Long-term outcomes of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1 + P) and docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP) for HER2-positive primary breast cancer: results of the randomized phase 2 JBCRG20 study (Neo-peaks)

PURPOSE

The randomized phase 2 Neo-peaks study examined usefulness of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1 + P) following docetaxel + carboplatin + trastuzumab + pertuzumab (TCbHP) as compared with the standard TCbHP regimen. We previously reported that pCR rate after neoadjuvant therapy tended to be higher with TCbHP followed by T-DM1 + P. We conducted an exploratory analysis of prognosis 5 years after surgery.

METHODS

Neoadjuvant treatment with TCbHP (6 cycles; group A), TCbHP (4 cycles) followed by T-DM1 + P (4 cycles; group B), and T-DM1 + P (4 cycles; group C, + 2 cycles in responders) were compared. Group C non-responders after 4 cycles were switched to an anthracycline-based regimen. We evaluated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Data from 203 patients (50, 52, and 101 in groups A-C, respectively) were analyzed. No significant intergroup differences were found for DFS, DDFS, or OS. The 5-year DFS rates (95% CI) were 91.8% (79.6-96.8%), 92.3% (80.8-97.0%), and 88.0% (79.9-93.0%) in groups A-C, respectively. TCbHP followed by T-DM1 + P and T-DM1 + P with response-guided addition of anthracycline therapy resulted in similar long-term prognosis to that of TCbHP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who achieved pCR after neoadjuvant therapy with T-DM1 + P, omission of adjuvant anthracycline may be considered, whereas treatment should be adjusted for non-pCR patients with residual disease. T-DM1 + P with response-guided treatment adjustment may be useful for minimizing toxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE OF REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR, UMIN000014649, prospectively registered July 25, 2014. Some of the study results were presented as a Mini Oral session at the ESMO Breast Cancer 2023 (Berlin, Germany, 11-13 May 2023).

Effectiveness and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen for acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remain poor. Although the concomitant use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and anti-chemotherapeutic agents has been investigated to improve the antileukemic effect on AML, its usefulness remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of G-CSF priming as a remission induction therapy or salvage chemotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a thorough literature search for studies related to the priming effect of G-CSF using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and risk ratios (RRs) with confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and summarized.

RESULTS

Two reviewers independently extracted and accessed the 278 records identified during the initial screening, and 62 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility in second screening. Eleven studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 10 in the meta-analysis. A systematic review revealed that priming with G-CSF did not correlate with an improvement in response rate and overall survival (OS). The result of the meta-analysis revealed the tendency for lower relapse rate in the G-CSF priming groups without inter-study heterogeneity [RR, 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.01), p = 0.08; I2 = 4%, p = 0.35]. In specific populations, including patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk and those receiving high-dose cytarabine, the G-CSF priming regimen prolonged OS.

CONCLUSIONS

G-CSF priming in combination with intensive remission induction treatment is not universally effective in patients with AML. Further studies are required to identify the patient cohort for which G-CSF priming is recommended.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In DESTINY-Breast02, patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab deruxtecan demonstrated superior progression-free and overall survival compared with those receiving treatment of physician's choice. We present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and hospitalisation data.

METHODS

In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 227 clinical sites globally, enrolled patients had to be aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on trastuzumab emtansine and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using block randomisation (block size of 3) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg intravenously once every 21 days) or treatment of physician's choice by an independent biostatistician using an interactive web-based system. Patients and investigators remained unmasked to treatment. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint, which was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review, has previously been reported. PROs were assessed in the full analysis set (all patients randomly assigned to the study) using the oncology-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), breast cancer-specific EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast 45 (QLQ-BR45), and the generic HRQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Analyses included change from baseline and time to definitive deterioration for PRO variables of interest and hospitalisation-related endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585, and is closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive either trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). Overall, 603 patients (99%) were female and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (IQR 8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median treatment duration was 11·3 months (IQR 6·2-20·5) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and approximately 4·5 months in the treatment of physician's choice group (4·4 months [IQR 2·5-8·7] with trastuzumab; 4·6 months [2·1-8·9] with capecitabine; and 4·5 months [2·1-10·6] with lapatinib). Baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) scores were similar with trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=393) and treatment of physician's choice (n=187), and remained stable with no clinically meaningful change (defined as ≥10-point change from baseline) over time. Median time to definitive deterioration was delayed with trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with treatment of physician's choice for the primary PRO variable EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS (14·1 months [95% CI 10·4-18·7] vs 5·9 months [4·3-7·9]; HR 0·5573 [0·4376-0·7099], p<0·0001) and all other prespecified PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, EORTC QLQ-BR45 arm and breast symptoms, and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale). Patient hospitalisation rates were similar in the trastuzumab deruxtecan (92 [23%] of 406) and treatment of physician's choice (41 [20%] of 202) groups; however, median time to hospitalisation was 133 days (IQR 56-237) with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 83 days (30-152) with treatment of physician's choice.

INTERPRETATION

Overall, GHS and quality of life were maintained for both treatment groups, with prespecified PRO variables favouring trastuzumab deruxtecan over treatment of physician's choice, suggesting that despite a longer treatment duration, there was no detrimental impact on patient health-related quality of life with trastuzumab deruxtecan. When considered with efficacy and safety data from DESTINY-Breast02, these results support the overall benefit of trastuzumab deruxtecan for patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel (DTX) is commonly used as a primary chemotherapy, and cabazitaxel (CBZ) has shown efficacy in patients who are DTX resistant. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is currently used with CBZ treatment in routine clinical care in Japan.

METHODS

In this study, we performed a systematic review following the Minds guidelines to investigate the effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer and to construct G-CSF guidelines for primary prophylaxis use during chemotherapy. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi) was performed on January 10, 2020, to identify studies published between January 1990 and December 31, 2019 that investigate the impact of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during CBZ administration on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Ultimately, nine articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was difficult to assess in terms of correlation with overall survival, mortality from infection, and patients' quality of life. These difficulties were owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing patients with and without primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during CBZ administration. However, some retrospective studies have suggested that it may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

G-CSF may be beneficial as primary prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) decreases the incidence, duration, and severity of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, dose reduction or withdrawal is often preferred in the management of adverse events in the treatment of urothelial cancer. It is also important to maintain therapeutic intensity in order to control disease progression and thereby relieve symptoms, such as hematuria, infection, bleeding, and pain, as well as to prolong the survival. In this clinical question, we compared treatment with primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF to maintain therapeutic intensity with conventional standard therapy without G-CSF and examined the benefits and risks as major outcomes. A detailed literature search for relevant studies was performed using PubMed, Ichu-shi Web, and Cochrane Library. Data were extracted and evaluated independently by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of the pooled data was performed, and the risk ratios with corresponding confidence intervals were calculated and summarized in a meta-analysis. Seven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, two of which were reviewed in the meta-analysis of dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) therapy, and one randomized controlled study showed a reduction in the incidence of FN. Primary prophylactic administration of G-CSF may be beneficial, as shown in a randomized controlled study of dose-dense MVAC therapy. However, there are no studies on other regimens, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen (dose-dense MVAC).

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low advanced or metastatic breast cancer: recommendations from the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines are published as timely guidance on clinical issues in breast cancer treatment in Japan. In the recent edition of these guidelines, we addressed a new clinical question 34 (CQ 34, systemic treatment part) "Is trastuzumab deruxtecan recommended for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer?" and a new future research question 7 (FRQ 7, pathological diagnosis part) "How is HER2-low breast cancer diagnosed for the indication of trastuzumab deruxtecan?". These questions address use of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The strengths of evidence and recommendation were determined through a quantitative and qualitative systematic review using multiple outcomes, including efficacy and safety. We conclude that trastuzumab deruxtecan is recommended for this patient population (strength of recommendation: 1; strength of evidence: moderate; CQ34) and that HER2-low expression for the indication of trastuzumab deruxtecan should be diagnosed using companion diagnostics based on appropriate criteria (FRQ7).

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology

Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence, duration, and severity of neutropenia, its prophylactic use for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to a theoretically increased risk of relapse. The present study investigated the effects of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for AML with remission induction therapy. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of pooled data was conducted, and the risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated in the meta-analysis and summarized. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, nine of which were examined in the meta-analysis. Although G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not correlate with infection-related mortality. Moreover, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not affect disease progression/recurrence, overall survival, or adverse events, such as musculoskeletal pain. However, evidence to support or discourage the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for adult AML patients with induction therapy remains limited. Therefore, the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis can be considered for adult AML patients with remission induction therapy who are at a high risk of infectious complications.

