POS0711 TOLERANCE AND EFFICACY OF TARGETED THERAPIES PRESCRIBED FOR OFF-LABEL INDICATIONS IN REFRACTORY SYSTEMIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES: DATA OF THE FIRST 100 PATIENTS ENROLLED IN THE TATA REGISTRY (TARGETED THERAPY IN AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES)

Background

The low prevalence of systemic autoimmune diseases and the diversity of their clinical manifestations make complex to conduct randomised clinical trials to assess the potential efficacy of targeted treatments.

Objectives

To assess the tolerance and efficacy of targeted therapies prescribed off-label in refractory autoimmune diseases.

Methods

The TATA registry (TArgeted Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases) is a prospective, observational, national and independent cohort follow-up. The inclusion criteria in the registry are as follows: age > 18 years; rare systemic autoimmune disease (systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syndrome, systemic scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, vasculitis) or other refractory rheumatism treated with off-label drugs started after 1st January 2019.

Results

Hundred (100) patients (79 females) were enrolled. The median age was 52.5 years [49;56], the median disease duration before enrolment was 5 years [3;7]. The targeted therapies at enrolment were as follows: JAK/STAT inhibitors (44%), anti-IL6R (22%), anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and anti-IL17 (9%), anti-BAFF (5%), abatacept (5%), other targeted treatments (9%), and combination of targeted treatments (6%). 73% of patients were receiving corticosteroid therapy at enrolment (median dose 10 mg/day). The current median follow-up time is 9 months [8;10].

Safety: 11 serious infections (incidence rate of 14.8 /100 patient-years) and 1 cancer (1.3 cancers/100 patient-years) were observed. Two patients died from severe COVID-19 (2.7 deaths/100 patient-years).

Efficacy: The targeted treatment was considered effective by the clinician in 56% of patients and allowed in responders a median reduction of oral corticosteroids of 15 [9-21] mg/day.

Conclusion

These initial results of the TATA registry confirm the diversity of targeted treatments prescribed off-label in refractory autoimmune diseases and their corticosteroid-sparing effect when effective. Tolerance was acceptable in these refractory patients with a long history of treatment with immunosuppressive drugs.

References

[1]B. Terrier et al., Safety and efficacy of rituximab in systemic lupus erythematosus: results from 136 patients from the French AutoImmunity and Rituximab registry. Arthritis Rheum 62, 2458-2466 (2010).

[2]J. E. Gottenberg et al., Efficacy of rituximab in systemic manifestations of primary Sjogren’s syndrome: results in 78 patients of the AutoImmune and Rituximab registry. Ann Rheum Dis 72, 1026-1031 (2013).

[3]J. E. Gottenberg et al., Risk factors for severe infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab in the autoimmunity and rituximab registry. Arthritis Rheum 62, 2625-2632 (2010).

[4]F. R. S. S. S. C. I. consortium, contributors, Severity of COVID-19 and survival in patients with rheumatic and inflammatory diseases: data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort of 694 patients. Ann Rheum Dis, (2020).

[5]R. Felten et al., B-cell targeted therapy is associated with severe COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory arthritides: a 1-year multicentre study in 1116 successive patients receiving intravenous biologics. Ann Rheum Dis 81, 143-145 (2022).

[6]D. J. Wallace et al., Baricitinib for systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 392, 222-231 (2018).

[7]J. J. Paik et al., Study of Tofacitinib in Refractory Dermatomyositis: An Open-Label Pilot Study of Ten Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol 73, 858-865 (2021).

[8]S. Cole et al., Integrative analysis reveals CD38 as a therapeutic target for plasma cell-rich pre-disease and established rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 20, 85 (2018).

[9]S. J. Bowman et al., Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous ianalumab (VAY736) in patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b dose-finding trial. Lancet 399, 161-171 (2022).

Acknowledgements

French networks (FAI2R, CRI, IMIDIATE, SFR, SNFMI) focused on rare systemic autoimmune diseases contributed this work by the contribution of network-affiliated physicians.

Disclosure of Interests

Jacques-Eric Gottenberg Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Galapagos, Novartis, Lilly Roche Chugai, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: BMS.

