Anti-tumor necrosis factor α: originators versus biosimilars, comparison in clinical response assessment in a multicenter cohort of patients with inflammatory arthropathies

OBJECTIVE

To compare etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars (SB4 and ABP501) and respective bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest.

METHODS

We consequently enrolled patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, treated with SB4, and ABP501, or with corresponding originators, belonging to the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region (Italy), from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected at recruitment and after 4, 8, 12, and 24 months of therapy.

RESULTS

The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars [SB4/ABP501 276/179; female/male 307/146; biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-DMARD) naïve 56%, median age/ interquartile range 55/46-65 years] and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, female/ male 279/157, b-DMARD naïve 67,2%, median age/interquartile range 53/43-62 years). No differences were found about safety, but the biosimilar group presented more discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001). Female gender, being a smoker, and being b-DMARD naïve were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0.05, p=0.046, p=0.001 respectively). The retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at 4 months showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until 24 months (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented a cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Real-life data demonstrated a similar safety profile between biosimilars and originators, but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months. Biosimilars could be considered a valid, safe, and less expensive alternative to originators, allowing access to treatments for a wider patient population.

AB0380 ANTI-TNFα: ORIGINATORS vs BIOSIMILARS, COMPARISON IN CLINICAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN A MULTICENTER COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHROPATHIES

Background

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α is one of principal proinflammatory cytokines involved in pathogenesis of different inflammatory arthropathies as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS). Biotechnological drugs, represented among others by monoclonal antibodies directed against TNF-α, lead to a revolution in RA and spondylarthritis treatment. They were the first biological drugs used to treat these diseases, with good results in terms of safety and efficacy. Also because of high cost of these drugs, for some years biosimilars have been introduced in clinical practice. Biosimilars are less expensive (in Italy, less of 30% than bioriginators); they underwent to a severe process of “comparability” to assess safety and efficacy like their originators. In Italy, AIFA authorized SB4 (etanercept biosimilar), SB5 and ABP501 (adalimumab biosimilars) after passing III-phase randomized clinical trials; but real-life data and registers are lacking.

Objectives

Aim of this study is to compare biosimilars and bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest.

Methods

We consequently enrolled patients, affected by inflammatory arthropathies (RA, PsA, AS) and treated with biosimilars (SB4, ABP501), belonging to any of the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region, from 2017 to 2020. Moreover, we enrolled patients, affected by same inflammatory diseases, but treated with corresponding originator. Clinical and laboratory data as well as disease activity indices, were collected at recruitment (T0) and after 4 (T1), 8 (T2), 12 (T3) and 24 (T4) months of therapy. Adverse events were registered.

Results

The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars (SB4/ABP501 276/179; F/M 307/146; naïve 56%, median age/IQR 55/46-65) and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, F/M 279/157, naïve 67,2%, median age/IQR 53/43-62). No differences were found about safety, but biosimilar group presented a higher number of discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001), observed at all time-points. Female gender, to be smoker and b-DMARDs naïve, the initial non-response to the drug were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0,05, p=0,046, p=0,001 respectively). Retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (with a median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at T1 showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until at T4 (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented an important cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Real-life data demonstrated the same safety between biosimilars and originators but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months, about 76%. Despite their loss efficacy, biosimilars could be considered valid and safe, and a good and less expensive alternative to the originators, allowing access to these innovative treatments to a wider patient population.

References

[1]Feldmann, M. & Maini, R. N. Anti-TNFα therapy of rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned? Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2001;19, 163–196.

[2]McInnes IB, Schett G (2007) Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol 7:429–442

[3]Velayudhan J, Chen YF, Rohrbach A, Pastula C, Maher G, Thomas H, et al. Demonstration of functional similarity of proposed biosimilar ABP 501 to adalimumab. BioDrugs. 2016;30(4):339– 51.

[4]Emery P, Vencovsky ́ J, Sylwestrzak A et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of SB4 (etanercept biosimilar) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison between continuing SB4 and switching from etanercept reference product to SB4. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 75:236.

Figure 1.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

Intradermal therapy (mesotherapy): the lower the better

BACKGROUND

Intradermal therapy (mesotherapy) is a technique used to inject drugs into the surface layer of the skin. The intradermal micro deposit allows to modulate the kinetics of drugs, slowing down its absorption and prolonging the local mechanism of action. This technique is applied in the treatment of some forms of localized pain when a systemic drug-saving effect is useful, when it is necessary to synergize with other pharmacological or non-pharmacological thera-pies, when other therapies have failed or cannot be used.

AIM

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of a mixture with respect to its lower concentration. We also wanted to evaluate the number of sessions needed to reach the therapeutic goal (50% reduction in pain from baseline) in patients with acute or chronic neck pain.

METHOD

We analyzed retrospectively data from 62 patients with cervicobrachial pain treated with intradermal drugs. Group A received a mixture of drugs; group B received half the dose of drugs.

RESULTS

Patients who received a lower concentration of drugs achieved similar results to those who received a higher dose. The therapeutic goal was achieved on average with 3.5 + 1.7 sessions on a weekly basis (min 1; max 9). Subjects in group A required 4+1.7 treatments (min 1; max 9), while subjects in group B required 3+1.5 treatments (min 1; max 7).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that even a lower dose of drugs can induce a clinically useful result. This study confirms that the useful effect of mesotherapy is only partly due to the pharmacological action. Further randomized prospective studies are needed to standardize the technique in the various pain syndromes, but it is recommended to follow the guidelines of the Italian Society of Mesotherapy to ensure patients receive appropriate treatment.

Biologics for psoriatic arthritis: network meta-analysis in review

OBJECTIVE

A review of network meta-analysis to assess efficacy and safety of biologics for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on electronic databases to identify Bayesian meta-analysis reporting clinical parameters of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of biologics that are approved for the treatment of PsA patients.

RESULTS

We identified 19 studies and included them for review. There is insufficient statistical evidence to demonstrate clear differences in effectiveness between available biologic agents for PsA due to many differences in methods and clinical parameters reported in the studies. Old biologics are reported to be safe.

CONCLUSIONS

New molecules approved for the treatment of PsA appear promising treatments but further comparative studies methodologically well-conducted are necessary. It is also necessary to follow strictly international recommendations to conduct NMA to better help physicians and decision-makers in making appropriate decisions.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Immune Response in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease

Subjects with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have an intrinsic higher probability to develop active-tuberculosis (TB) compared to the general population. The risk ranges from 2.0 to 8.9 in RA patients not receiving therapies. According to the WHO, the RA prevalence varies between 0.3% and 1% and is more common in women and in developed countries. Therefore, the identification and treatment of TB infection (TBI) in this fragile population is important to propose the TB preventive therapy. We aimed to study the M. tuberculosis (Mtb) specific T-cell response to find immune biomarkers of Mtb burden or Mtb clearance in patients with different TB status and different risk to develop active-TB disease. We enrolled TBI subjects as example of Mtb-containment, the active-TB as example of a replicating Mtb status, and the TBI-IMID as fragile population. To study the Mtb-specific response in a condition of possible Mtb sterilization, we longitudinally enrolled TBI subjects and active-TB patients before and after TB therapy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated overnight with Mtb peptides contained in TB1- and TB2-tubes of the Quantiferon-Plus kit. Then, we characterized by cytometry the Mtb-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells. In TBI-IMID, the TB therapy did not affect the ability of CD4 T cells to produce interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-2, their functional status, and their phenotype. The TB therapy determined a contraction of the triple functional CD4 T cells of the TBI subjects and active-TB patients. The CD45RA- CD27+ T cells stood out as a main subset of the Mtb-specific response in all groups. Before the TB-preventive therapy, the TBI subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27+CD4+ T cells and the active-TB subjects had higher proportion of Mtb-specific CD45RA-CD27-CD4+ T cells compared to other groups. The TBI-IMID patients showed a phenotype similar to TBI, suggesting that the type of IMID and the IMID therapy did not affect the activation status of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells. Future studies on a larger and better-stratified TBI-IMID population will help to understand the change of the Mtb-specific immune response over time and to identify possible immune biomarkers of Mtb-containment or active replication.

