1
|
Schlegel A, Mueller M, Muller X, Eden J, Panconesi R, von Felten S, Steigmiller K, Sousa Da Silva RX, de Rougemont O, Mabrut JY, Lesurtel M, Cerisuelo MC, Heaton ND, Allard MA, Adam R, Monbaliu D, Jochmans I, Haring MPD, Porte RJ, Parente A, Muiesan P, Kron P, Attia M, Kollmann D, Berlakovich G, Rogiers X, Petterson K, Kranich AL, Amberg S, Müllhaupt B, Clavien PA, Dutkowski P. A multicenter randomized-controlled trial of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for human liver grafts before transplantation. J Hepatol 2023; 78:783-793. [PMID: 36681160 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Machine perfusion is a novel method intended to optimize livers before transplantation. However, its effect on morbidity within a 1-year period after transplantation has remained unclear. METHODS In this multicenter controlled trial, we randomly assigned livers donated after brain death (DBD) for liver transplantation (LT). Livers were either conventionally cold stored (control group), or cold stored and subsequently treated by 1-2 h hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) before implantation (HOPE group). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one post-transplant complication per patient, graded by the Clavien score of ≥III, within 1-year after LT. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), laboratory parameters, as well as duration of hospital and intensive care unit stay, graft survival, patient survival, and biliary complications served as secondary endpoints. RESULTS Between April 2015 and August 2019, we randomized 177 livers, resulting in 170 liver transplantations (85 in the HOPE group and 85 in the control group). The number of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication was 46/85 (54.1%) in the control group and 44/85 (51.8%) in the HOPE group (odds ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.50-1.66; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were also not significantly different between groups. A post hoc analysis revealed that liver-related Clavien ≥IIIb complications occurred less frequently in the HOPE group compared to the control group (risk ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = 0.027). Likewise, graft failure due to liver-related complications did not occur in the HOPE group, but occurred in 7% (6 of 85) of the control group (log-rank test, p = 0.004, Gray test, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS HOPE after cold storage of DBD livers resulted in similar proportions of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication compared to controls. Exploratory findings suggest that HOPE decreases the risk of severe liver graft-related events. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS This randomized controlled phase III trial is the first to investigate the impact of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) on cumulative complications within a 12-month period after liver transplantation. Compared to conventional cold storage, HOPE did not have a significant effect on the number of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication. However, we believe that HOPE may have a beneficial effect on the quantity of complications per patient, based on its application leading to fewer severe liver graft-related complications, and to a lower risk of liver-related graft loss. The HOPE approach can be applied easily after organ transport during recipient hepatectomy. This appears fundamental for wide acceptance since concurring perfusion technologies need either perfusion at donor sites or continuous perfusion during organ transport, which are much costlier and more laborious. We conclude therefore that the post hoc findings of this trial should be further validated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Matteo Mueller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Muller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hepatology Institute of Lyon, INSERM 1052, Lyon, France
| | - Janina Eden
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Panconesi
- General Surgery 2U-Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Stefanie von Felten
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Steigmiller
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Richard X Sousa Da Silva
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Olivier de Rougemont
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Yves Mabrut
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hepatology Institute of Lyon, INSERM 1052, Lyon, France
| | - Mickaël Lesurtel
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Hepatology Institute of Lyon, INSERM 1052, Lyon, France
| | | | - Nigel D Heaton
- Liver Transplant Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marc Antoine Allard
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, Cancers and Transplantation", Univ Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Rene Adam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Research Unit "Chronotherapy, Cancers and Transplantation", Univ Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Diethard Monbaliu
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Transplantation Research Group, Lab of Abdominal Transplantation, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Abdominal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Transplantation Research Group, Lab of Abdominal Transplantation, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Abdominal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martijn P D Haring
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J Porte
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paolo Muiesan
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, UK; General and Liver Transplant Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico and University of Milan, 20122, Italy
| | - Philipp Kron
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK
| | - Magdy Attia
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, UK
| | - Dagmar Kollmann
- Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xavier Rogiers
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liver Transplantation Service, Ghent University Hospital Medical School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karin Petterson
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anne L Kranich
- ODC BV, Keizersgracht 62-64, 1015, Amsterdam EBC, the Netherlands
| | - Stefanie Amberg
- ODC BV, Keizersgracht 62-64, 1015, Amsterdam EBC, the Netherlands
