarmiento JM, Shahi P, Melissaridou D, Fourman MS, Araghi K, Qureshi SA. Step-by-step guide to robotic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Ann Transl Med 2023; 11:221. [PMID: 37007570 PMCID: PMC10061490 DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Robotics in spinal surgery offers a promising potential to refine and improve the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) technique. Suitable surgeons for this technique include those who are already familiar with robotic-guided lumbar pedicle screw placement and want to advance their skillset by incorporating posterior-based interbody fusion. We provide a step-by-step guide for robotic-guided MI-TLIF. The procedure is divided into 7 practical and detailed techniques. The steps in sequential order include: (I) planning trajectories for pedicle screws and the tubular retractor; (II) robotic-guided pedicle screw placement; (III) placement of tubular retractor; (IV) unilateral facetectomy using the surgical microscope; (V) discectomy & disc preparation; (VI) interbody implant insertion; and (VII) percutaneous rod placement. We standardize surgeon training in robotic MI-TLIF by teaching our spine surgery fellows these 7 key technical steps highlighted in this guide. Current-generation robotics offers integrated navigation capability, K-wireless placement of pedicle screws through a rigid robotic arm, compatibility with tubular retractor systems to perform facetectomy, and allows for placement of interbody devices. We have found robotic-guided MI-TLIF to be a safe procedure that allows for accurate and reliable pedicle screw placement, less collateral damage to the soft tissues of the low back, and decreased radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Manuel Sarmiento
- Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mitchell S Fourman
- Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shahi P, Dalal S, Shinn D, Song J, Araghi K, Melissaridou D, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Iyer S, Qureshi SA. Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups. Neurosurg Focus 2023; 54:E4. [PMID: 36587410 DOI: 10.3171/2022.10.focus22604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) in patients ≥ 70 years old and compare them to younger age groups. METHODS This was a retrospective study of data that were collected prospectively. Patients who underwent primary single-level MI-TLIF were included and divided into 3 groups: age < 60, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years. The outcome measures were as follows: 1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (i.e., visual analog scale [VAS] for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary [SF-12 PCS]); 2) minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement; 3) return to activities; 4) opioid discontinuation; 5) fusion rates; and 6) complications/reoperations. RESULTS A total of 147 patients (age < 60 years, 62; 60-69 years, 47; ≥ 70 years, 38) were included. All the groups showed significant improvements in all PROMs at the early (< 6 months) and late (≥ 6 months) time points and there was no significant difference between the groups. Although MCID achievement rates for VAS leg and ODI were similar, they were lower in the ≥ 70-year-old patient group for VAS back and SF-12 PCS. Although the time to MCID achievement for ODI and SF-12 PCS was similar, it was greater in the ≥ 70-year-old patient group for VAS back and leg. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of return to activities, opioid discontinuation, fusion rates, and complication/reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS Although patients > 70 years of age may be less likely and/or take longer to achieve MCID compared to their younger counterparts, they show an overall significant improvement in PROMs, a similar likelihood of returning to activities and discontinuing opioids, and comparable fusion and complication/reoperation rates following MI-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Sidhant Dalal
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Daniel Shinn
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Junho Song
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Kasra Araghi
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | | | - Evan Sheha
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - James Dowdell
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and.,2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- 1Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and.,2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Shahi P, Vaishnav AS, Mai E, Kim JH, Dalal S, Song J, Shinn DJ, Melissaridou D, Araghi K, Urakawa H, Sivaganesan A, Lafage V, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. Spine J 2023; 23:54-63. [PMID: 35843537 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Surgical counseling enables shared decision-making (SDM) by improving patients' understanding. PURPOSE To provide answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who underwent primary tubular minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery in form of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF), decompression alone, or microdiscectomy and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Surgical (radiation exposure and intraoperative complications) (2)Immediate postoperative (length of stay [LOS] and complications) (3) Clinical outcomes (Visual Analog Scale- back and leg, VAS; Oswestry Disability