A Call to Action by the Italian Mesotherapy Society on Scientific Research

Mesotherapy (local intradermal therapy, LIT) is a technique used to slowly spread drugs in tissues underlying the site of injection to prolong the pharmacological effect with respect to intramuscular injection. Recommendations for proper medical use of this technique have been made for pain medicine and rehabilitation, chronic venous disease, sport medicine, musculoskeletal disorders, several dermatological conditions, skin ageing, and immune-prophylaxis. Although mesotherapy is considered a valid technique, unresolved questions remain, which should be answered to standardize methodology and dosing regimen as well as to define the right indications in clinical practice. New randomized controlled trials are needed to test single products (dose, frequency of administration, efficacy and safety). Even infiltration of substances for dermo-cosmetic purposes must be guided by safety and efficacy tests before being proposed by mesotherapy. In this article, we put forth a preclinical and clinical research plan and a health technology assessment as a call to action by doctors, researchers and scientific societies to aid national health authorities in considering mesotherapy for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation paths.

A review of network meta-analysis comparing biologics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Even though in recent years significant improvements have been made in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis due to the introduction of biologic agents, it is still difficult to identify the most effective and safest available treatment. The choice and comparison between biological agents are a challenge, for only limited head-to-head clinical studies are available. The aim of this manuscript is to review the published network meta-analysis (NMA) to gain a better understanding of efficacy and safety of biological agents and small molecules in the management of RA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify network meta-analyses from 2008 to June 2019 comparing efficacy and safety of licensed biological agents and tsDMARDS at the approved dosages using predefined text words related to the topic. The following scenarios have been investigated: patients not responding to csDMARD (cDMARDs - IR); csDMARD naïve patients; patients not responding to biologics (bDMARDs - IR); patients in biological monotherapy.

RESULTS

On the basis of the data present in the literature, we are able to hypothesize some trends of response in terms of efficacy in different subsets of patients, for example patients in monotherapy, bDMARds unresponsive patients, and Methotrexate-naive patients. The differences of the results presented in many works are due to the different inclusion criteria used in the studies, the type of biologics agent used in each study (according to the available molecules in the different years of publication), as well as differences in the methodology of NMA and in the presentation of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the next NMA follows the indications suggested by the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) so that the results are comparable and comprehensible.

Characterization of QuantiFERON-TB-Plus results in latent tuberculosis infected patients with or without immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

OBJECTIVES

Screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) diagnosis is mandatory in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) requiring biologics. QuantiFERON-TB-Plus (QFT-P), an LTBI diagnostic test, measures IFN-γ after M. tuberculosis-stimulation in TB1 and TB2 tubes in which a "CD4" or a "CD4 and CD8" response is respectively elicited. Aim of this study is to compare the response to QFT-P of IMID-LTBI patients candidates to a new biological therapy vs LTBI-subjects without IMID.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 167 subjects: 61 IMID-LTBI and 106 NON-IMID-LTBI.

RESULTS

All subjects were mitogen-responders. IFN-γ production was significantly lower in IMID-LTBI-patients compared to NON-IMID-LTBI-subjects. We observed discordant TB1 and TB2 results in 6.5% of IMID-LTBI-patients and in 8% of NON-IMID-LTBI-subjects. Applying a logistic regression analysis, we found that IMID-LTBI patients had a higher probability (TB1 stimulation OR 3.32; TB2 stimulation OR 4.33) to have IFNγ results ≤0.7 IU/mL compared to NON-IMID-LTBI-subjects. Interestingly, IMID-treatment did not interfere with the distribution of IFNγ-values.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that IMID-LTBI-patients have a low IFN-γ response to QFT-P, a high proportion of results ranging in the grey zone and a distribution of IFNγ-values independent from the IMID-treatment. These results are important for the management of LTBI screening in IMID patients.

Use of viscosupplementation for the recovery of active football players complaining of knee pain

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of intra-articular hyaluronic acid administration in active football players complaining of knee pain after sports activity. Efficacy and safety profiles of intra-articular hyaluronic acid and time needed for football players to recover and restart sports activity were examined.

Methods

Clinical data of active football players reporting knee pain after sports activity were included in this retrospective study. All patients who received an intra-articular injection at time 0 and after 2 weeks were included in the study. Patients underwent laboratory examination, knee X-ray, ultrasound, and clinical examination before receiving the intra-articular injection. Effusions or cysts were drained before injections. Lequesne index score, pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, and patient’s global assessment score were recorded at time 0 (day of the first injection), 1 and 2 days after the first injection, at 2 weeks (day of the second injection), and at follow-up visits. Only data from patients completing the follow-up were analyzed.

Results

Data from 17 patients were analyzed: 16 males and one female, of which three were professional players (two males and one female) and 14 were nonprofessional players. The mean age of patients was 39.8±11.8 years. Two patients (one male and one female) showed joint effusion. Two patients reported relevant joint pain after injection that regressed without any medication. At the first week, all parameters examined indicated improvement that was maintained until the end of follow-up. One day after the first and second injection, patients reported a slight increase in pain VAS score, which was not statistically significant, and the pain resolved after 1 day. All patients successfully restarted playing after the first injection within 3.1±2.0 days and kept playing after the second injection following our indication (1 day of break).

Conclusion

The use of a medium-molecular weight hyaluronic acid in football players affected by knee osteoarthritis seems efficacious and safe and resulted, in our experience, a stable improvement of symptoms; moreover, it allowed a rapid restart of sports activity. Larger studies on larger populations are needed to confirm these findings.

HyalOne® in the treatment of symptomatic hip OA - data from the ANTIAGE register: seven years of observation

OBJECTIVE

Several studies on knee osteoarthritis suggest that the intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid products may be a relevant option in the management of patients with persistent pain. The aim of this study is to report the data of efficacy of US-guided HyalOne®/Hyalubrix® 60 injections in a large population of patients with hip osteoarthritis, repeated at least 2 times per year for up to seven years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, post-marketing, cohort study. Data were collected from the ANTIAGE registry. Values of Lequesne index, pain VAS, NSAIDs intake, global medical and patients assessments were evaluated every six months from the baseline to the end of the follow-up, seven years later. The inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis of at least 1-year duration, and up to 84 months of follow-up. All the patients received hyaluronic acid injections at least every six months, using ultrasound guidance to ensure accurate placement.

RESULTS

1022 patients were included in the study. The patients were categorized by age classes, gender, and body mass index (BMI). All the groups show a statistically significant reduction at all time points compared to baseline values of Lequesne index, pain VAS, NSAIDs intake, global medical and patients assessments. There are slight differences in the subgroups of overweighted, obese and over 70 years patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the clinical efficacy and safety of HyalOne®/Hyalubrix®60 in patients affected by osteoarthritis. This is the first study, reporting on a large cohort of patients in different categories with a long follow-up on seven years. The data confirm the proper use of ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation (VS) as background therapy in the management of hip osteoarthritis.

An open randomized active-controlled clinical trial with low-dose SKA cytokines versus DMARDs evaluating low disease activity maintenance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Biologic agents are currently the strongest immunosuppressive drugs able to induce remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). One of the objectives of the medical scientific community now is how to maintain remission or low disease activity (LDA). The aim of this trial is to evaluate the contribution of low-dose sequential kinetic activation (SKA) IL-4, IL-10, and anti-IL-1 antibodies (10 fg/mL) in patients affected by RA in maintaining LDA or remission obtained after biological therapy.

Method

This is a randomized, open, active-controlled, prospective, Phase IV trial. Disease activity score (DAS28), clinical disease activity index, simplified disease activity index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels, global health assessment, and pain visual analog scale were evaluated at baseline visit and then every 3 months together with an assessment of side effects till 12 months. Thirty-nine RA patients were enrolled and randomized to continue disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) therapy or to receive a combination of SKA low-dose cytokines formulated in concentration of 10 fg/mL orally administered at a dose of 20 drops/d for 12 consecutive months.

Results

The rate of maintenance of LDA at 12 months was superior in the group treated with low-dose cytokines compared with patients treated with DMARDs, 66.7% and 42.1%, respectively; however, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. No side effects were reported in both groups.

