Training and match load in professional rugby union: Do contextual factors influence the training week?

Background

Rugby union demands a multifaceted approach to training, given the multiple physical and technical attributes required to play the sport.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to describe the distribution of training throughout the week and investigate how this may be influenced by match-related factors.

Methods

Training load data (session Rating of Perceived Exertion [sRPE], total distance and high-speed running [HSR]) were collected from six professional English rugby teams during the 2017/18 season. Five contextual factors were also recorded including: standard of opposition, competition type, result of previous fixture, surface type, and match venue.

Results

The day prior to matches demonstrated the lowest training load (101 AU (95% CIs: 0-216 AU), 1 047 m (95% CIs:1 128-1 686 m) and 59 m (95% CIs: 0-343 m), respectively), while four days prior to the match demonstrated the highest training load (464 AU (95% CIs: 350-578), 2 983 m (95% CIs: 2 704-3 262m) and 234m (95% CIs: 0-477m), respectively). Of the five contextual factors, competition type was the only variable that demonstrated greater than trivial findings, with training before European fixtures the lowest stimulus across the four different competition types. Standard of opposition, previous result, surface type and venue had only trivial effects on training load (effect sizes = -0.13 to 0.15).

Conclusion

Future studies should outline the distribution of other training metrics, including contact and collision training. This study provides a multi-club evaluation that demonstrates the variety of loading strategies prior to competitive match play and highlights competition type as the most influential contextual factor impacting the average training load.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: updated analysis of 93 randomized patients - control survival is much better than previously assumed

AIM

Lung metastases from colorectal cancer are resected in selected patients in the belief that this confers a significant survival advantage. It is generally assumed that the 5-year survival of these patients would be near zero without metastasectomy. We tested the clinical effectiveness of this practice in Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC), a randomized, controlled noninferiority trial.

METHOD

Multidisciplinary teams in 14 hospitals recruited patients with resectable lung metastases into a two-arm trial. Randomization was remote and stratified according to site, with minimization for age, sex, primary cancer stage, interval since primary resection, prior liver involvement, number of metastases and carcinoembryonic antigen level. The trial management group was blind to patient allocation until after intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2016, 93 participants were randomized. These patients were 35-86 years of age and had between one and six lung metastases at a median of 2.7 years after colorectal cancer resection; 29% had prior liver metastasectomy. The patient groups were well matched and the characteristics of these groups were similar to those of observational studies. The median survival after metastasectomy was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.1-6.6) years compared with 3.8 (95% CI: 3.1-4.6) years for controls. The estimated unadjusted hazard ratio for death within 5 years, comparing the metastasectomy group with the control group, was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-1.56). Use of chemotherapy or local ablation was infrequent and similar in each group.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the control group (who did not undergo lung metastasectomy) have better survival than is assumed. Survival in the metastasectomy group is comparable with the many single-arm follow-up studies. The groups were well matched with features similar to those reported in case series.

OS12.4 In vivo dynamics and targeting of vessel co-option in glioma

BACKGROUND

Gliomas comprise heterogeneous malignant glial and stromal cells. While blood vessel co-option is a potential mechanism to escape anti-angiogenic therapy, the relevance of glial phenotype in this process is unclear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Here, we intravitally study preclinical syngenetic models of glioma as well as patient-derived cells transplanted orthotopically. Moreover, we profoundly confirm our preclinical results with histological studies on patient specimens.

RESULTS

We show that Olig2+ oligodendrocyte precursor-like glioma cells invade by single-cell vessel co-option and preserve the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Conversely, Olig2-negative glioma cells form dense perivascular collections and promote angiogenesis and BBB breakdown, leading to innate immune cell activation. Experimentally, Olig2 promotes Wnt7b expression, a finding that correlates in human glioma profiling. Targeted Wnt7a/7b deletion or pharmacologic Wnt inhibition blocks Olig2+ glioma single-cell vessel co-option and enhances responses to temozolomide. Finally, Olig2 and Wnt7 become upregulated after anti-VEGF treatment in preclinical models and patients.

