Current status and issues with the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seed sources at medical facilities in Japan: a questionnaire-based survey†

In conducting dosimetric assays of seed sources containing iodine-125 (125I), several major guidelines require the medical physicist to verify the source strength before patient treatment. Japanese guidelines do not mandate dosimetric assays at medical facilities, but since 2017, three incidents have occurred in Japan wherein seeds with incorrect strengths were delivered to medical facilities. Therefore, this study aimed to survey the current situation and any barriers to conducting the dosimetric assay of iodine-125 seeds at medical facilities in Japan. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey from December 2020 to April 2021, to examine whether seed assay and verification of the number of seeds delivered were being performed. We found that only 9 facilities (16%) performed seed assay and 28 (52%) verified the number of seeds. None of the facilities used an assay method that ensured traceability. The reasons for not performing an assay were divided into two categories: lack of resources and legal issues. Lack of resources included lack of instruments, lack of knowledge of assay methods, shorthand, or all of the above, whereas legal issues included the inability to resterilize iodine-125 seeds distributed in Japan and/or purchase seeds dedicated to the assay. Dosimetric assays, including simple methods, are effective in detecting calibration date errors and non-radioactive seeds. The study findings suggest that familiarization of medical personnel with these assay methods and investigation of the associated costs of labor and equipment should be recommended, as these measures will lead to medical reimbursement for quality assurance.

A Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study on accelerated partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy: clinical results with a median follow-up of 60 months

BACKGROUND

We carried out the first multi-institutional prospective study on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) via multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy in a shorter period for early breast cancer in Japan.

METHODS

Patient eligibility criteria included positive hormone receptors, tumors ≤ 3 cm and TNM stage pN0M0. After breast-conserving surgery (Japanese cylindrical resection) and histological confirmation of negative surgical margins and the absence of lymph node metastasis, applicator implantation was performed either postoperatively or intraoperatively. High-dose-rate brachytherapy of 36 Gy in 6 fractions was delivered.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients from six institutions received this treatment regimen, and the median follow-up time was 60 months (range 57-67 months). The median resected breast tissue volume was 81 cm³ (range 28-260 cm³). No Grade 4 late sequela, local recurrence nor death due to breast cancer were observed. Grade 2-3 sequelae such as rib fracture (2%), soft tissue necrosis (9%), fibrosis (20%), and breast pain (9%) were observed. The resected breast tissue volumes of the patients who had Grade ≥ 2 fibrosis and Grade < 2 fibrosis were 105.9 ± 32.3 cm³ and 76.3 ± 45.6 cm³, respectively, p = 0.02. The overall cosmetic outcome score of Excellent/Good was 74% at 60 months after APBI. Grade ≥ 1 fibrosis was observed in 44% and 92% of patients who scored Excellent/Good and Fair/Poor, respectively, p = 0.004.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed excellent local control and survival results with minimal late sequelae.

Successful treatment of tumor stage mycosis fungoides with total skin helical tomotherapy

Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is a treatment option for mycosis fungoides (MF). In Japan, it has been rarely performed because of the time required for each treatment, physical burden on patients, and difficulties in providing uniform dosimetry. In recent years, helical tomotherapy, an intensity-modulated radiation therapy that applies helical computed tomography technology, has been used to treat cancer. Total skin helical tomotherapy (TSHT) has been suggested as a promising alternative to TSEBT for patients with MF, but there are few reports from Japan. We used TSHT to treat a 28-year-old Japanese woman with tumor stage MF. She achieved complete remission with TSHT (12 Gy in six fractions over 6 days) and remained in remission for 32 months without additional treatment. Treatment-related grade 4 myelosuppression was observed, but resolved with blood transfusions and subcutaneous injection of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. Other adverse events were tolerable. Although careful attention should be paid to myelosuppression, TSHT might be a useful treatment option for MF.

Radiation protection in radiological imaging: a survey of imaging modalities used in Japanese institutions for verifying applicator placements in high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Institutional imaging protocols for the verification of brachytherapy applicator placements were investigated in a survey study of domestic radiotherapy institutions. The survey form designed by a free on-line survey system was distributed via the mailing-list system of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Survey data of 75 institutions between August 2019 and October 2019 were collected. The imaging modalities used were dependent on resources available to the institutions. The displacement of a brachytherapy applicator results in significant dosimetric impact. It is essential to verify applicator placements using imaging modalities before treatment. Various imaging modalities used in institutions included a computed tomography (CT) scanner, an angiography X-ray system, a multi-purpose X-ray system and a radiotherapy simulator. The median total exposure time in overall treatment sessions was $\le$75 s for gynecological and prostate cancers. Some institutions used fluoroscopy to monitor the brachytherapy source movement. Institutional countermeasures for reducing unwanted imaging dose included minimizing the image area, changing the imaging orientation, reducing the imaging frequency and optimizing the imaging conditions. It is worth noting that half of the institutions did not confirm imaging dose regularly. This study reported on the usage of imaging modalities for brachytherapy in Japan. More caution should be applied with interstitial brachytherapy with many catheters that can lead to potentially substantial increments in imaging doses for monitoring the actual brachytherapy source using fluoroscopy. It is necessary to share imaging techniques, standardize imaging protocols and quality assurance/quality control among institutions, and imaging dose guidelines for optimization of imaging doses delivered in radiotherapy should be developed.

Biochemical outcomes and predictive factors by risk group after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2,316 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biochemical freedom from failure (bFFF) by risk group and treatment modality and the predictive factors of bFFF by risk group in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 [I-125] Seed Implantation) in Japan during the first 2 years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analyses included 2,316 participants in 42 institutions; bFFF was evaluated using the Phoenix definition and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the factors associated with bFFF.