Conclusion

This is the first study using a combination of three low-dose cytokines in RA, after data published on psoriasis. These data suggest that the use of a combination of low-dose SKA cytokines may be an opportunity to explore in the management of RA.

Anti-TNF treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients with moderate disease activity: a prospective observational multicentre study (MODERATE)

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate disease activity show progression of joint damage and have impaired quality of life, physical function, work and daily activities. Little is known about management of patients with moderate RA. The aim of the study was to assess the 1-year response to anti-TNF in biologic-naïve RA patients with moderate (3.2 <DAS28 ≤5.1) disease activity despite DMARD treatment, in the Italian clinical practice.

METHODS

The MODERATE study is a multicentre prospective, cohort non-interventional study, conducted in 19 Italian rheumatology sites. Patients with moderate RA, diagnosed according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR criteria, were enrolled if they also were aged ≥18 years, had disease onset after 16 years old, moderate disease at baseline (DAS28 score >3.2 and ≤5.1), and were naïve to anti-TNF treatment.

RESULTS

Among 157 RA patients, 93 (59%) underwent etanercept, 43 (22%) adalimumab, 26 (17%) certolizumab, 10 golimumab and 2 infliximab; 80% of patients were still in treatment after 12-month observation. One-year clinical remission was achieved by 27 RA patients (21%), reduction of DAS28 score greater than 1.2 was observed in 75 (58%) patients. Moderate and good response according to EULAR criteria was observed in 59 (46%) and 45 (35%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Results confirm the efficacy of anti-TNF alpha also in moderate RA patients, who may achieve a substantial decrease of disease activity, and improve their quality of life. The low rate of patients achieving remission may suggest that therapeutic strategies should be more timely and aggressive.

A double blind randomized active-controlled clinical trial on the intra-articular use of Md-Knee versus sodium hyaluronate in patients with knee osteoarthritis ("Joint")

Background

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of a group of patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA) treated with MD-Knee (Guna S.p.a., Milan, Italy) versus a group of patients treated with sodium hyaluronate.

Method

This non-inferiority prospective randomized controlled trial involved 60 patients affected by knee OA, grade 2–3 of Kellgren-Lawrence scale. The MD-Knee Group, Group A (n = 29) was administered five intra-articular injections at 1 week interval; the sodium hyaluronate Group, Group B (n = 31), was administered five doses of intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate at 1 week interval. All patients were prospectively evaluated before and at 3 and 6 months after the treatment by the Lequesne Knee Index (LKI) as primary endpoint and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Pain Killer consumption and SF-36 questionnaires as secondary endpoints.

Results

At the 3- and 6 month follow-up, LKI and VAS improved significantly in both groups compared to baseline and no statistically significant differences were observed between Group A and Group B. There was no statistically significant difference in the SF36 questionnaire score and pain killer consumption between two groups at any time point.

Conclusions

This study shows that both preparations exert similar clinical effects as assessed through multiple outcome measures. MD-Knee is effective on knee OA symptoms over 6 months after a 5-weekly injection course, and it is equally effective as the reference sodium hyaluronate.

Trial registration

Trial registration number: ISRCTN93862496. Registration date: January 18th, 2016

Duration of symptom relief after intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid combined with sorbitol (anti-ox-vs) in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis

The intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid (HA) in hip osteoarthritis (OA) has been recently increased following the use of ultrasound guidance to perform an accurate delivery of the injected product. Viscosupplementation in hip OA seems to show similar results to those obtained by viscosupplementation in knee OA. However, an unmet need is the duration of symptomatic relief, therefore several new products are proposed to prolong and increase symptomatic effects. Among these, an innovative viscosupplement has been produced from high a concentration of HA combined with a high concentration of sorbitol as a free radical scavenger. The aim of this study is to evaluate the mid-term pain-relief effect of an ultrasound-guided injection of SynolisV-A (ANTI-OX-VS) in patients suffering from symptomatic hip osteoarthritis. Lequesne index, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), pain reduction, Global Patient Assessment (GPA), Global Medical Assessment (GMA) and reduction in monthly analgesic consumption were assessed during the 12-month follow-up after the injection. A total of 20 patients were enrolled in the study and received one IA US-guided injection of two syringes of ANTI-OX-VS into the target hip. Eleven drop-out patients were registered, of whom 2 were for loss of efficacy at 6 months, 1 for loss of efficacy at 9 months and 8 patients for severe comorbilities. Mean scores of all clinical parameters evaluated at each control visit were significantly different when compared with baseline mean value. No systemic adverse events were observed. Even though the sample size of this study is limited, the results suggest a durable good efficacy of a 4-ml single injection of ANTI-OX-VS in hip OA, at least for the patients who completed the study. A larger number of patients and an RCT are needed to confirm these data, investigating also the predictive factors of clinical response to ANTI-OX-VS.

Towards the identification of early stage osteoarthritis

A variety of genetic and environmental factors contribute to the progressive develop of OA. It is necessary to identify people who are developing initial changes in cartilage and/or subchondral bone before onset of classical radiological features in order to detect early phase of OA. Recent quantitative MRI techniques can evaluate the structural, mechanical and biochemical characteristics of cartilage. T2 mapping is able to assess cartilage volume and defects measurement, delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) and Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) can reveal Cartilage GAG content. Accurate and reliable serum, urine and synovial fluid biomarkers are also requested. Several biomarkers have been studied and proposed, but there are many critical issues to consider for inferring useful data from studies on biomarkers in early OA such as phase of disease, specific joint sites, systemic concentrations, circadian rhythm, their clearance from the joint, etc. Recently proteomics has produced great expectations to improve the early diagnosis of OA. These discoveries may open opportunities for the identification of early stage of OA leading to manage the symptoms and ultimately slow the progression of OA.

Radiological outcomes in randomized controlled trials on biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review

Several scores are currently used to estimate the radiologic progression of patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis. Modified Sharp score, Genant-modified Sharp score and van der Heijde-modified Sharp score are actually the most commonly used scores in randomized controlled trials on biologic drugs actually available in scientific literature. An intensive literature search (EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE) was performed in order to identify randomized controlled studies reporting on the efficacy of biologic drugs on radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis by means of approved scoring methods such as Sharp score variants. All studies were evaluated for their approach to radiologic outcome, and a global evaluation of trends towards radiologic evaluation was performed. Eighteen studies were identified and analyzed, and data from such randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reported and described regarding their approach to radiologic outcomes. The use of three different scoring methodologies generated similar but non-comparable data; although a big part of the studies reported good efficacy profiles of several biologic drugs on radiologic progression, data from such studies are not comparable as the three different scoring methods are not convertible from one to another. At present, there is no standardization for the evaluation of radiologic outcomes, thus preventing comparison of results obtained by different drugs. The use of a single, standardized and widely approved scoring method would grant the possibility of comparing such data.

Safety of intra-articular hip injection of hyaluronic acid products by ultrasound guidance: an open study from ANTIAGE register

OBJECTIVE

We developed a standardized technique for ultrasound guided intra-articular injection of the hip joint with the purpose of extending routine intra-articular injection of hyaluronans and steroids to the hip, as commonly used in the knee. In this article we report the safety of this technique in an extended series of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were injected supine with an anterosuperior approach under ultrasound guidance. The Us probe is applied with a target device for biopsy.

RESULTS

The standardised technique was used to inject 1906 patients with 4002 injections of hyaluronan products over a four-year period. The treatment was well tolerated with few, and exclusively local, side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of hyaluronans under ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection is a safe technique for treatment of rheumatic diseases of the hip.

