Phantosmia during proton radiation and differences in frequency of phantosmia rates based on proton craniospinal irradiation technique for pediatric brain tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Unusual olfactory perception, often referred to as "phantosmia" or "cacosmia" has been reported during brain radiotherapy (RT), but is infrequent and does not typically interfere with the ability to deliver treatment. We seek to determine the rate of phantosmia for patients treated with proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and identify any potential clinical or treatment-related associations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 127 pediatric patients treated with CSI, followed by a boost to the brain for primary brain tumors in a single institution between 2016 and 2021. Proton CSI was delivered with passive scattering (PS) proton technique (n = 53) or pencil beam scanning technique (PBS) (n = 74). Within the PBS group, treatment delivery to the CSI utilized a single posterior (PA) field (n = 24) or two posterior oblique fields (n = 50). We collected data on phantom smell, nausea/vomiting, and the use of medical intervention.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 80 males and 47 females. The median age of patients was 10 years (range: 3-21). Seventy-one patients (56%) received concurrent chemotherapy. During RT, 104 patients (82%) developed worsening nausea, while 63 patients (50%) reported episodes of emesis. Of those patients who were awake during CSI (n = 59), 17 (29%) reported phantosmia. In the non-sedated group, we found a higher rate of phantosmia in patients treated with PBS (n = 16, 42%) than PS (n = 1, 4.7%) (p = .002). Seventy-eight patients (61%) required medical intervention after developing nausea/vomiting or phantosmia during RT. Two patients required sedation due to the malodorous smell during CSI. We did not find any significant difference in nausea/vomiting based on treatment technique.

CONCLUSION

Proton technique significantly influenced olfactory perception with greater rates of phantosmia with PBS compared to PS. Prospective studies should be performed to determine the cause of these findings and determine techniques to minimize phantosmia during radiation therapy.

Consensus Recommendations for Managing Childhood Cancer Survivors at Risk for Stroke After Cranial Irradiation: A Delphi Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is insufficient evidence to support stroke prevention guidelines for childhood cancer survivors (CCS) treated with cranial irradiation for central nervous system (CNS) tumors or other childhood cancers involving the CNS. We used a systematic consensus-building methodology to develop expert recommendations and define areas of controversy in managing asymptomatic CCS at risk for stroke.

METHODS

A Delphi process was used to query a multi-specialty panel of 45 physicians from US/Canada, with expertise in CCS, about their stroke screening and management practices (imaging, referrals, laboratory testing, and medications). Three iterative rounds of anonymous, scenario-based questionnaires, building on panelists' aggregate responses, were used to reach consensus (≥ 90% agreement), agreement (89-70% agree), or to understand rationale for disagreement (< 70% agree).

RESULTS

All 45 physicians participated in first two rounds and 44 in the third. Panelists reached consensus on indications for referral to neurology and laboratory screening for modifiable cerebral vascular disease (CVD) risk factors in most scenarios. Panelists agree that aspirin therapy is not recommended in the scenario of normal neuroimaging (86% agree). Decisions about aspirin therapy in scenarios with abnormal neuroimaging were deferred to specialists; almost all agree with not using aspirin for cavernomas with no evidence for prior hemorrhage (93%) and using aspirin for both large vessel CVD (93%) and small vessel CVD with evidence of prior stroke (86%). Clinical decisions that remain controversial (less than 70% agreement) include neuroimaging to screen asymptomatic CCS for CVD, referral to neurology for cavernomas, aspirin use in the setting of cavernomas with prior hemorrhage or with evidence for small vessel CVD and no prior stroke, and indications for statins. Overall, pediatric neurologists/neuro-oncologists and radiation oncologists were more likely to advocate for screening and interventions.

DISCUSSION

Despite lack of evidence to guide management of CCS at risk for stroke, expert recommendations and rationale developed by consensus-methodology are helpful to support clinical decision making.

