1
|
Vinish DB, Krishnamurthy G, Radhakrishna P, Sarangapani A, Ganesan S, Ramas J, Kalyanasundaram R, Ramakrishna BS. Endoscopic Stone Extraction followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Tandem for Concomitant Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: A Prospective Study. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:129-34. [PMID: 35068793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-session endoscopic stone extraction (ESE) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has the best outcome in managing concomitant cholelithiasis (gallstone disease [GSD]) and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stone [CBDS]). Traditional rendezvous technique with an intraoperative cholangiogram is associated with various technical (bowel distention, frozen Calot's triangle, limitation of intraoperative cholangiogram and so on) and logistical difficulties (lack of trained personnel and equipment for ESE in the operating room). We modified our approach of ESE-LC (tandem ESE-LC) to study the safety of the approach and overcome these disadvantages of the traditional rendezvous approach. METHODS A prospective study of patients with GSD and suspected CBDS from January 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. Tandem ESE-LC involves ESE and LC under the same general anaesthesia in a single day, while ESE is performed in the endoscopic suite using carbon dioxide insufflation, a balloon/basket was used for achieving bile duct clearance and the same was confirmed with an occlusion cholangiogram. Patients were then shifted to the operating room for LC. The primary outcome included bile duct clearance and safety of the procedure. RESULTS Of 56 patients assessed for eligibility, 42 were included in the study (median age: 53 years, 25 [60%] women). Biliary colic was the most common presenting symptom (n = 24, 57%), followed by acute cholecystitis (n = 11, 26%). The median number of stones and stone size was 1 (1-6) and 4 mm (3-10), respectively. All patients had successful bile duct clearance. Stenting was performed in 5 (12%) patients. Intraoperatively, Calot's dissection was difficult and frozen in 10 and 11 patients respectively. The cystic duct was short and wide in 13 (31%) patients. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed in 6 (14%) patients. The median duration of postprocedural hospital stay was 1 (0-13) day. Three patients had tandem ESE-LC on a day-care basis. One patient had post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography pancreatitis, and another required percutaneous drainage for gall bladder fossa collection. No patient had retained CBDS at a median follow-up of 18 (3-28) months. CONCLUSION Tandem ESE-LC is safe and effective method in managing concomitant GSD and CBDS.
Collapse
Key Words
- ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- CBD stones
- CBDS, common bile duct stone
- ERC, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography
- ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretography
- ESE, endoscopic stone extraction
- GB, gall bladder
- GSD, gallstone disease
- LC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- OR, operating room
- POD, postoperative day
- SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- TAP, transversus abdominis plane
- bile duct clearance
- rendezvous
- retained stones
- single sitting
Collapse
|
2
|
Parsi MA, Schulman AR, Aslanian HR, Bhutani MS, Krishnan K, Lichtenstein DR, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Sethi A, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Watson RR, Maple JT. Devices for endoscopic hemostasis of nonvariceal GI bleeding (with videos). VideoGIE 2019; 4:285-299. [PMID: 31334417 PMCID: PMC6616320 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for GI nonvariceal bleeding. Although some of the devices and techniques used for this purpose have been well studied, others are relatively new, with few available outcomes data. Methods In this document, we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeding, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and financial considerations for their use. Results Devices used for endoscopic hemostasis in the GI tract can be classified into injection devices (needles), thermal devices (multipolar/bipolar probes, hemostatic forceps, heater probe, argon plasma coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy), mechanical devices (clips, suturing devices, banding devices, stents), and topical devices (hemostatic sprays). Conclusions Endoscopic evaluation and treatment remains a cornerstone in the management of nonvariceal upper- and lower-GI bleeding. A variety of devices is available for hemostasis of bleeding lesions in the GI tract. Other than injection therapy, which should not be used as monotherapy, there are few compelling data that strongly favor any one device over another. For endoscopists, the choice of a hemostatic device should depend on the type and location of the bleeding lesion, the availability of equipment and expertise, and the cost of the device.
Collapse
Key Words
- ABS, Ankaferd blood stopper
- APC, argon plasma coagulation
- ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- CPT, Current Procedural Terminology
- CSEMS, covered self-expandable metallic stent
- EBL, endoscopic band ligation
- EDP, endoscopic Doppler probe
- GAVE, gastric antral vascular ectasia
- HP, heater probe
- LGIB, lower GI bleeding
- MPEC, multipolar electrocoagulation
- OTSC, over-the-scope clip
- PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- TTS, through-the-scope
- U.S. FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration
- UGIB, upper GI bleeding
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mansour A Parsi
- Section for Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX
| | - Kuman Krishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David R Lichtenstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Rahul Pannala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Arvind J Trindade
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Rabindra R Watson
- Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - John T Maple
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watson RR, Parsi MA, Aslanian HR, Goodman AJ, Lichtenstein DR, Melson J, Navaneethan U, Pannala R, Sethi A, Sullivan SA, Thosani NC, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Maple JT. Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. VideoGIE 2018; 3:329-338. [PMID: 30402576 PMCID: PMC6205352 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). METHODS In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations. RESULTS Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs. CONCLUSIONS Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.
Collapse
Key Words
- ASGE, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- C-APCS, Comprehensive Ambulatory Payment Classification
- CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- CPT, Current Procedural Terminology (https://www.asge.org/docs/default-source/education/Technology_Reviews/doc-enteral-nutrition-access-devices.pdf?sfvrsn=4)
- EHL, electrohydraulic lithotripsy
- EPBD, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation
- ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- ES, endoscopic sphincterotomy
- ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
- FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- FREDDY, frequency-doubled, double-pulse neodymium
- HCPCS, Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System
- MAUDE, Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience
- ML, mechanical lithotripsy
- RCT, randomized controlled trial
- YAG, yttrium aluminum garnet
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kohtaro Ooka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Romulo Celli
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James J Farrell
- Yale Center for Pancreatic Disease, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|