RESULTS

Median followup period was 60.0 months. The 5-year bFFF rates in all patients, 1,028 low-risk patients, 1,114 intermediate-risk patients, and 133 high-risk patients were 93.6%, 94.9%, 92.7%, and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year bFFF rates in the PI group and EBRT combination therapy group were 93.7% and 93.3%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, younger age, higher Gleason score (GS), higher percent positive biopsies (%PB), and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0012, 0.0030, 0.0026, and 0.0368) in all patients; younger age, higher pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and lower prostate V₁₀₀ (p = 0.0002, 0.0048, and 0.0012) in low-risk patients; higher GS, higher %PB, and no hormonal treatment (p = 0.0005, 0.0120, and 0.0022) in intermediate-risk patients; and higher GS and higher %PB (p = 0.0329 and 0.0120) in high-risk patients were significantly associated with bFFF.

CONCLUSIONS

PI with or without EBRT resulted in excellent short-term biochemical outcomes in all risk groups, especially in high-risk patients. Age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and prostate V₁₀₀ in low-risk patients; GS, %PB, and hormonal treatment in intermediate-risk patients; and GS and %PB in high-risk patients were independently affected bFFF.

National survey of intracavitary brachytherapy for intact uterine cervical cancer in Japan

To review the current status of, and labor expended for (in terms of time required), intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) in definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer patients, two national surveys were performed. The first survey was conducted between July and August 2016 and consisted of a questionnaire of 12 items regarding ICBT procedures for cervical cancer, which was sent to 173 centers installed with high-dose-rate remote after-loading brachytherapy systems. Between November and December 2016, another survey was performed in 79 centers to evaluate labor required for ICBT procedures in terms of time spent and number of staff involved. In the first survey, the response rate was 77% of the 173 centers. ICBT was performed for cervical cancer in 118 (89%) centers. Imaging modalities used after applicator insertion were X-ray alone in 46 (40%), computed tomography in 69 (60%) and magnetic resonance imaging in 5 (4%) centers. Three-dimensional (3D) planning was performed in 55 centers (48%). Fifty-five (70%) centers responded to the second survey regarding ICBT-mandated labor. The median cumulative duration of the entire ICBT procedure was 330 min (the sum of the times spent by each staff member) and was longer in the 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) (405 min) than in the X-ray group (230 min). This trend was significant for the specific processes of image acquisition and treatment planning, especially for radiation oncologists. In definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer patients, 3D-IGBT use has been gradually spreading in Japan. The present survey revealed that ICBT, especially 3D-IGBT, requires substantial labor and time from staff.

Uncertainty of cosmetic evaluation after accelerated partial breast irradiation: interim analysis of a Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study

PURPOSE

We conducted a multi-institutional prospective study on accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy. The clinical results over a minimum follow-up period of 30 months are presented here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with breast cancer were treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative APBI. After confirmation of negative surgical margins and negative lymph nodes, a high-dose-rate brachytherapy protocol of 36 Gy/6 fractions was carried out. All clinical data were prospectively collected using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 3.0.

RESULTS

No recurrence was observed. Cumulative rates of grade 2 or higher late sequelae were 25% for fibrosis, 2% for fractures, 9% for pain, and 9% for soft tissue necrosis. Rates of excellent or good cosmetic results as assessed by the physician and patient were 93 and 89% at the 12-month follow-up and 76 and 74% at the 30-month follow-up, respectively. Large volumes of resected tissue in small breasts were associated with fibrosis of grade 2 or higher.

CONCLUSION

APBI in Japanese women provides satisfactory clinical results except for cosmetic outcomes. There is some difficulty with the assessment of fibrosis and cosmetic outcomes, especially in patients with small breasts.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000001677.

Predictive factors of rectal toxicity after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2339 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and the associated factors of rectal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan (J-POPS) during the first 2 years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 2,339 subjects were available for the analyses. Rectal toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative incidence for grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.88%, 1.76%, and 6.53% in all subjects, PI group and EBRT combination therapy group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, among all subjects, grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was associated with rectal volumes receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R₁₀₀; p < 0.0001) and EBRT combination therapy (p = 0.0066). R₁₀₀ in the PI group (p = 0.0254), and R₁₀₀ (p = 0.0011) and interactive planning (p = 0.0267) in the EBRT combination therapy group were also associated with grade ≥2 toxicity. The 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 3.80% and 1.37% for R₁₀₀ ≥ 1 mL and R₁₀₀ < 1 mL, respectively, in the PI group (p = 0.0068), and 14.09% and 5.52% for R₁₀₀ ≥ 1 mL and R₁₀₀ < 1 mL, respectively, in the EBRT combination therapy group (p = 0.0070).

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal toxicity was relatively rare in this study compared with previous reports. For Japanese prostate cancer patients, R₁₀₀ < 1 mL in both PI and EBRT combination therapy groups and interactive planning in EBRT combination therapy group may be effective in decreasing the incidence of rectal toxicity.

Seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy by using loose seeds: Japanese prostate cancer outcome study of permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (J-POPS) multi-institutional cohort study

Background

The incidence and associated factors of loose seed migration were investigated in cohort 1 of the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS).

Methods

The study subjects were 2160 patients, consisting of 1641 patients who underwent permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) and 519 patients who underwent PI combined with external beam radiation therapy (PI + EBRT). The presence or absence of seed migration to the chest and abdominal/pelvic region was determined.

Results

Seed migration was observed in 22.7 % of PI group patients and 18.1 % of PI + EBRT group patients (p = 0.0276). Migration to the lungs and abdominal/pelvic region was observed in 14.6 % and 11.1 % of the patients in the PI group, and 11.2 % and 8.5 % of the patients in the PI + EBRT group, respectively. In the PI group, the number of implanted seeds was associated with the seed migration incidence. Neither the PI nor the PI + EBRT group showed any difference in the volume of the prostate receiving 100 % of the prescribed dose (V100 [%]) or the minimal dose received by 90 % of the prostate volume (D90 [Gy]) between the patients with and without seed migration.

