A Prospective Trial of Single-Fraction Radiation to the Tumor Bed with a Novel Breast-Specific Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Device: The GammaPod

Purpose

Radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer is typically delivered in a hypofractionated regimen to the whole breast followed by a tumor bed boost. This results in a treatment course of approximately 4 weeks. In this study, the tumor bed boost was delivered in a single fraction as part of a safety and feasibility study for FDA clearance of the device.

Methods and Materials

Eligible women with early-stage breast cancer underwent lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy. Patients underwent breast immobilization using a system specific to the GammaPod followed by CT simulation, boost treatment planning, and boost treatment delivery all in a single treatment day. Patients then started whole-breast radiation therapy within 1 week of the boost treatment. Patients and treatments were assessed for safety and feasibility. Acute toxicities were recorded.

Results

A single-fraction boost of 8 Gy was delivered to the tumor bed before a course of whole-breast radiation. The GammaPod treatment was successfully delivered to 14 of 17 enrolled patients. Acute toxicities from all radiation therapy, inclusive of the boost and whole-breast radiation, were limited to grade 1 events.

Conclusions

The GammaPod device successfully delivered a single-fraction boost treatment to the tumor bed with no change in expected acute toxicities. The results of this study led to FDA clearance of the device through the Investigational Device Exemption process at the FDA. The GammaPod is in clinical use at 4e institutions nationally and internationally, with additional sites pending in 2023.

Development and validation of a comprehensive patient-specific quality assurance program for a novel stereotactic radiation delivery system for breast lesions

PURPOSE

The GammaPod is a dedicated prone breast stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) machine composed of 25 cobalt-60 sources which rotate around the breast to create highly conformal dose distributions for boosts, partial-breast irradiation, or neo-adjuvant SRS. We describe the development and validation of a patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) system for the GammaPod.

METHODS

We present two PSQA methods: measurement based and calculation based PSQA. The measurements are performed with a combination of absolute and relative dose measurements. Absolute dosimetry is performed in a single point using a 0.053-cc pinpoint ionization chamber in the center of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) breast phantom and a water-filled breast cup. Relative dose distributions are verified with EBT3 film in the PMMA phantom. The calculation-based method verifies point doses with a novel semi-empirical independent-calculation software.

RESULTS

The average (± standard deviation) breast and target sizes were 1263 ± 335.3 cc and 66.9 ± 29.9 cc, respectively. All ion chamber measurements performed in water and the PMMA phantom agreed with the treatment planning system (TPS) within 2.7%, with average (max) difference of -1.3% (-1.9%) and -1.3% (-2.7%), respectively. Relative dose distributions measured by film showed an average gamma pass rate of 97.0 ± 3.2 when using a 3%/1 mm criteria. The lowest gamma analysis pass rate was 90.0%. The independent calculation software had average agreements (max) with the patient and QA plan calculation of 0.2% (2.2%) and -0.1% (2.0%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We successfully implemented the first GammaPod PSQA program. These results show that the GammaPod can be used to calculate and deliver the predicted dose precisely and accurately. For routine PSQA performed prior to treatments, the independent calculation is recommended as it verifies the accuracy of the planned dose without increasing the risk of losing vacuum due to prolonged waiting times.

Abstract OT2-03-03: Delivery of a single fraction lumpectomy cavity boost using a novel immobilization device and treatment delivery system

Background: The lumpectomy cavity (LPC) boost has been shown in 2 randomized studies to improve local control in breast cancer. Hypofraction is now being used for delivery of the LPC boost in some early-stage patients. This trial delivers the LPC boost in a single fraction using a novel breast immobilization device/treatment delivery system.

Trial design: Patients are enrolled in this trial after standard resection with lumpectomy/sentinel lymph node biopsy (as appropriate) and chemotherapy (as indicated per standard of care). At the time of CT simulation for whole-breast radiation therapy (RT), the radiation oncologist evaluates breast size and LPC position. If consented for treatment, the patient receives a single fraction “boost” treatment of 8 Gy in 1 fraction followed by standard whole-breast RT to start within 7 days of completion of the boost. Whole-breast radiation is delivered in the supine or prone position with the following fractionation schemes: 4005 cGy in 15 fractions or 5000 cGy in 25 fractions.

On the day of the boost treatment, the patient is fitted with the breast immobilization device, with a plastic inner cup that is fitted so that the breast fills all or most of the cup. A rigid outer cup with a built-in stereotactic fiducial system is attached. Moderate negative pressure is applied to immobilize the breast within the cup system. Patients then undergo CT simulation in the prone position. Clip placement and LPC cavity location must meet eligibility criteria before proceeding with treatment planning and delivery.

Eligibility criteria:

Eligibility criteria: age >60 yo; female only; dx of invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ; estrogen receptor positive; successful completion of lumpectomy ± sentinel lymph node biopsy with negative margins for invasive or noninvasive cancer; greatest tumor dimension <4 cm before surgery; weight <330 lb; height <76 inches; nonlactating and nonpregnant. Various additional dosimetric factors must be met prior to treatment. If these are unable to be met, the patient will become ineligible for treatment.

Specific aims: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of delivering the LPC boost RT using a single fraction with a novel immobilization device/treatment delivery system while ensuring coverage of the target volume with appropriate dose homogeneity and conformity. Secondary aims are evaluation of patient comfort, acute toxicity (1 month), and late toxicity (1 year).

Statistical methods: A Simon 2-stage design is utilized for this trial. After evaluating the device and treatment on 8 patients in the first stage, the trial was designed to be terminated and device rejected if the dose distribution was acceptable for ≤5 patients. The first stage was completed in spring 2017 and progressed to the second stage, designed to include a total of 17 patients.

Accrual and target accrual: Target accrual for this study is 14 patients successfully treated while meeting all protocol constraints. As of 6/2017, 16 patients have been enrolled, of whom 13 have been successfully treated while meeting all protocol constraints.

Citation Format: Nichols EM, Becker S, Hong J, Cohen RJ, Mishra MV, Citron W, Cheston SB, Niu Y, Mutaf Y, Yu CX, Feigenberg SJ. Delivery of a single fraction lumpectomy cavity boost using a novel immobilization device and treatment delivery system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-03.

Projected Improvements in Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using a Novel Breast Stereotactic Radiotherapy Device: A Dosimetric Analysis

Accelerated partial breast irradiation has caused higher than expected rates of poor cosmesis. At our institution, a novel breast stereotactic radiotherapy device has demonstrated dosimetric distributions similar to those in brachytherapy. This study analyzed comparative dose distributions achieved with the device and intensity-modulated radiation therapy accelerated partial breast irradiation. Nine patients underwent computed tomography simulation in the prone position using device-specific immobilization on an institutional review board–approved protocol. Accelerated partial breast irradiation target volumes (planning target volume_10mm) were created per the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-39 protocol. Additional breast stereotactic radiotherapy volumes using smaller margins (planning target volume_3mm) were created based on improved immobilization. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and breast stereotactic radiotherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation plans were separately generated for appropriate volumes. Plans were evaluated based on established dosimetric surrogates of poor cosmetic outcomes. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were utilized to contrast volumes of critical structures receiving a percentage of total dose (Vx). The breast stereotactic radiotherapy device consistently reduced dose to all normal structures with equivalent target coverage. The ipsilateral breast V20-100 was significantly reduced (P < .05) using planning target volume_10mm, with substantial further reductions when targeting planning target volume_3mm. Doses to the chest wall, ipsilateral lung, and breast skin were also significantly lessened. The breast stereotactic radiotherapy device’s uniform dosimetric improvements over intensity-modulated accelerated partial breast irradiation in this series indicate a potential to improve outcomes. Clinical trials investigating this benefit have begun accrual.

Feasibility of CBCT-based dose with a patient-specific stepwise HU-to-density curve to determine time of replanning

Purpose

(a) To investigate the accuracy of cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT)–derived dose distributions relative to fanbeam–based simulation CT‐derived dose distributions; and (b) to study the feasibility of CBCT dosimetry for guiding the appropriateness of replanning.

Methods and materials

Image data corresponding to 40 patients (10 head and neck [HN], 10 lung, 10 pancreas, 10 pelvis) who underwent radiation therapy were randomly selected. Each patient had both intensity‐modulated radiation therapy and volumetric‐modulated arc therapy plans; these 80 plans were subsequently recomputed on the CBCT images using a patient‐specific stepwise curve (Hounsfield units‐to‐density). Planning target volumes (PTVs; D98%, D95%, D2%), mean dose, and V95% were compared between simulation‐CT–derived treatment plans and CBCT‐based plans. Gamma analyses were performed using criterion of 3%/3 mm for three dose zones (>90%, 70%~90%, and 30%~70% of maximum dose). CBCT‐derived doses were then used to evaluate the appropriateness of replanning decisions in 12 additional HN patients whose plans were previously revised during radiation therapy because of anatomic changes; replanning in these cases was guided by the conventional observed source‐to‐skin‐distance change‐derived approach.

Results

For all disease sites, the difference in PTV mean dose was 0.1% ± 1.1%, D2% was 0.7% ± 0.1%, D95% was 0.2% ± 1.1%, D98% was 0.2% ± 1.0%, and V95% was 0.3% ± 0.8%; For 3D dose comparison, 99.0% ± 1.9%, 97.6% ± 4.4%, and 95.3% ± 6.0% of points passed the 3%/3 mm criterion of gamma analysis in high‐, medium‐, and low‐dose zones, respectively. The CBCT images achieved comparable dose distributions. In the 12 previously replanned 12 HN patients, CBCT‐based dose predicted well changes in PTV D2% (Pearson linear correlation coefficient = 0.93; P < 0.001). If 3% of change is used as the replanning criteria, 7/12 patients could avoid replanning.

Conclusions

CBCT‐based dose calculations produced accuracy comparable to that of simulation CT. CBCT‐based dosimetry can guide the decision to replan during the course of treatment.

Dosimetric Improvements with a Novel Breast Stereotactic Radiotherapy Device for Delivery of Preoperative Partial-Breast Irradiation

OBJECTIVE

Partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with external-beam radiotherapy has produced higher than expected rates of fair-to-poor cosmesis. Worsened outcomes have been correlated with larger volumes of breast tissue exposed to radiation. A novel breast-specific stereotactic radiotherapy (BSRT) device (BSRTD) has been developed at our institution and has shown promise in delivering highly conformal dose distributions. We compared normal tissue sparing with this device with that achieved with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)-PBI.

METHODS

Fifteen women previously treated with breast conservation therapy were enrolled on an institutional review board-approved protocol. Each of them underwent CT simulation in the prone position using the BSRTD-specific immobilization system. Simulated postoperative and preoperative treatment volumes were generated based on surgical bed/clip position. Blinded planners generated IMRT-PBI plans and BSRT plans for each set of volumes. These plans were compared based on clinically validated markers for cosmetic outcome and toxicity using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

RESULTS

The BSRT plans consistently reduced the volumes receiving each of several dose levels (Vx) to breast tissue, the chest wall, the lung, the heart, and the skin in both preoperative and postoperative settings (p < 0.05). Preoperative BSRT yielded particularly dramatic improvements.

CONCLUSION

The novel BSRTD has demonstrated significant dosimetric benefits over IMRT-PBI. Further investigation is currently proceeding through initial clinical trials.

SU-E-J-207: Compensation of Target Distortion of Pancreatic Tumor in Free-Breathing CT Using 4D Contour Propagation

PURPOSE

Due to lack of soft-tissue contrast, target distortion for the upper-abdomen targets such as pancreatic tumors is complicated and requiring sufficient remedy. By applying automatic contour propagation, the authors use the information obtained from 4D CT to test if the deformable image registration compensates the respiration-induced distortion of pancreatic tumor in free breathing (FB) CT images.

METHODS

Ten patients with unresected pancreatic cancer treated with either preoperative or definitive chemoradiation were studied. Pancreas GTVs were delineated on the FB CT. Using deformable image registration, the FB GTV contours were propagated to each phase of the 4D CT images taken right after the FB CT, and were compared with the FB GTV to see difference in tumor volume and tumor size along individual dimensions. A one-dimensional tumor motion in proportion to cos4(ωt) was simulated to calculate the probability distribution function for different magnitude of distortions during FB CT scans, and a binary classification test was conducted to analyze the observed results.

RESULTS

The probability distribution function predicted that four out of the ten cases would have substantial target distortion given the variation in target motion amplitudes. Three of these four cases show substantial difference in the superior-inferior size of FB GTV compared to the average 4D GTV, taking into account the uncertainties caused by motions perpendicular to the scanning axis and resolution of the CT scanner. The binary classification test yielded a precision of 75% and an accuracy of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic GTV distorted due to respiration-induced tumor motion is effectively compensated by contour propagation from free-breathing CT to 4D CT using DIR. Union of GTVs of all breathing phases or IGTV can be genreated from 4D set of GTVs propagated from that of free breathing. This study is partially supported by NIH grant 1R01CA133539-01A2. I do not have conflict of interest.

Risk of breast fibrosis following irradiation using a breast-specific SBRT system compared with conventional APBI

116

Background: To determine the dosimetric characteristics and risk of breast fibrosis using a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model in conjunction with a novel preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy system called the GammaPod. Results are compared with linac based post-lumpectomy APBI plans for the same cohort.

Methods: The GammaPod breast SBRT system consists of a Co-60 irradiation unit in combination with an immobilization device with embedded fiducials. Eight patients were enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol and underwent CT scans in the prone position with breast immobilization. A preoperative target (GTV) was synthesized to match the tumor location and volume reported in imaging studies obtained prior to surgery (0.3-2.4 cc). The GTV was expanded by 1.5 cm to create a CTV, and a PTV was created using an additional 0.3 cm margin. The PTV was prescribed 25.5 Gy in 3 fx, which is radiobiologically equivalent to conventional APBI doses of 38.5 Gy in 10 fx. Following the radioablative experience in NSCLC, we also planned to deliver 60.0 Gy to the GTV+0.3 cm as a simultaneous boost in conjunction with the 25.5 Gy PTV prescription dose. For comparison, linac-based treatment plans were created for the same cohort following NSABP B-39 guidelines. Whole breast dosimetry was analyzed in terms of biologically equivalent dose (BED) and Lyman NTCP analysis was performed.

Results: The volume of ipsilateral breast receiving 10, 20, 50, and 100% of the prescribed dose was substantially smaller in GammaPod vs. APBI plans, with cohort averages of 19.3, 13.0, 7.1 and 4.0% vs. 75.8, 67.3, 48.1 and 27.6% respectively (p<0.001). Even though the PTV equivalent uniform BED (EUD) was substantially higher in GammaPod plans (87.9 Gy vs. 57.3 Gy), the ipsilateral breast EUD was still smaller in these plans, 18.9 ± 5.0 Gy vs. 47.2 ± 3.2 Gy (p<0.001). Corresponding NTCP predictions for breast fibrosis rates following GammaPod and APBI treatments were 0.2 ± 0.1% vs. 2.8 ± 0.8% (p<0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: The GammaPod system improves upon traditional post-lumpectomy linac-based APBI by decreasing dose to the ipsilateral breast as well as the predicted rates of breast fibrosis.