Schneppenheim R, Budde U, Beutel K, Hassenpflug WA, Hauch H, Obser T, Oyen F, Schneppenheim S, Schrum J. Response to DDAVP in children with von Willebrand disease type 2.
Hamostaseologie 2009;
29:143-148. [PMID:
19404524]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED
We have prospectively evaluated the biologic response to desmopressin (DDAVP) in 28 children with type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in correlation with the phenotype and the molecular defect of VWF. The diagnosis of VWD type 2 was mainly based on VWF functional parameters and/or an aberrant VWF multimer pattern. Seventeen different mutations were identified (6 of them novel). No response with respect to the functional parameters VWF:RCo and/or VWF:CB was seen in patients with severe abnormality of the VWF multimer pattern. One patient with VWD type 2A phenotype IIC Miami did not respond with respect to VWF:CB, but showed a good response of VWF:Ag and FVIII:C as expected. Interestingly he showed a persistently high level of VWF:Ag and FVIII:C up to 4 hours after DDAVP infusion. Patients with minor alterations of multimer structure and particular mutations responded well to DDAVP, whereas patients with normal multimer structure but a defect in platelet dependent functional parameters did not respond with VWF:RCo.
CONCLUSION
Children with VWD type 2 show a variable response to desmopressin depending on the mutation that correlates with the functional defect and the presence or absence as well as the half-life of large VWF multimers. Our data emphasize the usefulness of DDAVP testing even in patients with VWD type 2, possibly with the exception of VWD type 2B.
Collapse