RONC-14. Olfactory Perception During Proton Radiation and Differences in Frequency of Olfactory Perceptions Based on Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Technique for Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients

BACKGROUND: Unusual olfactory perception has been reported during brain radiation treatments but is infrequent and does not typically interfere with the ability to deliver treatment or cause notable distress. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 127 pediatric patients treated with proton radiation therapy (PRT) for primary brain tumors in a single institution between 2016-2021. Patients received PRT to the brain as part of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) followed by a boost to the brain. Proton CSI was delivered with 3D-CRT protons (n=53) or pencil beam scanning technique (PBS) (n=74). Within the PBS group, treatment delivery to the CSI utilized a single PA field (n=24) or two posterior oblique fields (n=50). We collected data on abnormal olfactory sensations, nausea/vomiting, and the use of medical intervention for those symptoms. Results: Our cohort included 80 males and 47 females. The median age of patients was 10 years old (range, 3 – 21). Seventy-one patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Prior to PRT, 31 patients were nauseous. During the radiation course, 104 patients developed worsening nausea while 63 patients reported emesis. Four patients vomited while receiving radiation. Seventeen patients reported olfactory perceptions during CSI. We found a higher rate of olfactory perception in patients treated with PBS (n=16, 22%) than 3D-CRT (n=1, 2%) (p=0.001) and, within the PBS group, patients treated with a single PA field (n=11, 46%) than two oblique fields (n=5, 10%) (p=0.002). Seventy-eight patients required intervention including addition of anti-emetic or anti-anxiety medication. Two patients required sedation due to the malodorous smell during CSI. We did not find any significant difference in nausea/vomiting based on treatment technique. Conclusions: PBS and PBS technique influence olfactory perceptions but not the occurrence of the rate of nausea/vomiting. Further studies should be performed to validate these findings and determine techniques to minimize unpleasant olfactory perceptions.

RADT-34. OLFACTORY PERCEPTION DURING PROTON RADIATION AND DIFFERENCES IN FREQUENCY OF OLFACTORY PERCEPTIONS BASED ON PROTON CRANIOSPINAL IRRADIATION TECHNIQUE FOR PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

Unusual olfactory perception has been reported during brain radiation treatments but is infrequent and does not typically interfere with the ability to deliver treatment or cause notable distress.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 127 pediatric patients treated with proton radiation therapy (PRT) for primary brain tumors in a single institution between 2016-2021. Patients received PRT to the brain as part of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) followed by a boost to the brain. Proton CSI was delivered with 3D-CRT protons (n=53) or pencil beam scanning technique (PBS) (n=74). Within the PBS group, treatment delivery to the CSI utilized a single PA field (n=24) or two posterior oblique fields (n=50). We collected data on abnormal olfactory sensations, nausea/vomiting, and the use of medical intervention for those symptoms.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 80 males and 47 females. The median age of patients was 10 years old (range, 3 – 21). Seventy-one patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Prior to PRT, 31 patients were nauseous. During the radiation course, 104 patients developed worsening nausea while 63 patients reported episodes of emesis. Four patients vomited while receiving radiation. Seventeen patients reported olfactory perceptions during CSI. We found a higher rate of olfactory perception in patients treated with PBS (n=16, 22%) than 3D-CRT (n=1, 2%) (p=0.001) and, within the PBS group, patients treated with a single PA field (n=11, 46%) than two oblique fields (n=5, 10%) (p=0.002). Seventy-eight patients required intervention including addition of anti-emetic or anti-anxiety medication. Two patients required sedation due to the malodorous smell during CSI. We did not find any significant difference in nausea/vomiting based on treatment technique.

CONCLUSIONS

PBS and PBS technique influence olfactory perceptions but not the occurrence of the rate of nausea/vomiting. Further studies should be performed to validate these findings and determine techniques to minimize unpleasant olfactory perceptions.