Index, ODI; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, PROMIS PF; Global Rating Change, GRC; return to activities; complications/reoperations) METHODS: The outcome measures were analyzed to provide answers to ten FAQs that were compiled based on the authors' experience and a review of literature. Changes in VAS back, VAS leg, ODI, and SF-12 PCS from preoperative values to the early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) postoperative time points were analyzed with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. % of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for these patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the two time points was evaluated. Changes in PROs from preoperative values too early (<6 months) and late (≥6 months) postoperative time points were analyzed within each of the three groups. Percentage of patients achieving MCID was also evaluated. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-six patients (104 TLIF, 147 decompression, 115 microdiscectomy) were included. The following FAQs were answered: (1) Will my back pain improve? Most patients report improvement by >50%. About 60% of TLIF, decompression, and microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID at ≥6 months. (2) Will my leg pain improve? Most patients report improvement by >50%. 56% of TLIF, 67% of decompression, and 70% of microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID at ≥6 months. (3) Will my activity level improve? Most patients report significant improvement. Sixty-six percent of TLIF, 55% of decompression, and 75% of microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID for SF-12 PCS. (4) Is there a chance I will get worse? Six percent after TLIF, 14% after decompression, and 5% after microdiscectomy. (5) Will I receive a significant amount of radiation? The radiation exposure is likely to be acceptable and nearly insignificant in terms of radiation-related risks. (6) What is the likelihood that I will have a complication? 17.3% (15.4% minor, 1.9% major) for TLIF, 10% (9.3% minor and 0.7% major) for decompression, and 1.7% (all minor) for microdiscectomy (7) Will I need another surgery? Six percent after TLIF, 16.3% after decompression, 13% after microdiscectomy. (8) How long will I stay in the hospital? Most patients get discharged on postoperative day one after TLIF and on the same day after decompression and microdiscectomy. (9) When will I be able to return to work? >80% of patients return to work (average: 25 days after TLIF, 14 days after decompression, 11 days after microdiscectomy). (10) Will I be able to drive again? >90% of patients return to driving (average: 22 days after TLIF, 11 days after decompression, 14 days after microdiscectomy). CONCLUSIONS These concise answers to the FAQs in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery can be used by physicians as a reference to enable patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA
| | - Jeong Hoon Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA
| | - Sidhant Dalal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Shinn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Dimitra Melissaridou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Hikari Urakawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahilan Sivaganesan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA.
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Song J, Katz AD, Qureshi SA, Virk SS, Sarwahi V, Silber J, Essig D. Lumbar fusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: greater rates of morbidity and longer procedures. J Spine Surg 2023; 9:73-82. [PMID: 37038422 PMCID: PMC10082429 DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has altered the standard of care for spine surgery in many ways. However, there is a lack of literature evaluating the potential changes in surgical outcomes and perioperative factors for spine procedures performed during the pandemic. In particular, no large database study evaluating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on spine surgery outcomes has yet been published. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perioperative factors and postoperative outcomes of lumbar fusion procedures. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, which was queried for all adult patients who underwent primary lumbar fusion in 2019 and 2020. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on 2019 (pre-pandemic) or 2020 (intra-pandemic) operation year. Differences in 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Differences in total relative value units (RVUs), RVUs per minute, and total operation time were evaluated using quantile (median) regression. Odds ratios (OR) for length of stay were estimated via negative binomial regression. Results A total of 27,446 patients were included in the analysis (12,473 cases in 2020). Unadjusted comparisons of outcomes revealed that lumbar fusions performed in 2020 were associated with higher rates of morbidity, pneumonia, bleeding transfusions, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and sepsis. 2020 operation year was also associated with longer length of hospital stay, less frequent non-home discharge, higher total RVUs, and higher RVUs per minute. After adjusting for baseline differences in regression analyses, the differences in bleeding transfusions, length of stay, and RVUs per minute were no longer statistically significant. However, operation year 2020 independently predicted morbidity, pneumonia, DVT, and sepsis. In terms of perioperative variables, operation year 2020 predicted greater operative time, non-home discharge, and total RVUs. Conclusions Lumbar fusion procedures performed amidst the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with poorer outcomes, including higher rates of morbidity, pneumonia, DVT, and sepsis. In addition, surgeries performed in 2020 were associated with longer operative times and less frequent non-home discharge disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junho Song
