1
|
Meagher M, Krause H, Elliott A, Farrell A, Antonarakis ES, Bastos B, Heath EI, Jamieson C, Stewart TF, Bagrodia A, Nabhan C, Oberley M, McKay RR, Salmasi A. Characterization and impact of non-canonical WNT signaling on outcomes of urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7148. [PMID: 38558536 PMCID: PMC10983807 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-canonical WNT family (WNT5A pathway) signaling via WNT5A through ROR1 and its partner, ROR2, or Frizzled2 (FZD2) is linked to processes driving tumorigenesis and therapy resistance. We utilized a large dataset of urothelial carcinoma (UC) tumors to characterize non-canonical WNT signaling through WNT5A, ROR1, ROR2, or FZD2 expression. METHODS NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592 genes or WES)/RNA (WTS) was performed for 4125 UC tumors submitted to Caris Life Sciences. High and low expression of WNT5A, ROR1, ROR2, and FZD2 was defined as ≥ top and RESULTS WNT5A pathway gene expression varied significantly between primary versus metastatic sites: WNT5A (25.2 vs. 16.8 TPM), FZD2 (3.2 vs. 4.05), ROR1 (1.7 vs. 2.1), and ROR2 (2.4 vs. 2.6) p < 0.05 for all. Comparison of high- and low-expression subgroups revealed variation in the prevalence of TP53, FGFR3, and RB1 pathogenic mutations, as well as increasing T cell-inflamed scores as expression of the target gene increased. High gene expression for ROR2 (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.50, p < 0.001) and FZD2 (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, p = 0.024) was associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION Distinct genomic and immune landscapes for the four investigated WNT5A pathway components were observed in patients with UC. External validation studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Meagher
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Bastos
- Miami Cancer InstituteMiamiFloridaUSA
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Elisabeth I. Heath
- Department of MedicineUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Christina Jamieson
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Tyler F. Stewart
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
- Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitUSA
| | - Amirali Salmasi
- Department of UrologyUC San Diego School of MedicineLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meagher MF, Salmasi A, Stewart TF. Treatment Landscape for Metastatic Castrate-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Review. Res Rep Urol 2023; 15:509-517. [PMID: 38025805 PMCID: PMC10655601 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s398129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
With the advent of new therapeutic modalities, management of metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has been in flux. From androgen-deprivation therapy to docetaxel to androgen receptor-signaling inhibitors, each agent has heralded a new treatment paradigm. As such, the optimal first-line therapy for mCSPC remains incompletely defined. This review provides a narrative of recent advances to systemic therapy within the mCSPC treatment space, particularly with regard to expansion to triplet therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret F Meagher
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Amirali Salmasi
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology and BMT, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson TJ, Meagher MF, Leonard A, Dolendo I, Deshler LN, Morgan KM, Duran EA, Sabater Minarim D, Wang L, Taylor J, Herchenhorn D, Stewart TF, Javier-Desloges J, Salmasi A, McKay RR, Millard F, Rose BS, Bagrodia A. Impact of chemotherapy on anxiety, depression, and suicidality amongst testicular cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
418 Background: Chemotherapy for testicular cancer (TC) is highly effective yet associated with significant consequences on long-term health-related quality of life. We evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on anxiety, depression, and suicidality amongst TC survivors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US veterans diagnosed with TC in the Veterans Health Affairs database from 1990-2016. Patients with non-primary germ cell tumor histologies were excluded. Baseline disease characteristics and treatment received were ascertained from the VA Central Cancer Registry. Anxiety or depression was a composite endpoint comprised of diagnosis codes for anxiety, depression, or administration of medications used to treat these diagnoses. Incident suicidality was defined as a diagnosis code for suicidal ideation. Time to event was defined as time from diagnosis to event or censor at the time of last follow-up. Rates of outcomes were reported through cumulative incidences. Associations with outcomes and receipt of chemotherapy were assessed through multivariable Cox regression models. Results: In total, 1684 patients (1174 seminoma, 510 nonseminoma) were included in the cohort. Median age at diagnosis in the cohort was 40 years old. Median follow up time was 7.67 years for surviving patients. 1506 (89.4%) patients were white, 114 (6.8%) were African American, and 64 (3.8%) were another or unknown race. There were 1066 (63.3%) stage I patients, 191 (11.3%) stage II, 198 (11.8%) stage III, and 229 (13.6%) unknown stage patients. 579 (34.4%) patients received chemotherapy. At the time of diagnosis, 104 (6.2%) patients already experienced anxiety or depression. At 10 years, cumulative incidence of the diagnosis of anxiety or depression as 44.1% in the entire cohort. At 10 years, cumulative incidence of the diagnosis of suicidality was 5.5%. On multivariable Cox regression, factors associated with a higher risk of anxiety or depression were older age at diagnosis (Hazard Ratio (HR): 1.11 per standard deviation increase, p=0.01), being unemployed (HR: 1.25, p=0.01), and receipt of chemotherapy (HR: 1.43, p<0.001). Race, stage, alcohol or tobacco use and seminoma type were nonsignificant. Factors associated with increased risks of suicidality were being unemployed (HR: 2.00, p=0.01) and not being married (HR: 2.50, p=0.001). Stage, age, race, alcohol and tobacco use, seminoma type, and receipt of chemotherapy were not significantly associated with suicidality. Conclusions: Psychosocial morbidity is high among TC survivors. Despite being effective and necessary for maintaining excellent oncologic outcomes, chemotherapy appears to increase the rates of psychosocial morbidity. Socioeconomic risk factors, including employment and marriage, may also impact psychosocial health. Clinicians should be proactive in identifying support systems for TC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luke Wang
- University of California San Diego, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Amir Salmasi
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown JT, Elliott A, Walker P, Xiu J, Nazha B, Stewart TF, Gulati S, Nandagopal L, Goldman J, Kucuk O, Carthon BC, Barata PC, Hoon DSB, McKay RR, Agarwal N, Nabhan C, Korn WM, Bilen MA. Exploration of immunosuppressive features of the tumor microenvironment within hepatic and non-hepatic tumors of urothelial origin. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
562 Background: Recent data suggest that patients with liver metastases (mets) are resistant to immune checkpoint inhibition (CPI) independent of historical biomarkers of CPI efficacy, raising the question of whether liver mets may be associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). We investigated the immune TME of hepatic and non-hepatic mets compared to primary tumors in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) tissue samples. Methods: NextGen sequencing (NGS) of DNA (592-gene/whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) from UC tissue samples (N=4746) was performed at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Immune cell infiltration was estimated by RNA expression deconvolution (MCP-counter). PD-L1 expression (SP142: immune cell stain ≥ 5%; 22c3: CPS ≥ 10) was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Deficient mismatch repair/high microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI-H) was tested by IHC/NGS. Real-world overall survival (OS) information was obtained from insurance claims data and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated. Mann–Whitney U and X2/Fischer-Exact tests were applied where appropriate, with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (Benjamini-Hochberg). *P<0.05. Results: UC samples included 3158 (66.5%) from primary site, 1344 (28.3%) from non-hepatic mets, and 244 (5.1%) from hepatic mets. Compared to primary tumors, hepatic mets had decreased CD8+ T and B cells (0.55* and 0.29-fold*) but increased monocytic lineage cells (1.23-fold*), while non-hepatic mets had increased CD8+ T, NK, and monocytic lineage cells (1.28*, 1.27*, 1.31-fold*) with no difference in B cells (1.05-fold). Hepatic mets had decreased expression of integrin LFA-1/ ITGAL (0.77-fold*), as well as hyaluronic acid (HA) receptor CD44 and synthase HAS2 (0.61 and 0.61-fold*), compared to primary tumors, whereas expression of these genes and LFA-1 ligand ICAM1 was increased in non-hepatic mets (1.08 to 1.30-fold*). Hepatic mets had increased expression of immunosuppressive cytokines CCL2 and CXCL2 (1.72* and 2.32-fold*) and decreased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines CCL5 and CXCL10 (0.63* and 0.79-fold*) compared to primary tumors. PD-L1+ IHC was less frequent in hepatic mets compared to primary tumors and non-hepatic mets. TMB-High (≥10 mut/MB) and dMMR/MSI-H rates were similar across tumor sites. Hepatic mets (N=40) were associated with worse OS from the start of pembrolizumab compared to non-hepatic mets (N=177) (19.6 vs 4.4 months, HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.91-4.75, p<0.0001). Conclusions: This is the largest analysis of hepatic and non-hepatic met TMEs compared to primary tumor in advanced UC. Lower PD-L1 expression and differences in immune TME composition in liver mets may contribute to CPI resistance. Further analysis is warranted to determine underlying molecular mechanisms resulting in a TME that reduces response to CPI for patients with UC and liver mets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Bassel Nazha
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Shuchi Gulati
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Jamie Goldman
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Dunwoody, GA
| | - Omer Kucuk
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Petrylak DP, Stewart TF, Gao X, Berghorn E, Lu H, Chan E, Gedrich R, Lang JM, McKean M. A phase 2 expansion study of ARV-766, a PROTACandrogen receptor (AR) degrader, in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
TPS290 Background: Patients with mCRPC inevitably develop resistance to available therapies and lack curative options. In patients treated with novel hormonal agents (NHAs), mutations can develop in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the AR gene, some of which are associated with resistance to current therapies and disease progression. ARV-766 is a novel, potent, orally bioavailable proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) protein degrader that degrades not only wild-type AR but also clinically relevant AR LBD mutants, including the most prevalent AR L702H, H875Y, and T878A mutations. Here we describe a phase 2 expansion study to evaluate the clinical activity and safety of ARV-766 in men with mCRPC who have experienced disease progression on prior NHA therapy. Methods: This phase 2 cohort expansion is part of an open-label, first-in-human, phase 1/2 clinical trial of ARV-766 in men (aged ≥18 years) with histologically, pathologically, or cytologically confirmed mCRPC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1. Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog or inhibitor or orchiectomy is required. Patients enrolled in the cohort expansion must have received 1–3 prior NHAs (eg, abiraterone or enzalutamide) and ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Following completion of dose escalation in the phase 1 portion of the study, which is evaluating the safety and tolerability of ARV-766, 2 doses (100 mg and 300 mg administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles) were selected for the phase 2 cohort expansion. The primary objectives of the cohort expansion study are to evaluate the antitumor activity of ARV-766 based on the overall response rate (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and the rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines of 30% (PSA30) and 50% (PSA50). Enrollment in the phase 2 expansion study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05067140 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Xin Gao
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Meredith McKean
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stewart TF, Shenoy A, Stuart SM, McClintock K, Bagaria S, So T, Bagrodia A, Salmasi A, Kader AK, Monga M, Buckley J, Shabaik A, Larson MH, McKay RR. Comparison of urine cell-free DNA with blood-based screening for detection of bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
457 Background: Plasma cell-free DNA (pcfDNA) has shown great promise for non-invasive, multi-cancer early detection (MCED), but has lower sensitivity for early-stage urological cancers due to low tumor fraction in plasma. Urine cfDNA (ucfDNA) has the potential to improve detection and monitoring of early-stage urological cancers due to its proximity to the affected organs and ease of collection. We conducted an exploratory study to assess the utility of methylation patterns in ucfDNA to detect BC in patients with suspicious bladder lesions, and compare to detection using matched pcfDNA. Methods: Urine and blood were collected from patients with suspicion of new (N=17) or recurrent (N=20) non-muscle invasive BC (NMIBC), and from non-cancer (NC) patients with urological conditions (N=16). Patients with suspicion of NMIBC were diagnosed and staged by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and conventional imaging. Tumor allele fraction (TAF) estimates from ucfDNA were inferred using a method trained on methylation patterns enriched in BC tissue (N=49) relative to an external reference dataset of NC ucfDNA (N=176). We set a detection threshold, using a maximum TAF value from a separate set of NC urine samples (N=50), to determine ucfDNA sensitivity for detecting BC in our study. Sensitivity in pcfDNA was determined using a validated MCED test classifier at 99% specificity. Results: Of 17 patients with suspicion of new NMIBC, 12 were diagnosed with BC after TURBT (Stage 0: N=6, I: N=5, II: N=1), and 10/12 were high grade (HG). Among patients with confirmed BC, ucfDNA sensitivity was 91.7% overall (11/12; 95% CI 61.5-99.8%) and 90% for HG (9/10). Whereas, pcfDNA sensitivity was 16.7% overall (2/12) and 10.0% for HG (1/10). Of 20 patients with suspicion of recurrent NMIBC, 14 were confirmed as BC (Stage 0: N=10, I: N=2, II: N=2) and 11/14 were HG. Sensitivity of ucfDNA for recurrence detection was 78.6% overall (11/14; 95% CI 49.2-95.3%), and 100% for HG (11/11), while pcfDNA sensitivity was 14.3% (2/14) overall and 18.2% (2/11) for HG. Notably, TAF in urine from NC patients (N=16) and patients with suspicion of new NMIBC found to be benign by TURBT (N=5) were all below the detection threshold. Among patients with suspicion of recurrent NMIBC but not found to have BC by TURBT, TAF estimates for 4/6 (66.7%) were above the detection threshold. Conclusions: We observed increased sensitivity in urine compared to matched plasma in patients with NMIBC, consistent with local shedding of bladder tumors into stored urine. A urine-based cfDNA assay with high sensitivity at high specificity, combined with non-invasive sampling, could be an ideal tool to use alongside the standard of care (e.g., cystoscopy) for clinical diagnosis and monitoring of BC. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and determine the clinical utility of ucfDNA in the diagnosis and surveillance of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Archana Shenoy