CONCLUSION

Here, we show that glioma is able to employ vessel co-option, i.e. the movement of tumor cells towards and along the pre-existing vasculature.

Glioma oligodendrocyte-like (OPCL) cells express Wnt7 that is necessary for vessel co-option and Wnt inhibitors significantly improve survival with temozolomide. Moreover, we demonstrated that anti-VEGF-treatment of glioma selects for Olig2/Wnt7+ cells

Phase I trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma

Sorafenib is an inhibitor of multiple kinases that has demonstrated antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activity in a number of in vitro and in vivo model systems. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sorafenib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Sorafenib was given orally, twice a day (BID), continuously in 28-day cycles. The dose was escalated in 2 groups of patients stratified by use of enzyme-inducing antiseizure drugs (± EIASDs). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grades 3-4 nonhematological toxicity, grade 4 hematological toxicity, and febrile neutropenia. The number of evaluable patients enrolled in the +EIASD and -EIASD arms were 23 and 24, respectively. DLTs were predominantly dermatological and gastrointestinal effects, as observed in previous clinical trials of sorafenib. The MTD was 600 mg BID for patients receiving EIASDs and 800 mg BID for those who were not. The plasma pharmacokinetics of sorafenib were not significantly affected by the concurrent administration of EIASDs. The MTD of sorafenib given orally BID on a continuous basis was established as 600 mg BID in patients with malignant glioma who were concurrently receiving EIASDs and 800 mg BID in those who were not. Further evaluation is warranted of sorafenib at the recommended MTD against recurrent or progressive malignant glioma in combination with other molecularly targeted drugs or in the newly diagnosed setting concurrent with chemoradiation.

Phase I trial of vatalanib (PTK787) in combination with standard radiation and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

2035

Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are hypothesized to work synergistically with chemotherapy and radiation (RT). Vatalanib (MW 347, T1/2 4.6 h) is an oral, pan-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose of vatalanib in combination with RT and TMZ for patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were taking enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs. RT and TMZ were administered at standard doses. Vatalanib was initiated 5 days prior to the start of RT and continued daily until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity or a maximum of up to 12 cycles of post-RT TMZ. Cohorts of 3 patients were treated during RT and TMZ at doses of 250mg daily, 250mg BID, or 500mg BID of vatalanib. Following the completion of RT, patients were treated with vatalanib 750mg BID for the remainder of the study. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled of which 17 took 5 or more days of vatalanib (1 patient withdrew consent prior to start of vatalanib and 1 withdrew consent after only 1 dose). The median age was 58 and the median KPS was 90. Eight patients had a diagnostic biopsy only. The MTD has not been reached. Potentially related grade 3–4 toxicities included elevated transaminases (2 patients), thrombocytopenia (1 patient), leukopenia (1 patient), neutropenia (1 patient), depressed level of consciousness (1 patient), and fatigue (1 patient). Only 1 patient suffered an asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and no patient experienced wound dehiscence or infection. Five patients remain on vatalanib and the median follow-up for all patients is 6.5 months. Seven patients have died. The best responses for the 13 patients who completed combination RT/TMZ/vatalanib was 2 PR, 7 SD, and 2 PD. Two patients were clinically stable with biopsy proven pseudoprogression. Median PFS is 18.4+ months and OS has not been reached. Conclusions: Vatalanib is safe and well tolerated when added to standard RT and TMZ. The MTD has not been reached and dose escalation continues in this population of patients on enzyme inducing anti-epileptic drugs.