Conclusions

This prospective cohort study investigating the largest number of past cases showed no difference in D90 (Gy) or V100 (%) between seed migration or the absence thereof in both the PI group and PI + EBRT group.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00534196

A Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study on accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial brachytherapy: clinical results with a median follow-up of 26 months

BACKGROUND

A Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study on accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial brachytherapy was performed. The first clinical results were reported with a median follow-up of 26 months.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six female breast cancer patients with positive hormone receptors and tumors ≤3 cm, pN0M0, completed the protocol treatment. After breast-conserving surgery and histological confirmation of negative surgical margins and pN0, brachytherapy applicators were implanted either postoperatively (n = 45) or intraoperatively (n = 1). High-dose-rate brachytherapy of 36 Gy/6 fractions was delivered. All clinical data were prospectively collected using case report forms and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver.3.0.

RESULTS

At the median follow-up of 26 months, no breast cancer recurrence of any type was observed. Sequelae ≥G2 were dermatitis (G2, 7 %), fibrosis (G2, 11 %; G3, 4 %), fracture (G2, 2 %), pain (G2, 7 %; G3, 2 %), and soft tissue necrosis (G2, 6 %). Cosmetic outcomes evaluated by excellent/good scores were 100 % at pre-therapy (n = 46), 94 % at 12 months (n = 46), and 81 % at 24 months (n = 36), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Disease control and sequelae were satisfactory due to the strict eligibility and protocol-defined treatment parameters. The cosmetic outcomes were comparable to those of previous Japanese breast-conserving therapy series.

A Japanese prospective multi-institutional feasibility study on accelerated partial breast irradiation using interstitial brachytherapy: treatment planning and quality assurance

BACKGROUND

In Japan, breast-conserving surgery with closed cavity has generally been performed for breast cancer patients, and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is considered difficult because Asian females generally have smaller breast sizes than Western females. Therefore, common identification of target and treatment plan method in APBI is required. A prospective multicenter study was conducted in Japan to determine institutional compliance with APBI using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) designed for Japanese female patients.

METHODS

For this study, 46 patients were recruited at eight institutions from January 2009 to December 2011. The reproducibility of the ISBT-APBI plan was evaluated using three criteria: (1) minimum clinical target volume dose with a clip dose ≥ 6 Gy/fraction, (2) irradiated volume constraint of 40-150 cm(3), and (3) uniformity of dose distribution, expressed as the dose non-uniformity ratio (DNR, V150/V100) < 0.35. The ISBT-APBI plan for each patient was considered reproducible when all three criteria were met. When the number of non-reproducible patients was ≤ 4 at study completion, APBI at this institution was considered statistically reproducible.

RESULTS

Half of the patients (52 %) had a small bra size (A/B cup). The mean values of the dose-constrained parameters were as follows: Vref, 117 cm(3) (range, 40-282), DNR, 0.30 (range, 0.22-0.51), and clip dose, 784 cGy (range, 469-3146). A total of 43/46 treatment plans were judged to be compliant and ISBT-APBI was concluded to be reproducible.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that multi-institutional ISBT-APBI treatment plan was reproducible for small breast patient with closed cavity.

Urinary and Rectal Toxicity Profiles After Permanent Iodine-125 Implant Brachytherapy in Japanese Men: Nationwide J-POPS Multi-institutional Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To assess, in a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study begun in 2005 and in which 6927 subjects were enrolled by 2010, the urinary and rectal toxicity profiles of subjects who enrolled during the first 2 years, and evaluate the toxicity profiles for permanent seed implantation (PI) and a combination therapy with PI and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Baseline data for 2339 subjects out of 2354 patients were available for the analyses. Toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and the International Prostate Symptom Scores were recorded prospectively until 36 months after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Grade 2+ acute urinary toxicities developed in 7.36% (172 of 2337) and grade 2+ acute rectal toxicities developed in 1.03% (24 of 2336) of the patients. Grade 2+ late urinary and rectal toxicities developed in 5.75% (133 of 2312) and 1.86% (43 of 2312) of the patients, respectively. A higher incidence of grade 2+ acute urinary toxicity occurred in the PI group than in the EBRT group (8.49% vs 3.66%; P<.01). Acute rectal toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late urinary toxicities were 6.04% versus 4.82% for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively, with no significant differences between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late rectal toxicities were 0.90% versus 5.01% (P<.01) for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively. The mean of the postimplant International Prostate Symptom Score peaked at 3 months, but it decreased to a range that was within 2 points of the baseline score, which was observed in 1625 subjects (69.47%) at the 1-year follow-up assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The acute urinary toxicities observed were acceptable given the frequency and retention, and the late rectal toxicities were more favorable than those of other studies.

Results of central pathology review of prostatic biopsies in a contemporary series from a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804)

To investigate contemporary rates of variation in the biopsy Gleason grading in prostate cancer, between local and central pathologists, based on central review of the pathological slides from Seed and Hormone for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (SHIP) 0804, a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. From April 2008 to May 2011, 18 Japanese institutions participated. All H&E slides were reviewed independently, without clinical information, and a tumor grade was assigned according to the modified Gleason grading system proposed by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). Prostate biopsy specimens of 642 cases were available for evaluation. An exact concordance rate of Gleason score (GS) between local and central pathologists was determined to be 65.3%; with the under-grading and over-grading of grades to be 14.6% and 20.1%, respectively. The central review resulted in numbers of tumor-bearing cores reassigned in 99 of 616 cases in which such information by the local pathologists was available (16.1%). Discordance in biopsy Gleason grading was still found in one third of the cases in the SHIP0804 study. This information is valuable in extrapolating the diagnostic error range in contemporary clinical studies conducted without central pathological review.