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Austen D. Katz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sohrab S. Virk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Vishal Sarwahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - Jeff Silber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - David Essig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Louie PK, Sheikh Alshabab B, McCarthy MH, Virk S, Dowdell JE, Steinhaus ME, Lovecchio F, Samuel AM, Morse KW, Schwab FJ, Albert TJ, Qureshi SA, Iyer S, Katsuura Y, Huang RC, Cunningham ME, Yao YC, Weissmann K, Lafage R, Lafage V, Kim HJ. Classification system for cervical spine deformity morphology: a validation study. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:865-873. [PMID: 35901688 DOI: 10.3171/2022.5.spine211537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to initially validate a recent morphological classification of cervical spine deformity pathology. METHODS The records of 10 patients for each of the 3 classification subgroups (flat neck, focal deformity, and cervicothoracic), as well as for 8 patients with coronal deformity only, were extracted from a prospective multicenter database of patients with cervical deformity (CD). A panel of 15 physicians of various training and professional levels (i.e., residents, fellows, and surgeons) categorized each patient into one of the 4 groups. The Fleiss kappa coefficient was utilized to evaluate intra- and interrater reliability. Accuracy, defined as properly selecting the main driver of deformity, was reported overall, by morphotype, and by reviewer experience. RESULTS The overall classification demonstrated a moderate to substantial agreement (round 1: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.563, 95% CI 0.559-0.568; round 2: interrater Fleiss kappa = 0.612, 95% CI 0.606-0.619). Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean interrater coefficients (residents 0.547, fellows 0.600, surgeons 0.524). The mean intrarater score was 0.686 (range 0.531-0.823). A substantial agreement between rounds 1 and 2 was demonstrated in 81.8% of the raters, with a kappa score > 0.61. Stratification by level of training demonstrated similar mean intrarater coefficients (residents 0.715, fellows 0.640, surgeons 0.682). Of 570 possible questions, reviewers provided 419 correct answers (73.5%). When considering the true answer as being selected by at least one of the two main drivers of deformity, the overall accuracy increased to 86.0%. CONCLUSIONS This initial validation of a CD morphological classification system reiterates the importance of dynamic plain radiographs for the evaluation of patients with CD. The overall reliability of this CD morphological classification has been demonstrated. The overall accuracy of the classification system was not impacted by rater experience, demonstrating its simplicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip K Louie
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neurosciences and Spine, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington
| | - Basel Sheikh Alshabab
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Michael H McCarthy
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana Spine Group, University of Indiana, Carmel, Indiana
| | - Sohrab Virk
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - James E Dowdell
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Michael E Steinhaus
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,5Spine Institute, MountainStar Healthcare, Murray, Utah
| | - Francis Lovecchio
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Andre M Samuel
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Kyle W Morse
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Todd J Albert
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Yoshihiro Katsuura
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,6Department of Orthopedics, Adventist Health, Willits, California
| | - Russel C Huang
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Matthew E Cunningham
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Yu-Cheng Yao
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,7Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; and
| | - Karen Weissmann