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

INTRODUCTION

The timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration.

METHODS

Based on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data.

RESULTS

Among 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.

Comparison between a single dose of PEG G-CSF and multiple doses of non-PEG G-CSF: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

BACKGROUD

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia (FN). Two types of G-CSF are available in Japan, namely G-CSF chemically bound to polyethylene glycol (PEG G-CSF), which provides long-lasting effects with a single dose, and non-polyethylene glycol-bound G-CSF (non-PEG G-CSF), which must be sequentially administrated for several days.

METHODS

This current study investigated the utility of these treatments for the primary prophylaxis of FN through a systematic review of the literature. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis or meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate six outcomes.

RESULTS

Through the first and second screenings, 23 and 18 articles were extracted for qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, respectively. The incidence of FN was significantly lower in the PEG G-CSF group than in the non-PEG G-CSF group with a strong quality/certainty of evidence. The differences in other outcomes, such as overall survival, infection-related mortality, the duration of neutropenia (less than 500/μL), quality of life, and pain, were not apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of PEG G-CSF is strongly recommended over multiple-dose non-PEG G-CSF therapy for the primary prophylaxis of FN.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in OlympiA: A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Adjuvant Olaparib in gBRCA1/2 Mutations and High-Risk Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The OlympiA randomized phase III trial compared 1 year of olaparib (OL) or placebo (PL) as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2, high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early breast cancer after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), surgery, and radiotherapy. The patient-reported outcome primary hypothesis was that OL-treated patients may experience greater fatigue during treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected before random assignment, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary end point was fatigue, measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary end points, assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 item, included nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, and multiple functional domains. Scores were compared between treatment groups using mixed model for repeated measures. Two-sided P values <.05 were statistically significant for the primary end point. All secondary end points were descriptive.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred and thirty-eight patients (NACT: 746, ACT: 792) contributed to the analysis. Fatigue severity was statistically significantly greater for OL versus PL, but not clinically meaningfully different by prespecified criteria (≥3 points) at 6 months (diff OL v PL: NACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .022; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.3 to -0.2]; P = .017) and 12 months (NACT: -1.6 [95% CI, -2.8 to -0.3]; P = .017; ACT: -1.3 [95% CI, -2.4 to -0.2]; P = .025). There were no significant differences in fatigue severity between treatment groups at 18 and 24 months. NV severity was worse in patients treated with OL compared with PL at 6 months (NACT: 6.0 [95% CI, 4.1 to 8.0]; ACT: 5.3 [95% CI, 3.4 to 7.2]) and 12 months (NACT: 6.4 [95% CI, 4.4 to 8.3]; ACT: 4.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to 6.1]). During treatment, there were some clinically meaningful differences between groups for other symptoms but not for function subscales or global health status.

CONCLUSION

Treatment-emergent symptoms from OL were limited, generally resolving after treatment ended. OL- and PL-treated patients had similar functional scores, slowly improving during the 24 months after (N)ACT and there was no clinically meaningful persistence of fatigue severity in OL-treated patients.

Effectiveness of G-CSF in chemotherapy for digestive system tumors: a systematic review of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 delineated by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reportedly reduces the risk of neutropenia and subsequent infections caused by cancer chemotherapy. Although several guidelines recommend using G-CSF in primary prophylaxis according to the incidence rate of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN), the effectiveness of G-CSF in digestive system tumor chemotherapy remains unclear. To address these clinical questions, we conducted a systematic review as part of revising the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 published by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

METHODS

This systematic review addressed two main clinical questions (CQ): CQ1: "Is primary prophylaxis with G-CSF effective in chemotherapy?", and CQ2: "Is increasing the intensity of chemotherapy with G-CSF effective?" We reviewed different types of digestive system tumors, including esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary tract, colorectal, and neuroendocrine carcinomas. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched for information sources. Independent systematic reviewers conducted two rounds of screening and selected relevant records for each CQ. Finally, the working group members synthesized the strength of evidence and recommendations.

RESULTS

After two rounds of screening, 5/0/3/0/2/0 records were extracted for CQ1 of esophageal/gastric/pancreatic/biliary tract/colorectal/ and neuroendocrine carcinoma, respectively. Additionally, a total of 2/6/1 records were extracted for CQ2 of esophageal/pancreatic/colorectal cancer, respectively. The strength of evidence and recommendations were evaluated for CQ1 of colorectal cancer; however, we could not synthesize recommendations for other CQs owing to the lack of records.

CONCLUSION

The use of G-CSF for primary prophylaxis in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer is inappropriate.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy, especially when incidence rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) surpasses 20%. While primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has been proven effective in preventing FN in patients with cancer, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy in specifically, lung cancer. Our systematic review focused on the efficacy of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in lung cancer.

METHODS

We extracted studies on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using the PubMed, Ichushi Web, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers assessed the extracted studies for each type of lung cancer and conducted quantitative and meta-analyses of preplanned outcomes, including overall survival, FN incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain.

RESULTS

A limited number of studies were extracted: two on NSCLC and six on SCLC. A meta-analysis was not conducted owing to insufficient data on NSCLC. Two case-control studies explored the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with NSCLC (on docetaxel and ramucirumab therapy) and indicated a lower FN frequency with G-CSF. For SCLC, meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant reduction in FN incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.03-5.56, P = 0.48). Outcomes other than FN incidence could not be evaluated due to low data availability.

CONCLUSION

Limited data are available on G-CSF prophylaxis in lung cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may be weakly recommended in Japanese patients with NSCLC undergoing docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy.

Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients with Gastric and Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has displayed demonstrable efficacy and manageable toxicity in previously treated patients with advanced gastric and breast cancer, and it has been approved in Japan. However, there is a lack of data on the optimal management in clinical practice. Therefore, we assessed the adverse event (AE) profiles of T-DXd in patients with advanced gastric or breast cancer to provide guidance for appropriate management. This retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research. We reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced gastric or breast cancer who received T-DXd between May 2020 and December 2021. AEs occurring within the first three cycles of T-DXd were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Thirty-six patients were enrolled (gastric: n = 19, breast: n = 17). All 15 males had gastric cancer, whereas 4 and 17 females had gastric and breast cancer, respectively. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurred in five patients (14%), but no patients had severe ILD. Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, including nausea (61%), vomiting (22%), decreased appetite (33%), and diarrhea (39%), were the most common AEs. The incidence of GI toxicities did not differ by cancer type; however, nausea was significantly more common in females (81 vs. 33%; p < 0.01). T-DXd was safely administered in clinical practice in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or breast cancer. The management of GI toxicities is important in the clinical implementation of T-DXd.

Clinical and imaging features of interstitial lung disease in cancer patients treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (ILD/pneumonitis) has been identified as a drug-related adverse event of special interest of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), but there were a few reports of T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis in clinical practice.

METHODS

Between May 25, 2020 (the launch of T-DXd in Japan) and February 24, 2022, there were 287 physician-reported potential ILD/pneumonitis cases from the Japanese post-marketing all-case surveillance. By February 27, 2022, an independent adjudication committee assessed 138 cases and adjudicated 130 cases as T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis. The clinical features and imaging characteristics of these cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority of adjudicated T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis cases were grade 1 or 2 (100/130, 76.9%). The most common radiological pattern types observed were organizing pneumonia patterns (63.1%), hypersensitivity pneumonitis patterns (16.9%), and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) patterns (14.6%). Eleven cases (8.5%) from 130 resulted in death; the majority of these (8/11, 72.7%) had DAD patterns. The overall proportion of recovery (including the outcomes of recovered, recovered with sequelae, and recovering) was 76.9%, and the median time to recovery was 83.5 days (interquartile range: 42.25-143.75 days). Most cases (59/71, 83.1%) that were treated with corticosteroids were considered responsive to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to evaluate T-DXd-related ILD/pneumonitis cases in clinical practice. Our findings are consistent with previous reports and suggest that patients with DAD patterns have poor outcomes. Evaluation of a larger real-world dataset may further identify predictors of clinical outcome.

Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim biosimilar MD-110 in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: Single-arm phase III

INTRODUCTION

Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. It is the first granulocyte-colony stimulating factor approved for prophylactic use regardless of carcinoma type and is marketed in Japan as G-LASTA (Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). MD-110 is a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim. This phase III, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of MD-110 in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 101 patients received the study drug. Each patient received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (TC) for four cycles on day 1 of each cycle. MD-110 (3.6 mg) was administered subcutaneously on day 2 of each cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 (days with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm3 ). The safety endpoints were adverse events and the presence of antidrug antibodies.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) duration of severe neutropenia for MD-110 was 0.2 (0.4) days. The upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0.2 days, below the predefined threshold of 3.0 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, the secondary efficacy endpoint, was 6.9% (7/101). Adverse events, occurring in more than 50% of patients, were alopecia, constipation, and malaise, which are common side effects of TC chemotherapy. Antidrug antibodies were negative in all patients.

CONCLUSION

MD-110 was effective against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. No additional safety concern, compared with the originator, was observed in patients with breast cancer receiving TC chemotherapy.(JapicCTI-205230).

Primary ovarian insufficiency associated with lenvatinib therapy in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report

The therapeutic effects of molecular targeted drugs are, in some cases, more pronounced than those of conventional chemotherapy, and their introduction as a standard treatment is increasing. The present report describes a case of ovarian insufficiency in a young woman caused by tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib. The 25-year-old woman received lenvatinib (8 mg/day) for 98 days as preoperative chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Blood testing the day before starting lenvatinib administration indicated 4.40 mIU/ml luteinizing hormone (LH), 5.2 mIU/ml follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and age-equivalent hormone values. Amenorrhea occurred after the start of administration, and 48 days later, the LH level was 41.8 mIU/ml and the FSH level was 44 mIU/ml, indicating a decrease in ovarian function. The patient underwent hepatectomy, and 49 days after the end of lenvatinib administration, the LH level had improved to 4.5 mIU/ml and the FSH level had improved to 2.5 mIU/ml. After the hepatectomy, the patient began to have regular menstrual cycles once again. Ovarian toxicity has not been recognized as a side effect of lenvatinib. However, the present report describes primary ovarian insufficiency considered to be caused by this drug. Potential damage to ovarian function may need to be considered when molecular targeted drugs with the same mechanism of action as lenvatinib are used in young women.

Efficacy of probiotics and trimebutine maleate for abemaciclib-induced diarrhea: A randomized, open-label phase II trial (MERMAID, WJOG11318B)

BACKGROUND

Abemaciclib-induced diarrhea (AID) impairs quality of life (QOL) and treatment adherence in patients with breast cancer. Supportive treatment with loperamide is associated with constipation. We hypothesized that probiotics and trimebutine maleate (TM) would decrease the frequency of AID without causing constipation.

METHODS

Hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer patients were randomized into the probiotic Bifidobacterium (A) or probiotic Bifidobacterium and TM (B) groups. Endocrine therapy, Abemaciclib and probiotic Bifidobacterium three times a day for 28 days, was administered to both arms. Arm B was treated with TM upon the onset of diarrhea. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who experienced grade ≥2 diarrhea. The secondary endpoints were safety, frequency, and duration of all-grade diarrhea; frequency of emesis and constipation; usage of loperamide; and health-related QOL/patient-reported outcome during the study. We evaluated whether the primary endpoint of each arm exceeded the predetermined threshold.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients completed treatment. Grade 2 diarrhea occurred in 52% and 50% of patients in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea in each arm. The median duration of grade2 diarrhea was 2 and 2.5day, and only one patient required dose reduction. Grade ≥2 constipation was observed in 4% of Arm A and 3.6% of Arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotic Bifidobacterium or the combination of probiotic Bifidobacterium with TM did not decrease the incidence of grade 2 or greater diarrhea compared with historical control, although the grade 3 or greater diarrhea was reduced.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCT (Japan registry of clinical trials). jRCTs031190154.

Fulvestrant with or without anti-HER2 therapy in patients in a postmenopausal hormonal state and with ER-positive HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer: A subgroup analysis of data from the Safari study (JBCRG-C06)

BACKGROUND

The role of endocrine therapy in the treatment of patients in a postmenopausal hormonal state and with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) is unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from 94 patients with ER-positive HER2-positive AMBC enrolled in the Safari study (UMIN000015168), a retrospective cohort study of 1072 ER-positive AMBC patients in a postmenopausal hormonal state who received fulvestrant 500 mg (F500): (1) to compare time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) by treatment group, and TTF by treatment line; (2) in patients who received endocrine therapy (including F500) or anti-HER2 therapy as initial systemic therapy before chemotherapy, to investigate relations between TTF for the first-line therapy or time to chemotherapy (TTC) and OS; (3) to investigate factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

The TTF was longer in the patients treated with F500 as first- or second-line therapy (n = 20) than in those who received later-line F500 therapy (n = 74) (6.6 vs. 3.7 months; HR, 1.98; p = 0.014). In the 59 patients who received endocrine therapy or anti-HER2 therapy as initial systemic therapy before chemotherapy, those with TTC ≥3 years had longer median OS than those with TTC <3 years (10.5 vs. 5.9 years; HR, 0.32; p = 0.001). Longer TTC was associated with prolonged OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ER-positive HER2-positive AMBC enrolled in the Safari study, TTF was longer in patients who received F500 as first- or second-line therapy. In patients who received chemotherapy-free initial systemic therapy, the prolonged OS in those with TTC ≥3 years suggests that this value may be a helpful cut-off for indicating clinical outcomes.

Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of nivolumab in combination with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study (WJOG11418B NEWFLAME trial)

BACKGROUND

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer is a disease for which no immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise as effective therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors synergistically increased the effectiveness of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies in preclinical studies.

METHODS

This non-randomized, multicohort, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab 240 mg administered every 2 weeks in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily and either fulvestrant (FUL) or letrozole (LET) as a first-line or second-line treatment for HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Blood, tissue, and fecal samples were collected at multiple points for correlative studies to evaluate immunity biomarkers.

RESULTS

From June 2019 to early study termination due to safety concerns on July 2020, 17 patients were enrolled (FUL: n=12, LET: n=5). One patient with a prior treatment history in the FUL cohort was excluded. ORRs were 54.5% (6/11) and 40.0% (2/5) in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. Treatment-emergent (TE) adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in 11 (92%) and 5 (100%) patients in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutropenia (7 (58.3%) and 3 (60.0%) in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively), followed by alanine aminotransferase elevation (5 (41.6%) and 4 (80.0%)). One treatment-related death from interstitial lung disease occurred in the LET cohort. Ten patients developed liver-related grade ≥3 AEs. Liver biopsy specimens from 3 patients showed hepatitis characterized by focal necrosis with predominant CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration. Marked elevation of tumor necrosis factor-related cytokines and interleukin-11, and a decrease in peripheral regulatory T cells (Tregs), were observed in patients with hepatotoxicity. These findings suggest that treatment-related toxicities were immune-related AEs likely caused by proinflammatory cytokine production and suppression of Treg proliferation due to the addition of abemaciclib to nivolumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the combination of nivolumab and abemaciclib was active, it caused severe and prolonged immune-related AEs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

JapicCTI-194782, jRCT2080224706, UMIN000036970.

Influence of menopause on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in highly emetogenic chemotherapy for breast cancer: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Female sex and younger age are reported risk factors for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy, but the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to clarify the impact of menopause on CINV.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study analyzed data from consecutive patients who received their first cycle of perioperative anthracycline-based chemotherapy for breast cancer between January 2018 and June 2020. The endpoints were association between CINV (vomiting, ≥Grade 2 nausea, complete response [CR] failure) and menopause as well as the association between CINV and follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH]/estradiol [E2].

RESULTS

Data for 639 patients were analyzed. Among these patients, 109 (17.1%) received olanzapine (four antiemetic combinations) and 530 (82.9%) did not (three antiemetic combinations). Premenopausal state (amenorrhea lasting ≥12 months) was significantly associated with ≥Grade 2 nausea and CR failure in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. The premenopausal FSH/E2 group (defined by serum levels; FSH <40 mIU/mL and E2 ≥20 pg/mL) had a significantly higher rate of ≥Grade 2 nausea than the postmenopausal FSH/E2 group (FSH ≥40 mIU/mL and E2 <20 pg/mL) (48.8% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that changes in FSH and E2 due to menopause may affect the severity of nausea and that FSH and E2 (especially FSH) levels might be useful indicators for CINV risk assessment.