- GRAIL, LLC, a subsidiary of Illumina, Inc., Menlo Park, CA
| | | | | | | | - Tiffany So
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | - Manoj Monga
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Jill Buckley
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ahmed Shabaik
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Rana R. McKay
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salmasi A, Krause H, Elliott A, Farrell AP, Antonarakis ES, Bastos BR, Heath EI, Jamieson C, Stewart TF, Bagrodia A, Nabhan C, Oberley MJ, Korn WM, McKay RR. Characterization and impact of Wnt5A signaling on outcomes of urothelial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
560 Background: Active Wnt signaling via WNT5A through ROR1 and its partner, ROR2, or WNT5A/frizzled 2 (FZD2) is linked to processes driving tumorigenesis, disease progression and therapy resistance. The role of this pathway in the pathogenesis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) is not fully elucidated. In adult tissue, ROR1 is largely absent, which makes it ideal for targeted therapies, with several ROR1 targeting agents in early clinical development. We utilized a large dataset of molecularly characterized UC tumors to investigate the significance of Wnt5a/ ROR1, ROR2 or FZD2 transcriptional expression. Methods: NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592 genes or WES)/RNA (WTS) was performed for 4743 UC tumors submitted to Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). PD-L1 expression (SP142; Positive (+): ³2+, ³%5) was tested by IHC. Gene expression profiles were analyzed for a transcriptional signature predictive of response to immunotherapy (T cell-inflamed; Bao, 2020). WNT5a, ROR1, ROR2, and FZD2-high and -low expression were defined as ³ top and < bottom quartile of transcripts per million (TPM), respectively. Mann-Whitney U and X2/Fisher-Exact tests were applied where appropriate, with P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons ( q < .05). Real-world overall survival (OS) information was obtained from insurance claims data and Kaplan Meier estimates were calculated for molecularly defined cohorts. Results: We observed similar expression of these WNT5A signaling pathway genes between upper (N=795) and lower tract UC (N=3,204): WNT5A (22.7 v. 22.2 median TMP (mTPM), q = .18), FZD2 (3.4 v 3.5, q = .93), ROR1 (2.0 v. 1.7, q = .05), and ROR2 (2.1 v 2.5, q < .01). WNT family gene expression varied significantly between primary (N=2,756) and metastatic sites (N=1,361): WTN5A (25.2 v 16.8 mTPM), FZD2 (3.2 v 4.05), ROR1 (1.7 v 2.1), and ROR2 (2.4 v 2.6) for primary vs. metastatic sites respectively ( q < .05 for all). Comparison of high- and low-expression subgroups revealed variation in the prevalence of TP53, FGFR3 and RB1 mutations, as well as PDL1+ staining and T cell-inflamed scores (Table). High gene expression for ROR2 (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56-0.78, p < .001) and FZD2 (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.89, p < .001) was associated with worse OS compared to low gene expression. No significant difference in OS was observed for WNT5A (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.15, p < .76) and ROR1 (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.01, p < .068). Conclusions: Distinct genomic and immune landscapes for the four investigated WNT pathway components were observed and should be leveraged to identify combination therapies that complement the current pipeline of WNT pathway-targeting drugs. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chadi Nabhan
- Caris life sciences and the University of South Carolina, Deerfield, IL
| | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Talukder R, Makrakis D, Lin GI, Diamantopoulos LN, Dawsey S, Gupta S, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, de Kouchkovsky I, Jindal T, Koshkin VS, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Vather-Wu N, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Cortellini A, Fulgenzi CAM, Pinato DJ, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Gupta K, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Lu E, Kumar V, Lorenzo GD, Joshi M, Isaacsson-Velho P, Buznego LA, Duran I, Moses M, Barata P, Sonpavde G, Wright JL, Yu EY, Montgomery RB, Hsieh AC, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Association of the Time to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Initiation and Outcomes With Second Line ICI in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:558-567. [PMID: 36155169 PMCID: PMC10233855 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early progression on first-line (1L) platinum-based therapy or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but its prognostic role regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response and survival is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of second-line (2L) ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study in patients with aUC treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, who received 2L ICI. Patients receiving switch maintenance ICI were excluded. We defined time to 2L ICI therapy as the time between the start of 1L platinum-based chemotherapy to the start of 2L ICI and categorized patients a priori into 1 of 3 groups: less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months. We calculated overall response rate (ORR) with 2L ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of 2L ICI. ORR was compared among the 3 groups using multivariable logistic regression, and PFS, OS using cox regression. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS We included 215, 215, and 219 patients in the ORR, PFS, and OS analyses, respectively, after exclusions. ORR difference did not reach statistical significance between patients with less than 3 months versus 3-6 months versus more than 6 months to 2L ICI. However, PFS (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.02-2.63) and OS (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.10-2.84) was shorter among those with time to 2L ICI less than 3 months compared to those who initiated 2L ICI more than 6 months. CONCLUSION Among patients with aUC treated with 2L ICI, time to 2L ICI less than 3 months was associated with lower, but not significantly different ORR, but shorter PFS and OS compared to 2L ICI more than 6 months. This highlights potential cross resistance mechanisms between ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Scott Dawsey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan de Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tanya Jindal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joseph J Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Christopher J Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kavita Gupta
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Alex Sankin
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb; School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Eric Lu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
| | - Pedro Isaacsson-Velho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Division of Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan L Wright
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Robert Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew C Hsieh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Diamantopoulos LN, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, De Kouchkovsky I, Koshkin VS, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Santos VS, Agarwal N, Jain J, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Grant M, Lythgoe MP, Pinato DJ, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Shreck E, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Kumar V, Di Lorenzo G, Joshi M, Isaacsson-Velho P, Buznego LA, Duran I, Moses M, Barata P, Sonpavde G, Yu EY, Wright JL, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Association of prior local therapy and outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 inhibitors in advanced urothelial cancer. BJU Int 2022; 130:592-603. [PMID: 34597472 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare clinical outcomes with programmed-death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have vs have not undergone radical surgery (RS) or radiation therapy (RT) prior to developing metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs across 25 institutions. We compared outcomes (observed response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS]) between patients with vs without prior RS, and by type of prior locoregional treatment (RS vs RT vs no locoregional treatment). Patients with de novo advanced disease were excluded. Analysis was stratified by treatment line (first-line and second-line or greater [second-plus line]). Logistic regression was used to compare ORR, while Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used for PFS and OS. Multivariable models were adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS We included 562 patients (first-line: 342 and second-plus line: 220). There was no difference in outcomes based on prior locoregional treatment among those treated with first-line ICIs. In the second-plus-line setting, prior RS was associated with higher ORR (adjusted odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.19-5.74]), longer OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.88) and PFS (aHR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45-0.89) vs no prior RS. This association remained significant when type of prior locoregional treatment (RS and RT) was modelled separately. CONCLUSION Prior RS before developing advanced disease was associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC treated with ICIs in the second-plus-line but not in the first-line setting. While further validation is needed, our findings could have implications for prognostic estimates in clinical discussions and benchmarking for clinical trials. Limitations include the study's retrospective nature, lack of randomization, and possible selection and confounding biases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan De Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph J Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Victor S Santos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jayanshu Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Michael Grant
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark P Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Christopher J Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan Shreck
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Alex Sankin
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.,School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Pedro Isaacsson-Velho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Division of Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Qiao EM, Guram K, Kotha NV, Voora RS, Qian AS, Ahn GS, Kalavacherla S, Pindus R, Banegas MP, Stewart TF, Johnson ML, Murphy JD, Rose BS. Association Between Primary Care Use Prior to Cancer Diagnosis and Subsequent Cancer Mortality in the Veterans Affairs Health System. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2242048. [PMID: 36374497 PMCID: PMC9664263 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Primary care physicians (PCPs) are significant contributors of early cancer detection, yet few studies have investigated whether consistent primary care translates to improved downstream outcomes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of prediagnostic primary care use with metastatic disease at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used databases with primary care and referral linkage from multiple Veterans' Affairs centers from 2004 to 2017 and had a 68-month median follow-up. Analysis was completed between July 2021 and September 2022. Participants included veterans older than 39 years who had been diagnosed with 1 of 12 cancers. Inclusion criteria included known clinical staging, survival follow-up, cause of death, and receiving care at the Veterans Affairs health system (VA). EXPOSURES Prediagnostic PCP use, measured in the 5 years prior to diagnosis. PCP visits were binned into none (0 visits), some (1-4 visits), and annual (5 visits). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Metastatic disease at diagnosis, cancer-specific mortality (CSM) for entire cohort and stratified by tumor subtype. RESULTS Among 245 425 patients representing 12 tumor subtypes, mean age was 65.8 (9.3) years, and the cohort skewed male (97.6%), and White (76.1%), with higher levels of comorbidity (58.6% with Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ≥2). Compared with no prior visit, some PCP use was associated with 26% decreased odds of metastatic disease at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.76; P < .001) and 12% reduced risk of CSM (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89; P < .001). Annual PCP use was associated with 39% decreased odds of metastatic disease (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.59-0.63; P < .001) and 21% reduced risk of CSM (SHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.81; P < .001). Among tumor subtypes, prostate cancer had the largest effect size for prior PCP use on metastatic disease at diagnosis (OR for annual use, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30-0.35; P < .001) and CSM (SHRfor annual use, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.48-0.55; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, increased primary care use before cancer diagnosis was associated with significant decreases in metastatic disease at diagnosis and cancer-related death, with potentially the greatest difference from annual use. PCPs play a vital role in cancer prevention, and additional resources should be allocated to assist these physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund M. Qiao
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Kripa Guram
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Rohith S. Voora
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Alexander S. Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Grace S. Ahn
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Sandhya Kalavacherla
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Ramona Pindus
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Matthew P. Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Tyler F. Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Michelle L. Johnson
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - James D. Murphy
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | - Brent S. Rose