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,8Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Shahi P, Song J, Dalal S, Melissaridou D, Shinn DJ, Araghi K, Mai E, Sheha E, Dowdell J, Qureshi SA, Iyer S. Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 37:828-835. [PMID: 35901712 DOI: 10.3171/2022.5.spine22361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients ≥ 80 years of age and compare them with those of younger age groups. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent primary unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) (any number of levels) and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were included and divided into three groups by age: < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years. The outcome measures were 1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale [VAS] back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12] Physical Component Summary [PCS] and Mental Component Summary [MCS] scores, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function [PROMIS PF]); 2) percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the time taken to do so; and 3) complications and reoperations. Two postoperative time points were defined: early (< 6 months) and late (≥ 6 months). RESULTS A total of 345 patients (< 60 years: n = 94; 60-79 years: n = 208; ≥ 80 years: n = 43) were included in this study. The groups had significantly different average BMIs (least in patients aged ≥ 80 years), age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Indices (greatest in the ≥ 80-year age group), and operative times (greatest in 60- to 79-year age group). There was no difference in sex, number of operated levels, and estimated blood loss between groups. Compared with the preoperative values, the < 60-year and 60- to 79-year age groups showed a significant improvement in most PROMs at both the early and late time points. In contrast, the ≥ 80-year age group only showed significant improvement in PROMs at the late time point. Although there were significant differences between the groups in the magnitude of improvement (least improvement in ≥ 80-year age group) at the early time point in VAS back and leg, ODI, and SF-12 MCS, no significant difference was seen at the late time point except in ODI (least improvement in ≥ 80-year group). The overall MCID achievement rate decreased, moving from the < 60-year age group toward the ≥ 80-year age group at both the early (64% vs 51% vs 41% ) and late (72% vs 58% vs 52%) time points. The average time needed to achieve the MCID in pain and disability increased, moving from the < 60-year age group toward the ≥ 80-year age group (2 vs 3 vs 4 months). There was no significant difference seen between the groups in terms of complications and reoperations except in immediate postoperative complications (5.3% vs 4.8% vs 14%). CONCLUSIONS Although in this study minimally invasive decompression led to less and slower improvement in patients ≥ 80 years of age compared with their younger counterparts, there was significant improvement compared with the preoperative baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Junho Song
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Sidhant Dalal
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | | | - Daniel J Shinn
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Kasra Araghi
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Eric Mai
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Evan Sheha
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - James Dowdell
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and.,2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; and.,2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dalal SS, Dupree DA, Samuel AM, Vaishnav AS, Gang CH, Qureshi SA, Bumpass DB, Overley SC. Reoperations after primary and revision lumbar discectomy: study of a national-level cohort with eight years follow-up. Spine J 2022; 22:1983-1989. [PMID: 35724809 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Published rates for disc reherniation following primary discectomy are around 6%, but the ultimate reoperation outcomes in patients after receiving revision discectomy are not well understood. Additionally, any disparity in the outcomes of subsequent revision discectomy (SRD) versus subsequent lumbar fusion (SLF) following primary/revision discectomy remains poorly studied. PURPOSE To determine the 8-year SRD/SLF rates and time until SRD/SLF after primary/revision discectomy respectively. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients undergoing primary or revision discectomy, with records in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database from the years 2010 to 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES Subsequent surgery type and time to subsequent surgery. METHODS Patients were grouped into primary or revision discectomy cohorts based off of the nature of "index" procedure (primary or revision discectomy) using ICD9/10 and CPT procedure codes from 2010 to 19 insurance data sets in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database. Preoperative demographic data was collected. Outcome measures such as subsequent surgery type (fusion or discectomy) and time to subsequent surgery were collected prospectively in PearlDiver Mariner database. Statistical analysis was performed using BellWeather statistical software. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of time to SLF/SRD was performed on each cohort, and log-rank test was used to compare the rates of SLF/SRD between cohorts. RESULTS A total of 20,147 patients were identified (17,849 primary discectomy, 2,298 revision discectomy). The 8-year rates of SRD (6.1% in revision cohort, 4.8% in primary cohort, p<.01) and SLF (10.4% in revision cohort, 6.2% in primary cohort, p<.01) were higher after revision versus primary discectomy. Time to SLF was shorter after revision versus primary discectomy (709 vs. 886 days, p<.01). After both primary and revision discectomy, the 8-year rate of SLF (10.4% in revision cohort, 6.2% in primary cohort, p<.01) is greater than SRD (6.1% in revision cohort, 4.8% in primary cohort, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS Compared to primary discectomy, revision discectomy has higher rates of SLF (10.4% vs. 6.2%), and faster time to SLF (2.4 vs. 1.9 years) at 8-year follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidhant S Dalal