Mitigation of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients using limb-cooling apparatus: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common adverse events that can significantly impair the quality of life of patients. Although limb cooling may be beneficial for preventing CIPN, logistical challenges exist in ensuring consistent efficacy and safety. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to validate whether limb cooling with strict temperature control can reduce CIPN in patients with breast cancer receiving weekly paclitaxel as a perioperative treatment.

Methods

This study is a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. We plan to enroll patients with breast cancer who are scheduled to receive 12 weekly doses of paclitaxel (60 min 80 mg/m² intravenous infusion) as perioperative chemotherapy. Patients will be randomly divided into the intervention or control groups and undergo limb cooling therapy maintained at a constant temperature of 13°C and 25°C, respectively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who report Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) ≥ D in their limbs by the end of the study treatment or at the time of discontinuation.

Discussion

The results of this trial will contribute to the establishment of new evidence for limb cooling therapy in the mitigation of CIPN and present a safe and stable cooling device that may be suitable for use in the clinic.

Clinical trial registration

https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2032210115, identifier jRCT2032210115.

Adjuvant olaparib in the subset of patients from Japan with BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated high-risk early breast cancer from the phase 3 OlympiA trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of olaparib compared with placebo in the subset of patients from Japan in the phase 3 OlympiA trial (NCT02032823) are reported here and contextualized with reference to the global OlympiA population.

METHODS

Patients with germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 pathogenic variants and HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer who had received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy and completed local treatment were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive olaparib or placebo for 1 year.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Secondary endpoints: distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Data are reported from the first pre-specified interim analysis (data cut-off [DCO] March 27, 2020) and the second, event driven, pre-specified interim analysis of OS (DCO July 12, 2021) in patients from Japan.

RESULTS

140 patients were randomized in Japan (olaparib, n = 64; placebo, n = 76). At the first pre-specified interim analysis (median follow-up: 2.9 years), hazard ratios (HRs) for adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo were 0.5 for IDFS (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-1.24) and 0.41 for DDFS (95% CI 0.11-1.16). At the second pre-specified interim analysis of OS, three deaths occurred in the olaparib group versus six deaths in the placebo group (HR, 0.62 [95% CI 0.13-2.36]). Findings were consistent with those for the global population. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

While this analysis in a Japanese subset of patients was not powered to detect population-related treatment differences, efficacy and safety analysis results were consistent with the global OlympiA population, suggesting the findings from the global study are generalizable to clinical practice in Japan.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the single-arm, phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial, trastuzumab deruxtecan showed robust activity in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were refractory or resistant to trastuzumab emtansine; a population with scarce effective treatments. In DESTINY-Breast02, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan with treatment of physician's choice in this patient population.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial was conducted at 227 sites (hospitals, university hospitals, clinics, community centres, and private oncology centres) in North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Brazil, Israel, and Türkiye. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had unresectable or HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, previously received trastuzumab emtansine, disease progression, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate renal and hepatic function. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (intravenously at 5·4 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) or treatment of physician's choice using block randomisation. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2; orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review in the full analysis set. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). 608 (100%) patients were included in the full analysis set. The median age was 54·2 years (IQR 45·5-63·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 54·7 years (48·0-63·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. 384 (63%) patients were White, 603 (99%) were female, and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 17·8 months (95% CI 14·3-20·8) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group versus 6·9 months (5·5-8·4) in the treatment of physician's choice group (HR 0·36 [0·28-0·45]; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (293 [73%] of 404 with trastuzumab deruxtecan vs 73 [37%] of 195 with treatment of physician's choice), vomiting (152 [38%] vs 25 [13%]), alopecia (150 [37%] vs eight [4%]), fatigue (147 [36%] vs 52 [27%]), diarrhoea (109 [27%] vs 105 [54%]), and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (seven [2%] vs 100 [51%]). Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 213 (53%) patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 86 (44%) receiving treatment of physician's choice; whereas drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 42 (10%; including two grade 5 death events) versus one (<1%).

INTERPRETATION

DESTINY-Breast02 shows the favourable benefit-risk profile of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer, as previously reported in DESTINY-Breast01, and is the first randomised study to show that one antibody-drug conjugate can overcome resistance to a previous one.

FUNDING

Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of abemaciclib for the treatment of HR + , HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients in Japan

INTRODUCTION

This study described, in routine clinical practice in Japan, the patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of female patients with HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who started abemaciclib treatment.

METHODS

Clinical charts were reviewed for patients starting abemaciclib in 12/2018-08/2021 with a minimum of 3 months follow-up data post-abemaciclib initiation regardless of abemaciclib discontinuation. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and tumor response were descriptively summarized. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

200 patients from 14 institutions were included. At abemaciclib initiation, median age was 59 years, and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was 0/1/2 for 102/68/5 patients (58.3/38.9/2.9%), respectively. Most had an abemaciclib starting dose of 150 mg (92.5%). The percentage of patients receiving abemaciclib as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line treatment was 31.5%, 25.8%, and 25.2%, respectively. The most frequent endocrine therapy drugs used with abemaciclib were fulvestrant (59%) and aromatase inhibitors (40%). Evaluation of tumor response was available for 171 patients, 30.4% of whom had complete/partial response. Median PFS was 13.0 months (95% CI 10.1-15.8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

In a routine clinical practice setting in Japan, patients with HR + , HER2- MBC appear to benefit from abemaciclib treatment in terms of treatment response and median PFS, with the results broadly reflecting the evidence demonstrated in clinical trials.

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of prophylactic olanzapine for patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving T-DXd treatment: protocol for the ERICA study (WJOG14320B)

INTRODUCTION

The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has led to a change in the clinical management of breast cancer. Nausea and vomiting are the most common adverse events of T-DXd, which cannot be completely alleviated by standard prophylactic regimens. Olanzapine is particularly effective in preventing delayed nausea caused by chemotherapy. In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine in managing persistent nausea and vomiting during T-DXd treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ERICA study is a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase II study with the aim to evaluate the antiemetic effects of the prophylactic olanzapine (5 mg orally, on days 1-6) or placebo combined with a 1,5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT₃)-receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer undergoing T-DXd treatment. For a period of 22 days from the day of T-DXd treatment, patients will document their experience in an electronic symptom diary daily during observational periods. The primary endpoint is the complete response rate, defined as no vomiting and no rescue medications during the 'delayed phase' of 24-120 hours post-T-DXd administration. In addition, we define 120-504 hour as the 'persistent phase' and 0-504 hours as the 'overall phase' for secondary endpoint analysis. We have estimated that a total sample size of at least 156 patients is needed to allow a power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 20% in this study. The target sample size is set to 166 to account for possible case exclusions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol is approved by the West Japan Oncology Group protocol review committee and the SHOWA University Clinical Research Review Board. The study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs031210410.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients with triple-negative breast cancer: Results from KEYNOTE-355

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer with tumor programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10 in the global, phase 3, randomized controlled trial KEYNOTE-355. We report results for patients enrolled in Japan. Patients were randomized 2:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo Q3W for 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine-carboplatin). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST version 1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. No alpha was assigned to this exploratory analysis. Eighty-seven patients were randomized in Japan (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, n = 61; placebo plus chemotherapy, n = 26), 66 (76%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and 28 (32%) had PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Median time from randomization to data cutoff (June 15, 2021) was 44.7 (range, 37.2-52.9) months in the ITT population. Hazard ratios (HRs; 95% CI) for OS were 0.36 (0.14-0.89), 0.52 (0.30-0.91), and 0.46 (0.28-0.77) in the PD-L1 CPS ≥10, PD-L1 CPS ≥1, and ITT populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for PFS were 0.52 (0.20-1.34), 0.61 (0.35-1.06), and 0.64 (0.39-1.05). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 85% of patients in each group (no grade 5 events). Consistent with the global population, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy tended to show improvements in OS and PFS with manageable toxicity versus placebo plus chemotherapy in Japanese patients and supports this combination in this setting.

Retrospective study on the effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of ER-positive/HER2-negative post-menopausal advanced breast cancer: an additional analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study

BACKGROUND

Only old evidence exists to back up the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors that influence the time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate in real-world settings as late-line treatment.

METHODS

This was a cohort study that used the database of the Safari study on oestrogen receptor-positive post-menopausal advanced breast cancer (UMIN000015168). We created Kaplan-Meier curves for time to treatment failure with medroxyprogesterone acetate. Further, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox hazard model of the clinicopathological factors involved in the time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate.