Postmortem radiation safety and issues pertaining to permanent prostate seed implantation in Japan

PURPOSE

If a prostate cancer patient treated with (125)I brachytherapy dies within 12 months after the treatment, prostate removal before cremation is recommended to avoid problems related to radioactivity in the ashes, such as inhalation of airborne particulate matter by crematorium staff or nearby residents. To provide guidance for such cases, a manual prepared under the editorial supervision of several professional associations was issued in 2008 in Japan. Herein, we investigated the incidence and causes of death, and the actions taken subsequent to death, among prostate cancer patients who died within 12 months after (125)I brachytherapy over a 10-year period in Japan; and we compared the results before and after the manual was issued.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data extracted from the Japan Radioisotope Association database for the period from September 2003 to the end of December 2013 were used.

RESULTS

Of 27,976 patients who underwent (125)I brachytherapy during the specified period, 79 died within 12 months after implantation, including 3 who died in the 2011 earthquake and tsunami. The prostate and brachytherapy source were retrieved at autopsy from 69 of the 79 patients. Autopsy could not be performed on the other 10 patients, 2 of whom died in the earthquake. Autopsy and retrieval of the brachytherapy source were significantly more common after issuance of the manual than before (22/28 cases before; 47/49 cases after; p=0.021).

CONCLUSION

In most cases of early death after (125)I brachytherapy in Japan, the brachytherapy source was retrieved.

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS)

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) for prostate cancer. The nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) has continued since July 2005. This manuscript presents the rationale, J-POPS study design, and the characteristics of initial participants enrolled in this study from July 2005 to June 2007.

METHODS

All participants were treated with PI in accordance with the American Brachytherapy Society recommendations. The primary outcome measure was biochemical progression-free survival. Progression-free survival, overall survival, cause-specific survival, longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life, disease-specific quality of life, the International Prostate Symptom Score, and the incidence of adverse events were also investigated as secondary outcome measurements.

RESULTS

Overall, 6,927 patients were enrolled by the end of 2010, that is approximately 40 % of all cases treated around the country. During the first 2 years, 2,354 participants were enrolled and 2,339 were actually treated with PI. The age range of participants was 45 to 89 years (median 69 years) and their risk classifications were 1,037 (44.3 %) at low risk, 1,126 (48.1 %) at intermediate risk, and 134 (5.7 %) at high risk, in addition to 16 participants whose classification was unknown. Of all patients, 76.6 % were treated with PI without external beam radiation therapy and 49.3 % received neoadjuvant hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The J-POPS, a nationwide prospective cohort study that enrolled approximately 40 % of all PI cases in Japan, will provide highly reliable evidence, including outcomes and quality of life, after long-term follow-up.

Rectal toxicity after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Nationwide cohort study in Japan (J-POPS)

73

Background: The purpose of this report is to describe acute and late rectal toxicities and to evaluate factors associated with rectal toxicity in permanent seed implantation (PI) patients enrolled in a nationwide cohort study in Japan. Methods: A total of 2,339 patients in 46 institutes were evaluated. They were treated in the nationwide cohort study entitled Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent I-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) during the first two years, until June 2007. Rectal toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0, which were obtained at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after completion of radiotherapy. The odds ratios (OR) of factors associated with greater than or equal to grade 2 rectal toxicity were calculated using a logistic regression model, and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: Greater than or equal to grade 2 rectal toxicities were seen in 2.8% of all patients (1.7% in the PI monotherapy group and 6.4% in the external beam radiation therapy [EBRT] combination therapy group). On multivariate analysis, among all patients, greater than or equal to grade 2 rectal toxicity was associated with rectal volumes receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R100) (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.39–2.68) and EBRT addition (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.39–6.32). R100 in the PI monotherapy group (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.06–2.64), and R100 (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30–3.30) and interactive planning (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23–0.92) in the EBRT combination therapy group were also associated with greater than or equal to grade 2 toxicity. Greater than or equal to grade 2 toxicity was seen in 3.7% and 1.4% of patients with R100 greater than or equal to 1 ml and R100 less than 1 ml, respectively, in the PI monotherapy group (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.28–6.05) and in 14.1% and 5.4% of patients with R100 greater than or equal to 1 ml and R100 less than 1 ml, respectively, in the EBRT combination therapy group (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.28–6.45). Conclusions: Rectal toxicity was relatively limited compared to other reports. For Japanese PI patients, R100 should be less than 1 ml, both in PI monotherapy and in EBRT combination therapy, and interactive planning should be performed for EBRT combination therapy.

A newly introduced comprehensive consultation fee in the national health insurance system in Japan: a promotive effect of multidisciplinary medical care in the field of radiation oncology--results from a questionnaire survey

OBJECTIVE

The consultation fee for outpatient radiotherapy was newly introduced in the national health insurance system in Japan in April 2012. We conducted a survey on the use of this consultation fee and its effect on clinical practices.

METHODS

The health insurance committee of the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology conducted a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire form was mailed to 160 councilors of the Society, the target questionees. A total of 94 answers (58% of the target questionees) sent back were used for analyses.

RESULTS

The analyses revealed that 75% of the hospitals charged most of the patients who receive radiotherapy in an outpatient setting a consultation fee. The introduction of the consultation fee led to some changes in radiation oncology clinics, as evidenced by the response of 'more careful observations by medical staff' in 37% of questionees and a 12% increase in the number of full-time radiation oncology nurses. It was also shown that the vast majority (92%) of radiation oncologists expected a positive influence of the consultation fee on radiation oncology clinics in Japan.

CONCLUSIONS

Our questionnaire survey revealed the present status of the use of a newly introduced consultation fee for outpatient radiotherapy, and the results suggested its possible effect on promoting a multidisciplinary medical care system in radiation oncology departments in Japan.