- VA San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Lin GI, Diamantopoulos LN, Dawsey S, Gupta S, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, de Kouchkovsky I, Koshkin VS, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Tripathi N, Agarwal N, Vather-Wu N, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Cortellini A, Fulgenzi CAM, Pinato DJ, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Gupta K, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Lu E, Kumar V, Lorenzo GD, Joshi M, Isaacsson-Velho P, Buznego LA, Duran I, Moses M, Jang A, Barata P, Sonpavde G, Yu EY, Montgomery RB, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Association Between Sites of Metastasis and Outcomes With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:e440-e452. [PMID: 35778337 PMCID: PMC10257151 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sites of metastasis have prognostic significance in advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but more information is needed regarding outcomes based on metastatic sites in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesized that presence of liver/bone metastases would be associated with worse outcomes with ICI. METHODS We identified a retrospective cohort of patients with aUC across 26 institutions, collecting demographics, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcomes information. Outcomes were compared with logistic (observed response rate; ORR) and Cox (progression-free survival; PFS, overall survival; OS) regression between patients with/without metastasis beyond lymph nodes (LN) and those with/without bone/liver/lung metastasis. Analysis was stratified by 1st or 2nd+ line. RESULTS We identified 917 ICI-treated patients: in the 1st line, bone/liver metastases were associated with shorter PFS (Hazard ratio; HR: 1.65 and 2.54), OS (HR: 1.60 and 2.35, respectively) and lower ORR (OR: 0.48 and 0.31). In the 2nd+ line, bone/liver metastases were associated with shorter PFS (HR: 1.71 and 1.62), OS (HR: 1.76 and 1.56) and, for bone-only metastases, lower ORR (OR: 0.29). In the 1st line, LN-confined metastasis was associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.53), OS (HR:0.49) and higher ORR (OR: 2.97). In the 2nd+ line, LN-confined metastasis was associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.47), OS (HR: 0.54), and higher ORR (OR: 2.79); all associations were significant. CONCLUSION Bone and/or liver metastases were associated with worse, while LN-confined metastases were associated with better outcomes in patients with aUC receiving ICI. These findings in a large population treated outside clinical trials corroborate data from trial subset analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Scott Dawsey
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan de Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joseph J Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nishita Tripathi
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | | | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Christopher J Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Kavita Gupta
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Alex Sankin
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb; School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Eric Lu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
| | - Pedro Isaacsson-Velho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Division of Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Albert Jang
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Robert Bruce Montgomery
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Qiao EM, Guram K, Kotha NV, Voora RS, Qian A, Ahn GS, Kalavacherla S, Pindus R, Stewart TF, Banegas MP, Murphy JD, Rose BS. Increasing primary care utilization prior to cancer diagnosis in association with cancer mortality. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.10548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10548 Background: Primary care physicians (PCPs) are significant contributors of early cancer detection yet few studies have investigated whether consistent primary care translates to improved downstream outcomes. We evaluated the impact of prior PCP utilization on metastatic disease at diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) for a general cancer cohort and 12 tumor subtypes. Methods: We identified cancer patients ≥40 years, diagnosed from 2004-2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. For our 5-year pre-diagnostic period, we binned PCP visits into none (0 visits), some (1-4), and annual (5). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the effect of PCP utilization on metastatic disease at diagnosis and Fine-Gray regression with non-cancer death as a competing event evaluated their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM). These were repeated for each subtype. Results: Among 245,425 patients, mean age was 66 years with 5.7-year median follow-up. Compared with 0 visits, some PCP utilization was associated with 26% reduced odds of metastatic disease at diagnosis (odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74 [0.71-0.76] P<0.01) and 12% lower risk of CSM (hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI: 0.88 [0.86-0.89] P<0.01). Annual PCP utilization was associated with 39% reduced odds of metastatic disease (OR, 95% CI: 0.61 [0.59-0.63] P<0.01) and 21% lower risk of CSM (HR, 95% CI: 0.79 [0.77-0.81] P<0.01). Among subtypes, prostate cancer had the largest effect size for PCP utilization on metastatic disease at diagnosis (ORannual, 95% CI: 0.32 [0.30-0.35] P<0.01) and CSM (HRannual, 95% CI: 0.51 [0.48-0.55] P<0.01). Pancreas cancer had the lowest effect size on metastatic disease at diagnosis (ORannual, 95% CI: 0.87 [0.73-1.04] P: 0.12) and CSM (HRannual, 95% CI: 0.89 [0.82-0.97] P<0.01). The table displays additional subtypes. Conclusions: Increased PCP utilization prior to cancer diagnosis is associated with a significant decrease in metastatic disease at diagnosis and CSM, with annual utilization associated with the greatest decrease. These results are consistent when stratifying by tumor subtype. Consistent primary care must be emphasized for patients at risk of cancer. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Men Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Kripa Guram
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Alexander Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Sandhya Kalavacherla
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ramona Pindus
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | - James Don Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stewart TF, Dosset M, Brodskiy P, Xiu J, Rezazadeh A, Mar N, Darabi S, Demeure MJ, Barata PC, Geynisman DM, Ghatalia P, Joshi M, Ramamurthy C, Nabhan C, Heath EI, Carter H, Zanetti M, McKay RR. Landscape analysis of urothelial carcinoma (UC) by telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT) alterations. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.4524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4524 Background: TERT is a catalytic subunit of telomerase, the unique enzyme that confers immortality to cells and is expressed in >90% of cancer cells. Mutations in the TERT promoter region (pTERTmut) are the most prevalent noncoding mutations in cancer. Recent data suggest pTERTmut are associated with improved outcomes in patients with UC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We evaluated the molecular and immune landscape of UC with and without pTERTmut. Methods: UC tissue samples were analyzed for DNA alterations (NextSeq, 592 Genes; NovaSeq, WES) and mRNA expression (NovaSeq, WTS). Immune cell fraction was calculated by QuantiSeq (Finotello 2019, Genome Medicine). PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). MSI/MMR was tested by fragment analysis, IHC and NGS. TMB-H was based on a cut-off of > 10 mut/MB. We compared alterations between samples with and without detected pathogenic pTERTmut. Significance was determined by Mann–Whitney U, X2, and Fischer-Exact and p adjusted for multiple comparisons (q) was < 0.05 using Benjamini-Hochberg. Results: Overall, 1686 UC samples were analyzed, 1166 from primary lesions and 499 from a lymph node or metastatic site. pTERTmut was present in 68% of primary and 61% of metastatic tumors, and correlated with modest increase of TERT expression (1.18 fold, p=0.015). pTERTmut was associated with less frequent alterations in TP53, KMT2D, CCND1, MYC, KEAP1 and less MSI/dMMR. By contrast, pTERTmut was associated with more frequent alterations in ARID1A, TSC1, PIK3CA and TMB-H (all q<0.05). Over 41% of pTERTmut were TMB-H. TERTp mutations were not associated with FGFR alterations. The frequency of co-occurring mutations was similar by specimen site. In evaluating the immune landscape (Table), pTERTmut was associated with higher expression of PD-L1 (IHC, mRNA), PD-L2 (mRNA) and TIM3 (mRNA) in tumors from primary sites (all p and q<0.05), but not in metastatic sites. Investigation of tumor-associated immune cells demonstrated that pTERTmut correlated with higher percentage of M1-macrophages and CD8+ T cells in primary tumors, and was inversely-correlated with NK cells in metastatic sites (all q<0.05). Conclusions: This is the largest analysis looking at the molecular and immune landscape of pTERTmut UC tumors. We observed differential patterns of DNA alterations and tumor immune microenvironment based on pTERTmut status. Further work is needed to understand differences in these molecular cohorts and the association of these data with clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael J. Demeure
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Chethan Ramamurthy
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Elisabeth I. Heath
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | - Rana R. McKay
- University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chiang AC, Austin M, Stewart TF, Arammash M, Bhatt S, Gettinger SN, Goldberg SB, Wilson FH, Newton BR, Cohenuram MK, Sabbath KD, Talsania AD, Russo AV, Herbst RS, Schalper KA. A pilot study of ipilimumab and nivolumab in recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.8583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8583 Background: Immunotherapy has shown efficacy in the treatment of recurrent, extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). In the Checkmate 032 trial, ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy resulted in a 21% objective response rate in relapsed SCLC. At present, there are no biomarkers used in clinical practice to predict treatment responsiveness in SCLC. Ipilimumab and nivolumab act by blocking key co-inhibitory immune pathways of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1, respectively, leading to reinvigoration of anti-tumor cytotoxic T cell responses and a decrease in immune suppressive tumor infiltrating leukocytes. The ratio of intratumor Teff (CD8+) cells to Treg (CD4+/Foxp3+) cells (Teff/Treg) could be a more reliable biomarker than effector cell infiltration alone. Methods: In this open-label, single arm trial, we enrolled patients with ES-SCLC who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy; prior anti-PD-1 /PD-L1 therapy was allowed. Patients were treated with nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, for a total of 4 doses each and received nivolumab 480 mg beginning with cycle 5, every 4 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity or study discontinuation. On-study biopsies were performed prior to initiation of therapy and during week 4 for the biomarker primary objective—to correlate disease response with intratumor Teff/Treg changes. Secondary objectives include determining ORR, DOR, PFS, and OS. Results: Twenty-two patients (median age 63.5 [range 54-80] years, ECOG 0/1/2 [41%/50%/9%], sex M/F [45%/55%]) were enrolled and received treatment. Fourteen (64%) had paired biopsies while on treatment. Fifteen patients were evaluable per RECIST with an ORR of 13% (2/15, 2 partial responses [13%]) and DCR was 40% (6/15, 4 stable disease [27%]). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 9/22 [40%]. Grade 4 TRAEs occurred in 2/22 [9%] (elevated lipase and elevated bilirubin) and Grade 5 TRAEs occurred in 1/22 patients (hepatic failure). Out of the 9 patients previously treated with anti- PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, 1 had a partial response and 2 had stable disease. Multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence analysis revealed changes of both CD8+ effector T cells and Tregs in the tumor micro-environment associated with clinical benefit to immunotherapy. Conclusions: Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab shows clinical efficacy in relapsed extensive-stage SCLC, including those previously treated with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 therapy. Obtaining paired biopsies was shown to be successful in this prospective trial to study the tumor microenvironment in SCLC tumors treated with checkpoint inhibitors. Early biomarker evaluation during week 4 shows local immunomodulatory effect of treatment and supports exploration as predictive biomarker in this population. Clinical trial information: 03670056.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Scott N. Gettinger
- Yale School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kotha NV, Kumar A, Nelson TJ, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Voora RS, McKay RR, Rose BS, Stewart TF. Outcomes by time to definitive chemoradiation treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:274.e1-274.e6. [PMID: 35216893 PMCID: PMC8863428 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has raised concerns about delaying treatment for localized cancer and its impact on long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate the impact of time to chemoradiation (CRT) on recurrence and survival outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS In the national Veterans Affairs' database, we identified patients with urothelial histology, MIBC (T2-4a/N0-3/M0) diagnosed between 2000 to 2018 and treated with definitive CRT. Time to treatment was defined as the number of days between date of diagnosis and start date of CRT. The cohort was stratified into < 90 (early) or ≥ 90 days (delayed) groups. Endpoints of locoregional failure (LRF), distant failure (DF), overall survival (OS), and bladder cancer-specific survival (BCS) were evaluated in multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray models. RESULTS 305 patients with MIBC underwent CRT - 190 (62.3%) received early CRT, 115 (37.7%) received delayed CRT. Multivariable analysis (including success of transurethral resection of bladder tumor and type of chemotherapy) revealed no difference in recurrence between groups - LRF HR 1.12 (95%CI 0.76-1.67, P = 0.56) and DF HR 1.03 (95%CI 0.70-1.53, P = 0.88). Similarly, there were no differences in survival outcomes. The lack of association was maintained at both earlier and later time cutoffs (60-120 days). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that a short-term delay in definitive therapy may not affect long-term outcomes for patients with MIBC undergoing CRT. This study does not endorse delays in therapy, but rather provides information to aid patients and clinicians navigate the unique challenges of MIBC care in both pandemic and non-pandemic times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Tyler J. Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Edmund M. Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Alex S. Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Rohith S. Voora
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Tyler F. Stewart
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA,Corresponding author: Ph: 858-822-6185, Fax: 858-249-0905