RONC-24. PROTON THERAPY FOR PEDIATRIC EPENDYMOMA: MATURE OUTCOMES FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL

OBJECTIVE

Report long-term efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy for pediatric ependymoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000–2017, 318 children with nonmetastatic grade II/III intracranial ependymoma received proton therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Florida. Median age was 3.5 years (range, 0.7–21.3 years); 56% were male. Most (69%) tumors were in the posterior fossa and classified as WHO grade III (64%). Eighty-four percent had a gross total or near total tumor resection before radiotherapy and 30% received chemotherapy. Median radiation dose was 55.8 CGE (range, 50.4–59.4 CGE).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6 years (range, 0.6–19.2 years). Seven-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 77.1% (95% CI 71.7–81.7%), 64.4% (95% CI 58.6–69.8%), and 82% (76.9–86.2%), respectively. Subtotal resection was associated with inferior local control (60% vs 80%; p<0.01), progression-free survival (49% vs 67%; p<0.01), and overall survival (69% vs 84%; p<0.05). Male gender was associated with inferior progression-free (59% vs 71%; p<0.01) and overall survival (77% vs 89%; p<0.05). Twenty patients (6.2%) require hearing aids; of these, 12/20 received cisplatin. Grade 3+ brainstem toxicity rate was 1.6% and more common in patients who received >54 CGE. The rate of second malignancy was 0.9%.

CONCLUSION

Proton therapy offers commensurate disease control to modern photon therapy without unexpected toxicity. The high rate of long-term survival justifies efforts to reduce radiation exposure in this young population with brain tumors. Independent of modality, this large series confirms extent of resection as the most important modifiable factor for survival.

Patient Prioritization for Proton Beam Therapy in a Cost-neutral Payer Environment: Use of the Clinical Benefit Score for Resource Allocation

Objectives There has been a rapid increase in the number of one- and two-room proton beam therapy (PBT) centers, which may be limited in the number of patients they can treat. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the 'clinical benefit score' (CBS), utilized as a method for treatment prioritization for PBT operating in a 'cost-neutral' proton-photon payer environment. Materials & methods This study includes patients considered for PBT at a center that initially had only one or two treatment rooms available for clinical use. Patients were prospectively scored using the CBS, and higher scores were prioritized. The outcome was receipt of PBT and the independent variable was CBS. Crude and adjusted analyses were performed using logistic regression. Results There were 2163 patients evaluated. A total of 205 patients (9.5%) were deemed candidates for PBT, which was received by 122 (5.6%) patients. In patients considered for PBT, the mean CBS was 18.7. Patients who were <21 years old, female, non-Caucasian, receiving re-irradiation, and those with Medicare had a higher CBS. Multivariate analysis adjusting for insurance status revealed both CBS and insurance to be significant predictors for receiving PBT. A unit increase in CBS was associated with 1.04 times increased odds of receiving PBT (OR=1.04, 95%CI: 1.01-1.07, p=0.0145) and having Medicare was associated with 3.13 times increased odds of receiving PBT (OR=3.13, 95%CI: 1.57-6.26, p=0.0012). Subgroup analysis, which only included patients enrolled prior to opening the second gantry, showed 1.05 times increased odds of receiving PBT per unit increase in CBS (OR=1.05, 95%CI: 1.00-1.10, p=0.03) and 2.87 times increased odds of receiving PBT in patients with Medicare (OR=2.87, 95%CI: 1.04-7.92, p=0.04). Conclusion  The CBS utilized was significantly associated with the receipt of PBT in a cost-neutral payer setting. Physicians may consider the use of CBS as a resource allocation tool.

National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury

PURPOSE

Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016.

RESULTS

The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning.

CONCLUSIONS

Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.

Assessing the radiation-induced second cancer risk in proton therapy for pediatric brain tumors: the impact of employing a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning

The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation-induced second cancer risks for in-field and out-of-field organs and tissues for pencil beam scanning (PBS) and passive scattering proton therapy (PPT) and assess the impact of adding patient-specific apertures to sharpen the penumbra in pencil beam scanning for pediatric brain tumor patients. Five proton therapy plans were created for each of three pediatric patients using PPT as well as PBS with two spot sizes (average sigma of ~17 mm and ~8 mm at isocenter) and choice of patient-specific apertures. The lifetime attributable second malignancy risks for both in-field and out-of-field tissues and organs were compared among five delivery techniques. The risk for in-field tissues was calculated using the organ equivalent dose, which is determined by the dose volume histogram. For out-of-field organs, the organ-specific dose equivalent from secondary neutrons was calculated using Monte Carlo and anthropomorphic pediatric phantoms. We find that either for small spot size PBS or for large spot size PBS, a patient-specific aperture reduces the in-field cancer risk to values lower than that for PPT. The reduction for large spot sizes (on average 43%) is larger than for small spot sizes (on average 21%). For out-of-field organs, the risk varies only marginally by employing a patient-specific aperture (on average from  -2% to 16% with increasing distance from the tumor), but is still one to two orders of magnitude lower than that for PPT. In conclusion, when pencil beam spot sizes are large, the addition of apertures to sharpen the penumbra decreases the in-field radiation-induced secondary cancer risk. There is a slight increase in out-of-field cancer risk as a result of neutron scatter from the aperture, but this risk is by far outweighed by the in-field risk benefit from using an aperture with a large PBS spot size. In general, the risk for developing a second malignancy in out-of-field organs for PBS remains much lower compared to PPT even if apertures are being applied.

