The Value of Virtual Meetings during COVID-19 Pandemic in Healthcare Settings

Introduction/Objective

The coronavirus pandemic led to an unprecedented rise in using virtual meeting technology in the healthcare sector for conferences, business meetings, and continuous medical education. This study aims to understand the practices and individual preferences and to highlight the benefits and challenges of virtual meetings compared to in-person ones.

Methods/Case Report

This cross-sectional study was disseminated via email as an online survey, using SurveyMonkey (Momentive Inc. San Mateo, California, USA) and targeted healthcare providers at the King Hussein Cancer Center-Amman, Jordan.

Results (if a Case Study enter NA)

A total of 342 healthcare providers took part in this questionnaire. 82.5% of respondents reported participating in virtual meetings; of those, only 33.5% preferred virtual over in-person meetings (PrV). Whether virtual meetings were equivalent to in-person ones, 33.2% of all participants (71.4% of the PrV) said virtual meetings were equivalent to in-person meetings in terms of participants’ attention (p<0.001). Additionally 54.8% of all participants believed their gain level was less in virtual meetings compared to the conventional in-person ones; this percentage differs significantly between the participant's group who preferred in-person (PrP) over virtual meetings and the PV group who believed otherwise (75.0% vs 13.2%, p<0.001). Nonetheless, when respondents were asked about their meeting preferences in the event of a pandemic, 49.5% of all healthcare providers preferred virtual over in-person meetings (91.3% of the PrV group p<0.001). Almost half the participants (54.3%) reported that they tend to temporarily leave virtual meetings before it is over, yet, this percentage rockets to 70.0% if the meeting is over 2 hours long. On the other hand 43.3% of respondents admitted to leaving the meeting physically while keeping themselves logged in on their mobile/computer. An interesting result of the survey was that 58.3% of all respondents preferred to attend virtual meetings during working hours (85.7% of the PrV group, p<0.001). Finally, when asked about performing other tasks while in a virtual meeting, the vast majority (82.6%) of respondents confirmed either answering the phone, reading/sending emails, or checking a social media outlet at least once, which contributes to a lack of adequate concentration.

Conclusion

Healthcare providers still prefer and attach more value and benifit to in-person interactions

Changing Trends in Estrogen Receptors/Progesterone Receptors/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Prevalence Rates Among Jordanian Patients With Breast Cancer Over the Years

PURPOSE

Estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are the mainstay of breast cancer management, and their prevalence rates vary among different populations possibly related to ethnic/genetic and/or socioeconomic status. In a previous study conducted at the King Hussein Cancer Center (published 2006), Jordan ER/PR/HER2 rates for patients diagnosed in 2003-2004 were 50.8%/57.5%/17.5%, respectively. The aim of this study is to revisit the prevalence rates to see if they have changed over the years with changing socioeconomic status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrieved clinicopathologic data of all patients (1,185) diagnosed with breast cancer during 2018. The data included age, histologic type, grade, and ER/PR/HER2 status as determined by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 52 (median = 51, range = 25-92) years, and the majority (73.2%) had invasive carcinoma of no special type. ER/PR/HER2 were 77.0%/72.4%./23.8%, respectively. Triple-negative breast cancers were 10.1%. In comparison with previous results of 2006, the changes are statistically significant. Similar changes were seen in other Middle Eastern populations. The current rates are close to those of Western populations.

CONCLUSION

Rates of ER/PR/HER2 expression have significantly changed and are close to those of Western populations for ER/PR. We propose that such changes are secondary to the adoption of a westernized lifestyle and socioeconomic changes.

PD-L1 Expression Harmonization in Gastric Cancer Using 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assays

The immune checkpoint inhibitor Pembrolizumab has been FDA-approved for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer in patients who fail second-line therapy and test positive by a companion programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) assay, the 22C3 PharmDx. It would be useful to investigate the potential interchangeability of other PD-L1 assays in order to develop a more sustainable diagnostic strategy. We investigated the possibility of harmonizing different PD-L1 assays, utilizing samples from 94 GC and GEJ patients to compare their expression using 2 laboratory developed tests (LDTs): The Dako 22C3 antibody and the Ventana SP263 run on the Ventana platform with the FDA-approved companion diagnostic test, the 22C3 PharmDx. This would be the first report assessing the 22C3 on Ventana's platform in GC. Pearson correlation coefficients between the Dako 22C3 PharmDx and the 22C3-LDT and the Ventana SP263 assays were 0.965 (P<0.001) and 0.932 (P<0.001), respectively, which indicates an almost perfect correlation. The sensitivity and specificity were also high at different cutoffs [both 100% at combined positive score (CPS)≥1 and 92.59% and 95.52% at CPS≥10, respectively] for the comparison between Dako 22C3/22C3-LDT assays. As for the sensitivity and specificity between the Dako 22C3/Ventana SP263 assays the results were 100% and 95.67% at CPS≥1; and 96.30% and 95.52% at CPS≥10, respectively. In conclusion, the analytical performance of 22C3 and SP263 clones on the Ventana platform was close to that of the reference assay (Dako 22C3 assay), suggesting that the 2 LDTs can be utilized interchangeably with the FDA-approved standard assay as an aid to select GC and GEJ patients for Pembrolizumab treatment.

Expression of PD-L1 using SP142 CDx in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a small subtype of breast cancer yet it has the worst outcome. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy was recently approved by the FDA raising the hope for an improved outcome. The approval was based on demonstration of a positive PD-L1 expression using the SP142 CDx assay ¹. We aimed to study a cohort of TNBC patients in terms of prevalence of the PD-L1 expression using the approved assay and to investigate its association with clinicopathological variables. This is a single center retrospective study consisting of 49 TNBC patients who had available archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from the primary tumors. All blocks were stained using the SP142 CDx assay as per the manufacture's instruction. Clinicopathological data were collected from medical records. Eighteen of the 49 (36.7%) patients were found to have a score of 1% or more by the immune cell-scoring algorithm. PDL-1 expression was significantly associated with the degree of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). No additional significant relationship was found between PD-L1 expression and any of the other investigated clinicopathological variables. Although a trend of favorable prognostic association with PD-L1 expression was noted. The overall and event free survival were significantly related to pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Our PD-L1 rate of 36.7% is close to the results of the previously reported 40.9% in the IMpassion 130 trial. There were no significant association between positive PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological variables however a trend of a favorable outcome was observed.

Expression of PD-L1 using SP142 CDx in triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a small subtype of breast cancer yet it has the worst outcome. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy was recently approved by the FDA raising the hope for an improved outcome. The approval was based on demonstration of a positive PD-L1 expression using the SP142 CDx assay ¹. We aimed to study a cohort of TNBC patients in terms of prevalence of the PD-L1 expression using the approved assay and to investigate its association with clinicopathological variables. This is a single center retrospective study consisting of 49 TNBC patients who had available archived paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from the primary tumors. All blocks were stained using the SP142 CDx assay as per the manufacture's instruction. Clinicopathological data were collected from medical records. Eighteen of the 49 (36.7%) patients were found to have a score of 1% or more by the immune cell-scoring algorithm. PDL-1 expression was significantly associated with the degree of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). No additional significant relationship was found between PD-L1 expression and any of the other investigated clinicopathological variables. Although a trend of favorable prognostic association with PD-L1 expression was noted. The overall and event free survival were significantly related to pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Our PD-L1 rate of 36.7% is close to the results of the previously reported 40.9% in the IMpassion 130 trial. There were no significant association between positive PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological variables however a trend of a favorable outcome was observed.