Ranking antireabsorptive agents to prevent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis by mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates are considered as a first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, showing in double-blind, randomized, controlled trials a significant reduction of incidence of new vertebral fractures compared to placebo. Recently also, Denosumab has been shown to reduce the appearance of new vertebral fractures by blocking RANK. There are not head to head comparative studies between the above mentioned drugs. Mixed treatment comparison, an extension of traditional meta-analysis, is able to compare simultaneously several drugs across a range producing a synthetic evidence of efficacy and a range of probability as to the best treatment.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to simultaneously compare alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab in the prevention of OP vertebral fractures in a Bayesian meta-analysis for assessing indirect comparisons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search for randomized controlled trials involving alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab was conducted using several databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a double blind treatment period of at least 3 years were included. Men and Glucorticoid Induced osteoporosis, RCTs having as primary or secondary endpoints continuous values as body mineral density (BMD) and studies comparing different dosing regimens of the same agent, which are not used in clinical practice, were excluded. Only fully published reports were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 9 RCTs were identified providing data on 31,393 participants. Zolendronate had the highest probability (52%) of being the most effective treatment towards placebo, followed by denosumab (46% probability), ibandronate and then alendronate and risedronate against placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the mixed treatment comparisons among alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, zolendronate and denosumab did not show a statistically significant difference, this analysis suggests that zolendronate, compared to placebo, is expected to provide the highest rate of reduction in vertebral fractures affecting osteoporosis affected patients.

Approach in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis prevention: results from the Italian multicenter observational EGEO study

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is the most frequent cause of secondary osteoporosis. GIO is linked to glucocorticoids (GC) daily assumption with maximum effect within first months of treatment and decreasing to basal levels as the therapy is discontinued. In Italy, primary prevention of GIO is suggested when GC therapy (prednisone >5 mg/day or equivalent) is taken for longer than 3 months. Lazio GISMO (Italian Group for Study and Diagnosis of Bone Metabolism Diseases) group organized the GC and Osteoporosis Epidemiology study (EGEO) to evaluate physician's approach in preventing GIO. The study involved 19 osteoporosis centers. Patients taking long-term GC therapy were recruited and information collected: medical history and anthropometric data, GC therapy, primary disease, physician's specialty, osteopororosis screening, and pharmacological intervention. The study included 1334 patients. Mean age was 63 ± 13 yr; 243 (18%) patients had a history of falls from standing position in the previous 12 months, 78 (35%) vertebral fractures, 91 (41%) fractures other than vertebral, 27 (12%) femoral fractures, and 27 (12%) multiple sites fractures. The molecules of GC more often prescribed were prednisone and 6-metil prednisolone. One thousand and forty patients (78%) were taking GC for more than 6 months. GC therapy was prescribed more frequently by rheumatologists (62%). Antiosteoporotic drugs for GIO prevention were prescribed in 431 patients (32%). Among the patients, only 27% (360) received calcium and vitamin D supplements, and 39% (319) treated by rheumatologists received anti-resorptive drugs. In conclusion, our data show that in Italy, as already described elsewhere, only a small subpopulation of GC-treated patients was supported by an anti-osteoporotic therapy, indicating the need to further stimulate awareness of both patients and specialists, prescribing GC therapy, to an appropriate and prompt GIO prevention.

Prevalence study of iliopsoas bursitis in a cohort of 860 patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis

We used ultrasound to evaluate iliopsoas bursitis (IB) prevalence in 860 patients (568 males, 292 females, 62 ± 7 years) suffering from symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III-IV hip osteoarthritis. Lequesne index and visual analogue scale (VAS) were recorded. Anterior hip was scanned and images recorded. Maximum IB diameter was measured and drained (volume recorded). Two radiologists evaluated the presence of IB, joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, communication between bursa and articular space. IB was found in 19/860 (2.2%) patients (16 males, 3 females, 65 ± 11 years; grade II osteoarthritis = 4; III = 9; IV = 6). Mean bursa diameter = 2.9 ± 0.9 cm, volume = 35 ± 34 mL. Effusion was present in 9/19 patients, hypertrophy in 6/19 and communication in 9/19. In patients with no IB, effusion was detected in 27/860 and hypertrophy in 25/860 (p < 0.001 compared with IB patients). κ = 1 for all. VAS index and Lequesne index were not significantly different between patients with or without IB (p ≥ 0.468). Ultrasound can detect associate findings in grade II-IV hip osteoarthritis patients with high reproducibility.

Total hip replacement rate in a cohort of patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis following intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (MW 1,500-2,000 kDa) ORTOBRIX study

Hip osteoarthritis is very common and costly. The European League Against Rheumatology Committee agenda asks for research to investigate treatments able to slow down the progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA), to delay joint replacement, and to determine the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical and surgical treatment modalities as well as criteria relating to the indications for and timing of total hip replacement (THR). After publishing the results of a randomized controlled trial and a cohort study on the efficacy of Intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (MW 1,500-2,000 kDa) on symptomatic hip OA, we performed this retrospective study in patients suffering from hip OA treated with ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of HyalOne (Hyalubrix 60 Italian brand name) involving a group of THR expert orthopedic surgeons to appraise whether or not considered eligible for THR and the frequency and timing of THR. Six orthopedists, not routinely performing hip intra-articular injections, each independently assessed whether 176 patients suffering from hip OA and treated with ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of sodium hyaluronate (MW 1,500-2,000 kDa) were candidates for THR according to the clinical data (age, body mass index, Pain Visual Analog Scale, Lequesne Algofunctional Index, global patient assessment, global physician assessment, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, and hip X-ray) collected at the first intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injection visit and provided as anonymous electronic data. At 24 months, 159 out of 76 (90 %) patients did not undergo to THR. At 48 months, 82 % (N = 144) of the study population treated with intra-articular hyaluronic acid avoided THR. In the group of 93 patients considered candidates for THR (that is, in which 4, 5, or 6 orthopedic surgeons agreed that the patient was a suitable candidate for THR), only 17 had undergone THR, with survival results of 82 % at 24 months. At 48 months, this percentage reduced to 66 % in this group. In the other groups of patients (in which respectively 3, 2, 1 or no surgeons were in agreement that the patient was a candidate for THR) arthroplasty is not recorded. Sodium hyaluronate (MW 1,500-2,000 kDa) given by ultrasound-guided injection seems to delay THR in the real context of actual overall management of symptomatic hip OA patients. Although further studies are necessary to confirm these data and to identify outcome predictors, hip viscosupplementation should be considered as conservative treatment to perform before proposing patients for THR.

The impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic hip OA: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

There is scarce data available on intra-articular hyaluronan's ability to modify the progression of osteoarthritis (OA).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective pilot study was to assess the impact of treatment with hylan G-F 20 on progression to total hip replacement (THR) in patients with symptomatic hip OA.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The records of patients presenting with symptomatic hip OA and treated with hylan G-F 20 were analysed. Endpoints were the number of THRs performed and the survival time (in months) between commencement of treatment and THR, if performed. Endpoints were evaluated for the entire study population and for those sub-groups of patients which were, or were not, defined as candidates for THR prior to intra-articular treatment. Predictive factors of progression to THR were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 850 patients' records were evaluated and 224 patients' data were included in the study and evaluated. Eighty-four patients (37.5%) progressed to THR, 206 patients (92.0%) achieved 12 months survival, 170 patients (75.9%) achieved 24 months survival, and 69 patients (30.8%) achieved 5 years survival. Mean survival time was 36 months. Classification as a THR candidate, Lequesne score, ultrasound pattern and the presence of diabetes were predictive factors for progression to THR.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that hylan G-F 20 could be included in the management of symptomatic hip OA before recommendation for THR, particularly in patients presenting with milder symptoms, or in patients where, due to comorbidities or personal choice, THR is not a feasible option. Limitations of this study include the retrospective study design and the lack of a control group to determine any placebo effect of hylan G-F 20. Further prospective studies are therefore needed to corroborate these results.

Mixed-treatment comparison of anabolic (teriparatide and PTH 1-84) therapies in women with severe osteoporosis

PURPOSE

The recent development of compounds with anabolic action on bone have increased the range of therapeutic options for the treatment of osteoporosis and the prevention of fractures. Two major PTH analogs, the synthetic full-length 1-84 PTH molecule and the recombinant 1-34 N-terminal fragment (teriparatide), are available for the treatment of osteoporosis in many countries. There have bee no comparative trials on the bone anabolic effects of these compounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study we applied a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) to compare the efficacy of teriparatide versus PTH 1-84 for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in women with severe osteoporosis. With this approach the relative treatment effect of one intervention over another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head comparison. Among the candidate papers selected for analysis, two randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of teriparatide and PTH 1-84 met the selection criteria and underwent MTC analysis.