Japanese nationwide multi-institutional cohort study of prostate cancer brachytherapy with permanent seed implantation

e16090

Background: Brachytherapy with permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (PI) has been approved in 2003 in Japan. Multi-institutional cohort study (Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Seed Implantation; J-POPS, NCT00534196) assessing the treatment feature, efficacy, safety and health-related quality of life (QOL) has started in July 2005. Six thousand nine hundred and twenty-seven cases were enrolled to this study until December 2010 from 68 institutes around the country, which is approximately 40% of all the cases treated in Japan at that time. Methods: Patient’s background, cancer character, treatment feature such as combined therapy of external beam or hormone, post PI dosimetric information, treatment efficacy with PSA level, voiding symptoms with IPSS and treatment related adverse events according to NCI-CTCAE are investigated. PSA was measured every 3 months and symptoms accompanied to the treatment were assessed 3 to 6 months after the treatment. Backgrounds and treatment assessments of 2,341 patients enrolled in J-POPS during the initial 2 years are evaluated. Results: Patients’ age ranged from 45 to 89 (median 69) year-old and 99.0% of the cases were performance status 0 (ECOG criteria). Family history of prostate cancer was seen in 6.2%. PSA levels on cancer diagnosis were 1.60 to 42.0 (mean 6.80) ng/ml, clinical stage T2a or less was 89.9%, T2b was 5.2%, T2c was 2.9% and T3a-T3b was 0.8%. Gleason score (GS) less than 7 was 56.6%, GS 7 was 39.7%, and GS above 7 was 3.6%. According to NCCN risk classification, 44.2% was classified as low risk, 48.3% as intermediate risk and 5.7% as high risk. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was performed in 48.5% of the patients and 23.4% was combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). CT scan based first post therapeutic month dosimetry revealed that prostatic mean V100 and D90 for the cases treated with seed alone were 94.8% and 160.7 Gy, respectively. As for adequate control of radiation dose at rectum (mean R100 = 0.3 cc) and urethra (mean D5 = 223.4 Gy), high grade toxicities appeared very seldom. Conclusions: Outcomes of J-POPS will produce clinical evidence of PI that can be internationally accepted.

Diffusion pattern of low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer in Japan

Permanent implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer using iodine-125 seeds was adopted in Japan in 2003. Here, we report on the diffusion pattern of this treatment in Japan since 2003. We examined the annual numbers of prostate cancer patients per hospital in Japan, who were treated with iodine-125 seed implant brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation therapy between 2003 and 2011. The hospitals were excluded from the count if brachytherapy was begun in a hospital within the given year, and thus was only available for part of the year. In 2004, 269 patients were treated by brachytherapy at only two hospitals. However, the numbers increased rapidly. A total of 1412 patients were treated at 23 hospitals in 2005, 2783 patients were treated at 83 hospitals in 2008, and 3793 patients were treated at 109 hospitals in 2011. The mean/median numbers of patients treated per hospital were 61.4/42 in 2005, 33.5/25 in 2008, and 35.0/24 in 2011. The number of hospitals where 24 or fewer patients were treated in a year increased. On the other hand, the number of hospitals with a volume of >48 patients per year was stable. Because a relationship between provider volume and outcomes following oncological procedures was shown, a careful evaluation of the effectiveness of permanent implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer is needed.

Source strength assay of iodine-125 seeds sealed within sterile packaging

Early‐stage prostate cancer is widely treated by iodine‐125 (I‐125) seed implantation. While quality assurance methods are in place to assure consistency in I‐125 seed source strength, current methods involve the breaking of the sterilization package, raising issues concerning sterility and time limitations. The purpose of this study was to develop a method of characterizing the total source strength of I‐125 seeds within a cartridge that has been sealed within a sterilization package and to evaluate the probability of detecting an out‐of‐calibration seed (aberrant seed). We defined a protocol to determine the ability of a well‐type ionization chamber to detect aberrant I‐125 seeds within a cartridge sealed in the sterilization package. A novel jig for a well‐type ionization chamber was designed to accommodate the sterilization package. One seed was chosen randomly from two cartridges containing five or 15 seeds (0.544 U source strength) and was exchanged with aberrant seeds of six different source strengths. The source strength was measured at each position within the cartridge. The results indicated that the response of the well chamber was sensitive to changes in the aberrant seed position within the cartridge and the source strength of the aberrant seed. The correlation coefficient between single seed and batch assay results was high (0.998). A novel jig and a measurement method using a well ionization chamber were developed, which allowed for a batch assay characterization of the total source strength of I‐125 seeds within a cartridge sealed within sterilization package. This method is simple, time‐saving, and offers greater practical application.

PACS number: D6.20.Dk

Tri-Modality therapy with I-125 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and short- or long-term hormone therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer (TRIP): study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Background

Patients with high Gleason score, elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, and advanced clinical stage are at increased risk for both local and systemic relapse. Recent data suggests higher radiation doses decrease local recurrence and may ultimately benefit biochemical, metastasis-free and disease-specific survival. No randomized data is available on the benefits of long-term hormonal therapy (HT) in these patients. A prospective study on the efficacy and safety of trimodality treatment consisting of HT, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and brachytherapy (BT) for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is strongly required.

Methods/Design

This is a phase III, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of trimodality with BT, EBRT, and HT for high-risk PCa (TRIP) that will investigate the impact of adjuvant HT following BT using iodine-125 (¹²⁵I-BT) and supplemental EBRT with neoadjuvant and concurrent HT. Prior to the end of September 2012, a total of 340 patients with high-risk PCa will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms. These patients will be recruited from more than 41 institutions, all of which have broad experience with ¹²⁵I-BT. Pathological slides will be centrally reviewed to confirm patient eligibility. The patients will commonly undergo 6-month HT with combined androgen blockade (CAB) before and during ¹²⁵I-BT and supplemental EBRT. Those randomly assigned to the long-term HT group will subsequently undergo 2 years of adjuvant HT with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. All participants will be assessed at baseline and every 3 months for the first 30 months, then every 6 months until 84 months from the beginning of CAB.

The primary endpoint is biochemical progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, clinical progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, salvage therapy non-adaptive interval, and adverse events.