Lilly and Pfizer for this register (with no access to data)., Aurore Chaudier: None declared, Yves Allenbach: None declared, Arsene Mekinian: None declared, Zahir Amoura: None declared, Patrice cacoub: None declared, Divi Cornec: None declared, Eric Hachulla: None declared, Pierre Quartier: None declared, isabelle melki: None declared, Christophe Richez: None declared, Raphaèle Seror: None declared, Benjamin Terrier: None declared, Valerie Devauchelle-Pensec: None declared, Julien Henry: None declared, MARC GATFOSSE: None declared, LAURENCE BOUILLET: None declared, Emeline GAIGNEUX: None declared, Vincent ANDRE: None declared, Gildas BAULIER: None declared, Aurélie SAUNIER: None declared, Marie Desmurs: None declared, Antoine POULET: None declared, Mathieu ETE: None declared, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Martin Michaud: None declared, Claire Larroche: None declared, AZEDDINE DELLAL: None declared, Amelie LEURS: None declared, Sebastien Ottaviani: None declared, Hubert NIELLY: None declared, Guillaume VIAL: None declared, Roland JAUSSAUD: None declared, Benedicte ROUVIERE: None declared, Pierre-Yves JEANDEL: None declared, Aurelien GUFFROY: None declared, Anne-Sophie Korganow: None declared, Mathieu JOUVRAY: None declared, alain meyer: None declared, Emmanuel Chatelus: None declared, Christelle Sordet: None declared, Renaud FELTEN: None declared, Jean Sibilia: None declared, Samira AHMED YAHIA: None declared, Jean François Kleinmann: None declared, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB

POS0323 ANTI PM-SCL ASSOCIATED AUTO IMMUNE DISEASES: MULTICENTRIC COHORT OF 128 PATIENTS

Background:

Autoantibodies permit to classify and subgroup connective tissue diseases (CTD) in homogeneous groups of patients in terms of phenotype and prognosis. Anti PM-Scl antibodies have been associated with different CTD categories such as: idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) or undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD).

Objectives:

To determine clinical spectrum of anti-PM-Scl associated disease and if it an homogenous condition.

Methods:

This multicentric (four hospitals) observational and retrospective study included all consecutive patients with positive testing for anti PM-Scl antibodies on immunoblot assay and connective tissue disease (2011 -2020). Epidemiological, biological, clinical and radiological data were collected in standard form as well as patient’s outcome.

Results:

One hundred twenty height patients (female n=96;75%) were included. Median [quartiles] age at diagnosis was 50 [18;84] (IQR) and follow-up duration of 7 [3.75-12] years. Seventy-six (59.3%) patients were simple anti-Pm-Scl positive, and 40.7% were associated with other antibodies: anti-SSA/Ro52 (n=13; 10.92%), SSc associated antibodies (n=21; 16.4%), anti-dsDNA for (n=9; 7%), anti-RNP (n=6; 4.7%) and anti-CCP antibodies (n=6; 4.7%). Most patients had cutaneous involvement (n=106; 83%) with skin thickening (n=47; 36%), mechanics hands (n= 28; 22%), calcinosis (n=26; 20.3%) and subcutaneous edema (n=20; 15.62%). Vascular involvement was frequent with Raynaud phenomenon (n= 89; 69%), telangiectasia (n=36; 28%), skin ulcers (n=27; 21%), pulmonary hypertension (n=8/120; 6.7%) and scleroderma renal crisis (n=2; 1.5%). A majority of patients also displayed an interstitial lung disease (ILD) (n=83; 65.8%); nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (92.7%) and/or organizing pneumonia (25.3%). ILD was characterized by a subacute onset in 37/81 (45.7%); median [quartiles] forced vital capacity (FVC) and total lung capacity (TLC) at diagnosis of 88% [73-105] and 79.5% [68.5-101] respectively. Sixty patients (47%) had muscular sign including myalgia (47%), elevated CPK (n=51; 40%) and muscular weakness (Medical Research Council score <4) (n=19/124;15%). Finally, fifty-three (41.7%) had gastroesophageal reflux. Thirty-nine patients (30.4%) experienced at least one muscular or ILD relapse and 6 (4.84%) died during follow-up (2 breast cancer, 1 pneumonia, 3 unknown etiology). Concerning patients’ prognosis, relapses were associated with skeletal (n=29, 74.4% vs n=32, 35.96%, p < 0.001) or cardiac muscle involvement (n=7, 18.4% vs n=2, 2.5%, p=0.007), and subacute ILD (n=19, 65.5% vs n=18, 34.62%, p= 0.05) with organized pneumonia pattern (n=11, 32.3% vs n=10, 13.9%, p=0.05). Strikingly, ILD occurred mainly in men (90.6% vs 57.2%, p < 0.001) and was associated with anti-Scl-70 positivity (n=14, 16.67% vs 0%, p= 0.01). Muscle involvement was associated arthralgia (n=46, 76.67% vs n=34, 50.75%, p=0.005), respiratory signs at diagnosis: dyspnea NYHA ≥3 (n=46, 75.41% vs n=30, 44.78%, p < 0.001), sub-acute ILD (n=24, 61.54% vs n=13, 30.95%, p=0.0111) with lower FVC (73% [64;88] vs 98 [76;105], p < 0.001). Ulcers were associated with Anti-Scl70 positivity (n=9, 33.33% vs n=5, 4.95%, p < 0.001), Raynaud phenomenon (n=27, 100% vs n=62, 61.39%, p < 0.001), digestive involvement (n=20, 74.07% vs n=34, 33.66%, p < 0.001), ILD with chronic onset (n=15, 78.95% vs n=29, 46.77%, p=0.027) and increased incidence of deaths (n=4, 16% vs n=2, 2.02%, p= 0.01).