| | - Beat Müllhaupt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu Y, Lewis MR, Mitchao DP, Benjamin ER, Wong M, Demetriades D. Gunshot wound versus blunt liver injuries: different liver-related complications and outcomes. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:505-12. [PMID: 36115907 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02096-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Severe hepatic injury due to gunshot (GSW) compared to blunt mechanism may have significantly different presentation, management, complications, and outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the differences. METHODS Retrospective single-center analysis June 1, 2015-June 30, 2020, included all patients with Grade III-V liver injuries due to GSW or blunt mechanism. Clinical characteristics, severity of injury, liver-related complications (rebleeding, necrosis/abscess, bile leak/biloma, pseudoaneurysm, acute liver failure) and overall outcomes (mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and ventilatory days) were compared. RESULTS Of 879 patients admitted with hepatic trauma, 347 sustained high-grade injury and were included: 81 (23.3%) due to GSW and 266 (76.7%) due to blunt force. A significantly larger proportion of patients with GSW were managed operatively (82.7 vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001). GSW was associated with significantly more liver-related complications (40.7% vs. 27.4%, p = 0.023), specifically liver necrosis/abscess (18.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.003) and bile leak/biloma (12.3% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.028). On subgroup analysis, in patients with grade III injury, the incidence of liver necrosis/abscess and bile leak/biloma remained significantly higher after GSW (13.9% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.008 and 11.1% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.018, respectively). In sub analysis of 88 patients with leading severe liver injuries, GSW had a significantly longer hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and ventilator days. CONCLUSION GSW mechanism to the liver is associated with a higher incidence of liver-related complications than blunt force injury.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tranah TH, Ballester MP, Carbonell-Asins JA, Ampuero J, Alexandrino G, Caracostea A, Sánchez-Torrijos Y, Thomsen KL, Kerbert AJC, Capilla-Lozano M, Romero-Gómez M, Escudero-García D, Montoliu C, Jalan R, Shawcross DL. Plasma ammonia levels predict hospitalisation with liver-related complications and mortality in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2022; 77:1554-1563. [PMID: 35872326 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Hyperammonaemia is central in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. It also has pleiotropic deleterious effects on several organ systems, such as immune function, sarcopenia, energy metabolism and portal hypertension. This study was performed to test the hypothesis that severity of hyperammonaemia is a risk factor for liver-related complications in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis. METHODS We studied 754 clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis from 3 independent liver units. Baseline ammonia levels were corrected to the upper limit of normal (AMM-ULN) for the reference laboratory. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation with liver-related complications (a composite endpoint of bacterial infection, variceal bleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy, or new onset or worsening of ascites). Multivariable competing risk frailty analyses using fast unified random forests were performed to predict complications and mortality. External validation was carried out using prospective data from 130 patients with cirrhosis in an independent tertiary liver centre. RESULTS Overall, 260 (35%) patients were hospitalised with liver-related complications. On multivariable analysis, AMM-ULN was an independent predictor of both liver-related complications (hazard ratio 2.13; 95% CI 1.89-2.40; p <0.001) and mortality (hazard ratio 1.45; 95% CI 1.20-1.76; p <0.001). The AUROC of AMM-ULN was 77.9% for 1-year liver-related complications, which is higher than traditional severity scores. Statistical differences in survival were found between high and low levels of AMM-ULN both for complications and mortality (p <0.001) using 1.4 as the optimal cut-off from the training set. AMM-ULN remained a key variable for the prediction of complications within the random forests model in the derivation cohort and upon external validation. CONCLUSION Ammonia is an independent predictor of hospitalisation with liver-related complications and mortality in clinically stable outpatients with cirrhosis and performs better than traditional prognostic scores in predicting complications. LAY SUMMARY We conducted a prospective cohort study evaluating the association of blood ammonia levels with the risk of adverse outcomes in 754 patients with stable cirrhosis across 3 independent liver units. We found that ammonia is a key determinant that helps to predict which patients will be hospitalised, develop liver-related complications and die; this was confirmed in an independent cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H Tranah
- Institute of Liver Studies, Dept of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - María-Pilar Ballester
- Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Javier Ampuero
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Ciberehd, Spain
| | - Gonçalo Alexandrino
- Institute of Liver Studies, Dept of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, Portugal
| | - Andra Caracostea
- Institute of Liver Studies, Dept of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yolanda Sánchez-Torrijos
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Ciberehd, Spain
| | - Karen L Thomsen
- Liver Failure Group, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, United Kingdom; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annarein J C Kerbert
- Liver Failure Group, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, United Kingdom
| | | | - Manuel Romero-Gómez
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Ciberehd, Spain
| | | | - Carmina Montoliu
- INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Spain
| | - Rajiv Jalan
- Liver Failure Group, Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, United Kingdom; European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF Clif), Spain.