Health-Related Quality of Life of Adolescent and Young Adult Survivors of Central Nervous System Tumors

This article uses qualitative methods to describe the domains of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) that adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors identify as important. Survivors clearly attributed aspects of their current HRQoL to their disease or its treatment. We identified 7 key domains of AYA CNS tumor survivorship: physical health, social well-being, mental health, cognitive functioning, health behaviors, sexual and reproductive health, and support systems. Although most aspects of HRQoL that survivors discussed represented new challenges, there were several areas where survivors pointed out positive outcomes. There is a need for a HRQoL tool designed for this population of survivors, given their unique treatment and survivorship experience. Aspects of HRQoL related to cognition, sexual and reproductive health, health behaviors, and support systems are not typically included in generic HRQoL tools but should be assessed for this population. Developing HRQoL measurement instruments that capture the most significant aspects of HRQoL will improve the ability to track HRQoL in AYA CNS tumor survivors and in the long-term management of common sequelae from CNS tumors and their treatments.

Cost effectiveness of proton therapy compared with photon therapy in the management of pediatric medulloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Proton therapy has been a hotly contested issue in both scientific publications and lay media. Proponents cite the modality's ability to spare healthy tissue, but critics claim the benefit gained from its use does not validate its cost compared with photon therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of proton therapy versus photon therapy in the management of pediatric medulloblastoma.

METHODS

A cost-effective analysis was performed from the societal perspective using a Monte Carlo simulation model. A population of pediatric medulloblastoma survivors aged 18 years was studied who had received treatment at age 5 years and who were at risk of developing 10 adverse events, such as growth hormone deficiency, coronary artery disease, ototoxicity, secondary malignant neoplasm, and death. Costing data included the cost of investment and the costs of diagnosis and management of adverse health states from institutional and Medicare data. Longitudinal outcomes data and recent modeling studies informed risk parameters for the model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to measure outcomes.

RESULTS

Results from the base case demonstrated that proton therapy was associated with higher quality-adjusted life years and lower costs; therefore, it dominated photon therapy. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, proton therapy remained the more attractive strategy, either dominating photon therapy or having a very low cost per quality-adjust life year gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis illustrated the domination of proton therapy over photon therapy in 96.4% of simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

By using current risk estimates and data on required capital investments, the current study indicated that proton therapy is a cost-effective strategy for the management of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma compared with standard of care photon therapy.

Relapse after treatment of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: outcome and role of surveillance after end of therapy

BACKGROUND

The outcome of treatment for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is excellent using chemotherapy and radiation. However, a minority of patients will relapse after treatment, but additional therapy achieves durable second remission in many cases. The optimal surveillance strategy after modern therapy for HL has not been well defined.

PROCEDURES

We reviewed the outcomes of pediatric patients with HL treated between 1990 and 2006 to determine the primary event that led to the detection of relapse. We determined the probability of relapse detection by routine follow-up procedures, including history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging, and determined the impact of each of these screening methods on the likelihood of survival after relapse.