RESULTS

Based on a fixed-effect MTC model analysis of data from two RCTs, teriparatide (20 µg/day) showed a 70% and 94% probability of being the best treatment for the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, respectively. Together with a lack of statistical significance, this study has additional limitations. Some differences in trial procedures and populations exist; another limitation concerns the impossibility of carrying out a randomized-effect model MTC, due to sample exiguity. Furthermore, in order to consider unknown or unmeasured differences of covariates across trials, a random-effects approach would be preferred in order to assess the presence of heterogeneity across comparisons. In contrast, in our analysis a fixed-effect MTC model only was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide is expected to provide a greater efficacy over PTH 1-84 with both vertebral and non-vertebral fracture prevention in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis.

May etanercept and PTH (1-34) association heal erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by the formation in the joints of an inflammatory tissue, which causes the appearance of localized erosions on the margins of the joints. The molecular mechanism that causes the bone erosion is multifactorial. Inflammatory cytokines imbalance and OPG-RANK-L system are involved.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The aim of the study is to evaluate the possibility of inducing healing or reduction in the number of erosions in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha adding Teriparatide (PTH1-34) to standard treatment with anti-TNF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty adult patients with active RA diagnosed according to American Rheumatism Association (ARA) criteria at least 6 months before study begin were enrolled. Only patients affected by established RA (6 to 18 months from symptoms beginning) were recruited. Eligible patients were randomized to receive a standard dosage of etanercept (50 mg/week) or etanercept at same dosage with an addition of teriparatide (20 mg). Evaluation of eventual healing of arthritic erosions by magnetic resonance imaging was performed at time zero and then at twelve months. The following evaluation was assessed at baseline and after 12 months according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) definitions: number of erosion and presence or absence of synovitis, effusion and bone oedema. A comparative examination of quantitative and qualitative assessment of each parameter was applied. Plain radiographs of the hands were obtained at baseline and 52 weeks. Radiographs were scored blindly using the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp method. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by means of the adverse events (AES) evaluation and report.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The study did not achieve its primary endpoint of healing erosions. In the active arm no healing of erosions was found. At 52 weeks, there were no new MRI erosions in two arms. Bone oedema scores were significantly improved at 52 weeks in favour of both treatments versus baseline scores, without inter-groups differences. X-ray patterns were unchanged in all patients of both groups. No new erosions or previous erosions' healing were observed. No AEs were reported. Patients from both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in the DAS 28 scores at 52 weeks (p < 0.005) if compared with baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm rapid control of inflammation and MRI damage benefits after Etanercept administration without a significant improvement in MRI findings after concomitant addition of teriparatide. Even though these results could seem to suggest to avoid the simultaneous use of these two drugs to treat RA erosions, further studies might be suggested to asses if sequential adminstration of an anabolic agent such as Teriparatide, after achieving clinical remission, may be able to improve bone damage.

Intra-Articular Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% in Patients Affected by Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis: Effectiveness and Safety in a Large Cohort of Patients

The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess the efficacy and safety profile of intraarticular Sinovial® Forte 1.6% administered under ultrasound-guidance in a large cohort of patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). Patients with symptomatic hip OA referred to our clinic in 2008–2010 received one 4 ml (2 vials) intra-articular injection of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% under ultrasound guidance. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for a total of 6 months and were offered an optional, additional injection at the 3-month follow-up visit if clinically justified. At each visit, pain scores [0–10 Visual Analogue Scale (pain VAS)], Lequesne index scores and NSAID intake were recorded. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. An effect size of 30% and 50% reduction in Lequesne index and Pain VAS scores was evaluated for each patient to ascertain the number of patients achieving partial remission of symptoms and functional impairment by the use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in hip osteoarthritis. One hundred and fourteen patients completed the 6-month follow-up and received a total of 142 injections. A statistically significant reduction in Lequesne index scores, VAS pain scores and NSAID consumption was observed at all time-points ( p < 0.05). No systemic, severe or even moderate side effects were observed. Only 7 patients reported mild local reaction at the injection site, consisting of mild pain and localized warmth, which resolved spontaneously without any additional medication. This study provides evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% in the treatment of patients affected by symptomatic hip OA. Sinovial® Forte may also offer economical benefits, owing to the reduction in NSAID consumption associated with this treatment. The percentage of patients achieving the effect size of 30% and 50% reduction in Lequesne index and pain VAS scores encourages the use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Correlation between radiologic and ultrasonographic patterns and clinical manifestations in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis

Increasing amounts of data have recently been published regarding ultrasonographic (US) findings of osteoarthritic joints, but very few data concern hip joints. In the current study we described US patterns concerning 490 patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA) who underwent to intra-articular injections of hyaluronic products under US guidance. All patients were studied by US and X-ray of hip, clinical evaluation was assessed by the followings indexes: Lequesne, pain VAS, ICED, Global Physician Assessment and Global Patient Assessment. US findings were summarized in four main patterns, effusion and synovial proliferation were also detected. The aim of this study was to correlate US findings with clinical assessment and radiographic findings (according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification). Pearson's r correlation coefficient were computed and come out significant and positive between X ray and US patterns and between clinical indexes and US patterns. Also the correlation between K-L score and US patterns showed a significant positive correlation indicating that higher K-L scores are associated with increasing abnormal US findings. Our data suggest that ultrasonography of the hip may give useful information about the state of synovial membrane, synovial fluid, joint margins and bone profile in hip OA. Further studies are needed to evaluate their prevalence in hip OA symptomatic and not-symptomatic patients and their correlation to treatment outcome.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Intra-Articular Administration of Jointex® in Patients Suffering from Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis: An Open, Prospective Study with a 12-Month Follow-up

Hip osteoarthritis represents a statistically relevant problem in clinical practice; previous reports showed different efficacy and safety profiles for intra-articular use of hyaluronic acid in hip osteoarthritis-affected patients, and in this sense, to add evidence to this topic, data regarding safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation are reported in order to establish whether such a therapeutic tool may represent a valid option. This study investigates the safety and efficacy profiles of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections of Jointex® in hip osteoarthritis affected patients. This is a prospective multicentric study carried out in public hospitals. Adult outpatients suffering from symptomatic hip OA (Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 2, 3 or 4) were injected with one syringe of 4 ml (2 vials) of Jointex® under ultrasound guidance, repeated after six months; when clinically necessary an adjunctive injection was performed. Patients' characteristics, such as gender, age, weight, height and BMI, smoking habit, unilateral or bilateral hip OA, radiological grade for hip OA following Kellgren-Lawrence grading and duration of disease, were evaluated. Patients were assessed at baseline and at every control visit and injection time for Lequesne index as primary endpoint, pain (evaluated by VAS) and NSAID consumption (number of days patients assumed NSAID in the last month) both as secondary endpoint. A total of 180 patients entered the study, all of whom received at least one IA US-guided injection of Jointex® into the hip joint. A total of 36 drop outs were registered, and both distribution and causes of drop out were recorded. A total of 389 injections were carried out, as 18 patients were affected by bilateral hip OA and 7 patients affected by monolateral hip OA required one more injection for symptomatic relief in respect to other patients. Scores obtained for primary as well as secondary study endpoints reached statistical significance when compared with scores obtained at baseline visit. Lequesne index mean scores obtained at each control visit, when compared with baseline mean value, were significantly different (p<0.001 for all control visits vs baseline). Similarly, results obtained for secondary endpoints, such as Pain VAS and NSAID consumption, when compared with results obtained at the baseline visit, showed a statistical significance (p<0.001 for all control visits vs baseline). We also evaluated how many patients reached an improvement in Lequesne algo-functional index of at least 70% at 6- and 12-month control visits: a percentage of 21.23% of patients attending the 6-month control visit showed such improvement, while at the 12-month control the percentage was 20%. No local or systemic infectious adverse events were reported during the whole follow-up time. Twenty-seven patients out of 180 reported a transient discomfort in the treated hip for 1–3 days after injection that regressed spontaneously or with paracetamol 1 g two or three times a day. No systemic adverse events were observed. Intra-articular administration of Jointex® in hip OA-affected patients seems to be an efficacious and safe therapeutic option.

