A multicenter randomized-controlled trial of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for human liver grafts before transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Machine perfusion is a novel method intended to optimize livers before transplantation. However, its effect on morbidity within a 1-year period after transplantation has remained unclear.

METHODS

In this multicenter controlled trial, we randomly assigned livers donated after brain death (DBD) for liver transplantation (LT). Livers were either conventionally cold stored (control group), or cold stored and subsequently treated by 1-2 h hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) before implantation (HOPE group). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of at least one post-transplant complication per patient, graded by the Clavien score of ≥III, within 1-year after LT. The comprehensive complication index (CCI), laboratory parameters, as well as duration of hospital and intensive care unit stay, graft survival, patient survival, and biliary complications served as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Between April 2015 and August 2019, we randomized 177 livers, resulting in 170 liver transplantations (85 in the HOPE group and 85 in the control group). The number of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication was 46/85 (54.1%) in the control group and 44/85 (51.8%) in the HOPE group (odds ratio 0.91; 95% CI 0.50-1.66; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were also not significantly different between groups. A post hoc analysis revealed that liver-related Clavien ≥IIIb complications occurred less frequently in the HOPE group compared to the control group (risk ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = 0.027). Likewise, graft failure due to liver-related complications did not occur in the HOPE group, but occurred in 7% (6 of 85) of the control group (log-rank test, p = 0.004, Gray test, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

HOPE after cold storage of DBD livers resulted in similar proportions of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication compared to controls. Exploratory findings suggest that HOPE decreases the risk of severe liver graft-related events.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

This randomized controlled phase III trial is the first to investigate the impact of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) on cumulative complications within a 12-month period after liver transplantation. Compared to conventional cold storage, HOPE did not have a significant effect on the number of patients with at least one Clavien ≥III complication. However, we believe that HOPE may have a beneficial effect on the quantity of complications per patient, based on its application leading to fewer severe liver graft-related complications, and to a lower risk of liver-related graft loss. The HOPE approach can be applied easily after organ transport during recipient hepatectomy. This appears fundamental for wide acceptance since concurring perfusion technologies need either perfusion at donor sites or continuous perfusion during organ transport, which are much costlier and more laborious. We conclude therefore that the post hoc findings of this trial should be further validated in future studies.

Selinexor (KPT-330), an Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) Compound, in Combination with FOLFOX in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) - Final Results of the Phase I Trial SENTINEL

BACKGROUND

Selinexor is an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export compound that specifically blocks Chromosomal Region Maintenance protein 1.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of selinexor plus 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter phase I trial, mCRC patients, eligible for oxaliplatin-based treatment, were enrolled to receive oral selinexor on days 1, 3, and 8 plus mFOLFOX6 every two weeks. Primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, overall response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 patients were enrolled, who had prior treatment with oxaliplatin (6/10), irinotecan (8/10), bevacizumab (6/10) or anti-EGFR therapy (5/10). Four consecutive patients received 40 mg selinexor plus mFOLFOX6. All four experienced dose-limiting toxicities and withdrew from the study after a median of two cycles. Thus, this dose level was regarded as toxic and no further patients were evaluated at this dose. Six patients were enrolled with 20 mg selinexor plus mFOLFOX6. Despite better tolerability, four patients withdrew (patient wish) after the first cycle and only two patients continued until disease progression. Most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse events were nausea (80%), diarrhea (70%), vomiting (60%), fatigue (60%), anorexia (40%), and impaired vision (40%). Due to the short treatment exposure, no relevant clinical activity was observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, selinexor on this dose schedule plus mFOLFOX6 was not tolerable. Other dosing schedules or combinations may be evaluated. Clinical trial identifier NCT02384850.

Neue molekulare Therapien beim nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkarzinom am Beispiel der EGFR/HER1-Inhibition

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer in western industrialized countries. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis and suffer many tumor-associated symptoms. Unfortunately, approximately 70% of patients with NSCLC present themselves with advanced poor-prognosis stage III and IV disease. In advanced disease, treatment is palliative and symptom-oriented. New less Adenotoxic drugs are urgently needed. One of the targets of new agents is the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1), and agents targeting this receptor include erlotinib, gefitinib and cetuximab.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Erlotinib, gefitinib and cetuximab have been investigated in different clinical studies and provided objective responses and symptom relief. A benefit in survival could only be observed in second- and third-line therapy with erlotinib. All new agents have been generally well tolerated. Erlotinib was recently approved in the USA and Europe for second- and third-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Anti-EGFR has shown promising antitumor activity in NSCLC with a mild toxicity profile. However, some clinical issues such as screening for potentially responsive patients and optimal combination with other drugs should be the aim of future studies.

Symposium on health economics in oncology. Freiburg, Germany, June 1995

Dr. E. Enghofer (Wien, Austria) summarized the content of the presentations and discussions of the symposium in his concluding remarks. 1. The organizers should be congradulated on their initiative in bringing together at the symposium experts from different disciplines, i.e., medicine, ethics, health economics, jurisprudence, the pharmaceutical industry and, last but not least, cost providers. 2. Health economics as an issue in health care has been around for quite some while. One example can be found in the German Drug Guidelines dating back to 1990, where the following terms have already been defined: therapeutic benefit, medical needs, and achieving therapeutic goals. 3. Health economics serves as a "support function" in the medical decision-making process. It has as yet no decisive role in the application to license a drug nor in questions concerning a physician's liability. Health economics as a discipline, however, was a reminder of, and served as a catalytic function for: a) The differentiation between the benefit of a medical intervention and its pure effectiveness. b) The definition of medical standards as a means to compare the quality of health care between different institutions, to uncover quality deficits and to develop strategies for the optimization of medical quality (quality management). Routine deviation from these standards is unethical. The German Cancer Society has taken on the task of defining such standards in cancer care. c) The difference between rationalising and rationing health care. The spending of the current health-care budget needs to be screened for unnecessary and/or inappropriate diagnostic procedures and treatment modalities as well as for "below-standard" care. The money that can be saved here can then be shifted towards financing "state of the art" medicine or can be used in the decision to substitute certain procedures. 4. The a priori definition of the desired outcome of a medical intervention is of paramount importance for the evaluation of the actual treatment result. Economical evaluations are easier when cure rather than palliation is the aim of a particular treatment and when alternative therapies do exist such that cost comparisons are possible. In any case, therapeutic interventions need to be adapted to the desired treatment goal; only then can the question be answered whether or not the means (cost) are (is) justified. 5. Outcome studies need to take into account every relevant medical aspect (i.e. disease management studies), and they should be accompanied by evaluation studies. The latter must also include unselected patients in daily practice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)