No Effect of NSAID Use on Efficacy of Zoledronate: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Trial in Osteopenic Older Women

Bisphosphonates are widely used for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are also widely used among the older population group at high risk of fractures. NSAIDs have been shown to impact on bone turnover, and a recent reanalysis of a clinical trial of clodronate found that NSAID use at baseline abrogated any effect of clodronate on either bone density (BMD) or fracture risk. To determine whether NSAIDs influence the efficacy of other bisphosphonates, we have reanalyzed our 6-year randomized controlled trial of zoledronate in 2000 osteopenic postmenopausal women. NSAID use was reported at baseline in 38% of the cohort and anytime use was reported by 65%. The evolution of the zoledronate effects on BMD were almost identical whether or not women were using NSAIDs at baseline and were significant in both subgroups at all BMD sites (p < 0.0001). The significant reduction in the risk of fracture in those allocated to zoledronate (p < 0.0001) showed no interaction with baseline use of NSAIDs (p = 0.33) nor with NSAID use at any time during the study (p = 0.28). The odds of fracture were significantly reduced in both NSAID users and nonusers. We conclude that the present analysis provides no support for the suggestion that NSAIDs interfere with the efficacy of potent bisphosphonates in terms of their effects on bone density or fracture. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Zoledronate Reduces Height Loss Independently of Vertebral Fracture Occurrence in a Randomized Trial in Osteopenic Older Women

Vertebral fractures are associated with height loss, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality and are an important endpoint for osteoporosis trials. However, height loss is associated with quality of life and mortality independent of associations with fracture. We have used data from a recent 6-year trial of zoledronate in 2000 osteopenic women aged >65 years to assess the impact of the semiquantitative and quantitative components of the definition of vertebral fracture on the outcome of that trial, to determine what factors impacted on height loss and to test whether height loss can be used as a surrogate for vertebral fracture incidence. In the trial protocol, an incident vertebral fracture was defined as a change in Genant grade plus both a 20% and 4 mm decrease in a vertebral height. The addition of the quantitative criteria reduced the number of fractures detected but did not change the size of the anti-fracture effect (odds ratios of 0.49 versus 0.45) nor the width of the confidence intervals for the odds ratios. Multivariate analysis of baseline predictors of height change showed that age accelerated height loss (p < 0.0001) and zoledronate reduced it (p = 0.0001). Incident vertebral fracture increased height loss (p = 0.0005) but accounted for only 0.7% of the variance in height change, so fracture could not be reliably inferred from height loss. In women without incident vertebral fractures, height loss was still reduced by zoledronate (height change: zoledronate, -1.23; placebo -1.51 mm/yr, p < 0.0001). This likely indicates that zoledronate prevents a subtle but widespread loss of vertebral body heights not detected by vertebral morphometry. Because height loss is associated with quality of life and mortality independent of associations with fracture, it is possible that zoledronate impacts on these endpoints via its effects on vertebral body integrity. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Abusive head trauma in children: radiographs of the skull do not provide additional information in the diagnosis of skull fracture when multiplanar computed tomography with three-dimensional reconstructions is available

BACKGROUND

Some data suggest that CT is more accurate than skull radiographs in diagnosing skull fractures in abusive head trauma.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether multiplanar CT with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions alone is non-inferior to combination CT/skull radiography for the diagnosis of skull fracture in suspected physical abuse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified children who had skull radiographs and concurrent multiplanar CT with 3-D reconstructions obtained during suspected physical abuse imaging between 2010 and 2019, and a fracture diagnosis in the formal report. We included all fracture cases and an equal number of randomly selected non-fracture controls in an anonymised dataset. This dataset was independently reviewed for skull fracture by two paediatric radiologists and one less-experienced trainee using either radiography alone, CT alone or CT/skull radiography. The primary outcome was discordance in diagnosis of skull fracture between CT alone and CT/skull radiography, with a result > 0.03 deemed to indicate inferiority of CT alone. The Fleiss kappa was used to assess interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

We included 106 children, 53 with and 53 without skull fracture. A single case was discordant between CT alone and CT/skull radiography, resulting in discordance of 0.009, consistent with non-inferiority of CT alone. The sensitivity and specificity of CT alone and CT/skull radiography were 98% and 96-98%, respectively, whereas radiography alone was more inaccurate (81% sensitivity and 96% specificity). Interobserver agreement for all modalities was very high (kappa 0.86-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Multiplanar CT with 3-D reconstructions alone is not inferior (and clinically equivalent) to CT/skull radiography for diagnosing skull fracture in suspected physical abuse imaging and was as accurate when reported by a less-experienced trainee. This suggests that skull radiography can be removed from suspected physical abuse imaging guidelines.