[Table: see text]

NABTT 0306: A randomized phase II trial of EMD 121974 in conjunction with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide with radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)

2001

Background: EMD 121974 (cilengitide) is a selective integrin receptor inhibitor that is well tolerated and has demonstrated biological activity in patients with malignant glioma. The objectives of this phase II trial were to determine safety when combined with chemoradiation and estimate the overall survival for two different doses in newly diagnosed GBM. Methods: A total of 112 patients were accrued onto the trial through the NABTT CNS consortium. Cilengitide was administered by one-hour infusion twice a week with 18 patients treated in a safety run-in phase of 6 patients at the tested dose levels of 500 mg, 1000 mg, and 2000 mg. After safety completion, 94 patients were randomly assigned to either 500 mg or 2000 mg groups. To date, 55 out of 112 (49%) patients have died. Overall survival was estimated using all patients in this trial regardless of their treating dose. Results: The median age was 55 years old (range: 22–88) and the median KPS was 90 (range: 60–100). 86 out of the 112 (76.8%) had a craniotomy as their initial surgical procedure and 25 patients (22%) had a biopsy. There were no DLTs during the safety run-in phase. The estimated median survival time is 18.9 months (95% CI: 16.3 -30.0 months) for patients treated with RT+TMZ+EMD. The trial was closed to accrual on December 31, 2007. To date, 89 out of 112 patients were alive 12 months from their initial diagnosis. The overall survival at 12 months for all patients is 79.5% (95% CI: 71–87%). MGMT methylation status and survival based on dose levels received are not currently available. Conclusions: EMD 121974 (cilengitide) is well-tolerated when combined with standard chemoradiation (TMZ+RT) and may improve survival for patients newly diagnosed with GBM given the substantial differences between the estimated median survival and that seen in the EORTC study (Stupp, N Engl J Med, 2005).

[Table: see text]

A phase II study of XL184 in patients (pts) with progressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in first or second relapse

2047

Background: XL184 is a potent orally bioavailable inhibitor of MET, RET, KIT, and VEGFR2. Elevated levels of VEGFR2 and its ligand VEGF are found in GBM, and elevated levels of MET and KIT are correlated with poor prognosis in GBM pts. Treatment with XL184 results in potent inhibition of GBM in preclinical models. Methods: This is a phase II study of 46 pts with recurrent GBM who received XL184 175mg PO qd. Co-primary objectives are 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and safety. Secondary objectives include response rate (per MacDonald Criteria), duration of response, overall survival, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters, vascular imaging, and changes in steroid usage. Results: As of January 6, 2009, all 46 pts have been enrolled. At least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment at 4 weeks was available for 26 pts. Of these, 17 pts had not received prior therapy with an anti-angiogenic agent, whereas 9 pts had received prior therapy with bevacizumab (n = 6), vandetanib (n = 2), or VEGF-TRAP (n = 1). Safety: 6 pts have experienced a total of 9 possibly related grade 3/4 SAEs including increased troponin I and myocarditis (n = 1); dehydration, nausea, and fatigue (n = 1); elevated ALT (n = 1); pulmonary embolism (n = 2); and CNS hemorrhage (n = 1). 24/46 (52%) pts have required a dose interruption or reduction due to AEs or SAEs. Based on investigator assessment of bidimensional contrast-enhancing tumor measurements, 10 pts (38%) had a best radiologic response of >= 50% reduction from baseline (including 1 pt with a 100% reduction), 9 pts (35%) had tumor measurement changes ranging from +24% and -49%, and 7 pts (27%) had a >= 25% increase in tumor burden. Of the 17 anti-angiogenic-naïve pts, 9 (53%) had a best radiologic response of >= 50% reduction in tumor burden. 1 pt with prior vandetanib therapy has experienced a best radiologic response of >= 50%. Of the 4 pts with > 6 months follow-up, 3 remain on study with a sustained radiologic response. Conclusions: XL184 at a dose of 175 mg PO qd, has demonstrated substantial activity in pts with progressive or recurrent GBM. Updated safety and efficacy results including centrally reviewed PFS6 and response rate will be reported.