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Javier-DesLoges J, Nelson TJ, Murphy JD, McKay RR, Stewart TF, Kader AK, Derweesh I, Martinez ME, Rose BS. An evaluation of trends in the representation of patients by age, sex, and diverse race/ethnic groups in bladder and kidney cancer clinical trials. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:199.e15-199.e21. [PMID: 35431133 PMCID: PMC10441556 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the representation of women, minorities, and the elderly groups in clinical trials and whether participation has changed over time. METHODS Retrospective study in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Clinical Data Update System and Center for Disease Control and Prevention United States Cancer Statistics 2000 to 2019. We compared cancer incidence proportion to proportion of patients enrolled in an NCI trial when stratified by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We performed multivariable analysis to determine the odds of participating in a clinical trial in 2015 to 2019 when compared to 2000 to 2004. RESULTS This study included 14,094 patients, 12,169 (86.3%) non-Hispanic White patients, 662 (4.7%) Black patients, and 660 (4.7%) Hispanic patients. There were 3,701 (26.3%) female patients and 10,393 (73.7%) male patients. For bladder cancer clinical trials, Black patients and Hispanic patients were underrepresented in clinical trials compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.88, P = 0.002) and (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.54-0.88, P = 0.003), respectively. For kidney cancer trials, Black and Hispanic patients were underrepresented in clinical trials compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (OR 0.42, OR 0.33-0.54, P < 0.001) and (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55-0.83, P < 0.001), respectively. Women were underrepresented in kidney cancer trials compared to men (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89) and similarly for bladder cancer trials (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.81, P < 0.001). For bladder cancer trials, the participation of Black patients over time (OR 1.04, P = 0.814) and female patients over time (OR 1.03, P = 0.741) were unchanged. For kidney cancer trials, the participation of Black patients over time (OR 1.17, P = 0.293) and female patients over time (OR 1.03, P = 0.663) participation was also unchanged. CONCLUSION In this study of clinical trials in bladder and kidney cancer, we identified that Blacks, Hispanics, and females were underrepresented. Additionally, Black and female participation was unchanged over the span of 20 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Javier-DesLoges
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - A Karim Kader
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ithaar Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Science, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Talukder R, Makrakis D, Diamantopoulos LN, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, De Kouchkovsky I, Koshkin VS, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Santos VS, Agarwal N, Jain J, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Grant M, Lythgoe MP, Pinato DJ, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Shreck E, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Kumar V, Di Lorenzo G, Joshi M, Velho PI, Buznego LA, Duran I, Moses M, Barata P, Sonpavde G, Yu EY, Wright JL, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Response and Outcomes to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Urothelial Cancer Based on Prior Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:165-175. [PMID: 35078711 PMCID: PMC8995351 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC), but response rates can be modest. We compared outcomes between patients with and without prior intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), who received ICI for aUC, hypothesizing that prior intravesical BCG would be associated with worse outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study across 25 institutions in US and Europe. We compared observed response rate (ORR) using logistic regression; progression-free survival (PFS) and OS using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Analyses were stratified by treatment line (first line/salvage) and included multivariable models adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS A total of 1026 patients with aUC were identified; 614, 617, and 638 were included in ORR, OS, PFS analyses, respectively. Overall, 150 pts had history of prior intravesical BCG treatment. ORR to ICI was similar between those with and without prior intravesical BCG exposure in both first line and salvage settings (adjusted odds radios 0.55 [P= .08] and 1.65 [P= .12]). OS (adjusted hazard ratios 1.05 [P= .79] and 1.13 [P= .49]) and PFS (adjusted hazard ratios 1.12 [P= .55] and 0.87 [P= .39]) were similar between those with and without intravesical BCG exposure in first line and salvage settings. CONCLUSION Prior intravesical BCG was not associated with differences in response and survival in patients with aUC treated with ICI. Limitations include retrospective nature, lack of randomization, presence of selection and confounding biases. This study provides important preliminary data that prior intravesical BCG exposure may not impact ICI efficacy in aUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafee Talukder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Dimitrios Makrakis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan De Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vadim S. Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joseph J. Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Tyler F. Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Victor S. Santos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Jayanshu Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’ Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E. Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Michael Grant
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark P. Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J. Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Christopher J. Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH.,Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Evan Shreck
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Benjamin A. Gartrell
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Alex Sankin
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
| | | | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evan Y. Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Jonathan L. Wright
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.,Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nelson TJ, Courtney PT, Klebaner D, Guram K, Sherer MV, Rodrigues De Moraes G, Banegas MP, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Garraway I, Murphy J, Rose BS. Association between health-care system and prostate cancer mortality for African American men with localized and metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
27 Background: African American (AA) men with prostate cancer (PC) present with more advanced disease and have worse survival than comparable non-Hispanic White (White) men. Recent studies suggest that receiving care within an equal access setting may attenuate these disparities. We hypothesize that AA men receiving care within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) will have improved outcomes compared to AA men receiving care in the general population as assessed by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: We identified AA men diagnosed with PC between 2004 and 2015 in the VHA and SEER. For comparisons of covariate distributions across subgroups, we used the chi-squared test with continuity correction. We analyzed the cumulative incidence (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) of PC specific mortality (PCSM) in the VHA and SEER. Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for demographic information were performed. Results: The cohort included 85,409 AA men (VHA: 27,415, SEER: 57,994). Median follow-up was 4.79 years in the VHA and 5.16 years in SEER. In the VHA, AA men were more likely to present with localized disease (VHA 94.7% vs SEER 86.4%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have metastatic disease (3.2% vs 4.3%, p < 0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was lower for patients in the VHA (VHA: 3.8% [CI: 3.5-4.1%] vs. SEER: 5.0% [CI: 4.8-5.2%], p < 0.001). The PCSM difference was largest in men with metastatic disease. In metastatic patients, cumulative incidence of PCSM at five years was significantly lower in the VHA (VHA 52.5% [CI: 48.0-56.5%] vs. SEER 64.8% [CI: 62.3-67.1%], p < 0.001). In contrast, AA men with localized disease had similar PCSM in the VHA and SEER (VHA 2.4% [CI: 2.2-2.6%] vs. SEER 2.6% [CI: 2.4-2.7%], p = 0.09 at five years). On multivariable analysis, VHA system was associated with lower PCSM [Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.91, p < 0.001]. There was a significant interaction between VHA system and distant metastases at diagnosis [p < 0.001] indicating larger differences in PCSM by healthcare system in metastatic patients as compared to localized patients. VHA system was associated with reduced PCSM in metastatic patients [HR 0.84, p < 0.001] but not in localized patients [HR 0.96, p = 0.13]. Conclusions: AA men in the VHA had a significantly lower incidence of PCSM than those in the SEER database, especially for those who presented with distant metastases at diagnosis. Future work should examine how cost and access to care affect disparities in outcomes for AA men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniella Klebaner
- University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, La Jolla, CA
| | - Kripa Guram
- VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - Michael Vincent Sherer
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Isla Garraway
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kumar A, Kotha NV, Nelson TJ, Cherry DR, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Rose BS. Impact of selection bias on outcomes in veterans with muscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving bladder preserving trimodality therapy. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
462 Background: Retrospective studies using large registries comparing outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to trimodality therapy (TMT), which includes transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by chemoradiation, often cannot distinguish whether patients receiving TMT were eligible for cystectomy but declined or simply ineligible for cystectomy. The objective of this study was to compare survival outcomes of patients with MIBC receiving TMT stratified by whether they were cystectomy-eligible to patients receiving RC +/- NAC. Methods: We used the national Veterans Affairs’ (VA) database to identify patients diagnosed between 2000-2017 with urothelial histology, MIBC (T2-4a/N0-3/M0) who underwent RC or TMT. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was evaluated with multivariable Fine-Gray regression. We conducted a chart review of clinical notes to ascertain if patients were eligible for cystectomy. Results: Overall 2306 Veterans with MIBC were included: 1472 (64%) with RC without NAC, 506 (22%) with RC-NAC, 107 (4.6%) with TMT eligible for RC, and 221 (9.4%) with TMT ineligible for RC. Median follow up time was 4.7 years. Patients receiving RC were on average 10 years younger, had higher creatinine clearance, and fewer comorbidities than those receiving TMT. Cystectomy-eligible TMT patients had higher creatinine clearance and fewer comorbidities than those ineligible for cystectomy. On multivariable analysis, compared to RC-NAC, TMT in cystectomy-eligible patients was associated with similar OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 - 1.28; p = 0.93) and BCSM (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.71-1.47; p = 0.91). Compared to RC-NAC, TMT in cystectomy-ineligible patients was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.13 - 1.71; p = 0.002) and BCSM (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.23 - 2.10; p < 0.001). Conclusions: There is a significant selection bias among patients with MIBC receiving TMT. Cystectomy-eligible patients receiving TMT likely have similar survival outcomes as those receiving RC. Comparisons between RC and TMT in large registry data that lack information regarding eligibility for cystectomy in the TMT arm may be unreliable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Makrakis D, Talukder R, Dawsey S, Carril L, Stewart TF, Morales-Barrera R, Park JJ, Fulgenzi CAM, Murgic J, Vather-Wu N, de Kouchkovsky I, Devitt ME, Di Lorenzo G, Gupta K, Tripathi N, Zakopoulou R, Tripathi A, Lu E, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Association of time to second-line (2L) immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and outcomes with ICIs in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
505 Background: Current standard therapy for most pts with aUC is first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy followed by ICI maintenance (or 2L if progression). Shorter time on 1L or between therapy lines may be a surrogate of more aggressive disease and poor outcome, but its prognostic role in ICI response is unclear. We hypothesized that shorter time until start of 2L ICI would be associated with worse outcomes in aUC. Methods: We performed a retrospective multi-institution cohort study in pts with aUC treated with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy, who later received 2L ICI. Pts receiving maintenance ICI were excluded. We calculated the time from start of 1L platinum chemotherapy to start of 2L ICI, dichotomizing the exposure into ≤6 months and >6 months. We compared overall response rate (ORR) to 2L ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the start of 2L ICI between the two populations. ORR was compared among groups using multivariable logistic regression and PFS, OS using cox regression. Analysis was adjusted for calculated Bellmunt score. Results: From a total of 1283 pts, 462 received 1L platinum chemotherapy; among those, 350 received 2L ICI. After exclusions, 270, 269 and 260 pts were included in the ORR, PFS and OS analyses, respectively. Median age was 70 years, 78% men, 75% White, 74% with pure urothelial histology, 21% upper tract, 60% received cisplatin in 1L. Pts with time to 2L ICI ≤6 months had significantly higher Bellmunt scores (32% vs 22% score=2, 9% vs 3% score=3). ORR and PFS were comparable between pts with ≤ and >6 months to 2L ICI. However, OS was significantly longer for pts with >6 months to 2L ICI (median [m]OS 13 vs 7 months, p=0.002), (Table). Conclusions: Among pts with aUC treated with 2L ICI, time to 2L ICI ≤6 months from 1L platinum based chemotherapy was associated with similar ORR and PFS but shorter OS. Limitations include retrospective nature, patient selection, confounding factors. More studies are needed on the impact of platinum resistance in pts with aUC treated with ICIs.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Scott Dawsey
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lucia Carril
- Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joseph J. Park
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Jure Murgic
- Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ivan de Kouchkovsky
- University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Edward Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Kavita Gupta