RESULTS

Relapse occurred in 64 of 402 evaluable patients (15.9%) at a median of 1.7 years from the time of diagnosis. The majority of relapses (60%) were diagnosed at a routine visit, and patient complaint was the most common initial finding that led to a diagnosis of relapse (47% of relapses). An abnormal finding on physical examination was the primary event in another 17% of relapses, and imaging abnormalities led to the diagnosis in the remaining 36%. Laboratory abnormalities were never the primary finding. The method of detection of relapse and timing (whether detected at a routine visit or an extra visit) did not impact survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric HL, most relapses are identified through history and physical examination. Frequent imaging of asymptomatic patients does not appear to impact survival and is probably not warranted.

High-risk medulloblastoma: a pediatric oncology group randomized trial of chemotherapy before or after radiation therapy (POG 9031)

PURPOSE

To compare event-free survival (EFS) in children with high-risk medulloblastoma randomly assigned to receive either chemotherapy before radiation or chemotherapy after radiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned to each arm. Criteria used to categorize patients as high risk included M1-4 disease by modified Chang staging classification, T3b/T4 disease, or greater than 1.5 cm3 of residual tumor after surgery. Postoperatively, children with high-risk medulloblastoma were randomly assigned to two arms, either chemotherapy entailing three cycles of cisplatin and etoposide before radiation (chemotherapy first [CT1]) or the same chemotherapy regimen after radiation (radiation therapy first [RT1]). Both groups received consolidation chemotherapy consisting of vincristine and cyclophosphamide.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 6.4 years. Five-year EFS was 66.0% in the CT1 arm and 70.0% in the RT1 arm (P = .54), and 5-year overall survival in the two groups was 73.1% and 76.1%, respectively (P = .47). In the CT1 arm, 40 of the 62 patients with residual disease achieved either complete or partial remission.

CONCLUSION

Five-year EFS did not differ significantly whether, after surgery, patients received chemotherapy before or after radiotherapy.

Radiation recall myositis in pediatric Ewing sarcoma

Radiation recall is a rare and poorly understood phenomenon, characterized by an acute inflammatory reaction within the previously irradiated area, triggered by a precipitating systemic agent. This reaction typically affects the skin, and radiation recall myositis in the absence of cutaneous involvement has rarely been described in the literature. In this report, we present two cases of radiation recall in pediatric Ewing sarcoma patients receiving successive proton radiotherapy and chemotherapy, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of muscle edema within the prior radiation fields.

SU-E-T-258: Assessment of Radiation Induced Second Cancer Risks in Proton Therapy and IMRT for Organs inside the Main Radiation Field

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy can potentially cause a second malignancy. There is clinical evidence that those occur typically within the beam path in the medium/high dose region. The purpose of this study was to assess the risk for developing a radiation induced tumor within the treated volume and to compare this risk for proton therapy and IMRT.

METHODS

Fully contoured age and gender specific whole body phantoms (4-year and 14-year old) were uploaded into a treatment planning system and typical tumor volumes were contoured based on patients treated for optic glioma and vertebral body Ewing's sarcoma. Lifetime attributable risks (LARs) for developing a second malignancy were calculated using a risk model incorporating factors for cell kill, mutations, repopulation, and inhomogeneous organ doses.

RESULTS

For standard fractionation schemes, the LAR for developing a second malignancy from radiation therapy alone were found to be up to 2.7% for a 4-year old optic glioma patient treated with IMRT considering a soft tissue carcinoma risk model only. Sarcoma risks were found to be below 1% in all cases. For the 14-year old, risks were found to be about a factor of 2 lower. For the Ewing's sarcoma cases the risks based on the sarcoma model were typically higher than the carcinoma risks, i.e. up to 1.3% LAR for soft tissue sarcoma. Generally, the risk from proton therapy turned out to be lower by a factor of 2 to 10. However, comparison of a 3-field and 4-field proton plan shows that the distribution of the dose, i.e., the particular treatment plan, plays a role as well.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, proton therapy can significantly reduce the risk for developing an in-field second malignancy. Risk analysis based on our formalism could be applied within treatment planning programs to guide treatment plans for pediatric patients. Federal Share of program income earned by Massachusetts General Hospital on NIH/NCI C06 CA059267.

Proton-based radiotherapy for unresectable or incompletely resected osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to assess clinical outcome and the role of proton therapy for local control of osteosarcoma (OSA).