A New Chance to Maintain Remission Induced by Anti-TNF Agents in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: CynAR Study II of a 12-Month Follow-up

The advent of biological therapies represented the beginning of a new era in the therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), as demonstrated in several studies, but still many questions about their safety, especially in long term use, and correct administration time remain unanswered. Once remission is achieved, the orientation of clinicians regarding the maintenance of biological therapy or the switch to another immunosuppressive therapy is still uncertain. In our previous study 21 patients affected by RA who reached remission by the use of a combined therapy of anti-TNF drugs and methotrexate (MTX) underwent CyA-MTX combination therapy for maintaining remission state and were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. The present study aims to investigate these data by a longer follow-up (12 months) and on a larger population. Fifty-three RA patients, with a disease duration of less than 3 years and DAS28<3.2 that reached a level of low disease activity within 6–8 months from the beginning of anti-TNF and methotrexate therapy, were enrolled in the study. By the suspension of anti-TNF therapy, patients underwent A-Cyclosporine (2–3 mg/kg/day) and methotrexate (15mg/week) therapy. DAS28, Pain VAS, Erythrosedimentation rate (ESR), C Reactive Protein (CRP) were all tested at time 0 and every 2 months after the interruption of the anti-TNF therapy and the beginning of A-Cyclosporine and methotrexate therapy, as well as liver and kidney profiles. Side effects were also recorded. Of 53 patients, 50 completed the study with a 12-month follow-up. Twenty-one (42%) patients maintained clinical parameters within low disease activity values at 12 months, while 29 (58%) patients showed an increase in DAS28 and other parameters: 16 (32%) patients at the 6-month control, 13 (26%) patients at the 12-month control. Our data show that 42% of the patients undergoing A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate therapy maintained low disease activity parameters of rheumatoid arthritis, obtained after 6–8 months of anti-TNF therapy. Further studies on larger populations are necessary in order to confirm such results and identify predictor factors for different responses.

Hip viscosupplementation under ultra-sound guidance riduces NSAID consumption in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis patients in a long follow-up. Data from Italian registry

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) consumption is strictly related to a high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations in patients with symptomatic hip or knee OA stated that NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose but their long-term use should be avoided if possible. OARSI guidelines for the treatment of the hip OA include the use of viscosupplementation, which aims to restore physiological and rheological features of the synovial fluid.

OBJECTIVE

Aim of this multicentric, open and retrospective study is to investigate if NSAID consumption may be reduced by the use of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of several hyaluronic acid (HA) products in hip joint administered in patients affected by symptomatic hip OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients affected by mono or bilateral symptomatic hip OA according to American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, radiological OA graded II-IV (Kellgren and Lawrence) entered the study and were administered with ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid products. As a primary endpoint, consumption of NSAIDs was evaluated by recording the number of days a month (range 0-30) the patient had used NSAID during the previous month, reported at each visit during the 24 months follow-up period. Secondary endpoints included further analysis for subgroups of patients categorized for Lequesne index score, Kellgren-Lawrence score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ultrasound pattern, age, hyaluronic acid used.

RESULTS

2343 patients entered the study. Regarding primary endpoint, the consumption of NSAIDs was reduced of 48.2% at the third month when compared with baseline values. This sparing effect increased at 12th and 24th month with a reduction respectively of 50% and 61% in comparison to baseline values. These differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These data point out that intraarticular hyaluronan preparations provide OA pain relief and reduce NSAIDs consumption in a large cohort of patients for a long period of follow-up. Multiple courses of viscosupplementation (vs) are required to maintain low dose of NSAID consumption over time. NSAIDs consumption is strictly related to an high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate, instead HA intra-articular treatment is well tolerated and is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects. For these reasons further studies evaluating cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of VS in the management of hip OA are required.

Viscosupplementation in the management of ankle osteoarthritis: a review

INTRODUCTION

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease of synovial joints and is the most common cause of chronic pain. Viscosupplementation (VS) with hyaluronic acid (HA) is largely used for knee osteoarthritis therapy but the evidence for its usefulness in ankle osteoarthritis is limited. The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of viscosupplementation treatment of ankle osteoarthritis in the current literature.

METHODS

The following databases were searched: Medline (period 2006-2008), Database of Abstract on Reviews and Effectiveness and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Reference lists of relevant articles were controlled for additional references. The search terms Review, Viscosupplementation (VS), Osteoarthritis (OA), Hyaluronic acid (HA), Hyaluronan, Sodium hyaluronate, Ankle OA, Ankle joint were used to identify all studies relating to the use of VS therapy for the ankle OA. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed by assigning level of evidence as previously defined by the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM).

RESULT

Seven articles concerning the efficacy of a total of 275 patients undergoing VS treatment for ankle OA were included. One European study, one Taiwanese study, one Italian study, one Turkish study and three American studies with level of evidence ranging from I to IV evaluated the following products: Hyalgan, Synvisc, Supartz, Adant.

CONCLUSION

Viscosupplementation is used widely in knee OA and is included in the professional guidelines for treatment of the disease in this joint. The potential for treating osteoarthritis of the ankle joint by viscosupplementation has been suggested in the literature, however, no dosing studies have been published to date, and dosing in the ankle joint remains an area for discussion. Viscosupplementation could potentially provide an useful alternative in treating such patients with painful ankle OA.

Can Cyclosporine-A associated to methotrexate maintain remission induced by anti-TNF agents in rheumatoid arthritis patients? (Cynar pilot study)

Biological therapies, such as etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab, have demonstrated good efficacy in inducing rheumatoid arthritis to low disease activity levels. Nevertheless, their cost, as well as the related risk of side effects, especially in long-term therapies, are still high. Furthermore, there is a good deal of evidence proving loss of efficacy of such therapies in the long term, often necessitating the shift from one specific anti-TNF biological treatment to another. There are also other open debates on the amount of time a patient should undergo an anti-TNF therapy, on the possibility of inducing a complete remission in early arthritis and, once remission or low disease activity is obtained, on the possibility of interrupting the anti-TNF-based therapy. In this study we investigated whether A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate association may be effective in maintaining low disease activity obtained by anti-TNF therapies. Twenty-three rheumatoid arthritis-affected patients, whose diagnosis was made according to ACR criteria, with a disease duration of less than 3 years, and DAS28<3.2 that reached a level of low disease activity within 6-8 months from beginning anti-TNF and Methotrexate therapy, were enrolled in the study. After the suspension of anti-TNF therapy, patients were started on A-Cyclosporine (2-3 mg/kg/day) and Methotrexate (15mg/week) therapy. DAS28, Pain VAS, Erythrosedimentation Rate (ESR), and C Reactive Protein (CRP) were all tested at time 0 and at 6 months, as well as liver and kidney profiles, after the interruption of the anti-TNF therapy and the beginning of A-Cyclosporine and Methotrexate therapy. Side effects were also recorded. Of 23 patients undergoing the A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate therapy for maintaining low disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis obtained by 6-8 months of anti-TNF therapy, 21 completed the study with a 6 month follow-up. Thirteen patients maintained clinical parameters within low disease activity values, while 8 patients showed an increase in DAS28 and other parameters. Only two patients showed an increase in blood pressure that was diagnosed after two months from the beginning of the A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate therapy. The reduction in the dosage of A-Cyclosporin from 3mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day caused a slow normalization of blood pressure values. Our data seem to suggest that more than half of the patients undergoing A-Cyclosporin and Methotrexate therapy seemed to maintain low disease activity parameters of rheumatoid arthritis, obtained after 6-8 months of anti-TNF therapy. Further studies on larger populations are necessary in order to confirm such results and identify predictor factors for different responses.