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Eric Lu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Courtney PT, Deka R, Kotha NV, Cherry DR, Salans MA, Nelson TJ, Kumar A, Luterstein E, Yip AT, Nalawade V, Parsons JK, Kader AK, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Metastasis and Mortality in Men With Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:151-159. [PMID: 35130495 PMCID: PMC10399925 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is a safe treatment option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer. However, the safety of AS for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified men with NCCN-classified low-risk and favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration. We analyzed progression to definitive treatment, metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks regression. RESULTS The cohort included 9,733 men, of whom 1,007 (10.3%) had intermediate-risk disease (773 [76.8%] favorable, 234 [23.2%] unfavorable), followed for a median of 7.6 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of metastasis was significantly higher for patients with favorable (9.6%; 95% CI, 7.1%-12.5%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (19.2%; 95% CI, 13.4%-25.9%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-1.9%). The 10-year cumulative incidence of PCSM was also significantly higher for patients with favorable (3.7%; 95% CI, 2.3%-5.7%; P<.001) and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (11.8%; 95% CI, 6.8%-18.4%; P<.001) than for those with low-risk disease (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.4%). In multivariable competing-risks regression, favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk patients had significantly increased risks of metastasis and PCSM compared with low-risk patients (all P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with low-risk patients, those with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with AS are at increased risk of metastasis and PCSM. AS may be an appropriate option for carefully selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, though identification of appropriate candidates and AS protocols should be tested in future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Rishi Deka
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Daniel R Cherry
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Mia A Salans
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | - Anthony T Yip
- 2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| | | | - J Kellogg Parsons
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,3Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego.,4Janssen Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LCC; and
| | - A Karim Kader
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,3Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,4Janssen Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, LCC; and
| | - Brent S Rose
- 1Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, and.,2Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kotha NV, Kumar A, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Voora RS, Nalawade V, Karim Kader A, McKay RR, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Association of Health-Care System and Survival in African American and Non-Hispanic White Patients With Bladder Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:600-608. [PMID: 34918091 PMCID: PMC9002275 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND African American patients with bladder cancer have inferior outcomes compared with non-Hispanic White (White) patients. We hypothesize that access to health care is a primary determinant of this disparity. We compared outcomes by race for patients with bladder cancer receiving care within the predominant hybrid-payer health-care model of the United States captured in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with those receiving care within the equal-access model of the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA). METHODS African American and White patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were identified in SEER and VHA. Stage at presentation, bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCM), and overall survival (OS) were compared by race within each health-care system. RESULTS The SEER cohort included 122 449 patients (93.7% White, 6.3% African American). The VHA cohort included 36 322 patients (91.0% White, 9.0% African American). In both cohorts, African American patients were more likely to present with muscle-invasive disease and metastases, but the differences between races were statistically significantly smaller in VHA. In SEER multivariable models, African American patients had worse BCM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.29) and OS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.31). In contrast within the VHA, African American patients had similar BCM (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.07) and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS In this study of contrasting health-care models, receiving medical care in an equal-access system was associated with reduced differences in stage at presentation and eliminated disparities in survival outcomes for African American patients with bladder cancer. Our findings highlight the importance of reducing financial barriers to care to notably improve health equity and oncologic outcomes for African American patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V Kotha
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Edmund M Qiao
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alex S Qian
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - A Karim Kader
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Correspondence to: Brent S. Rose, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, 9452 Medical Center Dr, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Qiao EM, Lynch JA, Lee KM, Kotha NV, Nalawade V, Voora RS, Qian AS, Nelson TJ, Yamoah K, Garraway IP, Stewart TF, Parsons JK, Rose BS. Evaluating Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Young African American Men With Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:592-599. [PMID: 34893859 PMCID: PMC9002290 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite higher risks associated with prostate cancer, young African American men are poorly represented in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) trials, which limits proper evidence-based guidance. We evaluated the impact of PSA screening, alongside primary care provider utilization, on prostate cancer outcomes for these patients. METHODS We identified African American men aged 40-55 years, diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity scores were used in multivariable models to assess PSA screening on PSA levels higher than 20, Gleason score of 8 or higher, and metastatic disease at diagnosis. Lead-time adjusted Fine-Gray regression evaluated PSA screening on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), with noncancer death as competing events. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS The cohort included 4726 patients. Mean age was 51.8 years, with 84-month median follow-up. There were 1057 (22.4%) with no PSA screening prior to diagnosis. Compared with no screening, PSA screening was associated with statistically significantly reduced odds of PSA levels higher than 20 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.49 to 0.63; P < .001), Gleason score of 8 or higher (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.88; P < .001), and metastatic disease at diagnosis (OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.39 to 0.64; P < .001), and decreased PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36 to 0.76; P < .001). Primary care provider visits displayed similar effects. CONCLUSIONS Among young African American men diagnosed with prostate cancer, PSA screening was associated with statistically significantly lower risk of PSA levels higher than 20, Gleason score of 8 or higher, and metastatic disease at diagnosis and statistically significantly reduced risk of PCSM. However, the retrospective design limits precise estimation of screening effects. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund M Qiao
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Julie A Lynch
- Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kyung M Lee
- Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Alexander S Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Isla P Garraway
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - J Kellogg Parsons
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Correspondence to: Brent S. Rose, MD, Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, 3960 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0865, USA (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kotha NV, Kumar A, Nelson TJ, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Voora RS, McKay RR, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Treatment Discontinuation in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 7:100836. [PMID: 35071834 PMCID: PMC8767252 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiation (CRT) is a definitive treatment option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite its effectiveness, CRT is underused, in part owing to concerns of tolerability and the need for integrated multidisciplinary care. We investigated factors associated with and the impact of treatment discontinuation in patients with MIBC treated with CRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS In the US Veterans Affairs' national database, we identified patients with urothelial histology, MIBC (T2-4a/N0-3/M0) diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 and treated with definitive-intent CRT. The primary endpoint of discontinued radiation was evaluated in a multivariable logistic regression. Secondary endpoints of 30-day and 90-day mortality, overall mortality, and nonbladder cancer mortality were evaluated in multivariable models. RESULTS Of 369 veterans with MIBC who underwent CRT, 30 patients (8.1%) did not complete radiation. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation included comorbidities or infections necessitating hospital admission (63.3%) and treatment intolerance or declining performance status (26.7%). In multivariable logistic regression, variables associated with radiation discontinuation were creatinine clearance ≤ 50 (odds ratio [OR], 3.93; 95% CI, 1.63-9.50; P = .002), incomplete transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.15-8.63; P = .02), and nonpreferred chemotherapy (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.31-8.36; P = .01). In the cohort that discontinued radiation, 30-day mortality was 33.3% and 90-day mortality was 50.0%, with the majority of deaths attributed to nonbladder cancer causes. No patient or tumor variables were associated with either endpoint. In the cohort that completed radiation, 30-day mortality was 2.7% and 90-day mortality was 6.8%. In multivariable analysis, radiation discontinuation was associated with worse overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.48; 95% CI, 1.36-4.50; P = .003) and worse nonbladder cancer mortality (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.24-4.34; P = .008). CONCLUSIONS With a low rate of treatment discontinuation, CRT is an effective and feasible treatment option for the typically elderly and comorbid population of patients with MIBC. In addition to identified predictors of treatment discontinuation (poor renal function, incomplete TURBT, etc.), further research is required to develop evidence-based guidelines for optimal patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California,Corresponding author: Nikhil V. Kotha, BS
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tyler J. Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Edmund M. Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Alex S. Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Rohith S. Voora
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Rana R. McKay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler F. Stewart
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Brent S. Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kotha NV, Voora RS, Qian AS, Kumar A, Qiao EM, Stewart TF, Rose BS, Orosco RK. Prognostic Utility of Pretreatment Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Advanced Larynx Cancer. Biomark Insights 2021; 16:11772719211049848. [PMID: 34658619 PMCID: PMC8512256 DOI: 10.1177/11772719211049848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio has been explored as a prognosticator in several
cancer types, but its association with larynx cancer outcomes is not well
known. We aimed to identify an optimal NLR cutoff point and examine the
prognostic utility of this biomarker in patients with locoregionally
advanced larynx cancer treated with curative intent. Methods: In the Veterans Affairs’ (VA) national database, we identified patients with
locoregionally advanced (T3-4N0-3M0) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma
diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 and treated with curative intent. NLR cutoff
points were calculated using Contal/O’Quigley’s method. Outcomes of larynx
cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and non-larynx cancer
survival (NCS) were evaluated in multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray models. Results: In 1047 patients, the optimal pretreatment NLR cutoff was identified as 4.17
- 722 patients with NLR ⩽ 4.17, 325 patients with NLR > 4.17. The
elevated NLR cohort had a higher proportion of T4 disease (39.4% vs 28.4%),
node positive disease (52.3% vs 43.1%), and surgical treatment (43.7% vs
35.2%). In multivariable analysis, NLR > 4.17 was independently
associated with worse OS (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12-1.54,
P = .001) and worse CSS (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17-1.83,
P < .001), but not with NCS (HR 0.94, 95% CI
0.75-1.18, P = .58). Conclusion: In locoregionally advanced larynx cancer treated with curative intent, we
identified elevated NLR to be associated with inferior OS and CSS. Further
prospective studies are needed to investigate pretreatment NLR and our
identified 4.17 cutoff as a potential larynx cancer-specific marker for this
high risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V Kotha
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alex S Qian
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Edmund M Qiao
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Moores Cancer Center at University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Moores Cancer Center at University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ryan K Orosco