[Table: see text]

Primary CNS lymphoma with intraocular involvement: International PCNSL Collaborative Group Report

OBJECTIVE

To describe the demographics, diagnostic details, therapeutic management, and outcome in patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) with ocular involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 221 patients was assembled from 16 centers in seven countries. Only HIV-negative, immunocompetent patients with brain and ocular lymphoma were included; none had systemic lymphoma.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 60. Fifty-seven percent were women. Median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 2. Ocular disturbance and behavioral/cognitive changes were the most common presenting symptoms. Diagnosis of lymphoma was made by brain biopsy (147), vitrectomy (65), or CSF cytology (11). Diagnosis of intraocular lymphoma was made by vitrectomy/choroidal/retinal biopsy (90) or clinical ophthalmic examination (141). CSF cytology was positive in 23%. Treatment information was available for 176 patients. A total of 102 received dedicated ocular therapy (ocular radiotherapy 79, intravitreal methotrexate 22, and both 1) in addition to treatment for their brain lymphoma. Sixty-nine percent progressed at a median of 13 months; sites of progression included brain 52%, eyes 19%, brain and eyes 12%, and systemic 2%. Patients treated with local ocular therapy did not have a statistically significant decreased risk of failing in the eyes (p = 0.7). Median progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort were 18 and 31 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest reported series of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) with intraocular involvement. Progression free and overall survival was similar to that reported with PCNSL. Dedicated ocular therapy improved disease control but did not affect overall survival.

Primary intraocular lymphoma: an International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group Report

BACKGROUND

Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL) is an uncommon subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Because it is rare and difficult to diagnose, the natural history and optimal management are unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 83 HIV negative, immunocompetent PIOL patients was assembled from 16 centers in seven countries.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 65. Median ECOG performance status was 0. Presenting symptoms included blurred vision, decreased visual acuity, and floaters. Median time to diagnosis was 6 months. Diagnosis was made by vitrectomy (74), choroidal/retinal biopsy (6) and ophthalmic exam (3). Eleven percent had positive CSF cytology. Initial treatment was categorized as focal in 23 (intra-ocular methotrexate, ocular radiotherapy) or extensive in 53 (systemic chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy). Six received none; details are unknown in one. Forty-seven relapsed: brain 47%, eyes 30%, brain and eyes 15%, and systemic 8%. Median time to relapse was 19 months. Focal therapy alone did not increase risk of brain relapse. Median progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29.6 and 58 months, respectively, and unaffected by treatment type.

CONCLUSION

Treatment type did not affect relapse pattern, median PFS or OS. Focal therapy may minimize treatment toxicity without compromising disease control.

A phase I study of SDX-102 for the treatment of patients with MTAP-deficient recurrent malignant gliomas

2063

Background: De novo purine biosynthesis entails two metabolic pathways of which one pathway is frequently impaired in cancer due to gene deletion of the rate limiting enzyme, methythioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP). In MTAP-deficient cancers, SDX-102 inhibits purine biosynthesis by blocking the remaining synthetic pathway. This study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity and pharmacokinetic activity of SDX-102 in the treatment of recurrent MTAP-deficient malignant gliomas. Methods: Eligible patients had recurrent supratentorial MTAP-deficient malignant gliomas treated previously with surgery, radiation and = 2 regimens of chemotherapy. Dose escalation was conducted separately for patients taking enzyme inducing anti-seizure drugs (EIASD+) and for those not (EIASD-). The starting dose in both groups was 80 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks, cycle length was 3 weeks. Dose escalation was in a stepwise fashion in cohorts of three patients, up to a maximum dose of 125 mg/m2/day. Results: 118 patients were screened of which 39 (33%) had MTAP-deficient tumors. 21 patients (14 males/7 females) were enrolled between 9/17/04 and 3/17/06. Median age was 50 years (23–76); median KPS was 90 (60–100); 16 patients (76%) had GBM. Two dose levels of SDX-102 were tested in the EIASD+ group: 80 mg/m2/day (n=4) and 100 mg/m2/day (n=3), 3/3 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) were noted with grade 3 mucositis at 100 mg/m2/day , so in the EIASD+ group the MTD was 80 mg/m2/day. Three dose levels were tested in the EIASD- group: 80 mg/m2/day (n=4), 100 mg/m2/day (n=7), 1/3 patients had DLT (Grade 4 mucositis) at 100 mg/m2/day and the cohort was expanded for additional 3 patients without DLT noted; and 125 mg/m2/day (n=3) amongst whom no DLT was observed. No MTD was determined in the EIASD- group because the MTAP assay became unavailable through the sponsor. There were a range of 1–14 cycles administered in this patient population. Conclusions: SDX-102 infusion is safe and feasible in patients with recurrent MTAP-deficient malignant gliomas. The MTD in EIASD+ patients is 80 mg/m2/day. The EIASD-group MTD has not been determined however the highest dose tested is 125 mg/m2/day.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I trial of sorafenib (BAY 43–9006) for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma (NABTT 0401)