Conclusion:

Conducted on the largest cohort of Anti-PM-Scl patients, this study highlights two main phenotypes that determine different outcome and prognosis. One was associated with muscular disease and subacute onset ILD with more frequent relapses. The second with a vascular phenotype associated with chronic ILD, digestive involvement, chronic evolution and increased incidence of death. This could lead to a reclassification of PM-Scl associated auto immune diseases.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

IVIg increases interleukin-11 levels, which in turn contribute to increased platelets, VWF and FVIII in mice and humans

The mechanisms of action of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in autoimmune diseases are not fully understood. The fixed duration of efficacy and noncumulative effects of IVIg in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) and acquired von Willebrand disease (AVWD) suggest other mechanisms besides immunological ones. Additionally to the peripheral destruction of platelets in ITP, their medullary hypoproduction emerged as a new paradigm with rescue of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA). In an ITP mouse model, interleukin (IL)-11 blood levels increase following IVIg. IL-11 stimulates the production of platelets and other haemostasis factors; recombinant IL-11 (rIL-11) is thus used as a growth factor in post-chemotherapy thrombocytopenia. We therefore hypothesized that IVIg induces IL-11 over-production, which increases platelets, VWF and factor VIII (FVIII) levels in humans and mice. First, in an ITP mouse model, we show that IVIg or rIL-11 induces a rapid increase (72 h) in platelets, FVIII and VWF levels, whereas anti-IL-11 antibody greatly decreased this effect. Secondly, we quantify for the first time in patients with ITP, AVWD, inflammatory myopathies or Guillain-Barré syndrome the dramatic IL-11 increase following IVIg, regardless of the disease. As observed in mice, platelets, VWF and FVIII levels increased following IVIg. The late evolution (4 weeks) of post-IVIg IL-11 levels overlapped with those of VWF and platelets. These data may explain thrombotic events following IVIg and open perspectives to monitor post-IVIg IL-11/thrombopoietin ratios, and to assess rIL-11 use with or without TPO-RA as megakaryopoiesis co-stimulating factors to overcome the relative hypoproduction of platelets or VWF in corresponding autoimmune diseases, besides immunosuppressant.

T1 mapping-derived signature of myocardial involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy compared to acute viral myocarditis: a texture-based analysis

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background. Recent studies revealed the ability of MRI T1 mapping to characterize myocardial involvement in both idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and acute viral myocarditis (AVM), as compared to healthy controls. However, neither myocardial T1 nor T2 maps were able to discriminate between IIM and AVM patients, when considering conventional myocardial mean values and derived indices such as lambda and extracellular volume.

Purpose. To investigate the ability of T1 mapping-derived texture analysis to differentiate IIM from AVM.

Methods. Forty patients, 20 with IIM (51 ± 17 years, 9 men) and 20 with AVM (34 ± 13 years, 16 men) underwent 1.5T MRI T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery sequence before and 15 minutes after injection of a gadolinium contrast agent. After manual delineation of endocardial and epicardial borders and co-registration of all inversion time images, native and post-contrast T1 maps were estimated. Myocardial texture analysis was performed on native T1 maps. Textural features such as: autocorrelation, contrast, dissimilarity, energy and sum entropy were used to build a least squares-based linear regression model. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to investigate the ability of such texture features score to classify IIM vs. AVM patients, compared to the performance of mean myocardial T1. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was also used to test difference significance between groups.

Results. Both native and post-contrast mean myocardial T1 values were comparable between IIM (native: 1022 ± 43 ms; post-contrast: 319 ± 44 ms) and AVM (1056 ± 59 ms, p = 0.07; 318 ± 35 ms, p = 0.90, respectively) groups. Results of ROC analyses are provided in the Table, indicating that a better discrimination between IIM and AVM patients was obtained when using texture features, with higher AUC and accuracy than mean T1 values (Figure).

Conclusion. Texture analysis derived from MRI T1 maps without contrast agent injection was able to discriminate between IIM and AVM with higher accuracy, sensitivity and specificity than conventional T1 indices. Such analysis could provide a useful myocardial signature to help diagnose and manage cardiac alterations associated with IIM in patients presenting with myocarditis and primarily suspected of AVM.

Table Area under curve (AUC) Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity Native T1 0.67 0.70 0.65 0.75 Post-contrast T1 0.49 0.60 0.25 0.95 Texture features score 0.85 0.82 0.90 0.75 ROC analyses for classification between IIM and AVM patients Abstract Figure

[Myositis: From classification to diagnosis]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or IIM, are a group of acquired diseases that affect the muscle to a certain extent, and may also affect other organs. They include dermatomyositis, which can affect the muscle eventualy, with a typical skin rash; inclusion body myositis, with a purely muscular expression resulting in a slow progressive deficit; and the former group of "polymyositis", a misnomer that actually includes other categories of IIM, such as immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies, with a severe muscle involvement often presents from the onset of the disease; antisynthetase syndrome, which combines muscle damage, joint involvement and a potentially life-threatening lung disease; and overlapping myositis, which combines muscle damage with other organs involvement connected to another autoimmune disease. The diagnosis of IIM is based on rigorous clinical examination and interrogation, electromyographic data and immunological testing for myositis specific antibodies. This antibody dosage must be extended or repeated if necessary to classify correctly the muscle disease under investigation, as the available tests may not perform well enough. Muscle biopsy, although very informative, is not anymore systematically recommended when the clinic and the antibodies are typical. However, some forms of IIM are sometimes difficult to classify; in these cases, muscle biopsy plays a crucial role in the precise etiological diagnosis.

Diagnostic potential of sarcoplasmic myxovirus resistance protein A expression in subsets of dermatomyositis

AIMS

To elucidate the diagnostic value of sarcoplasmic expression of myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) for dermatomyositis (DM) specifically analysing different DM subforms, and to test the superiority of MxA to other markers.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for MxA and retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) was performed on skeletal muscle samples and compared with the item presence of perifascicular atrophy (PFA) in 57 DM patients with anti-Mi-2 (n = 6), -transcription intermediary factor 1 gamma (n = 10), -nuclear matrix protein 2 (n = 13), -melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) (n = 10) or -small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (n = 1) autoantibodies and with no detectable autoantibody (n = 17). Among the patients, nine suffered from cancer and 22 were juvenile-onset type. Disease controls included antisynthetase syndrome (ASS)-associated myositis (n = 30), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (n = 9) and inclusion body myositis (n = 5).

RESULTS

Sarcoplasmic MxA expression featured 77% sensitivity and 100% specificity for overall DM patients, while RIG-I staining and PFA reached respectively 14% and 59% sensitivity and 100% and 86% specificity. In any subset of DM, sarcoplasmic MxA expression showed higher sensitivity than RIG-I and PFA. Some anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM samples distinctively showed a scattered staining pattern of MxA. No ASS samples had sarcoplasmic MxA expression even though six patients had DM skin rash.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcoplasmic MxA expression is more sensitive than PFA and RIG-I expression for a pathological diagnosis of DM, regardless of the autoantibody-related subgroup. In light of its high sensitivity and specificity, it may be considered a pathological hallmark of DM per se. Also, lack of MxA expression in ASS supports the idea that ASS is a distinct entity from DM.

[Focal myositis: An unknown disease]

Focal myositis are inflammatory muscle diseases of unknown origin. At the opposite from the other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, they are restricted to a single muscle or to a muscle group. They are not associated with extramuscular manifestations, and they have a good prognosis without any treatment. They are characterized by a localized swelling affecting mostly lower limbs. The pseudo-tumor can be painful, but is not associated with a muscle weakness. Creatine kinase level is normal. Muscle MRI shows an inflammation restricted to a muscle or a muscle group. Muscle biopsy and pathological analysis remain necessary for the diagnosis, showing inflammatory infiltrates composed by macrophages and lymphocytes without any specific distribution within the muscle. Focal overexpression of HLA-1 by the muscle fibers is frequently observed. The muscle biopsy permits to rule out differential diagnosis such a malignancy (sarcoma). Spontaneous remission occurs within weeks or months after the first symptoms, relapse is unusual.