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Moores Cancer Center at University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Voora RS, Panuganti BA, Flagg M, Nelson T, Kotha NV, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Kumar A, Stewart TF, Rose B, Califano J, Weissbrod PA, Mell LK, Orosco RK. Patterns of Failure After Definitive Treatment of T4a Larynx Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 167:274-285. [PMID: 34609937 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211049211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recurrence is known to predict laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) survival. Recurrence patterns in T4a LSCC are poorly characterized and represent a possible explanation for observed survival discrepancies by treatment rendered. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective database review. SETTING Veterans Affairs national database. METHODS Patients with T4a LSCC between 2000 and 2017 were identified and stratified by treatment (chemoradiotherapy [CRT] vs total laryngectomy + neck dissection + adjuvant therapy [surgical]). Primary outcomes were locoregional and distant recurrence. Secondary outcomes of overall mortality, larynx cancer mortality, and noncancer mortality were evaluated in Cox and Fine-Gray models. RESULTS A total of 1043 patients had comparable baseline demographics: 438 in the CRT group and 605 in the surgical group. Patients undergoing CRT had higher proportions of node positivity (64.6% vs 53.1%, P < .001). Locoregional and distant recurrence were less common in the surgical group (23.0% vs 37.2%, P < .001; 6.8% vs 13.3%, P < .001, respectively); however, distant metastatic rates did not differ within the N0 subgroup (P = .722). On multivariable regression, surgery demonstrated favorable locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.62; P < .001), distant recurrence (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.31-0.71; P < .001), overall mortality (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64-0.87; P < .001), and larynx cancer mortality (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.85; P < .001). CONCLUSION T4a LSCC survival discrepancies between surgical and nonsurgical treatment are influenced by varying recurrence behaviors. Surgery was associated with superior disease control and improved survival. Beyond the known benefit in locoregional control with surgery, there may be a protective effect on distant recurrence that depends on regional disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohith S Voora
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Bharat A Panuganti
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Mitchell Flagg
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Tyler Nelson
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Edmund M Qiao
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alexander S Qian
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.,Divisions of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Brent Rose
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Joseph Califano
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Philip A Weissbrod
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ryan K Orosco
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Qiao EM, Voora RS, Nalawade V, Kotha NV, Qian AS, Nelson TJ, Durkin M, Vitzthum LK, Murphy JD, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Evaluating the clinical trends and benefits of low-dose computed tomography in lung cancer patients. Cancer Med 2021; 10:7289-7297. [PMID: 34528761 PMCID: PMC8525167 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite guideline recommendations, utilization of low‐dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening remains low. The driving factors behind these low rates and the real‐world effect of LDCT utilization on lung cancer outcomes remain limited. Methods We identified patients diagnosed with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from 2015 to 2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the influence of LDCT screening on stage at diagnosis. Lead time correction using published LDCT lead times was performed. Cancer‐specific mortality (CSM) was evaluated using Fine–Gray regression with non‐cancer death as a competing risk. A lasso machine learning model identified important predictors for receiving LDCT screening. Results Among 4664 patients, mean age was 67.8 with 58‐month median follow‐up, 95% CI = [7–71], and 118 patients received ≥1 screening LDCT before NSCLC diagnosis. From 2015 to 2017, LDCT screening increased (0.1%–6.6%, mean = 1.3%). Compared with no screening, patients with ≥1 LDCT were more than twice as likely to present with stage I disease at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 2.16 [95% CI 1.46–3.20]) and less than half as likely to present with stage IV (OR 0.38 [CI 0.21–0.70]). Screened patients had lower risk of CSM even after adjusting for LDCT lead time (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.60 [CI 0.42–0.85]). The machine learning model achieved an area under curve of 0.87 and identified diagnosis year and region as the most important predictors for receiving LDCT. White, non‐Hispanic patients were more likely to receive LDCT screening, whereas minority, older, female, and unemployed patients were less likely. Conclusions Utilization of LDCT screening is increasing, although remains low. Consistent with randomized data, LDCT‐screened patients were diagnosed at earlier stages and had lower CSM. LDCT availability appeared to be the main predictor of utilization. Providing access to more patients, including those in diverse racial and socioeconomic groups, should be a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund M Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Rohith S Voora
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alexander S Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michael Durkin
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lucas K Vitzthum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.,Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Courtney PT, Deka R, Kotha NV, Cherry DR, Salans MA, Nelson TJ, Kumar A, Luterstein E, Yip AT, Nalawade V, Parsons JK, Kader AK, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer in African American and non-Hispanic White men. Cancer 2021; 127:4403-4412. [PMID: 34347291 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety of active surveillance (AS) for African American men compared with non-Hispanic White (White) men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer is unclear. METHODS The authors identified patients with modified National Comprehensive Cancer Network favorable ("low-intermediate") and unfavorable ("high-intermediate") intermediate-risk prostate cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and initially managed with AS in the Veterans Health Administration database. They analyzed definitive treatment, disease progression, metastases, prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and all-cause mortality by using cumulative incidences and multivariable competing-risks (disease progression, metastasis, and PCSM) or Cox (all-cause mortality) regression. RESULTS The cohort included 1007 men (African Americans, 330 [32.8%]; Whites, 677 [67.2%]) followed for a median of 7.7 years; 773 (76.8%) had low-intermediate-risk disease, and 234 (23.2%) had high-intermediate-risk disease. The 10-year cumulative incidences of definitive treatment were not significantly different (African Americans, 83.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 78.5%-88.7%; Whites, 80.6%; 95% CI, 76.6%-84.4%; P = .17). Among those with low-intermediate-risk disease, there were no significant differences in the 10-year cumulative incidences of disease progression (African Americans, 46.8%; 95% CI, 40.0%-53.3%; Whites, 46.9%; 95% CI, 42.1%-51.5%; P = .91), metastasis (African Americans, 7.1%; 95% CI, 3.7%-11.8%; Whites, 10.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-14.6%; P = .17), or PCSM (African Americans, 3.8%; 95% CI, 1.6%-7.5%; Whites, 3.8%; 95% CI, 2.0%-6.3%; P = .69). In a multivariable regression including the entire cohort, African American race was not associated with increased risks of definitive treatment, disease progression, metastasis, PCSM, or all-cause mortality (all P > .30). CONCLUSIONS Outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Health System were similar for African American and White men treated for low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer with AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Travis Courtney
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Rishi Deka
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Daniel R Cherry
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Mia A Salans
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Elaine Luterstein
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Anthony T Yip
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - J Kellogg Parsons
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - A Karim Kader
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Urology, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Brent S Rose
- Veterans Health Administration San Diego Health Care System, La Jolla, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Esagian SM, Khaki AR, Diamantopoulos LN, Carril-Ajuria L, Castellano D, De Kouchkovsky I, Park JJ, Alva A, Bilen MA, Stewart TF, McKay RR, Santos VS, Agarwal N, Jain J, Zakharia Y, Morales-Barrera R, Devitt ME, Nelson A, Hoimes CJ, Shreck E, Gartrell BA, Sankin A, Tripathi A, Zakopoulou R, Bamias A, Rodriguez-Vida A, Drakaki A, Liu S, Kumar V, Lythgoe MP, Pinato DJ, Murgic J, Fröbe A, Joshi M, Isaacsson Velho P, Hahn N, Alonso Buznego L, Duran I, Moses M, Barata P, Galsky MD, Sonpavde G, Yu EY, Msaouel P, Koshkin VS, Grivas P. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced upper and lower tract urothelial carcinoma: a comparison of outcomes. BJU Int 2021; 128:196-205. [PMID: 33556233 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare clinical outcomes between patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC) in the upper and lower urinary tract receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study collecting clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome data for patients with aUC receiving ICIs from 2013 to 2020 across 24 institutions. We compared the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with upper and lower tract UC (UTUC, LTUC). Uni- and multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of UTUC on ORR, OS, and PFS. Subgroup analyses were performed stratified based on histology (pure, mixed) and line of treatment (first line, subsequent line). RESULTS Out of a total of 746 eligible patients, 707, 717, and 738 were included in the ORR, OS, and PFS analyses, respectively. Our results did not contradict the hypothesis that patients with UTUC and LTUC had similar ORRs (24% vs 28%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.24), OS (median 9.8 vs 9.6 months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.73-1.19), and PFS (median 4.3 vs 4.1 months; aHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.81-1.27). Patients with mixed-histology UTUC had a significantly lower ORR and shorter PFS vs mixed-histology LTUC (aOR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.91 and aHR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06-2.59), respectively). CONCLUSION Overall, patients with UTUC and LTUC receiving ICIs have comparable treatment response and outcomes. Subgroup analyses based on histology showed that those with mixed-histology UTUC had a lower ORR and shorter PFS compared to mixed-histology LTUC. Further studies and evaluation of molecular biomarkers can help refine patient selection for immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stepan M Esagian
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Ali Raza Khaki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Lucia Carril-Ajuria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Castellano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan De Kouchkovsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joseph J Park
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mehmet A Bilen
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Victor S Santos
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jayanshu Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Yousef Zakharia
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael E Devitt
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ariel Nelson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Christopher J Hoimes
- Division of Medical Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center at Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Evan Shreck
- Department of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin A Gartrell
- Department of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Alex Sankin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, ATTIKON University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alexandra Drakaki
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark P Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jure Murgic
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Monika Joshi
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Pedro Isaacsson Velho
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Noah Hahn
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Marcus Moses
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Pedro Barata
- Deming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Genitourinary Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Evan Y Yu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vadim S Koshkin
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kumar A, Cherry DR, Courtney PT, Nalawade V, Kotha N, Riviere PJ, Efstathiou J, McKay RR, Karim Kader A, Rose BS, Stewart TF. Outcomes for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer with Radical Cystectomy or Trimodal Therapy in US Veterans. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 30:1-10. [PMID: 34337540 PMCID: PMC8317783 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains undertreated despite multiple potentially curative options. Both radical cystectomy (RC) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trimodal therapy (TMT), including transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by chemoradiotherapy, are standard treatments. Objective To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of RC with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RC-NAC), RC without NAC, TMT with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline–preferred radiosensitizing chemotherapy including cisplatin or mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil (pTMT), and TMT with nonpreferred chemotherapy (npTMT). Design, setting, and participants US veterans with nonmetastatic MIBC (T2-4aN0-3M0) were studied. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Overall mortality (OM) was evaluated with multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was evaluated with multivariable Fine-Gray regression. Salvage cystectomy rates were obtained by chart review. Results and limitations Overall 2306 patients were included: 1472 (64%) with RC without NAC, 506 (22%) with RC-NAC, 163 (7%) with pTMT, and 165 (7%) with npTMT. On multivariable analysis, pTMT was associated with similar OM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94–1.50; p = 0.15) and BCSM (HR 1.34; 95% CI 0.99–1.83; p = 0.06) to RC-NAC; npTMT was associated with worse OM (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.04–1.61; p = 0.02) and BCSM (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.09–1.94; p = 0.01). RC without NAC was associated with similar OM (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.95–1.24; p = 0.24) and BCSM (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.86–1.21; p = 0.79). When stratified by age, among patients ≥65 yr of age, treatment with pTMT was associated with similar OM (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.87–1.50; p = 0.35) and BCSM (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.76–1.62; p = 0.60). Among patients <65 yr of age, pTMT was associated with worse OM (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.14–2.91; p = 0.01) and BCSM (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.52–4.13; p < 0.01). The 5-yr cumulative incidence of salvage cystectomy in the TMT group was 3.6%. Conclusions In MIBC, patients receiving pTMT have comparable survival in RC-NAC patients ≥65 yr and inferior survival in RC-NAC patients <65 yr. Salvage cystectomy rates were low. Patient summary Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer is a multidisciplinary effort requiring thoughtful discussions with patients about treatment options, including trimodal therapy, which is an effective treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel R Cherry