RESULTS

From the 1031 patients in the Safari study, 279 patients were selected as the population for the analysis of effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate monotherapy. In the analysis of medroxyprogesterone acetate by treatment line, the median time to treatment failure was 3.0 months for third-line treatment and 4.1 months for fourth and subsequent treatment lines. In cases where medroxyprogesterone acetate was used as a third-line or later endocrine treatment, multivariate analysis showed that the length of the disease-free interval was correlated with the length of time to treatment failure of medroxyprogesterone acetate (P = 0.004). With medroxyprogesterone acetate monotherapy as the fourth-line or later treatment, 20% of the patients achieved a time to treatment failure of 12 months or longer.

CONCLUSION

In actual clinical practice, patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate alone as the fourth or subsequent treatment lines showed a time to treatment failure of 4 months, suggesting that there is merit in using medroxyprogesterone acetate even in late treatment lines, especially in patients with long disease-free interval and those who are difficult to treat using other antineoplastic agents.

Abstract P2-03-15: Retrospective study using database for the effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal advanced breast cancer: An additional analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study

Background: Only old evidence exist to back up the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in endocrine therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors that influence the time to treatment failure (TTF) of MPA in real world settings as late-line treatment following aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant.

Methods: This was a cohort study that used the database of the Safari study, on estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) post-menopausal advanced breast cancer previously treated with fulvestrant (UMIN000015168). We created Kaplan-Meier curves for TTF treated with MPA. Further, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox hazard model of the clinicopathological factors involved in the TTF of MPA.

Results: Fist, we made Kaplan-Meier curves by treatment line for MPA in TTF analysis population 1 (n = 244), excluding HER2+ and HER2 with unknown status. The median TTF for MPA was 8.2 months (95% CI 5.1–14.9) for first- and second-line treatments, 3.0 months (95% CI 2.5–3.9) for third-line treatment, and 4.1 months (95% CI 3.5–5.0) for fourth or later treatment lines. The first- and second-line treatments had significantly longer TTF than the third-line treatment (P &lt; 0.001) and fourth-line or later treatments (P &lt; 0.001). No difference in TTF was observed between the third and fourth or later treatment lines. Similar results were obtained in the analysis population 2 (n = 203) for TTF, excluding cases in which MPA was considered to have been used in palliative care. The median TTF for MPA was 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-16.0) for first- and second-line treatments, 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8–4.6) for third-line treatment, and 4.3 months (95% CI 3.7–5.6) for fourth or later treatment lines. The first- and second-line treatments had significantly longer TTF than the third-line treatment (P &lt; 0.001) and the fourth-line or later treatments (P &lt; 0.001). No difference in TTF was observed between the third and fourth or later treatment lines. Second, Table 1 shows the clinicopathological factors involved in the TTF of MPA. In univariate analysis, long DFI (≥ 6 years), small nuclear or histological grade, and the presence of visceral metastases correlated with significantly long TTF (P &lt; 0.05). Whereas PgR, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant endocrine therapy did not affect the TTF of patients treated with MPA. However, in the multivariate regression analysis, only longer DFI (≥ 6 years) was correlated with a significantly longer TTF. Third, we compared the clinicopathologic factors in the groups that received MPA as the fourth or later treatment lines and achieved a TTF of more than 1 year with those that did not. There were no characteristic clinicopathological factors distinct between the two groups.

Conclusion: In actual clinical practice, patients treated with MPA alone as the fourth or subsequent treatment lines showed a TTF of 4 months, suggesting that there is merit in using MPA even in late treatment lines, especially in patients with long DFI and those who are difficult to treat with other antineoplastic agents.

Table 1. Univariate and Multivariate analyses to investigate association between clinicopathological factors and TTF of MPA (n=170)

Citation Format: Kaho Utsunomiya, Hidetoshi Kawaguchi, Yutaka Yamamoto, Shigehira Saji, Norikazu Masuda, Takahiro Nakayama, Kenjiro Aogi, Keisei Anan, Shoichiro Ohtani, Nobuaki Sato, Toshimi Takano, Eriko Tokunaga, Seigo Nakamura, Yoshie Hasegawa, Masaya Hattori, Tomomi Fujisawa, Satoshi Morita, Miki Yamaguchi, Toshinari Yamashita, Daisuke Yotsumoto, Masakazu Toi, Shinji Ohno. Retrospective study using database for the effectiveness of medroxyprogesterone acetate in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal advanced breast cancer: An additional analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-15.

Abstract P1-12-08: Biomarker analysis of hepatotoxicity in a Phase II study of nivolumab, abemaciclib and endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: WJOG11418BTR NEWFLAME_TR

Background Previously, we reported the clinical outcomes of the combination of anti-PD-1 Ab, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, and endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER positive/HER2 negative advanced breast cancer in SABCS2020; biomarker analysis has been performed to provide insight into the hepatotoxicy frequently observed in the study. Methods Subjects received 240 mg nivolumab IV on days 1 and 15, 150 mg abemaciclib PO twice daily, and either 500 mg fulvestrant (FUL) on days 1, 15, 29, and every 4 weeks thereafter (FUL cohort) or 2.5 mg letrozole (LET) once daily (LET cohort). The primary endpoint was objective response rate and secondary endpoints included toxicity evaluated in the CTCAE along with an exploratory endpoint as related to the biomarker analysis. Archival tumor tissues were collected before study entry and blood and stool samples were collected at baseline and on cycle3 day1. Tumor tissues were subjected to IHC analysis and RNA sequencing followed by subtyping using NGS. High throughput cytokine analysis using ELISA-based assay were performed with serum samples and cell sorting analysis of PBMC was performed with FACS. Results From June 2019 to December 2019, 17 subjects were enrolled (FUL cohort [n = 12], LET cohort [n = 5]). The study was prematurely closed due to safety concerns such as hepatotoxicity and interstitial lung disease. AEs ≥ Grade 3 were observed in 91.7% and 100% of patients in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. The most frequent AEs ≥ Grade 3 were elevated liver function tests (LFT; FUL cohort: 50.0%, LET cohort: 60.0%). Serum cytokine analysis from the subjects with severe hepatotoxicity indicated cytokine storm with elevations of sCD30/TNFRSF8, IL-11, -34, Pentraxin-3, sTNF-R1, -R2, TSLP, which was supported by the findings of reduction of effector regulatory T cells in PBMC. IHC study in liver biopsy from three subjects with the toxicity revealed infiltration of CD8+ T cells and FOXP3+ T reg into the liver, suggesting the immune related liver injury upon the treatment with nivolumab and abemaciclib. HLA typing was performed in the 17 patients but no association between HLA type and ILD or hepatotoxicity were observed. Conclusions The frequent and severe immune related hepatotoxicity induced by the combination of anti-DD-1 and CDK 4/6 inhibitors might have been an immune-boosting therapy as suggested in the preclinical studies. This study was supported by the Ono Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. The registration number of the study is UMIN000036970.

Citation Format: Junji Tsurutani, Jun Masuda, Norikazu Masuda, Yuko Tanabe, Tsutomu Iwasa, Masato Takahashi, Manabu Futamura, Koji Matsumoto, Kenjiro Aogi, Hiroji Iwata, Mari Hosonaga, Toru Mukohara, Kiyoshi Yoshimura, Chiyo K. Imamura, Sakiko Miura, Toshiko Yamochi, Kenichi Yoshimura, Toshimi Takano, Hidetaka Kawabata. Biomarker analysis of hepatotoxicity in a Phase II study of nivolumab, abemaciclib and endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: WJOG11418BTR NEWFLAME_TR [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-08.