| | - Debbie L Shawcross
- Institute of Liver Studies, Dept of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kechagias S, Nasr P, Blomdahl J, Ekstedt M. Established and emerging factors affecting the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolism 2020; 111S:154183. [PMID: 32061907 DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease affecting approximately 25% of the global population. Although a majority of NAFLD patients will never experience liver-related symptoms it is estimated that 5-10% will develop cirrhosis-related complications with risk of death or need for liver transplantation. NAFLD is closely associated with cardiovascular disease and components of the metabolic syndrome. However, NAFLD is not uncommon in lean individuals and may in these subjects represent a different entity with separate pathophysiological mechanisms involved implying a higher risk for development of end-stage liver disease. There is considerable fluctuation in the histopathological course of NAFLD that may partly be attributed to lifestyle factors and dietary composition. Nutrients such as fructose, monounsaturated fatty acids, and trans-fatty acids may aggravate NAFLD. Presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus seems to be the most important clinical predictor of liver-related morbidity and mortality in NAFLD. Apart from severity of the metabolic syndrome, genetic polymorphisms and environmental factors, such as moderate alcohol consumption, may explain the variation in histopathological and clinical outcome among NAFLD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stergios Kechagias
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Patrik Nasr
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Julia Blomdahl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| | - Mattias Ekstedt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Doussot A, Fuks D, Regimbeau JM, Farges O, Sa-Cunha A, Pruvot FR, Adam R, Navarro F, Azoulay D, Heyd B, Pessaux P. Major hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or colorectal liver metastases. Are we talking about the same story? Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:2353-2359. [PMID: 31787154 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 07/07/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Major hepatectomy (MH) is often needed in the curative management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). While similar outcomes could be expected after MH for IHCC and CRLM, outcomes seem worse after MH for IHCC. A better understanding of such differences might help improving perioperative outcomes but comprehensive analysis are lacking. METHODS All patients undergoing curative intent MH for IHCC or CRLM from 2003 to 2009 were included from two dedicated multi-institutional datasets. Preoperative management and short-term outcomes after MH were first compared. Independent predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity were identified. RESULTS Among 827 patients, 333 and 494 patients underwent MH for IHCC and CRLM, respectively. Preoperative portal vein embolization was more frequently performed in the CRLM group (p < 0.001). MH in the IHCC group required more extended resection (p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality and severe morbidity rates were significantly higher in the IHCC group (7.2% vs. 1.2% and 29.7% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001, respectively). Main causes for mortality were postoperative liver failure and deep surgical site infection. MH for IHCC was an independent risk factor for mortality (p < 0.001) and severe morbidity (p < 0.001). After propensity score matching (212 patients in each group), the aforementioned differences regarding outcomes remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION This study suggests that IHCC patients are inherently more at risk after MH as compared to CRLM patients. Considering that postoperative liver failure was the most frequent cause of death, preoperative planning might have been inadequate in the setting of IHCC while more complex/extended resections should be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Doussot
- Department of Digestive and Surgical Oncology. Liver Transplantion Unit. University Hospital of Besançon, France.
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Marc Regimbeau
- Department of Surgery, SSPC (Simplified Surgical care for Complex Patients) BQR Research Unit, University Hospital of Amiens, France
| | - Olivier Farges
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, AP-HP, Université Paris 7, Clichy, France
| | - Antonio Sa-Cunha
- Department of Surgery, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Inserm U985, Villejuif, France
| | - François-René Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpital Huriez, University of Lille, France
| | - René Adam
- Department of Surgery, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Inserm U985, Villejuif, France
| | - Francis Navarro
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Daniel Azoulay
- Department of Surgery, APHP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Inserm U985, Villejuif, France; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bruno Heyd
- Department of Digestive and Surgical Oncology. Liver Transplantion Unit. University Hospital of Besançon, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU), Institute for Minimally Invasive Hybrid Image-Guided Surgery, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgical Unit, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Casado JL, Esteban MA, Bañón S, Moreno A, Perez-Elías MJ, Mateos ML, Moreno S, Quereda C. Fibrosis Regression Explains Differences in Outcome in HIV-/HCV-Coinfected Patients with Cirrhosis After Sustained Virological Response. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:3473-81. [PMID: 26112991 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3773-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Fibrosis regression (FR) after sustained virological response (SVR) should produce a better outcome in hepatitis C (HCV)-/HIV-coinfected patients with liver cirrhosis, but there are no specific data in this issue. METHODS We compared the incidence rate (IR) and the time to develop a liver complication and death in 133 cirrhotic patients according to SVR or/and FR. RESULTS Of 42 patients with SVR, 23 (55%) had FR, in comparison with only 14 of the 91 (15%) without SVR. During a follow-up of 6.8 years (916.8 person-years), the IR of death, liver-related death, and liver-related complications were 2.45, 0.61, and 1.22 per 100 persons/year among SVR/FR, and 7.6, 5.9, and 6.81 among non-SVR without FR (p < 0.01), respectively. SVR patients without FR had also a lower rate of liver-related complications (1.78 vs 3.25; p = 0.02), but a worse IR of death (5.36) and liver-related death (2.68) than non-SVR patients with FR (1.3, and 0.65; p < 0.01). Moreover, FR was associated with less hospital admissions and decreasing alpha-fetoprotein levels. In Cox analysis, only FR was associated with a lower risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio, HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.86), and liver-related death (HR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.65), whereas both FR (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.03-0.3, p < 0.01) and SVR (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.87) decreased the risk of liver-related complications. CONCLUSION Fibrosis regression after SVR is associated with the highest reduction in death of any cause, liver-related mortality, and liver-related complications in HIV-/HCV-coinfected patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
|