Vozzo R, Su YC, Fraser RJ, Wittert GA, Horowitz M, Malbert CH, Shulkes A, Volombello T, Chapman IM. Antropyloroduodenal, cholecystokinin and feeding responses to pulsatile and non-pulsatile intraduodenal lipid infusion.
Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002;
14:25-33. [PMID:
11874551 DOI:
10.1046/j.1365-2982.2002.00299.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The contribution of the pulsatile nature of gastric emptying to small intestinal feedback mechanisms modulating antropyloroduodenal motility and appetite is unknown. On separate days, eight healthy male volunteers (18-34 years) received randomized, single-blind, intraduodenal (ID) infusions of 10% Intralipid (2 kcal min(-1)), either continuously [CID], or in a pulsatile manner [PID] (5 s on/15 s off) and 0.9% saline (control) administered continuously, each at a rate of 1.8 mL min(-1) for 3 h. During each infusion, subjective ratings of appetite were assessed and antropyloroduodenal pressures recorded with a 16-lumen manometric assembly incorporating a pyloric sleeve sensor. Plasma cholecystokinin was measured from blood collected at regular intervals throughout the infusion. At the end of each infusion the manometric assembly was removed, subjects were offered a buffet meal and the energy and macronutrient content of the meal was measured. Both ID lipid infusions stimulated isolated pyloric pressure waves (IPPWs) (P < 0.001) and basal pyloric pressure (P < 0.01) and suppressed antral (P < 0.05) and duodenal (P < 0.05) pressure waves when compared to controls; there was no difference in the effects of CID and PID lipid on antropyloroduodenal pressures. Infusions of lipid significantly increased plasma CCK concentrations (P < 0.05) compared with saline, but concentrations were not different between the two modes of lipid delivery (P > 0.05, CID vs. PID). Both intraduodenal lipid infusions decreased hunger (P < 0.05), increased fullness (P < 0.05) and reduced energy intake (P < 0.05) when compared with controls; again there was no difference between CID and PID lipid. We conclude that at the infusion rate of similar 2 kcal min(-1), the acute effects of intraduodenal lipid on antropyloroduodenal pressures, plasma CCK concentration and appetite are not modified by a pulsatile mode of lipid delivery into the duodenum.
Collapse