2058

Background: Sorafenib (BAY 43–9006) is a small molecule inhibitor of multiple kinases to include raf, VEGF receptors, and PDGF receptors. The molecule has demonstrated anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic activity in a number of in vitro and in vivo model systems. Methods: In this multi-institutional trial, we have conducted a phase I dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sorafenib in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Cohorts of 3 patients, stratified based on the use of enzyme inducing anticonvulsants (EIAC) or not (non-EIAC), have completed enrollment through the following dose levels: 200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg. Therapy has been given as a twice daily oral administration with cycles of 28 day duration. Results: A total of 35 patients have been enrolled and are evaluable for toxicity. Treatment related dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 3 or 4 non-hematological toxicity, and grade 4 hematological toxicity (platlets and ANC) or febrile neutropenia of any duration. The following DLTs were observed: one grade 3 hand-foot-syndrome at the 400 mg BID (EIAC), one grade 3 puritis 400 mg BID (non-EIAC) dose level, grade 3 hand/foot syndrome 800 mg BID (EIAC and non-EIAC arms), grade 3 hypophosphatemia 800 mg BID (EIAC), and grade 3 joint pain 800 mg BID (EIAC). A MTD of 600 mg BID has been defined for the EIAC arm with 3/6 DLTs at 800 mg BID. A MTD has not been defined and enrollment has been completed through the 800 mg BID dose level for the non-EIAC. Of the enrolled patients, 20 are with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), 8 with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), and 7 with anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). Conclusions: The MTD for sorafenib is 600 mg BID for patients on EIAC. Sorafenib is well tolerated with limited toxicities to doses of 800 mg twice daily in patients with recurrent malignant glioma not on EIAC (non-EIAC arm).

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of AZD2171 (cediranib), an oral pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

2001

Background: AZD2171 (cediranib) is a potent, oral pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a half-life of 20 hours compatible with once-daily dosing. A primary target of AZD2171, VEGFR2, is expressed on glioblastoma endothelium. We have demonstrated normalization of tumor vessels in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with daily doses of AZD2171. Normalization has rapid onset, is reversible and is associated with alleviation of brain edema [Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 83]. Methods: In this phase II study of 30 recurrent glioblastoma subjects the primary endpoint was the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 6 months (APF6). Secondary endpoints include radiographic response proportion; progression-free survival; overall survival and toxicity. At this time we are presenting radiographic response data and toxicity on the first 16 consecutive patients and APF6, PFS and OS on all 30 patients. Complete information will be available on all 30 patients at the time of presentation. Results: Twenty-eight patients have experienced disease progression and two patients remain in follow-up without progression. The primary and secondary endpoints are tabulated below: Only one of the first 16 patients was removed from the study due to toxicity (fatigue). Dose limiting toxicities of hypertension, fatigue and diarrhea were observed in 9/16 patients. There were no intracerebral hemorrhages. AZD2171 alleviated brain edema, a major cause of morbidity in glioblastoma patients, and had a steroid-sparing effect in the first 16 patients enrolled. Blood biomarkers were serially assessed and elevated levels of bFGF, SDF1a and viable circulating endothelial cells correlated with disease progression. Conclusions: AZD2171 has activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Combination studies of AZD2171 with radiation and chemotherapy are planned.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma with induction high-dose methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab followed by consolidation cytarabine/etoposide: A pilot study with biomarker analysis

7595

Background: There is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment for patients diagnosed with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). Between 2001–2004, UCSF PCNSL patients were treated with combination high-dose methotrexate, temozolomide, rituximab (MTR) as induction therapy. Patients in CR with this regimen were treated with high-dose cytarabine plus etoposide as consolidation. The purposes of this study were: (1) Pilot analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of intensive methotrexate-based induction therapy followed by high-dose consolidation with elimination of whole brain irradiation; (2) Analysis of molecular markers in PCNSL which predict sensitivity to chemotherapy and outcome. Methods: 21 untreated, CD20 +, immunocompetent PCNSL patients were treated with combination methotrexate (8 gm/m²), temozolomide (150 mg/m²/day)and rituximab (375 mg/m²). Patients in CR received consolidation cytarabine (2 g/ m² x 8 doses) plus etoposide (40 mg/kg over 96 hours). IHC analysis of potential biomarkers predictive of outcome was performed on paraffin sections from these patients. Candidate markers for validation were selected by gene expression analysis of an independent, multicenter dataset of 20 cases. Results: Mean age was 58.6 y (range 40–81). Median KPS was 60. MTR and cytarabine/etoposide consolidation was well-tolerated with no treatment-related mortality or evidence for neurotoxicity. One case of post-remission cytopenia occurred after consolidation and resolved spontaneously. Eleven patients (52.4%) attained CR with induction; eight received consolidation; three patients in CR deferred consolidation. Median PFS was 11.5 months. Median OS for all 21 patients has not yet been reached with median follow-up of 27.5 months. Expression of the apoptotic regulator DAP-1 by lymphoma cells as determined by IHC was associated with improved PFS (p<0.028) and OS (p<0.021). Conclusions: Combination MTR followed by intensive consolidation appears to be well tolerated in PCNSL. PFS appears at least similar to regimens that contain whole brain irradiation. A larger phase II study has been initiated to evaluate this regimen in a multicenter setting.

[Table: see text]

Calculated versus measured creatinine clearance for the dosing of methotrexate in patients with primary CNS lymphoma

1536

Background: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) (8g/m2), the cornerstone of therapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), is commonly dosed using a measured 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCl) every 2–4 weeks. Because these collections are cumbersome, costly, and at times unreliable, the use of a calculated CrCl was evaluated. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from all 25 patients (287 treatments) with PCNSL who participated in a multi-center phase II clinical trial of HDMTX conducted by the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) CNS Consortium. Results: The 25 patients had a median age of 61 years (range 32–75 years). Seventeen patients (68%) were men. The patients received a median of 14 (range 2–21) HDMTX treatments. For 256 of 287 total treatments (89%), data were available to compare the measured and calculated (using the Cockcroft-Gault equation) CrCl. The average measured CrCl was 93±29 ml/min, and the average calculated CrCl was 107±43 ml/min. The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.66 (p<0.001) between the measured and calculated CrCl. Of the 256 HDMTX treatments evaluated, 158 (62%) had reliable 48-hour serum MTX levels documented. Forty-eight levels (30%) were in the ideal range (0.3–1 μmol/L), 98 levels (62%) were lower (<0.3 μmol/L), 12 levels (8%) were higher (>1–3 μmol/L), and no levels were in the range associated with significant toxicity (>3 μmol/L). Of these 158 treatments, the use of a calculated rather than measured CrCl would have yielded an identical MTX dose for 46 treatments (29%), a higher MTX dose for 62 treatments (39%), and a lower MTX dose for 50 treatments (32%). This distribution was not significantly different among the subsets of low, ideal, and high MTX levels (p=0.13). Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with PCNSL, there is a high correlation between the calculated and measured CrCl. For these patients, there is not a clear association between the method of determining CrCl and serum MTX levels. Therefore, the administered MTX doses using either method are likely to be similar. In this patient population, a calculated CrCl could be used to avoid the cost and inconvenience associated with measured CrCl.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of antiangiogenic (metronomic) chemotherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas

1569

Background: There is preclinical evidence that continuous low-dose chemotherapy may inhibit tumor endothelial proliferation and prevent tumor growth (Browder et al Cancer Res 2000;60:1878). Methods: We conducted a phase II study of continuous low-dose etoposide (VP-16), alternating with cyclophosphamide (CP), in combination with thalidomide (T) and celecoxib (C) in adult patients with recurrent malignant gliomas. There was no limit on the number of prior therapies. Patients received VP-16 [35 mg/m2 (maximum 100 mg) daily for 21 days] alternating with CP [2 mg/kg (maximum 100 mg/day) for 21 days]. Thalidomide was started at 200 mg daily and increased by 100 mg weekly to a maximum of 1200 mg/day, as tolerated. Celecoxib was started at 200 mg twice daily and increased to 400 mg twice daily. MRIs were performed every 6 weeks. Patients were treated until tumor progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. Serum was collected for measurement of angiogenic peptides. Results: 48 patients were enrolled (15 female, 33 male). 28 had glioblastomas (GBM); 20 had anaplastic gliomas (AG). Median age was 53 years (range 33–74); median KPS was 70 (range 60–100). Patients had average of 2.1 prior chemotherapies; 33% had 3 or more prior chemotherapies. Toxicities included neutropenia (8 G3, 8 G4), leukopenia (13 G3, 8 G4), lymphopenia (26 G3), anemia (1 G3), thrombocytopenia (1 G3); nausea (1 G3), vomiting (3 G3), constipation (5 G3; 2 G4), colitis (2 G4), rash (1 G3), dizziness (1 G3); hypoxia (1 G3), and infection (2 G3). 2 patients had DVT and 6 had pulmonary emboli. There were no treatment related deaths. Fatigue was common but usually mild. 12% of patients had PR, 59% had SD, 29% progressed at their first scan. For GBM patients, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 weeks, 6 month-PFS was 9% and median survival was 21 weeks. For AG patients, median PFS was 14 weeks; 6 month-PFS was 26% and median survival was 41.5 weeks. Correlation of angiogenic peptide levels and response will be reported. Conclusions: Although there were some responders this regimen did not significantly improve survival in this heavily pretreated group of patients. However, further studies combining metronomic chemotherapy with more potent angiogenesis inhibitors such as lenalidomide or VEGFR inhibitors may be warranted.

[Table: see text]

Primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL): An International Primary CNS Lymphoma Collaborative group report

1534

Background: PIOL is a hemopoietic tumor that arises in the retina, vitreous or optic nerve head, and carries a high risk of ocular and CNS relapse. The natural history and optimal management are unknown. Methods: A retrospective series of 81 patients with PIOL was assembled from 15 centers in 7 countries. Only patients with isolated ocular lymphoma were included; none had brain, spinal cord, or systemic lymphoma at diagnosis. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 65 (24–85). 58% were women. The median ECOG performance status was 0, and only three had a score > 1. The median latency from symptom onset to diagnosis was 6 months (0– 36). Slit lamp exam was positive in 51, negative in 6, and not reported in 24. Vitrectomy was positive in 72 and negative in 2. 6 had a positive choroidal or retinal biopsy and 1 had no ocular surgery. CSF cytology was positive in 10 (17%), negative in 48, and unknown in 23. 21 received local therapy at diagnosis: 6 intra-ocular methotrexate (400 ug), 14 ocular radiation (median 3600 cGy), and 1 both modalities. 52 received more extensive therapy including systemic chemotherapy alone in 20 and a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in 32. 5 received no treatment and details are unknown in 3. 47 patients (58%) relapsed a median of 19 months (0.5–180) after initial therapy. Sites of relapse included brain 47%, eyes 30%, brain and eyes 15%, and systemic 8%. Patients treated with ocular therapy alone did not have an increased risk of failing in the brain (p = 0.6). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29.6 and 57 months respectively and were unaffected by the choice of therapy. CNS disease was the cause of death in 19/33 (58%). Conclusions: In this series, treatment type did not affect sites of relapse, PFS or OS in patients with PIOL. To minimize toxicity, the best initial therapy should be limited to intraocular chemotherapy or focal radiotherapy. Prospective clinical trials are needed to improve our understanding and treatment of this disease.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.