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Devin A Dupree
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Andre M Samuel
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - David B Bumpass
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Samuel C Overley
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shahi P, Qureshi SA. In Reply: Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Radiological Evaluation. Neurosurgery 2022; 91:e145-e146. [PMID: 36098521 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Song J, Araghi K, Dupont MM, Shahi P, Bovonratwet P, Shinn D, Dalal SS, Melissaridou D, Virk SS, Iyer S, Dowdell JE, Sheha ED, Qureshi SA. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results. Spine J 2022; 22:1677-1686. [PMID: 35671940 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Poor muscle health has been implicated as a source of back pain among patients with lumbar spine pathology. Recently, a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based lumbar muscle health grade was shown to correlate with health-related quality of life scores. However, the impact of muscle health on postoperative functional outcomes following spine surgery remains to be investigated. PURPOSE To determine whether muscle health grade measured by preoperative psoas and paralumbar muscle cross-sectional areas impact the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following lumbar microdiscectomy. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients who underwent 1-level lumbar microdiscectomy in a single institution between 2017 and 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES Rate of MCID achievement, time to MCID achievement, PROMs including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale for back pain (VAS back), VAS leg, Short Form 12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS), SF-12 Mental Component Summary (SF-12 MCS), and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function (PROMIS PF). METHODS Two previously validated methods for muscle health grading were applied. Axial T2 MRI were analyzed for muscle measurements. The psoas-based method utilized the normalized total psoas area (NTPA), which is the psoas cross-sectional area divided by the square of patient height (mm2/m2). Patients were divided into low and high NTPA groups based on sex-specific lowest quartile NTPA thresholds. The paralumbar-based method incorporated the paralumbar cross-sectional area normalized by body mass index (PL-CSA/BMI) and Goutallier classification. Score of 1 was added for either PL-CSA/BMI >130 or Goutallier class of ≤2. "Good" muscle health was defined as score of 2, and "poor" muscle health was defined as score of 0 to 1. Prospectively collected PROMs were analyzed at 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative timepoints. The rate of and time to MCID achievement were compared among the cohorts. Bivariate analyses were performed to assess for correlations between psoas/paralumbar cross-sectional areas and change in PROM scores from baseline. RESULTS The total cohort included 163 patients with minimum follow-up of 6 months and mean follow-up of 16.5 months. 40 patients (24.5%) were categorized into the low NTPA group, and 55 patients (33.7%) were categorized into the poor paralumbar muscle group. Low NTPA was associated with older age, lower BMI, and greater frequencies of Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥1. Poor paralumbar muscle health was associated with older age, female sex, higher BMI, and CCI ≥1. There were no differences in rates of MCID achievement for any PROMs between low versus high NTPA groups or between poor versus good paralumbar groups. Low NTPA was associated with longer time to MCID achievement for ODI, VAS back, VAS leg, and SF-12 MCS. Poor paralumbar muscle health was associated with longer time to MCID achievement for VAS back, VAS leg, and SF-12 PCS. NTPA negatively correlated with change in VAS back (6-week, 12-week) and VAS leg (6-month). PL-CSA/BMI positively correlated with change in PROMIS-PF at 3 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, patients with worse muscle health grades achieved MCID at similar rates but required longer time to achieve MCID. Lower NTPA was weakly correlated with larger improvements in pain scores. PL-CSA/BMI positively correlated with change in PROMIS-PF. Our findings suggest that with regards to functional outcomes, patients with worse muscle health may take longer to recuperate postoperatively compared to those with better muscle health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junho Song
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Marcel M Dupont
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Pratyush Shahi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | - Daniel Shinn
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sidhant S Dalal
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | | | - Sohrab S Virk
- Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, 270-05 76th Ave, Queens, NY 10040, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - James E Dowdell