Abstract P5-02-42: Soluble CD163 may be a predictive biomarker of the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (WJOG9917BTR)

Background: We have conducted a phase II trial (WJOG9917B) to evaluate efficacy of triple therapy with nivolumab, paclitaxel and bevacizumab in patients (pts) with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Although soluble CD163 has been reported as a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of nivolumab in melanoma, however the data is limited in breast cancer. In an ancillary study (WJOG9917BTR), serum level of soluble CD163 were evaluated to elucidate this question. Methods: The main study enrolled 57 pts and showed that median Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 14.0 months and 32.5 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 29.5 months. We have collected blood samples from consenting patients. Serum samples were collected at pretreatment, cycle 1 day 8 and other time points, which were used to measure the concentrations of cytokines, chemokines, and other surrogate proteins. PFS, OS, and response were analyzed in association with the biomarker data using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank tests as appropriate. Results: Biomarker study included 50 pts (36 with recurrent BC and 14 with de novo stage IV BC). The median amount of soluble CD163 before treatment was 562.3 (pg/ml) (range: 158.7-1518.0), and the baseline CD163 levels were higher in pts with recurrent than de novo stage IV (p = 0.0099). Other clinical factors including tumor subtypes, liver metastasis, response, PFS or OS were not significantly associated with the baseline CD163 levels. The kinetic changes in serum soluble CD163 after treatment were divided into two groups; one group (30 patients, CD163 increased group) had increased soluble CD163 immediately after administration (Cycle 1 Day 8), with a median PFS of 18.2; the other group (20 patients, CD163 decreased group) had decreased CD163 immediately after administration, with a median PFS of 13.6. There was a significantly difference in PFS between these two groups (hazard ratio 0.50 [0.26-0.93], log-rank test, p = 0.0263), but not in OS (p = 0.0548). These results suggested that the early change of serum soluble CD163 may be a predictive biomarker of efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in pts with HER2-negative MBC. Conclusions: Soluble CD163 may be a predictive biomarker for early detection of the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in pts with HER2-negative MBC. (UMIN000029590)

Citation Format: Toru Mukohara, Yukinori Ozaki, Shigehisa Kitano, Makiko Yamashita, Daiki Ikarashi, Junji Tsurutani, Tsutomu Iwasa, Masato Takahashi, Norikazu Masuda, Manabu Futamura, Hironobu Minami, Koji Matsumoto, Yuko Tanabe, Hidetaka Kawabata, Kenichi Yoshimura, Toshimi Takano. Soluble CD163 may be a predictive biomarker of the efficacy of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (WJOG9917BTR). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-42.

Abstract GS2-01: GS2-01 Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice in patients with HER2+ unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: primary results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast02

In DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) and DESTINY-Breast03 (NCT03529110), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated unprecedented activity in patients (pts) with HER2+ (immunohistochemistry 3+; immunohistochemistry 2+/in situ hybridization+) advanced metastatic breast cancer (mBC), leading to regulatory approvals in several countries for HER2+ unresectable/mBC after a prior anti–HER2-based regimen. DESTINY-Breast02 (NCT03523585) is a phase 3 trial of T-DXd vs treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with centrally confirmed HER2+ mBC previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). It acts as a confirmatory study for the pivotal phase 2 DESTINY-Breast01 trial. Here we report the primary results of DESTINY-Breast02.

Methods: Pts with HER2+ mBC were randomized 2:1 to receive T-DXd or TPC (trastuzumab + capecitabine or lapatinib + capecitabine) and stratified by hormone receptor (HR) status (HR+/HR-), prior pertuzumab treatment, and history of visceral disease. The primary endpoint of this time-driven primary analysis was progression-free survival (PFS) as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR). The powered secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by BICR, duration of response (DoR) by BICR, PFS by investigator assessment, safety, and others.

Results: 608 pts were randomized to receive T-DXd (n = 406) or TPC (n = 202). Pts receiving T-DXd and TPC had a median age of 54.2 years (range, 22.4-88.5 years) and 54.7 years (range, 24.7-86.5 years), respectively, with a median of 2 (range, 0-10 and range,1-8) prior lines of systemic therapy (excluding hormone therapy) in the metastatic setting. Median treatment duration was 11.3 mo in the T-DXd arm and ~4.5 mo in the TPC arm. Efficacy and safety results are shown in the table below. T-DXd significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.28-0.45; P &lt;0.000001) and OS (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; P = 0.0021) compared with TPC. Confirmed ORR was 69.7% (14% complete response) with T-DXd and 29.2% (5.0% complete response) with TPC. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 52.7% and 44.1% of pts receiving T-DXd and TPC, respectively. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurred in 10.4% of pts with T-DXd vs 0.5% of pts with TPC. In pts receiving T-DXd, most ILD cases (88.1%) were grade 1/2 and grade 5 ILD was reported in 2 (0.5%) pts.

Conclusions: Results from DESTINY-Breast02 confirmed the clinical benefit and superiority of T-DXd over conventional chemotherapy-based regimens in pts with HER2+ mBC previously treated with T-DM1, as evidenced by significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PFS and OS. These data, together with earlier reported results from the DESTINY-Breast03 study of T-DXd vs T-DM1 solidify T-DXd as an optimal treatment option in pts with progressive HER2+ mBC across broad settings.

Editorial Acknowledgment

Under guidance of the authors, assistance in medical writing and editorial support was provided by Caylin Bosch, PhD, of ApotheCom, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo.

Funding

This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Table. Summary of Efficacy and Safety Results for T-DXd and TPC in Patients With HER2+ mBC Previously Treated With T-DM1

Citation Format: Ian Krop, Yeon H. Park, Sung-Bae Kim, Giuliano Borges, Sercan Aksoy, Joaquin Gavila Gregori, Rebecca Roylance, Elgene Lim, Rinat Yerushalmi, Flora Zagouri, Francois P. Duhoux, Tanja Fehm, Toshimi Takano, Anton Egorov, Iris Wu, Jillian Cathcart, Changan Chu, Fabrice Andre. GS2-01 Trastuzumab deruxtecan vs physician’s choice in patients with HER2+ unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine: primary results of the randomized, phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast02 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-01.

The impact of obesity and endocrine therapy on the prognosis of premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A single-institute retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with worse prognosis in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer (BC). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for obese premenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of obesity and adjuvant endocrine therapy on prognosis in premenopausal patients with BC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical record of premenopausal women who received curative surgery for clinical stage I-III HR-positive BC from 2007 to 2017. Patients were classified into five groups according to BMI: underweight (UW), normal weight (NW), obese 1 degree (OB1), obese 2 degree (OB2), and obese 3 degree (OB3) categories. The primary analysis was a comparison of BC-specific survival (BCSS) according to BMI (UW/NW vs. OB1-3) and adjuvant endocrine therapy (with or without ovarian function suppression [OFS]). Of 13 021 patients, the data of 3380 patients were analyzed. BCSS in OB1-3 patients was significantly worse than that in patients with UW/NW (hazard ratio [HR] 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-4.02: p = .0009). In OB1-3 patients who received tamoxifen (TAM), BCSS was significantly worse than that in UW/NW patients (p = .0086); however, a significant difference was not shown in patients who received TAM and OFS (p = .0921).

CONCLUSION

High BMI was associated with worse prognosis in premenopausal patients with HR-positive BC who received adjuvant TAM. The role of OFS as adjuvant endocrine therapy remains unclear, and further studies are required to explore the adequate management of obese premenopausal patients.

[Challenges to International Collaborative Clinical Research and Approval Disparities]

The standard treatment and prognosis of breast cancer are improving as because of international collaborative clinical research. Generally, the standard treatment for breast cancer in Japan is not different from that in the US, Europe or other Asian countries, however, some novel agents have not been developed or have been delayed. For example, no institution in Japan has participated in the clinical trials of sacituzumab-govitecan. Institutions in Japan participated in the clinical trial of alpelisib and neratinib, however, the development of these drugs was delayed due to the racial difference and lack of a company in charge. On the other hand, there are international collaborative trials that Japan has participated in or has taken the lead, such as POSITIVE trial, CREATE-X trial, and PATHWAY trial. There are many challenges for Japan to participate in or lead international collaborative trials with Europe, US, or Asia. It is necessary to build a network and infrastructure for international collaborative trials based on the cooperation between the institutions and clinical trial groups in the world.

Transcriptomic intratumor heterogeneity of breast cancer patient-derived organoids may reflect the unique biological features of the tumor of origin

BACKGROUND

The intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) of cancer cells plays an important role in breast cancer resistance and recurrence. To develop better therapeutic strategies, it is necessary to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying ITH and their functional significance. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) have recently been utilized in cancer research. They can also be used to study ITH as cancer cell diversity is thought to be maintained within the organoid line. However, no reports investigated intratumor transcriptomic heterogeneity in organoids derived from patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to investigate transcriptomic ITH in breast cancer PDOs.

METHODS

We established PDO lines from ten patients with breast cancer and performed single-cell transcriptomic analysis. First, we clustered cancer cells for each PDO using the Seurat package. Then, we defined and compared the cluster-specific gene signature (ClustGS) corresponding to each cell cluster in each PDO.