METHODS

All patients who received proton therapy or mixed photon-proton radiotherapy from 1983 to 2009 at the Massachusetts General Hospital were reviewed. Criteria for proton therapy were the need for high dose in the context of highly conformal radiotherapy of unresected or partially resected OSA, positive postoperative margins, postoperative imaging studies with macroscopic disease, or incomplete resection as defined by the surgeon. The primary endpoint was local control of the site treated; secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), long-term toxicity, and prognostic factors associated with clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with a median age of 29 years (range, 2-76 years) were offered proton therapy. The mean dose was 68.4 gray (Gy; standard deviation, 5.4 Gy). Of the total dose, 58.2% (range, 11%-100%) was delivered with protons. Local control after 3 and 5 years was 82% and 72%, respectively. The distant failure rate was 26% after 3 and 5 years. The 5-year DFS was 65%, and the 5-year OS was 67%. The extent of surgical resection did not correlate with outcome. Risk factors for local failure were ≥ 2 grade disease (P < .0001) and total treatment length (P = .008). Grade 3 to 4 late toxicity was seen in 30.1 % of patients. One patient died from treatment-associated acute lymphocytic leukemia, and 1 from secondary carcinoma of the maxilla.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton therapy to deliver high radiotherapy doses allows locally curative treatment for some patients with unresectable or incompletely resected OSA.

Orbital sarcoma with metastases at diagnosis: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group

We reviewed clinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes in seven patients diagnosed with Stage 4/Group IV orbital sarcoma and treated on IRSG protocols I-III. Three patients had embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), and two patients each had alveolar RMS or unclassified sarcoma. Median age at diagnosis was 1.8 years (range 0.2-6.9 years). All patients had bone marrow involvement, including six with normal complete blood count at diagnosis. Cerebrospinal fluid was normal in six patients. Three patients survived >5 years, including one with local recurrence. In conclusion, further study is needed to determine necessity of bone marrow and CSF examination in orbital sarcoma patients.

Proton radiotherapy for childhood ependymoma: initial clinical outcomes and dose comparisons

PURPOSE

To report preliminary clinical outcomes for pediatric patients treated with proton beam radiation for intracranial ependymoma and compare the dose distributions of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with photons (IMRT), three-dimensional conformal proton radiation, and intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT) for representative patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All children with intracranial ependymoma confined to the supratentorial or infratentorial brain treated at the Francis H. Burr Proton Facility and Harvard Cyclotron between November 2000 and March 2006 were included in this study. Seventeen patients were treated with protons. Proton, IMRT, and IMPT plans were generated with similar clinical constraints for representative infratentorial and supratentorial ependymoma cases. Tumor and normal tissue dose-volume histograms were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 26 months from the start date of radiation therapy, local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 86%, 80%, and 89%, respectively. Subtotal resection was significantly associated with decreased local control (p = 0.016). Similar tumor volume coverage was achieved with IMPT, proton therapy, and IMRT. Substantial normal tissue sparing was seen with proton therapy compared with IMRT. Use of IMPT will allow for additional sparing of some critical structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary disease control with proton therapy compares favorably with the literature. Dosimetric comparisons show the advantage of proton radiation compared with IMRT in the treatment of ependymoma. Further sparing of normal structures appears possible with IMPT. Superior dose distributions were accomplished with fewer beam angles with the use of protons and IMPT.

Sellar abnormalities in female first-degree relatives

Non-pituitary lesions account for a minority of sellar region abnormalities. We report the unusual occurrence of non-pituitary sellar/suprasellar lesions in a mother and her two daughters. Each of these cases was diagnosed and managed differently, illustrating the relative importance of radiographic imaging, tumor markers and histopathologic examination in the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial disease. The mother had histologically confirmed Rathke's cleft cyst (RCC) with typical radiographic and histologic appearance. One daughter was treated presumptively for germinoma based on characteristic radiographic studies and slightly elevated tumor marker. The other daughter's lesion exhibited radiographic characteristics concerning for pituitary macroadenoma but with slightly elevated germ cell tumor marker, raising the suspicion for germinoma. Biopsy of the intrasellar mass revealed only proteinaceous material and normal anterior pituitary, consistent with cyst content without evidence of neoplasm. Without a clear unifying diagnosis it is difficult to posit an underlying pathology or genetic mechanisms in this unusual set of cases. At least two of the patients had benign cysts. The diagnosis of the third patient is unclear as there was no tissue biopsy. However, it is highly improbable that three female first-degree relatives would develop such lesions in the same brain region simply by chance.

