Serological response and breakthrough infection after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cirrhosis and post-liver transplant

BACKGROUND

Vaccine hesitancy and lack of access remain major issues in disseminating COVID-19 vaccination to liver patients globally. Factors predicting poor response to vaccination and risk of breakthrough infection are important data to target booster vaccine programs. The primary aim of the current study was to measure humoral responses to 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary aims included the determination of factors predicting breakthrough infection.

METHODS

COVID-19 vaccination and Biomarkers in cirrhosis And post-Liver Transplantation is a prospective, multicenter, observational case-control study. Participants were recruited at 4-10 weeks following first and second vaccine doses in cirrhosis [n = 325; 94% messenger RNA (mRNA) and 6% viral vaccine], autoimmune liver disease (AILD) (n = 120; 77% mRNA and 23% viral vaccine), post-liver transplant (LT) (n = 146; 96% mRNA and 3% viral vaccine), and healthy controls (n = 51; 72% mRNA, 24% viral and 4% heterologous combination). Serological end points were measured, and data regarding breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected.

RESULTS

After adjusting by age, sex, and time of sample collection, anti-Spike IgG levels were the lowest in post-LT patients compared to cirrhosis (p < 0.0001), AILD (p < 0.0001), and control (p = 0.002). Factors predicting reduced responses included older age, Child-Turcotte-Pugh B/C, and elevated IL-6 in cirrhosis; non-mRNA vaccine in AILD; and coronary artery disease, use of mycophenolate and dysregulated B-call activating factor, and lymphotoxin-α levels in LT. Incident infection occurred in 6.6%, 10.6%, 7.4%, and 15.6% of cirrhosis, AILD, post-LT, and control, respectively. The only independent factor predicting infection in cirrhosis was low albumin level.

CONCLUSIONS

LT patients present the lowest response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In cirrhosis, the reduced response is associated with older age, stage of liver disease and systemic inflammation, and breakthrough infection with low albumin level.

Plasma ammonia levels predict hospitalisation with liver-related complications and mortality in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hyperammonaemia is central in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. It also has pleiotropic deleterious effects on several organ systems, such as immune function, sarcopenia, energy metabolism and portal hypertension. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that severity of hyperammonaemia is a risk factor for liver-related complications in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

We studied 754 clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis from 3 independent liver units. Baseline ammonia levels were corrected to the upper limit of normal (AMM-ULN) for the reference laboratory. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation with liver-related complications (a composite endpoint of bacterial infection, variceal bleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, or new onset or worsening of ascites). Multivariable competing risk frailty analyses using fast unified random forests were performed to predict complications and mortality. External validation was carried out using prospective data from 130 patients with cirrhosis in an independent tertiary liver centre.

RESULTS

Overall, 260 (35%) patients were hospitalised with liver-related complications. On multivariable analysis, AMM-ULN was an independent predictor of both liver-related complications (hazard ratio 2.13; 95% CI 1.89-2.40; p <0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.45; 95% CI 1.20-1.76; p <0.001). The AUROC of AMM-ULN was 77.9% for 1-year liver-related complications, which is higher than traditional severity scores. Statistical differences in survival were found between high and low levels of AMM-ULN both for complications and mortality (p <0.001) using 1.4 as the optimal cut-off from the training set. AMM-ULN remained a key variable for the prediction of complications within the random forests model in the derivation cohort and upon external validation.

CONCLUSION

Ammonia is an independent predictor of hospitalisation with liver-related complications and mortality in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis and performs better than traditional prognostic scores in predicting complications.

LAY SUMMARY

We conducted a prospective cohort study evaluating the association of blood ammonia levels with the risk of adverse outcomes in 754 patients with stable cirrhosis across 3 independent liver units. We found that ammonia is a key determinant that helps to predict which patients will be hospitalised, develop liver-related complications and die; this was confirmed in an independent cohort of patients.

Long non-coding RNA H19 as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver cancer stem cells (CSCs) could be involved in the carcinogenesis, recurrence, metastasis and chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to explore the role of lncRNA-H19 as a biomarker for liver cancer.

METHODS

LncRNA-H19 expression levels and the functional assays were conducted in EpCAM⁺ CD133⁺ CSCs and C57BL/6J mice fed with a high-fat high-cholesterol carbohydrate (HFHCC) or standard diet for 52 weeks. Liver tissue and plasma samples from patients with cirrhosis, with or without HCC, were used for the analyses of gene expression and circulating lncRNA-H19 levels in an estimation and validation cohort.

RESULTS

EpCAM⁺ CD133⁺ cells showed a stem cell-like phenotype, self-renewal capacity, upregulation of pluripotent gene expression and overexpressed lncRNA-H19 (p < .001). Suppression of lncRNA-H19 by antisense oligonucleotide treatment significantly reduced the self-renewal capacity (p < .001). EpCAM, CD133 and lncRNA-h19 expression increased accordingly with disease progression in HFHCC-fed mice (p < .05) and also in liver tissue from HCC patients (p = .0082). Circulating lncRNA-H19 levels were significantly increased in HCC patients in both cohorts (p = .013; p < .0001). In addition, lncRNA-H19 levels increased accordingly with BCLC staging (p < .0001) and decreased after a partial and complete therapeutic response (p < .05). In addition, patients with cirrhosis who developed HCC during follow-up showed higher lncRNA-H19 levels (p = .0025).

CONCLUSION

LncRNA-H19 expression was increased in CSCs, in liver tissue and plasma of patients with HCC and decreased after partial/complete therapeutic response. Those patients who developed HCC during the follow-up showed higher levels of lncRNA-H19. LncRNA-H19 could constitute a new biomarker of HCC.

Tacrolimus as an Effective and Durable Second-Line Treatment for Chronic Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Multicentric Study

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease able to progress to acute liver failure, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. A significant proportion of patients fail to first-line therapy or develop severe toxicity.

AIMS

To assess safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus as a second-line therapy in AIH patients.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective study of AIH patients treated with tacrolimus for at least 3 months as a second-line therapy. Effectiveness was defined as complete normalization of transaminases and IgG.

RESULTS

A total of 23 AIH patients were included in the final analysis. In 13% of patients tacrolimus was initiated because of toxicity to previous first-line treatments and the rest were switched because of previous non-efficacy. Tacrolimus was effective in 18 patients (78%; 95%CI: 55.20-91.92%). The median time receiving tacrolimus was 16 months (IQR 20). There was a sustained response with a significant improvement in all liver enzymes and IgG on last follow-up. Only one patient discontinued tacrolimus at the third month because of severe neuropathy, and ototoxicity. Responders were significantly older at diagnosis of AIH (41 ± 13 vs. 27 ± 10 years old; p = 0.0496).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is effective and well tolerated as a second-line therapy in patients with AIH.

International and multicenter real-world study of sorafenib-treated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma under dialysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Information on safety and efficacy of systemic treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) under dialysis are limited due to patient exclusion from clinical trials. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the rate, prevalence, tolerability, and outcome of sorafenib in this population.

METHODS

We report a multicenter study comprising patients from Latin America and Europe. Patients treated with sorafenib were enrolled; demographics, dose modifications, adverse events (AEs), treatment duration, and outcome of patients undergoing dialysis were recorded.

RESULTS

As of March 2018, 6156 HCC patients were treated in 44 centres and 22 patients were concomitantly under dialysis (0.36%). The median age was 65.5 years, 40.9% had hepatitis C, 75% had Child-Pugh A, and 85% were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-C. The median time to first dose modification, treatment duration and overall survival rate were 2.4 months (interquartile ranges [IQR], 0.8-3.8), 10.8 months (IQR, 4.5-16.9), and 17.5 months (95% CI, 7.2-24.5), respectively. Seventeen patients required at least 1 dose modification. The main causes of first dose modification were asthenia/worsening of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status and diarrhoea. At the time of death or last follow-up, four patients were still on treatment and 18 had discontinued sorafenib: 14 were due to tumour progression, 2 were sorafenib-related, and 2 were non-sorafenib-related AE.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes observed in this cohort seem comparable to those in the non-dialysis population. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, this is the largest and most informative dataset regarding systemic treatment outcomes in HCC patients undergoing dialysis.

Analysis of the burden and variability in the management of NAFLD patients in the clinical practice: unifying the required criteria

AIM

to assess the prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic and describe the use of the resources accordingly.

METHODS

a prospective and observational study of 403 patients seen in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic to rule out liver disease during three randomized months in 2016. The overall prevalence of NAFLD, disease severity, heterogeneity of the final diagnosis, the use of medical resources and their respective cost were analyzed.

RESULTS

the main reason for consultation was hypertransaminasemia (42.9%, 173/403), followed by hepatitis C virus (HCV) (28.5%, 115/403). NAFLD was identified as the definitive diagnosis in 29.8% (120/403) of the cohort, 69.2% (83/120) derived by hypertransaminasemia and 24.2% (29/120) by steatosis. Laboratory tests were performed in 96.7% (116/120), abdominal ultrasound in 88.3% (106/120), viral serology in 79.2% (95/120) and autoimmunity in 70% (84/120) of patients with NAFLD. Liver fibrosis was not assessed in 87.5% of cases. In a post-hoc analysis, 12.1% (17/120) had advanced fibrosis by FIB-4. On ultrasound, 65% (73/106) had hepatic steatosis and 15% (17/106) chronic liver disease (significant fibrosis). The mean time for diagnosis was 2.23 ± 0.8 visits. The terminology used to define the clinical diagnosis was heterogeneous as follows: a) 48.3% (58/120) hepatic steatosis; b) 15% (18/120) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; c) 15.8% (19/120) fatty liver; d) 13.3% (16/120) metabolic syndrome; and e) 7.5% (9/120) dual liver disease (fatty liver and alcohol). A pharmacological intervention was performed in six patients, a liver biopsy in two patients and another six were referred to another specialist. The average cost per patient until diagnosis was €570.78, which included analytical, autoantibodies, viral serology and abdominal ultrasound, with a mean of 2.5 consultations. Thus, the total expense in patients with NAFLD was €68,493.6.

CONCLUSION

NAFLD is a frequent cause of hypertransaminasemia. However, the heterogeneity in the management and terminology of the disease makes it necessary to initiate medical training actions in order to unify the criteria for disease control.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without advanced fibrosis after HCV eradication antiviral treatment

From the last few years, hepatitis C virus and the new direct antiviral treatments are being more and more important. In consequence, case studies like the one we present, the appearance of hepatocelullar carcinoma after its eradication with fibrosis grade 2, are getting special interest. In 2007, our patient was treated with pegylated interferon α-2a and ribavirin, having a sustained virological response after it. In this way, liver fibrosis grade 2 was confirmed by a biopsy. Finally, after corroborating a good liver functioning, the patient was discharged (as, according to the guidebooks, an ultrasound scan of screeing every 6 months was not required). In 2014, the patient came to hospital because of a pain at right hypochondrium and he was diagnosed with hepatocelullar carcinoma. A hepatectomy was done objectifying the surgical piece, liver fibrosis grade 2, one more time. Subsequently, a tumour relapse through an abdominal CT scan, a tumour relapse was found and despite the Sorafenib treatment, the patient died on January 2015. This case study provokes curiosity and uncertainty about the attitude which should be taken respect to the monitoring, and hepatocelullar carcinoma screening overall, in patients with a sustained virological response after eradicator treatment and without advanced fibrosis. Nowadays, with the benefits of the new treatments, the amount of patients in this situation is increasing significantly.