RESULTS

Cancer cells were clustered into 3-6 cell populations with distinct cellular states in each PDO line. We identified 38 clusters with ClustGS in 10 PDO lines and used Jaccard similarity index to compare the similarity of these signatures. We found that 29 signatures could be categorized into 7 shared meta-ClustGSs, such as those related to the cell cycle or epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and 9 signatures were unique to single PDO lines. These unique cell populations appeared to represent the characteristics of the original tumors derived from patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the existence of transcriptomic ITH in breast cancer PDOs. Some cellular states were commonly observed in multiple PDOs, whereas others were specific to single PDO lines. The combination of these shared and unique cellular states formed the ITH of each PDO.

Effect of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan on QT/QTc Interval and Pharmacokinetics in HER2-Positive or HER2-Low Metastatic/Unresectable Breast Cancer

HER2-targeted anticancer therapies may be associated with cardiovascular adverse events. This study evaluated effects of the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd, DS-8201a) on QT/QTc interval and its pharmacokinetics. Patients with heavily pretreated, metastatic HER2-expressing breast cancer were enrolled at seven study sites in Japan. T-DXd was administered intravenously at 6.4 mg/kg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary end points were baseline-adjusted QTcF interval and pharmacokinetics parameters. Key secondary end points included safety events, serum concentration of T-DXd and DXd at the time of electrocardiographic measurements, and antitumor activity parameters. Among 51 total patients, 47 (92.2%) had HER2-low breast cancer (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ and in situ hybridization-negative/equivocal/missing). Pharmacokinetic parameters after a single dose of T-DXd were consistent with previous studies. After multiple doses, T-DXd showed moderate accumulation (accumulation ratio (cycle 3/cycle 1), 1.35), but DXd showed minimal accumulation (1.09). The upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for mean ΔQTcF interval was < 10 ms at all timepoints, and at mean maximum serum concentration was also < 10 ms. Based on concentration-QT analysis, ΔQTcF increased with increasing concentrations of T-DXd and DXd. No clinically meaningful QTcF prolongation was observed. T-DXd had a manageable safety profile and showed antitumor activity in HER2-low breast cancer. In this study, a T-DXd dose of 6.4 mg/kg, higher than the 5.4-mg/kg dose currently approved for breast cancer, was not associated with clinically relevant QTcF prolongation in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-expressing metastatic breast cancer. This study adds to our understanding of T-DXd for treatment of HER2-low breast cancer.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: A DESTINY-Breast01 Subgroup Analysis

DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) evaluated trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; DS-8201) in patients with heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We present a subgroup of 24 patients with a history of treated brain metastases (BM), a population with limited treatment options. In patients with BMs, the confirmed objective response rate (cORR) was 58.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.6%-77.9%], and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 18.1 months (95% CI, 6.7-18.1 months). In patients without BMs (n = 160), cORR was 61.3% and mPFS was 16.4 months. Eight patients (47.1%) experienced a best overall intracranial response of partial response or complete response. Seven patients (41.2%) had a best percentage change in brain lesion diameter from baseline consistent with stable disease. Two patients (8.3%) with BMs and two (1.3%) without BMs experienced progression in the brain. The safety profile of T-DXd was consistent with previous studies. The durable clinical activity of T-DXd in this population warrants further investigation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Advances in treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer have greatly improved patient outcomes, but intracranial progression remains an important risk for which few therapeutic options are currently available. T-DXd demonstrated durable efficacy in patients with stable, treated BMs. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2711.

Data of programmed death-ligand 1 expression and VEGF: Nivolumab, bevacizumab and paclitaxel For HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

The purpose was to explore potential biomarkers of the efficacy and toxicity of triple therapy of nivolumab, bevacizumab and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Tumor tissues before treatment and blood samples at pretreatment, during and after treatment were collected. The serum samples were used to measure the concentrations of cytokines. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response were analyzed in association with the biomarker data using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests. Fifty patients were included in the biomarker analysis. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells and immune cells were evaluated in tumor tissue samples using a Dako 28-8 immunohistochemistry assay and using a VENTANA SP142 immunohistochemistry assay. PD-L1 positive rates using anti-PD-L1 antibodies 28-8 (Combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and SP142 (Immune cells [IC] ≥1) were 15% and 17%, respectively. The PFS and OS were not significantly different in the subgroups by PD-L1 expression. The median pretreatment vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A concentration was 116.1 pg/ml (range 0–740.23 pg/ml) on day 1 and decreased to <37 pg/ml on day 8 of cycle 1 in all patients. Subtypes (hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative or triple negative breast cancer), stage (recurrent or de novo stage IV) and liver metastasis (yes or no) were not significantly different between patients in VEGF-A high and VEGF-A low groups. PFS in the VEGF-A high group was similar to that in the VEGF-A low group.

Pertuzumab retreatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a randomized, open-label phase III study (PRECIOUS)

No standard options existed for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐positive advanced breast cancer that progresses after second‐line trastuzumab emtansine therapy before 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of pertuzumab retreatment after disease progression following pertuzumab‐containing therapy for HER2‐positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer for the first time. This randomized, open‐label, multicenter phase III trial was undertaken in 93 sites in Japan. Eligible patients with HER2‐positive breast cancer who had received pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy as first‐ and/or second‐line therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to: (i) pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and physician's choice chemotherapy (PTC), or (ii) trastuzumab and physician's choice chemotherapy (TC). The primary end‐point was investigator‐assessed progression‐free survival (PFS). Between August 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018, 219 patients were randomized to PTC (n = 110) or TC (n = 109). Median follow‐up was 14.2 months (interquartile range, 9.0–22.2), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0–6.6) with PTC and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2–4.8) with TC (stratified hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI upper limit 0.967]; p = 0.022). Progression‐free survival was improved by adding pertuzumab in all prespecified subgroups. The PTC arm showed a trend towards better overall survival and duration of response, but similar objective response and health‐related quality of life. The incidence of treatment‐related adverse events was similar between groups except for diarrhea. Pertuzumab retreatment contributes to disease control for HER2‐positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab‐containing regimens.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Primary results and biomarker data from a phase 2 trial (WJOG9917B)

BACKGROUND

Preclinical models revealed potential synergistic effects of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. Therefore, we investigated the use of nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel triple therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

This phase 2, multicentre, single-arm study (NEWBEAT) investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. The primary end-point was objective response rate. Key secondary end-points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities. A biomarker study evaluated tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and serum VEGF-A levels.

RESULTS

Between February 2018 and October 2018, 57 patients were enrolled. An objective response rate was seen in 39/56 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9-81.2%), meeting the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 74% in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer versus 59% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.0 (95% CI 11.0-16.3) and 32.5 (95% CI 26.0-not evaluable) months, respectively (median follow-up: 29.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse drug reactions occurred in 33 of 57 patients (58%). There were no grade 5 adverse events. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 43 of 57 patients (75%), with grade 3/4 events in eight patients (14%). Biomarker analysis showed that tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was not correlated with the efficacy of triple therapy. Efficacy outcomes were similar between the serum VEGF-high and VEGF-low groups.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Factors associated with overall survival after recurrence in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative postmenopausal breast cancer: an ad hoc analysis of the JBCRG-C06 Safari study

BACKGROUND

The Safari study (UMIN000015168) was a retrospective, multicenter study in which 1072 consecutive cases of estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer treated using 500 mg fulvestrant were registered. We previously reported the relationship between the patient factors and overall survival after the diagnosis using the same cases and the same factors for the analysis of time to treatment failure in patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. The current study is an ad hoc analysis that focused on the relationship between the patient factors and overall survival after recurrence by adding factors generally associated with overall survival after recurrence.

METHODS

The overall survival after recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative recurrent breast cancer was analyzed via univariate and multivariate analyses with a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

A total of 598 cases were used for the analysis of overall survival after recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that favorable overall survival (median, 6.4 years) was significantly correlated with long time from recurrence to fulvestrant use (≥3 years), low nuclear or histological grade (G3 vs. G1), long time to treatment failure of initial palliative endocrine therapy (≥12 months) and long time to initial palliative chemotherapy (≥2 years).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that sequential endocrine monotherapy may be a useful treatment option for patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative recurrent breast cancer who have been successfully treated with initial long-term palliative endocrine therapy.