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Song J, Katz A, Ngan A, Silber JS, Essig D, Qureshi SA, Virk S. Comparison of value per operative time between anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lumbar disc arthroplasty: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 2022; 13:427-431. [PMID: 36777911 PMCID: PMC9910134 DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_99_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Despite the growing evidence demonstrating its effectiveness, lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) rates have not increased significantly in recent years. A likely contributing factor is uncertainties related to reimbursement and insurers' denial of coverage due to fear of late complications, reoperations, and unknown secondary costs. However, no prior study has compared the physician reimbursement rates of lumbar fusion and LDA. Aim The aim of this study was to compare the relative value units (RVUs) per min as well as 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates between anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and LDA. Settings and Design This was a retrospective cohort study. Subjects and Methods The current study utilizes data obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients who underwent ALIF or LDA between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. Statistical Analysis Used Propensity score matching analysis was performed according to demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Matched groups were compared through Fisher's exact test and independent t-test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results Five hundred and two patients who underwent ALIF were matched with 591 patients who underwent LDA. Mean RVUs per min was significantly higher for ALIF compared to LDA. ALIF was associated with a significantly higher 30-day morbidity rate compared to LDA, while readmission and reoperation rates were statistically similar. ALIF was also associated with higher frequencies of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and blood transfusions. Conclusions ALIF is associated with significantly higher RVUs per min compared to LDA. ALIF is also associated with higher rates of 30-day morbidity, DVT, and blood transfusions, while readmission and reoperation rates were statistically similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junho Song
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Austen Katz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Alex Ngan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Jeff Scott Silber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - David Essig
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Sheeraz A. Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Sohrab Virk
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Alhammoud A, Dalal S, Sheha ED, Habibullah NK, Moghamis IS, Virk S, Gang CH, Qureshi SA. The Impact of Prior Bariatric Surgery on Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2022; 12:1872-1880. [PMID: 35057660 PMCID: PMC9609509 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211072492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS) prior to spine surgery. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines comparing the outcomes of spine surgery between subjects with prior bariatric surgery to those who were considered obese with no prior bariatric surgery. RESULTS A total of 183, 570 patients were included in the 4 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 52.9 years, and the majority were female (68%). The two groups consisted of a total of 36, 876 patients with prior BS and 146, 694 obese patients without prior BS. The overall rate of complications in the prior BS group was 6.4% (4.5%-38.7%) compared to 11.9% (11.2%-55.4%) in the non-prior BS obese group with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The prior BS group had lower rates of renal, neurological, and thromboembolic complications, with a lower mortality and readmission rate. In a subgroup undergoing cervical spine surgery, patients with prior BS had fewer cardiac, GI, and total complications. For patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery, patients with prior BS had fewer thromboembolic and total complications. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing bariatric surgery prior to spine surgery had fewer renal, neurological, and thromboembolic complications as well as a decreased mortality and readmission rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Evan D. Sheha
- Hospital for Special
Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Weill Cornell Medical
College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Sohrab Virk
- Hospital for Special
Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Hospital for Special
Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Weill Cornell Medical
College, New York, NY, USA,Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY,
USASheeraz A Qureshi, MD, MBA, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St.,