Discussion

To our knowledge, there have been no prospective studies documenting the efficacy and safety of trimodality therapy for high-risk PCa. The present RCT is expected to provide additional insight regarding the potency and limitations of the addition of 2 years of adjuvant HT to this trimodality approach, and to establish an appropriate treatment strategy for high-risk PCa.

Trial registration

UMIN000003992

Deaths within 12 months after (125)I implantation for brachytherapy of prostate cancer: an investigation of radiation safety issues in Japan (2003-2010)

PURPOSE

The International Commission on Radiological Protection recommends removing the prostate before cremation if death occurs within 12 months after (125)I brachytherapy. However, the incidence of death within this time frame has not been robustly investigated in any country. The purpose this study was to investigate the incidence and cause of death and actions taken when death has occurred within 12 months after (125)I brachytherapy for prostate cancer in Japan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were extracted from the Japan Radioisotope Association database to investigate the total number of implantation cases, number of early deaths after implantation, cause of death, and postmortem actions between September 2003 and the end of June 2010 in Japan. Early death was defined as occurring within 12 months after (125)I brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

RESULTS

During the study period, 15,427 patients underwent (125)I brachytherapy and 43 (0.28%) died within 12 months after implantation. For 37 of the 43 patients (86%), the brachytherapy source was retrieved together with the prostate gland at autopsy; however, autopsy could not be performed in six (14%) of the deceased patients. The largest proportion of early deaths was because of cerebrovascular or cardiovascular disease (17/43, 40%), followed by malignant tumor (15/43, 35%), and respiratory disease or infection (7/43, 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of early deaths within 12 months after (125)I brachytherapy in Japan was 0.28%. In almost all cases, the brachytherapy sources were removed in the intact prostate before the body was cremated and stored appropriately.

[CyberKnife radiotherapy for head and neck cancer]

Locoregional failure after radiation therapy is a significant problem in the management of head and neck cancer. Reirradiation is rarely used in conventional radiation therapy because of concerns about treatment-related toxicity and lack of efficacy. However, stereotactic radiotherapy, which was made possible by the advancement in therapeutic devices enables reirradiation. The CyberKnife system is one of the best devices for stereotactic radiotherapy. We discuss salvage treatment, including reirradiation using the CyberKnife system, in patients with locally recurrent head and neck cancer patients.

Transperineal prostate brachytherapy, using I-125 seed with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation, in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: study protocol for a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

Background

The optimal protocol for ¹²⁵I-transperineal prostatic brachytherapy (TPPB) in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients remains controversial. Data on the efficacy of combining androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with ¹²⁵I-TPPB in this group remain limited and consequently the guidelines of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) provide no firm recommendations.

Methods/Design

Seed and Hormone for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (SHIP) 0804 is a phase III, multicenter, randomized, controlled study that will investigate the impact of adjuvant ADT following neoadjuvant ADT and ¹²⁵I-TPPB. Prior to the end of March, 2011, a total of 420 patients with intermediate-risk, localized PCa will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms. These patients will be recruited from 20 institutions, all of which have broad experience of ¹²⁵I-TPPB. Pathological slides will be centrally reviewed to confirm patient eligibility. The patients will initially undergo 3-month ADT prior to ¹²⁵I-TPPB. Those randomly assigned to adjuvant therapy will subsequently undergo 9 months of adjuvant ADT. All participants will be assessed at baseline and at the following intervals: every 3 months for the first 24 months following ¹²⁵I-TPPB, every 6 months during the 24- to 60-month post-¹²⁵I-TPPB interval, annually between 60 and 84 months post-¹²⁵I-TPPB, and on the 10th anniversary of treatment.

The primary endpoint is biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), clinical progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, salvage therapy non-adaptive interval, acceptability (assessed using the international prostate symptom score [IPSS]), quality of life (QOL) evaluation, and adverse events. In the correlative study (SHIP36B), we also evaluate biopsy results at 36 months following treatment to examine the relationship between the results and the eventual recurrence after completion of radiotherapy.

Discussion

These two multicenter trials (SHIP0804 & SHIP36B) are expected to provide crucial data regarding the efficacy, acceptability and safety of adjuvant ADT. SHIP36B will also provide important information about the prognostic implications of PSA levels in intermediate-risk PCa patients treated with ¹²⁵I-TPPB.

Trial registration

NCT00664456, NCT00898326, JUSMH-BRI-GU05-01, JUSMH-TRIGU0709

Three-year results of treatment for prostate cancer with low-dose rate temporary iridium-192 brachytherapy

AIM

To report the 3-year treatment results of definitive irradiation by using a temporary interstitial implant with low-dose rate iridium-192 with or without external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

One-hundred and forty-three patients with pathologically defined prostate carcinoma were treated from December 1997 to April 2003. The patients were classified into a low-risk group (T2, PSA<or=20 ng/mL and Gleason score<or=6) or a high-risk group (T3, PSA>20 ng/mL or Gleason score>or=7). Low-risk patients were treated with low-dose-rate iridium brachytherapy as monotherapy delivering 70 Gy. High-risk patients were treated with the combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy delivering 40 Gy and 36 Gy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival rate were analysed. To assess the treatment quality in different periods, PSA progression-free survival rates in late era (year of 2000 and after) and in early era (before 2000) were compared. Morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading scale.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen patients were analysed, of which 86 patients underwent monotherapy with an iridium implant, and 33 were treated with the combination of external beam radiotherapy. Twenty-four patients were excluded from the analysis because the classification of risk group did not suit the criteria. The total (n=119) PSA progression-free survival rate at 3 years was 80.3%. The PSA progression-free survival rate at 3 years for the monotherapy group (n=86) and the combination therapy group (n=33) were 78.2% and 86.9%, respectively. There were 23 patients who were followed for more than 36 to 63 months, and, during this period, only 1 patient who received the monotherapy was diagnosed as PSA failure at 50 months. The 3-year PSA progression-free survival rate of monotherapy in late era was significantly higher than that in early era; however, no significant difference was seen in the combination treatment. Morbidity for the combination treatment was low; however, for the monotherapy, three patients developed severe rectal ulcers, and colostomies were made.