A new technical contribution for ultrasound-guided injections of sacro-iliac joints

INTRODUCTION

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) represents a difficult location for local therapies, as intra-articular injections may be hard to execute, especially in particular conditions such as chronic inflammatory diseases. However, in selected patients, local therapies may be considered. Some recent studies demonstrated the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided injection of SIJ, but still a complete explanation and definition of the technique is needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven patients, four males and 3 females, affected by mono or bilateral sacroiliitis entered the study. Each patient received 40 mg of acetonide triamcinolone for each SIJ, intra articular (IA) US-guided injection. The technical originality proposed in this study consists in the spinal needle insertion in the middle of the cranial long side of the linear transducer with an orientation of about 10 degrees, determining shorter needle insertion for reaching joint space and consequently probably granting lesser pain and traumatism for patients.

RESULTS

A total of 22 injections was performed. The longer follow-up time obtained was 18 months in 3 patients. All patients reached at least a 6 month follow-up. All patients reported an amelioration in pain that lasted for at least 6 months. No systemic adverse events were reported or observed. Complete visualization of SIJ and of needle placement was performed by US imaging, while compound proper injection was also visualized by Color-Doppler US imaging.

DISCUSSION

Actually, sacroiliac joint intraarticular injections are often performed under fluoroscopy or Computerized Tomography guidance. Such techniques present several limitations, especially for repeated injections, such as the use of ionizing radiations, the need of a contrast agent and the direct and indirect costs connected. US guidance in IA SIJ injections may represent an easily repeatable imaging technique for needle placement and a precious tool for detecting inflammatory activity of the joint.

Intra-Articular Injections of Infliximab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: Case Reports and Review of Literature

Inflammatory chronic diseases involving joints together with other organs are usually treated with a systemic approach. In a few cases, where arthritis is not responsive to traditional treatments, an intraarticular (I.A.) therapy could be useful. Furthermore, patients not eligible for systemic therapy with anti-TNF or other DMARDs, as well as patients with an initial arthritis with the involvement of a single joint, such as the knee or hip joint, could use the I.A. injection therapy. In this article we report our experience with five patients affected by rheumatic inflammatory diseases, not responding to traditional systemic DMARDs-based therapies or not eligible for systemic use of biological response modifiers who underwent ultrasound-guided I.A. injection of Infliximab. Three of 5 patients showed a positive and long-lasting response to treatment with local Infliximab. Safety profile was good according to literature data. Moreover, in this article we review the literature on this therapeutic approach. This is the first report of I.A. use of Infliximab in the hip joint.

Comparative, double-blind, controlled study of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Hyalubrix) injections versus local anesthetic in osteoarthritis of the hip

INTRODUCTION

Comparison of intra-articular bacterial-derived hyaluronic acid (Hyalubrix) (HA) with local analgesia (mepivacaine) for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip.

METHODS

A pilot prospective, double-blind, 6-month randomized trial of 42 patients with hip OA. HA or mepivacaine was administered twice (once a month) under ultrasound guidance. Efficacy measurements included the Lequesne's algofunctional index, a visual analog scale for pain, concomitant use of analgesia, patient and physician global measurement, and safety.

RESULTS

Patients in the HA group exhibited a significantly reduced Lequesne's algofunctional index 3 and 6 months after treatment (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced visual analog scale pain scores 3 and 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05) compared with the local anesthetic group. All primary and secondary measures were significantly improved versus baseline, but other than the above were not different from each other at 3 or 6 months. Adverse effects were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative study suggests a beneficial effect and safety of intra-articular HA in the management of hip OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN39397064.

Viscosupplementation: a suitable option for hip osteoarthritis in young adults

INTRODUCTION

Young adult hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a noteworthy problem, although rarer than the elderly form of the disease, causing limitations in social and working activities and prospects. Treatment options are scarce and surgical procedures, frequently necessary, imply the major drawback of revising the prostheses periodically, whereas chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) consumption may provoke side effects. To explore alternative options to both surgery and long-term NSAID use, especially in the case of young patients, viscosupplementation seems to appear as an appropriate tool to relieve pain, ameliorate the function and delay surgery.

AIM OF THE STUDY

In this study we tackle the issue of the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) injections in young adults with symptomatic hip OA.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

These data, collected from 78 young patients, show that viscosupplementation is a safe procedure, and may provide significant relief from pain and functional recovery. Larger controlled studies are needed to establish otpimal treatment strategies and clinical factors predictive of treatment response.

Mixed Panniculitis Responding to Cyclosporin-A with a 12-Month Follow-up: A Case Report

Panniculitides represent a heterogeneous group of inflammatory diseases involving subcutaneous fat. Subcutaneous fat is normally organized into adipose cells, adipocytes, and septa of connective tissue. The inflammation involving such tissues can be more represented in septa (septal panniculitis) or in lobules (lobular panniculitis) or be equally distributed in both (mixed panniculitis). A bioptical study is necessary in order to discern between different forms. Vascular involvement is also different in such diseases, as it can interest arteries, or veins, or both. Different grades of fat necrosis can also be observed, such as adipocytes without nuclei, lipophagic necrosis, liquefactive fat necrosis, microcystic fat necrosis, ischaemic fat necrosis. Panniculitis can be idiopathic or secondary to other diseases such as systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic erithematous lupus and many others. Therapies usually vary on the single patient but the general orientation leads to the use of immunosuppressive drugs such as thalidomide, corticosteroids, cyclosporin-A, hydroxychloroquine and cyclophosphamide. We report a case of a 19-year-old female affected by primary mixed panniculitis, associated with fever and deep asthenia, that resolved in a few weeks and was maintained with oral cyclosporin-A.

The Safety of Anti-TNF Agents in the Elderly

Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis are commonly thought of as inflammatory diseases that affect younger individuals. Although the initial presentation of these diseases is common in a patient's twenties or thirties, they usually persist for the duration of the patient's life. In addition, up to one-third of patients with RA have disease onset after 60 years of age. Anti-TNF-a therapies now have well-recognized safety profiles that have been demonstrated in the usual clinical trial populations for these diseases, but such populations under-represent patients > or =65 years of age. This retrospective study aims to determine the safety profiles for etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab in patients of 65 years or more, undergoing anti-TNF treatment for an active inflammatory disease such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or psoriatic arthritis, or skin disease like psoriasis. Our data show that admitting elderly patients into anti-TNF therapeutic regimens is a safe option and that it grants these patients access to the best current therapeutic option, possibly leading to better disease outcome. Quality of life in elderly patients affected by arthritis or psoriasis, often reduced by comorbidities, is as important as quality of life in younger patients. Applying the recommended screening before using biological treatment helps to reduce adverse events related to the therapy, and the application of the same screening in elderly patients seems to lead to comparable results.

Cyclosporine A: good response for patients affected by autoimmune disorders and HCV infection?

INTRODUCTION

In autoimmune disorders (ADs), if Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) is present, immunosuppressive treatment could increase virus replication. Cyclosporine A (CsA), in standard therapeutic doses, has been proven able to inhibit HCV cyclophilin in vitro. Therefore CsA could improve the therapy of HCV patients with ADs.

AIM

In these patients, we started an open pilot study to evaluate the safety of 3 mg/kg CsA and the ability to reduce steroid therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five females and 1 male were recruited; mean age 66 +/- 8 years, mean disease duration 13 +/- 5 years. Three patients are affected by Psoriasic Arthritis, 1 by Rheumatoid Arthritis, 1 by Sjogren Syndrome, and 1 by Myasthenia Gravis. None of them had chronic active hepatitis. HCV genotypes were type 2 (in 3 cases) and type 1 (in 3 cases). Patients were treated with 3 mg/kg of CsA for a period of time ranging from 6 to 12 months. The starting mean dose of prednisone was 12.5 mg/day. Liver function tests were checked monthly and serum HCV-RNA load was checked by RT-PCR before and 2 months into the therapy.

RESULTS

The prednisone dose was reduced from 12.5 mg/day to 7.5 mg/day. The aminotransferases levels were unchanged after 6 months. In patients with low HCV-RNA levels before treatment, no modifications of viral load were observed, whereas patients with increased levels at onset showed mild reduction 2 months into the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppressive treatment of ADs patients with HCV infection can be safely provided with the integration of CsA.