Phase II cisplatin, irinotecan, cetuximab and concurrent radiation therapy followed by surgery for locally advanced esophageal cancer

4064

Background: Weekly irinotecan, cisplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy is a well-tolerated, active regimen in locally advanced esophageal cancer. (Ilson. JCO 2003) Cetuximab, an EGFR inhibitor, is a potent radiation sensitizer in head and neck cancer. (Bonner. Proc ASCO 2004) Methods: In this phase II trial, patients (pts) with T2–4N0–1M0–1A esophageal adenocarcinoma (A) or squamous cell carcinoma (S) receive 5040 cGy/28 fractions of radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30mg/m2 plus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 on weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5, followed by surgery 4–8 weeks after completion of RT. Additionally, pts receive weekly infusions of cetuximab 250 mg during RT, up to one week before surgery, and for 6 months following surgery. Results: Seventeen pts have been entered: male: female = 14:3, median age 54, ECOG PS 0:1 = 6:11, A:S = 17:0, stage IIA:IIB:III:IVA = 6:1:8:2, tumor location-esophagus-mid:lower:gastroesophageal junction = 1:4:12, >10% weight loss-yes:no = 8:9. Of 17 pts entered, 15 pts have proceeded to surgery, 1 pt died from Aspergillus infection resulting in respiratory failure and sepsis, and 1 pt is pending surgery. Of the 15 pts who underwent surgery, 2 (13%) had a complete pathologic response; pathologic stage for other pts: 0 = 1, I = 3, IIA = 3, IIB = 1, III = 4, IV = 1. Grade III/IV toxicity (17 pts) was: diarrhea 9 pts, neutropenia 9 pts, febrile neutropenia 5 pts, anorexia 5 pts, vomiting 4 pts, fatigue 3 pts, mucositis 1 pt. Chemotherapy dose attenuation was required for diarrhea in 5 pts, for neutropenia in 4 pts, and for folliculitis in 1 pt. One patient was removed from study during week 6 for prolonged diarrhea/ dehydration. Due to the 2-step design of the trial, accrual is on hold pending a 3rd required pathologic CR in the first 17 patients. Conclusions: Compared to other trials of irinotecan, cisplatin, radiation therapy, and surgery in similar groups of esophageal cancer patients, early results for this combination with cetuximab suggest a lower complete response rate and higher overall toxicity. Additional data will be available at ASCO. Supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Proton radiotherapy for orbital rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical outcome and a dosimetric comparison with photons

BACKGROUND

Over 85% of pediatric orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are cured with combined chemotherapy and radiation. However, the late effects of photon radiation compromise function and cosmetic outcome. Proton radiation can provide excellent tumor dose distributions while sparing normal tissues better than photon irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Conformal 3D photon and proton radiotherapy plans were generated for children treated with proton irradiation for orbital RMS at Massachusetts General Hospital. Dose-volume histograms (90%, 50%, 10%) were generated and compared for important orbital and central nervous system structures. Average percentages of total dose prescribed were calculated based on the 3 dose-volume histogram levels for normal orbital structures for both the proton and photon plans. The percent of normal tissue spared by using protons was calculated.

RESULTS

Seven children were treated for orbital rhabdomyosarcoma with proton irradiation and standard chemotherapy. The median follow-up is 6.3 years (range, 3.5-9.7 years). Local and distant controls compare favorably to those in other published accounts. There was an advantage in limiting the dose to the brain, pituitary, hypothalamus, temporal lobes, and ipsilateral and contralateral orbital structures. Tumor size and location affect the degree of sparing of normal structures.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated proton radiotherapy is superior to 3D conformal photon radiation in the treatment of orbital RMS. Proton therapy maintains excellent tumor coverage while reducing the radiation dose to adjacent normal structures. Proton radiation therapy minimizes long-term side effects.