CONCLUSIONS

The PSA progression-free survival rate after low-dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy can be satisfactory and longer follow up is necessary to compare the efficacy of other treatments.

[Experience of brachytherapy using I-125 seed permanent implants for localized prostate cancer]

PURPOSE

We report here our experience of brachytherapy using I-125 seeds for localized prostate cancer in 100 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out brachytherapy with I-125 seed permanent implants in 100 patients with localized prostate cancer between September 2003 and October 2004. Preplanning dosimetry was done using transrectal ultrasonic images obtained three or four weeks prior to treatment. Using transrectal ultrasound, we inserted I-125 seeds in the prostate through needles according to the preplanning diagram. We then examined the results on prostate CT performed one month later.

RESULTS

It was necessary to describe transrectal ultrasonic image such as preplanning. There were several cases in which the source arrangement of the schedule was corrected immediately before the operation. In the examination after one month, the numerical value at the start of treatment initially was not satisfactory, but we eventually obtained a result that could to be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

We carried out permanent implant brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer using I-125 seeds and reported our experience.

[Pulmonary embolization of permanently implanted radioactive iodine-125 seeds for carcinoma of the prostate]

One year has passed since we started brachytherapy with radioactive iodine-125 seeds for carcinoma of the prostate. During the follow-up of patients, we have relatively frequently found migrated seeds in the lungs. Migrated seeds are reported to reach mainly the pulmonary artery and cause embolization without clinical symptoms. We counted the embolized seeds and determined the proportion of migrating seeds on chest X-ray exam. We found 47 cases of pulmonary embolization in our initial 100 cases. Less than half of the embolization were found in the chest X-ray exam performed on the next day after the implantation. We found more migrated seeds in the lower lung fields than in the upper and middle lung fields. Pulmonary embolization of implanted iodine-125 seeds is not unusual, and cases of prostate brachytherapy are likely to increase in Japan. We will have increased opportunities to observe chest X-ray films with migrated seeds in the future.

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer in Japan

The temporary implantation of iridium-192 (Ir-192) is available in Japan if the patient is isolated in a radiation control area during the treatment. In this study, brachytherapy for prostate cancer was preceded by using low-dose rate Ir-192. Twenty-six patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy since December 1997. The age of patients ranged from 61 to 82 (median 76) years and the initial serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ranged from 4.3 to 141 (median 17.4) ng/ml. Ten to 14 needles with Teflon sheaths were introduced into the prostate via a transperineal approach and an Ir-192 wire was placed in each sheath. The dose-distribution curve based on computed tomography imaging was drawn and the irradiation time was calculated for the whole prostate to receive over 70 Gy. During the 1-22-month follow-up period, all cases with an initial PSA level of less than 25 ng/ml showed continuous PSA decrease without biochemical failure. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated tumor regression in all cases within 6 months after the treatment. One-year biopsy specimens from patients with PSA failure demonstrated viable tumor cells, and the specimens from patients with favorable progress revealed fibrosis replacement without any variable tumor cells. Characterization of nocturnal penile tumescence data and IIEF 15 score proved the minimal effect of the treatment on erectile function. No major side effects or complications were observed. Brachytherapy using Ir-192 is a less invasive and safe procedure, which is expected to become a standard treatment for localized prostate cancer patients with relatively low PSA levels.

[The brachytherapy with low dose-rate iridium for prostate cancer]

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy as an option for the treatment of prostate cancer has been commonly performed in USA. As the permanent seeding of the radioactive materials is strictly restricted by the law in Japan, brachytherapy must be performed by the temporary implant. This treatment has been performed at a few facilities in Japan mostly using high dose-rate iridium. Only our facility has been using low dose-rate iridium (LDR-Ir) for prostate cancer. This study evaluates the clinical results of the treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since December 1997 to December 1999, 26 patients with histologically diagnosed as prostate cancer (Stage B, 92%; Stage C, 8%) underwent brachytherapy. Twenty-two patients received brachytherapy alone, three were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (ERT) and one was treated with a combination of brachytherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients ranged in age from 61 to 84 (median 76) years old. Treatment was initiated with perineal needle placement. From 10 to 14 needles were placed through the holes on the template which was fixed to the stabilizer of the transrectal ultrasound probe. After the needle placement. CT scan was performed to draw distribution curves for the treatment planning. LDR-Ir wires were introduced to the sheath and indwelled during the time calculated from dosimetry. Peripheral dose was 70 Gy for the monotherapy of brachytherapy. For the combination therapy, 40 Gy was given by brachytherapy and 36 Gy with ERT afterwards. LDR-Ir wires were removed after completion of the radiation and patients were followed with serum PSA level and annual biopsy.

RESULTS

During 2 to 26 (median 12) months follow-up, 8 out of 9 patients with initial PSA level above 20 ng/ml showed PSA failure. All 13 patients with initial PSA level lower than 20 ng/ml were free from PSA failure. Eight out of 11 patients with Gleason's score 7 or higher showed PSA failure, and all 14 patients (including three patients with combined therapy) with Gleason's score 6 or less were free from PSA failure. Annual biopsy was performed in 8 patients, and 4 patients histologically revealed tumor free and 4 patients (two of them showed PSA failure) were tumor positive. No major complication was observed, however, some minor side-effect as irritability was seen in 65% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that brachytherapy with LDR-Ir was an acceptable treatment as long as the patients were selected strictly with PSA level and Gleason's score. A good candidate for this treatment is the patient whose PSA level is lower than 20 ng/ml and Gleason's score is 6 or less. The treatment is effective and safe, but further observation is necessary to reach the conclusion.