Intra-articular administration of hylan G-F 20 in patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis: tolerability and effectiveness in a large cohort study in clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, observational, open study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hylan G-F 20 in a large cohort of patients with symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA), and identify predictors of clinical response.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients presenting with symptomatic hip OA received one 2 mL intra-articular (IA) injection of hylan G-F 20 under ultrasound guidance. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for a total of 12 months and were offered an optional, additional injection at each follow-up visit if symptomatically justified. At each visit, pain scores (100 mm visual analogue scale [VAS]), Lequesne index scores, NSAID intake, and physician and patient global assessments scores were recorded. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES;

RESULTS

250 patients completed the 12 month follow-up and received a total of 734 injections. Statistically significant reductions in VAS pain scores, Lequesne index scores and NSAID usage were reported at all time-points (p < 0.05). No systemic, serious or severe side effects were observed. Fifty-two local AEs were reported (7.08% per injection) all of which were mild and transient. One predictor of clinical response was identified, with patients < 75 years of age reporting better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in the treatment of symptomatic hip OA. Hylan G-F 20 may also offer economic benefits due to a reduction in NSAID usage and the resultant reduction in management costs of NSAID related side-effects. These data reflect those obtained in previous studies of hylan G-F 20 in patients with knee OA.

Relevance of 99mTc-HYNIC-tir-octreotide scintigraphy in a patient affected by sarcoidosis with lung and joints involvement and secondary Sjogren's syndrome treated with infliximab: case report

We report the case of a 59 years old woman affected by lung and joint sarcoidosis, secondary Sjogren's syndrome refractory to common disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that regressed with infliximab and methotrexate. 99mTc-HYNIC-TOC scintigraphy was useful in diagnosis, choice of treatment and follow-up.

Combined use of teriparatide and TNFalpha blockade: safety

Up to now, there have been no reports about the combined use of Teriparatide and Anti- TNFalpha blockers in patients affected by inflammatory bone diseases and osteoporosis. In this report, we evaluate the safety of the combined therapeutic use of Teriparatide and Anti-TNFalpha drugs in patients with inflammatory arthritis and severe osteoporosis. Six female patients were selected and treated with biological therapy (3 patients with Etanercept, 3 with Infliximab) for arthritis (2 RA, 4 SPA), having suffered at least 2 vertebral fragility fractures. The mean T-score value, tested by DEXA densitometry, was -2.8 SD - diagnostic for osteoporosis according to WHO criteria. All patients were treated with Teraparatide s.c. (20 microg daily), together with 1200 mg of calcium and 800 IU of vitamin D daily. Until the present time, we have observed no side-effects or therapeutic discontinuity. During the 9-month follow-up period, we did not observe any new symptomatic fractures or infections in treated patients, but we found a reduction in parameters indicating inflammation; no differences were found in biochemical parameters.

Multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome in Sjögren's syndrome patients: casual association or related diseases?

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is defined by multiple symptoms, affecting multiple organs, that wax and wane in response to varying chemical exposures at or below previously tolerated levels. Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is a common autoimmune disease affecting 3% of women aged over 55 years. Except for keratoconjunctivitis sicca (which is associated with SS not MCS), systemic features are common between the 2 diseases, leading to considerable morbidity and, occasionally, mortality. The authors report 3 cases of association between SS and MCS. Three women who were diagnosed with SS showed MCS symptoms and also were diagnosed with MCS. Further studies are needed to understand physiopathogenic mechanisms that eventually may be revealed as common to the 2 syndromes.

Osteoporosis and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis of the hand

OBJECTIVE

Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis are two major health problems affecting postmenopausal women. Epidemiological observations seem to demonstrate a possible inverse relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. Erosive osteoarthritis (EOA) of the hand is a destructive form of primary osteoarthritis. This study evaluated bone mineral density and bone metabolism changes in erosive and nonerosive hand osteoarthritis women.

DESIGN

Fifty-five women (mean age, 59 years; body mass index, 23 +/- 1.4 kg/m) who had been postmenopausal for an average of 9 years and who presented with hand osteoarthritis according to American College of Rheumatology criteria were enrolled in the study; 15 women showed clinical and radiological evidence of hand EOA. Twenty women matched for age, age at menopause, and body mass index formed the control group. Bone mineral density (g/cm) was measured at the hip and lumbar spine using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Serum and urinary calcium and phosphate, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, and urinary breakdown products of bone matrix (CrossLaps) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Women with hand EOA had a statistically significant lower T- and Z-score L2-L4 value than non-hand EOA women and controls (P < 0.01). Moreover, postmenopausal women with hand EOA had higher significant percentage of osteoporosis at lumbar spine when compared with non-hand EOA postmenopausal women and controls. Any statistically significant difference in osteocalcin and CrossLaps serum levels was noted among women with hand EOA, hand osteoarthritis, and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that postmenopausal women with clinical and radiological EOA are at risk for development of osteoporosis.

[Intra-articular treatment with Hylan G-F 20 under ultrasound guidance in hip osteoarthritis. Clinical results after 12 months follow-up]

Hip is a site very commonly affected by osteoarthritis (OA), yet few data exist in literature regarding intra-articular use of hyaluronic acid in this pathology. We evaluated the efficacy of Hylan G-F 20 hip viscosupplementation performed under ultrasound guidance. We enrolled 26 patients affected by symptomatic hip OA and treated them with a single intraarticular injection of Hylan G-F 20, which could be repeated every two months. The injection was performed under ultrasound guidance with an antero-superior approach. Treatment efficacy was assessed through Lequesne index, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain quantification, and NSAID intake at the timepoint zero (baseline), and after 2, 6 and 12 months. We observed a statistically significant reduction of all considered parameters at the timepoints 2 and 6 months, when compared to baseline. At 12 months the changes were still statistically significant for all parameters for about 50% of the patients. No side effect was observed, nor systemic complication. Viscosupplementation is a promising approach for hip OA, although further and wider studies are wanted to determine how long the beneficial effect lasts, and what is the optimal number of injections to administer.

[18-month observational study on efficacy of intraarticular hyaluronic acid (Hylan G-F 20) injections under ultrasound guidance in hip osteoarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of viscosupplementation (VS) with hyaluronic acid (Hylan GF 20) in a cohort of 36 patients affected by hip osteoarthritis through a 18 months follow-up.

METHODS

Viscosupplementation was performed with an anteriorsagittal approach, under ultrasound guidance. 36 patients were administered hyaluronic acid intraarticularly in the hip, with a unique injection of Hylan G-F20, which could be repeated after at least 3 months. Treatment efficacy was assessed by functional index WOMAC, pain evaluation on a visual analogue scale and NSAID consumption. All such parameters were recorded at the time of the first injection and then 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months later.

RESULTS

Statistically significant reduction of all parameters was observed three months after the injection, and was still maintained at the timepoints 6, 9, 12 and 18 months. No local side effects have been observed, nor systemic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that viscosupplementation is a promising approach for hip osteoarthritis, providing beneficial effects in a long-term follow up. Yet, the topic deserves further and wider studies, so to define the number of injections to administer and suggest a fit interval between subsequent injections.

TNF-alpha blockade induce clinical remission in patients affected by polymyalgia rheumatica associated to diabetes mellitus and/or osteoporosis: a seven cases report

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the elderly, characterized by aching and morning stiffness in the cervical region, shoulders and pelvic girdles. A steroid treatment course of 6-24 months is often required, but, due to important side effects, it is troublesome if the PMR patient is also affected by diabetes mellitus (DM) and/or osteoporosis. Aim of our study is to test anti-TNF alpha treatment as a steroid sparing tool in PMR patients affected by DM or osteoporosis. In particular, we hypothesise that TNF alpha blockade can be useful not only in remission maintaining, but also in the induction of clinical remission without corticosteroids in this kind of patients. In a six months follow up, patients had clinical improvement, confirmed by physical medical examination, and a statistically significant reduction in ESR and CRP mean values. Anti-TNF alpha treatment was well tolerated by all patients. These preliminary data suggest than Infliximab can be useful in the treatment of PMR patients, not only for steroid sparing purposes, but also as first line therapy in PMR patients with severe comorbidity, such as diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis.