Placement of a spring filter during interventional treatment of deep venous thrombosis to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism.
Acta Radiol 1999;
40:545-51. [PMID:
10485246 DOI:
10.3109/02841859909175582]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To assess the efficacy of the Spring filter during interventional treatment of deep venous thrombosis in vivo.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A model of inferior vena cava thrombosis was used. Part I: The thrombus was treated by the pulse-spray technique (PT) (urokinase 250,000 IU; n=7) or a rotatory basket catheter, Thrombolizer (MT) (activated with compressed air at 7 atm; n=5). Part II: Following placement of a Spring filter, the animal underwent PT (n=5) or MT (n=5). Based on the results of part I, the treatment protocol was modified (PT, urokinase 500,000 IU; MT, compressed air at 8 atm). Embolus volumes trapped by the filter and found in the lungs were calculated and the filtering efficacy quantified.
RESULTS
Part I: Pulmonary emboli (1 to 4 mm in diameter) were observed in 3 animals in the PT group and 1 animal in the MT group, respectively. Median reduction in thrombus volume was 21% and 4% by PT and MT, respectively. Part II: In the PT group, 58% and 100% of the total embolus load was trapped in 2 animals, while the filter failed to trap emboli (1 to 1.5 mm in diameter) in 1 animal. In the remaining 2 animals, no embolus was found trapped by the filter or in the lungs. In the MT group, 55 97% (median 83%) of the embolus load was trapped. Emboli found in the lungs did not exceed 4 mm in diameter.
CONCLUSION
Preceding interventional treatment of venous thrombosis with placement of the Spring filter reduced the embolic burden on the lungs.
Collapse