Multi-institutional randomized trial of external radiotherapy with and without intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer in Japan. Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group

PURPOSE

With the aim of improving the results of treatment of esophageal cancer, we designed this multi-institutional, randomized trial to establish the optimal irradiation method in radical radiation therapy for esophageal cancer by clinically evaluating external irradiation alone and in combination with intraluminal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study population consisted of patients with squamous cell carcinoma who were expected to be successfully treated with radical radiation therapy. The patients who could be given intraluminal brachytherapy at the end of external irradiation of 60 Gy were stratified into 2 groups. Patients assigned to receive external irradiation alone received boost irradiation of 10 Gy/week on a schedule similar to the previous one, and with the same or smaller irradiation field. Intraluminal brachytherapy was performed, as a rule, with the reference dose point set at a depth of 5 mm of the esophageal submucosa, and a total of 10 Gy was irradiated at a daily dose of 5 Gy, on a once-weekly schedule with low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy equipment.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were registered, 94 of whom were analyzable, with 8 ineligible, and 1 for whom complete information was unavailable. The overall cumulative survival rate was 20.3% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate was 31.8% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate at 5 years was 27% in the external irradiation alone group and 38% in intraluminal brachytherapy combined group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.385). However, in the patients with 5 cm or less tumor length, the cause-specific survival rate was 64% at 5 years in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group, which showed a significant improvement over 31.5% in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.025). In the patients with Stage T1 and T2 disease, cause-specific survival rates tended to be better in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group than in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.088). In the patients with more than 5 cm tumor length or Stage T3-4 disease, there were no significant differences between the two groups by treatment methods (p = 0.290). The incidence of early and late complications did not differ according to whether intraluminal brachytherapy was used.

CONCLUSION

For the purpose of establishing the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, further prospective randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy in tumors with short length and those with shallow invasion, or to assess the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, as additional irradiation in large advanced tumors have been shown to have disappeared by diagnostic imaging after chemoradiotherapy with 60 Gy/6w external irradiation.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy, toxicity, and the optimum dose of high-dose-rate brachytherapy following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with a historical group of patients treated with a combination of external beam and brachytherapy (RT alone).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-three patients with localized esophageal cancer received concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was a combination of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 continuous infusion from days 1-4 during the first and last week of external irradiation. Radiotherapy consisted of external irradiation to a total dose of 40-61 Gy (median 50 Gy) and brachytherapy to 8-24 Gy (median 16 Gy) in 2-4 fractions.

RESULTS

Acute toxicity was well tolerated. A fistula occurred in one patient 1 week after completion of external irradiation. Local control was achieved in 32/53 (60%) compared with 42% of the RT group (p = 0.029). Local control rates of the CRT group were significantly better than those of the RT group in Stages II and III. Late toxicity (esophageal ulceration and strictures) occurred in 18 (34%) of the CRT group compared with 12% in the RT group (p = 0.013). Severe late toxicity (RTOG/EORTC criteria Grade 3-4) occurred in six patients (15%) whose chemotherapy was followed by 16-24 Gy via brachytherapy compared with 2.5% in the RT group (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

Combined chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy boost achieved better local control than radiotherapy alone. However, a high level of severe late toxicity was observed especially with 16-24 Gy via brachytherapy.

Curative radiotherapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for localized esophageal carcinoma: dose-effect relationship of brachytherapy with the balloon type applicator system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study analyzed the feasibility, local control and toxicity in potentially curable patients with esophageal carcinoma treated with a combination of external irradiation and high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy using a balloon type applicator system to minimize hot spots on the mucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the 9 years, 124 patients with esophageal carcinoma and no apparent extraesophageal spread were treated with 40-60 Gy of external irradiation followed by 8-24 Gy of HDR brachytherapy. The fraction size of brachytherapy was 4-6 Gy. We developed a new applicator with 15 mm external diameter inflatable balloons. The reference point was a point 12.5 mm depth from the mid source. The study end points were local control, late toxicity and palliative effect.

RESULTS

All 124 patients completed the planned radiotherapy. Local control rate was 69/124 (56%). There was a trend toward better local control rate for T1 lesions with increasing dose via brachytherapy. Of 69 patients with local control, treatment-related ulcers occurred in 28 patients, leading to death in four. The incidence of ulcers increased with increasing brachytherapy dose; 1/6 with 12 Gy, 16/43 with 16 Gy, 6/ 12 with 20 Gy, 4/5 with 24 Gy. Esophageal benign strictures occurred in ten patients and in all cases developed from ulcers. The incidence of freedom from dysphagia was not dose-dependent.

CONCLUSION

A combination of external irradiation and HDR brachytherapy with the balloon type applicator was feasible and well tolerated. Although better local control was achieved by a higher dose of brachytherapy, the higher dose caused more severe esophageal injury.

[Schedule of stereotactic radiotherapy: a study considering the factors of repair and cell proliferation]

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS: stereotactic irradiation [STI] delivered in a single high dose) was initially developed by Leksell for non-malignant brain lesions, but there has been increasing interest in using it to treat small primary brain tumors or metastases. Recently, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT: fractionated STI) has been recommended on the basis of radiobiological considerations for tumors in which both normal glial cells and tumor cells reside within the tumor margin. Strangely, the factors 'repair' and 'cell proliferation' have been neglected in the radiobiological evaluations of STI reported so far, mainly because of the complexity of the calculations. 'Half-time repair' which is the key value in the 'repair' factor may be larger for nervous tissue than for many other normal tissues because nerve cells have decreased ability to recover from damage. 'Cell proliferation' should be an important factor when the total radiation period is extended by applying SRT. In this study, we created models based on estimated 'half-time repair' and 'cell doubling time' and attempted to determine optimal SRT schedules. When repair and cell proliferation factors are also taken into consideration, the recommended SRT schedules would be 7 Gy x 7 fractions every other day for malignant tumors and 3.5 Gy x 12 fractions every other day for benign tumors. However, clinically, these schedules should be modified according to factors in individual cases, e. g., tumor size, presence of tumor necrosis, the patient's general condition, prognosis, and so on.