Reduced count pediatric whole-body
18F-FDG PET imaging reconstruction with a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm.
Pediatr Radiol 2024;
54:170-180. [PMID:
37962603 DOI:
10.1007/s00247-023-05801-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Advanced positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction methods promise to allow optimized PET/CT protocols with improved image quality, decreased administered activity and/or acquisition times.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the impact of reducing counts (simulating reduced acquisition time) in block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstructed pediatric whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images, and to compare BSERM with ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstructed reduced-count images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty children (16 male) underwent clinical whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations using a 25-cm axial field-of-view (FOV) digital PET/CT system at 90 s per bed (s/bed) with BSREM reconstruction (β=700). Reduced count simulations with varied BSREM β levels were generated from list-mode data: 60 s/bed, β=800; 50 s/bed, β=900; 40 s/bed, β=1000; and 30 s/bed, β=1300. In addition, a single OSEM reconstruction was created at 60 s/bed based on prior literature. Qualitative (Likert scores) and quantitative (standardized uptake value [SUV]) analyses were performed to evaluate image quality and quantitation across simulated reconstructions.
RESULTS
The mean patient age was 9.0 ± 5.5 (SD) years, mean weight was 38.5 ± 24.5 kg, and mean administered 18F-FDG activity was 4.5 ± 0.7 (SD) MBq/kg. Between BSREM reconstructions, no qualitative measure showed a significant difference versus the 90 s/bed β=700 standard (all P>0.05). SUVmax values for lesions were significantly lower from 90 s/bed, β=700 only at a simulated acquisition time of 30 s/bed, β=1300 (P=0.001). In a side-by-side comparison of BSREM versus OSEM reconstructions, 40 s/bed, β=1000 images were generally preferred over 60 s/bed TOF OSEM images.
CONCLUSION
In children who undergo whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT on a 25-cm FOV digital PET/CT scanner, reductions in acquisition time or, by corollary, administered radiopharmaceutical activity of >50% from a clinical standard of 90 s/bed may be possible while maintaining diagnostic quality when a BSREM reconstruction algorithm is used.
Collapse