New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Shahi P, Vaishnav AS, Lee R, Mai E, Steinhaus ME, Huang R, Albert T, Iyer S, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Qureshi SA. Outcomes of cervical disc replacement in patients with neck pain greater than arm pain. Spine J 2022; 22:1481-1489. [PMID: 35405338 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is believed to positively impact a patient's radicular symptoms as well as axial neck pain, the outcomes of cervical disc replacement (CDR) with regards to neck pain specifically have not been established. PURPOSE Primary: to assess clinical improvement following CDR in patients with neck pain greater than arm pain. Secondary: to compare the clinical outcomes between patients undergoing CDR for predominant neck pain (pNP), predominant arm pain (pAP), and equal neck and arm pain (ENAP). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients who had undergone one- or two-level CDR for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology and had a minimum of 6-month follow-up were included and stratified into three cohorts based on their predominant location of pain: pNP, pAP, and ENAP. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient-reported outcomes: Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) neck and arm, Short Form 12-Item Physical Health Score (SF12-PHS), Short Form 12-Item Mental Health Score (SF12-MHS), minimal clinically important difference (MCID). METHODS Changes in Patient-reported outcomes from preoperative values to early (<6 months) and late (≥6 months) postoperative timepoints were analyzed within each of the three groups. The percentage of patients achieving MCID was also evaluated. RESULTS One hundred twenty-five patients (52 pNP, 30 pAP, 43 ENAP) were included. The pNP cohort demonstrated significant improvements in early and late NDI and VAS-Neck, early SF-12 MCS, and late SF-12 PCS. The pAP and ENAP cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in all PROMs, including NDI, VAS-Neck, VAS-Arm, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS, at both the early and late timepoints. No statistically significant differences were found in the MCID achievement rates for NDI, VAS-Neck, SF-12 PCS, and SF-12 MCS at the late timepoint amongst the three groups. CONCLUSIONS CDR leads to comparable improvement in neck pain and disability in patients presenting with neck pain greater than arm pain and meeting specific clinical and radiographic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ryan Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Mai
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael E Steinhaus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Russel Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Todd Albert
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shahi P, Vaishnav AS, Melissaridou D, Sivaganesan A, Sarmiento JM, Urakawa H, Araghi K, Shinn DJ, Song J, Dalal SS, Iyer S, Sheha ED, Dowdell JE, Qureshi SA. Factors Causing Delay in Discharge in Patients Eligible for Ambulatory Lumbar Fusion Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2022; 47:1137-1144. [PMID: 35797654 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To analyze the postoperative factors that led delayed discharge in patients who would have been eligible for ambulatory lumbar fusion (ALF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Assessing postoperative inefficiencies is vital to increase the feasibility of ALF. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and would have met the eligibility criteria for ALF were included. Length of stay (LOS); time in postanesthesia recovery unit (PACU); alertness and neurological examination, and pain scores at three and six hours; type of analgesia; time to physical therapy (PT) visit; reasons for PT nonclearance; time to per-oral (PO) intake; time to voiding; time to readiness for discharge were assessed. Time taken to meet each discharge criterion was calculated. Multiple regression analyses were performed to study the effect of variables on postoperative parameters influencing discharge. RESULTS Of 71 patients, 4% were discharged on the same day and 69% on postoperative day 1. PT clearance was the last-met discharge criterion in 93%. Sixty-six percent did not get PT evaluation on the day of surgery. Seventy-six percent required intravenous opioids and <60% had adequate pain control. Twenty-six percent had orthostatic intolerance. The median postoperative LOS was 26.9 hours, time in PACU was 4.2 hours, time to PO intake was 6.5 hours, time to first void was 6.3 hours, time to first PT visit was 17.7 hours, time to PT clearance was 21.8 hours, and time to discharge readiness was 21.9 hours. Regression analysis showed that time to PT clearance, time to PO intake, time to voiding, time in PACU, and pain score at three hours had a significant effect on LOS. CONCLUSIONS Unavailability of PT, surgery after 1 pm , orthostatic intolerance, inadequate pain control, prolonged PACU stay, and long feeding and voiding times were identified as modifiable factors preventing same-day discharge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyush Shahi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Avani S Vaishnav
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Ahilan Sivaganesan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jose M Sarmiento
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Hikari Urakawa
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Kasra Araghi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Daniel J Shinn
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Junho Song
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sidhant S Dalal
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sravisht Iyer
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - James E Dowdell
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Sheeraz A Qureshi
- Department of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|