Effect of Zoledronate on Lower Respiratory Infections in Older Women: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

A recent observational study of the incidence of pneumonia in patients with previous hip fractures found that bisphosphonate use reduced pneumonia risk by about one-quarter, in comparisons with those either not receiving osteoporosis treatment or receiving treatment with non-bisphosphonate drugs. Mortality from pneumonia was similarly reduced. It was hypothesized that effects of these drugs on immune or inflammatory function might mediate this effect. We have used the adverse event database from our recent 6-year randomized controlled trial of zoledronate in 2000 women over the age of 65 years, to determine whether a similar effect is observed using this more rigorous study design. Seventy-five women had at least one episode of pneumonia (32 [3.2%] zoledronate, 43 [4.3%] placebo) and 119 women had at least one episode of either pneumonia or a lower respiratory tract infection (57 [5.7%] zoledronate, 62 [6.2%] placebo). There were 93 pneumonia events and 167 pneumonia/lower respiratory infection events. For pneumonia, the hazard ratio associated with randomization to zoledronate was 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.16; P = 0.18) and the rate ratio was 0.69 (0.45, 1.04; P = 0.073). For the composite endpoint of pneumonia or lower respiratory infection, the hazard ratio was 0.90 (0.61, 1.30; P = 0.58) and the rate ratio 0.74 (0.54, 0.997; P = 0.048). The proportion of people with events changed approximately linearly over time in both groups, suggesting a progressive divergence in cumulative incidence during the study. In conclusion, these findings lend support to the hypothesis that bisphosphonate use reduces the number of lower respiratory tract infections in older women, though the present study is under-powered for this endpoint and the findings are of borderline statistical significance. Further analysis of other trials of bisphosphonates is necessary to test this possibility further, and exploration of the possible underlying mechanisms is needed.

Predictors of Fracture in Older Women With Osteopenic Hip Bone Mineral Density Treated With Zoledronate

A recent analysis has found that during treatment with denosumab, women attaining higher bone densities (BMD) are less likely to have incident fractures. We have reexamined this important question using data from our recent trial of zoledronate in osteopenic women. One thousand women randomized to treatment with zoledronate were followed for 6 years. Of those, 122 sustained fragility fractures during follow-up. Baseline age, nonvertebral fracture history, total hip BMD, and calculated fracture risk were all significantly different between those who had fractures during the study and those who did not. BMDs achieved during the study were higher in those without incident fractures. However, achieved BMDs were very closely related to baseline values (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001). The increase in BMD during zoledronate treatment was not different between those who had incident fractures and those who did not (0.15 < p < 0.78), and change in BMD was not predictive of fracture (univariate logistic regression analysis). Stepwise regression analysis of all baseline variables showed the best independent predictors of fracture to be age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.13, p = 0.0003), baseline spine BMD (OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.96, p = 0.016), and history of nonvertebral fracture (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.06-2.69, p = 0.028). Addition of change in BMD to this model did not improve its predictive power. If changes in BMD were included in the stepwise regression analysis of baseline variables, they did not emerge as significant predictors of fracture. It is concluded that age, fracture history, and baseline BMD determine the risk of new fractures. Differences in achieved BMD between those who do or do not fracture arise from the close relationship between baseline and achieved BMDs. These findings suggest that targeting any particular BMD during treatment is unlikely to be a useful or valid strategy. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Zoledronate Slows Weight Loss and Maintains Fat Mass in Osteopenic Older Women: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Studies in mice have suggested that osteocalcin plays an important role in glucose and fat metabolism. Since anti-resorptive drugs reduce circulating levels of osteocalcin they might be associated with increased fat mass and an increased risk of diabetes. Positive changes in body weight have been found in trials of alendronate and denosumab, but no significant effect in a previous trial of zoledronate. Whether those weight differences were in fat or lean mass is unknown. There were no effects of anti-resorptive treatments on fasting glucose concentrations or incidence of diabetes in those three studies. We have used our recent trial comparing zoledronate and placebo over 6 years in 2000 older osteopenic women to re-examine these questions. Both treatment groups lost body weight during the study (placebo 1.65 kg, zoledronate 1.05 kg), and this was significantly greater in the placebo group (P = 0.01). Both groups lost lean mass, and this loss was marginally (0.17 kg) but significantly (P = 0.02) greater in those receiving zoledronate. The placebo group had a mean loss of fat mass of 0.63 kg but there was no change in fat mass in the zoledronate group (between-groups comparison, P = 0.007). In the placebo group, there were 20 new diagnoses of diabetes, and in the zoledronate group, 19 (P = 0.87). Zoledronate prevented age-related loss of fat mass in these late postmenopausal women. The present study is the first to document a significant effect of zoledronate treatment on body weight, confirming results previously found with alendronate and denosumab. It also demonstrates that this is principally an effect to maintain fat mass rather than influencing lean mass, raising an important physiological question as to how anti-resorptive drugs have this effect on intermediary metabolism. It is possible that this anti-catabolic action contributes to the beneficial effects of anti-resorptive drugs on bone and longevity.

Effects of Zoledronate on Cancer, Cardiac Events, and Mortality in Osteopenic Older Women

We recently showed that zoledronate prevented fractures in older women with osteopenia (hip T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5). In addition to fewer fractures, this study also suggested that women randomized to zoledronate had fewer vascular events, a lower incidence of cancer, and a trend to lower mortality. The present analysis provides a more detailed presentation of the adverse event data from that study, a 6-year, double-blind trial of 2000 women aged >65 years recruited using electoral rolls. They were randomly assigned to receive four infusions of either zoledronate 5 mg or normal saline at 18-month intervals. Supplements of vitamin D, but not calcium, were provided. There were 1017 serious adverse events in 443 participants in the placebo group, and 820 events in 400 participants in those randomized to zoledronate (relative risk = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.00). These events included fractures resulting in hospital admission. Myocardial infarction occurred in 39 women (43 events) in the placebo group and in 24 women (25 events) in the zoledronate group (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% CI, 0.36 to 1.00]; rate ratio 0.58 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94]). For a prespecified composite cardiovascular endpoint (sudden death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery revascularization, or stroke) 69 women had 98 events in the placebo group, and 53 women had 71 events in the zoledronate group (hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.08]; rate ratio 0.72 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.98]). Total cancers were significantly reduced with zoledronate (hazard ratio 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89]; rate ratio 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89]), and this was significant for both breast cancers and for non-breast cancers. Eleven women had recurrent or second breast cancers during the study, all in the placebo group. The hazard ratio for death was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.40 to 1.06; p = 0.08), and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.87) in those without incident fragility fracture. These apparent beneficial effects justify further appropriately powered trials of zoledronate with these nonskeletal conditions as primary endpoints. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Anti-fracture efficacy of zoledronate in subgroups of osteopenic postmenopausal women: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

We recently reported that the administration of zoledronate every 18 months to osteopenic older women reduces the incidence of fractures.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we present a more detailed analysis of that trial to determine whether baseline clinical characteristics impact on the anti-fracture efficacy of this intervention.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial in osteopenic postmenopausal women aged ≥ 65 years, to determine the anti-fracture efficacy of zoledronate. 2000 women were recruited using electoral rolls and randomized to receive 4 infusions of either zoledronate 5 mg or normal saline, at 18-month intervals. Each participant was followed for 6 years. Calcium supplements were not supplied.

RESULTS

Fragility fractures (either vertebral or nonvertebral) occurred in 190 women in the placebo group (227 fractures) and in 122 women in the zoledronate group (131 fractures), odds ratio (OR) 0.59 (95%CI 0.46, 0.76; P < 0.0001). There were no significant interactions between baseline variables (age, anthropometry, BMI, dietary calcium intake, baseline fracture status, recent falls history, bone mineral density, calculated fracture risk) and the treatment effect. In particular, the reduction in fractures appeared to be independent of baseline fracture risk, and numbers needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one woman fracturing were not significantly different across baseline fracture risk tertiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The present analyses indicate that the decrease in fracture numbers is broadly consistent across this cohort. The lack of relationship between NNTs and baseline fracture risk calls into question the need for BMD measurement and precise fracture risk assessment before initiating treatment in older postmenopausal women.

Retinal haemorrhage in a child with optic neuritis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

A 2-year-old presented with lethargy, acute visual loss, fixed dilated pupils and severe bilateral retinal haemorrhages. The retinal findings raised concerns about abusive head trauma, but subsequent investigations confirmed the diagnosis of bilateral optic neuritis associated with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.

Fracture Prevention with Zoledronate in Older Women with Osteopenia

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates prevent fractures in patients with osteoporosis, but their efficacy in women with osteopenia is unknown. Most fractures in postmenopausal women occur in those with osteopenia, so therapies that are effective in women with osteopenia are needed.

METHODS

We conducted a 6-year, double-blind trial involving 2000 women with osteopenia (defined by a T score of -1.0 to -2.5 at either the total hip or the femoral neck on either side) who were 65 years of age or older. Participants were randomly assigned to receive four infusions of either zoledronate at a dose of 5 mg (zoledronate group) or normal saline (placebo group) at 18-month intervals. A dietary calcium intake of 1 g per day was advised, but calcium supplements were not provided. Participants who were not already taking vitamin D supplements received cholecalciferol before the trial began (a single dose of 2.5 mg) and during the trial (1.25 mg per month). The primary end point was the time to first occurrence of a nonvertebral or vertebral fragility fracture.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean (±SD) age was 71±5 years, the T score at the femoral neck was -1.6±0.5, and the median 10-year risk of hip fracture was 2.3%. A fragility fracture occurred in 190 women in the placebo group and in 122 women in the zoledronate group (hazard ratio with zoledronate, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.79; P<0.001). The number of women that would need to be treated to prevent the occurrence of a fracture in 1 woman was 15. As compared with the placebo group, women who received zoledronate had a lower risk of nonvertebral fragility fractures (hazard ratio, 0.66; P=0.001), symptomatic fractures (hazard ratio, 0.73; P=0.003), vertebral fractures (odds ratio, 0.45; P=0.002), and height loss (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of nonvertebral or vertebral fragility fractures was significantly lower in women with osteopenia who received zoledronate than in women who received placebo. (Funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12609000593235 .).

Calcium intake and risk of fracture: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To examine the evidence underpinning recommendations to increase calcium intake through dietary sources or calcium supplements to prevent fractures.

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies of calcium intake with fracture as an endpoint. Results from trials were pooled with random effects meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, Embase, PubMed, and references from relevant systematic reviews. Initial searches undertaken in July 2013 and updated in September 2014.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Randomised controlled trials or cohort studies of dietary calcium, milk or dairy intake, or calcium supplements (with or without vitamin D) with fracture as an outcome and participants aged >50.

RESULTS

There were only two eligible randomised controlled trials of dietary sources of calcium (n=262), but 50 reports from 44 cohort studies of relations between dietary calcium (n=37), milk (n=14), or dairy intake (n=8) and fracture outcomes. For dietary calcium, most studies reported no association between calcium intake and fracture (14/22 for total, 17/21 for hip, 7/8 for vertebral, and 5/7 for forearm fracture). For milk (25/28) and dairy intake (11/13), most studies also reported no associations. In 26 randomised controlled trials, calcium supplements reduced the risk of total fracture (20 studies, n=58,573; relative risk 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96) and vertebral fracture (12 studies, n=48,967. 0.86, 0.74 to 1.00) but not hip (13 studies, n=56,648; 0.95, 0.76 to 1.18) or forearm fracture (eight studies, n=51,775; 0.96, 0.85 to 1.09). Funnel plot inspection and Egger's regression suggested bias toward calcium supplements in the published data. In randomised controlled trials at lowest risk of bias (four studies, n=44,505), there was no effect on risk of fracture at any site. Results were similar for trials of calcium monotherapy and co-administered calcium and vitamin D. Only one trial in frail elderly women in residential care with low dietary calcium intake and vitamin D concentrations showed significant reductions in risk of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary calcium intake is not associated with risk of fracture, and there is no clinical trial evidence that increasing calcium intake from dietary sources prevents fractures. Evidence that calcium supplements prevent fractures is weak and inconsistent.