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Patrick T Courtney
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nikhil Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul J Riviere
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Rana R McKay
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - A Karim Kader
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Stewart TF, Kotha NV, Dzimitrowicz HE, Makrakis D, Khaki AR, Simon NI, Nelson AA, Freeman D, Rose TL, Beck W, Chawla NS, Pal SK, Kilari D, Milowsky MI, Apolo AB, Grivas P, Zhang T, Sonpavde GP, McKay RR. Efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 therapy for patients (Pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) with primary resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy (PC). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e16515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e16515 Background: PC remains standard first-line (1L) therapy for aUC. Approximately 15% of pts exhibit primary resistance (P-R) to PC and ∼25% progress by 4 months. PD(L)1 inhibitors yield objective response rates (ORR) of ∼20% in pts with progression after PC; however, it is unclear if this benefit extends to pts with P-R to PC. We examined the efficacy of anti-PD(L)1 in pts with aUC who experienced P-R to 1L PC. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of pts with aUC who experienced P-R to PC and were subsequently treated with single-agent anti-PD(L)1 therapy. Eligibility included pts with unresectable or metastatic disease diagnosed after January 1, 2017. P-R to PC was defined as radiographic progression by RECISTv1.1 within 12 weeks from initiation of PC. Pts who developed metastatic disease while receiving (neo)adjuvant PC were eligible. Clinicopathologic variables were collected. ORR to anti-PD(L)1 was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF, defined as time from start of anti-PD(L)1 therapy to next line of therapy, hospice or death) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate (MV) analysis using Cox regression evaluating factors associated with OS was performed. Results: Overall, 42 pts were included: 74% male, median age 65 (28-90); 79% ever smokers; 21% mixed histology; 31% received definitive locoregional therapy. Metastatic sites at diagnosis of aUC included: lymph node only (19%), liver (29%), bone (38%) and lung (33%). At diagnosis of aUC, ECOG PS was 0 in 26%, 1 in 52% and unknown in 21%. 1L PC included cisplatin (76%) and carboplatin (24%) based regimens. Anti-PD(L)1 was received either 2L (98%) or 3L (2%). Overall, ORR to anti-PD(L)1 was 17%: CR (2%), PR (14%), SD (14%), PD (57%) and unknown (12%). Of the 24 pts with PD as best response to anti-PD(L)1, only 9 (38%) received subsequent therapy. Overall, median TTF was 4.2 mo (95% CI 2.8-6.7 mo) and median OS was 7.4 mo (95% CI 4.2-11.1 mo). ORR in patients with a PDL1 combined positive score ≥ 10% (n=6) was 0%: 1 SD and 5 PD. MV analysis for OS from start of anti-PD(L)1 is shown (Table). Conclusions: P-R to PC portends a poor prognosis in pts with aUC. While a subset of patients may respond to anti-PD(L)1 therapy, the majority of pts do not derive benefit. Alternative agents, e.g. antibody drug conjugates and FGFR inhibitors, and combination-therapy should be investigated for this high risk population.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler F. Stewart
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tracy L Rose
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) School of Medicine and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Wolfgang Beck
- University of North Carolina Department of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Sumanta K. Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- University of North Carolina Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Andrea B. Apolo
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Guru P. Sonpavde
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rana R. McKay
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Voora RS, Panuganti B, Flagg M, Kumar A, Kotha NV, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Nelson TJ, Weissbrod PA, Stewart TF, Rose BS, Mell LK, Califano JA, Orosco RK. Patterns of failure after definitive treatment for T4a larynx cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health System. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18006 Background: Both chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total laryngectomy (TL) with adjuvant therapy are curative-intent treatment options for patients with T4a larynx cancer. Disease recurrence is a known negative prognosicator, but differences in recurrence patterns and the subsequent survival associations are not well characterized. To address this knowledge gap, we present long-term recurrence and survival outcomes from a novel longitudinal data source. Methods: Retrospective study of non-metastatic T4a larynx cancer patients diagnosed between 2000-2017 who underwent curative-intent treatment (TL with adjuvant therapy or primary CRT) from the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database. Adjuvant therapy consisted of either postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or CRT. Fine-Gray and Cox models were used to evaluate primary outcomes – time to locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), non-cancer specific survival (NCSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). These multivariable models accounted for age, race, alcohol history, smoking status, education and income, Charlson-Deyo score, N-classification, and tumor subsite. Results: The study included 1,114 patients with a median follow-up time of 63.3 months among those alive at last follow up. In the TL group, adjuvant RT was used in 69% and adjuvant CRT was used in 31%. Median time to first recurrence was 24.4 months with overall incidence of 28.5% locoregional and 9.5% distant recurrence. Primary CRT patients had higher rates of locoregional (37.2 vs. 22.9%) and distant recurrence (13.3 vs. 7.0%) (p < 0.0001). Median OS was 27.3 months for CRT (95% CI: 23.6-32.4 months) and 47.5 months (95% CI: 39.6-52.1 months) for TL. Median DFS was 14.1 months for CRT (95% CI:12.5-17.2 months) and 37.9 months (95% CI 31.2-47.5 months) for TL. On multivariable analysis compared to CRT, TL was associated with longer time to locoregional (HR 0.50, 95% CI:0.40-0.61) and distant recurrence (HR 0.50, 95% CI:0.34-0.73). Having N+ disease increased risk of distant recurrence (HR 2.20, 95% CI:1.42-3.41). TL was associated with improved OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI:0.67 – 0.91), CSS (HR 0.73, 95% CI:0.59 – 0.89), and DFS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.69) compared to CRT; NCSS was equivalent between groups (HR 1.09, 95% CI:0.88-1.35). Of the CRT patients with locoregional failures, 67/163 (41.1%) were salvaged with surgery. Conclusions: In this cohort of T4a larynx cancer patients, surgical management demonstrated favorable recurrence and survival results. TL with adjuvant therapy was associated with significantly lower incidence of both locoregional and distant recurrence and increased OS, CSS and DFS compared to CRT. Lower probability of disease recurrence, in addition to a survival advantage, should be considered as an important advantage to up-front surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Edmund M. Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Alexander S. Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Qiao E, Kotha NV, Nalawade V, Qian A, Voora RS, Nelson TJ, Stewart TF, Parsons JK, Rose BS. Association of increased intensity of prostate-specific antigen screening in younger African American men with improved prostate cancer outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.5004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5004 Background: African-American (AA) men are substantially more likely to present with lethal prostate cancer (PCa) at younger ages than non-Hispanic White men. Despite this disparity, AA men are poorly represented in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening studies on which evidence-based PCa screening guidelines are based. This limits proper PSA screening guidance for AA men, especially for those younger than 55. We examined associations of PSA screening intensity with disease severity at diagnosis and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in AA men < 55 years of age. Methods: The earliest recommended age to begin discussion of PSA screening is 40 years. We identified AA men aged 40-55 years, diagnosed with PCa from 2004 to 2017 within the Veterans Health Administration. PSA screening was identified using procedural codes. Screening intensity was defined as percentage of years screened within the pre-diagnostic observation period. This included up to 5 years prior to diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the influence of PSA screening intensity on metastatic disease at diagnosis. Lead-time correction using published screening-dependent lead times was performed. PCSM was evaluated using Fine-Gray regression and non-cancer death as a competing event. Additional analysis was performed stratifying PSA screening into ‘High’ and ‘Low’ groups centered on the mean. Results: The cohort included 4,654 AA men at a mean age of 51.8 years with mean PSA screening rate of 53.2%. The pre-diagnostic observation period ranged from 1 to 5 years (median = 5 years). Median follow-up was 7 years. At diagnosis, there was a higher prevalence of Gleason sum ≥ 8 (Grade Group ≥ 4) and metastatic disease in the ‘Low’ group compared with the ‘High’ group ([Gleason sum ≥ 8 (Grade Group ≥ 4)]: 18.6% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.01; Metastatic disease at diagnosis: 3.7% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.01). Increased PSA screening intensity was associated with significantly reduced odds of metastatic disease at diagnosis (odds ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.47-0.81], p < 0.01) and decreased risk of PCSM (sub-distribution hazard ratio: 0.75, 95% CI = [0.59-0.95], p = 0.02). Conclusions: In this large national cohort of AA men aged 40 to 55 years, PSA screening increased intensity was associated with decreased risk of lethal disease and metastases at time of diagnosis and decreased PCSM. These data support the hypothesis that PSA screening and early prostate cancer detection may improve outcomes in younger AA men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Qiao
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nikhil V. Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Alexander Qian
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Talukder R, Makrakis D, Castellano D, Koshkin VS, Alva AS, Stewart TF, Santos VS, Jain J, Morales-Barrera R, Grant M, Nelson AA, Shreck E, Sankin A, Zakopoulou R, Rodriguez-Vida A, Liu S, Fröbe A, Di Lorenzo G, Grivas P, Khaki AR. Response and outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) based on prior intravesical BCG. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4537 Background: Little is known regarding response and outcomes to ICI for patients (pts) with aUC who were previously treated with BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. We hypothesized that prior intravesical BCG would not be associated with changes in objective response or survival in pts with aUC treated with ICI. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across 25 institutions. Demographic, intravesical BCG history, treatment and outcomes data were collected for pts with aUC who received ICI. Pts with aUC treated with ICIs were included, pts with pure non-UC, those treated with combination or on clinical trials, pts with multiple ICI treatment lines and those with upper tract UC were excluded. Pts were stratified to prior exposure versus no exposure to BCG. We compared overall response rate (ORR) using logistic regression; and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. All analyses were performed in the overall population and further stratified by treatment line (first-line [1L] vs salvage [2+L]) and multivariable models. The stratified analysis was also adjusted for an internally developed risk score for 1L and Bellmunt risk score for 2+L; p<0.05 was significant. Results: 1026 aUC pts treated with ICI were identified; 614 pts, 617 pts, and 641 pts were included in ORR, OS and PFS analyses, respectively. Overall, mean age at CPI initiation was 70, 76% were men, 70% were current or former smokers, 75% White, 29% with mixed histology, and 24% had prior exposure to BCG. ORR to ICI in pts with or without prior exposure to BCG was similar, 27% and 28% respectively (OR=0.93 [95% CI 0.61-1.42], p=0.73). Median OS (mOS) for pts with vs without prior BCG exposure was 9 vs 10 mo (HR=1.13 [95% CI 0.88-1.44], p=0.35). Median PFS (mPFS) was 4 months (mo) in both groups (HR=1.02 [95% CI 0.82-1.27], p=0.83). ORR, PFS and OS analyses stratified by ICI treatment line (1L vs 2+L) are listed in the table. Conclusions: In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis, prior intravesical BCG was not associated with objective response or survival in pts with aUC treated with ICI. Limitations of this study include retrospective nature, lack of randomization and possible confounding, but it does provide important preliminary data that selection for ICI treatment should not be impacted by prior exposure to BCG. Further clinical and molecular biomarker exploration is needed to refine patient selection for ICI in aUC.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vadim S Koshkin
- University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Jayanshu Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA
| | - Rafael Morales-Barrera
- Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Alexander Sankin
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Alejo Rodriguez-Vida
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sandy Liu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ana Fröbe
- Department of Oncology University Hospital Center Sisters of Mercy University of Zagreb Medical School, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Petros Grivas
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kotha NV, Cherry DR, Bryant AK, Nalawade V, Stewart TF, Rose BS. Prognostic utility of pretreatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in survival outcomes in localized non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Selection of an ideal clinical cutoff point. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 28:133-140. [PMID: 33997320 PMCID: PMC8089768 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a promising prognostic marker for several cancers. NLR is not useful as a marker of lung cancer survival in localized lung cancer. NLR has potential as a marker of competing mortality risk in localized lung cancer. NLR cutoff of 4.0 is proposed as a clinically useful cutoff point.