Abstract P1-15-02: Low incidence of hepatitis B reactivation after chemotherapy in Japanese breast cancer patients with resolved HBV

Background: Recently, chemotherapy-induced reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been reported not only in patients with HBV surface antigen positive (HBsAg+) but also in patients with resolved HBV (HBsAg-, anti-HBV-core antibody positive (anti-HBc+). The incidnce of HBV reactivation after adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in patients with resolved HBV infection remains unclear. In this study, we surveyed the incidence of HBV reactivation in Japanese breast cancer patients who received adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 3042 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy from June 2008 to December 2016 were included in this study. HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBV-surface antibody (anti-HBs) were tested before chemotherapy. Serum HBV-DNA levels were subsequently measured and monitored for one year after the completion of adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy if the patient exhibited a resolved HBV infection. Results: Of the 3042 patients (pts), 32 (1.05%)cases were positive for HBsAg and 2992 pts were negative for HBsAg. 301 pts (9.9 %) were revealed resolved HBV infection; 221 pts were with anti-HBc+ and anti-HBs+, 40 pts were with anti-HBc+ and anti-HBs-, and 130 pts were with anti-HBc- and anti-HBs+. Of the 130 pts with anti-HBc- and anti-HBs+, 77 pts were previously vaccinated for hepatitis B. The antibody-positive rate by age group was 2.7% (1/37) for patients in their 20s, 4.1% (14/344) for those in their 30s, 6.5% (67/1037) for those in their 40s, 9.4% (77/817) for those in their 50s, 16.6% (109/655) for those in their 60s, 20% (30/150) for those in their 70s, and 0% (0/2) for those in their 80s. Among the 301 pts with resolved HBV infection, 71 pts were monitored for one year after the completion of their chemotherapy. The median monitoring period was 579 days (386-3458). In our monitoring period, only one patient (1.4%) was diagnosed with HBV reactivation based on a slightly elevated HBV-DNA level at 1-year-test. No death or hepatitis due to HBV reactivation occurred during the monitoring period. Conclusions: The prevalence of resolved HBV infection in Japan showed an increasing trend with age. Adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with resolved HBV infection has a risk of HBV reactivation. Our study suggested the risk of reactivation was low and the risk of a flare of HBV disease could be controlled with screening and carefully monitoring.

Citation Format: Takayo Fukuda, Masaya Hattori, Yukinori Ozaki, Lina Inagaki, Mari Hosonaga, Ippei Fukada, Kokoro Kobayashi, Fumikata Hara, Takayuki Kobayashi, Sachiyo Yoshio, Takayuki Ueno, Toshimi Takano, Shinji Ohno. Low incidence of hepatitis B reactivation after chemotherapy in Japanese breast cancer patients with resolved HBV [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-15-02.

Abstract P4-11-06: Effect of suppressed ovarian function on prognosis of premenopausal obese women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A single-institute retrospective study

Background: Obesity is related to poor prognosis in pre- and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the optimal adjuvant hormone therapy for obese premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We examined the impact of ovarian function suppression (OFS) on the prognosis of obese women with primary hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed premenopausal women who received curative surgery for clinical stage I-III hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research from January 2007 to December 2017. All patients were classified into five groups according to body mass index (BMI): underweight (UW), BMI &lt;18.5 kg/m2; normal weight (NW), 18.5-24.9 kg/m2; obese 1 degree (OB1), 25.0-29.9 kg/m2; obese 2 degree (OB2), 30.0-34.9 kg/m2; and obese 3 degree (OB3), ≥35 kg/m2. The primary analysis was a comparison of breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) according to BMI (UW/NW vs. OB1-3) and adjuvant hormonal therapy (with or without OFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS). Results: Overall, the total number of patients was 13,021 and the data of 3,380 patients were analyzed, which included patients who received adjuvant tamoxifen (TAM) without OFS (n = 1,836) or with OFS (n = 670). The median follow-up duration was 5.9 years (range, 0.2-12.9). The numbers of patients with UW, NW, OB1, OB2, and OB3 were 404 (12%), 2,482 (73%), 399 (12%), 78 (2%), and 17 (1%), respectively. Obesity was significantly associated with higher stage of breast cancer (p &lt;0.0001). Nuclear grade of breast cancer in OB1-3 patients was significantly higher than that in UW/NW patients (p = 0.0323). BCSS in OB1-3 patients was significantly worse than that in patients with UW/NW (hazard ratio [HR] 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-4.02: p = 0.0009). In OB1-3 patients who received TAM as adjuvant hormone therapy, BCSS was significantly worse than that in UW/NW patients (p = 0.0086); however, a significant difference was not shown in patients who received TAM and OFS (p = 0.0921). Multivariate analysis revealed that OB3 was an independent prognostic factor compared with NW in patients with stage II/III breast cancer (p = 0.0162).Conclusion: High BMI was associated with worse prognosis in premenopausal patients with HR-positive breast cancer. The negative impact of obesity might be canceled by adding OFS to TAM as adjuvant hormone therapy. Further studies are required to explore the adequate management of obese premenopausal patients.

Citation Format: Yukinori Ozaki, Jun Masuda, Akemi Kataoka, Takahiro Kogawa, Tomomi Abe, Hidetomo Morizono, Lina Inagaki, Fumikata Hara, Toshimi Takano, Takayuki Ueno, Shinji Ohno. Effect of suppressed ovarian function on prognosis of premenopausal obese women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A single-institute retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-06.

Abstract OT2-19-02: Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and liquid molecular analysis of abemaciclib rechallenge upon progression to abemaciclib combination therapies for ER-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients

Background: Abemaciclib is a drug approved for ER-positive and HER2-negative metastatic or recurrent breast cancer and those treatable in an early setting. Some patients with ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer pretreated with abemaciclib and endocrine therapy may still benefit from abemaciclib rechallenge, especially in case of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy. However, there is no evidence for abemaciclib rechallenge. To address this, a single-arm phase 2 trial is planned to determine whether abemaciclib rechallenge has clinical benefits. Translational research to evaluate the gene alteration and immunohistochemistry will be conducted as an accompanying research to determine the predictive biomarkers of resistance or sensitivity to abemaciclib. Patients and Methods: The eligible patients are histologically confirmed with ER-positive and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, and previously received no more than two lines of endocrine therapy. The patients who previously received abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy led to a clinical benefit, including complete response, partial response, or stable disease, during abemaciclib-based treatment (≥6 months). The patients who previously received chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (excluding perioperative systemic treatment), everolimus, olaparib, and palbociclib for advanced or metastatic diseases are excluded. The patients will be treated with abemaciclib 150 mg orally q12h on days 1 to 28 of a 28-day cycle. The other endocrine drug prescribed was not used in previous treatment. We will evaluate the gene mutations and/or amplification of ESR1, PIK3CA, CCNE1, FGFR1, RB1, TP53, NF1, MYC, AR, and MET at the time of inclusion and three months after day 1 and ctDNA and immunostaining levels of HER3, PTEN, CCNE1, FGFR1/2, and AR at the time of inclusion. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints are overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, chemotherapy-free interval, overall survival (OS), safety, and evaluation of the mechanism of sensitivity and resistance to abemaciclib. The expected median PFS for the study treatment arm is 5.0 months compared to the previous data of 3.0 months. The number of necessary cases is 59, with a significance level of 5% (two-sided) and power of 80% during the two-year recruitment period and one-year follow-up period. In the planned total of 65 cases, 10% is considered inappropriate. The planned duration of enrollment and follow-up is two years and one year, respectively. The planned total study duration is four years. Subgroup analysis will be performed on ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations, disease site (visceral/bone only/other), previous lines of therapy for advanced or metastatic disease (first and second), endocrine therapy for pretreatment (aromatase inhibitors/fuluvestrant), performance status (0/1), organs involved (1/2/≥3), age (&lt;65/≥65 years), and disease-free interval (&lt;36 months/≥36 months) to examine the interaction of treatment effects on PFS and OS. This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company.

Citation Format: Meiko Nishimura, Takahiro Kogawa, Yuko Akaishi, Misato Ogata, Jun Masuda, Mitsuo Terada, Hitomi Sakai, Kazuki Nozawa, Sasagu Kurozumi, Takamichi Yokoe, Yukinori Ozaki Ozaki, Shu Yazaki, Mai Onishi, Tsutomu Iwasa, Takuma Onoe, Yuta Okumura, Sayaka Nakayama, Kanako Hagio, Yuko Takahashi, Hirokazu Tanino, Junji Tsurutani, Koji Matsumoto, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Toshimi Takano. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and liquid molecular analysis of abemaciclib rechallenge upon progression to abemaciclib combination therapies for ER-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-02.