Background and purpose Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been associated with overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the utility of NLR as a predictor of lung cancer-specific survival (LCS) and identify an optimal, pretreatment cutoff point in patients with localized NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) within the Veterans Affairs’ (VA) national database. Materials and methods In the VA database, we identified patients with biopsy-proven, clinical stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2015. Cutoff points for NLR were calculated using Contal/O’Quigley’s and Cox Wald methods. Primary outcomes of OS, LCS, and non-lung cancer survival (NCS) were evaluated in Cox and Fine-Gray models. Results In 389 patients, optimal NLR cutoff was identified as 4.0. In multivariable models, NLR > 4.0 was associated with decreased OS (HR 1.44, p = 0.01) and NCS (HR 1.68, p = 0.01) but not with LCS (HR 1.32, p = 0.09). In a subset analysis of 229 patients with pulmonary function tests, NLR > 4.0 remained associated with worse OS (HR 1.51, p = 0.02) and NCS (HR 2.18, p = 0.01) while the association with LCS decreased further (HR 1.22, p = 0.39). Conclusion NLR was associated with worse OS in patients with localized NSCLC treated with SBRT; however, NLR was only associated with NCS and not with LCS. Pretreatment NLR, with a cutoff of 4.0, offers potential as a marker of competing mortality risk which can aid in risk stratification in this typically frail and comorbid population. Further studies are needed to validate pretreatment NLR as a clinical tool in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil V Kotha
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| | - Daniel R Cherry
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| | - Alex K Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Voora RS, Kotha NV, Kumar A, Qiao EM, Qian AS, Panuganti BA, Banegas MP, Weissbrod PA, Stewart TF, Rose BS, Orosco RK. Association of race and health care system with disease stage and survival in veterans with larynx cancer. Cancer 2021; 127:2705-2713. [PMID: 33799314 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) historically have inferior outcomes in comparison with White patients. The authors investigated these racial disparities within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), an equal-access system, and within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, which is representative of the US hybrid-payer system. METHODS Patients with invasive (T1 or greater) LSCC were included from SEER (2004-2015) and the VHA (2000-2017). The primary outcomes of overall survival (OS) and larynx cancer-specific survival (LCS) were evaluated in Cox and Fine-Gray models. RESULTS In the SEER cohort (7122 patients: 82.6% White and 17.4% Black), Black patients were more likely to present with advanced disease and had inferior OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.50; P < .0001) in a multivariable analysis. Black LCS was worse in a univariable analysis (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.27-1.58; P < .0001), but this effect was attenuated by 83% when the authors controlled for the TNM category and was found to be insignificant in a multivariable analysis (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.18; P = .42). In the VHA cohort (9248 patients: 79.7% White and 20.3% Black), the 2 racial cohorts presented with similar tumor characteristics and similar OS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-1.02; P = .14). Black LCS was similar in univariable (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.22; P = .05) and multivariable analyses (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.14; P = .67). CONCLUSIONS Black patients with LSCC had a tumor burden at diagnosis and survival outcomes comparable to those of White patients within the VHA; this was counter to what was observed in the SEER analysis and prior national trends. This study's findings point toward the notable role of health care access in contributing to racial health disparities in the realm of larynx cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohith S Voora
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Nikhil V Kotha
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Edmund M Qiao
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Alexander S Qian
- School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Bharat A Panuganti
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Philip A Weissbrod
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Brent S Rose
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Ryan K Orosco
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.,Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.,Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
McKay RR, Sarkar RR, Kumar A, Einck JP, Garraway IP, Lynch JA, Mundt AJ, Murphy JD, Stewart TF, Yamoah K, Rose BS. Outcomes of Black men with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy in the Veterans Health Administration. Cancer 2020; 127:403-411. [PMID: 33036065 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based studies demonstrate that Black men in the United States have an increased risk of death from prostate cancer. Determinants of racial disparities are multifactorial, including socioeconomic and biologic factors. METHODS The authors conducted a pooled analysis of patients derived from 152 centers within the Veterans Health Administration. The cohort included men who had nonmetastatic prostate diagnosed between 2001 and 2015 and received definitive radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality (ACM) and the time from a prostate-specific antigen level ≥4 ng/mL to biopsy and radiation therapy. A Cox regression model was performed to adjust for differences between clinical parameters. RESULTS Among the 31,131 patients included in the cohort, 9584 (30.8%) were Black. The 10-year cumulative incidence of death from prostate cancer was lower in Black men compared with White men (4.0% vs 4.8%; P = .004). In a competing risk model, Black race was associated with a decreased risk of PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92; P = .002). Similarly, the 10-year cumulative incidence of death from any cause was lower in Black men (27.6% vs 31.8%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, Black men had a 10% decreased risk of ACM (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The current results indicate relatively lower PCSM and ACM among Black men who were included in a large Veterans Health Administration cohort and received radiation therapy as primary treatment for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. There is an ongoing need to continue to understand and mitigate the factors associated with disparities in health care outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Reith R Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Isla P Garraway
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Julia A Lynch
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Arno J Mundt
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - James D Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Kosj Yamoah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Brent S Rose
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gul A, Stewart TF, Mantia CM, Shah NJ, Gatof ES, Long Y, Allman KD, Ornstein MC, Hammers HJ, McDermott DF, Atkins MB, Hurwitz M, Rini BI. Salvage Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:3088-3094. [PMID: 32491962 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.03315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The safety and activity of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients who have received prior ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway remains unknown. We evaluated ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC after prior treatment with anti-PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC who received prior anti-PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy and subsequently received ipilimumab and nivolumab were reviewed. Objective response rate and progression-free survival per investigator assessment were recorded. Toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab was also assessed. RESULTS Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included. All patients (100%) received prior ICIs targeting the PD-1 pathway. The median age was 62 years (range, 21-82 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the objective response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab was 20%. The median progression-free survival while on ipilimumab and nivolumab was 4 months (range, 0.8-19 months). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade with ipilimumab and nivolumab were recorded in 29 (64%) of the 45 patients; grade 3 irAEs were recorded in 6 (13%) of the 45 patients. CONCLUSION Ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic RCC who had prior treatment with checkpoint inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Gul
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.,Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Neil J Shah
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC
| | | | | | | | | | - Hans J Hammers
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - Brian I Rini
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Starrett JH, Guernet A, Cuomo ME, Poels K, van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh IK, Nagelberg A, Farnsworth D, Price K, Khan H, Ashtekar KD, Gaefele M, Ayeni D, Stewart TF, Kuhlmann A, Kaech SM, Unni AM, Homer R, Lockwood WW, Michor F, Goldberg SB, Lemmon MA, Smith P, Cross D, Politi K. Drug Sensitivity and Allele‐specificity of First‐line Osimertinib Resistance
EGFR
Mutations. FASEB J 2020. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.00612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
40
|
Starrett JH, Guernet AA, Cuomo ME, Poels KE, van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh IK, Nagelberg A, Farnsworth D, Price KS, Khan H, Ashtekar KD, Gaefele M, Ayeni D, Stewart TF, Kuhlmann A, Kaech SM, Unni AM, Homer R, Lockwood WW, Michor F, Goldberg SB, Lemmon MA, Smith PD, Cross DAE, Politi K. Drug Sensitivity and Allele Specificity of First-Line Osimertinib Resistance EGFR Mutations. Cancer Res 2020; 80:2017-2030. [PMID: 32193290 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-3819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Osimertinib, a mutant-specific third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is emerging as the preferred first-line therapy for EGFR-mutant lung cancer, yet resistance inevitably develops in patients. We modeled acquired resistance to osimertinib in transgenic mouse models of EGFRL858R -induced lung adenocarcinoma and found that it is mediated largely through secondary mutations in EGFR-either C797S or L718V/Q. Analysis of circulating free DNA data from patients revealed that L718Q/V mutations almost always occur in the context of an L858R driver mutation. Therapeutic testing in mice revealed that both erlotinib and afatinib caused regression of osimertinib-resistant C797S-containing tumors, whereas only afatinib was effective on L718Q mutant tumors. Combination first-line osimertinib plus erlotinib treatment prevented the emergence of secondary mutations in EGFR. These findings highlight how knowledge of the specific characteristics of resistance mutations is important for determining potential subsequent treatment approaches and suggest strategies to overcome or prevent osimertinib resistance in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insight into the biological and molecular properties of osimertinib resistance EGFR mutations and evaluates therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/80/10/2017/F1.large.jpg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexis A Guernet
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D Biopharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Emanuela Cuomo
- Discovery Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D Biopharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kamrine E Poels
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Iris K van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Cancer Biology Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amy Nagelberg
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dylan Farnsworth
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Hina Khan
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kumar Dilip Ashtekar
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Cancer Biology Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Deborah Ayeni
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Tyler F Stewart
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alexandra Kuhlmann
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan M Kaech
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, California
| | - Arun M Unni
- Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Robert Homer
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Service, VA CT HealthCare System, West Haven, Connecticut
| | - William W Lockwood
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; The Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts; and The Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mark A Lemmon
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Cancer Biology Institute, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Paul D Smith
- R&D Oncology, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Katerina Politi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Medicine (Section of Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
This paper aims to provide designers with a framework to help them organise and apply ergonomics and human factors literature to the design of man-computer interfaces. The framework or classification is primarily concerned with the software interface and its use is illustrated in some human factors recommendations for the design of displays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T F Stewart
- HUSAT Research Group, Department of Human Sciences, University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
The paper reports a survey of interactive computer usage by designers, engineers, economists and other specialists in several industrial organisations. Sixty-nine of these specialists were interviewed about both hardware interface problems, eg, keyboard layout, and software interface problems, eg, how system organisation affects the way the specialist tackles his work. The results of the survey show that interactive computing can be of considerable assistance to specialists, although there are often many difficulties in using the computer system to full advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T F Stewart
- Department of Ergonomics and Cybernetics, University of Technology, Loughborough, England
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Stewart TF. Treatment of coronary disease in the Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital. J Am Inst Homeopath 1966; 59:6-19. [PMID: 5951949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|